ITAR UPDATES
|
|
|
|
In August 24, 2026 The Department of State rescinded Syria’s designation as a State Sponsor of Terrorism.
In a statement by Secretary Rubio ” I authorized the formal rescission of Syria’s designation as a State Sponsor of Terrorism (SST), following the conclusion of the mandatory 45-day Congressional notification period. I have also delisted Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham’s (HTS) designation as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT). These actions represent another historic step by President Trump to give the Syrian people a path to prosperity…..This eliminates the final major barriers for private sector investment in Syria and promotes Syria’s economic recovery and reintegration into the global economy.”
Below is an overview of the current restrictions.
If you have any questions, please contact us at 703-847-5801 or email us at info@fdassociates.net
UPCOMING ITAR WORKSHOPS & WEBINARS
OUR FALL SCHEDULE IS READY
Agendas available on our website
| ITAR FUNdamentals | September 29 – October 2, 2026
9 AM- 1 PM |
| ITAR for the Empowered Official | October 13, 2026
9 AM – 1 PM |
| ITAR Compliance Programs | November 3 – November 4, 2026
9 AM – 1 PM |

By George (Jorge) Cánovas
Vice President – Compliance
FD Associates, Inc.
When most people hear the phrase International Traffic in Arms Regulations or ITAR, they imagine crates of missiles, stealth fighters, or nuclear warheads. They do not picture an underwater robot used by a marine survey company, a high-performance antenna that can be fitted on a commercial airframe, or a piece of body armor sold through a subcontractor. Yet those are precisely the kinds of items the law can capture. Many of you are specifically aware of this and how nuances can matter to include end users and forward manufacturing.
For readers who have never worked with these rules, or work tangentially with the ITAR in a business development or management position, the ITAR is the regulatory framework administered by the U.S. Department of State (DoS) that controls exports of defense articles, services, and related technical data. The backbone of the system is the U.S. Munitions List, a dense catalog of categories ranging from firearms to avionics to chemical precursors. If your work or your businesses work appears on that list, you cannot transfer it abroad or share it with foreign persons inside the United States without approval. And “export” does not just mean shipping. Letting a foreign engineer review controlled design drawings in your office can be treated exactly the same way as sending a crate of parts across a border.
This is not an academic concern. A small business that never thought of itself as part of the defense sector can suddenly find that its products, software, or even research activities fall under ITAR, which can occur when the DoS’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) modifies the rules. When that happens, the company must apply for licenses through the DDTC, keep meticulous records, and adapt to a new world of restrictions and oversight. Licenses can take weeks or months and may come with conditions that change how and when you deliver to customers. Penalties for violations are severe, running from multimillion-dollar fines to loss of export privileges. It can also go the other way, and relive companies if the items they produce, sell, etc., have been removed.
On August 27, 2025, the State Department published a final rule in the Federal Register amending key sections of ITAR. This rule revises the U.S. Munitions List, updates definitions, and creates a new license exemption. It builds on an interim rule issued in January 2025 and is explicitly framed as part of a broader strategy to streamline defense trade and deepen cooperation with U.S. allies and partners[1]. The timing was no accident. A few months earlier, President Biden signed Executive Order 14268, Reforming Foreign Defense Sales to Improve Speed and Accountability, which directed the Departments of State and Defense to review the U.S. Munitions List to ensure it focuses on the most sensitive technologies while clearing away unnecessary restrictions.
The rule removes several items that the government no longer believes provide a critical military advantage. Certain GNSS anti-spoofing and anti-jam systems, some controlled reception pattern antennas, airborne collision avoidance system antennas, and tungsten- or steel-based lead-free birdshot are all being shifted off the USML. Once removed, they fall under Department of Commerce jurisdiction and the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), meaning they remain regulated for export but in a less restrictive framework.
At the same time, the final rule strengthens control. It makes permanent temporary controls on items “specially designed” for the F-47 Next Generation Air Dominance Platform[2]. It clarifies definitions around advanced military aircraft. It also responds to public comments that highlighted the civil use of large autonomous underwater vehicles. Recognizing the importance of these systems to sectors like energy, telecommunications, and marine research, the rule creates a new license exemption that allows U.S. companies to participate in operations involving certain Underwater Unmanned Vehicles performing functions such as inspecting offshore pipelines, repairing telecom cables, or conducting search and rescue missions, without the full weight of ITAR licensing. This is a striking acknowledgment of the dual-use reality of twenty-first century technology.
DDTC also emphasized that these revisions are not final. The agency continues to welcome input from the public, inviting companies and researchers to identify items they believe should be revised, removed, or added in future updates. This willingness to consult is unusual in the world of arms control and underscores a trend toward more transparent, iterative management of the U.S. Munitions List.
If your company works in aerospace, maritime technology, advanced electronics, protective equipment, chemicals or any sector that develops products with potential dual-use application, we strongly suggest the you read the attached Federal Register Notice . The revision may address technology that your company handles, makes or develops. The revision reshapes what falls under the ITAR and what shifts to Commerce, falling into the EAR. These changes carry real consequences for how you classify your products, pursue contracts, and handle foreign partnerships. Even if you have never considered yourself part of the defense supply chain, these changes could quietly alter your obligations.
For a small company, the consequences are immediate and tangible. A firm producing antennas or sensors may suddenly find that while many models are now subject to the EAR, certain advanced or military-configured versions remain ITAR-controlled. That reclassification affects the markets the firm can serve, the partnerships it can form with larger primes, and the way investors assess its risk profile.
Consider also the opportunities. A marine robotics startup might benefit from the new UUV exemption. Instead of months of waiting on a license, it could send a vehicle overseas for a civil infrastructure project with far fewer delays provided the company is registered with DDTC. That advantage is real, but only if the company can prove it qualifies, document the mission, and keep meticulous control of the platform.
A chemical supplier may need to revisit formulations now listed by name in the U.S. Munitions List or a software developer whose algorithms strengthen satellite navigation against spoofing may find itself removed from the ITAR and now under the EAR jurisdiction, which is less restrictive for some destinations but carries its own set of risks.
The common thread is that export classification is critical to all exporters. ITAR is not just associated with missiles, tanks and stealthy aircraft, it touches electronics, materials science, robotics, and software.
For small businesses, the difference between opportunity and liability often lies in whether leadership is paying attention to how their company products, software, technology and services are controlled and the reason that executives must clearly understand the liabilities, as well as business strategic opportunities. If your business can navigate these opportunities correctly and with foresight, you will be the company with the competitive edge, which equates to profits.
These ITAR US Munitions List revisions should also matter deeply for foreign companies. ITAR follows the item, not just the U.S. manufacturer. A distributor in Europe handling American-made products cannot re-export them freely without reexport authorization. A shipyard in Asia servicing vessels with U.S. navigation equipment must comply with U.S. licensing rules. Even a foreign research consortium that touches U.S. technical data can be pulled into the ITAR regime. Foreign companies need to be knowledgeable on specific changes to the ITAR and the EAR if they do business in the defense sector.
What may not be obvious is that compliance can be a competitive advantage. Executive Order 14268 is explicit about its intent: to streamline defense trade, facilitate cooperation with allies, and reduce unnecessary burdens. For a foreign company seeking to enter the U.S. defense supply chain, demonstrating a mature understanding of ITAR and the EAR is not a box-checking exercise it is a selling point. American primes and government customers increasingly want foreign partners who can handle controlled technology without fear of violations. Firms that invest in compliance now are better placed to win contracts, attract U.S. partners, and be viewed as credible contributors to joint defense projects.
The executive order behind this rule makes the logic plain, that is; by focusing the U.S. Munitions List on the most sensitive technologies and easing controls elsewhere, the U.S. government is trying to speed up defense trade with trusted allies. Foreign businesses that align early, adopt compliance systems, and train their staff are positioning themselves not only to stay safe but also to grow faster in a global marketplace that prizes reliability and accountability.
Although this article focuses on businesses, academic research institutions are not immune to the ITAR and the evolution of changes in the regulations. University labs often work with technologies that straddle the civil–military divide. An engineering department experimenting with advanced antennas, a marine science institute operating an underwater vehicle, or a chemistry lab developing new energetic materials can all find themselves pulled into ITAR. The presence of foreign students adds further complexity, since allowing access to controlled data counts as an export under the law. U.S. institutions operating off U.S. soil can find themselves in even a more complex situation. What is clear is that institutions that fail to update their technology control plans, and their internal compliance programs risk both regulatory exposure, reputational harm and the loss of valuable grant opportunities.
The September 2025 rule is not simply a regulatory housekeeping exercise. It is part of a deliberate strategy to make the U.S. export control system more precise, more responsive, and more supportive of international cooperation. For small businesses, it is a reminder that compliance is inseparable from competitiveness. For foreign firms, it is a signal that mastering ITAR and the EAR is a way to distinguish themselves as reliable partners in the U.S. defense market. And for research institutions, it is another push to integrate export awareness into daily life.
In the end, these revisions tell a story of adaptation, as it is clear that the U.S. government wants to protect the warfighter’s edge without smothering innovation. Businesses that fully embrace and comply, whether in Virginia or Paris, will not only stay on the right side of the law but will also gain an advantage in a world where compliance is itself a mark of credibility.
Please contact FD Associates if you have any questions or our team of experts can help to position your enterprise to have a clear competitive edge and ensure profits, not liabilities end up on your P&L statement.
© FD Associates, Inc., 703-847-5801 – 1945 Old Gallows RD, Suite #530, Vienna, VA 22182
What the Latest ITAR Revisions Mean for Small Businesses – September 2025 Read More »
By Kenneth E. Schmidt, J.D. – Senior Associate
After fording the river and finally getting your Technical Assistance Agreement (“TAA”) or Manufacturing License Agreement (“MLA”) approved by Directorate for Defense Trade Controls (“DDTC”), it can be tempting to start firing off information to and performing defense services for authorized parties. Like cowboys and cowgirls of the past, however, we need to keep firmly in the saddle and not let the cart drift ahead of our horse.
While approval of a TAA/MLA is a good first step on the journey to share export-controlled information and begin defense services, we need to be careful to disarm those thorny administrative tasks, such as inking the TAA/MLA and providing a copy of the fully executed agreement to DDTC within 30 days of the last signature. The International Traffic in Arms Regulations (“ITAR”) Part 124.4 states:
(a) The United States party to a manufacturing license or a technical assistance agreement must file one copy of the concluded agreement with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls not later than 30 days after it enters into force. If the agreement is not concluded within one year of the date of approval, the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls must be notified in writing and be kept informed of the status of the agreement until the requirements of this paragraph or the requirements of § 124.5 are satisfied.
Yes, DDTC wants to see dried ink on that TAA/MLA as a condition precedent to utilizing TAA/MLA authorization. And while it may seem outdated, digital signatures are still not permitted.
Now the second obligation often overlooked in the excitement and flurry of the next great adventure, is the need to let the sheriff (a/k/a DDTC) know before you set out to export technical data or perform defense services. This initial notification requirement is set forth in ITAR Part 123.22(b)(3)(ii), which states:
(ii) Manufacturing license and technical assistance agreements. Prior to the initial export of any technical data and defense services authorized in an agreement the U.S. agreement holder must electronically inform DDTC that exports have begun. In accordance with this subchapter, all subsequent exports of technical data and services are not required to be filed electronically with DDTC except when the export is done using a U.S. Port. Records of all subsequent exports of technical data shall be maintained by the exporter in accordance with this subchapter and shall be made immediately available to DDTC upon request. Exports of technical data in furtherance of an agreement using a U.S. Port shall be made in accordance with § 125.4 of this subchapter and made in accordance with the procedures in paragraph (b)(3)(iii) of this section.
Did you catch that “[p]rior to?” Yep, prior to setting out on the trail with your TAA/MLA, your TAA/MLA must be signed (fully executed), a copy of which provided to DDTC within 30 days after entering into force, and DDTC must be notified prior to the initial export of technical data and/or providing of defense services under the TAA/MLA.
So, if you need help navigating the wild west of TAA/MLA implementation or would like to know what to do if your cart got ahead of the horse, give us a call at 703-847-5801.
Department of State Agreement Notifications – Inking the Deal Read More »
By Kenneth Schmidt – Senior Associate
After a fifteen-year pause in price increases, impressive by any measure, the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) proposes to recalibrate its registration fee structure for exporters, importers, brokers, and manufacturers to fund ongoing operations, technology modernization, registrant support, monitoring and enforcement, and general public outreach operations. The change will mostly impact the approximately 14,500 current DDTC registrants. The rationale, inflation increases over the 15-year period when the rates were last established is a staggering 40%. Given the irregularity of the fee increases, some of the proposed fees are below the 40% inflation while other rates represent an increase that accounts for inflation but adjusts for the future.
DDTC uses a three-tiered structure for registrations. Tier 2 and Tier 3 will see the biggest adjustments, both in terms of price and tier scope.
The tiers are proposed to be defined as follows:
Registrants are persons in the business of manufacturing who (i) do not export, (ii) utilize ITAR exemptions for export, or (iii) have yet to receive a favorable determination from DDTC (i.e. approval, approval with provisos, or written authorization from DDTC to conduct ITAR-regulated activities. Tier one will also include persons engaged in the business of brokering activities (whether you license or not).
Registrants are moderate users of DDTC services and comprise those who received five or less favorable determinations on license applications or requests for authorization for the twelve months preceding ninety days prior to the expiration of current registrant’s expiration.
Registrants comprise those receiving more than five favorable determinations in the twelve months preceding ninety days prior to the expiration of current registrant’s expiration. Additionally, Tier 3 registrants pay an additional $1,100.00 for each favorable determination over five.
DDTC’s current registration discount for exporters and temporary importers of low-value items who fall under Tier 3 will remain unchanged. This low-value discount formula is currently available on the DDTC website.
Finally, Tier 2 and Tier 3 non-profit organizations (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) may also be eligible for a discount to Tier 1 treatment.
Now for the sticker shock:
Comments on the proposed rule are requested by June 10, 2024.
The Fifteen Year Freeze in DDTC Registration Fees Sees a Big Thaw Read More »
By John Herzo, Senior Associate, FD Associates, Inc.
Edited by Jenny Hahn, President, FD Associates, Inc.
September 20, 2023
Did you know that the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (“ITAR”) has an entire chapter devoted to non export activities?? ITAR Part §129 relates to brokering activities performed by U.S. Persons (individuals and companies), foreign companies owned by U.S. persons and foreign persons conducting brokering activities in the U.S. The ITAR’s brokering requirements are some of the most challenging aspects of the ITAR to understand and comply with. This article will provide you with a quick guide to the brokering requirements.
Before we step into this discussion, we explore a recent Department of State consent agreement levied on a U.S. company who did not appreciate the complexities of the ITAR’s brokering requirements. On August 25, 2023, Island Pyrochemical Industries Corp (“IPI”) entered into a 3 year consent agreement with the Department of State (“DOS”) regarding certain violations of the ITAR, including brokering violations. They received a civil penalty and have committed to a monitored compliance program for 3 years. The Charging Letter, Consent Agreement and Order (Link here) are for public display on the Department of State website.
IPI is a small, privately held corporation with less than 100 employees and a manufacturer and supplier of specialty chemicals and related materials with a variety of applications in both the commercial and military sectors, including rocket propellants and precursor chemicals used in explosive ordnance. IPI has affiliates in Brazil and the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”). IPI engages in both domestic and foreign sales.
After registering as a broker in March, 2015, on or around April 2015, IPI contacted three companies to discuss the procurement of ammonium perchlorate (“APC”). APC is listed on the US Munitions List and is considered a defense article. IPI, including IPI’s President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), met with representatives from Avibras Industria Aeroespacial SA (“Avibras”), a Brazilian company, to discuss a transaction to procure APC for Avibras’ use in manufacturing certain rockets for its client, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
At the same time, IPI contacted Dalian Gaojia Chemical Co., Ltd (“Dalian”), a PRC manufacturer of APC, and an export company, Aerospace Long-March International Co., Ltd. (“ALIT”), a subsidiary of China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation, about the supply of APC to Brazil from China.
By undertaking these activities, IPI, engaged in brokering activities, as described in ITAR Part §129.2)\, by facilitating communications and engagement between Avibras. Brazil and ALIT, China[1]. On May 27, 2015, IPI entered into an agreement with Avibras for the procurement of APC from ALIT. The underlying communications validated that IPI was taking an action on behalf of another, coordinating the sale and delivery of the APC from ALIT, China to Avibras, Brazil.
In addition to this activity, IPI also engaged in multiple brokering activities in this transaction involving the solicitation, promotion, negotiating, contracting for, arranging, and otherwise assisting in the purchase of APC from China. All of this was done without obtaining a broker authorization from the Department of State, after having attempted to secure an export license for the transaction.
(1) Recommending courses of action to Avibras on obtaining the APC from the PRC and assisting in arranging meetings with suppliers during a planned trip to the PRC, thereby negotiating for, arranging for, and otherwise assisting in and facilitating the purchase of APC by Avibras and the transfer of the APC from the PRC to Brazil;
(2) IPI finalizing an arrangement to supply Avibras with APC manufactured in the PRC thereby facilitating the manufacture and intended export of a foreign defense article from the PRC to Brazil on behalf of Avibras;
(3) IPI arranging for shipment of APC from the PRC to Brazil on behalf of Avibras;
(4) IPI issuing Dalian the final specifications for the APC thereby facilitating, on behalf of Avibras, the manufacture of the APC;
(5) IPI providing a down payment to Dalian to enable Dalian to begin manufacturing the APC thereby facilitating on behalf of Avibras Dalian’s manufacture of APC; and
(6) IPI arranging for Avibras to send a purchase order to ALIT with pricing specified by IPI for shipment of APC from the PRC to Avibras in Brazil demonstrating that IPI assisted in the export and transfer of APC from the PRC to Brazil on behalf of Avibras.
As stated earlier, IPI registered with the DOS as a broker in March, 2015. Such registration implies that IPI understood the requirements of the ITAR, particularly related to brokering. IPI then applied for a DSP5 permanent export license for unclassified materials and technical data in July, 2015 in connection with the sale of the APC material to Avibras, listing itself as the manufacturer and ALIT, China as an intermediary party. Apply for a DSP-5 license implied that the APC was being exported from the United States to Brazil, not the transfer from China to Brazil of APC. The DOS rejected the DSP-5 application seeking an explanation on the roles of the parties. In a resubmission of the DSP-5 license, in August, 2015, ALIT was no longer listed, but IPI was still listed as the manufacturer. The application was DENIED because it was not consistent with U.S. national security and foreign policy objectives. This was because China is an ITAR 126.1 sanctioned country. The facts described herein were described in a Directed Disclosure response by IPI to DOS. (meaning that IPI did not voluntarily report these actions to the DOS).
IPI was charged with 3 violations of the ITAR, count one – unauthorized brokering without a license, counts 2 and 3, misrepresentation or omission of facts in an export control document.
DOS determined that IPI’s unauthorized brokering activities demonstrated a disregard for its export compliance responsibilities.
IPI was fined $850,000 by the Department of State, required to appoint a Special Compliance Officer, complete a Classification Review, obtain an Audit by an outside auditor, allow onsite reviews by the Department of State and obtain export compliance training, among other remedial measures. The fine and remedial measures are significant for a small company with less than 100 employees.
Provided below is guidance to assist your company’s compliance with the ITAR’s brokering requirements found at § 129 of the ITAR.
The first step is registration with the Department of State specifically as a broker. It is a precondition for applying for broker prior approval licenses (when needed). Registration is required for only one brokering activity. Registration as a broker is separate from registration as a manufacturer or export.
Pursuant to §129.3, the following persons must register as a broker:
The ITAR at §129.3(b) includes the following exemptions from the broker registration requirements:
Before you register as a broker, you need to know who the ITAR defines as a broker and how it defines brokering activities. The ITAR at §129.2(a) defines who a broker is as follows:
The key point to remember regarding the ITAR’s definition of a broker is that it only captures foreign persons when they are located in the U.S. or foreign person located outside the United States where the foreign person is owned or controlled by a U.S. Person. Therefore, most foreign persons are NOT subject to the ITAR’s brokering regulations and do NOT need to register as a broker.
The next step is to define what constitutes what the ITAR considers is brokering as it may differ from the traditional brokering activities. The ITAR at §129.2(a) defines brokering activity as follows:
As you can see, a company can perform a brokering activity that does not involve the export from the United States of ITAR controlled technical data, hardware or defense services. In IPI’s case it was the transfer of material described in the ITAR’s U.S. Munitions List from China to Brazil at the heart of the broker violation.
“Any action on behalf of another” is broad and applicable to any actions that facilitate the manufacture, export, permanent import, transfer, reexport, or retransfer of a U.S. or foreign defense article or defense service. The phrase “any action” has been interpreted to mean several different things, for instance:
To determine if the activities your company engages in are brokering activities pursuant to the ITAR, first ask yourself, is your company assisting in the transaction in the following types of administrative activities as referenced in §129.2(b)(2):
If your company is performing any of the administrative activities referenced above, it is not performing a brokering activity.
The following are also not brokering activities per §129.2(b)(2):
If the activities your company engages in aren’t listed above, ask yourself is this transaction related to the prospective sale and/or export or import (as applicable) of U.S. or foreign origin ITAR regulated (or enumerated) hardware, technical data or services, and are on behalf of another party, U.S. or foreign? If your answer is yes, ask yourself, is my company taking any of the following actions:
If you answer yes to any of the above, brokering is occurring and a broker license will be required from the Department of State prior to ANY brokering activity taking place, for the articles listed below pursuant to §129.4(a)(2), if listed on the USML or the USMIL and for any foreign origin defense articles listed on the USML or listed on the USMIL, unless a license exemption is available:
If you determine that your company is brokering and requires prior approval brokering authorization, the next step of the process is to determine if any of the ITAR’s brokering license exemptions apply to your transaction. The ITAR’s brokering license exemptions are found at §129.5(a) and §129.5(b).
Pursuant to §129.5(a), brokering activities undertaken for an agency of the U.S. government pursuant to a contract between the broker and that agency are exempt from the requirement for approval provided that:
Pursuant to §129.5(b), brokering activities regarding a foreign defense article or defense service are exempt from the requirement for approval when arranged wholly within and destined exclusively for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, any member country of that organization, Australia, Israel, Japan, New Zealand, or the Republic of Korea, except in the case of the defense articles or defense services specified in § 129.4(a)(2) (see above), for which a broker license is required.
In order to use the broker license exemptions at §§ 129.5(a) and 129.5(b), pursuant to §129.5(c), brokers engaging in brokering activities described in §§129.5(a) or (b) are not exempt from obtaining a broker license from the Department of State if:
If your company is performing brokering activities and does not meet the requirements of the broker license exemptions referenced above, your company will need to submit a broker license (DS4294) to the Department of State, after it has secured a Broker registration code and before it undertakes any brokering activity. Below are the steps to file a broker license request:
Provided the defense articles, technical data or defense services are U.S. origin, and not described in ITAR §129.4, no prior brokering approval is required, unless a sanctioned country or party is involved. If no prior brokering approval is required, the broker is required to report the brokering activity specifics with each annual broker registration renewal.
As you will now conclude, the ITAR brokering regulations are complex and compliance is critical to avoid fines and compliance remedial measures as described for IPI. Some key points to remember are:
Need help?? Contact our expert export consultants and attorneys for assistance at 703-847-5801 or by email at info@fdassociates.net.
[1] China is an ITAR 126.1 arms sanctioned country
[2] ITAR Regulated = Controlled by the ITAR.
[3] ITAR Enumerated = Foreign origin equipment, no U.S. content, included in the ITAR’s United States Munitions List (USML) or the ATF’s United States Munitions Import List (USMIL).
ITAR Brokering – The Good, The Bad and the Ugly Read More »
ABC Company is registered with the Department of State as a manufacturer of defense articles. During the company annual registration renewal process, the ABC Company office administrator assigned to prepare the registration renewal for signature by the senior corporate officer identified that ABC Company had in the preceding 12 months since the last registration renewal moved and changed their name due to a corporate rebranding effort.
In the DECCS DS-2032 registration form, as ABC Company attempts to prepare the renewal, they find that they cannot make these changes because the name and address are greyed out on the application.
What are they doing wrong?
Is it administrative? Or is there a regulatory compliance matter that they have failed to comply with?
ABC Company is experiencing both an administrative issue and a compliance issue.
There is an administrative issue because the name and address blocks on the renewal form are greyed out; the DECCS system will not allow for these changes to be made on the renewal form. A registration amendment must be filed to change these details on the DS-2032.
There is a compliance issue because a change in company name and address requires ABC Company to notify DDTC of the changes under 22 C.F.R. § 122.4. By failing to notify DDTC, ABC Company has found themselves to be in non-compliance with the ITAR.
22 C.F.R. § 122.4 states that within 5 days of the event, or 60 days in advance, written notification must be made to DDTC by the senior officer of the registrant of that change.
As exports consultants, we routinely discover that our ITAR registered clients have failed to properly notify the Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls and Compliance (“DDTC”) of material changes to their company information. We learn of this when asking our clients to verify the accuracy of the information contained in the current DS2032 filing made 1 year earlier. Name changes, address changes, owners/officer and ownership changes are significant material changes that should be managed within your company with an eye towards making all notifications within the 5-day post event notice timeline. Failure to notify the Department of State signals that your company doesn’t have a pulse on this administrative obligation. If your company is not managing its registration within the Department of State ITAR requirements and compliance guidelines[1], what else is your company not compliant with?
All companies and organizations involved in ITAR-regulated manufacturing and exporting must have a valid registration with DDTC. Filing a registration with DDTC annually and receiving approval is the first step in ensuring your company avoids any ITAR related compliance violations.
Maintaining a valid registration is the second step. Maintenance of your registration is more involved than submitting a renewal application each year and submitting the DDTC renewal fee payment (see below for a recent update on fees). All DDTC registered companies are required to submit notification to the Department of State of certain changes to the company information listed on your registration statement. This requirement is stipulated in 22 C.F.R. § 122.4(a)[2].
22 C.F.R. § 122.4(a) requires notification to DDTC within 5 days of the event of any change to the eligibility and/or conviction status of those individuals or entities listed on the registration statement. This includes indictment or otherwise charged (i.e. by criminal information in lieu of indictment) for or conviction of violating any of the U.S. criminal statutes listed in ITAR 120.6 or foreign criminal law on exportation of defense articles where conviction of such law carries a minimum term of imprisonment greater than 1 year; or becomes ineligible to contract with, or to receive a license or other approval from any agency of the U.S.G.
22 C.F.R. § 122.4(a) also requires 5-day notification to DDTC if there is a change in the registrant’s name or address, organizational structure, ownership of control of the company, establishment, acquisition, or divestment of a subsidiary company, or any change to the board of directors, senior officers, partners, or owners.
22 C.F.R. § 122.4(b)[3] requires notification to DDTC 60 days prior to an intended sale or transfer of ownership or control of the registered company to a foreign person or entity. The 60-day notification does not relieve the requirement to notify the DDTC of the sale or transfer (5-day notice) after the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) review is complete, or to secure export licenses for any possible export of technical information during the due diligence process.
22 C.F.R. § 122.4(c)[4] requires notification to DDTC within 5 days of the event to any merger, acquisition, or divestiture of a registrant. The details of the transaction should be provided in the notification along with all licenses and agreements that will be affected by the change. Following notification to DDTC, the registrant must subsequently receive approval of the transaction.
On June 26, 2023, The Department of State’s IT Modernization Team deployed the new “Renewal Fee Details” functionality to the DECCS Registration application. This feature will only be visible to Registration application users and affect small companies who fall into the Tier 3 (submitters of more than 10 export license applications) with a reduced registration fee.
Registration tiers are based on the number of license applications submitted by the registrant. Tier 1 registrants are those submitting an initial registration application, registrants who have not submitted any license applications during the preceding 12 months, and non-profit registrants. The set fee for Tier 1 registrants is $2,250. Tier 2 registrants are those renewing their registration who have submitted 1-10 license applications during the preceding 12 months. The set fee for Tier 2 registrants is $2,750. Tier 3 registrants are those renewing their registration who have submitted more than 10 license applications during the preceding 12 months. The fee for Tier 3 registrations is based at $2,750 and increases $250 for every license application after the 10th application.
Provided the above criteria are met, users will see a new “Renewal Fee Details” button in their Registration dashboard in DECCS when there are 90 days or less before the expiration date. Selecting this button will display a pop-up window featuring additional details and information on how the renewal fee was calculated. Users will now be able to see the following information consolidated into the new Renewal Fee Details window:
Within this pop-up window, users will be presented with a “Download Licenses” button which generates a .csv file of all licenses considered when calculating the renewal fee charged by DDTC. This .csv file will include the case number, license type, approval date, and license value of all licenses “Approved” or “Approved with Provisos” within the license period date range that were used in the calculation of the renewal fee.
ITAR registered companies must remain vigilant in maintaining the accuracy of their registrations with The Department of State. Do not skip the second step of your ITAR registration.
[1]https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_kb_article_page&sys_id=4f06583fdb78d300d0a370131f961913
[2] § 122.4 Notification of changes in information furnished by registrants. (a) A registrant must, within five days of the event, provide to the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls a written notification, signed by a senior officer (e.g., chief executive officer, president, secretary, partner, member, treasurer, general counsel), if: (1) Any of the persons referred to in § 122.2(b) is indicted or otherwise charged (e.g., by criminal information in lieu of indictment) for or convicted of violating any of the U.S. criminal statutes enumerated in § 120.6 of this subchapter or violating a foreign criminal law on exportation of defense articles where conviction of such law carries a minimum term of imprisonment of greater than 1 year, or becomes ineligible to contract with, or to receive a license or other approval to export or temporarily import defense articles or defense services from any agency of the U.S. Government; or (2) There is a change in the following information contained in the Statement of Registration: (i) Registrant's name; (ii) Registrant's address; (iii) Registrant's legal organization structure; (iv) Ownership or control; (v) The establishment, acquisition, or divestment of a U.S. or foreign subsidiary or other affiliate who is engaged in manufacturing defense articles, exporting defense articles or defense services; or (vi) Board of directors, senior officers, partners, or owners.
[3] (b) A registrant must notify the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls by registered mail at least 60 days in advance of any intended sale or transfer to a foreign person of ownership or control of the registrant or any entity thereof. Such notice does not relieve the registrant from obtaining the approval required under this subchapter for the export of defense articles or defense services to a foreign person, including the approval required prior to disclosing technical data. Such notice provides the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls with the information necessary to determine whether the authority of § 38(g)(6) of the Arms Export Control Act regarding licenses or other approvals for certain sales or transfers of defense articles or data on the U.S. Munitions List should be invoked (see § 126.1(e) of this subchapter).
[4] (c) The new entity formed when a registrant merges with another company or acquires, or is acquired by, another company or a subsidiary or division of another company shall advise the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls of the following: (1) The new firm name and all previous firm names being disclosed; (2) The registration number that will survive and those that are to be discontinued (if any); (3) The license numbers of all approvals on which unshipped balances will be shipped under the surviving registration number, since any license not the subject of notification will be considered invalid; and (4) Amendments to agreements approved by the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls to change the name of a party to those agreements. The registrant must provide to the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls a signed copy of such an amendment to each agreement signed by the new U.S. entity, the former U.S. licensor and the foreign licensee, within 60 days of this notification, unless an extension of time is approved by the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls. Any agreement not so amended may be considered invalid.
The Second Step in ITAR Registration Read More »
Jenny Hahn, President
Your company manufactures defense articles and has been told that in order to conduct any international business such as marketing the defense articles or actually making a sale and selling hardware, software or services, you must first be registered with the Department of State as a precursor to applying for any ITAR export license. Then you learn that the company must have someone sign the ITAR license application and that person is called the “ITAR Empowered Official”.
Sounds simple and administrative. Anyone in the company should be able to fulfill this function, right?
Actually, who the company designates as the ITAR Empowered Official is a very important first step in the company trade compliance program. The ITAR Empowered Official is responsible to meet the conditions set forth in the ITAR for this position and in many small companies the ITAR Empowered Official is also responsible for the company trade compliance program.
If you have been “selected” or “volunteered” for the role of ITAR Empowered Official, it is important to first know what the ITAR states your qualifications should be. The Department of State often asks about the qualifications of the persons in your company designated as the trade compliance personnel including the ITAR Empowered Official. Selection is key.
(a) Empowered Official means a U.S. person who:
(1) Is directly employed by the applicant or a subsidiary in a position having authority for policy or management within the applicant organization; and
(2) Is legally empowered in writing by the applicant to sign license applications or other requests for approval on behalf of the applicant; and
(3) Understands the provisions and requirements of the various export control statutes and regulations, and the criminal liability, civil liability and administrative penalties for violating the Arms Export Control Act and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations; and
(4) Has the independent authority to:
(i) Inquire into any aspect of a proposed export, temporary import, or brokering activity by the applicant;
(ii) Verify the legality of the transaction and the accuracy of the information to be submitted; and
(iii) Refuse to sign any license application or other request for approval without prejudice or other adverse recourse.
U.S. Person – The ITAR defines “Person” as a natural person or a corporation, business association, partnership, society, trust, or any other entity, organization or group, including governmental entities. A U.S. person meets the “Person” definition, and is a citizen of the United States, a lawful permanent resident a.k.a. green card holder or a person here in the US on a protected status (religious or political asylum).
Directly employed by the applicant or a subsidiary – other than stating the obvious, this means that external resources such as your outside counsel, consultant, or past ITAR Empowered official who retires and consults back to the company part time on a 1099, cannot fulfill this role.
In a position having authority for policy or management within the applicant organization - Typically Directors, Managers, Vice Presidents and Presidents are some of the titles associated with the person fulfilling this role. If your title is contracts administrator, shipping clerk, administrative assistant, it suggests that the role you play in the company does not carry the level of responsibility or authority for policy or management to meet the threshold to be designated as the ITAR Empowered Official.
Is legally empowered in writing by the applicant to sign license applications or other requests for approval on behalf of the applicant - A letter is required from the Key Senior Officer (the person who signed the registration statement with the Department of State) to you designating you formally as the company ITAR empowered official. If you are at a subsidiary location, the letter should specify that you are limited to signing authority for your location only. Corporate empowerment letters can simply restate the ITAR definition at §120.25 or they can be more expansive articulating the responsibilities of the ITAR Empowered Official for the company trade compliance program or responsibilities that person may also hold. Each ITAR Empowered Official should maintain this letter in their files, Human Resources should also maintain it in the personnel file and the corporate books should maintain a copy.
Understands the provisions and requirements of the various export control statutes and regulations-
This means the ITAR Empowered Official should be able to do more than spell ITAR! It is expected that you will have had training in the International Traffic In Arms Regulations so that you can assert that you understand the regulations. But that is not enough. The ITAR references various export control statutes and regulations. Related regulations include the Foreign Trade Regulations, which every ITAR hardware export transaction interfaces with; the Office of Foreign Assets Controls, which maintains a list of persons and companies and countries that require separate approvals to make exports to from what the ITAR or EAR may impose; the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, that prohibits the making of payments or other gifts to influence a sale to a government (bribe); and the Export Administration Regulations that regulates the items that were once ITAR but moved over the last few years as a result of Export Control Reform, along with truly commercial or dual use items. That’s a lot of regulations you should be familiar with!
And the criminal liability, civil liability and administrative penalties for violating the Arms Export Control Act and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations- It is critically important that as the ITAR Empowered Official, you know what the fines and penalties are for willful a.k.a. criminal violations and those unwitting inadvertent mistakes made by the company. The ITAR Empowered Official and the company should understand what the possible outcomes could be for the company and responsible individuals in terms of jail time, denial of export privileges and fines as well as understanding the overall financial costs the company could have as a result of export violations not to mention the potential to lead to repercussions in government contracts including suspension or debarment.
Regular training of the ITAR Empowered Official to understand the civil and criminal penalties is necessary. Penalties are updated on a periodic basis and adjusted for inflation.
Has the independent authority to:
Based on the criteria enumerated in the ITAR to fulfill this role, the ITAR Empowered Official should be a person within the company that has knowledge about the regulations, understand the scope of the regulations, the penalties if not abided by, the respect of company employees to follow the ITAR Empowered Official lead and understanding and buy-in by management that no one can override any unfavorable decision made by the ITAR Empowered Official concerning a pending export transaction.
This role is often entered into by employees who are volunteered for the position because they are available or because they heard about the ITAR on their last job. The requirements to fulfill the ITAR Empowered Official position is much more demanding and carries with it significant expectations by the Department of State regarding this responsibility and how the company ensures that it selects qualified candidates. The company is expected to ensure that the ITAR Empowered Official receive regular training regarding the export regulations and criminal and civil penalties.
If you read this article and questioned your qualifications, or thought you might need more training, join us for our ITAR Empowered Official classes in April and November! We discuss in detail the compliance roles ITAR Empowered Officials take on..
Should You Be The ITAR Empowered Official? Read More »
Enroll now for the three half-day live stream webinar/workshop focusing on requirements of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) for Empowered Officials and those personnel responsible for establishing and administering company export compliance plans and procedures.
This will be a top-down look at the ITAR from a compliance perspective, focused on compliance requirements for exporting defense articles, technical data, and defense services.
We will begin with an in-depth look at the role and responsibilities of Empowered Officials/compliance persons, including eligibility, brokering, record keeping, and reporting. We will discuss the key elements of a compliance program meeting Department of State expectations, including audit plans, training programs, voluntary disclosures, and exporting against specific ITAR license authorization types.
ITAR FUNdamentals or basics course recommended as a prerequisite to this training.
What our attendees are saying ...
“This was great, very informative and knowledgeable presenter.”
“ I would recommend FD’s training to my coworkers.”
“Very clear and effective. Knowledge of the subject clearly extensive:
“FD Associates plays a key role in my company’s export compliance success.”
Agenda and Registration via Check Payment
Workshop Date - August 23-25,2021
ITAR For The Empowered Official – Live Stream Webinar Read More »
This is a hands-on workshop for beginners or companies newly exposed to the ITAR conducted over 4 days in 4-hour segments via live stream/webinar. It is also a useful refresher for anyone needing to get up to speed with the latest changes to the ITAR or State Department requirements for licensing defense articles or defense services. The program will provide licensing and compliance personnel with practical insights into the requirements of the ITAR. It will include interactive discussions and exercises designed to assist attendees in understanding the day-to-day application of the ITAR.
The Powerpoint presentation, handouts, and current ITAR will be provided.
What our attendees are saying …
“It has been a very informative session. I really enjoyed and feel like a lot of knowledge was acquired.”
“I really liked the small group and interaction with everyone. Everything was laid out well along with the notes to relook at everything. Will come back for more training.”
“This seminar was very effective for me and I will recommend having my coworkers attend.”
“Course is well designed and presented. Intimate knowledge of the student businesses allows for more pointed information transfer which I found helpful.”
Agenda and Registration via Check Payment
Workshop Date – October 19-22, 2021
ITAR Fundamentals – Live Stream Webinar Read More »