LATEST EXPORT CONTROLS AND COMPLIANCE UPDATE OCTOBER 2025

This newsletter is a listing of the latest changes in export control regulations through October 31, 2025.  The newsletter is provided as a complimentary service to assist exporters with their ITAR and EAR export compliance responsibilities. It provides a summary of recent changes to export control regulations or other regulatory matters of interest that may impact your company’s international trade and export compliance functions. Call us at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net with questions or comments.

 

See also our “Latest Sanctions Fines & Penalties” section below for an update on companies and

persons denied export privileges by the United States Government.

 

 

REGULATORY UPDATES

 

President – NEWSFLASH!

 

The President Suspends BIS’ Affiliate 50% Rule

 

November 1, 2025: As part of the President’s trade negotiations with China, the United States will suspend for one year, starting on November 10, 2025, the implementation of the interim final rule titled “Expansion of End-User Controls to Cover Affiliates of Certain Listed Entities” also known as the BIS Affiliate 50% Rule. FD Associates reminds U.S. exporters that they are still required to comply with OFAC’s 50% rule.

 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/11/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-strikes-deal-on-economic-and-trade-relations-with-china/

 

*******

U.S. Congress

 

Texas Congressman Introduced A Bill To Increase Penalties For Violations Of The Export Control Reform Act of 2018

 

October 30, 2025: Reps. Keith Self, R-Texas, and Michael McCaul, R-Texas, introduced a bill on October 28, 2025 that would increase the  civil penalties that may be imposed under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018. The legislation would set the fine for each violation at up to $1.2 million or four times the transaction value, whichever is greater. The current fine is up to $300,000 or twice the transaction value, whichever is greater.

 

Source: Export Compliance Daily.

*******

 

 

Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC)

 

ITAR Cambodia Licensing Policy Change, effective October 26, 2025

 

October 27, 2025: Based on Cambodia’s diligent pursuit of peace and security, the United States has removed the arms embargo on Cambodia.  DDTC is now reviewing license applications for ITAR-controlled activities on a case-by-case basis for Cambodia.

 

A regulatory change to remove Cambodia from the list of countries in ITAR § 126.1 is forthcoming.

 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/10/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-secures-peace-and-prosperity-in-malaysia/

 

*******

 

DDTC Name And Address Changes Posted To Website

 

October 1, 2025 through October 1, 2025: The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) posted the following name and/or address changes on its website at    

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_kb_article_page&sys_id=bd72ca0adbf8d30044f9ff621f961981:

  • Name Changes of Piaggio Aero Industries S.p.A. and Piaggio Aviation S.p.A. to Baykar Piaggio Aerospace S.p.A. due to acquisition; and
  • Name Change of Ultra PMES Limited to ESCO Maritime Solution Ltd. due to acquisition.

 

*******

 

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA)

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To South Korea

 

October 1, 2025: The State Department has made a determination approving a possible Foreign Military Sale to the Republic of Korea (South Korea) of AGM-65G2 Maverick Tactical Missiles and related equipment for an estimated cost of $34 million. South Korea has requested to buy forty-four (44) AGM-65G2 Maverick tactical missiles. The following non-Major Defense Equipment items will be included: U.S. Government and contractor engineering; technical, and logistics support services; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $34 million.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4320021/republic-of-korea-agm-65g2-maverick-tactical-missiles

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Canada

 

October 01, 2025 - The State Department has made a determination approving a possible Foreign Military Sale to the Government of Canada of M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems and related equipment for an estimated cost of $1.75 billion. The Defense Security Cooperation Agency delivered the required certification notifying Congress. The Government of Canada has requested to buy twenty-six (26) M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS); one hundred thirty-two (132) M31A2 Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS) Unitary pods with Insensitive Munitions Propulsion System (IMPS); one hundred thirty-two (132) M30A2 GMLRS Alternative Warhead (AW) pods with IMPS; thirty-two (32) M403 Extended Range (ER) GMLRS AW pods with IMPS; thirty-two (32) M404 ER GMLRS Unitary pods with IMPS; and sixty-four (64) M57 Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) pods. The following non-MDE items will be included: Low Cost Reduced Range Practice Rocket pods; interactive electronic technical manuals; integration support services; spare parts; tool kits; test equipment; contractor logistics support; training; training equipment; technical assistance; technical publications; transportation; Type 1 radios (AN/PRC-160 and AN/PRC-167); 7800I intercom equipment; Simple Key Loaders (SKL); U.S. Government and contractor technical, engineering, and logistics personnel services; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $1.75 billion.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4320012/canada-m142-high-mobility-artillery-rocket-systems

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Singapore

 

October 31, 2025: The State Department has made a determination approving a possible Foreign Military Sale to the Government of Singapore of Ebbing Air National Guard Base Facilities Construction Services and related equipment for an estimated cost of $353 million. The Defense Security Cooperation Agency delivered the required certification notifying Congress. The Government of Singapore has requested to buy construction services at Ebbing Air National Guard Base and other related elements of logistics and program support that will be added to a previously implemented case whose value was under the congressional notification threshold. The original Foreign Military Sales (FMS) case, valued at $27 million ($0 in MDE), included U.S. government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics support services, and other related elements of logistics and program support.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4327329/singapore-ebbing-air-national-guard-base-construction-services

 

*******

 

Department of Commerce – Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

 

BIS Issued A Statement Regarding Prioritized Review Of License Applications During U.S. Government Shutdown

 

October 2025: During the lapse in appropriations, BIS and its interagency partners will prioritize review of license applications submitted through the SNAP-R system that are urgently required to protect U.S. national security and the safety of life and property (for example, exports in support of U.S. military operations and those of our allies and partners around the world).

 

To request expedited processing of your application, please note in the “Additional Information” block that priority processing is requested during a lapse in appropriations and include a brief justification for priority processing. You should also send an email to EmergencyLicense@bis.doc.gov for both new license submissions, as well as licenses previously submitted, with a justification for priority processing, noting any nexus to urgent U.S. national security priorities or the safety of life and property.

https://www.bis.gov/about-bis/contact-us

LATEST SANCTIONS FINES & PENALTIES

 

This section of our newsletter provides information on the latest sanctions, fines and penalties for export violations or matters of non-compliance with the ITAR or EAR issued by the US government enforcement agencies. It is provided as a service to exporters and associates of FD Associates to remind them of the importance of extreme due diligence in all international trade and export compliance matters, particularly those involving exports subject to the ITAR or the EAR. Don't let this happen to you or your company! Call us with questions or concerns at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net.

 

Fines and Penalties

 

Enforcement Of BIS’ 50% Rule

 

October 30, 2025: The Administration has signaled that it may not waste time in enforcing the Bureau of Industry and Security’s new 50% rule, said Gavin Proudley, head of third-party risk proposition at Dow Jones, during the International Compliance Professionals Association's fall conference this week in Texas.

 

Asked whether he believes BIS will retroactively enforce the new restrictions, which took effect when they were released Sept. 29, Proudley responded . . . “we have had conversations with representatives of the administration or BIS, and the answer is: The rule is there to be enforced.”

 

He compared potential BIS enforcement of the rule to how the Office of Foreign Assets Control enforces its 50% rule, which applies sanctions to any non-designated entity that's majority-owned by a sanctioned entity. With OFAC, there isn’t “a whole lot of focus on whether or not you had not complied with the minutiae of the law. The focus was more on, you're doing business with a [Specially Designated National]," Proudley said. . . .

 

Proudley added that he expects BIS to “look under every stone” if it finds that a company violated the 50% rule, so businesses should make sure they’re aware of every instance in which they may not be in compliance. “That's where this will become important, when in the context of an investigation, multiple issues are found.”

 

In addition, he said the BIS rule could lead other governments to impose similar restrictions. The U.K. and the EU also have in place a version of OFAC’s 50% rule for entities they sanction, and China has said it will reject export license applications for certain critical goods to companies on the country’s export control list and their majority-owned affiliates.  . . .

 

“I think that other jurisdictions will sort of mirror this approach as well,” Proudley said. “This ownership and control issue, this challenge of ownership and control, which is a research challenge, is here to stay. I think we should expect escalation globally. I think the pace of all of this will increase, and I think other jurisdictions are going to come in.”

 

Source: Export Compliance Daily.

 

Editors note: The BIS50% rule is in effect from September 29, 2025 to November 10, 2025. After November 10, 2025, until reimplementation in a year, is the optimal time for U.S. exporters to evaluate their existing programs and prepare for the future. Exporter should conduct the necessary due diligence background on customers, intermediaries and end users to understand their upstream beneficial owners and assess the transaction thru the posing a possible risk of diversion lens and consider what these relationships would look like in the future if the rule is reimplemented.

 

Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

 

October 1, 2025: BIS reached an Administrative Enforcement Settlement with Luminultra Technologies, Inc. (Luminultra), for acting with knowledge and exporting three PhotonMaster luminometers and twenty-five aqueous test kits, all of which are categorized as EAR99 items, but which required authorization for export to Iran under § 746.7(e) of the EAR. In purchase emails, Luminultra acknowledged not only that the products were going to Iran, but also that sending the luminometers and test kits violated the EAR.

 

Luminultra entered into a Settlement Agreement with BIS that:

 

  • Assessed a civil penalty in the amount of $685,051;
  • Complete an export compliance audit by March 30, 2026 and then annually for three years;
  • All Luminultra employees must receive export compliance training;
  • For a period of three (3) years from the date of the Order, Luminultra shall be made subject to a suspended three-year denial of its export privileges under the Regulations ("denial”). As authorized by Section 766.18(c) of the EAR, such denial shall be suspended during this three-year probationary period and shall thereafter be waived, provided that:
    • Luminultra makes full and timely payment of the civil penalty in accordance with the paragraphs above;
    • Luminultra has fully and timely complied with the audit and training requirements in accordance with the paragraphs above;
    • Luminultra agrees to answer truthfully all questions posed to the defendant by Special Agents of BIS about the defendant’s export activities during the three-year probationary period.

 

https://www.bis.gov/media/documents/luminultra-technologies-inc-9-30-2025.pdf

 

*******

 

October 1, 2025: BIS imposed an administrative penalty on Hallewell Ventures, Ltd (Hallewell), of the British Virgin Islands for reexporting a controlled item, specifically a Bombardier Global 7500 Aircraft bearing Serial Number 70092, from the Maldives to Russia without the required BIS license.

 

Hallewell entered into a Settlement Agreement with BIS that:

 

  • Assessed a civil penalty in the amount of $374,474.

 

https://www.bis.gov/media/documents/hallewell-ventures-ltd-9-30-2025-1.pdf

 

*******

 

October 3, 2025: 90 Fed. Reg. 48092: The Office of Export Enforcement (“OEE”) renewed the temporary denial order (“TDO”) of export privileges for URAL Airlines JSC of Russia for one (1) year, initially issued on September 20, 2024. The renewal of this order is necessary in the public interest to prevent an imminent violation of the Regulations and that renewal for an extended period is appropriate because URAL Airlines JSC has engaged in a pattern of repeated, ongoing and/or continuous apparent violations of the EAR.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/10/03/2025-19436/ural-airlines-jsc-utrenniy-lane-1-g-yekaterinburg-russia-620025-order-renewing-temporary-denial-of

 

*******

 

October 31, 2025: 90 Fed. Reg. 48938: The Office of Export Enforcement (“OEE”) extended the Temporary Denial Order of Mahan Airways’ export privileges for a period of 1 year on the ground that issuance of the order was necessary in the public interest to prevent an imminent violation of the Regulations. The order also named as denied persons Blue Airways, of Yerevan, Armenia (“Blue Airways of Armenia”), as well as the “Balli Group Respondents,” namely, Balli Group PLC, Balli Aviation, Balli Holdings, two of its officers, Blue Sky One Ltd., Blue Sky Two Ltd., Blue Sky Three Ltd., Blue Sky Four Ltd., Blue Sky Five Ltd., and Blue Sky Six Ltd., all of the United Kingdom.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/10/31/2025-19727/order-renewing-order-temporarily-denying-export-privileges

 

*******

 

October 29, 2025: Peter Williams, 39, an Australian national, pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court in connection with selling his employer’s trade secrets to a Russian cyber-tools broker, the Justice Department announced.

 

Williams pleaded to two counts of theft of trade secrets. The material, stolen over a three-year period from the U.S. defense contractor where he worked, was comprised of national-security focused software that included at least eight sensitive and protected cyber-exploit components. Those components were meant to be sold exclusively to the U.S. government and select allies. Williams sold the trade secrets to a Russian cyber-tools broker that publicly advertises itself as a reseller of cyber exploits to various customers, including the Russian government.

 

Each of the charges carries a statutory maximum of 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000 or twice the pecuniary gain or loss of the offense.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-general-manager-us-defense-contractor-pleads-guilty-selling-stolen-trade-secrets

 

*******

 

October 30, 2025: Canyon Anthony Amarys, 28, of Alamogordo, New Mexico, was arrested on October 28 in connection with his indictment for the attempted violation of the Export Control Reform Act.

 

According to the indictment, in February 2025, at an in-person meeting between Amarys and someone he believed to be a Russian intelligence agent, Amarys signed a one-page agreement in order to confirm his covert relationship with a Russian intelligence service.  In addition, as part of that relationship, Amarys agreed to photograph a military installation on Fort Riley, Kansas, and to procure a helicopter radio for use by the Russian military.

 

In March 2025, after purchasing the helicopter radio, Amarys traveled to Kansas in order to retrieve the radio and export it to a purported recipient in Romania.  In doing so, Amarys communicated with a person he believed to be a Russian intelligence agent and confirmed his understanding that the radio would in fact be illegally diverted to Russia.

 

Pursuant to a court-authorized search, investigators recovered the radio that Amarys had sought to illegally export to Russia.  Under U.S. export laws and regulations, the export of this controlled item without a license from the U.S. Department of Commerce was unlawful.  Amarys understood that his shipment of the radio abroad was illegal and told the person he believed to be a Russian intelligence agent that he had researched export regulations in anticipation of their meeting in February 2025.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/national-guardsman-arrested-and-charged-export-violation

 

Sanctions

 

Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

 

October 9, 2025: 90 Fed Reg 48193: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) added 29 entries (26 entities and 3 addresses) to the Entity List under the destinations of People's Republic of China (China) (19), Turkey (9), and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) (1). These entities have been determined by the U.S. Government to be acting contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States.

 

China

  • Address 16;
  • Address 17;
  • Address 18;
  • Arrow China Electronics Trading Co., Ltd.;
  • Arrow Electronics (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd.;
  • Beijing Kevins Technology Development Co., Ltd.;
  • Beijing Plenary Technology Co., Ltd.;
  • Beijing Rageflight Technology Co., Ltd.;
  • Easy Fly Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd;
  • Feng Bao Electronic Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.;
  • Feng Bao Trading Hong Kong Ltd;
  • Gansu Shuili Hoisting Equipment Co., Ltd.;
  • Goodview Global;
  • Jinan Xin Yin Bo Electronic Equipment Co., Ltd.;
  • Schmidt & Co., (HK) Ltd.;
  • Shandong Xin Yin Bo IOT Technology Co., Ltd.;
  • Shanghai Bitconn Electronics Co., Ltd.;
  • Shanghai Langqing Electronic Technology Co.; and
  • Shanghai Sisheng Power Control Technology Co., Ltd.

 

Turkey:

  • Atadoruk Havacilik Savunma Sanayi Ticaret Limited Sirketi;
  • Business Metal Sanayi Ve Dis Ticaret Limited Sirketi;
  • DBC Makina Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.;
  • Ercetin Is Makinalari Yedek Parcalari Insaat Ve Dis Ticaret Limited Sirketi;
  • PMR Teknik Makine Ticaret Limited Sirketi;
  • Sisdoz Aritma Ve Pompa Teknolojileri Sanayi Ticaret Anonim Sirketi;
  • TGB Aviation;
  • UMS Ankara Kalibrasyon Mühendislik Müşavirlik Mümessillik Sanayi Ve Ticaret, Limited Sirketi; and
  • Yant Insaat Gida Turizm Sanayi Dis Ticaret Limited Sirketi.

 

United Arab Emirates:

  • Royal Impact Trading L.L.C.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/10/09/2025-19508/additions-to-the-entity-list

 

*******

 

Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

 

October 1, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated 21 entities and 17 individuals involved in networks that facilitate the acquisition of sensitive goods and technology for Iran’s Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics (MODAFL), as well as its missile and military aircraft production efforts.  These networks have assisted in activities including the procurement of technology for advanced surface-to-air missile systems and the illicit purchase of a U.S.-manufactured helicopter.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Bakouei, Ali of Iran;
  • Bouzary, Seyed Behzad, Essen of Iran and Germany;
  • Cai, Deshan, of China;
  • Dehghan Farsi, Mohamadreza, of Iran;
  • Farshchi, Mehdi, of Iran;
  • Fuladvand, Ali, of Iran;
  • Ghadir Zare Zaghalchi, Mohammad Reza, of Iran;
  • Heidari, Gholamhasan, of Iran;
  • Hoseini Munes, Sayyed Ahmad, of Iran;
  • Hou, Xueyuan, of China;
  • Hu, Yunlu, of China;
  • Kalvand, Ali, of Iran;
  • Lei, Guojian, of China;
  • Liu, Baojuan, of China;
  • Mira, Antonio Filipe Fortio, of Portugal;
  • Nili Ahmadabadi, Mehdi, of Iran;
  • Salimi, Amirhossein, of Iran;
  • Shafiian Azarkhavarani, Alireza, of Iran;
  • Shafiian Azarkhavarani, Fatemeh, of Iran;
  • Shayesteh, Mehdi Shirazi, of Iran; and
  • Sun, Zhaolan, of China.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Abzar-E Daghigh-E Taha Company, of Iran;
  • Andisheh Damavand International Technologies, of Iran;
  • Beh Joule Pars Commercial Engineering Company, of Iran;
  • Business United Unipessoal LDA, of Portugal;
  • Cabuk Calisan Tasimacilik Ve Endustri Makineleri Ticaret Limited, of Turkey;
  • Excellent Beijing Technology Development Company Limited, of China;
  • Hangzhou Jiepei Information Technology CO LTD, of China;
  • Hebei Senning Automated Equipment CO LTD, of China;
  • Innovia Electronic Technology CO Limited, of China;
  • Khazra Communications Technology Solutions, of Iran;
  • Longstone Technology CO Limited, of China;
  • Micro Device CO Limited, of China;
  • Pasargad Helicopter Company, of Iran;
  • Perfect Day CO SA, of Uruguay;
  • Rayming Technology, of China;
  • Rocket PCB Solution LTD, of China;
  • Shahid Hemmat Space Group, of Iran;
  • Star Management Group GMBH, of Germany;
  • Takta Fanavaran Rasa Company, of Iran;
  • Tamin Sanat Amen Company, of Iran;
  • UIY Inc, of China; and
  • Westcom Technology CO Limited, of China.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0270 and https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20251001

 

*******

 

October 6, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned eight Mexican individuals and 12 Mexico-based companies affiliated with the Sinaloa Cartel’s Los Chapitos faction. This network supplies illicit fentanyl precursor chemicals to the Sinaloa Cartel, a terrorist organization responsible for a significant portion of the deadly drugs trafficked into the United States.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Conde Uraga, Martha Emilia, of Mexico;
  • Favela Lopez, Francisco, of Mexico;
  • Favela Lopez, Jorge Luis, of Mexico;
  • Favela Lopez, Maria Gabriela, of Mexico;
  • Favela Lopez, Victor Andres, of Mexico;
  • Gallardo Garcia, Gilberto, of Mexico;
  • Lopez Araujo, Cesar Elias, of Mexico; and
  • Verdugo Araujo, Jairo, of Mexico.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Agrolaren, S.P.R. DE R.L. DE C.V., of Mexico;
  • Comercial Viosma Del Noroeste, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico;
  • Distribuidora De Productos Y Servicios Viand, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico;
  • Favela Pro, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico;
  • Favelab, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico;
  • Importaciones Y Nacional Marcerlab, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico;
  • Prolimph Quimicos En General, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico;
  • Proveedora De Servicios De Salud Mental Del Pacifico, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico;
  • Qui Lab, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico;
  • Roco Del Pacifico Inmobiliaria, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico; and
  • Storelab, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0272 and https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20251006

 

*******

 

October 9, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) took action against individuals and companies that assist the Iranian regime in evading U.S. sanctions, smuggling weapons, and engaging in widespread corruption in Iraq.  The Iranian regime relies on various Iraqi militia proxies, including U.S.-sanctioned foreign terrorist organization Kata’ib Hizballah, to penetrate Iraq’s security forces and economy.

 

These Iran-backed groups are not only responsible for the deaths of U.S. personnel but also conduct attacks against U.S. interests and those of our allies across the Middle East. The militias actively undermine the Iraqi economy, monopolizing resources through graft and corruption, and hinder the formation of a functioning Iraqi government that would make the region safer.

 

The targets include bankers abusing the Iraqi economy to launder money for Iran and a terrorist front company that provides support and services to Iraqi militia groups.  Treasury also took action against Iraq-based Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) assets that operate a source network that gathers information, including on U.S. forces.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Al Anssari, Ali Mohammed Ghulam Hussein, of Iraq;
  • Al Baidhani, Ali Meften Khafeef, of Iraq;
  • Al Baidhani, Aqeel Meften Khafeef, of Iraq;
  • Qahtan Al-Sa'idi, Hasan, of Iraq;
  • Qahtan Al-Sa'idi, Muhammad, of Iraq; and
  • SA'ID, Haytham Sabih, of Iraq.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Baladna For Agricultural Investments And Agricultural Services And Livestock Production And Food Production And Processing And Packaging And Packaging Of Foodstuffs Limited Liability, of Iraq; and
  • Muhandis General Company For Construction, Engineering, Mechanical, Agricultural, And Industrial Contracting, of Iraq.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0277 and https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20251009_33

 

*******

 

October 9, 2025:  The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) intensified its efforts against Iran’s petroleum and petrochemical exports by sanctioning over 50 individuals, entities, and vessels that facilitate Iranian oil and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) sales and shipments from Iran.  These actors have collectively enabled the export of billions of dollars’ worth of petroleum and petroleum products, providing critical revenue to the Iranian regime and its support for terrorist groups that threaten the United States.

 

This action targeted a network moving hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of Iranian LPG, along with nearly two dozen shadow fleet vessels, a China-based crude oil terminal, and an independent “teapot” refinery, which are key to Iran’s ability to export petroleum and petroleum products to generate significant revenue.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Bhatt, Niti Unmesh, of India;
  • Gu, Wenlong, of China;
  • Javiya, Piyush Maganlal, of India;
  • Kasat, Kamla Kanayalal, of India;
  • Kasat, Kunal Kanayalal, of India;
  • Kasat, Poonam Kunal, of India and Singapore;
  • Pula, Varun, of India;
  • Raja, Iyappan, of India;
  • Shrestha, Soniya, of India; and
  • Yavrucu, Aykut, of Turkey.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Abgo Trading Limited, of China;
  • Aby Plastik Ambalaj Ve Enerji Sanayi Ticaret Anonim Sirketi, of Turkey;
  • Aerilyn Shipping Inc., of Panama;
  • AIX Company Limited, of China;
  • Amita Petrochemical Trading L.L.C. of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Anglo Premier Shipping PTE. LTD., of Singapore;
  • B K Sales Corporation, of India;
  • Bertha Shipping Inc., of the Marshall Islands;
  • Blue Ocean Marine Company Limited, of China;
  • J. Shah And CO., of India;
  • Chemix Trading L.L.C., of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Chemovick Private Limited, of India;
  • Crimson Blue Trading Co., Limited, of China;
  • Dimond Town Shipping Company, of Ukraine and Liberia;
  • Dina Petrokimya Sanayi Ticaret Anonim Sirketi, of Turkey;
  • Erbium Trading L.L.C., of the Dubai, United Arab Emirates;
  • Evie Lines Inc., of the Marshall Islands;
  • Golden International FZE, of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Great Times Shipping Limited, of China;
  • Haresh Petrochem Private Limited, of India;
  • Hengyang Petrochemical Logistics Limited, of China;
  • Hozdra Group Limited, of China;
  • Indisol Marketing Private Limited, of India;
  • Jiangyin Foreversun Chemical Logistics Co., Ltd., of China;
  • Juliet Trading Limited, of China;
  • Kermanshah Petrochemical Industries Co., of Iran;
  • Logos Marine PTE. LTD., of Singapore;
  • Markan White Trading Crude Oil Abroad CO. L.L.C., of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Mikroteknik Kimyevi Maddeler Laboratuvar Malzemeleri Ve Cihazlari Sanayi Ticaret Limited Sirketi, of Turkey;
  • Mody Chem, of India;
  • Neowave Management CO., LTD, of the Marshall Islands;
  • Ocean Inc., of the Marshall Islands;
  • Paarichem Resources LLP, of India;
  • Qingdao Hexin United International Shipping Agency CO., LTD., of China;
  • Ravenala Trading Co., Limited, of China;
  • Rizhao Shihua Crude Oil Terminal CO., LTD., of China;
  • S E A Ship Management LLC, of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Shandong Jincheng Petrochemical Group CO., LTD., of China;
  • Shiv Texchem Limited, of India;
  • Sinoper Shipping CO, of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Skiathos Maritime And Trading SA, of Panama;
  • Slogal Energy DMCC, of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Soft Air General Trading L.L.C., of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Sullana Inc, Trust Company, of the Marshall Islands;
  • Tethis Shipping CO, of the Ukraine;
  • Titan Seaways LTD, of Liberia;
  • Vega Star Ship Management Private Limited, of India;
  • Yesil Basak Tarim Sanayi Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, of Turkey; and
  • Yu Hong De Company Limited, of China.

 

The following vessels have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • ADA; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9008108;
  • APS 9; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9360001;
  • Gale; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9294240;
  • Gas Dior; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9379404;
  • Gas Leader; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9114581;
  • Gas Marta; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9307748;
  • Gas Vision; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9115303;
  • Gas Zeina; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 8818843;
  • Hai Long Bravo; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9312353;
  • Loanna; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9251884;
  • Madestar; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9289726;
  • Max Star; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9134165;
  • Nepta; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9013701;
  • Pamir; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9208239;
  • Pioneer 92; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9340934;
  • PK Marit; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9235464;
  • PK Phoenix; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9326902;
  • Purdue Stellar; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9275658;
  • Sapphire Gas; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9320738;
  • Sea Hermes; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9031519;
  • Sea Opera; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9000883;
  • Siren II; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9337195;
  • Sona; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9005053;
  • Sullana; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9180152;
  • Tethis 7; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9251896;
  • Thanasis; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9239989;
  • Trima; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9252072;
  • Tulip; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 8912558;
  • Vita I; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9241114;
  • Voy; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9222443;
  • World Courage; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9289740;
  • World Performance; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9301005; and
  • World Progress; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9300996.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0275 and https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20251009

 

*******

 

October 14, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), in close coordination with the United Kingdom’s Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office (FCDO), took complementary actions against criminal networks responsible for targeting citizens of the United States and other allied nations through online scams and the laundering of stolen funds.

 

OFAC has imposed sweeping sanctions on 146 targets within the Prince Group Transnational Criminal Organization (Prince Group TCO), a Cambodia-based network led by Cambodian national Chen Zhi that operates a transnational criminal empire through online investment scams targeting Americans and others worldwide. In addition, FinCEN finalized a rule under section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act to sever the Cambodia-based financial services conglomerate, Huione Group, from the U.S. financial system.  For years, Huione Group has laundered proceeds of virtual currency scams and heists on behalf of malicious cyber actors.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

  • Chen, Xiao'er, of Saint Kitts and Nevis;
  • Chen, Xiuling, of Singapore;
  • Chen, Zhi, of China and Cambodia;
  • Chhay, Guy, of Cambodia;
  • Dara, Ing, of Cambodia;
  • Huang, Chieh, of Taiwan;
  • Lei, Bo, of China;
  • Li, Thet, of the United Kingdom, China and Cambodia;
  • Shih, Ting-yu, of Palau and Taiwan;
  • Tang, Nigel, of Singapore;
  • Wang, Guodan, of Palau and China;
  • Wang, Michelle Reishane, of Palau and Taiwan;
  • Wei, Qianjiang, of Cambodia, Vanuatu and China;
  • Yang, Jian, of China and Cyprus;
  • Yang, Yanming, of Thailand, Cambodia, Vanuatu and Palau;
  • Yeo, Sin Huat Alan, of Singapore and China;
  • Zhou, Yun, of China; and
  • Zhu, Zhongbiao of China and Cambodia.

 

See link below for a full list of entities that were also sanctioned.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0278 and https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20251014

 

*******

 

October 14, 2025: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued TCO General License 1, "Authorizing the Wind Down of Transactions Involving Certain Persons Blocked on October 14, 2025."

 

TCO Geneal License 1: All transactions prohibited by the Transnational Criminal Organizations Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 590 (TCOSR), that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind down of any transaction involving one or more of the following blocked entities are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time, November 13, 2025, provided that any payment to a blocked person is made into a blocked account, in accordance with the TCOSR:

(1) Prince Holding Group;

(2) Prince Bank Plc.;

(3) Prince Huan Yu Real Estate Cambodia Group Co., Ltd; or

(4) Any entity in which one or more of the above persons own, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest.

 

This general license does not authorize any transactions otherwise prohibited by the TCOSR, including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the TCOSR other than the blocked persons described above in this general license, unless separately authorized.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934681/download?inline

 

*******

 

October 17, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is sanctioning Dimitri Herard (Herard) for his support to the Haitian gang coalition, Viv Ansanm.  Also designated today is Kempes Sanon (Sanon), leader of the Bel Air gang, one of the constituent gangs in the Viv Ansanm alliance.  Viv Ansanm contributes to the violence and instability within Haiti.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

  • Herard, Dimitri, of Haiti; and
  • Sanon, Kempes, of Haiti.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0282 and https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20251017

 

*******

 

October 22, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) imposed further sanctions as a result of Russia’s lack of serious commitment to a peace process to end the war in Ukraine. These actions increase pressure on Russia’s energy sector and degrade the Kremlin’s ability to raise revenue for its war machine and support its weakened economy. The United States will continue to advocate for a peaceful resolution to the war, and a permanent peace depends entirely on Russia’s willingness to negotiate in good faith. Treasury will continue to use its authorities in support of a peace process.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Aktsionernoe Obshchestvo Kuibyshevskii Neftepererabatyvayushchii Zavod, of Russia;
  • AO Sibneftegaz, of Russia;
  • Bashneft Dobycha, of Russia;
  • CJSC Vankorneft, of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company East Siberian Oil And Gas Company, of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Grozneftegaz, of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Rospan International, of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Ryazan Oil Refinery Company, of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Samaraneftegas, of Russia;
  • JSC RN Nyaganneftegaz, of Russia;
  • Kharampurneftegaz, of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company Bashneft Polus, of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company Kynsko Chaselskoe Neftegaz, of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company Lukoil Perm, of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company RN Krasnodarneftegaz, of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company RN Purneftegaz, of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company RN Tuapse Oil Refinery, of Russia;
  • Lukoil AIK A Limited Liability Company, of Russia;
  • Lukoil Kaliningradmorneft, of Russia;
  • Lukoil OAO, of Russia;
  • Lukoil West Siberia Limited, of Russia;
  • OJSC Achinsk Refinery, of Russia;
  • OJSC Novokuybyshev Refinery, of Russia;
  • OJSC Orenburgneft, of Russia;
  • OJSC Samotlorneftegaz, of Russia;
  • OJSC Syzran Refinery, of Russia;
  • Open Joint-Stock Company Rosneft Oil Company, of Russia;
  • PJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz, of Russia;
  • Public Joint Stock Company Saratov Oil Refinery, of Russia;
  • Publichnoe Aktsionernoe Obschestvo Udmurtneft Imeni Vi Kudinova, of Russia;
  • RN Komsomolskiy Refinery LLC, of Russia;
  • RN Uvatneftegaz, of Russia;
  • RN-Yuganskneftegaz LLC, of Russia;
  • Russian Innovation Fuel And Energy Company, of Russia;
  • TAAS Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha LLC, of Russia; and
  • Uraloil, of Russia.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0290 and https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20251022

 

*******

 

October 22, 2025: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued Russia-related General License 124A, "Authorizing Petroleum Services and Other Transactions Related to the Caspian Pipeline Consortium and Tengizchevroil Projects;" Russia-related General License 126, "Authorizing the Wind Down of Transactions Involving Rosneft or Lukoil;" Russia-related General License 127, "Authorizing Certain Transactions Related to Debt or Equity of, or Derivative Contracts Involving, Rosneft or Lukoil;" and Russia-related General License 128, "Authorizing Certain Transactions Involving Lukoil Retail Service Stations Located Outside of Russia."

 

Russia-Related General License 124A, "Authorizing Petroleum Services and Other Transactions Related to the Caspian Pipeline Consortium and Tengizchevroil Projects": All transactions prohibited by the determination of January 10, 2025 made pursuant to section 1(a)(ii) of Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 (“Prohibition on Petroleum Services”) that are related to the Caspian Pipeline Consortium or Tengizchevroil projects are authorized.

 

All transactions prohibited by E.O. 14024 involving one or more of the following blocked persons that are related to the Caspian Pipeline Consortium or Tengizchevroil projects are authorized:

(1) Rosneft Oil Company;

(2) Public Joint-Stock Company Oil Company Lukoil; or

(3) Any entity in which one or more of the above persons own, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest.

 

This general license does not authorize any transactions otherwise prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR), including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the RuHSR, other than the blocked persons described above.

 

Russia-related General License 126, "Authorizing the Wind Down of Transactions Involving Rosneft or Lukoil": All transactions prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind down of any transaction involving one or more of the following blocked persons are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time, November 21, 2025, provided that any payment to a blocked person is made into a blocked account in accordance with the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR):

(1) Rosneft Oil Company;

(2) Public Joint-Stock Company Oil Company Lukoil; or

(3) Any entity in which one or more of the above persons own, directly or indirectly,

individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest.

 

This general license does not authorize:

(1) Any transactions prohibited by Directive 2 under E.O. 14024, Prohibitions Related to

Correspondent or Payable-Through Accounts and Processing of Transactions Involving Certain

Foreign Financial Institutions;

(2) Any transactions prohibited by Directive 4 under E.O. 14024, Prohibitions Related to

Transactions Involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of

the Russian Federation, and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation; or

(3) Any transactions otherwise prohibited by the RuHSR, including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the RuHSR other than the blocked persons described in paragraph (a) of this general license, unless separately authorized.

 

Russia-related General License 127, "Authorizing Certain Transactions Related to Debt or Equity of, or Derivative Contracts Involving, Rosneft or Lukoil": All transactions prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the divestment or transfer, or the facilitation of the divestment or transfer, of debt or equity issued or guaranteed by the following blocked entities (“Covered Debt or Equity”) to a non-U.S. person are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time, November 21, 2025:

(1) Rosneft Oil Company;

(2) Public Joint-Stock Company Oil Company Lukoil; or

(3) Any entity in which one or more of the above persons own, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest.

 

All transactions prohibited by E.O. 14024 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to facilitating, clearing, and settling trades of Covered Debt or Equity that were placed prior to 4:00 p.m. eastern daylight time, October 22, 2025 are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time, November 21, 2025.

 

All transactions prohibited by E.O. 14024 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind down of derivative contracts entered into prior to 4:00 p.m. eastern daylight time, October 22, 2025 that

(i) include a blocked person described above as a counterparty or

(ii) are linked to Covered Debt or Equity are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time, November 21, 2025, provided that any payments to a blocked person are made into a blocked account in accordance with the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR).

 

This general license does not authorize:

(1) U.S. persons to sell, or to facilitate the sale of, Covered Debt or Equity to, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked; or

(2) U.S. persons to purchase or invest in, or to facilitate the purchase of or investment in, directly or indirectly, Covered Debt or Equity, other than purchases of or investments in Covered Debt or Equity ordinarily incident and necessary to the divestment or transfer, or the facilitation of the divestment or transfer, of Covered Debt or Equity as described above in this general license.

 

This general license does not authorize:

(1) Any transactions prohibited by Directive 2 under E.O. 14024, Prohibitions Related to Correspondent or Payable-Through Accounts and Processing of Transactions Involving Certain Foreign Financial Institutions;

(2) Any transactions prohibited by Directive 4 under E.O. 14024, Prohibitions Related to Transactions Involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation; or

(3) Any transactions otherwise prohibited by the RuHSR, including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the RuHSR other than the blocked persons described above, unless separately authorized.

 

Russia-related General License 128, "Authorizing Certain Transactions Involving Lukoil Retail Service Stations Located Outside of Russia": All transactions prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the purchase of goods and services from, or the maintenance, operation, or wind down of Lukoil retail service stations located outside of the Russian Federation (“Lukoil Retail Service Stations”), are authorized through 12:01 eastern standard time, November 21, 2025, provided that any payment, directly or indirectly, to a blocked person—other than blocked Lukoil Retail Service Stations—is made into a blocked account in accordance with the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR).

 

Note: For the purpose of this general license, the term “Lukoil Retail Service Stations” means physical retail service stations located outside the Russian Federation and in existence on or before October 22, 2025 in which (1) Public Joint-Stock Company Oil Company Lukoil (“Lukoil”) has an interest, or

(2) any entity in which Lukoil owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest, has an interest.

 

This general license does not authorize:

(1) Any transactions prohibited by Directive 2 under E.O. 14024, Prohibitions Related to

Correspondent or Payable-Through Accounts and Processing of Transactions Involving Certain

Foreign Financial Institutions;

(2) Any transactions prohibited by Directive 4 under E.O. 14024, Prohibitions Related to

Transactions Involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of

the Russian Federation, and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation; or

(3) Any transactions otherwise prohibited by the RuHSR, unless separately authorized.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934701/download?inline and https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934706/download?inline and https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934711/download?inline and https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934716/download?inline

 

*******

 

October 24, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated Gustavo Francisco Petro Urrego (Gustavo Petro), the President of Colombia, pursuant to counternarcotics-related authorities.  In addition, OFAC also designated several supporters of Gustavo Petro, namely his wife, his son, and a close associate.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Alcocer Garcia, of Colombia;
  • Benedetti Villaneda, of Colombia;
  • Petro Burgos, of Colombia; and
  • Petro Urrego, of Colombia.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0292 and https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20251024

 

*******

 

October 29, 2025: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is issuing Russia-related General License 129, "Authorizing Transactions Involving Rosneft Deutschland GmbH and RN Refining & Marketing GmbH."

 

Russia-related General License 129, "Authorizing Transactions Involving Rosneft Deutschland GmbH and RN Refining & Marketing GmbH.": All transactions prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR), involving Rosneft Deutschland GmbH (RN Germany) or RN Refining & Marketing GmbH (RN Refining & Marketing), or any entity in which RN Germany or RN Refining & Marketing own, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest, are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, April 29, 2026.

 

This general license does not authorize any transactions otherwise prohibited by the RuHSR, including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the RuHSR, including any other blocked affiliates of Rosneft Oil Company, other than the blocked persons described above in this general license, unless separately authorized.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20251029 and https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934726/download?inline

 

*******

 

October 29, 2025: OFAC issued one amended Frequently Asked Question, FAQ 1216.

 

Question: 1216: What action has Treasury taken with regard to the provision of petroleum services to Russia?

Answer: In line with G7 efforts to reduce Russian revenues from energy, on January 10, 2025, Treasury issued a determination pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 prohibiting petroleum services to Russia. See The Determination Pursuant to Sections 1(a)(ii), 1(b), and 5 of E.O. 14071, Prohibition on Petroleum Services ("the Petroleum Services Determination"). This determination prohibits the exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, from the United States, or by a United States person, wherever located, to any person located in the Russian Federation of petroleum services. The Petroleum Services Determination took effect at 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time on February 27, 2025. See FAQ 1217 for additional information.

OFAC expects to issue regulations defining petroleum services to include services related to the exploration, drilling, well completion, production, refining, processing, storage, maintenance, transportation, purchase, acquisition, testing, inspection, transfer, sale, trade, distribution, or marketing of petroleum, including crude oil and petroleum products, as well as any activities that contribute to Russia's ability to develop its domestic petroleum resources, or the maintenance or expansion of Russia's domestic production and refining. This would include services related to natural gas as a byproduct of oil production in Russia.

On October 22, 2025, OFAC issued GL 124A. In addition to continuing to authorize transactions prohibited by the Petroleum Services Determination related to the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) and Tengizchevroil, GL 124A also authorizes otherwise prohibited transactions related to the CPC and Tengizchevroil involving Lukoil, Rosneft, or any entity in which Lukoil or Rosneft owns, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest. Additionally, on June 18, 2025, OFAC issued GL 55D, which extends authorizations for certain activities related to the Sakhalin-2 project that would otherwise be prohibited by the Petroleum Services Determination. GL 55D expires on December 19, 2025.

The Petroleum Services Determination does not apply to (1) any petroleum services related to isotopes derived from petroleum manufacturing that are used for medical, agricultural, or environmental purposes, such as Carbon-13; (2) certain covered services related to the maritime transport of crude oil and petroleum products of Russian Federation origin purchased at or below the relevant price cap; and (3) any service in connection with the wind down or divestiture of an entity located in the Russian Federation that is not owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a Russian person. See FAQ 1217 for additional information related to price cap related exclusions of the Petroleum Services Determination.

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20251029 and https://ofac.treasury.gov/faqs/1216

 

*******

 

October 30, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned the Bhardwaj Human Smuggling Organization (Bhardwaj HSO), a transnational criminal organization (TCO) based in Cancun, Mexico, as well as its leader Vikrant Bhardwaj (Bhardwaj), three other individuals, and 16 companies that have facilitated and profited from the HSO’s criminal activities. The Bhardwaj HSO has smuggled thousands of illegal aliens from Europe, the Middle East, South America, and Asia into the United States. In addition to human smuggling, the Bhardwaj HSO is involved in drug trafficking, bribery, and money laundering.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Bhardwaj, Vikrant, of Mexico, United Arab Emirates and India;
  • Mendoza Villegas, Jorge Alejandro, of Mexico;
  • Rani, Indu, Benito Juarez, of Mexico and India; and
  • Valadez Flores, Jose German, of Mexico.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Bhardwaj Human Smuggling Organization, of Mexico;
  • Bhardwaj, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico;
  • Bhavishya Realcon Private Limited, of India;
  • Black Gold Plus Energies Trading L.L.C. of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Cargas Y Regulaciones Electricas, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico;
  • Comercialicun, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico;
  • Comercializadora Vespa, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico;
  • Constructora Gerlife, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico;
  • Michigantap Hospitality Private Limited of India;
  • Operadora Turistica Principessa, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico;
  • Thercumex, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico;
  • V And V Astillero, S.A. DE C.V. of Mexico;
  • Veena Shivani Estates Private Limited, of India;
  • VNV Fashions, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico;
  • VNV Store, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico;
  • VVN Buildcon Private Limited, of India; and
  • VVN Real Estate L.L.C., of the United Arab Emirates.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0296 and https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20251030

LATEST EXPORT CONTROLS AND COMPLIANCE UPDATE OCTOBER 2025 Read More »

Following the 50% Rule .. BIS Adds 29 Entries to the Entity List

On October 9, 2025 via 90 Fed. Reg. 48193 (“FRN”), the Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry Security (“BIS”) added 29 entries (26 entities and 3 addresses) located in China, Hong Kong, Turkey, and the U.A.E. to the Entity List . These entities were involved  in diverting U.S. origin commodities to Iran for use in Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)/ Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAVs) or aircraft in violation of the U.S. Export Administration Regulations (EAR).

 

Why This Matters

  • First Update to the Entity List since Implementation of the BIS Affiliate Rule (AKA 50% Beneficial Ownership Rule)

Under the new Affiliate Rule, implemented on September 29, 2025, companies are prohibited from engaging in a transaction without prior USG authorization with an unlisted entity that is 50% or more owned, in the aggregate, by an entity or entities identified on the BIS Entity List (EL) and the Military End User (MEU) list and the Dept. of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Asset Controls (OFAC) Specially Designated National List (SDN) List.

Companies must obtain the parent companies and owners of an entity up through to the ultimate beneficial owner and screen the entities against the EL, the MEU, and SDN for potential matches and ownership that is greater than then 50% threshold.

The requirement to screen for 50% ownership is not a new requirement – it is a requirement under the OFAC sanction programs – however under the BIS Affiliate Rule companies must review the licensing requirements or prohibitions for each owner identified on SDN, the EL, and MEU and apply the most restrictive requirement to the transaction.

 

  • Companies Must Adopt New Strategies and Tools to Comply with the Expanded Use of the 50% Beneficial Ownership Rule and Frequent Updates to the Lists

Performing 50% Beneficial Ownership screening and managing the rescreening of parties to a transaction (e.g. purchase, end user, freight forwarder, supplier, etc.) due to frequent updates to the lists will be challenging for companies with limited resources. Since September 29 when the Affiliate Rule was implemented, OFAC and BIS collectively added more than 150 entities over five different updates to the SDN and Entity list.

 

To manage these compliance requirements more efficiently, companies should use third-party sanctioned/restricted party ownership research services that dive deep into the Beneficial Ownership structure to augment existing sanctioned/restricted party screening tools. These tools should include persistent screening of the parties to the transaction against changes to the sanctioned/restricted party lists or a mechanism to regularly upload a list of parties for screening. Companies not using such services should supplement standard third-party services with internal sanction ownership research by utilizing publicly available information (e.g. investor reports, business documents filed with government, information from media outlets etc.) to fill potential gaps that exist between when an entity is added to a list to when the third-party service completes their research and updates their lists.

 

Lastly, company personnel conducting the screenings must be trained not only to use the screening tools but also to conduct sanctioned/restricted ownership research, identify and mitigate compliance risk or escalate to senior management when the risk cannot be mitigated.

 

On Our Radar

  • U.S . Origin Components Were Recovered from the UAS/UAV wreckage

The US Government stated in the FRN that it has identified the entities who diverted U.S. origin commodities to Iran from information found on the U.S. origin commodities recovered in the UAS/UAV  wreckage, presumably manufacturer’s name or logo, part number serial number, etc.

 

The FRN does not mention the manufacturer's role in the investigation, nonetheless, this underscores the importance of screening the parties to the transaction and particularly the end use/end user of the exported commodities. Moreover, companies should keep records of their due diligence efforts, such as end use statements or other documents,  if their products are later found in an unauthorized country or application, to assist the government in their investigation.

  • The Additions Included the China and Hong Kong Subsidiaries of Arrow Electronics, a U.S. Electronics  Distributor

BIS added the China and Hong Kong subsidiaries of Arrow Electronic to the BIS EL for facilitating the purchase of U.S. origin electronics  found in the wreckage of UAS operated by Iranian proxies. Arrow Electronics stated they are in discussions with BIS to resolve this issue. It will be interesting to see if the compliance actions taken by BIS are contained to the China and Hong Kong subsidiaries or if at a later date it spills over to the parent company.

Regardless of outcome, this action highlights the importance of ensuring that your foreign subsidiaries and affiliates compliance with U.S. export regulations are imperative and validating end use/end user and screening the parties to the transaction are mandatory not optional.

 

What’s Next?

  • Education - business functions, e.g. business development, purchasing, order entry/contract etc., that engage in transactions with foreign parties on the new requirements. Include foreign subsidiaries and affiliates in this process.
  • Discuss strategies for collecting and screening ultimate beneficial ownership information to ensure compliance.
  • Explore third-party screening solutions to augment and streamline your existing screening processes.

Following the 50% Rule .. BIS Adds 29 Entries to the Entity List Read More »

Out With The New, Back To The Old Ways BIS Rescinds Biden Era Firearms Restrictions On Exports

By John Herzo, J.D.

Senior Compliance Associate

On September 29, 2025 via 90 Fed. Reg. 47170, the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) rescinded in part Interim Final Rule, 89 Fed. Reg. 34680 (“Firearms IFR”), that imposed additional export requirements on the export of EAR regulated firearms, related ammunition and components thereof.

The Firearms IFR imposed a range of additional requirements, including:

  • A “presumption of denial” for exports to non-governmental user (civilian and commercial entities) to the following 36 “high-risk” countries: Bahamas, Bangladesh, Belize, Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Chad, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Indonesia, Jamaica, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Malaysia, Mali, Mozambique, Nepal, Niger, Nigeria, Pakistan, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, Tajikistan, Trinidad and Tobago, Uganda, Vietnam, and Yemen;
  • Export license requirements on sporting shotguns and optics to U.S. allies;
  • Limited the use of EAR License Exceptions BAG 15 CFR § 740.14 and LVS § 740.3;
  • Additional documentation requirements for license applications:

o  Purchase Order for all license applications for EAR regulated firearms, related ammunition and components;

o  Import Certificate or Equivalent Document for all license applications for EAR regulated firearms, related ammunition and components; and

o  Passport or National ID Card for all license applications for exports of EAR regulated firearms, related ammunition and components to individuals (Natural Persons);

  • Shorter validity period, one (1) Year as opposed to four (4) Years for other BIS 748P licenses for all BIS 748P licenses for the permanent export of EAR regulated firearms, related ammunition and components.

The current rule, 90 Fed. Reg. 47170, revokes a majority of the changes made to the EAR by the Firearms IFR, 89 Fed. Reg. 34680, and restores a majority of the export rules for EAR regulated firearms, related ammunition and components that previously existed. However, the current rule retains the four new ECCNs (0A506, 0A507, 0A508, and 0A509) implemented by Firearms IFR, 89 Fed. Reg. 34680, and does not remove the requirements to obtain BIS 748P licenses for most exports of EAR regulated firearms, related ammunition and components.

The current rule, 90 Fed. Reg. 47170, revokes the purchase order requirements for BIS 748P license applications for EAR regulated firearms, ammunition and components and the requirement for an Import Certificate or Equivalent Document. However, an Import Certificate or Equivalent Document is still a requirement for BIS 748P license applications for exports to countries that require these documents for entry of firearms, ammunition and components into their country. It should be noted that the Import Certificate or Equivalent Document in these instances was a requirement of the EAR prior to implementation of Firearms IFR, 89 Fed. Reg. 34680.

The current rule, 90 Fed. Reg. 47170, also revokes the requirement for a Passport or National ID Card to support a BIS 748P license application for export to individuals (Natural Persons).

Lastly, the current rule, 90 Fed. Reg. 47170, reinstates the four (4) year validity period for BIS 748P licenses for firearms, ammunition and components.

What does the current rule, 90 Fed. Reg. 47170, mean for U.S. exports of EAR regulated firearms, ammunition and components:

  • There is a wider range of countries to which EAR regulated firearms, ammunition and components can be exported to without the BIS 748P license application being reviewed with a presumption of denial;
  • There are less supporting documentation requirements to obtain a BIS 748P license EAR regulated firearms, ammunition and components;
  • EAR License Exceptions BAG § 740.14 and LVS § 740.3 may be available for the export of EAR regulated firearms, ammunition and components;
  • BIS 748P licenses for the export of EAR regulated firearms, ammunition and components will now be valid for four (4) Years.

What is not clear in the current rule, 90 Fed. Reg. 47170, is whether any BIS 748P licenses that were either revoked or modified by the Firearms IFR, 89 Fed. Reg. 34680, will be reinstated or reinstated without their modifications.

FD Associates suggests that any exporter that had their BIS 748P license revoked or modified contact Benjamin Barron, Supervisory Export Policy Analyst, Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of Commerce, Phone: 202-482-4252, or Ronald Rolfe, Supervisory Export Policy Analyst, Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of Commerce, Phone: 202-482-4563 or by Firearms@bis.doc.gov to determine if their revoked or modified license(s) will be reinstated.

Out With The New, Back To The Old Ways BIS Rescinds Biden Era Firearms Restrictions On Exports Read More »

LATEST EXPORT CONTROLS AND COMPLIANCE UPDATES SEPTEMBER 2025

This newsletter is a listing of the latest changes in export control regulations through September 30, 2025.  The newsletter is provided as a complimentary service to assist exporters with their ITAR and EAR export compliance responsibilities. It provides a summary of recent changes to export control regulations or other regulatory matters of interest that may impact your company’s international trade and export compliance functions. Call us at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net with questions or comments.

 

See also our “Latest Sanctions Fines & Penalties” section below for an update on companies and

persons denied export privileges by the United States Government.

 

REGULATORY UPDATES

President

Restoring the United States Department of War

September 5, 2025: Section 1.  Purpose.  On August 7, 1789, 236 years ago, President George Washington signed into law a bill establishing the United States Department of War to oversee the operation and maintenance of military and naval affairs.  It was under this name that the Department of War, along with the later formed Department of the Navy, won the War of 1812, World War I, and World War II, inspiring awe and confidence in our Nation’s military, and ensuring freedom and prosperity for all Americans.  The Founders chose this name to signal our strength and resolve to the world.  The name “Department of War,” more than the current “Department of Defense,” ensures peace through strength, as it demonstrates our ability and willingness to fight and win wars on behalf of our Nation at a moment’s notice, not just to defend.  This name sharpens the Department’s focus on our own national interest and our adversaries’ focus on our willingness and availability to wage war to secure what ours is. President Trump has therefore determined that this Department should once again be known as the Department of War and the Secretary should be known as the Secretary of War.

 

Sec2.  Implementation.  (a)  The Secretary of Defense is authorized the use of this additional secondary title — the Secretary of War — and may be recognized by that title in official correspondence, public communications, ceremonial contexts, and non-statutory documents within the executive branch.

(b)  The Department of Defense and the Office of the Secretary of Defense may be referred to as the Department of War and the Office of the Secretary of War, respectively, in the contexts described in subsection (a) of this section.

(c)  The provisions of this section shall also apply, as appropriate, to subordinate officials within the Department of Defense, who may use corresponding secondary titles such as Deputy Secretary of War or Under Secretary of War in the contexts described in subsection (a) of this section.

(d) All executive departments and agencies shall recognize and accommodate the use of such secondary titles in internal and external communications, provided that the use of such titles does not create confusion with respect to legal, statutory, or international obligations.

(e) Statutory references to the Department of Defense, Secretary of Defense, and subordinate officers and components shall remain controlling until changed subsequently by the law.

(f)  Within 30 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of War shall submit to the President, through the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, a notification for transmittal to the Congress of any office, executive department or agency, component, or command that begins using a secondary Department of War designation.

 

(g)  Within 60 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of War shall submit to the President, through the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, a recommendation on the actions required to permanently change the name of the Department of Defense to the Department of War.  This recommendation shall include the proposed legislative and executive actions necessary to accomplish this renaming.

 

Sec3.  General Provisions.  (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

(d)  The costs for publication of this order shall be borne by the Department of War.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/09/restoring-the-united-states-department-of-war/

*******

Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC)

Continuation of Cyprus Defense Trade Policy in the International Traffic in Arms Regulations for Fiscal Year 2026

September 9, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 43388: Secretary Rubio determined and certified to Congress that the Republic of Cyprus has met the necessary conditions under the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 (P.L. 116-92) and the Eastern Mediterranean Security and Energy Partnership Act of 2019 (P.L. 116-94, Div. J.) to allow the Department to approve licenses and other approvals for exports, reexports, and transfers of defense articles and defense services to the Republic of Cyprus for FY 2026.

Secretary Rubio’s actions continue the Department’s existing policy, which first suspended the status of the Republic of Cyprus as a proscribed destination under § 126.1 of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) on October 1, 2022.

Therefore, the Department of State published a Federal Register notice amending the ITAR § 126.1(r) to specify that the policy of denial as described in § 126.1(r) shall not apply with respect to exports, reexports, and transfers to the Republic of Cyprus for FY 2026 and that the Republic of Cyprus’ status as a proscribed destination is suspended for FY 2026 with respect to exports, reexports, and transfers of defense articles and defense services.  The Federal Register notice will also amend the ITAR to suspend the policy of denial for retransfers and temporary imports destined for or originating in the Republic of Cyprus and brokering activities involving the Republic of Cyprus for FY 2026.

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_public_portal_news_and_events

*******

ITAR: U.S. Munitions List Targeted Revisions - Updated ITAR Reorg Redline As Of Effective Date

September 16, 2025: On September 15, 2025, the Department of State final rule entitled “U.S. Munitions List Targeted Revisions” (90 FR 41778, Aug. 27, 2025) became effective, amending ITAR sections 121.0, 121.1, and 126.9.  To assist users of the ITAR, the Department provided the following link to the updated ITAR Reorg redline, including all amendments made by that rulemaking. Those changes are identified in the reorg redline by identifier “Rev.16”.

DDTC provided the redlines as a service to the public, but notes that it is not intended to be a substitute for any official publication of the U.S. Government.  We direct your attention to the annual edition of the Code of Federal Regulations and to the e-CFR system for the actual regulatory text.

  • 87 FR 16396 – ITAR Reorg I – ITAR Redline

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/sys_attachment.do?sys_id=100861694780b65027972464336d4326

Refer to our article - What The Latest ITAR Revisions Mean For Small Businesses for more details.

*******

New USML Update And License Submission Errors

September 17, 2025: The latest version of the U.S. Munitions List (USML) went into effect on September 15, 2025, introducing updated USML Categories and Subcategories. Following these changes, some DECCS users have reported encountering error messages when submitting licenses. These errors are likely due to a mismatch between the USML values in licenses drafted before September 15, 2025, prior to the updated USML taking effect.

What This Means for You

If you have received the error message “USML Category & Sub Category contained outdated version information. Update the USML Category and Sub Category to select from the latest USML version.” upon submission of a license in DECCS, please follow the steps below. Licenses created prior to the USML update need to be adjusted to match the new requirements. Please note, these steps apply to all licenses returning this error message, regardless of the USML categories included in the submission.

Steps to Resolve the Issue: 
  • Log out and log back into DECCS to refresh your session
  • Create a copy of the license that is returning the error
  • Carefully review the selected USML categories to ensure they align with the updated version, along with the rest of the form and any attached files
  • Resubmit the license

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_public_portal_news_and_events

*******

DDTC Name And Address Changes Posted To Website

September 5, 2025 through September 5, 2025: The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) posted the following name and/or address changes on its website at    

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_kb_article_page&sys_id=bd72ca0adbf8d30044f9ff621f961981:

  • Name change of Goodrich Aerospace Canada Ltd. to Goodrich Aerospace Canada Corp. due to corporate restructuring;
  • Name and Address Change of Salland Engineering (Europe) B.V., Schrevenweg 12, 8024 HA Zwolle, Netherlands to Salland Engineering B.V., Boerendanserdijk 39, 8024 AE Zwolle, Netherlands due to corporate restructuring;
  • Name and Address Change of Honeywell Japan Ltd., 7-1, Kaigan 1-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan to Japan Honeywell GK, 16-1 Kaigan 1-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan due to corporate restructuring.

*******

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA)

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Finland

September 10, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Finland has requested to buy up to four hundred five (405) AIM-120D-3 Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM); and eight (8) AIM-120D-3 guidance sections, with precise positioning provided by either the Selective Availability Anti-Spoofing Module or M-Code. The following non-MDE items will be included: AMRAAM control sections, containers, and support equipment; Common Munitions Built-in Test (BIT)/Reprogramming Equipment (CMBRE); ADU-891 adaptor group test sets; munitions support and support equipment; spare parts, consumables and accessories, and repair and return support; weapons software and support equipment; classified software delivery and support; classified publications and technical documentation; personnel training and training equipment; transportation support; site surveys; U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics support services; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $1.07 billion. The principal contractor will be RTX Corporation, located in Arlington, VA. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale.

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4299369/finland-aim-120d-3-advanced-medium-range-air-to-air-missiles

*******

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Peru

September 15, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Peru has requested to buy ten (10) F-16C Block 70 aircraft; two (2) F-16D Block 70 aircraft; fourteen (14) F110-GE-129 engines (12 installed, 2 spares); fourteen (14) Improved Programmable Display Generators (12 installed, 2 spares); twelve (12) AIM-120C-8 Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM); fifty-two (52) LAU-129 guided missile launchers (48 installed, 4 spares); twelve (12) M61A1 anti-aircraft guns; fourteen (14) Embedded Global Positioning System Inertial Navigation Systems (12 installed, 2 spares); fourteen (14) AN/APG-83 active electronically scanned array Scalable Agile Beam Radars (12 installed, 2 spares); fourteen (14) Modular Mission Computers 7000AH (or next generation mission computer equivalent) (12 installed, 2 spares); twelve (12) AIM-9X Block II Sidewinder missiles; two (2) AIM-9X Block II Sidewinder tactical guidance units; one (1) AIM-9X Block II Sidewinder Captive Air Training Missile (CATM) guidance unit; two (2) AIM-9X Block II Sidewinder CATMs; and fourteen (14) Multifunctional Information Distribution System-Joint Tactical Radio Systems (12 installed, 2 spares). The following non-MDE items will also be included: Infrared Search and Track systems; missile warning systems; AN/ALQ-254 Viper Shield or equivalent electronic warfare systems; AN/AAQ-28 Litening targeting pods; Cartridge Actuated Devices/Propellant Actuated Devices (CAD/PAD); AIM-120C-8 AMRAAM CATMs; Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing Systems II (JHMCS II) helmet-mounted displays; ammunition; cartridges, chaffs, and flares; weapons support equipment; embedded communications security devices; AN/ALE-47 airborne countermeasures dispenser systems; countermeasure processors, sequencer switching units, and Control Display Units; AN/APX-127 advanced identification friend or foe or equivalent; AN/ARC-238 radios; KIV-78A and KY-58M cryptographic devices; AN/PYQ-10 Simple Key Loaders; night vision devices (NVD) and NVD intensifier tubes; ADU-890 and ADU-891 adaptor group computer test sets; Joint Mission Planning System; pylons, launcher adapters, weapon interfaces, and bomb and ejection racks; fuel tanks; Precision Measurement Equipment Laboratory (PMEL) and calibration support; Common Munitions Built-in-Test Reprogramming Equipment; targeting systems; spare and repair parts, consumables, and accessories; repair and return support; aircraft, engine, ground, and pilot life support equipment; classified and unclassified computer program identification number systems; classified and unclassified software and software support; classified and unclassified publications, manuals, and technical documentation; National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) maps and mapping data; personnel training and training equipment, simulators, and training devices; studies and surveys; facilities and construction support transportation, ferry, and fuel support; U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics support services; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $3.42 billion.

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4304541/peru-f-16-aircraft

*******

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Norway

September 15, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Norway has requested to buy eight hundred sixteen (816) GBU-39/B Small Diameter Bombs Increment I. The following non-MDE items will also be included: spare parts, consumables and accessories, and repair and return support; training aids, devices, and spare parts; classified and unclassified software delivery and support; classified and unclassified publications and technical data; U.S. Government and contractor engineering, logistics, and technical support services; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $113 million. The principal contractor will be The Boeing Company, located in Arlington, VA. The purchaser typically requests offsets. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4304040/norway-gbu-39b-small-diameter-bomb-increment-i

*******

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Belgium

September 15, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Belgium  has requested to buy up to the following quantities: three hundred twenty (320) AIM-9X Block II Sidewinder tactical missiles; two hundred fifty-eight (258) AIM-9X Block II+ Sidewinder tactical missiles; fifty (50) AIM-9X Block II tactical guidance units; and thirty (30) AIM-9X Block II+ tactical guidance units. The following non-Major Defense Equipment items will also be included: missile containers; weapon software; transportation; U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistical support services; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $567.8 million. The principal contractor will be RTX Corporation, located in Arlington, VA. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4304022/belgium-aim-9x-sidewinder-missiles

*******

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To the Netherlands

September 16, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of the Netherlands has requested to buy up to two hundred thirty-two (232) AIM-120C-8 Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM) and up to eight (8) AIM-120C-8 AMRAAM guidance sections. The following non-Major Defense Equipment items will be included: AMRAAM control section spares, Captive Air Training Missiles, and missile containers; spare parts, consumables and accessories, and repair and return support; weapon system support and software; classified software delivery and support; classified and unclassified publications and technical documentation; personnel training and training equipment; transportation support; U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics support services; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $570 million. The principal contractor will be RTX Corporation, located in Arlington, VA. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4305375/the-netherlands-aim-120c-8-advanced-medium-range-air-to-air-missiles

*******

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Norway

September 17, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Norway has requested to buy up to fifty (50) MK 54 MOD 0 lightweight torpedo all up rounds. The following non-MDE items will also be included: torpedo components; containers; software; training; support equipment; spare and repair parts; publications and technical documentation; transportation; U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistical support services; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $162.1 million. The principal contractor will be RTX Corporation, located in Arlington, VA. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4306771/norway-mk-54-mod-0-lightweight-torpedoes

*******

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Poland

September 18, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Poland has requested to buy two thousand five hundred six (2,506) FGM-148F Javelin missiles and two hundred fifty-three (253) Javelin Lightweight Command Launch Units. The following non-MDE items will be included: missile simulation rounds; battery coolant units; tool kits; spares support; training; U.S. Government and contractor technical assistance; transportation; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $780 million. The principal contractors will be RTX Corporation, located in Arlington, VA; and Lockheed Martin, located in Tucson, AZ. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4307858/poland-javelin-missile-systems

*******

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Germany

September 25, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Germany has requested to buy up to four hundred (400) AIM-120D-3 Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM); up to twelve (12) AIM-120D-3 AMRAAM guidance sections, including precise positioning provided by either Selective Availability Anti-Spoofing Module or M-Code; and one (1) AIM-120 AMRAAM Integrated Test Vehicle. The following non-Major Defense Equipment items will also be included: AMRAAM telemetry kits, control sections, containers, and support equipment; ADU-891 Adaptor Group Test sets; KGV-135A encryption devices; spare parts, consumables and accessories, and repair and return support; weapons system support and software; classified and unclassified software delivery and support; classified and unclassified publications and technical documentation; personnel training and training equipment; U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics support services; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $1.23 billion. The principal contractor will be RTX Corporation, located in Arlington, VA. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined by in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4314880/germany-aim-120d-3-advanced-medium-range-air-to-air-missiles

*******

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Australia

September 30, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of has requested to buy forty-eight (48) M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS). The following non-MDE items will also be included: M1084A2 HIMARS resupply vehicles; M1095 trailers; Low Cost Reduced Range Practice Rocket (LCRRPR) pods; intercom systems; radio and communication mounts; spare parts and services; U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics support services; studies and surveys; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $705 million. The principal contractors will be Lockheed Martin, located in Grand Prairie, TX; L3Harris Corporation, located in Melbourne, FL; Leonardo DRS, located in Arlington, VA; and Oshkosh Corporation, located in Stafford, VA. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4318640/australia-m142-high-mobility-artillery-rocket-systems

*******

Department of Commerce – Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

Revocation of Validated End-User Authorizations in the People's Republic of China

September 2, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 42321: In this final rule, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) amends the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to revise the existing Validated End-User (VEU) Authorizations list for the People's Republic of China (PRC) by removing Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Ltd; Samsung China Semiconductor Co. Ltd; and SK hynix Semiconductor (China) Ltd.

Validated End-Users (VEUs) are designated entities located in eligible destinations to which eligible items subject to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) may be exported, reexported, or transferred (in-country) under a general EAR authorization instead of a license (see 15 CFR 748.15 (Authorization Validated End-User (VEU)). The names of the VEUs, as well as the dates they were designated, and the associated eligible destinations (i.e., facilities) and items are identified in supplement no. 7 to part 748 of the EAR. Pursuant to § 748.15, VEU-eligible destinations may obtain eligible items without the need for the VEU's supplier to obtain an export, reexport, or transfer (in-country) license from the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS). VEU-eligible items vary among VEUs and may include commodities, software, and/or technology, apart from items controlled for missile technology or crime control reasons on the Commerce Control List (CCL) (supplement no. 1 to part 774 of the EAR).

VEUs are reviewed and approved by the U.S. Government in accordance with the provisions of § 748.15 and supplement nos. 8 and 9 to part 748 of the EAR. The End-User Review Committee (ERC) is responsible for administering the VEU program. The ERC is composed of representatives from the Departments of State, Defense, Energy, Commerce, and other agencies, as appropriate. BIS amended the EAR in a final rule published on June 19, 2007 (72 FR 33646) to create Authorization VEU.

Pursuant to § 748.15 and supplement no. 9 to part 748 of the EAR, the ERC determined to remove Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Ltd, Samsung China Semiconductor Co. Ltd, and SK hynix Semiconductor (China) Ltd from the Validated End User Program.

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/09/02/2025-16735/revocation-of-validated-end-user-authorizations-in-the-peoples-republic-of-china

*******

Relaxing Export Controls for Syria

September 2, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg 42315: In this final rule, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) made changes to the Syria export control measures under the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), consistent with Executive Order (E.O.) 14312, Providing for the Revocation of Syria Sanctions, which directed the removal of sanctions on Syria. This final rule relaxes the EAR's existing restrictions on exports and reexports to Syria of items subject to the EAR by making the following changes: revising certain restrictive license application review policies that had applied to most items subject to the EAR to be more favorable; expanding existing license exceptions to apply to Syria; and adding new license exceptions for Syria, including for EAR99 items.

In this final rule, BIS makes changes to the export control measures for Syria under the EAR. The three sets of changes being made are described in section II as follows:

  1. Addition of new or expanded license exception eligibility for exports and reexports to Syria;
  2. Adoption of more permissive license review policies for exports and reexports to Syria; and
  3. Other conforming and streamlining updates, including removal of provisions that are obsolete, e.g., General Order No. 2.

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/09/02/2025-16724/relaxing-export-controls-for-syria

*******

Statement of Licensing Policy for Export, Reexport, and Transfer (In-Country) Applications Related to Belavia – Belarusian Airlines

September 12, 2025: This Statement of Licensing Policy (SLP) is issued in conjunction with a new letter authorization pertaining to Belavia-Belarusian Airlines (Belavia).

On September 12, 2025, BIS issued a letter authorizing, among other activities, flights of certain Belavia aircraft between Belarus and most other destinations.  This letter also authorizes the service, maintenance, repair, overhaul, or refurbishing of such aircraft.

Consistent with this letter, BIS has removed eight Belavia aircraft from its General Prohibition 10 (GP10) list, whose continued listing would otherwise prevent the maintenance, repair, overhaul, or refurbishing of such aircraft.

For exports, reexports, or transfers (in-country) of equipment, supplies, and materials that remain subject to an export license to or for use in connection with Belavia aircraft, license applications now will generally be reviewed on a case-by-case basis to determine whether the items are for the maintenance and use of Belavia’s commercial passenger fleet, and to guard against the risk of diversion to other unsupported end-uses or end-users.

https://media.bis.gov/press-release/statement-licensing-policy-export-reexport-transfer-country-applications-related-belavia-belarusian

*******

Department of Commerce Rescinds Firearms Rule, Restoring Common Sense to Export Controls on Civilian Firearms

September 29, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 47170: The Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) rescinded an interim final rule (Firearms IFR), which imposed onerous export controls on civilian firearms and related ammunition and components. The rescission of the Firearms IFR will allow U.S. firearms manufacturers to compete in overseas markets, creating hundreds of millions of dollars per year in export opportunities.

The now-defunct Firearms IFR imposed a range of excessive and burdensome requirements, including:

  • A “presumption of denial” for civilian firearms exports to 36 supposedly “high-risk” countries – effectively ceding overseas markets to foreign firearms manufacturers, with no benefit to national security.
    •    Export license requirements on sporting shotguns and optics to U.S. allies – despite no evidence of any national security risk.
    •    Bureaucratic hurdles on firearms export licenses, such as extensive documentation requirements and short validity periods.

This rule revokes these requirements and restores the export rules for civilian firearms that existed prior to the IFR.  Under these rules, exports of most pistols, rifles, and non-long-barrel shotguns will remain subject to a worldwide export license requirement. Long-barrel shotguns and most optics can be exported without a license to U.S. allies and certain partners. License application paperwork requirements for firearms will be streamlined and consistent with normal BIS practice. BIS and interagency partners will continue to screen firearms license applications to reduce the risk of weapons ending up in the hands of wrongdoers.

https://media.bis.gov/press-release/department-commerce-rescinds-biden-era-firearms-rule-restoring-common-sense-export-controls-civilian

*******

U.S. Census Bureau

NEW BIS LICENSE TYPE C78 – (SPP) Syria Peace and Prosperity

September 2, 2025:

On Tuesday, September 2, 2025 the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published a final rule (https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/09/02/2025-16724/relaxing-export-controls-for-syria) with an effective date of September 2, 2025 for most provisions.  In this final rule, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) made changes to the Syria export control measures under the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), consistent with Executive Order (E.O.) 14312. This final rule expanded the eligibility of EAR license exceptions for Syria by adding a new license exception for Syria called License Exception Syria Peace and Prosperity (SPP), amending the scope of existing License Exception Consumer Communications Devices (CCD) to add Syria to the country scope, and making additional paragraphs of existing license exceptions available for exports and reexports to Syria.

In § 740.5, currently reserved, this final rule amends the section to add License Exception SPP. New License Exception SPP will authorize exports and reexports to Syria of all items designated EAR99 subject to the terms and conditions therein and the general restrictions set forth under § 740.2 of the EAR. In § 740.5(a) (Scope) of License Exception SPP, this final rule specifies that this license exception will overcome license requirements for the export or reexport of all items designated “EAR99.” Items designated “EAR99” are items subject to the EAR but not specifically described on the Commerce Control List (CCL) in an ECCN.

In § 740.5(b) (Restrictions), this final rule adds this paragraph to specify that License Exception SPP does not authorize exports or reexports prohibited under a part 744 end-use or end-user control, including under  § 744.8 for transactions involving persons designated by Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) to the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List with certain identifiers.

This final rule as a conforming change adds a reference to License Exception SPP in § 746.9(b)(1) to specify that it is an available license exception for Syria, provided that the export or reexport is not otherwise restricted under § 740.2 and meets all the terms and conditions of License Exception SPP.

New License Code C78 Syria Peace and Prosperity (SPP)

An update has been made to AES to create new License Codes C78 “Syria Peace and Prosperity” (SPP) which authorizes certain export, reexport, and transfer (in-country) of items specified in ECCN EAR99. SPP will authorize exports and reexports to Syria of all items designated EAR99 subject to the terms and conditions therein and the general restrictions set forth under § 740.2 of the EAR. In § 740.5(a) (Scope) of License Exception SPP, this final rule specifies that this license exception will overcome license requirements for the export or reexport of all items designated “EAR99.” Items designated “EAR99” are items subject to the EAR but not specifically described on the CCL in an ECCN.

The full terms of License Exception SPP are described in § 740.5.

AES filers must adhere to the following new reporting when using C78 (SPP) to prevent the return of fatal errors from AES:

  • Report License Code: C78 Syria Peace and Prosperity
  • Allowable ECCNs: EAR99
  • Allowable countries: Syria
  • Allowable Export Information Codes: All except UG, FS, FI
  • Allowable Modes of Transportation: All except ‘70’ (Fixed Transport)

*******

UPDATED BIS LICENSE TYPE C58 – (CCD) Consumer Communication Devices

September 2, 2025:

On Tuesday, September 2, 2025 the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published a final rule (https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/09/02/2025-16724/relaxing-export-controls-for-syria) with an effective date of September 2, 2025 for most provisions. Among other actions, this final rule expands the eligibility of EAR license exceptions for Syria by amending the scope of existing License Exception Consumer Communications Devices (CCD) to add Syria to the country scope.

In § 740.19 Consumer Communications Devices (CCD), this final rule revises this section to add Syria as an eligible destination under the terms of § 740.19(a). In §740.19(b) (Eligible commodities and software), this final rule revises this paragraph to indicate that all commodities and software described in § 740.19(b) are eligible for export or reexport to Syria pursuant to the terms of § 740.19.

In § 740.19(c)(1) (Organizations), which establishes eligible and ineligible organizations for transactions pursuant to the terms of CCD, this final rule modifies this paragraph to indicate that CCD does not restrict eligibility to any end user in Syria.  However, CCD cannot authorize transactions that require a license under part 744 of the EAR or with persons that are sanctioned under programs administered by another agency, including the Departments of State and the Treasury. For example, License Exception CCD may not be used to export consumer communications devices to members of the former regime of Bashar al-Assad, as identified by the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Treasury.

This final rule as a conforming change adds a reference to License Exception CCD in § 746.9(b)(8) to specify that it is an available license exception for Syria, provided that the transaction is not otherwise restricted under § 740.2 and meets all the applicable terms and conditions of License Exception CCD.

Updated License Code C58 (CCD)

An update has been made to AES to License Type Code C58 “Consumer Communication Devices” (CCD), which allows the export and re-export of consumer products related to the free flow of information to, from and among the Cuban, Russian, and the Belarusian, and Syrian people, enabling communications among people within those countries and with the outside world. The rule revises the License Code to indicate that all commodities and software described in § 740.19(b) are eligible for export or reexport to Syria pursuant to the terms of § 740.19. See 740.19 of the EAR. EAR99 may be reported as an ECCN.

*******

UPDATED BIS LICENSE TYPE C46 – (AVS) Aircraft and Vessels

September 2, 2025:

On Tuesday, September 2, 2025, the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published a final rule (https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/09/02/2025-16724/relaxing-export-controls-for-syria) with an effective date of September 2, 2025, for most provisions. Among other actions, this final rule expands the eligibility of EAR license exceptions for Syria by making additional paragraphs of existing license exceptions available for exports and reexports to Syria.

In § 740.15 (License Exception AVS, for Aircraft, vessels and spacecraft) under paragraph (b)(4), this final rule revises this paragraph to ensure that only items designated as EAR99 or controlled on the CCL only for anti-terrorism reasons are eligible to be sent to Syria under paragraph (b) of License Exception AVS. This revised text is intended to ensure that no equipment and spare parts for a vessel or aircraft that could make a significant contribution to the military potential of Syria, including its military logistics capability, or could enhance Syria’s ability to support acts of international terrorism, is authorized to Syria without the required notification to Congress, consistent with 50 USC 4813(c)(2).

This final rule also adds a Note to paragraph (b)(4) to specify that for purposes of paragraph (b)(4), ECCNs 2B999, 3A991, 4A994, 5A992 (except for .z), and 9A991 are treated as ECCNs controlled exclusively for AT reasons.

This final rule as a conforming change adds a reference to License Exception AVS in § 746.9(b)(4) to specify that it is an available license exception for Syria, provided that the transaction is not otherwise restricted under § 740.2 and meets all the applicable terms and conditions of License Exception AVS.

Updated License Code C46 (AVS)

An update has been made to AES to License Type Code C46 “Aircraft and Vessels” (AVS), which allows departure from the United States of foreign registry civil aircraft on temporary sojourn in the United States and of U.S. civil aircraft for temporary sojourn abroad; the export of equipment and spare parts for permanent use on a vessel or aircraft; exports to vessels or planes of U.S., Australian, Canadian, or UK (the United Kingdom) registry and U.S., Australian, Canadian, or UK Airlines' installations or agents; the export or reexport of cargo that will transit Cuba on an aircraft or vessel on temporary sojourn; and the export of spacecraft and components for fundamental research.

This rule broadens the eligibility for Syria by expanding License Exception AVS eligibility to exports of U.S.-registered civil aircraft and vessels and temporary reexports of U.S. and foreign registered civil aircraft and vessels to Syria on temporary sojourn pursuant to the terms of § 740.15(a) - (d) of the EAR. This License Exception is available subject to the restriction that the transaction will not support the Syrian police, military, or intelligence end users pursuant to supplement no. 2 to part 742.

*******

How to Resolve Common AES Response Messages

September 16, 2025:

When submitting your Electronic Export Information (EEI) to the Automated Export System (AES), you can receive different response messages: Fatal, Compliance, Verify, Informational and Warning.  It is important that AES filers address and/or correct Response Messages as soon as they are received to comply with the Foreign Trade Regulations.

To help you take the appropriate action, here is guidance on how to address one of the most frequent Response Messages that were generated in the AES for the previous month.

Response Code:  120

Narrative:     Carrier Unknown

Severity:       Fatal

Reason:        The Carrier ID (SCAC/IATA) reported is not known in AES.

Resolution:  For vessel, rail or truck shipments the carrier must be identified with an active SCAC code issued by the National Motor Freight Traffic Association (NMFTA).  For air shipments, the carrier must be identified with an active IATA code issued by the International Air Transport Association.

If the Carrier ID (SCAC/IATA) as known at the time of filing is not valid in AES and a valid Carrier ID (SCAC/IATA) cannot be obtained from the carrier, as a last resort, report the Carrier ID as UNKN for vessel, rail or truck shipments.  For an unknown air carrier, report one of the acceptable “unknown” codes as follows:

*F or 99F for Unknown Foreign Air Carrier

*U or 99U for Unknown U.S. Air Carrier

*C or 99C for Unknown Canadian Air Carrier

** or 99O for flyway aircraft reported under Chapter 88.

Verify the Mode of Transportation Code and the Carrier ID (SCAC/IATA), correct the shipment and resubmit

LATEST SANCTIONS FINES & PENALTIES

This section of our newsletter provides information on the latest sanctions, fines and penalties for export violations or matters of non-compliance with the ITAR or EAR issued by the US government enforcement agencies. It is provided as a service to exporters and associates of FD Associates to remind them of the importance of extreme due diligence in all international trade and export compliance matters, particularly those involving exports subject to the ITAR or the EAR. Don't let this happen to you or your company! Call us with questions or concerns at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net.

Fines and Penalties

 

Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

September 9, 2025: Gregory Muñoz (47, Minneola) was sentenced to 18 months in federal prison for conspiracy to commit wire fraud. As part of his sentence, the court also entered an order of forfeiture in the amount of $100,000, the proceeds of the wire fraud. Muñoz pleaded guilty on May 9, 2024.

Muñoz’s co-conspirator, Pen Yu, pleaded guilty in May 2024 and was sentenced to three years and seven months in prison, later reduced to two years and six months in prison. Another co-conspirator, Jonathan Thyng, pleaded guilty in July 2024 and was sentenced to probation.

According to court documents, beginning in at least July 2016 and continuing through at least May 2023, Yu ordered biochemical products from MilliporeSigma, a subsidiary of multinational science and technology company Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, with help from Muñoz, a MilliporeSigma salesperson, by falsely representing that Yu was affiliated with a biology research lab at a Florida university. This fictitious affiliation led MilliporeSigma to provide Yu millions of dollars’ worth of discounts and other benefits, such as free overnight shipping, not available to the public. Yu gave Muñoz thousands of dollars in gift cards for facilitating these fraudulent discounted orders. When the products arrived at the university stockroom, a stockroom employee diverted the products to Yu, who repackaged them and shipped them to China. To avoid scrutiny, Yu made false statements about the value and contents of these shipments in export documents.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-mdfl/pr/company-insider-sentenced-18-months-prison-fraudulently-obtaining-laboratory-research

*******

Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

September 3, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)  announced that Fracht FWO Inc. (Fracht), a freight forwarder whose principal place of business is in Houston, Texas, has agreed to pay $1,610,775 to settle its potential civil liability for apparent violations of multiple OFAC sanctions programs, including those on Venezuela and Iran. Fracht contracted with a blocked Government of Venezuela airline to transport goods to Argentina from Mexico on behalf of its customer. The blocked Venezuelan airline used an aircraft blocked by OFAC for being operated by Iran's Mahan Air, which is sanctioned under U.S. terrorism and proliferation authorities. OFAC found Fracht's conduct was egregious and not voluntarily self-disclosed.

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934601/download?inline and

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934596/download?inline

*******

September 22, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)  announced that ShapeShift AG, a digital asset exchange incorporated in Switzerland and operating from Denver, Colorado, agreed to pay $750,000 to settle its potential civil liability for apparent violations of multiple sanctions programs. Specifically, ShapeShift engaged in digital asset transactions on its exchange platform with users located in Cuba, Iran, Sudan, and Syria on 17,183 occasions. The settlement amount reflects OFAC's determination that ShapeShift AG's conduct was non-egregious and not voluntarily self-disclosed.

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934641/download?inline

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250922_33

 

Sanctions

 

Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

Additions and Revisions to the Entity List

September 16, 2025: 90 Fed. Reg. 44496: In this rule, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) amends the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by adding 32 entities to the Entity List. These entries are listed on the Entity List under the destination of China, People's Republic of (China) (23), India, (1), Iran (1), Singapore (1), Taiwan (1), Turkey (3), and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) (2). These entities have been determined by the U.S. Government to be acting contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States. This final rule revises an entry by removing two addresses from one entity under the destination of Russia. Finally, this rule amends 27 existing entries on the Entity List to correct typographical errors under the following destinations: Belarus (3), China (11), Iran (1), Pakistan (1), Russia (9), and Turkey (2), and the United Arab Emirates UAE (2).

The entities to be added:

China

  • Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
  • Beijing Fudan Microelectronics Technology Co., Ltd.,
  • Beijing Tianyi Huiyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd.,
  • Beijing Tsingke Biotech Co., Ltd.,
  • Changsha NetForward Electronic Technology Co. Ltd.,
  • Changzhou Netforward Microelectronics Co., Ltd.,
  • Chengdu NetForward Microelectronics Co., Ltd.,
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Time Service Center,
  • GMC Semiconductor Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd.,
  • Hong Kong DEMX Co., Ltd.,
  • Hua Ke Logistics (HK) Limited,
  • Hua Ke Supply Chain (HK) Limited,
  • Jicun Semiconductor Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.,
  • Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.,
  • Shanghai Fudan Microelectronics Co., Ltd.,
  • Shanghai Fudan Microelectronics (HK) Co., Ltd.,
  • Shanghai Fukong Hualong Microsystem Technology Co., Ltd.,
  • Shanghai Fuwei Xunjie Digital Technology Co., Ltd.,
  • Shanghai Suochen Information Technology Co., Ltd.,
  • Shenzhen Fudan Microelectronics Co., Ltd.,
  • Shenzhen NetForward Microelectronics Co., Ltd.,
  • Shenzhen Xinlikang Supply Chain Management Co., Limited, and
  • Sino IC Technology Co., Ltd.

India

  • AR Sales Pvt Ltd.

Iran

  • Smart Mail Services.

Singapore

  • Shanghai Fudan Microelectronics (HK) Co., Ltd.

Taiwan

  • Shanghai Fudan Microelectronics (HK) Co., Ltd.

Turkey

  • Atempo Proje Taahhüt Ses ve Görüntü Sistemleri Anonim Şirketi İstanbul Şubesi,
  • Dentun Elektronik, and
  • EB Teknoloji Sistemleri Anonim Şirketi.

United Arab Emirates

  • HAS General Trading LLC, and
  • Smart Mail Services.

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/09/16/2025-17893/additions-and-revisions-to-the-entity-list

*******

Department of Commerce Expands Entity List to Cover Affiliates of Listed Entities

September 29, 2025: 90 Fed. Reg. 47201: The Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued a new rule that closes a significant loophole in restricted party lists – strengthening the export control regime overall.

Under this rule, any entity that is at least 50 percent owned by one or more entities on the Entity List or the Military End-User (MEU) List will itself automatically be subject to Entity List/MEU List restrictions.  In addition, significant minority ownership by an Entity List/MEU List company is a red flag that triggers additional due diligence requirements for exporters.  Previously, the Entity List and MEU List completely excluded all entities that were not specifically named on the Entity List/MEU List – even if there were extensive corporate and financial ties with listed entities.

BIS’ Entity List and MEU List impose stringent supplemental export license requirements on parties involved in activities contrary to U.S. national security or foreign policy interests, or whether there is an unacceptable risk of use in or diversion to a military end use.  While the license review policy for parties on the Entity List or MEU List is generally a presumption of denial, exporters can always apply for a license.

The public is invited to comment on this rule within 30 days of publication in the Federal Register. The restrictions in the rule will be immediately effective, with some exceptions available up to 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.

https://media.bis.gov/press-release/department-commerce-expands-entity-list-cover-affiliates-listed-entities

See our article - From FOCI to the 50% Rule – BIS/EAR New Ownership Test  for more details

*******

Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

September 2, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned a network of shipping companies and vessels led by Iraqi-Kittitian businessman Waleed al-Samarra’i (al-Samarra’i) for smuggling Iranian oil disguised as Iraqi oil.  This network operates primarily by covertly blending Iranian oil with Iraqi oil, which is then marketed intentionally as solely of Iraqi origin to avoid sanctions. This scheme has generated hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue for both the Iranian regime and al-Samarra’i himself.

The following individual has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Al-Samarra’I, Waleed Khaled Hameed of the United Arab Emirates.

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Babylon Navigation DMCC of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Galaxy Oil FZ LLC of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Keely Shiptrade Limited of the Marshall Islands;
  • Oidar Management S.A. of the Marshall Islands;
  • Panarea Marine S.A. of the Marshall Islands;
  • Topsail Shipholding Inc. of the Marshal Islands; and
  • Tryfo Navigation Inc. of the Marshall Islands.

The following vessels have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Adena (D5ZY7) Crude Oil Tanker Liberia flag; MMSI 636020606 (vessel);
  • Alexandra (5LLV6) Crude Oil Tanker Liberia flag; MMSI 636023078 (vessel);
  • Bellagio (9V6969) Chemical/Products Tanker Liberia flag; MMSI 636024318 (vessel);
  • Bianca (5LOX8) Chemical/Products Tanker Liberia flag; MMSI 636023688 (vessel);
  • Camilla (5LAB7) Crude Oil Tanker Liberia flag; MMSI 636020658 (vessel);
  • Delfina (5LJW7) Crude Oil Tanker Liberia flag; MMSI 636022667 (vessel);
  • Liliana (AUHB) Crude Oil Tanker Liberia flag; MMSI 636024578 (vessel);
  • Paola (5LTG7) Chemical/Products Tanker Liberia flag; MMSI 636024577 (vessel); and
  • Roberta (5LOG7) Oil Products Tanker Liberia flag; MMSI 636023554 (vessel).

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250902

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250902

*******

September 3, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned Guangzhou Tengyue Chemical Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou Tengyue), a chemical company operating in China that is involved in the manufacture and sale of synthetic opioids to Americans.  In addition to opioids, Guangzhou Tengyue has also sold dangerous analgesic chemicals often used as cutting agents that are mixed with synthetic opioids and other illicit drugs.  Also, OFAC sanctioned Huang Xiaojun and Huang Zhanpeng, representatives of Guangzhou Tengyue, who were directly involved in coordinating the shipments of these illicit drugs and cutting agents to the United States.

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Huang, Xiaojun of China; and
  • Huang, Zhanpeng of China.

The following entity has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Guangzhou Tengyue Chemical Co., Ltd of China.

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250903

*******

September 4, 2025: The State Department designated Three foreign NGOs—Al Haq, Al Mezan Center for Human Rights (Al Mezan), and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR)—pursuant to Executive Order 14203, “Imposing Sanctions on the International Criminal Court.” These entities have directly engaged in efforts by the International Criminal Court (ICC) to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute Israeli nationals, without Israel’s consent.

The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued International Criminal Court-related General License 10, "Authorizing the Wind Down of Transactions Involving Certain Persons Blocked on September 4, 2025.

GENERAL LICENSE NO. 10 “Authorizing the Wind Down of Transactions Involving Certain Persons Blocked on September 4, 2025”

(a) All transactions prohibited by the International Criminal Court-Related Sanctions Regulations (ICCSR), 31 CFR part 528, that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind down of any transaction involving one or more of the following blocked persons are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, October 4, 2025, provided that any payment to a blocked person is made into a blocked interestbearing account located in the United States, in accordance with the ICCSR:

(1) Al Haq Law in the Service of Mankind;

(2) Al Mezan Center for Human Rights;

(3) Palestinian Centre for Human Rights; or

(4) Any entity in which one or more of the above persons own, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest.

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Al Haq – Law in the Service of Mankind of Palestine;
  • Al Mezan Center for Human Rights of Palestine; and
  • Palestinian Centre for Human Rights of Palestine.

https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2025/09/sanctioning-foreign-ngos-directly-engaged-in-iccs-illegitimate-targeting-of-israel/

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934606/download?inline

*******

September 8, 2025: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) implemented sanctions against a large network of scam centers across Southeast Asia that steal billions of dollars from Americans using forced labor and violence.  The action includes nine targets operating in Shwe Kokko, Burma, a notorious hub for virtual currency investment scams under the protection of the OFAC-designated Karen National Army (KNA), as well as ten targets based in Cambodia.

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Chen, Al Len of China;
  • Dong, Lecheng of Cambodia;
  • OO, Saw Min Min of Burma;
  • She, Zhijiang of China;
  • Su, Liangsheng of China;
  • Win, Tin of Burma; and
  • Xu, Aimin of China.

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List;

  • Chit Linn Myaing Mining and Industry Company Limited of Burma;
  • Chit Linn Myaing Toyota Company Limited of Burma;
  • Chit Linn Mying Co., Ltd. of Burma;
  • Heng He Bavet Propert Co Ltd of Cambodia;
  • HH Bank Cambodia PLC of Cambodia;
  • K B Hotel Co Ltd of Cambodia;
  • K B X Investment Co Ltd of Cambodia;
  • M D S Heng He Investment Co Ltd of Cambodia;
  • Myanmar Yatai International Holding Group Co., Ltd. of Burma;
  • Shwe Myint Thaung Yinn Industry and Manufacturing Company Limited of Burma;
  • T C Capital Co Ltd of Cambodia; and
  • Yatai International Holding Group Limited of Thailand.

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0237

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250908

*******

September 11, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is designating 32 individuals and entities and identifying four vessels in Treasury’s largest sanctions action to date targeting Iran-backed Ansarallah, commonly known as the Houthis.  The networks targeted are part of the Houthis’ global illicit fundraising, smuggling, and weapons procurement operations, and include Houthi-associated companies, their owners, and other key Houthi operatives located in Yemen, China, the United Arab Emirates, and the Marshall Islands.

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Al Faqih, Saddam Ahmad Mohammad of Yemen;
  • Al Sharafi, Zaid Ali Yahya of Yemen;
  • Al-Dawla, Mohammed Ahmed of Yemen;
  • Al-Hammadi, Nasr Hussein of China;
  • Al-Nahari, Hisham Abdulwasea Hael Mohammed of Yemen;
  • Al-Nahari, Mohammed Abdulwasea Hael of China;
  • Al-Shaer. Abdullah Mesfer Saleh of Yemen;
  • Al-Suwaidi, Ibrahim Mohsen of Yemen;
  • Dubaysh, Salih of Yemen;
  • Khalil, Khaled Muhammad of Yemen; and
  • Li, Ying, Linfen, Shaanxi of China.

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Al Faqih International Trade, Import, and Oil Services Limited of Yemen;
  • Al-Hammadi Trading Shipping and Clearance Co., Ltd. of China;
  • Azal Company of Yemen;
  • General Holding Corporation For Real Estate Development and Investment of Yemen;
  • Guangzhou Nahari Trading Co., Ltd. of China;
  • Guangzhou Yakai International Freight Forwarding Co., Ltd. of China;
  • Hubei Chica Industrial Co., Ltd. of China;
  • Irtiqa For Development and Qualification Technical Institute of Yemen;
  • Kamaran Industry and Investment Company of Yemen;
  • MT Tevel Incorporated of the Marshall Islands;
  • Oil Primer Company of Yemen;
  • Royal Plus Petroleum Derivatives Import of Yemen;
  • Sam Oil Company For Trade and Oil Services Ltd of Yemen;
  • Shandong Mingming New Material Technology Co., Ltd. of China;
  • Shanxi Shutong Import and Export Trade Co. Ltd. of China;
  • Shenzhen Shengnan Trading Co., Ltd. of China;
  • Silm Road Company For Trading and Importing of Yemen;
  • Star MM Inc. of the Marshall Islands;
  • Tyba Ship Management DMCC of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Yemen Armored Comprehensive Security Services and Exhibitions Organization Company Ltd of Yemen; and
  • Yiwu Wan Shun Trading Company Limited of China.

The following vessels have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Black Rock (3E3938) Chemical/Oil Tanker Panama flag; MMSI 352986196;
  • Nobel M (8P2547) Chemical/Oil Tanker Barbados flag; MMSI 314001017;
  • Shira (V2YH8) Chemical/Oil Tanker Antigua and Barbuda flag; MMSI 304135000; and
  • Star MM (V2YT5) Crude Oil Tanker Antigua and Barbuda flag; MMSI 305077000.

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250911

*******

September 12, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) imposed sanctions on two Sudanese Islamist actors - Gebreil Ibrahim Mohamed Fediel (Gebreil) and the Al-Baraa Bin Malik Brigade (BBMB) - for their involvement in Sudan’s brutal civil war and their connections to Iran. These sanctions aim to limit Islamist influence within Sudan and curtail Iran’s regional activities, which have contributed to regional destabilization, conflict, and civilian suffering. The United States remains committed to working with regional partners to achieve peace and stability in Sudan, ensuring that the country does not become a safe haven for those who threaten Americans and the national interests of the United States.

The following individual has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Fediel, Gebreil Ibrahim Mohamed of Sudan.

The following entity has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Al-Baraa Bin Malik Brigade.

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250912

*******

September 16, 2025:  The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)  designated a pair of Iranian financial facilitators and more than a dozen Hong Kong- and United Arab Emirates (UAE)-based individuals and entities for their roles in coordinating funds transfers, including from the sale of Iranian oil, that benefits the IRGC-Qods Force (QF), and Iran’s Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics (MODAFL).  Iranian “shadow banking” networks like these—run by trusted illicit financial facilitators - abuse the international financial system, and evade sanctions by laundering money through overseas front companies and cryptocurrency.  The IRGC-QF and MODAFL use these proceeds to support regional terrorist proxy groups and develop advanced weapons systems, including ballistic missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), which threaten the security of U.S. forces and those of our allies.

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Alivand, Arash Estaki of Iran;
  • Derakhshan, Alireza of Iran;
  • Derakshan, Vahid of Iran; and
  • Karimi, Leila of Iran.

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Alliance First Trading L.L.C of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Alpa Hong Kong Limited of China;
  • Alpa Investment L.L.C of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Alpa Trading – FZCO of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Everest International L.L.C of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Minato Commercial Brokers of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Minato Goods Wholesalers of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Minato Investment L.L.C of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Paul Ad Sons Trading FZE of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Powell International FZE of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Powell Raw Materials Trading L.L.C of the United Arab Emirates; and
  • Unique Station Trading of the United Arab Emirates.

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250916

*******

September 17, 2025: The United States remains committed to countering Iran, the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism, and disrupting Iran-aligned militia groups (IAMGs) from conducting attacks against U.S. personnel and facilities. The Department of State announced the designations of IAMGs Harakat al-Nujaba, Kata’ib Sayyid al-Shuhada, Harakat Ansar Allah al-Awfiya, and Kata’ib al-Imam Ali as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs).

The following changes have been made to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Harakat Al-Nujaba of Iraq;
  • Harakat Ansar Allah Al-Awfiya of Iraq;
  • Kata’ib Al-Imam Ali of Iraq; and
  • Kata’ib Sayyid Al-Shuhada of Lebanon.

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250917

*******

September 18, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated Sinaloa Cartel faction Los Mayos, along with the leader of the faction’s armed wing.  These sanctions follow Under Secretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence John K. Hurley’s visit to the U.S.-Mexico border.

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Arcega Aguirre, Candelario of Mexico;
  • Brown Figueredo, Hilda Araceli of Mexico;
  • Gonzalez Lomeli, Jesu of Mexico;
  • Herrera Sanchez, Karlo Omar of Mexico;
  • Herrera Sanchez, Mario Alberto of Mexico;
  • Paez Pereda, Carlos Alberto of Mexico; and
  • Ponce Felix, Juan Jose of Mexico.

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Alimentos y Diversion Insurgentes, S. DE R.L. DE C.V. of Mexico;
  • Cavally Antro and Bar of Mexico;
  • Coco Beach Bar, S. DE R.L. DE C.V. of Mexico;
  • Complejeo Turistico JJ, S.A. DE C.V. of Mexico;
  • Gotoco Alimentos Procesados S. DE R.L. DE C.V. of Mexico;
  • Grupo Hotelero JJJ, S.A. DE C.V. of Mexico;
  • Grupo JRCP, S. DE R.L. of Mexico;
  • JJ Gonver S. DE R.L. DE C.V. of Mexico;
  • JR Alimentos Del Mar, S. De R.L. De C.V. of Mexico;
  • Los Mayos of Mexico;
  • Operadora De Espectaculos, Alimentos y Bebidas J and R S.A. DE C.V.;
  • Sabor Tapatio of Mexico;
  • Sunset Servicios Gastronomicos DE R.L. DE C.V. of Mexico;
  • Transporte Urbano y Suburbano Del V Municipio S.A. DE C.V.; and
  • Veintiuno Mexicali, S. De R.L. DE C.V.

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250918

*******

September 22, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned the Lex Instituto de Estudos Juridicos LTDA (Lex Institute) for its support to Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) justice Alexandre de Moraes (de Moraes).  De Moraes was designated by OFAC on July 30, 2025, for using his position to authorize arbitrary pre-trial detentions and suppress freedom of expression in Brazil.  Also designated was Viviane Barci de Moraes (Viviane), de Moraes’ wife, who serves as the head of the Lex Institute.

The following individual has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Barci Deo Moraes, Viviane of Brazil.

The following entity has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Lex Instituto de Estudos Juridicos LTDA of Brazil

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250922

*******

September 23, 2025: The Department of State designated Barrio 18 as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT).

Barrio 18 is one of the largest gangs in our hemisphere and has conducted attacks against security personnel, public officials, and civilians in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras.

The United States will continue to protect our nation by keeping illicit drugs off our streets and disrupting the revenue streams funding the violent and criminal activity of vicious gangs and drug cartels.

The following entity has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Barrio 18 of El Salvador.

https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2025/09/terrorist-designation-of-barrio-18/

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250923

*******

September 24, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned two Indian nationals, Sadiq Abbas Habib Sayyed and Khizar Mohammad Iqbal Shaikh, for their role in collectively supplying hundreds of thousands of counterfeit prescription pills filled with fentanyl and other illicit drugs to victims across the United States.  OFAC also designated one India-based online pharmacy for its role in these criminal operations.

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Sayyed, Saqid Abbas Habib of India; and
  • Shaikh, Khizar Mohammed Iqbal of India.

The following entity has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • KS International Traders of India.

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250924

*******

September 25, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned five individuals and one entity for their role in generating illicit revenue for the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) government’s weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and ballistic missile programs, including by selling weapons to the Burmese military regime.

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Aung, Tin Myo of Burma;
  • Kim, Yong Ju of North Korea;
  • Myint, Kyaw Thu Myo of Burma;
  • Nam, Chol Ung of North Korea; and
  • Oo, Aung Ko Ko of Burma.

The following entity has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Royal Shune Lei Company Limited of Burma.

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250925

*******

September 29, 2025: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued Russia-related General License 13O, “Authorizing Certain Administrative Transactions Prohibited by Directive 4 under Executive Order 14024”.

GENERAL LICENSE NO. 13O: “Authorizing Certain Administrative Transactions Prohibited by Directive 4 under Executive Order 14024”

  • S. persons, or entities owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a U.S. person, are authorized to pay taxes, fees, or import duties, and purchase or receive permits, licenses, registrations, certifications, or tax refunds to the extent such transactions are prohibited by Directive 4 under Executive Order 14024, Prohibitions Related to Transactions Involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, provided such transactions are ordinarily incident and necessary to the day-to-day operations in the Russian Federation of such U.S. persons or entities, through 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time, January 9, 2026.

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934646/download?inline

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250929

LATEST EXPORT CONTROLS AND COMPLIANCE UPDATES SEPTEMBER 2025 Read More »

BIS50% Rule – BIS/EAR New Ownership Test

By George Canovas, Vice President, Compliance; Creighton Chin, Senior Compliance Associate

Edited by Jenny Hahn, President, FD Associates

I. Introduction

On June 19, 2025, I wrote an article “Understanding the 50% Rule: How BIS Is Rewriting Export Control Boundaries.” I ended this article with “No drama, no panic. Just preparation. Because when this rule lands, and it will, you’ll want to be ready, not surprised.” Well, it landed on September 29, 2025 and the question of “who really owns the company you are dealing with” is now a reality. That question has now become central to compliance. On September 29, 2025, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) amended 15 C.F.R. §744.11 and its Supplements 4 and 7, extending restrictions to any entity that is fifty percent or more owned, directly or indirectly, by a party on the Entity List or the Military End User (MEU) List.

The Affiliates Rule goes further than the Entity List and MEU List. BIS extended the 50 percent ownership test to affiliates of parties designated under certain OFAC Specially Designated National (SDN) programs identified in 15 C.F.R. §744.8(a). It also extends the Foreign Direct Product (FDP) rules under §734.9(e), including the Russia/Belarus MEU FDP rule, so that foreign-produced items meeting FDP criteria through the involvement of a covered affiliate are now subject to EAR license requirements.

To be clear, these companies are now automatically subject to the same restrictions as their listed entities. This significant policy shift is not an isolated change but rather the culmination of a long regulatory evolution that began with the International Traffic in Arms Regulations’ (ITAR) foreign ownership rules, matured with the Office of Foreign Assets Control’s (OFAC) 2014 50% guidance, and has now fully integrated into the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) framework, making ownership a cornerstone of export compliance that demands a thorough understanding of its history and implications to prepare for what lies ahead.


II. Executive Takeaways

  • Effective immediately. The BIS Affiliates Rule took effect September 29, 2025.
  • Short window of relief. A Temporary General License (TGL) applies only through November 28, with strict limits.
  • Covers Entity List, MEU List, and SDN programs. Ownership links to these parties now trigger license requirements.
  • Foreign Direct Product rules included. Affiliates bring foreign-produced items under EAR controls if FDP criteria are met.
  • Ownership is cumulative. Direct and indirect stakes are aggregated at each tier of the chain.
  • Cascade effect. Subsidiaries of subsidiaries are restricted once the 50% threshold is crossed.
  • Most restrictive rule applies. If multiple restricted owners exist, the toughest license policy governs.
  • Branches and divisions are covered. Even non-legally distinct operations fall under the Affiliates Rule.
  • EAR99 is no safe harbor. Simple, uncontrolled items still require a license when affiliates are involved.
  • Red Flag 29 adds a duty. Exporters must resolve ownership uncertainties or stop the transaction.
  • CSL is no longer sufficient. Screening lists won’t catch all covered affiliates; ownership due diligence is mandatory.
  • Petition process available. Non-listed affiliates can request BIS modification to exclude them if risk is low.
  • Savings clause. Shipments already en route on Sept. 29 can be completed by Oct. 29 without a license.
  • Universities and research institutions affected. Especially those with foreign partnerships or end-users tied to listed entities.
  • Small and mid-sized defense firms at risk. Limited compliance resources make ownership checks harder to scale.
  • Tech startups vulnerable. Venture funding and opaque ownership create exposure under the rule.
  • Multinationals with JVs hit hard. Especially in aerospace, energy, and high-tech with ties to China, Russia, or sanctioned hubs.
  • Financial institutions implicated. Banks, PE, and law firms must incorporate ownership into diligence and financing reviews.
  • Global supply chains disrupted. Transactions through Europe, the Middle East, or Asia may suddenly become restricted.
  • Immediate compliance upgrades needed. Companies must expand screening, enhance KYC, escalate reviews, and train staff.
  • FD Associates is ready. We assist with risk assessment, red flag resolution, and tailored compliance strategies to keep exporters ahead of enforcements.

III. FOCI and ITAR - The First Ownership Gatekeeper

The path to this moment is not new. The ITAR Regulations tied ownership to compliance decades ago. Under 22 C.F.R. §120.16, the definition of a “foreign person” includes entities under foreign ownership or control. For cleared contractors, the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM) at 32 C.F.R. Part 117 requires mitigation of Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence, usually through proxy boards, voting trusts, or technology control plans.

Crucially, the ITAR does not leave “ownership” and “control” undefined. 22 C.F.R. §120.65 expressly sets out what counts as ownership and control in this context, clarifying that both direct and indirect power to direct the policies of management of a company triggers ITAR coverage. Crossing the fifty percent ownership threshold has never automatically barred participation in defense contracting, but it has always presumed foreign influence and triggered mitigation. The message from ITAR was clear: ownership and control cannot be separated from compliance.

IV. OFAC and the Birth of the 50% Rule (2014)

The sharper turn came from sanctions. In August 2014, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued its Revised Guidance on Entities Owned by Persons Whose Property and Interests in Property Are Blocked. This guidance, grounded in 31 C.F.R. §500.310 and elaborated in OFAC’s published FAQs (398 and 401 through 403), confirmed that any entity fifty percent or more owned by one or more blocked persons is itself treated as blocked. The rule aggregates ownership stakes, so two sanctioned parties holding twenty-five percent each are treated the same as one holding fifty percent. Indirect ownership through shell companies also counts. Once blocked under the fifty percent rule, an entity remains blocked absent specific OFAC authorization. That guidance forced a shift across industry: list screening alone was no longer sufficient, because without knowing who owned a counterparty, one could not know whether the transaction was legal.

V. EAR and BIS Expansion (2014–2020)

BIS absorbed the same logic over time. Under 15 C.F.R. §744.11, the agency has long designated parties on the Entity List when their activities are deemed contrary to U.S. security. In 2020, BIS added 15 C.F.R. §744.21, creating a framework for “military end use” and “military end users” in China, Russia, and Venezuela. The Military End User List, set out in Supplement No. 7 to Part 744, formalized this approach. These rules did not yet impose a bright-line ownership test, but they tied export controls to affiliations and relationships that often turned on state ownership. The system was moving toward a recognition that control through ownership was itself an end-use risk.

VI. The September 29, 2025 BIS Rule

On September 29, 2025, BIS announced an interim final rule that decisively aligns its regulations with OFAC’s 2014 guidance by declaring that any subsidiary or affiliate owned 50 percent or more by an Entity List or MEU List party is automatically treated as if it were listed, eliminating loopholes that allowed clean subsidiaries to act as export fronts for listed parents, accounting for indirect ownership through layered structures and offshore holding companies, flagging significant minority ownership as a red flag requiring enhanced due diligence, and providing companies with a short transition period to unwind deals, re-screen counterparties, and update contracts before enforcement begins. This rule represents a full alignment of BIS’s approach with OFAC’s sanctions framework and ITAR’s FOCI principles, closing a critical gap in export control enforcement and reshaping compliance obligations across industries.

It is important to note where ownership is shared among multiple restricted parties, for example, one on the Entity List and another on the MEU List, BIS requires that the most restrictive licensing requirements apply, even if one owner’s stake is small. This “most restrictive” standard means exporters must trace and aggregate ownership across all restricted categories to evaluate license eligibility.

The September 29, 2025 BIS Rule

VI. The September 29, 2025 BIS Rule

The reach of the rule is not theoretical. BIS illustrated in its Federal Register notice that if Company A is on the Entity List and owns 50 percent of Company B, which is not listed, then Company B is automatically subject to the Entity List restrictions. If Company B in turn owns 50 percent of Company C, then Company C is also restricted. The chain continues, even if the later-tier affiliates never appear on a BIS list. (See above)

VII. Country Risk Under the BIS 50% Rule

The September 29, 2025 BIS “50% Rule” expansion has different practical consequences depending on the country where your business or partners operate. Certain jurisdictions are far more likely to host Entity List or Military End User (MEU) parties, or to conceal beneficial ownership through state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and opaque holding structures.

High Risk (Directly Implicated)

  • China, Hong Kong, Macau – Largest concentration of Entity List and MEU List parties. State-owned enterprises hold controlling stakes in aerospace, AI, quantum, and semiconductor firms. Even civilian-facing firms may be majority-owned by listed parents.
  • Russia – Extensive Entity List coverage, particularly in aerospace, energy, and defense-industrial sectors. Sanctioned oligarch ownership structures are common.
  • Iran – Wide-ranging restrictions, with nearly all major industrial entities majority-owned or controlled by sanctioned parties.
  • Belarus – High overlap with Russian military-industrial base and sanctions.

Moderate Risk (Targeted Sectors, Regional SOEs)

  • Venezuela – State-owned energy, mining, and defense companies frequently appear on BIS/OFAC lists.
  • North Korea – Already nearly comprehensive embargo, but risk lies in indirect dealings via third countries.
  • United Arab Emirates (select free zones/partners) – While not sanctioned, the UAE hosts intermediaries and holding structures that can obscure Chinese, Russian, or Iranian ownership. Enhanced diligence required.
  • Turkey – Growing scrutiny for dual-use exports and middleman roles in Russia-related transactions.
  • Cyprus – Also known as a transshipment point where companies are setup to facilitate transactions with China and Russia.

Lower but Not Zero Risk

  • India, Malaysia, Singapore – Generally lower baseline risk, but technology hubs can attract Chinese/Russian capital or host opaque investment vehicles.
  • Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Argentina) – Lower Entity List presence, but risk arises when firms are partly owned by Chinese SOEs or used as transshipment points.

NOTE: This list is not all encompassing.

  • EAR99 Implications are SUBSTANTIAL

 

  1. EAR99/ECCN”99” in General

EAR99/ECCN “99” items are those not specifically listed on the Commerce Control List or are listed with an ECCN number with a 99 in it (i.e. 9A991- the AT controlled ECCNs). They typically don’t require a license for export to most destinations. But, and this is the critical point, they are still subject to end-use and end-user controls under Part 744 of the EAR. That means if your counterparty is restricted, EAR99/ECCN “99” status doesn’t help as it would continue to require export licensing, and because of a presumption of denial, it would likely not be approved.

  1. How the 50% Rule Changes the Landscape

Under the new rule (amended 15 C.F.R. §744.11 and its supplements), any entity that is 50% owned by an Entity List or MEU Listed party is treated as if it were itself listed.

That means:

  • Even EAR99 or AT controlled items (previously no license required) require a license if they are destined to such an entity.
  • The presumption of denial that applies to listed entity and MEU parties applies equally to their majority-owned subsidiaries, no matter the classification of the item.
  • A shipment of innocuous EAR99 or AT controlled spares, software, or support materials can now be just as prohibited as a controlled ECCN 9A610 or 3B001 item if the recipient falls under the new ownership test.
  1. Examples

Imagine a U.S. company shipping common replacement fasteners classified EAR99 to a European distributor. On the surface, the distributor looks clear, it is not a named on the Entity List. But under the new rule, because it is 55 percent owned by a Chinese aerospace conglomerate already on the Entity List, that distributor is treated as listed. Suddenly, the EAR99 fasteners require a license from BIS, and that license will likely be denied.

Or consider a university sending EAR99 lab consumables to an overseas research partner. If the partner university is majority-owned by a foreign state entity that appears on the MEU List, the transaction is restricted even though the items are not controlled.

  1. The EAR Takeaway

The September 29, 2025 rule makes it clear that classification alone does not insulate you from ownership risk. EAR99 or AT controlled (previously no license required commodities) no longer represents a “safe harbor” when the recipient is owned by a listed entity. Screening for ownership is now as important as screening for the entity name itself. For exporters and compliance teams, the message is blunt: if you don’t know who owns your counterparty, you don’t know whether you can legally ship, even if all you are sending is EAR99.

IX. Who This Hits Hardest

The new rule falls hardest on companies that lack the resources or visibility to conduct deep ownership checks. Small and medium-sized enterprises are at the front line. Many rely on thin compliance budgets and basic screening tools, which makes them especially vulnerable when their distributors, resellers, or investors are majority-owned by listed parties. A Virginia-based commercial drone quadcopter company, for example, might sell through a European distributor that appears clean in standard screening, only to discover it is 60 percent owned by a Chinese aerospace conglomerate on the Entity List. In that situation, every shipment becomes un-licensable, enforcement risk escalates, and prime contractors disengage.

Tech startups in dual-use fields face a different but equally severe challenge. Venture funding that tips foreign ownership past fifty percent can instantly flip their licensing posture from compliant to prohibited. One financing round can jeopardize the ability to ship, partner, or even continue operations in the U.S. market.

Larger multinational firms are also caught when joint ventures with state-owned enterprises shift into restricted territory. Even if the venture itself has never appeared on a list, once majority ownership by a listed entity is established, the restrictions apply. This creates contractual uncertainty, operational disruption, and reputational risk in industries like aerospace, energy, and advanced manufacturing.

Financial institutions and professional services firms also bear new exposure. Banks, private equity funds, and law firms structuring transactions in jurisdictions such as Cyprus, the British Virgin Islands, or Hong Kong may inadvertently become conduits for restricted ownership structures if diligence stops at name screening. These sectors must now implement forensic-level beneficial ownership checks to avoid entanglement with listed parents.

X. Real World Example of Complexity

The Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) is explicitly listed on the Military End User List (MEU) under BIS’s Supplement No. 7 to Part 744744 and is also listed on the Entity List, Supplement No. 4 to Part 744 of the EAR.  As a Chinese state-owned aerospace and defense conglomerate, AVIC maintains a vast portfolio of subsidiaries and equity stakes, many of which straddle civilian and military sectors.

Because AVIC is an MEU, under the September 29, 2025 “50 % Rule,” any entity that is 50 percent or more owned (directly or indirectly) by AVIC is now treated as though it were similarly restricted—even if that entity has never been named on a BIS list itself.

Several publicly reported U.S. connections illustrate how this might play out in practice:

  • AVIC owns Cirrus Aircraft, which is headquartered in Minnesota, making Cirrus a U.S. subsidiary of a Chinese aerospace conglomerate.
  • Through acquisitions, AVIC has gained control of or influence over U.S. firms in aerospace and component manufacturing, including the U.S.–based steering systems company Nexteer Automotive. In 2010, Nexteer, based in Michigan, was acquired by a subsidiary of AVIC.
  • AVIC has also acquired U.S. component firms and supply chain assets, such as Continental Aerospace Technologies (through which it indirectly controls Thielert, Southern Avionics, and Danbury Aerospace).
  • AVIC also has dozens of subsidiary companies in Europe either from U.S. owned companies or European founded companies.

Think about a U.S. company shipping basic avionics part to a domestic or a foreign subsidiary of a U.S. company in Europe. On paper, everything looks fine, the distributor isn’t on any government list and it passes routine screening. But, if that distributor is a majority owned by a U.S. company and that company is ultimately controlled by AVIC in China, the new BIS rule makes the transaction restricted.

The outcome is simple and costly as a license would be required, and it would almost certainly be denied. That means the exporter risk in losing or delaying contracts, facing compliance penalties and damaging its reputation with prime contractors.

The rule also makes clear that branches and non-legally distinct operations of listed entities are treated as affiliates, closing another common gap. The lesson is clear. It is not enough to know who you are selling to by name. You need to know who owns them.

XI. Steps to Address the New Era

The September 29 rule makes clear that traditional denied party list screening alone is not enough. To address the new ownership-based obligations under 15 C.F.R.§744.11 and it supplements companies and its employees must take the following steps:

  1. Conduct Beneficial Ownership Checks. Move beyond surface screening. For all counterparties determine the direct and indirect owners, including through registries, corporate filings and reliable commercial databases.
  2. Request certified ownership structure. Develop and implement a certification that requires counterparties to certify their structure.
  3. Escalate complex structures. When ownership appears opaque or layered through offshore companies, escalate immediately to the Empowered Official or legal team. Do not proceed with the transaction until you are given the trade compliance all-clear.
  4. Document Ownership Diligence. Documentation is your friend here, having a process can demonstrate and are following for all international transactions is imperative. Maintain records of how the ownership was determined, what sources were used and any escalation decisions. Remember that documentation is critical for demonstrating compliance in an audit.
  5. Train Staff and Suppliers. Provide annual training on the BIS 50% rule on OFAC parallel ownership rule Make clear that EAR99 and AT controlled ECCN’s are not exempt when the counterparty is majority-owned by a listed entity.
  6. Assume Presumption of Denial. For transactions involving majority owned affiliates of listed parties, do not rely on licensing as a fallback. BIS has indicated such licenses will face a presumption of denial.

BIS created two procedural relief mechanisms.

  • First, a savings clause allows shipments that were already en route on September 29 pursuant to actual orders to be completed without a license if they arrive by October 29, 2025.
  • Second, non-listed affiliates captured solely through ownership may petition BIS under §744.16(e) or §744.21(b)(2) to request that their parent’s entry be modified to exclude them if diversion risk is demonstrably low.

NOTE: In addition, BIS created a new Red Flag 29 in Supplement No. 3 to Part 732. If an exporter has reason to know that a counterparty may be majority-owned by a listed party but cannot determine the exact ownership, there is now an affirmative duty to resolve the question. If ownership cannot be confirmed, the transaction must be stopped unless a BIS license is obtained. Simply screening names is no longer enough.

XII. Conclusion

The rule is effective immediately as of September 29, 2025. BIS also issued a Temporary General License (TGL) that remains in effect through November 28, 2025. The TGL is narrow. It allows certain exports, reexports, and transfers involving affiliates captured only by ownership, provided either: (1) the destination is in Country Group A:5 or A:6, or (2) the affiliate is a joint venture with a U.S. or A:5/A:6 partner that is not itself majority-owned by a restricted party. The TGL does not apply if the affiliate is owned in any percentage by a Specially Designated National under a §744.8 program, and it only suspends the new ownership-based license requirement. All other EAR requirements remain in place. This change means that list screening alone is no longer enough. Exporters must be able to identify the beneficial owners of their counterparties, document how that determination was made, and escalate cases where ownership is opaque. Even shipments of EAR99 and AT controlled items will now require a license if the counterparty is majority-owned by a listed entity, and those licenses will almost always be denied.

The takeaway is clear. Ownership checks must become a standard part of every compliance program, alongside classification and licensing. Companies that do not adapt quickly will face blocked transactions, contract losses, and heightened enforcement risk once the 60-day window closes.

At FD Associates we understand that the September 29, 2025 rule doesn’t just raise the compliance bar, it fundamentally changes how business must approach ownership, risk and due diligence. Our team has decades of experience interpreting BIS and OFAC guidance, and designing compliance programs that work in the real world, not just on paper. We can discuss strategies to address these obligations.

Whether you are a startup navigating foreign investment, a smaller or mid-tier defense supplier under pressure from primes, or a multinational with joint ventures abroad, FD Associates can help you map beneficial ownership, evaluate exposure under the 50% rule, and put in place procedures and safeguards regulators expect. The rule may be blunt, but the path forward does not have to be. With the right partner, companies can protect contracts, reduce risk, and stay ahead of enforcement.

FD Associates is that partner. Please reach out to use at +1.703.847.5801 or info@fdassociates.net

BIS50% Rule – BIS/EAR New Ownership Test Read More »

What the Latest ITAR Revisions Mean for Small Businesses – September 2025

George (Jorge) Cánovas Vice President – Compliance FD Associates, Inc.

By George (Jorge) Cánovas

Vice President – Compliance

FD Associates, Inc.

When most people hear the phrase International Traffic in Arms Regulations or ITAR, they imagine crates of missiles, stealth fighters, or nuclear warheads. They do not picture an underwater robot used by a marine survey company, a high-performance antenna that can be fitted on a commercial airframe, or a piece of body armor sold through a subcontractor. Yet those are precisely the kinds of items the law can capture. Many of you are specifically aware of this and how nuances can matter to include end users and forward manufacturing.

For readers who have never worked with these rules, or work tangentially with the ITAR in a business development or management position, the ITAR is the regulatory framework administered by the U.S. Department of State (DoS) that controls exports of defense articles, services, and related technical data. The backbone of the system is the U.S. Munitions List, a dense catalog of categories ranging from firearms to avionics to chemical precursors. If your work or your businesses work appears on that list, you cannot transfer it abroad or share it with foreign persons inside the United States without approval. And “export” does not just mean shipping. Letting a foreign engineer review controlled design drawings in your office can be treated exactly the same way as sending a crate of parts across a border.

This is not an academic concern. A small business that never thought of itself as part of the defense sector can suddenly find that its products, software, or even research activities fall under ITAR, which can occur when the DoS’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) modifies the rules. When that happens, the company must apply for licenses through the DDTC, keep meticulous records, and adapt to a new world of restrictions and oversight. Licenses can take weeks or months and may come with conditions that change how and when you deliver to customers. Penalties for violations are severe, running from multimillion-dollar fines to loss of export privileges. It can also go the other way, and relive companies if the items they produce, sell, etc., have been removed.

A Final Rule with Far-Reaching Impact

On August 27, 2025, the State Department published a final rule in the Federal Register amending key sections of ITAR. This rule revises the U.S. Munitions List, updates definitions, and creates a new license exemption. It builds on an interim rule issued in January 2025 and is explicitly framed as part of a broader strategy to streamline defense trade and deepen cooperation with U.S. allies and partners[1]. The timing was no accident. A few months earlier, President Biden signed Executive Order 14268, Reforming Foreign Defense Sales to Improve Speed and Accountability, which directed the Departments of State and Defense to review the U.S. Munitions List to ensure it focuses on the most sensitive technologies while clearing away unnecessary restrictions.

The rule removes several items that the government no longer believes provide a critical military advantage. Certain GNSS anti-spoofing and anti-jam systems, some controlled reception pattern antennas, airborne collision avoidance system antennas, and tungsten- or steel-based lead-free birdshot are all being shifted off the USML. Once removed, they fall under Department of Commerce jurisdiction and the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), meaning they remain regulated for export but in a less restrictive framework.

At the same time, the final rule strengthens control. It makes permanent temporary controls on items “specially designed” for the F-47 Next Generation Air Dominance Platform[2]. It clarifies definitions around advanced military aircraft. It also responds to public comments that highlighted the civil use of large autonomous underwater vehicles. Recognizing the importance of these systems to sectors like energy, telecommunications, and marine research, the rule creates a new license exemption that allows U.S. companies to participate in operations involving certain Underwater Unmanned Vehicles performing functions such as inspecting offshore pipelines, repairing telecom cables, or conducting search and rescue missions, without the full weight of ITAR licensing. This is a striking acknowledgment of the dual-use reality of twenty-first century technology.

DDTC also emphasized that these revisions are not final. The agency continues to welcome input from the public, inviting companies and researchers to identify items they believe should be revised, removed, or added in future updates. This willingness to consult is unusual in the world of arms control and underscores a trend toward more transparent, iterative management of the U.S. Munitions List.

If your company works in aerospace, maritime technology, advanced electronics, protective equipment, chemicals or any sector that develops products with potential dual-use application, we strongly suggest the you read the attached Federal Register Notice . The revision may address technology that your company handles, makes or develops. The revision reshapes what falls under the ITAR and what shifts to Commerce, falling into the EAR. These changes carry real consequences for how you classify your products, pursue contracts, and handle foreign partnerships. Even if you have never considered yourself part of the defense supply chain, these changes could quietly alter your obligations.

Overview of the Changes In-Process

Items removed from the U.S. Munitions List (now under EAR) under the new revisions[3]:

  • Certain Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) anti-spoofing systems
  • Certain GNSS anti-jam systems
  • Controlled Reception Pattern Antennas (CRPAs) for Position, Navigation, and Timing (PNT)
  • Airborne Collision Avoidance System (ACAS) antennas
  • Tungsten- and steel-based lead-free birdshot projectiles

Items added or clarified under ITAR control[4]:

  • Items “specially designed” for the F-47 Next Generation Air Dominance Platform (now permanently controlled) USML Category VIII(a)(7) – permanently controls items specially designed for advanced military aircraft, including the F-47.
  • Foreign advanced military aircraft, explicitly defined to include those with AESA (Active Electronically Scanned Array) fire-control radars, integrated electronic warfare and signature management systems, and beyond-visual-range targeting capability USML Category XI(b) – electronic systems, equipment, or software specially designed for military electronic warfare, countermeasure, and surveillance functions.
  • Body armor and protective equipment, revised to reflect the current National Institute of Justice performance standards (USML X)
  • Energetic materials and chemical precursors, including poly-NIMMO and CL-20-related compounds (USML V)
  • Revised definitions for certain electronic warfare equipment, excluding some civil navigation gear but tightening controls on military countermeasure, see USML Category XI(b)

New ITAR Exemption:

  • ITAR License Exemption ITAR §123.16(b)(15) (newly created exemption in the Final Rule) is added for Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs) under 8,000 pounds may be exported temporarily without an ITAR license when used for civil purposes such as scientific research, natural resource exploration, infrastructure inspection or repair (including oil and gas pipelines and telecom cables), and search and rescue operations.

What It Means for Small Businesses

For a small company, the consequences are immediate and tangible. A firm producing antennas or sensors may suddenly find that while many models are now subject to the EAR, certain advanced or military-configured versions remain ITAR-controlled. That reclassification affects the markets the firm can serve, the partnerships it can form with larger primes, and the way investors assess its risk profile.

Consider also the opportunities. A marine robotics startup might benefit from the new UUV exemption. Instead of months of waiting on a license, it could send a vehicle overseas for a civil infrastructure project with far fewer delays provided the company is registered with DDTC. That advantage is real, but only if the company can prove it qualifies, document the mission, and keep meticulous control of the platform.

A chemical supplier may need to revisit formulations now listed by name in the U.S. Munitions List or a software developer whose algorithms strengthen satellite navigation against spoofing may find itself removed from the ITAR and now under the EAR  jurisdiction, which is less restrictive for some destinations but carries its own set of risks.

The common thread is that export classification is critical to all exporters. ITAR is not just associated with missiles, tanks and stealthy aircraft, it touches electronics, materials science, robotics, and software.

For small businesses, the difference between opportunity and liability often lies in whether leadership is paying attention to how their company products, software, technology and services are controlled and the reason that executives must clearly understand the liabilities, as well as business strategic opportunities. If your business can navigate these opportunities correctly and with foresight, you will be the company with the competitive edge, which equates to profits.

Foreign Businesses Should Take Notice

These ITAR US Munitions List revisions should also matter deeply for foreign companies. ITAR follows the item, not just the U.S. manufacturer. A distributor in Europe handling American-made products cannot re-export them freely without reexport authorization. A shipyard in Asia servicing vessels with U.S. navigation equipment must comply with U.S. licensing rules. Even a foreign research consortium that touches U.S. technical data can be pulled into the ITAR regime. Foreign companies need to be knowledgeable on specific changes to the ITAR and the EAR if they do business in the defense sector.

What may not be obvious is that compliance can be a competitive advantage. Executive Order 14268 is explicit about its intent: to streamline defense trade, facilitate cooperation with allies, and reduce unnecessary burdens. For a foreign company seeking to enter the U.S. defense supply chain, demonstrating a mature understanding of ITAR and the EAR is not a box-checking exercise it is a selling point. American primes and government customers increasingly want foreign partners who can handle controlled technology without fear of violations. Firms that invest in compliance now are better placed to win contracts, attract U.S. partners, and be viewed as credible contributors to joint defense projects.

The executive order behind this rule makes the logic plain, that is; by focusing the U.S. Munitions List on the most sensitive technologies and easing controls elsewhere, the U.S. government is trying to speed up defense trade with trusted allies. Foreign businesses that align early, adopt compliance systems, and train their staff are positioning themselves not only to stay safe but also to grow faster in a global marketplace that prizes reliability and accountability.

A Note on Research Institutions

Although this article focuses on businesses, academic research institutions are not immune to the ITAR and the evolution of changes in the regulations. University labs often work with technologies that straddle the civil–military divide. An engineering department experimenting with advanced antennas, a marine science institute operating an underwater vehicle, or a chemistry lab developing new energetic materials can all find themselves pulled into ITAR. The presence of foreign students adds further complexity, since allowing access to controlled data counts as an export under the law. U.S. institutions operating off U.S. soil can find themselves in even a more complex situation. What is clear is that institutions that fail to update their technology control plans, and their internal compliance programs risk both regulatory exposure, reputational harm and the loss of valuable grant opportunities.

Final Thoughts

The September 2025 rule is not simply a regulatory housekeeping exercise. It is part of a deliberate strategy to make the U.S. export control system more precise, more responsive, and more supportive of international cooperation. For small businesses, it is a reminder that compliance is inseparable from competitiveness. For foreign firms, it is a signal that mastering ITAR and the EAR is a way to distinguish themselves as reliable partners in the U.S. defense market. And for research institutions, it is another push to integrate export awareness into daily life.

In the end, these revisions tell a story of adaptation, as it is clear that the U.S. government wants to protect the warfighter’s edge without smothering innovation. Businesses that fully embrace and comply, whether in Virginia or Paris, will not only stay on the right side of the law but will also gain an advantage in a world where compliance is itself a mark of credibility.

Please contact FD Associates if you have any questions or our team of experts can help to position your enterprise to have a clear competitive edge and ensure profits, not liabilities end up on your P&L statement.

© FD Associates, Inc., 703-847-5801 – 1945 Old Gallows RD, Suite #530, Vienna, VA 22182

What the Latest ITAR Revisions Mean for Small Businesses – September 2025 Read More »

AUGUST 2025 EXPORT CONTROLS AND COMPLIANCE UPDATES

This newsletter is a listing of the latest changes in export control regulations through August 31, 2025.  The newsletter is provided as a complimentary service to assist exporters with their ITAR and EAR export compliance responsibilities. It provides a summary of recent changes to export control regulations or other regulatory matters of interest that may impact your company’s international trade and export compliance functions. Call us at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net with questions or comments.

 

See also our “Latest Sanctions Fines & Penalties” section below for an update on companies and

persons denied export privileges by the United States Government.

 

REGULATORY UPDATES

 

Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC)

 

Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls: Notifications to the Congress of Proposed Commercial Export Licenses

 

August 8, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 33462: The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls and the Department of State give notice that the attached Notifications of Proposed Commercial Export Licenses were submitted to the Congress on the dates indicated.

 

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_public_portal_news_and_events

 

*******

 

International Traffic in Arms Regulations: U.S. Munitions List Targeted Revisions

 

August 27, 2025: 90 Fed. Reg. 41778: The Department of State published a final rule in the Federal Register to amend §§ 121.0, 121.1, and 126.9 of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) making revisions to the U.S. Munitions List (USML), adding and updating definitions, and creating a new license exemption.

 

This rule is one in a series of rules that streamlines defense trade and facilitates cooperation with U.S. allies and partners while reducing the regulatory burden for exporters, in support of the President’s April 9, 2025, Executive Order (E.O.) 14268, “Reforming Foreign Defense Sales to Improve Speed and Accountability,” which directs the Departments of State and Defense to review the USML to focus its protections.

 

This final rule expands on the interim final rule published January 17, 2025 (the IFR), and makes other changes based on DDTC’s ongoing assessments and periodic review of the USML.  The revisions and the new exemption will take effect on September 15, 2025.

The rule includes revisions designed to promote the competitiveness of the U.S. defense industrial base, while continuing to protect the warfighter’s edge.  With this rule, DDTC also takes steps to reduce unnecessary regulatory burden and act consistently with the President’s order to focus the USML on the most sensitive technologies.

 

This rule removes the following items from the USML, as the Department has determined they no longer provide a critical military or intelligence advantage:

 

  • Certain Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) anti-spoofing and GNSS anti-jam systems
  • Certain Controlled Reception Pattern Antennas (CRPAs) for Position, Navigating, and Timing (PNT) purposes
  • Airborne Collision Avoidance System (ACAS) antennas
  • Tungsten- and steel-based lead-free birdshot projectiles

 

Items removed from the USML will become subject to Commerce’s Export Administration Regulations (EAR).

 

In response to public comments identifying commercial applications of some extra-large autonomous underwater uncrewed vessels (UUVs) that will be described in USML Category XX(a)(10), this final rule adds a new exemption from ITAR licensing requirements to facilitate U.S. participation and collaboration in certain tasks that use these UUVs, specifically: scientific research, natural resource exploration, certain commercial or civil infrastructure operations (e.g., oil and gas pipeline inspections, telecommunication cable repairs), or search and rescue operations.

 

This rule also includes revisions that improve the clarity and usability of the regulations, and the preamble to the rule provides clarifications in response to public comments on the IFR.  Finally, this rule makes permanent the existing temporary controls on items specially designed for the F-47 Next Generation Air Dominance Platform.

 

Although it is not seeking public comment in this final rule, the Department of State welcomes submissions from members of the public identifying specific descriptions of items that, in their view, the Department of State should consider revising, removing, or adding to the USML in future rulemaking. Members of the public are often uniquely positioned to provide information that can assist the Department of State in its review of the USML, including technology developments, commercial use of defense technology, and industry interpretation and application of particular terminology.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/27/2025-16382/international-traffic-in-arms-regulations-us-munitions-list-targeted-revisions

 

*******

 

60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Statement of Political Contributions, Fees, and Commissions Relating to Sales of Defense Articles and Defense Services

 

August 28, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 41866: The Department of State is seeking Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval for the information identified in the title. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we are requesting comments on this collection from all interested individuals and organizations. The purpose of this notice is to allow 60 days for public comment preceding submission of the collection to OMB.

 

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_public_portal_news_and_events

 

*******

60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Nontransfer and Use Certificate

 

August 28, 2025: 90 Fed. Reg. 41471: The Department of State is seeking Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval for the information collection described in the title. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we are requesting comments on this collection from all interested individuals and organizations. The purpose of this notice is to allow 60 days for public comment preceding submission of the collection to OMB.

 

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_public_portal_news_and_events

 

*******

 

DDTC Name And Address Changes Posted To Website

 

August 12 through 13, 2025: The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) posted the following name and/or address changes on its website at    

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_kb_article_page&sys_id=bd72ca0adbf8d30044f9ff621f961981:

  • Name change of ATLAS ELEKTRONIK GmbH to TKMS ATLAS ELEKTRONIK GmbH due to acquisition;
  • Name change of GF Machining Solution AG to United Machining Mill AG due to acquisition;
  • Name and address change of NVL B.V. Co. ZKG, Zum Alten Speicher 11 28759 Bremen, Germany to Civmec Limited (CVL), 16 Nautical Drive, Henderson, WA due to change in ownership; and
  • Name and address change of Luerssen Australia Pty Ltd. (Luerssen), 16 Nautical Drive, Henderson, WA 6166 to Civmec Defence Industries (CDI), 16 Nautical Drive, Henderson, WA 6166 due to ownership change.

 

*******

 

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA)

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Ukraine

 

August 5, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Ukraine has requested to buy equipment; repair services; and long-term sustainment support for M777 howitzers. The following non-MDE items will be included: technical assistance; training; publications; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $104 million. The principal contractor will be BAE Systems, located in Barrow-in-Furness, England. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4266194/ukraine-equipment-repair-services-and-sustainment-support-for-m777-howitzers

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Ukraine

 

August 5, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Ukraine has requested to buy transportation and consolidation services in support of security assistance programs and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $99.5 million. The principal contractor(s) will be determined from approved vendors. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4266161/ukraine-transportation-and-consolidation-services

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Australia

 

August 6, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Australia has requested to buy equipment and services to support maintenance of its MC-55A aircraft fleet, to include major and minor modifications; spare parts; consumables and accessories; repair and return support; U.S. government and contractor engineering; technical, and logistics support services; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $404 million. The principal contractor will be L3 Harris, located in Greenville, TX. At this time, the U.S. government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4267141/australia-mc-55a-baseline-2-upgrade

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Canada

 

August 8, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Canada has requested to buy a fleet of up to sixty (60) Joint Light Tactical Vehicles (JLTVs); and up to nine (9) JLTV cargo trailers. The following non-MDE items will also be included: communication equipment; mobility equipment; lethality and survivability enhancements; spare and repair parts; special tools and test equipment (STTE); technical manuals and publications; maintenance trainers; new equipment training; total package fielding support; depot level maintenance/repair and return support; U.S. Government and contractor technical, engineering, and logistics personnel services; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total program cost is $160 million. The principal contractors will be AM General, LLC, located in Auburn Hills, MI and Mishawaka, IN. The purchaser typically requests offsets. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4270288/canada-joint-light-tactical-vehicles

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Nigeria

 

August 13, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Nigeria has requested to buy one thousand two (1,002) MK-82 general purpose 500 lbs bombs; one thousand two (1,002) MXU-650 Air Foil Groups (AFGs) for 500 lb Paveway II GBU-12; five hundred fifteen (515) MXU-1006 AFGs for 250 lbs Paveway II GBU-58; one thousand five hundred seventeen (1,517) MAU-169 or MAU-209 computer control group (CCG) for Paveway II GBU-12/GBU-58; one thousand two (1,002) FMU-152 joint programmable fuzes; and five thousand (5,000) Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System II (APKWS II) all-up-rounds (AURs) (consisting of one each WGU-59/B guidance section (GS); high-explosive warhead; and MK66-4 rocket motor). The following non-MDE items will also be included: FMU-139 joint programmable fuzes; bomb components, impulse cartridges, and high-explosive and practice rockets; integration support and test equipment; U.S. Government and contractor technical, engineering, and logistics personnel services; and other related elements of logistical and program support. The total estimated program cost is $346 million. The principal contractors will be RTX Missiles and Defense, Tucson, AZ; Lockheed Martin Corporation, Archibald, PA; and BAE Systems, Hudson, NH. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4273754/nigeria-munitions-precision-bombs-and-precision-rockets

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Bahrain

 

August 14, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Bahrain has requested to buy four (4) M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS); and three (3) International Field Artillery Tactical Data Systems. The following non-MDE items will also be included: M28A2 Low Cost Reduced Range Practice Rocket Pods; High Mobility Multi-Purpose Wheeled Vehicle Fire Direction Centers; M1084A3 HIMARS resupply vehicles; HIMARS Driver Vision Enhancer systems; AN/PSN-13 Defense Advanced GPS Receiver; support and test equipment; simulators; generators; integration and test support; spares and repair parts; communications equipment; software delivery and support; facilities and construction support; publications and technical documentation; personnel training and training equipment; support equipment; U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics support services; studies and surveys; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $500 million. The principal contractor will be Lockheed Martin, located in Grand Prairie, TX. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4274789/bahrain-m142-high-mobility-artillery-rocket-system

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Australia

 

August 19, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Australia has requested to buy one hundred sixty-one (161) Lightweight Command Launch Units (LwCLU) that will be added to a previously implemented case whose value was under the congressional notification threshold. The original Foreign Military Sales (FMS) case, valued at $6.3 million ($0 in Major Defense Equipment (MDE)), included Javelin Life Cycle Support (LCS) and U.S. Government and contractor technical assistance. This notification is for one hundred sixty-one (161) Lightweight Command Launch Units (LwCLU). The following non-MDE items will also be included: Javelin LwCLU Basic Skills Trainer; missile simulation rounds and battery coolant unit; electronic technical manual and operator manuals; life cycle support; physical security inspection; spare parts; System Integration and Check Out; U.S. Government and contractor technical assistance, engineering, logistics, and personnel services; tool kits; training; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $97.3 million. The principal contractors will be the Javelin Joint Venture between RTX Corporation, located in Arlington, VA; and Lockheed Martin, located in Orlando, FL. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4279065/australia-javelin-lightweight-command-launch-unit

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To United Kingdom

 

August 26, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of the United Kingdom has requested to buy equipment and services to support contractor logistics support sustainment for the United Kingdom’s C-17 (Globemaster III) aircraft fleet. The following non-MDE items will be included: engine components, parts, and accessories; major and minor modifications; computer program identification numbers; spare parts, consumables and accessories, and repair and return support; classified and unclassified software delivery and support; classified and unclassified publications and technical documentation; U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics support services; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $861 million. The principal contractor will be The Boeing Company, located in Arlington, VA. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4285993/united-kingdom-c-17-globemaster-iii-aircraft-sustainment-support

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Poland

 

August 26, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Poland has requested to buy equipment and services in support of F-35 sustainment, including the aircraft engine Component Improvement Program (CIP). The following non-MDE items will be included: major and minor modifications; spare parts, consumables and accessories, and repair and return support; weapon system support, including software; classified software and delivery support; classified and unclassified publications and technical documentation; clothing, textiles, and individual equipment; U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics support services; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $1.85 billion. The principal contractor will be General Electric Aerospace, located in Evendale, OH. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4285956/poland-f-35-sustainment

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Ukraine

 

August 28, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Ukraine has requested to buy up to three thousand three hundred fifty (3,350) Extended Range Attack Munition (ERAM) missiles and three thousand three hundred fifty (3,350) Embedded Global Positioning System (GPS)/Inertial Navigation Systems (INS) (EGI) with Selective Availability Anti-Spoofing Module (SAASM), Y-Code, or M-Code. The following non-MDE items will be included: missile containers; stoker pylons; component parts and support equipment; spare parts, consumables and accessories, and repair and return support; weapons software and support equipment; mission planning system hardware; classified software delivery and support; classified and unclassified publications and technical documentation; personnel training and training equipment; transportation support; studies and surveys; U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics support services; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $825 million. The principal contractors will be Zone 5 Technologies and CoAspire. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4289280/ukraine-air-delivered-munitions

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Ukraine

 

August 29, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Ukraine has requested to buy equipment and services to support sustainment of its Patriot air defense systems. The following non-MDE items will be included: classified and unclassified spare parts; maintenance support; classified and unclassified software and software updates; system modifications and associated modification kits; test equipment; communication equipment and associated accessories; integration services; repair and return; storage; tooling; Field Surveillance Program; International Engineering Services Program; maintenance support equipment; U.S. Government and contractor representative technical assistance; training; engineering and logistics support services; classified and unclassified publications and technical documentation; classified software; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total program cost is $179.1 million. The principal contractors will be RTX Corporation, located in Arlington, VA; and Lockheed Martin, located in Bethesda, MD. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4290514/ukraine-patriot-air-defense-system-sustainment

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Ukraine

 

August 29, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Ukraine has requested to buy an extension of satellite communications services for its Starlink terminals. The following non-MDE items will be included: U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics support services; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $150 million. The principal contractor for this effort will be Starlink Services, located in Hawthorne, CA. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4290506/ukraine-satellite-communications-services

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Denmark

 

August 29, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Denmark has requested to buy thirty-six (36) PATRIOT MIM-104E guidance enhanced missile-tactical (GEM-T) ballistic missiles; twenty (20) PATRIOT Advanced Capability-3 (PAC-3) Missile Segment Enhancement (MSE) missiles; two (2) AN/MPQ-65 radar sets; two (2) Engagement Control Stations (ECS); two (2) Radar Interface Units (RIU) modification kits; six (6) PATRIOT M903A2 launching stations (LS); six (6) Integrated Battle Command System (IBCS) Software Launcher Integrated Network Kits (LINKs); two (2) IBCS Engagement Operations Centers (EOCs); two (2) IBCS Integrated Collaborative Environments (ICE); six (6) IBCS integrated fire control network (IFCN) relays; and two (2) Electrical Power Plants III (EPP III). The following non-MDE items will also be included: communications equipment including, but not limited to, AN/TPX–57A identification friend or foe (IFF), Defense Advanced Global Positioning System (GPS) Receiver (DAGR), AN/PYQ-10 Simple Key Loader, KIV-77 encryptor, KG-250X Inline Network Encryptor, IPS-250X HAIPE Encryptor, future Combat Net Radio, and AN/PRC-163 radio; tools and test equipment; support equipment; generators; publications and technical documentation; training equipment including the Air Defense Reconfigurable Trainer; spare and repair parts; personnel training; Technical Assistance Field Team support; U.S. Government and contractor technical assistance and services, engineering, and logistics support; System Integration and Checkout; field office support; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $8.5 billion. The principal contractors will be RTX Corporation, located in Arlington, VA; Lockheed-Martin, located in Dallas, TX; and Northrop Grumman, located in Falls Church, VA. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4290506/ukraine-satellite-communications-services

 

 

*******

 

Department of Commerce – Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

 

August 19, 2025:  90 Fed. Reg. 40326: The Department of Commerce announced the addition of 407 product categories to the list of “derivative” steel and aluminum products covered by Section 232 sectoral tariffs.  As a result, the steel and aluminum content of these products will be subject to a duty rate of 50%.  This action covers wind turbines and their parts and components, mobile cranes, bulldozers and other heavy equipment, railcars, furniture, compressors and pumps, and hundreds of other products.

 

Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security Jeffrey Kessler stated:

“This action expands the reach of the steel and aluminum tariffs and shuts down avenues for circumvention – supporting the continued revitalization of the American steel and aluminum industries.”

This is the latest in a series of historic steps by the Trump Administration to strengthen America’s steel and aluminum industry.  In February, President Trump issued Proclamations 10895 and 10986, which eliminated numerous carve-outs from the Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs and cracked down on tariff misclassification and duty evasion schemes. These proclamations also directed Commerce, within 90 days, to establish a process for adding steel and aluminum derivative products to the Section 232 tariffs – which Commerce did in May. In June, President Trump issued Proclamation 10947, which increased the tariff rate for steel and aluminum from 25% to 50%, making the tariffs stronger than ever.

Under Commerce’s steel and aluminum product inclusion process, there are three annual windows for the public to submit product inclusion requests. The next window will open in September and will be announced in the Federal Register.

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/19/2025-15819/adoption-and-procedures-of-the-section-232-steel-and-aluminum-tariff-inclusions-process

*******

Commerce Eases Export Controls on Syria

August 28, 2025: The Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published a rule easing licensing requirements for civilian exports to Syria.

The rule implements the policy on Syria established in Executive Order 14312, “Providing for the Revocation of Syria Sanctions” (June 30, 2025).  EO 14312 declared the United States’ commitment to supporting a Syria that is stable, unified, and at peace with itself and its neighbors.  EO 14312 called for the removal of sanctions on Syria, and it also issued waivers that allow for the relaxation of export controls on Syria.

As a result of this rule, U.S.-origin goods, software, and technology that have purely civilian uses (i.e., those classified under BIS’s regulations as “EAR99”), as well as consumer communications devices and certain items related to civil aviation, can generally go to Syria without an export license.  In addition, this rule facilitates the approval of licenses for exports to Syria related to telecommunications infrastructure, sanitation, power generation, and civil aviation. All other applications for exports of dual-use items to Syria will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. BIS will continue to restrict exports when the end-users of items are malign actors, including certain Syrian individuals and entities that remain subject to sanctions.

https://media.bis.gov/press-release/commerce-eases-export-controls-syria

*******

Department of Commerce Closes Export Controls Loophole for Foreign-Owned Semiconductor Fabs in China

August 29, 2025: The Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) closed a Biden-era loophole that allowed a handful of foreign companies to export semiconductor manufacturing equipment and technology to China license-free. Now these companies will need to obtain licenses to export their technology, putting them on par with their competitors.

The loophole is known as the Validated End-User (VEU) program. In 2023, the Biden Administration expanded the VEU program to allow a select group of foreign semiconductor manufacturers to export most U.S.-origin goods, software, and technology license-free to manufacture semiconductors in China. No U.S.-owned fab has this privilege — and now, following this decision, no foreign-owned fab will have it either.

Former VEU participants will have 120 days following publication of the rule in the Federal Register to apply for and obtain export licenses. Going forward, BIS intends to grant export license applications to allow former VEU participants to operate their existing fabs in China. However, BIS does not intend to grant licenses to expand capacity or upgrade technology at fabs in China.

https://media.bis.gov/press-release/department-commerce-closes-export-controls-loophole-foreign-owned-semiconductor-fabs-china

*******

U.S. Census Bureau

Foreign Trade Regulations: Clarification of Filing Requirements Regarding In-transit Shipments and other Foreign Trade Regulations Provisions

August 14, 2025: The Census Bureau’s Economic Management Division (EMD) announced the publication of a Final Rule which provides instructions when foreign goods enter the U.S. for consumption or warehousing and are subsequently exported.  Additionally, this proposed rule revises several sections, including definitions, mandatory filing requirements, responsibilities of parties to the export transaction, confidentiality, penalty provisions, and voluntary self-disclosures to ensure clarity, accuracy, and consistency throughout the FTR.

The Final Rule can be found in its entirety at Federal Register: Foreign Trade Regulations (FTR): Clarification of Filing Requirements Regarding In-Transit Shipments and Other FTR Provisions

*******

 

Foreign Trade Regulations (FTR): Clarification of Filing Requirements Regarding In-Transit Shipments and Other FTR Provisions

 

August 14, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 39112: The Bureau of the Census (Census Bureau) issues this final rule to clarify its regulations governing in-transit shipments from foreign countries through the United States that are subsequently exported to a foreign destination. Specifically, the final rule addresses the identification of the U.S. Principal Party in Interest (USPPI) in scenarios where goods are entered into the United States for consumption or warehousing and subsequently stored in a warehouse or storage facility, admitted into a Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ), or entered into a bonded warehouse before being exported. The rule establishes clear guidelines for different parties involved in export transactions. For customs brokers serving as the USPPI, the regulation notes obtaining client consent to provide customs entry information for Electronic Export Information (EEI) filing is required per customs regulations. Similarly, when a warehouse, storage facility, FTZ, or bonded warehouse operator acts as the USPPI, they are responsible for the EEI based on information they possess or have received from other parties to the export transaction. Additionally, this final rule revises several regulatory sections, including definitions, mandatory filing requirements, responsibilities of parties to the export transaction, confidentiality protocols, penalty provisions, and voluntary self-disclosure processes to ensure greater clarity, accuracy, and consistency throughout the FTR.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/14/2025-15493/foreign-trade-regulations-ftr-clarification-of-filing-requirements-regarding-in-transit-shipments

 

*******

 

Upcoming Changes to AESDirect for State of Origin

 

August 15, 2025: This message is a follow-up to the broadcast that was released on August 14, 2025, titled Foreign Trade Regulations (FTR): Clarification of Filing Requirements Regarding In-transit Shipments and other FTR Provisions. In the final rule the U.S. Census Bureau changed the name of the “Address of the USPPI” to “Address of Origin”.  As a result, the field names under the USPPI section in AESDirect will change to the following:

Current Field Names New Field Names After Change
Address – Line 1 Address of Origin – Line 1
Address – Line 2 Address of Origin – Line 2
Postal Code Postal Code of Origin
City City of Origin
State State of Origin

The USPPI Address and State of Origin fields are defined identically—both require the filer to report the location where goods begin their journey to the port of export and as a result these fields should match. We are changing the field names to clarify that the USPPI address represents the origin of movement, not the address associated with the USPPI EIN or headquarters address. The updates to the field names will be active in AESDirect on August 19, 2025 after 2:00pm EDT.

Additionally, there will be front-end edits added in AESDirect that will validate matching information for the State of Origin in the USPPI section in Step 2 compared to the State of Origin reported in Step 1. Filers must ensure the full address is updated and reported as the location from which the goods actually begin the journey to the port of export as defined in section 30.6(a)(1)(ii) and 30.6(a)(4) of the FTR.

Note for Template and Profile Users: Filers must edit or delete any existing Shipment Templates or Party Profiles in AESDirect that may include incorrect USPPI Address information.  As a reminder, the Shipment Template Manager and Party Profile Manager can be found under the ‘Tools Menu’ located at the top right of your Shipment Manager screen.  For instructions on managing Shipment Templates and Party Profiles, please refer to the ACE AESDirect User Guide.

*******

How to Resolve Common AES Response Messages

August 18, 2025: When submitting your Electronic Export Information (EEI) to the Automated Export System (AES), you can receive different response messages: Fatal, Compliance, Verify, Informational and Warning.  It is important that AES filers address and/or correct Response Messages as soon as they are received to comply with the Foreign Trade Regulations.

To help you take the appropriate action, here is guidance on how to address one of the most frequent Response Messages that were generated in the AES for the previous month.

 

Response Code:  8W1

Narrative:     Shipping Weight/Quantity 1 Out of Range

Severity:       Verify

 

Reason: For the reported Schedule B/HTS Number, the Shipping Weight/Quantity (1) ratio is outside of the expected range.

Resolution: For a particular Schedule B/HTS Number reported, the shipping weight divided by the first quantity should fall within a certain parameter based on historical statistical averages for that commodity. Ratios outside this pre-determined parameter might indicate either a keying error or misclassification of the product.

 

Verify the Shipping Weight, Quantity 1, and Schedule B/HTS Number, correct the shipment and resubmit (if necessary).  If the line item is verified correct as reported, no action is necessary.

For a complete list of the AES Response Codes, their reasons and resolutions, see Appendix A – Commodity Filing Response Messages.

 

LATEST SANCTIONS FINES & PENALTIES

 

This section of our newsletter provides information on the latest sanctions, fines and penalties for export violations or matters of non-compliance with the ITAR or EAR issued by the US government enforcement agencies. It is provided as a service to exporters and associates of FD Associates to remind them of the importance of extreme due diligence in all international trade and export compliance matters, particularly those involving exports subject to the ITAR or the EAR. Don’t let this happen to you or your company! Call us with questions or concerns at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net.

 

Fines and Penalties

 

Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

 

August 18, 2025: In federal court in Brooklyn, dual U.S. and Russian national Vadim Yermolenko was sentenced by United States District Judge Hector Gonzalez to 30 months in prison for his role in an illicit procurement and money laundering network that sought to acquire ammunition and sensitive dual-use electronics for Russian military and intelligence services. In addition to the term of imprisonment, Judge Gonzalez ordered Yermolenko to pay a forfeiture money judgment of $75,547.00.  Yermolenko pleaded guilty in November 2024 to conspiracy to violate the Export Control Reform Act, bank fraud conspiracy, and conspiracy to defraud the United States.

 

https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/new-jersey-resident-sentenced-30-months-prison-role-global-export-control-and

 

*******

 

August 21, 2025: At the federal courthouse in Brooklyn, an eight-count indictment was unsealed charging Maxim Larin for his involvement in a scheme to illegally export weapons parts and accessories from the United States to other countries, including Kazakhstan, which serve as transshipment points for materials destined for Russia.  The indictment charges Larin with conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to violate the Export Control Reform Act, conspiracy to violate the Arms Export Control Act, attempted violation of the Arms Export Control Act, smuggling goods from the United States, and submission of false export information. Larin was arrested in Plantation, Florida and made his initial appearance in federal court in Miami. He will be arraigned in the Eastern District of New York at a later date.

 

https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/firearms-parts-dealer-arrested-scheme-illegally-export-weapons-parts-and-firearms

 

*******

 

August 28, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 41969: On June 8, 2023, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Imelda Jimenez (“Jimenez”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554(a). Specifically, Jimenez was convicted of smuggling firearms from the U.S. to Mexico. As a result of her conviction, the Court sentenced Jimenez to 30 months of imprisonment and two years of supervised release.

 

Based on BIS’ review of the record and consultations with BIS’ Office of Exporter Services, including its director, and the facts available to BIS, BIS has decided to deny Jimenez’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of seven years from the date of Jimenez’s conviction. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Jimenez had an interest at the time of her conviction.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/28/2025-16525/in-the-matter-of-imelda-jimenez-434-plantano-brownsville-tx-78521-order-denying-export-privileges

 

*******

 

August 28, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 41970: On May 1, 2024, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Gabriel Daniel Pinnace (“Pinnace”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554(a). Specifically, Pinnace was convicted of smuggling firearms from the U.S. to Venezuela. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Pinnace to 72 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release.

 

Based on BIS’ review of the record and consultations with BIS’ Office of Exporter Services, including its director, and the facts available to BIS, BIS has decided to deny Pinnace’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of 10 years from the date of Pinnace’s conviction. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Pinnace had an interest at the time of his conviction.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/28/2025-16522/in-the-matter-of-gabriel-daniel-pinnace-inmate-number-77450-510-fci-oakdale-ii-federal-correctional

 

*******

 

August 28, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 41978: On May 10, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Francisco Dario Mora (“Mora”) was convicted of (among other crimes) violating 18 U.S.C. 371 and 18 U.S.C. 554(a). Specifically, Mora was convicted of conspiring to smuggle firearms, ammunition and magazines from the United States to Mexico. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Mora to 60 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release.

 

Based on BIS’ review of the record and consultations with BIS’ Office of Exporter Services, including its director, and the facts available to BIS, BIS has decided to deny Mora’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of 10 years from the date of Mora’s conviction. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Mora had an interest at the time of his conviction.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/28/2025-16521/in-the-matter-of-francisco-dario-mora-2130-s-7th-avenue-tucson-az-85713-order-denying-export

 

*******

 

August 28, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 41981: On February 14, 2024, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, (“Gallegos”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554 (a) (Smuggling Goods from the United States). Specifically, Gallegos was convicted of smuggling firearms from the United States to Mexico. As a result of her conviction, the court sentenced Gallegos to 60 months in prison and three years of supervised release.

 

Based on BIS’ review of the record and consultations with BIS’ Office of Exporter Services, including its director, and the facts available to BIS, BIS has decided to deny Gallegos’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of 10 years from the date of Gallegos’s conviction. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Gallegos had an interest at the time of her conviction.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/28/2025-16533/in-the-matter-of-jasmine-desire-gallegos-inmate-number-61075-509-fpc-bryan-po-box-2149-bryan-tx

 

*******

 

August 28, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 41985: On November 30, 2023, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Juan Manuel Cervantes-Aceves (“Cervantes-Aceves”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554(a). Specifically, Cervantes-Aceves was convicted of smuggling firearms and magazines from the United States to Mexico. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Cervantes-Aceves to four years of probation.

 

Based on BIS’ review of the record and consultations with BIS’ Office of Exporter Services, including its director, and the facts available to BIS, BISI has decided to deny Cervantes-Aceves’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of 10 years from the date of Cervantes-Aceves’s conviction. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Cervantes-Aceves had an interest at the time of his conviction

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/28/2025-16528/in-the-matter-of-juan-manuel-cervantes-aceves-5226-e-23rd-street-tucson-az-85042-order-denying

 

*******

 

August 28, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 41968: On October 10, 2023, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Martina Juanita Gil (“Gil”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554(a). Specifically, Gil was convicted of smuggling one thousand (1,000) rounds of .45 caliber ammunition and two thousand (2,000) rounds of 9mm ammunition from the U.S. to Mexico. As a result of her conviction, the Court sentenced Gil to 12 months and one day of imprisonment, with credit for time served, and three years of supervised release.

 

Based upon BIS’ review of the record and consultations with BIS’ Office of Exporter Services, including its Director, and the facts available to BIS, BIS has decided to deny Gil’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of five years from the date of Gil’s conviction. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Gil had an interest at the time of her conviction.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/28/2025-16516/in-the-matter-of-martina-juanita-gil-2721-e-caldwell-street-phoenix-az-85042-order-denying-export

 

*******

 

August 28, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 41972: On November 30, 2023, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Guadalupe Gil (“Gil”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554(a). Specifically, Gil was convicted of smuggling one thousand (1,000) rounds of .45 caliber ammunition and two thousand (2,000) rounds of 9mm ammunition from the U.S. to Mexico. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Gil to 41 months, with credit for time served, and three years of supervised release.

 

Based on BIS’ review of the record and consultations with BIS’ Office of Exporter Services, including its director, and the facts available to BIS, BIS has decided to deny Gil’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of 10 years from the date of Gil’s conviction. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Gil had an interest at the time of his conviction.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/28/2025-16523/in-the-matter-of-guadalupe-gil-2721-e-caldwell-street-phoenix-az-85042-order-denying-export

 

*******

 

August 28, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 41973: On November 17, 2023, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, Cesar David Piz Corona (“Corona”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554(a). Specifically, Corona was convicted of smuggling a Springfield Armory XDm 9mm handgun and a Beretta M9 from the United States to Mexico. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Corona to 21 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release.

 

Based on BIS’ review of the record and consultations with BIS’ Office of Exporter Services, including its director, and the facts available to BIS, BIS has decided to deny Corona’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of five years from the date of Corona’s conviction. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Corona had an interest at the time of his conviction.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/28/2025-16519/in-the-matter-of-cesar-david-piz-corona-830-n-lamb-blvd-space-3-las-vegas-nv-89110-order-denying

 

*******

 

August 28, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 41977: On June 11, 2024, in the U.S. District Court for the District Southern of Texas, Jose Guadalupe Mejia (“Mejia”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554(a). Specifically, Mejia was convicted of attempting to export 701 rounds of assorted ammunition from the United States to Mexico, without the required authorization from the U.S. Department of Commerce. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Mejia to 46 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release.

 

Based on BIS’ review of the record and consultations with BIS’ Office of Exporter Services, including its director, and the facts available to BIS, BIS has decided to deny Mejia’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of 10 years from the date of Mejia’s conviction. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Mejia had an interest at the time of his conviction.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/28/2025-16527/in-the-matter-of-jose-guadalupe-mejia-inmate-number-37825-510-fci-beaumont-low-federal-correctional

 

*******

 

August 29, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 41979: On December 5, 2023, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Prince Bediako (“Bediako”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554. Specifically, Bediako was convicted of smuggling fraudulently obtained vehicles from the United States to Ghana. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Bediako to 28 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release.

 

Based on BIS’ review of the record and consultations with BIS’ Office of Exporter Services, including its director, and the facts available to BIS, BIS has decided to deny Bediako’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of seven years from the date of Bediako’s conviction. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Bediako had an interest at the time of his conviction.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/28/2025-16535/in-the-matter-of-prince-bediako-3790-longview-drive-douglasville-ga-30135-1370-order-denying-export

 

*******

 

August 28, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 41980: On July 12, 2024, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Kamir Armando Brown Blanchard (“Blanchard”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554. Specifically, Blanchard was convicted of unlawfully exporting firearms from the U.S. to Panama. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Blanchard to 36 months of imprisonment and one year of supervised release.

 

Based on BIS’ review of the record and consultations with BIS’ Office of Exporter Services, including its director, and the facts available to BIS, BIS has decided to deny Blanchard’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of 10 years from the date of Blanchard’s conviction. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Blanchard had an interest at the time of his conviction.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/28/2025-16511/in-the-matter-of-kamir-armando-brown-blanchard-register-number-25223-510-fci-atlanta-po-box-150160

 

*******

 

August 28, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 41972: On August 31, 2023, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Pedro Cruz Almeida, Jr. (“Almeida”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554(a) (Smuggling Goods from the United States). Specifically, Almeida was convicted of smuggling nine hundred (900) rounds of Lake City .50 caliber tracer-equipped linked ammunition, from the United States to Mexico, without the required authorization from the U.S. Department of Commerce. As a result of his conviction, the court sentenced him to 50 months in prison and three years of supervised release.

 

Based on BIS’ review of the record and consultations with BIS’ Office of Exporter Services, including its director, and the facts available to BIS, BIS has decided to deny Almeida’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of 10 years from the date of Almeida’s conviction. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Almeida had an interest at the time of his conviction.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/28/2025-16531/in-the-matter-of-pedro-cruz-almeida-jr-inmate-number-43804-510-fci-beaumont-po-box-26020-bryan-tx

 

*******

 

August 28, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 41974: On July 17, 2024, in the U.S. District Court for the District Southern of New York, Maxim Marchenko (“Marchenko”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554 (Smuggling Goods from the United States). Specifically, Marchenko was convicted of unlawfully causing companies in the United States to export OLED micro-displays from the United States to Russia. Marchenko was also convicted of conspiracy to commit money laundering. As a result of his convictions, the Court sentenced Marchenko to 36 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release.

 

Based on BIS’ review of the record and consultations with BIS’ Office of Exporter Services, including its director, and the facts available to BIS, BIS has decided to deny Marchenko’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of ten (10) years from the date of Marchenko’s conviction. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Marchenko had an interest at the time of his conviction.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/28/2025-16529/in-the-matter-of-maxim-marchenko-inmate-number-78093-510-fci-allenwood-low-federal-correctional

 

*******

 

August 28, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 41978: On April 18, 2024, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Jessica Alvarado (“Alvarado”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554(a). Specifically, Alvarado was convicted of smuggling thirty-three 7.62×39 caliber rifles, three 5.56 caliber rifles, one Ruger .22 caliber carbine rifle, two .45 caliber pistols, and thirty-nine ammunition magazines from the U.S. to Mexico, without a license or written approval from the U.S. Department of Commerce. As a result of her conviction, the Court sentenced Alvarado to 46 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release.

 

Based on BIS’ review of the record and consultations with BIS’ Office of Exporter Services, including its director, and the facts available to BIS, BIS has decided to deny Alvarado’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of 10 years from the date of Alvarado’s conviction. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Alvarado had an interest at the time of her conviction.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/28/2025-16526/in-the-matter-of-jessica-alvarado-inmate-number-42634-510-fpc-bryan-federal-prison-camp-po-box-2149

 

*******

 

August 28, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 41982: On May 16, 2024, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Damian Alejandro Vidal (“Vidal”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554(a). Specifically, Vidal was convicted of smuggling one Sig Sauer, model 1911 .45 caliber handgun and one Glock, model 19, 9mm handgun, from the U.S. to Mexico, without having first obtained the required licenses. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Vidal to 40 months in prison and three years of supervised release.

 

Based on BIS’ review of the record and consultations with BIS’ Office of Exporter Services, including its director, and the facts available to BIS, BIS has decided to deny Vidal’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of eight years from the date of Vidal’s conviction. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Vidal had an interest at the time of his conviction.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/28/2025-16520/in-the-matter-of-damian-alejandro-vidal-inmate-number-93487-510-fmc-fort-worth-federal-medical

 

*******

 

August 28, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 41984: On August 6, 2024, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Miguel Barrera (“Barrera”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554 (Smuggling Goods from the United States) and 18 U.S.C. 1956(a)(2) (Money Laundering). With respect to the smuggling count, specifically, Barrera was convicted of concealing and exporting from the United States, and attempting to export from the United States, firearms and firearms components, knowing that the export of such firearms and firearms components was contrary to law. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Barrera to 80 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release.

 

Based on BIS’ review of the record and consultations with BIS’ Office of Exporter Services, including its director, and the facts available to BIS, BIS has decided to deny Barrera’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of 10 years from the date of Barrera’s conviction. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Barrera had an interest at the time of his conviction.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/28/2025-16534/in-the-matter-of-miguel-barrera-inmate-number-10606-506-fci-fort-dix-federal-correctional

 

 

*******

 

August 28, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 41971: On April 30, 2024, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Vladimir Kuznetsov (“Kuznetsov”) was convicted of violating Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778) (“AECA”). Specifically, Kuznetsov was convicted of knowingly and willfully exporting and attempting to export from the United States to Russia without obtaining required U.S. government authorization rifle parts and accessories designated as defense articles on the United States Munitions List, to wit: one Accuracy International AICS AX MK II rifle chassis, one “H-S Precision” aluminum rifle stock, one “Kinetic Research Group” savage 180-Alpha rifle chassis, one Dakota bolt shroud, one Timney Sportsman trigger assembly, multiple firearm magzines, and other firearms accessories. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Kuznetsov to 46 months in prison and two years of supervised release.

 

Based on BIS’ review of the record and consultations with BIS’ Office of Exporter Services, including its director, and the facts available to BIS, BIS has decided to deny Kuznetsov’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of 10 years from the date of Kuznetsov’s conviction. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Kuznetsov had an interest at the time of his conviction.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/28/2025-16530/in-the-matter-of-vladimir-kuznetsov-inmate-number-91806-053-fci-allenwood-low-federal-correctional

 

*******

 

August 28, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 41975: On March 29, 2024, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Fares Abdo Al Eyani (“Al Eyani”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 371 and Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778) (“AECA”). Specifically, Al Eyani was convicted of conspiring and attempting to illegally export or cause to be exported defense articles to the Sultanate of Oman, without an export license, and in knowing and willful violation of the AECA and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Al Eyani to 12 months and one day of imprisonment and three years of supervised release.

 

Based on BIS’ review of the record and consultations with BIS’ Office of Exporter Services, including its director, and the facts available to BIS, BIS has decided to deny Al Eyani’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of ten (10) years from the date of Al Eyani’s conviction. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Al Eyani had an interest at the time of his conviction.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/28/2025-16541/in-the-matter-of-fares-abdo-al-eyani-3838-turquoise-way-unit-415-oakland-ca-94609-order-denying

 

*******

 

August 28, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 41983: On June 21, 2024, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Chrissie Fier Williams (“Williams”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554 (Smuggling Goods from the United States). Specifically, Willaims was convicted of attempting to export or send firearms, firearms parts and components, and ammunition from the United States to Trinidad & Tobago without required authorization. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Williams to 37 months of imprisonment and two years of supervised release.

 

Based on BIS’ review of the record and consultations with BIS’ Office of Exporter Services, including its director, and the facts available to BIS, BIS has decided to deny Williams’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of 10 years from the date of Williams’s conviction. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Williams had an interest at the time of his conviction.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/28/2025-16532/in-the-matter-of-chrissie-fier-williams-inmate-number-87415-510-fci-allenwood-low-federal

 

Sanctions

 

Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC)

 

August 22, 2025: 90 Fed. Reg. 40458: Pursuant to section 38(g)(4) of the AECA and section 127.7(b) and (c)(1) of the ITAR, the following persons, having been convicted in a U.S. District Court, are denied export privileges and are statutorily debarred as of the date of this notice (Name; Date of Judgment; Judicial District; Case No.; Month/Year of Birth):

 

  • Aldalawi, Rawnd Khaleel; January 11, 2019; Western District of Washington; 2:18-cr-00025; April 1988;
  • Chan, Lionel; June 1, 2021; District of Massachusetts; 1:19-cr-10064; August 1983;
  • Cox, Michael; May 27, 2021; Western District of Pennsylvania; 2:18-cr-00050; May 1975;
  • Duroseau, Jacques Yves Sebastien; March 2, 2021; Eastern District of North Carolina; 4:20-cr-3; May 1986;
  • Garza-Solis, Jacobo Javier; November 4, 2020; Southern District of Texas; 7:17-cr-00360; December 1996;
  • Issa, Jean Youssef; December 20, 2023; Northern District of Ohio; 1:16-cr-00102; June 1974;
  • Koyshman, Josef; February 7, 2020; District of Columbia; 1:19-cr-00267; June 1967;
  • Kuznetsov, Vladimir; May 1, 2024; Eastern District of New York; 1:21-cr-00099; October 1961;
  • Man, Cho Yan Nathan; a.k.a Nathan Man; May 19, 2020; District of Columbia; 1:19-cr-00218; December 1985;
  • Palomares, Jr., Rafael; May 13, 2021; District of Arizona; 2:19-cr-00089; July 1989;
  • Radzi, Muhammad Mohd; June 1, 2021; District of Massachusetts; 1:19-cr-10064; June 1993;
  • Rhoomes, Jermaine Craig; a.k.a. Rhoomas, Jermain; a.k.a. Rhoomas, Jermaine Craig; a.k.a. Rhooms, Jermaine; a.k.a. Hall, Craig; a.k.a. Hall, Kreig; a.k.a. Cow; February 5, 2020; Middle District of Florida; 8:19-cr-00078; April 1973;
  • Rincon-Avilez, Gardenia Marlene; December 16, 2024; District of Arizona; 4:18-cr-01141; July 1986;
  • Schultz, Korbein; April 28, 2025; Middle District of Tennessee; 3:24-cr-00056; May 1999;
  • Senbol, Yuksel; October 31, 2024; Middle District of Florida, 8:23-cr-00384; May 1987;
  • Shifrin, Elena; a.k.a Belov, Alexander; a.k.a Ivanov, Lena; a.k.a Gohkman, Elena; a.k.a. Elena Leonidovna Shifrin; July 23, 2024; Central District of California; 2:21-cr-00259; February 1962; and
  • Stashchyshyn, Michael; July 20, 2021; Western District of Pennsylvania; 2:18-cr-00050; July 1962.

 

At the end of the three-year period following the date of this notice, the above-named persons remain debarred unless a request for reinstatement from statutory debarment is approved by the Department of State.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/19/2025-15725/bureau-of-political-military-affairs-statutory-debarment-under-the-arms-export-control-act-and-the

 

*******

 

Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

 

August 6, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned three high-ranking members and one prominent associate of the Mexico-based Cartel del Noreste (CDN), formerly known as Los Zetas.  CDN, one of the most violent drug trafficking organizations in Mexico, is a U.S.-designated Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) that exerts significant influence over the U.S.-Mexico border, specifically the Laredo, Texas point of entry.  CDN’s influence in the Mexican border cities of Nuevo Laredo, Tamaulipas and Piedras Negras, Coahuila, has affected communities on both sides of the border, and the cartel’s role in fentanyl trafficking and human smuggling into the United States puts American lives at risk.  The individuals being designated play key roles in aiding CDN’s horrific crimes, including assassinations, beheadings, drug trafficking, extortion, and money laundering.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Esqueda Nieto, Francisco Daniel of Mexico;
  • Hernandez Medrano, Ricardo of Mexico;
  • Rodriguez Garcia, Abdon Federico of Mexico; and
  • Romero Sanchez, Antonio of Mexico.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250806 and

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0219

 

*******

 

August 7, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated 18 entities and individuals that play pivotal roles in the Iranian regime’s efforts to generate revenue and circumvent U.S. sanctions.  Facing severe financial constraints due to international isolation, Iran has engineered sophisticated banking schemes and alternate payment messaging systems specifically designed to bypass sanctions and protect its ability to collect export revenues, particularly from illicit petroleum sales.  These systems also enable the regime’s continued funding of its proxies and oppression of the Iranian people.  Additionally, financial and information technology firms designated have provided the regime with advanced surveillance technologies that Iran’s security services deploy to restrict internet access and to target women who violate the regime’s mandatory hijab restrictions.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Berjisian, Adel of Iran;
  • Birang, Ali Morteza of Iran;
  • Fatahinojokambari, Alireza of Iran;
  • Javanmardi, Shahab of Iran;
  • Nouri, Hadi of Iran;
  • Sajjadi, Seyyed Mahmoud Reza of Iran; and
  • Shafipour, Mohammad of Iran.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’S SDN List:

 

  • Arian Pasargad Communications and Information Technology Ecosystem Development Company of Iran;
  • Arian Pasargad Communications and Information Technology Infrastructure Company of Iran;
  • Arman Kish Data Communications and Information Technology Company of Iran;
  • Arvand Arian Pasargad Communications and Information Technology Payment Company of Iran;
  • Cyrus Offshore Bank of Iran;
  • Pasargad Arian Information and Communication Technology Company of Iran;
  • Pasagrad Electronic Payment Services Company of Iran;
  • Qeshim Arian Datis Sofrtware Company of Iran;
  • Rashid Samaneh Electronic Processing Company of Iran;
  • Runc Exchange Systems Company of Iran; and
  • Sherkat-E Barid Fanavar Arian of Iran.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250807 and

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250807

 

*******

 

August 11, 2025: The Department of State designated The Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) and its alias, The Majeed Brigade, as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO), and added the Majeed Brigade as an alias to BLA’s previous Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) designation.

 

The following changes have been made to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Balochistan Liberation Army of Pakistan.

 

https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2025/08/terrorist-designation-of-the-majeed-brigade/ and

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250811

 

*******

 

August 12, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) imposed sanctions on entities linked to armed group violence and the sale of critical minerals in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).  Eastern DRC has experienced thousands of civilian deaths and a mass displacement crisis due to ongoing instability, which has been exacerbated recently by the Rwanda-backed March 23 Movement’s (M23) territorial control and reprisal attacks from DRC-aligned militias.  M23, a U.S.- and United Nations-designated armed group, has rapidly expanded its territorial control in eastern DRC and is responsible for human rights abuses.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Coalition of Congolese Patriotic Resistance-Force De Frappe of the Democratic Republic of the Congo;
  • Cooperative Des Artisanaux Miniers Du Congo of the Democratic Republic of the Congo;
  • East Rise Corporation Limited of the Democratic Republic of the Congo; and
  • Star Dragon Corporation Limited of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250812 and

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions

 

*******

 

August 13, 2025: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued Russia-related General License 125, “Authorizing Transactions Related to Meetings Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Russian Federation in Alaska.”

 

GENERAL LICENSE NO. 125: “Authorizing Transactions Related to Meetings Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Russian Federation in Alaska”

 

  • All transactions prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR), or the Ukraine-/Russia-Related Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 589 (URSR), that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the attendance at or support of meetings in the State of Alaska between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Russian Federation are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, August 20, 2025.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250813_33 and

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934566/download?inline

 

*******

 

August 13, 2025:  The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned four Mexican individuals and 13 Mexican companies linked to timeshare fraud led by the Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion (CJNG).  These individuals and companies are based in or near Puerto Vallarta, a popular tourist destination that also serves as a strategic stronghold for CJNG.  A brutally violent cartel, CJNG is a U.S.-designated Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) that is increasingly supplementing its drug trafficking proceeds with alternative revenue streams such as timeshare fraud and fuel theft.

 

The following individual has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Ibarra Biaz Jr, Michael of Mexico.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Akali Realtors of Mexico;
  • Centro Mediador De La Costa, S.A. DE C.V. of Mexico;
  • Consultorias Profesionales Almida, S.A. of Mexico;
  • Corporative Costa Norte, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico;
  • Corporativo Integral De La Costa, S.A. DE C.V. of Mexico;
  • Fishing Are US, S. DE R.L. DE C.V. of Mexico;
  • Inmobiliaria Integral Del Puerto, S.A. DE C.V. of Mexico;
  • KVY Bucerias, S.A. DE C.V. of Mexico;
  • Laminado Profesional Automotriz Elte, S.A. DE C.V. of Mexico;
  • Santamaria Cruise, S. DE R.L. DE C.V. of Mexico;
  • Servicios Inmobiliarios Ibadi, S.A. DE C.V. of Mexico;
  • Sunmex Travel, S. DE C.V. of Mexico; and
  • TTR Go, S.A. of Mexico.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250813

 

*******

 

August 14, 2025: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)  re-designated the cryptocurrency exchange Garantex Europe OU (Garantex), which has directly facilitated notorious ransomware actors and other cybercriminals by processing over $100 million in transactions linked to illicit activities since 2019.  OFAC also designated Garantex’s successor, Grinex, and taking action against three executives of Garantex and six associated companies in Russia and the Kyrgyz Republic that have supported the exchange’s involvement in malicious cyber activities.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Karavatsky, Pavel of Russia;
  • Mendeleev, Sergey of Russia; and
  • Mira Serda, Aleksandr Khoseluisovich of Russia.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • A7 Agent Limited Liability Company of Russia;
  • A7 Limited Liability Company of Russia;
  • A71 Limited Liability Company of Russia;
  • Exved of Russia;
  • Grinex of Russia;
  • Independent Decentralized Finance Smartbank and Ecosystem of Russia; and
  • Old Vector LLC of Russia.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0225 and

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250814

 

*******

 

August 14, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned two notorious Mexican cartels—Carteles Unidos (a.k.a. “United Cartels”) and Los Viagras—and seven affiliated individuals linked to terrorism, drug trafficking, and extortion in Mexico’s agricultural sector.  Treasury’s action, taken pursuant to counternarcotics and counterterrorism authorities, further implements President Trump’s directive to eliminate completely cartels and transnational criminal organizations threatening the American people.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Barragan Chavez, Luis Enrique of Mexico;
  • Flores, Heladio Cisneros of Mexico;
  • Alvarez, Juan Jose Farias of Mexico;
  • Fernandez, Magallon of Mexico;
  • Orozco Cabada, Edgar Valeriano of Mexico;
  • Sepulveda Arellano, Cesar Alejandro of Mexico; and
  • Sierra Santana, Nicolas.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250814 and

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0224

 

*******

 

August 18, 2025: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated four Costa Rican nationals, as well as two Costa Rica-based entities, for their involvement in narcotics trafficking and money laundering.  A key global cocaine transshipment hub, Costa Rica has become an increasingly significant waypoint for criminal groups trafficking cocaine into the United States.  According to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), cocaine continues to pose a serious threat to the public, causing over 22,000 overdose deaths in the United States in the 12-month period ending in October 2024.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Arias Monge, Alejandro of Cota Rica;
  • Gamboa Sanchez, Celso Manuel of Costa Rica;
  • James Wilson, Alejandro Antonio of Costa Rica; and
  • Lopez Vega, Edwin Danney of Costa Rica.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Bufete Celso Gamboa and Asociados of Costa Rica; and
  • Limon Black Star FC of Costa Rica.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250818 and

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0227

 

*******

August 20, 2025: The United States sanctioned four individuals, currently serving on the International Criminal Court (ICC).  The Department of State’s designations are made pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14203, which authorizes sanctions on foreign persons engaged in certain malign efforts by the ICC and aims to impose tangible and significant consequences on those directly engaged in the ICC’s transgressions against the United States and Israel.

 

The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued International Criminal Court-related General License 9, “Authorizing the Wind Down of Transactions Involving Certain Persons Blocked on August 20, 2025.”

 

GENERAL LICENSE NO. 9: “Authorizing the Wind Down of Transactions Involving Certain Persons  Blocked on August 20, 2025”

 

(a) All transactions prohibited by the International Criminal Court-Related Sanctions Regulations (ICCSR), 31 CFR part 528, that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind down of any transaction involving one or more of the following blocked persons are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, September 19, 2025, provided that any payment to a blocked person is made into a blocked interest-bearing account located in the United States, in accordance with the ICCSR:

 

(1) Nicolas Yann Guillou;

(2) Nazhat Shameem Khan;

(3) Mame Mandiaye Niang;

(4) Kimberly Prost; or

(5) Any entity in which one or more of the above persons own, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Guillou, Nicolas Yann of France;
  • Khan, Nazhat Shameen of Fiji;
  • Niang, Mame Mandiaye of Senegal; and
  • Prost, Kimberly of Canada.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250820

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934581/download?inline

https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2025/08/imposing-further-sanctions-in-response-to-the-iccs-ongoing-threat-to-americans-and-israelis/

 

*******

 

August 21, 2025: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) further disrupted Iran’s oil exports by imposing sanctions on Greek national Antonios Margaritis, his network of companies, and nearly a dozen vessels involved in Iran’s shadow fleet. Margaritis has leveraged his decades of experience in the shipping industry to illicitly facilitate the transportation and sale of Iranian petroleum. Several other vessels and operators are also being designated for their role facilitating Iranian oil exports, which generates revenue that contributes to Iran’s advanced weapons programs.

 

The following individual has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Margatis, Antonios of Greece.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Ares Shipping Limited of China;
  • Comford Management S.A. of the Marshall Islands;
  • Cristobal Marine Corp of the Marshall Islands;
  • Hong Kong Hangshun Shipping Limited of China;
  • Marant Shipping and Trading S.A. of Greece;
  • Ozarka Shipping – FZCO of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Qingdao Port Haiye Dongjiakou Oil of China;
  • Regal Liberty Limited of China;
  • Square Tanker Management Ltd. of the Marshall Islands;
  • U Beacon Shipping Co., Limited of China;
  • United Chartering S.A. of the Marshall Islands; and
  • Yangshan Shengang International Petroleum Storage and Transportation Co., Ltd of China.

 

The following vessels have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Adeline G 3E3513) Crude Oil Tanker Panama flag; MMSI 352002297 (vessel);
  • Ares (E5U3903) Crude Oil Tanker Cook Islands flag; MMSI 518100992 (vessel);
  • Giant (a.k.a. MACHO QUEEN) (VRUF3) Crude Oil Tanker Hong Kong flag; MSI 477722100 (vessel);
  • Katsuya (C5J502) Oil Products Tanker Gambia flag; MMSI 629009490 (vessel);
  • Kongm (3E5132) Crude Oil Tanker Panama flag; MMSI 353529000 (vessel);
  • Lafit (S9A3169) Crude Oil Tanker Sao Tome & Principe flag; MMSI 668116369 (vessel);
  • Sondos (V2YL4) Chemical/Oil Tanker Antigua and Barbuda flag; MMSI 305263000 (vessel); and
  • Victory Ari (V2YR4) Chemical/Oil Tanker Antigua and Barbuda flag; MMSI 305049000 (vessel).

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250821

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0229

 

*******

 

August 25, 2025: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) amended the Syrian Sanctions Regulations to remove them from the Code of Federal Regulations, consistent with Executive Order 14312 of June 30, 2025, “Providing for the Revocation of Syria Sanctions.” This regulatory amendment is currently available for public inspection with the Federal Register and will take effect upon publication in the Federal Register on August 26, 2025.

 

*******

 

August 27, 2025:  The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned Vitaliy Sergeyevich Andreyev, Kim Ung Sun, Shenyang Geumpungri Network Technology Co., Ltd, and Korea Sinjin Trading Corporation for their roles in a fraudulent information technology (IT) worker scheme orchestrated by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) government.

 

The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued Russia-related General License 104A, “Authorizing Transactions Related to Imports of Certain Diamonds Prohibited by Executive Order 14068.”

 

GENERAL LICENSE NO. 104A: “Authorizing Transactions Related to Imports of Certain Diamonds  Prohibited by Executive Order 14068”

 

(a) All transactions prohibited by the determination of February 8, 2024 made pursuant to section 1(a)(i)(B) of Executive Order (E.O.) 14068 (“Prohibitions Related to Imports of Certain Categories of Diamonds”) that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the importation and entry into the United States, including importation for admission into a foreign trade zone located in the United States, of the following categories of diamonds are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, September 1, 2026, provided that the diamonds were physically located outside of the Russian Federation before, and were not exported or re-exported from the Russian Federation since:

 

(1) March 1, 2024 for non-industrial diamonds with a weight of 1.0 carat or greater; or

(2) September 1, 2024 for non-industrial diamonds with a weight of 0.5 carats or greater.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934591/download?inline

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Andreyev, Vitaly Sergeyevich of Russia; and
  • Kim, Ung Sun of North Korea.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Korea Sinjin Trading Corporation of North Korea; and
  • Shenyang Geumpungri Network Technology Co., Ltd of China.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250827

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0230

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934591/download?inline

AUGUST 2025 EXPORT CONTROLS AND COMPLIANCE UPDATES Read More »

JULY 2025 EXPORT CONTROLS AND COMPLIANCE UPDATES

This newsletter is a listing of the latest changes in export control regulations through July 31, 2025.  The newsletter is provided as a complimentary service to assist exporters with their ITAR and EAR export compliance responsibilities. It provides a summary of recent changes to export control regulations or other regulatory matters of interest that may impact your company’s international trade and export compliance functions. Call us at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net with questions or comments.

 

See also our “Latest Sanctions Fines & Penalties” section below for an update on companies and

persons denied export privileges by the United States Government.

 

We have added a specific DDTC FAQs section, we think this will be of interest to our readers.

 

 

REGULATORY UPDATES

 

President

 

PROMOTING THE EXPORT OF THE AMERICAN AI TECHNOLOGY STACK

 

July 23, 2025: By the authority vested in the President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, it is hereby ordered:

 

Section 1.  Purpose.  Artificial intelligence (AI) is a foundational technology that will define the future of economic growth, national security, and global competitiveness for decades to come.  The United States must not only lead in developing general-purpose and frontier AI capabilities, but also ensure that American AI technologies, standards, and governance models are adopted worldwide to strengthen relationships with our allies and secure our continued technological dominance.  This order establishes a coordinated national effort to support the American AI industry by promoting the export of full-stack American AI technology packages.

 

Sec2.  Policy.  It is the policy of the United States to preserve and extend American leadership in AI and decrease international dependence on AI technologies developed by our adversaries by supporting the global deployment of United States-origin AI technologies.

 

Sec3.  Establishment of the American AI Exports Program.  (a)  Within 90 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Commerce shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), establish and implement the American AI Exports Program (Program) to support the development and deployment of United States full-stack AI export packages.

 

(b)  The Secretary of Commerce shall issue a public call for proposals from industry-led consortia for inclusion in the Program.  The public call shall require that each proposal must:

(i)    include a full-stack AI technology package, which encompasses:

 

(A)  AI-optimized computer hardware (e.g., chips, servers, and accelerators), data center storage, cloud services, and networking, as well as a description of whether and to what extent such items are manufactured in the United States;

(B)  data pipelines and labeling systems;

(C)  AI models and systems;

(D)  measures to ensure the security and cybersecurity of AI models and systems; and

(E)  AI applications for specific use cases (e.g., software engineering, education, healthcare, agriculture, or transportation);

 

(ii)   identify specific target countries or regional blocs for export engagement;

(iii)  describe a business and operational model to explain, at a high level, which entities will build, own, and operate data centers and associated infrastructure;

(iv)   detail requested Federal incentives and support mechanisms; and

(v)    comply with all relevant United States export control regimes, outbound investment regulations, and end-user policies, including chapter 58 of title 50, United States Code, and relevant guidance from the Bureau of Industry and Security within the Department of Commerce.

 

(c)  The Department of Commerce shall require proposals to be submitted no later than 90 days after the public call for proposals is issued, and shall consider proposals on a rolling basis for inclusion in the Program.

 

(d)  The Secretary of Commerce shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy, and the Director of OSTP, evaluate submitted proposals for inclusion under the Program.  Proposals selected by the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy, and the Director of OSTP, will be designated as priority AI export packages and will be supported through priority access to the tools identified in section 4 of this order, as consistent with applicable law.

 

Sec4.  Mobilization of Federal Financing Tools.  (a)  The Economic Diplomacy Action Group (EDAG), established in the Presidential Memorandum of June 21, 2024, chaired by the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce and the United States Trade Representative, and as described in section 708 of the Championing American Business Through Diplomacy Act of 2019 (Title VII of Division J of Public Law 116-94) (CABDA), shall coordinate mobilization of Federal financing tools in support of priority AI export packages.

 

(b)  I delegate to the Administrator of the Small Business Administration and the Director of OSTP the authority under section 708(c)(3) of CABDA to appoint senior officials from their respective executive departments and agencies to serve as members of the EDAG.

 

(c)  The Secretary of State, in consultation with the EDAG, shall be responsible for:

(i)    developing and executing a unified Federal Government strategy to promote the export of American AI technologies and standards;

(ii)   aligning technical, financial, and diplomatic resources to accelerate deployment of priority AI export packages under the Program;

(iii)  coordinating United States participation in multilateral initiatives and country-specific partnerships for AI deployment and export promotion;

(iv)   supporting partner countries in fostering pro‑innovation regulatory, data, and infrastructure environments conducive to the deployment of American AI systems;

(v)    analyzing market access, including technical barriers to trade and regulatory measures that may impede the competitiveness of United States offerings; and

(vi)   coordinating with the Small Business Administration’s Office of Investment and Innovation to facilitate, to the extent permitted under applicable law, investment in United States small businesses to the development of American AI technologies and the manufacture of AI infrastructure, hardware, and systems.

 

(d)  Members of the EDAG shall deploy, to the maximum extent permitted by law, available Federal tools to support the priority export packages selected for participation in the Program, including direct loans and loan guarantees (12  U.S.C. 635); equity investments, co-financing, political risk insurance, and credit guarantees (22  U.S.C. 9621); and technical assistance and feasibility studies (22 U.S.C. 2421(b)).

 

Sec5.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

 

(i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

 

(ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

 

(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

 

(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

 

(d)  The costs for publication of this order shall be borne by the Department of Commerce.

 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/07/promoting-the-export-of-the-american-ai-technology-stack/

*******

 

SUSPENDING DUTY-FREE DE MINIMIS TREATMENT FOR ALL COUNTRIES

 

July 30, 2025: By the authority vested in the President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), section 604 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2483), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, it is hereby ordered:

 

Section 1.  Background.  In Executive Order 14193 of February 1, 2025 (Imposing Duties To Address the Flow of Illicit Drugs Across Our Northern Border), I declared a national emergency regarding the unusual and extraordinary threat to the safety and security of Americans, including the public health crisis caused by fentanyl and other illicit drugs and the failure of Canada to do more to arrest, seize, detain, or otherwise intercept drug trafficking organizations, other drug and human traffickers, criminals at large, and illicit drugs.  In that order, I determined that it was necessary and appropriate to, among other things, suspend duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) for articles described in section 2(a) and section 2(b) of that order.  In Executive Order 14226 of March 2, 2025 (Amendment to Duties To Address the Flow of Illicit Drugs Across Our Northern Border), I paused the suspension of duty-free de minimis treatment on such articles until I received a notification from the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) that adequate systems are in place to fully and expeditiously process and collect duties for such articles that would otherwise be eligible for duty-free de minimis treatment.

 

In Executive Order 14194 of February 1, 2025 (Imposing Duties To Address the Situation at Our Southern Border), I declared a national emergency regarding the unusual and extraordinary threat to the safety and security of Americans, including the public health crisis caused by fentanyl and other illicit drugs and the failure of Mexico to do more to arrest, seize, detain, or otherwise intercept drug trafficking organizations, other drug and human traffickers, criminals at large, and illicit drugs.  In that order, I determined that it was necessary and appropriate to, among other things, suspend duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) for articles described in section 2(a) of that order.  In Executive Order 14227 of March 2, 2025 (Amendment to Duties To Address the Situation at Our Southern Border), I paused the suspension of duty-free de minimis treatment on such articles until I received a notification from the Secretary that adequate systems are in place to fully and expeditiously process and collect duties for such articles that would otherwise be eligible for duty-free de minimis treatment.

 

In Executive Order 14195 of February 1, 2025 (Imposing Duties To Address the Synthetic Opioid Supply Chain in the People’s Republic of China), I declared a national emergency regarding the unusual and extraordinary threat from the failure of the Government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to arrest, seize, detain, or otherwise intercept chemical precursor suppliers, money launderers, other transnational criminal organizations, criminals at large, and illicit drugs.  In that order, I determined that it was necessary and appropriate to, among other things, suspend duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) for articles described in section 2(a) of that order.  In Executive Order 14200 of February 5, 2025 (Amendment to Duties Addressing the Synthetic Opioid Supply Chain in the People’s Republic of China), I paused the suspension of duty-free de minimis treatment for articles described in section 2(a) of Executive Order 14195 until I received a notification from the Secretary that adequate systems are in place to fully and expeditiously process and collect duties for such articles that would otherwise be eligible for duty-free de minimis treatment.

 

The President subsequently received notification from the Secretary that adequate systems have been established to process and collect duties for articles of the PRC and Hong Kong that would otherwise be eligible for duty-free de minimis treatment, and in Executive Order 14256 of April 2, 2025 (Further Amendment to Duties Addressing the Synthetic Opioid Supply Chain in the People’s Republic of China as Applied to Low-Value Imports), I suspended duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) for products of the PRC and Hong Kong described in section 2(a) of Executive Order 14195, as amended by Executive Order 14228 (Further Amendment to Duties Addressing the Synthetic Opioid Supply Chain in the People’s Republic of China).  In addition, I instructed the Secretary to submit a report regarding the impact of Executive Order 14256 on American industries, consumers, and supply chains and to make recommendations for further action as he deems necessary.

 

In Executive Order 14257 of April 2, 2025 (Regulating Imports With a Reciprocal Tariff To Rectify Trade Practices That Contribute to Large and Persistent Annual United States Goods Trade Deficits), I declared a national emergency with respect to underlying conditions indicated by the large and persistent annual U.S. goods trade deficits.  I also provided that duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) would remain available for products described in section 3(a) of that order until I received a notification by the Secretary that adequate systems are in place to fully and expeditiously process and collect duties applicable for articles otherwise eligible for duty-free de minimis treatment.

 

The Secretary has notified me that adequate systems are now in place to fully and expeditiously process and collect duties for articles otherwise eligible for duty-free de minimis treatment on a global basis, including for products described in section 2(a) and section 2(b) of Executive Order 14193, section 2(a) of Executive Order 14194, and section 3(a) of Executive Order 14257.

The President determines that it is still necessary and appropriate to suspend duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) in the manner and for the articles described below to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threats, which have their source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States.

 

The President determines that it is necessary and appropriate to suspend duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) for certain Canadian goods to deal with the emergency declared in Executive Order 14193, as amended.  In my judgment, this suspension is necessary and appropriate to ensure that the tariffs imposed by Executive Order 14193, as amended, are effective in addressing the emergency declared in Executive Order 14193 and that the purpose of this action and other actions to address the emergency declared in Executive Order 14193 is not undermined.  For example, many shippers go to great lengths to evade law enforcement and hide illicit substances in imports that go through international commerce.  These shippers conceal the true contents of shipments sent to the United States through deceptive shipping practices.  Some of the techniques employed by these shippers to conceal the true contents of the shipments, the identity of the distributors, and the country of origin of the imports include the use of re-shippers in the United States, false invoices, fraudulent postage, and deceptive packaging.  The risks of evasion, deception, and illicit-drug importation are particularly high for low-value articles that have been eligible for duty-free de minimis treatment.

 

The President determines that it is necessary and appropriate to suspend duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) for certain Mexican goods to deal with the emergency declared in Executive Order 14194, as amended.  In my judgment, and for substantially similar reasons as above, this suspension is necessary and appropriate to ensure that the tariffs imposed by Executive Order 14194, as amended, are effective in addressing the emergency declared in Executive Order 14194 and that the purpose of this action and other actions to address the emergency declared in Executive Order 14194 is not undermined.

 

Independently, and after considering information newly provided by the Secretary, among other things, the President determines that it is still necessary and appropriate to continue to suspend duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) for certain goods of the PRC and Hong Kong to deal with the emergency declared in Executive Order 14195, as amended.  In my judgment, and for substantially similar reasons as above, this suspension is still necessary and appropriate to ensure that the tariffs imposed by Executive Order 14195, as amended, are effective in addressing the emergency declared in Executive Order 14195 and that the purpose of this action and other actions to address the emergency declared in Executive Order 14195 is not undermined.

 

Also independently, The President determines that it is necessary and appropriate to suspend duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) on a global basis to deal with the emergency declared in Executive Order 14257, as amended.  In my judgment, this suspension is necessary and appropriate to ensure that the tariffs imposed by Executive Order 14257, as amended, are not evaded and are effective in addressing the emergency declared in Executive Order 14257 and that the purpose of this action and other actions to address the emergency declared in Executive Order 14257 is not undermined.

 

Each of the Presidents determinations to suspend or continue to suspend duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) are independent from the other.  And each determination is made only for the purpose to deal with the respective emergency and not for the purpose of dealing with another emergency.

 

Sec2.  Suspension of Duty-Free de minimis Treatment.  (a)  The duty-free de minimis exemption provided under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) shall no longer apply to any shipment of articles not covered by 50 U.S.C. 1702(b), regardless of value, country of origin, mode of transportation, or method of entry.  Accordingly, all such shipments, except those sent through the international postal network, shall be subject to all applicable duties, taxes, fees, exactions, and charges.  International postal shipments not covered by 50 U.S.C. 1702(b) shall be subject to the duty rates described in section 3 of this order.  Entry for all shipments that — prior to the effective date of this order — qualified for the de minimis exemption, except for shipments sent through the international postal network, shall be filed using an appropriate entry type in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) by a party qualified to make such entry.

 

(b)  Shipments sent through the international postal network that would otherwise qualify for the de minimis exemption under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) shall pass free of any duties except those specified in section 3 of this order, and without the preparation of an entry by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), until such time as CBP establishes a new entry process and publishes that process in the Federal Register.

 

Sec3.  Duty Rates for International Postal Shipments.  (a)  Transportation carriers delivering shipments to the United States through the international postal network, or other parties if qualified in lieu of such transportation carriers, must collect and remit duties to CBP using the methodology described in either subsection (b) or (c) of this section.  Each transportation carrier shall apply the same methodology across all covered shipments during any given period but may change its methodology no more than once per calendar month, or on another schedule determined to be appropriate by CBP, upon providing at least 24 hours’ notice to CBP.

 

(b)  A duty equal to the effective IEEPA tariff rate applicable to the country of origin of the product shall be assessed on the value of each dutiable postal item (package) containing goods entered for consumption.

(c)  A specific duty shall be assessed on each package containing goods entered for consumption, based on the effective IEEPA tariff rate applicable to the country of origin of the product as follows:

(i)    Countries with an effective IEEPA tariff rate of less than 16 percent:  $80 per item;

(ii)   Countries with an effective IEEPA tariff rate between 16 and 25 percent (inclusive):  $160 per item; and

(iii)  Countries with an effective IEEPA rate above 25 percent:  $200 per item.

(d)  For all international postal shipments subject to the methodologies described in subsections (b) and (c) of this section, the country of origin of the article must be declared to CBP.

(e)  The specific duty methodology provided for in subsection (c) of this section shall be available for transportation carriers to select for a period of 6 months from the effective date of this order.  After such time all shipments to the United States through the international postal network must comply with the ad valorem duty methodology in subsection (b) of this section.

(f)  Shipments sent through the international postal network that are subject to antidumping and countervailing duties or a quota must continue to be entered under an appropriate entry type in ACE to the extent required by all applicable regulations.

 

Sec4.  Implementation.  (a)  The requirements and procedures established by sections 2 and 3 of this order shall be effective with respect to goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on August 29, 2025.

 

(b)  The provisions of this order supersede section 2 of Executive Order 14256, as amended, with respect to goods entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on August 29, 2025.

 

(c)  Consistent with applicable law, the Secretary of Homeland Security is directed and authorized to take all necessary actions to implement and effectuate this order — including through temporary suspension or amendment of regulations or through notices in the Federal Register and by adopting rules, regulations, or guidance — and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to implement and effectuate this order.  The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the United States International Trade Commission (ITC), shall determine whether modifications to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States are necessary to effectuate this order and may make such modifications through notice in the Federal Register.  The Secretary of Homeland Security shall consult with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Commerce, the United States Trade Representative, the ITC, and the Postmaster General, where appropriate.  The Secretary of Homeland Security may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions within the Department of Homeland Security.  All executive departments and agencies shall take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement this order.

 

(d)  To ensure remittance of duties in accordance with this order, and to assure compliance with other legal requirements, CBP is authorized to require a basic importation and entry bond as described in 19 C.F.R. 113.62 for informal entries valued at or less than $2,500.  Any carrier that transports international postal shipments to the United States, by any mode of transportation, must have an international carrier bond as described in 19 C.F.R. 113.64 to ensure payment of the duties described in section 3 of this order.  CBP is authorized to ensure that the international carrier bonds required by this subsection are sufficient to account for the duties described in section 3 of this order.

 

Sec5.  Definition.  As used in this order, the term “effective IEEPA tariff rate” means the total duty rate imposed on articles to address a national emergency declared under IEEPA, including Executive Order 14257, as amended; Executive Order 14193; as amended, Executive Order 14194, as amended; and Executive Order 14195, as amended, in accordance with the stacking rules set out in Executive Order 14289 of April 29, 2025 (Addressing Certain Tariffs on Imported Articles), and any subsequent order or proclamation addressing stacking or the applicability of tariffs imposed under IEEPA.

 

Sec6.  Severability.  (a)  If any provision of this order or the application of any provision of this order to any individual or circumstance is held to be invalid, the remainder of this order and the application of its provisions to any other individuals or circumstances shall not be affected.

 

(b)(i)  If the additional duties imposed under Executive Order 14193, as amended, Executive Order 14194, as amended, Executive Order 14195, as amended, or Executive Order 14257, as amended, are held to be invalid, the suspension of, or continued suspension of, duty-free de minimis treatment, as detailed in this order, shall not be affected.  Duty-free de minimis treatment would still be suspended, whether pursuant to my authority under 50 U.S.C. 1702(a)(1)(B) to “regulate . . . importation” or my authority under that provision to “nullify” or “void” “exercising any right . . . or privilege with respect to . . . any property,” in the way and to the extent explained in this order, to deal with the emergencies declared in Executive Order 14193, as amended, Executive Order 14194, as amended, Executive Order 14195, as amended, or Executive Order 14257, as amended.  Such suspensions are still necessary and appropriate to address the unusual and extraordinary threats to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States.  Each determination to suspend or continue to suspend duty-free de minimis treatment is still independent from the other determination and made only with the purpose to deal with the respective emergency and not for the purpose of dealing with another emergency.  CBP is directed and authorized to take all necessary actions consistent with applicable law to implement and effectuate this order in line with this section ‑- including through temporary suspension or amendment of regulations or through notices in the Federal Register and by adopting rules, regulations, or guidance — and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to implement and effectuate this order in line with this section.

 

(ii)  Duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) shall remain available for postal shipments until notification by the Secretary to the President that adequate systems are in place to fully and expeditiously process and collect duties applicable for postal shipments otherwise eligible for duty-free de minimis treatment.  After such notification, duty-free de minimis treatment under 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C) shall not be available for postal shipments.

 

Sec7.  General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i)   the authority granted by law to an executive

department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

(d)  The costs for publication of this order shall be borne by the Department of Homeland Security.

 

 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/07/suspending-duty-free-de-minimis-treatment-for-all-countries/

 

*******

 

 

Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC)

 

International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Updates to § 126.1 Country Policies and Minor Revisions

 

July 7, 2025: 90 Fed. Reg. 29720: DDTC has published a final rule in the Federal Register updating the International Traffic in Arms Regulations’ (ITAR) § 126.1 country policies for the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Haiti, Libya, Somalia, South Sudan, and Sudan. These updates codify in the ITAR recent United Nations Security Council resolutions. The Department is also making several clarifications and corrections in the ITAR, including updates to the list of North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members and major non-NATO allies, as well as revising ITAR § 126.1(a) to improve its readability.

 

The changes are summarized as follows:

 

(1) Removing a requirement to pre-notify the DRC Sanctions Committee of shipments of arms and related materiel to the government of the Democratic Republic of the Congo;

(2) Permitting case-by-case consideration of exports to Haiti of (a) defense articles and services that have been pre-approved by the UN Security Council Haiti Sanctions Committee and (b) non-lethal military equipment only for humanitarian or protective use and related technical assistance or training;

(3) Implementing revisions of the UN arms embargo on Libya, including permitting specified exports and temporary exports;

(4) Implementing a Dec. 1, 2023, UNSC resolution formally lifting the prior nationwide arms embargo on Somalia;

(5) Implementing a July 30, 2024, UNSC resolution easing the arms embargo on the Central African Republic;

(6) Removing a provision that had allowed for a case-by-case review of export licenses or other approvals involving help and supplies in support of implementation of a peace agreement in Sudan;

(7) Implementing UNSC resolutions regarding the arms embargo on South Sudan;

(8) Updating the list of North Atlantic Treaty Organization members to add Finland and Sweden; and

(9) Updating the list of major non-NATO allies by adding Colombia, Kenya, and Qatar and removing Afghanistan.

 

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_public_portal_news_and_events and

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/sys_attachment.do?sys_id=ebdaa39697ea6a5067b1791ad053af05

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/07/07/2025-12560/international-traffic-in-arms-regulations-updates-to-certain-proscribed-countries-and-other-changes

 

*******

 

ITAR Updates to Certain Proscribed Countries and Other Changes – Affected Sections Redline and Updated ITAR Reorg Redline

 

July 8, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 29720: On July 7, 2025, the Department published a final rule (90 FR 29720) amending ITAR sections 120.23, 120.54, and 126.1.  To assist users of the ITAR, the Department provides here a redline of sections affected by that rule and a link to the updated ITAR Reorg redline.

 

DDTC provides these redlines as a service to the public but notes that it is not intended to be a substitute for any official publication of the U.S. Government.  We direct your attention to the annual edition of the Code of Federal Regulations and to the e-CFR system for the actual regulatory text.

 

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/sys_attachment.do?sys_id=8f89a87e9722629067b1791ad053afc1

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/sys_attachment.do?sys_id=c6090afa97b266100083b3b0f053af2c

 

*******

Updating Cuba Restricted List

 

July 14, 2025: 90. Fed. Reg. 31558: The Department of State added seven Cuban military-controlled hotels to the List of Restricted Entities and Sub entities Associated With Cuba (Cuba Restricted List or CRL) identifying entities and sub entities under the control of, or acting for or on behalf of, the Cuban military, intelligence, or security services or personnel with which direct financial transactions would disproportionately benefit such services or personnel at the expense of the Cuban people or private enterprise in Cuba. The Cuban Assets Control Regulations generally prohibit a person subject to U.S. jurisdiction from having direct financial transactions with the entities and sub entities on the CRL. The Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security generally will deny applications to export or reexport items for use by entities or sub entities on the CRL.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/07/14/2025-13149/updating-cuba-restricted-list

 

*******

 

DDTC Name And Address Changes Posted To Website

 

July 2 through July 14, 2025: The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) posted the following name and/or address changes on its website at    

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_kb_article_page&sys_id=bd72ca0adbf8d30044f9ff621f961981:

  • Change in Address of Saab AB (publ), Business Area Surveillance from Nettovagen 6, SE-175 88 Jarfalla, Sweden to Solna strandvag 10, SE 171 54 Solna, Sweden;
  • Change in Name of Piaggio Aero Industries S.p.A to Baykar Aerospace S.p.A due to acquisition;
  • Change in Name of Bollore Logistics SE to CEVA Air & Ocean International SE due to acquisition;
  • Change in Name of Econocom Workplace Infra Innovation to Econocom Services & Solutions due to corporate restructuring;
  • Change in Name of ATLAS ELEKTRONIK UK Limited to TKMS ATLAS UK Limited due to merger.

 

*******

 

DDTC Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

 

Q: Are individuals who are recipients of grants issued in accordance with the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy of the United States Government considered U.S. persons under the ITAR?

 

A: No, individuals granted DACA status do not fall withing the ITAR definition of a U.S. person (ITAR § 120.62) by virtue of the issuance of their DACA status. Issuance of an employment authorization document by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to such recipients does not mean that an individual is a lawful permanent resident or a protected individual as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(2) or 8 U.S.C. § 1324b(a)(3).

 

Q: Is a U.S. person who is also a citizen of another country a U.S. person, a foreign person, or both?

 

A: Under the ITAR, a person is either a U.S. person or a foreign person. If a person meets the definition of a U.S. person at ITAR § 120.62, by definition they are not a foreign person as defined in ITAR § 120.63. This means that a U.S. person who is a citizen of a foreign country (e.g., a lawful U.S. permanent resident who is not a U.S. citizen) is a U.S. person and not a foreign person.  Similarly, a U.S. person who is a U.S. citizen and also holds the citizenship of another country is a U.S. person and not a foreign person.

 

Q: When is a foreign person considered an employee?

 

A: A foreign person is considered an employee when the foreign person is a full time regular employee, directly paid, insured, hired/fired and/or promoted exclusively by the U.S. person. The employee, however, need not LIVE in the U.S. to be employed by the U.S. person. The U.S. person is liable to ensure all foreign person employees are compliant with U.S. export laws regardless of residence.

 

Q: Should freight forwarders be identified on agreements (TAAs, MLAs, WDAs)?

 

A: Freight forwarders should not be identified in agreement submissions. Freight forwarders should only be identified in licenses in furtherance of (IFO) an agreement. See the DDTC Agreement Guidelines when utilizing the § 123.16(b) exemption regarding how to identify freight forwarders.

 

Q: On what type of export authorization from DDTC should the Applicant identify foreign freight forwarders that will move hardware from a foreign signatory of a Warehousing and Distribution Agreement (WDA) to an authorized end user in the Distribution Territory of that WDA?

 

A: The foreign freight forwarders should be identified on the DSP-5 in furtherance of the WDA for the original export of the hardware from a U.S. signatory to a foreign signatory of the WDA.  Alternatively, such foreign freight forwarders can be included as sublicensees to the WDA. Lastly, a foreign signatory to the WDA may obtain retransfer/reexport authorization from DDTC to identify the foreign freight forwarders that transport the hardware to the authorized end user in the Distribution Territory of the WDA.

 

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA)

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Lebanon

 

July 11, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Lebanon has requested to buy support equipment, and other related elements of logistics program and support that will be added to a previously implemented case whose value was under the congressional notification threshold. The original Foreign Military Sales (FMS) case, valued at $43.7 million ($0 in MDE), included Cartridge Actuated Devices and Propellent Actuated Devices (CAD/PADs); engine components, parts, and accessories; aircraft engine and ground handling equipment; major and minor modifications; aircraft components, spares, and accessories; spare parts, consumables, and accessories, and repair and return support; unclassified software delivery and support; unclassified publications and technical documentation; clothing, textiles, and individual equipment; transportation support; U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics support services; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $100 million.
The principal contractor will be Sierra Nevada Corporation (SNC), located in Sparks, NV. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4241763/lebanon-a-29-super-tucano-aircraft-sustainment

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Norway

 

July 11, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Norway has requested to buy up to nine (9) HH-60W helicopters; twenty-two (22) T-700-GE-401 turboshaft engines; twenty-one (21) Embedded Global Positioning System/Inertial Navigation Systems (GPS/INS) (EGI) (18 installed, 3 spares); ten (10) AN/APR-52 Radar Warning Receivers (RWR) (9 installed, 1 spare); and ten (10) AN/AAR-57 Common Missile Warning Systems (CMWS) (9 installed, 1 spare). The following non-MDE items will also be included: GAU-21 aircraft machine guns and other machine guns; IZLID 200P infrared lasers; AN/ALE-47 Airborne Countermeasures Dispenser Systems; Joint Mission Planning System with unique planning components and software; Computer Program Identification Numbers (CPINs); weapons and weapons support equipment; major and minor modifications and maintenance support; instruments and lab equipment; training aids, devices, and spare parts; consumables, accessories, and repair and return support; electronic warfare database support; classified and unclassified software delivery and support; classified and unclassified publications and technical documentation; personnel training and training equipment; aircraft ferry and transportation support; facilities and construction support; studies and surveys; U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics support services; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $2.6 billion. The principal contractor will be Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, located in Stratford, CT. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor. Implementation of this proposed sale will not require the assignment of any additional U.S. Government or contractor representatives to Norway.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4241742/norway-hh-60w-helicopters

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Bulgaria

 

July 21, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Bulgaria has requested to buy a Naval Strike Missile Coastal Defense System (NSM CDS), including three (3) Link-16 Multifunctional Information Distribution System – Joint Tactical Radio Systems (MIDS-JTRS) and the following non-MDE items: tactical Naval Strike Missiles (NSM); inert NSM handling; telemetered NSM; operational, inert NSM; mobile fire control centers with associated communications equipment; mobile missile launch vehicles with associated communications equipment; NSM transport loading vehicles; NavStrike-M Global Positioning System receiver; operator trainer consoles; Simple Key Loaders (SKL); and associated support including but not limited to technical publications, training documentation, technical data packages, support equipment, software support spare parts, training, training simulators, integration services, and U.S. government and original equipment manufacturer technical assistance; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $620 million. The principal contractor will be Kongsberg Defence and Aerospace AS, located in Kongsberg, Norway. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4250841/bulgaria-naval-strike-missile-coastal-defense-system

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Ukraine

 

July 23, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Ukraine has requested to buy sustainment related articles and services for the HAWK missile system, including: five-ton cargo trucks; HAWK system spare parts; refurbishment and system overhaul of HAWK air defense fire units; tool kits; test equipment; support equipment; technical documentation; training; U.S. Government and contractor technical and field office support; U.S. Government and contractor technical assistance; storage containers and equipment related to spare parts storage; MIM-23 HAWK missile spare parts and missile repair; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total program cost is $172 million. The principal contractors will be Sielman Corporation, located in Volos, Greece; RTX Corporation, located in Andover, MA; and PROJECTXYZ, located in Huntsville, AL. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4253428/ukraine-hawk-phase-iii-missile-system-and-sustainment

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Ukraine

 

July 23, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Ukraine has requested to buy equipment and services for the refurbishment of Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicles, technical assistance, training, publications, and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $150 million. The principal contractors will be BAE Systems, Cummins Inc., Leonardo DRS Inc., and Renk Group AG, with all work occurring in Europe. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4253473/ukraine-bradley-infantry-fighting-vehicles-and-maintenance-repair-and-overhaul

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Ukraine

 

July 24, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Ukraine has requested to buy equipment and services to support the training, sustainment, and refurbishment measures of existing U.S.-origin air defense systems. The following non-MDE items will be included: major modifications and maintenance support; spare parts, consumables and accessories, and repair and return support; personnel training and training equipment; U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics support services; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $180 million. The principal contractors will be Sierra Nevada Corporation, located in Sparks, NV; V2X, Inc., located in McLean, VA; Radionix, located in Kyiv, Ukraine; and Systems Electronic Export, located in Kyiv, Ukraine.  At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4254530/ukraine-air-defense-sustainment

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Ukraine

 

July 24, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Ukraine has requested to buy equipment and services for the refurbishment of M109 self-propelled howitzers, technical assistance, training, publications, and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $150 million. The principal contractors will be BAE Systems, Daimler Truck North America, and Allison Transmission Inc., with all work occurring in Europe. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4254520/ukraine-m109-self-propelled-howitzer-maintenance-repair-and-overhaul-capability

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Egypt

 

July 24, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Egypt has requested to buy the National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System (NASAMS), that includes: four (4) AN/MPQ-64F1 Sentinel radar systems with associated support equipment; one hundred (100) Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM)-Extended Range (ER); one hundred (100) Air Intercept Missile (AIM)-120C-8 AMRAAMs; two (2) AIM-120C-8 AMRAAM guidance sections (spares); one (1) AMRAAM control section (spare); six hundred (600) AIM-9X Sidewinder Block II tactical missiles; one hundred fifty (150) AIM-9X Sidewinder Captive Air Training Missiles (CATMs); sixty-two (62) AIM-9X Sidewinder Block II tactical guidance units (GUs); and twenty (20) AIM-9X Sidewinder CATM GUs. The following non-MDE items will also be included: fire distribution centers (FDC); canister launcher systems; electrooptical/infrared systems; Tactical Control Center systems; NASAMS classroom trainer; communication node systems; IPS 250X High Assurance Internet Protocol Encryptions (HAIPE); Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) Model 5800 or TPX-61; KIV-77 IFF crypto appliqué; AN/PSN-13 Defense Advanced Global Positioning System Receivers (DAGRs) with Selective Availability Anti-Spoofing Module (SAASM); AN/PYQ-10 Simple Key Loaders (SKLs), code loaders, and cable sets; AMRAAM-ER Extended Load Trainers (ELTs); missile containers; weapon system support and test equipment; spare and repair parts, consumables, accessories, and repair and return support; publications and technical documentation; personnel training and training equipment; U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics support services; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $4.67 billion. The prime contractor will be RTX Corporation, located in Andover, MA. There are no known offset agreements proposed in connection with this potential sale.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4254503/egypt-national-advanced-surface-to-air-missile-system

*******

 

U.S. Census Bureau

Schedule B and Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) Updated in the Automated Export System (AES)

July 2, 2025:

Effective immediately, the Schedule B, Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS), and HTS Codes That Are Not Valid for AES tables have been updated to accept the changes to the July 1, 2025 codes.

AES will accept shipments with outdated codes during a grace period for 30 days beyond the expiration date of June 30, 2025Reporting an outdated code after the 30-day grace period will result in a fatal error.

The ACE AESDirect program has been updated with the 2025 codes and will accept shipments with outdated codes during the grace period as well.

The 2025 Schedule B and HTS tables are available for downloading at:

https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/aes/concordance.html

The current list of HTS codes that are not valid for AES are available at:

https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/aes/documentlibrary/concordance/hts-not-for-aes.txt

*******

Update to Automated Export System (AES) Response Message 15A

July 2, 2025:

CSMS # 65520566 - Update to Automated Export System (AES) Response Message 15A

This message is a follow-up to the broadcast released on May 11, 2022, titled Expansion of Foreign Trade Zone Identifier to 9-characters (Effective May 17, 2022).

The severity of Response Message 15A is being upgraded from “Compliance” to a severity of “Fatal” July 14, 2025. This is to ensure further compliance with the changes outlined in Federal Register Notice 85 FR 60479 that requires the expansion of the Foreign Trade Zone Identifier from 7 to 9-characters. This change is effective immediately in CERT for testing.

Response Code: 15A

Narrative Text: FTZ MUST BE 9 CHARACTERS ALPHANUMERIC

Severity: FATAL

Reason: The Foreign Trade Zone Indicator reported on the SC2 record does not have the required format of 3 numeric characters which is a valid zone followed by 6 alphanumeric characters.

Resolution: The Foreign Trade Zone Indicator must be specified in the required format. The first 3 positions must be numeric and represent the general purpose zone. The next 3 positions are alphanumeric and represent the subzone. The last 3 positions are alphanumeric and represent the site. The Foreign Trade Zone Indicator must be left justified with no trailing spaces. Insert zeros when there is no sub zone or site. Report leading zero(s) when the general purpose zone is less than 3 numerics, and when the subzone or site is 1 alphanumeric. Verify the Foreign Trade Zone Indicator, correct the SC2 record and retransmit.

Contact your assigned CBP Client Representative for programming and testing questions.

*******

How to Resolve Common AES Response Messages


July 15, 2025:

 

When submitting your Electronic Export Information (EEI) to the Automated Export System (AES), you can receive different response messages: Fatal, Compliance, Verify, Informational and Warning.  It is important that AES filers address and/or correct Response Messages as soon as they are received to comply with the Foreign Trade Regulations

To help you take the appropriate action, here is guidance on how to address one of the most frequent Response Messages that were generated in the AES for the previous month.

 

Response Code:  628

 

Narrative:     1st Unit of Measure Code / Schedule B/HTS Mismatch

Severity:       Fatal

Reason:        The Unit of Measure (1) reported does not match the Unit of Measure (1) required for the Schedule B/ HTS Number reported.

Resolution: The Unit of Measure (1) must match exactly the Unit of Measure (1) prescribed by the Schedule B/HTS Number reported.  See Appendix K – Units of Measure Codes   

Verify the Unit of Measure (1) required for the reported Schedule B/HTS Number, correct the shipment and resubmit.

For a complete list of the AES Response Codes, their reasons and resolutions, see Appendix A – Commodity Filing Response Messages.

 

*******

 

LATEST SANCTIONS FINES & PENALTIES

 

This section of our newsletter provides information on the latest sanctions, fines and penalties for export violations or matters of non-compliance with the ITAR or EAR issued by the US government enforcement agencies. It is provided as a service to exporters and associates of FD Associates to remind them of the importance of extreme due diligence in all international trade and export compliance matters, particularly those involving exports subject to the ITAR or the EAR. Don't let this happen to you or your company! Call us with questions or concerns at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net.

 

Fines and Penalties

 

Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

 

July 2, 2025: The Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce has notified Unicat Catalyst Technologies, LLC, of Alvin, Texas, as successor to Unicat Catalyst Technologies, Inc., (“Unicat”), of its intention to initiate an administrative proceeding against Unicat pursuant to Section 766.3 of the Export Administration Regulations (the “Regulations”), through the issuance of a Proposed Charging Letter to Unicat that alleges that Unicat committed three violations of the Regulations.

 

https://media.bis.gov/news-updates

https://media.bis.gov/media/1635

 

*******

July 21, 2025: Brian Assi, also known as Brahim Assi, 63, of Beirut, Lebanon, was sentenced to 44 months in prison for conspiring to violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations (ITSR), attempted unlawful export of goods from the United States to Iran without a license, attempted smuggling goods from the United States, submitting false or misleading export information, and conspiracy to commit money laundering.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/foreign-national-sentenced-conspiring-export-us-made-drill-rigs-iran-violation-us-sanctions

 

*******

 

July 21, 2025: José Adolfo Macías Villamar, also known as “Fito,” a citizen of Ecuador, was arraigned at the federal courthouse in Brooklyn for crimes committed as the leader of Los Choneros, a transnational criminal organization based in Ecuador that is responsible for significant drug trafficking into the United States, firearms trafficking from the United States, and acts of extreme violence.  Macías Villamar was arraigned on a seven-count superseding indictment charging him with international cocaine distribution conspiracy; international cocaine distribution; using firearms in furtherance of drug trafficking; smuggling firearms from the United States; and straw purchasing of firearms conspiracy.  Macías Villamar will be arraigned before United States Chief Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon after being extradited from Ecuador to the Eastern District of New York.

 

https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/jose-adolfo-fito-macias-villamar-leader-los-choneros-transnational-criminal-0

https://media.bis.gov/news-updates

 

*******

 

July 28, 2025: The Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) imposed an administrative penalty of $95 million against Cadence Design Systems Inc. (Cadence) for illegal exports of Electronic Design Automation (EDA) hardware and software and semiconductor design technology to parties on the Entity List, an export controls blacklist.  This is in addition to a concurrent agreement that Cadence signed with the U.S. Department of Justice which includes $45 million in forfeitures.

 

In a settlement agreement with BIS, Cadence admitted that employees of its Chinese subsidiary knowingly transferred sensitive U.S. technology to entities that develop supercomputers in support of China’s military modernization and nuclear weapons programs namely the National University of Defense Technology (NUDT), Tianjin Phytium Information Technology (Phytium), and other Entity List parties.

 

Under the terms of the BIS settlement agreement, Cadence admitted to 56 violations of the EAR between September 2015 and September 2020, for selling EDA products to NUDT through an alias, Central South CAD Center (CSCC). Cadence exported EDA hardware and software, and semiconductor design technology, valued at $45,305,317.41 to CSCC with knowledge or reason to know that NUDT would be the end-user. Cadence maintained a sales relationship with NUDT for years after NUDT’s placement on the Entity List using an account assigned to CSCC and had reason to know CSCC was closely linked to NUDT, including that equipment sold or loaned to CSCC was installed on the NUDT campus and that CSCC and NUDT shared personnel.

 

https://media.bis.gov/press-release/cadence-design-systems-pay-95-million-penalty-bis-unauthorized-exports-chinese-entities-tied-development

https://bis.gov/media/documents/cadence-design-systems-final-order-7.28.2025.pdf

 

*******

 

 

Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

 

July 2, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced a $608,825 settlement with Key Holding, LLC. Key Holding agreed to settle its potential civil liability for 36 apparent violations of OFAC sanctions on Cuba that arose from the conduct of a Key Holding subsidiary in Colombia that managed the logistics for freight shipments to Cuba. The settlement amount reflects OFAC's determination that the apparent violations were non-egregious and voluntarily self-disclosed. For more information, please see the following Enforcement Release.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250702

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934456/download?inline

 

*******

 

July 8, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced a $1,454,145 settlement with Harman International Industries, Inc. Harman agreed to settle its potential civil liability for 11 apparent violations of OFAC sanctions on Iran. Over a period of more than two years, overseas employees of a U.S. subsidiary of Harman enabled the diversion of its products from its United Arab Emirates distributor to Iran. The settlement amount reflects OFAC's determination that the apparent violations were egregious and voluntarily self-disclosed. For more information, please see the following Enforcement Release and settlement agreement.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934471/download?inline and

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934476/download?inline

 

*******

 

July 15, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced an $11,832,136 settlement with Interactive Brokers LLC (IB). IB agreed to settle its potential civil liability for apparent violations of several OFAC sanctions programs that arose from IB’s provision of brokerage and investment services to persons in Iran, Cuba, Syria, and the Crimea region of Ukraine, processing of trades in securities subject to the Chinese Military-Industrial Complex program, processing of transactions involving blocked persons under OFAC’s Russia, Global Magnitsky, Venezuela, and Syria sanctions programs, and engagement in new investment in the Russian Federation. OFAC determined IB’s conduct was non-egregious and voluntarily self-disclosed. For more information, please visit the following Enforcement Release.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250715

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934501/download?inline

 

*******

July 29, 2025: The Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce (“BIS”), has notified Inc., of its intention to initiate an administrative proceeding against Andritz Inc. pursuant to Section 766.3 of the Export Administration Regulations (the “Regulations”), through the issuance of a Proposed Charging Letter to Andritz Inc. that alleges that Andritz Inc. committed 36 violations of the Regulations.  Specifically:

 

STATEMENT OF CHARGES

 

Charges 1 - 36 15 C.F.R. § 764.2(a) – Engaging in Prohibited Conduct

 

As described in the Schedule of Violations, between on or about May 25, 2023, through on or about February 12, 2024, Andritz Inc. engaged in conduct prohibited by the Regulations on 36 occasions when it exported refiner plates, valued at $3,154,794.36, to Andritz Fiedler. Andritz Fiedler then reexported the refiner plates to Russia. The sales to Russia were conducted without the requisite license or other authorization from BIS.

 

The items reexported by Andritz Fiedler are classified EAR99. However, because these items were classified by Harmonized Tariff Schedule (“HTS”) codes which appeared on Supplement No. 4 to Part 746 of the EAR at the time of export, these items required a license for export to Russia pursuant to § 746.8 of the EAR. On May 23, 2023, BIS added license requirements for the items to limit Russia’s access to items that enable its military capabilities and to sources of revenue that could support those capabilities. 88 Fed. Reg. 33422. Refiner plates are used in the refining process of paper pulp making machines. Paper pulp is a basic component of manufacturing paper. While there is no evidence that Andritz Inc.’s refiner plates were designed for, used, or could be used, for military-related purposes, wood and flax pulp could potentially have military application.

 

Supplement No. 4 to Part 746 of the Regulations identifies ‘industrial goods’ which require a BIS license for export, reexport, or transfer (in-country) to Russia or Belarus. For the purposes of this license requirement, an ‘industrial good’ is any item identified in Supplement No. 4 to Part 746 of the Regulations. The HTS classifications of the items contained in each of Andritz Inc.’s 36 exports are detailed in the Schedule of Violations below.

 

Upon learning of the transactions, Andritz Inc. took immediate steps to investigate the matter, voluntarily disclosed the transactions in a timely fashion to BIS, and retained outside counsel to investigate. According to information it voluntarily disclosed to BIS, Andritz Inc. exported refiner plates to Andritz Fiedler without the requisite license. Andritz Fielder then sold and shipped the refiner plates to entities within Russia.

 

In total, from on or about May 25, 2023, through on or about February 12, 2024, Andritz Inc. engaged in 36 transactions involving the reexport of refiner plates. Each of these transactions involved items classified by an HTS code listed in Supplement No. 4 to Part 746 of the EAR and required a license for export to Russia pursuant to § 746.8(a)(5) of the EAR.

 

By engaging in 36 reexports to Russia without the requisite license or other authorization from BIS, Andritz Inc. committed 36 violations of § 764.2(a) of the Regulations.

 

https://media.bis.gov/press-release/bis-reaches-administrative-enforcement-settlement-andritz-inc.-order

 

*******

 

Sanctions

 

 

Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

 

July 1, 2025:  The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is designating Aeza Group, a bulletproof hosting (BPH) services provider, for its role in supporting cybercriminal activity targeting victims in the United States and around the world.  BPH service providers sell access to specialized servers and other computer infrastructure designed to help cybercriminals like ransomware actors, personal information stealers, and drug vendors evade detection and resist law enforcement attempts to disrupt their malicious activities.  OFAC is also designating two affiliated companies and four individuals who are Aeza Group leaders.  Finally, in coordination with the United Kingdom’s (UK) National Crime Agency (NCA), OFAC is designating an Aeza Group front company in the UK.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Bozoyan, Yurii Meruzhanovich of Russia;
  • Gast, Valdimir Vyacheslavovich of Russia;
  • Knyazev, Igor Anatolyevich of Russia; and
  • Penzev, Arsenii Aleksandrovich of Russia.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Aeza Group LLC of Russia;
  • Aeza International, Ltd. of the United Kingdom;
  • Aeza Logistics LLC of Russia; and
  • Cloud Solutions LLC of Russia.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250701

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0185

 

*******

 

July 3, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) took action against networks that have collectively transported and purchased billions of dollars’ worth of Iranian oil, some of which has benefited Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force (IRGC-QF), a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization. Among the entities sanctioned is a network of companies run by Iraqi businessman Salim Ahmed Said (Said) that has profited from smuggling Iranian oil disguised as, or blended with, Iraqi oil. Treasury also sanctioned several vessels engaged in the covert delivery of Iranian oil, intensifying pressure on Iran’s “shadow fleet.”

 

The following individual has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Said, Salim Ahmed of the United Arab Emirates.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Aria Sina Control International Technical Inspection Co. of Iran;
  • Asian Sean Angel Shipping Co of Iran;
  • Betensh Global Investment Limited and Dong Dong Shipping Limited of the Virgin Islands;
  • Breeze Marine Asset Management Inc of the Marshall Islands;
  • Dima Shipping and Trading Company of Turkey;
  • Egir Shipping Ltd of Mahe Island;
  • Fotis Lines Incorporated of the Marshall Islands;
  • Grat Shipping Co Ltd of Mahe Island;
  • Isle Innovation Inc of Panama;
  • Keval Methanol Company of Iran;
  • Rhine Shipping DMCC of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Robinbest Limited of the United Kingdom;
  • Sai Saburi Consulting Services Private Limited of India;
  • Tashilat Sarl of India;
  • The Willet Hotel Limited of the United Kingdom;
  • Themis Limited of the Marshall Islands;
  • Trans Arctic Global Marine Services Pte. Ltd. of Singapore;
  • VS Oil Terminal FZE of the United Arab Emirates;
  • VS Petroleum DMCC of the United Arab Emirates;
  • VS Tankers Free Zone Entity of the United Arab Emirates; and
  • White Sands Shipment Corp of Seychelles.

 

The following vessels have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Artemis III (HQZY4) Crude Oil Tanker Honduras flag; MMSI 334983000 (vessel);
  • Atila (TJM0033) Crude Oil Tanker Cameroon flag; MMSI 613769400 (vessel);
  • Bateleur (HOA5120) LPG Tanker Panama flag; MMSI 352980786 (vessel);
  • Bianca Joysel (3E2106) Crude Oil Tanker Panama flag; MMSI 352001069 (vessel);
  • Dijilah (V7A2015) Crude Oil Tanker Marshall Islands flag; MMSI 538008147 (vessel):
  • Elizabet (TJMC263) Crude Oil Tanker Cameroon flag; MMSI 613001301 (vessel);
  • Fotis (D6A3948) LPG Tanker Comoros flag; MMSI 620999948 (vessel);
  • Gas Maryam (T8A4824) LPG Tanker Palau flag; MMSI 511101457 (vessel);
  • Neel (3E2234) LPG Tanker Panama flag; MMSI 352002246 (vessel);
  • Rieveria I (T7BC7) Crude Oil Tanker San Marino flag; MMSI 268245201 (vessel);
  • Themis (3EFU8) Crude Oil Tanker Panama flag; MMSI 353744000 (vessel); and
  • VIZURI (TJMC707) Crude Oil Tanker Cameroon flag; MMSI 613742000 (vessel).

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250703

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0188

 

*******

 

July 3, 2025: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned seven senior officials and one entity associated with the Hizballah-controlled financial institution Al-Qard Al-Hassan (AQAH), which was designated by OFAC in 2007.  These officials have served in senior management roles for AQAH and have facilitated the evasion of U.S. sanctions, enabling Hizballah’s access to the formal financial system. This action underscores Treasury’s commitment to disrupting Hizballah’s sanctions evasion schemes and supporting efforts by the new Lebanese government to limit the terrorist group’s influence, particularly as entities like AQAH continue to undermine the already fragile Lebanese economy.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Badir, Mohammed Suleiman of Lebanon;
  • Bezz, Imad Mohammad of Lebanon;
  • Fawaz, Samer Hasan of Lebanon;
  • Jamil, Nehme Ahmad of Lebanon;
  • Karnib, Ali Mohamad of Lebanon;
  • Kassir, Issa Hussein of Lebanon;
  • Krishi, Ali Ahmad of Lebanon; and
  • Said, Salim Ahmed of Lebanon.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0189

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250703

 

 

*******

 

July 7, 2025: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)  issued Venezuela-related General License 40D, "Authorizing the Offloading of Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Venezuela."

 

GENERAL LICENSE NO. 40D: “Authorizing the Offloading of Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Venezuela”

 

  • All transactions that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the delivery and offloading of liquefied petroleum gas in Venezuela, involving the Government of Venezuela, Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PdVSA), or any entity in which PdVSA owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest, that are prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 13850 of November 1, 2018, as amended by E.O. 13857 of January 25, 2019, or E.O. 13884 of August 5, 2019, each as incorporated into the Venezuela Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 591 (the VSR), are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, September 5, 2025, provided the liquified petroleum gas was loaded on a vessel on or before July 7, 2025.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934461/download?inline

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250707

 

*******

 

July 8, 2025: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has issued Russia-related General License 13N, "Authorizing Certain Administrative Transactions Prohibited by Directive 4 under Executive Order 14024."

 

GENERAL LICENSE NO. 13N: “Authorizing Certain Administrative Transactions Prohibited by Directive 4 under Executive Order 14024”

 

  • S. persons, or entities owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a U.S. person, are authorized to pay taxes, fees, or import duties, and purchase or receive permits, licenses, registrations, certifications, or tax refunds to the extent such transactions are prohibited by Directive 4 under Executive Order 14024, Prohibitions Related to Transactions Involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, provided such transactions are ordinarily incident and necessary to the day-to-day operations in the Russian Federation of such U.S. persons or entities, through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, October 9, 2025.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934466/download?inline

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250708

 

*******

 

July 8, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned Song Kum Hyok, (Song), a malicious cyber actor associated with the sanctioned Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) Reconnaissance General Bureau (RGB) hacking group Andariel.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

  • Asatryan, Gayk of Russia; and
  • Song, Kum Hyok of North Korea.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Asatryan Limited Liability Company of Russia;
  • Fortuna Limited Liability Company of Russia;
  • Korea Saenal Trading Corporation of North Korea; and
  • Korea Songkwang Trading General Corporation of North Korea.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250708_33

 

*******

 

July 8, 2025: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued Russia-related General License 13N, “Authorizing Certain Administrative Transactions Prohibited by Directive 4 under Executive Order 14024.”

 

GENERAL LICENSE NO. 13N: “Authorizing Certain Administrative Transactions Prohibited by Directive 4 under Executive Order 14024”

 

  • S. persons, or entities owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a U.S. person, are authorized to pay taxes, fees, or import duties, and purchase or receive permits, licenses, registrations, certifications, or tax refunds to the extent such transactions are prohibited by Directive 4 under Executive Order 14024, Prohibitions Related to Transactions Involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, provided such transactions are ordinarily incident and necessary to the day-to-day operations in the Russian Federation of such U.S. persons or entities, through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, October 9, 2025.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934466/download?inline

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250708

 

*******

 

July 9, 2025:  The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated 22 entities based in Hong Kong, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and Türkiye for their roles in facilitating the sale of Iranian oil that benefits the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force (IRGC-QF).  The IRGC-QF is Iran’s most powerful paramilitary force and a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO).

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Amito Trading Limited of China;
  • Bright Spot Goods Wholesalers of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Cetto International Limited of Hong Kong;
  • Finesse Global Trading Limited of China;
  • Future Resource Trading Limited of China;
  • Gah Petrochemical Trading Limited of China;
  • Golden Globe Demir Celik Petrol Sanayi Ve Ticarat Anonim Sirketi of Turkey;
  • JTU Energy Limited of China;
  • Lavida Corporation Limited of China;
  • Marcera Internation Limited of China;
  • Marmerth Limited of China;
  • Matallex Limited of China;
  • Mist Trading Co., Limited of China;
  • Moon Imp and Exp Co., limited of China;
  • Peakway Global Limited of China;
  • Pulcular Enerji Sanayi Vi Ticaret Anonim Sirketi of Turkey;
  • Queens Ring Limited of China;
  • Radix Trade Limited of China;
  • Shelf Trading Limited of China;
  • Star Oilgolbal Limited of China; and
  • Ventus Trade Limited of China.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250709

 

*******

 

July 9, 2025: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued ICC-related General License 8, “Authorizing the Wind Down of Transactions Involving Francesca Paola Albanese.”

 

GENERAL LICENSE NO. 8: “Authorizing the Wind Down of Transactions Involving Francesca Paola Albanese”

 

  • All transactions prohibited by the International Criminal Court-Related Sanctions Regulations (ICCSR), 31 CFR part 528, that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind down of any transaction involving Francesca Paola Albanese (Albanese), or any entity in which Albanese owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest, are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, August 8, 2025, provided that any payment to a blocked person is made into a blocked account in accordance with the ICCSR.

 

The following individual has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Albanese, Francesca Paola of Italy.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250709_33

 

*******

 

July 17, 2025: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned Hector Rusthenford Guerrero Flores (a.k.a. “Niño Guerrero”)—the head of Tren de Aragua—and five other key Tren de Aragua leaders and affiliates. Tren de Aragua is a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) that originated in Venezuela and continues to expand.  Niño Guerrero has grown Tren de Aragua from a prison gang involved in extortion and bribery to an influential organization that threatens public safety throughout the Western Hemisphere.  Tren de Aragua is involved in the illicit drug trade, human smuggling and trafficking, extortion, sexual exploitation of women and children, and money laundering, among other criminal activities.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Castillo Rondon, Felix Anner of Peru;
  • Guerrero Flores, Hector Rusthenford of Venezuela;
  • Perez Castillo, Wilmer Jose of Venezuela;
  • Rios Gomez, Wendy Marbelys of Colombia;
  • Romero, Yohan Jose of Venezuela; and
  • Santana Pena, Josue Angel of Venezuela.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250717

 

*******

 

July 22, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated two individuals and five entities that profit through money laundering and importing petroleum products into territory controlled by Ansarallah, commonly known as the Houthis.  The Iran-backed Houthis gain hundreds of millions of dollars annually by working with Yemeni businessmen to tax petroleum imports, generating critical revenue that funds the Houthis’ destabilizing activities in the region.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Al Wazir, Yahya Mohammed of Yemen; and
  • Al-Sunaydar, Muhammed of Yemen.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Al-Saida Stone For Trading And Agencies of Yemen;
  • Amran Cement Factory of Yemen;
  • Arkan Mars Petroleum Company For Oil Products Imports of Yemen;
  • Arkan Mars Petroleum DMCC of the United Arab Emirates; and
  • Arkan Mars Petroleum FZE of the United Arab Emirates.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250722

 

*******

 

July 24, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned the Korea Sobaeksu Trading Company and three associated individuals—Kim Se Un, Jo Kyong Hun, and Myong Chol Min—for their involvement in the evasion of U.S. and United Nations (UN) sanctions and efforts to generate revenue clandestinely for the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) government, including through fraudulent information technology (IT) worker schemes.  This action to counter the DPRK’s wide-ranging revenue generation schemes is part of a collaborative effort with the Departments of Justice, Homeland Security, and State; the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and Homeland Security Investigations.

 

The following individual has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Jo, Kyong Hun of North Korea;
  • Kim, Se Un of North Korea; and
  • Myong, Chol Min of North Korea.

 

The following entity has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Korea Sobaeksu Trading Corporation of China.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250724

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0205

 

*******

 

June 25, 2025: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned the Cartel de los Soles (a.k.a. Cartel of the Suns) as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist.  Cartel de los Soles is a Venezuela-based criminal group headed by Nicolas Maduro Moros and other high-ranking Venezuelan individuals in the Maduro regime that provides material support to foreign terrorist organizations threatening the peace and security of the United States, namely Tren de Aragua and the Sinaloa Cartel.

 

The following entity has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Cartel De Los Soles of Venezuela.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250725

 

*******

 

July 30, 2025: In its largest Iran-related action since 2018, the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated more than 50 individuals and entities and identifying more than 50 vessels that are part of the vast shipping empire controlled by Mohammad Hossein Shamkhani (Hossein). Hossein—the son of Ali Shamkhani, a top political advisor to the Supreme Leader of Iran—leverages corruption through his father’s political influence at the highest levels of the Iranian regime to build and operate a massive fleet of tankers and containerships. This network transports oil and petroleum products from Iran and Russia, as well as other cargo, to buyers around the world, generating tens of billions of dollars in profit.

 

The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has issued Iran General License R, “Authorizing Limited Safety and Environmental Transactions and the Offloading of Cargo Involving Certain Persons or Vessels Blocked on July 30, 2025.”

 

GENERAL LICENSE R: “Authorizing Limited Safety and Environmental Transactions and the Offloading of Cargo Involving Certain Persons or Vessels Blocked on July 30, 2025”

 

  • All transactions prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 13902 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to one or more of the following activities involving the blocked vessels or blocked persons listed in the Annex to this general license, and any entity in which those blocked persons own, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest, are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, October 1, 2025, provided that any payment to a blocked person must be made into a blocked interest-bearing account located in the United States:

 

(1) The safe docking and anchoring in, and departure from, any port, excluding ports located in Iran or the Russian Federation, or under the control of the Government of Iran or the Government of the Russian Federation, of the blocked vessels listed in the Annex to this general license (the “Blocked Vessels”);

(2) The preservation of the health or safety of the crew of any of the Blocked Vessels;

(3) Emergency repairs of any of the Blocked Vessels or environmental mitigation or protection activities relating to any of the Blocked Vessels; or

(4) The delivery and offloading of cargo involving the Blocked Vessels, provided that the cargo was loaded on or before July 30, 2025 and that the delivery and offloading of cargo does not occur at any port located in Iran or the Russian Federation or under the control of the Government of Iran or the Government of the Russian Federation.

 

Please see full list of sanctioned individuals, entities, and vessels at the link below:

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250730_33

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934536/download?inline

 

*******

 

JULY 2025 EXPORT CONTROLS AND COMPLIANCE UPDATES Read More »

Advanced Computing IC Controls – Impacts On Company Compliance Programs

Creighton Chin – Senior Associate – Compliance

FD Associates

 

On May 13, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry & Security (“BIS”) published a policy statement, accompanied by two guidance documents, that introduced new license requirements under the Export Administration Regulations (“EAR”) for the exports, reexports, and transfers of Advanced Computing Integrated Circuits (IC), and other commodities for use with Artificial Intelligence (AI) models that support Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) and military-intelligence in certain countries.

 

The key points of these documents are summarized below.

 

  • The BIS policy statement, Controls that May Apply to Advanced Computing Integrated Circuits (IC) and Other Commodities Used to Train AI Models, (herein after referred to May 13 AI Policy Statement) requires exporters and re-exporters to obtain a BIS license to export, reexport, or transfer a commodity classified under Export Control Classification Numbers (ECCN) 3A090.a, 4A090.a  and .z items in Categories 3, 4, and 5, e.g. 5A992.z, when there is “knowledge[1]” that the commodity will be used in an AI model that will further the use of WMDs or military intelligence activities in a D:5 country, or for or on behalf of an entity headquartered in a D:5 country.This license requirement applies to U.S. persons that provide any support or performs any contract, service, or employment, when there is “knowledge” that the activities and services will be used for or may assist the training of AI models for or on behalf of parties headquartered in D:5 countries (including China) or Macau.Exporters and re-exporters should presume a policy of denial consistent with policies stated in Part 744.6 – Restriction on Specific Activities of “U.S. Persons”; Part 744.22 - Restrictions on Export, Reexports, and Transfers to certain Military-Intelligence End Users; and Part 744.23, “Supercomputer,” “Advanced - Node Integrated Circuits,” and Semiconductor Manufacturing Equipment End Use Controls, of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) for any D:5 country.
  • In its guidance document, Industry Guidance to Prevent Diversion of Advanced Computing Integrated Circuits, BIS provided to exporters and reexporters AI-oriented behavioral and transactional red flags that will trigger a license under the May 13 AI Policy Statement when not mitigated. These red flags add to the “Know Your Customer” Guidance and Red Flags published in Supplement No. 3 to Part 732 of the EAR.

Included with this guidance are due diligence actions required for vetting companies involved in the use or export of AI ICs to destinations outside country Group A:1.

 

This latest knowledge-based end user and end use control and the related due diligence actions, such as evaluating a customer’s ownership structure, adds to the list of other knowledge-based end user and end use restrictions in Part 744 that companies must address when doing business internationally.

 

These requirements and those under consideration by BIS, such as implementing a 50% ownership similar to one imposed by the Office of  Foreign Asset Controls (OFAC) and proposed rules that will expand the scope of intelligence gathering restrictions, require a company to continuously evaluate its compliance program to ensure that it evolves with regulatory changes, as well as those within the company, to prevent violations under the EAR.

 

We recommend that companies - even those that are not affected by this new requirement - review their compliance programs to ensure it includes a robust end user and end use screening process that reviews transactions against the denied and restricted party lists and the Parts 744 and 746 controls. The process should include methodologies for collecting end user and end use information, as well as for red flag identification with increasing levels of due diligence and risk mitigation that matches the identified risk level.  BIS has stated recently that it expects companies to be derisking high risk transactions as described in the various guidance documents and in the EAR and will penalize companies that ignore red flags.

 

Companies should assess whether their screening tools used for denied and restricted party screening screens the parties to the transaction against relevant lists. The relevant list extends beyond the lists specified under the EAR and include, as stated in the guidance, the Office of Foreign Assets Control’s (OFAC) Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List, or the U.S. Department of State’s Statutorily Debarred Parties List. In practice, the screening lists should include all the lists administered by OFAC and the DoS.  As part of assessment, companies should ensure their screening tools and processes rescreens entities against updates to the lists and flags to responsible employees any open transactions involving a potential match.

 

With the increasing likelihood that BIS will implement a 50% ownership rule, companies must now consider enhancing their screening process to include an evaluation of an entity’s ownership structure and relevant close affiliations. This is necessary to determine whether the entity is 50% or more owned by a party on the Entity List or other restricted party lists that could prohibit the transaction or trigger a license requirement under the EAR.

 

Evaluating a company’s ownership structure and potential connections to restricted or sanctioned parties may be supported through ownership research services provided by Kharon, Dow Jones, and Dun & Bradstreet. Additional sources include investor reports, open-sourced platforms (e.g. OpenSanctions.org, and China Defence University Tracker), and general internet searches.  Each has its strengths and limitations and should be used to augment traditional screening tools.

 

Finally, the review should evaluate whether the compliance program provides ongoing training to the employees responsible for screening transactions. Training should include update on regulatory changes, effective use of the screening tools and techniques for researching an entity’s ownership, and changes in the company’s activities (e.g. introduction of new productions or markets) that could subject the activity under existing proposed rules.

 

As export control regulations continue to evolve and government regulators place greater emphasis on companies to know their customers and to mitigate risk of diversion, companies that fail to regularly review and update their compliance program expose themselves to significant penalties.

 

A robust end user and end use screening process is one element of a compliance program.

 

The article Does Your Export Compliance Program Pass Muster? highlights essential elements of an effective compliance program and challenges that companies may face when implementing a program.  FD Associates has the expertise and experience to navigate these challenges and can support your company with targeted solutions, such as enhancing your end user and end use screening processes or developing a compliance program tailored to your company.

[1] Knowledge. Knowledge of a circumstance (the term may be a variant, such as "know," "reason to know," or "reason to believe") includes not only positive knowledge that the circumstance exists or is substantially certain to occur, but also an awareness of a high probability of its existence or future occurrence. Such awareness is inferred from evidence of the conscious disregard of facts known to a person and is also inferred from a person's willful avoidance of facts.

Advanced Computing IC Controls – Impacts On Company Compliance Programs Read More »

JUNE 2025 EXPORT CONTROLS AND COMPLIANCE UPDATES

This newsletter is a listing of the latest changes in export control regulations through June 30, 2025.  The newsletter is provided as a complimentary service to assist exporters with their ITAR and EAR export compliance responsibilities. It provides a summary of recent changes to export control regulations or other regulatory matters of interest that may impact your company’s international trade and export compliance functions. Call us at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net with questions or comments.

See also our “Latest Sanctions Fines & Penalties” section below for an update on companies and persons denied export privileges by the United States Government.

In this newsletter, we have added a specific DDTC FAQs section, we think this will be of interest to our readers.

 

REGULATORY UPDATES

 

President

Providing For The Revocation Of Syria Sanctions

June 30, 2025: By the authority vested in President Trump by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), the Syria Accountability and Lebanese Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-175) (Syria Accountability Act), the Chemical and Biological Weapons Control and Warfare Elimination Act of 1991 (Public Law 102-182, title III) (CBW Act), the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act of 2019, as amended (22 U.S.C. 8791 note) (Caesar Act), the Illicit Captagon Trafficking Suppression Act of 2023 (Public Law 118-50, div. P), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1.  Background.  The United States is committed to supporting a Syria that is stable, unified, and at peace with itself and its neighbors.  A united Syria that does not offer a safe haven for terrorist organizations and ensures the security of its religious and ethnic minorities will support regional security and prosperity.  The Secretary of State and the Secretary of the Treasury have taken initial steps towards this goal through the issuance on May 23, 2025, of General License 25 and a waiver of sanctions under the Caesar Act.

Sec2.  Policy.  It is the policy of the United States to recognize that circumstances that gave rise to the actions taken in the Executive Orders described in section 3(a) of this order, related to the policies and actions of the former regime of Bashar al-Assad, have been transformed by developments over the past 6 months, including the positive actions taken by the new Syrian government under President Ahmed al-Sharaa.  This order supports United States national security and foreign policy goals by directing additional actions, including the removal of sanctions on Syria, the issuance of waivers that permit the relaxation of export controls and other restrictions on Syria, and other actions to be taken by the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Commerce, as well as by other executive departments and agencies (agencies) of the United States, without providing relief to ISIS or other terrorist organizations, human rights abusers, those linked to chemical weapons or proliferation-related activities, or other persons that threaten the peace, security, or stability of the United States, Syria, and its neighbors.

Sec3.  Revocation of Syria Sanctions.  (a)  Effective July 1, 2025, President Trump hereby terminates the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13338 of May 11, 2004 (Blocking Property of Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Export of Certain Goods to Syria), and revoke that order, as well as Executive Order 13399 of April 25, 2006 (Blocking Property of Additional Persons in Connection With the National Emergency With Respect to Syria), Executive Order 13460 of February 13, 2008 (Blocking Property of Additional Persons in Connection With the National Emergency With Respect to Syria), Executive Order 13572 of April 29, 2011 (Blocking Property of Certain Persons with Respect to Human Rights Abuses in Syria), Executive Order 13573 of May 18, 2011 (Blocking Property of Senior Officials of the Government of Syria), and Executive Order 13582 of August 17, 2011 (Blocking Property of the Government of Syria and Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to Syria).
(b)  Pursuant to section 202(a) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1622(a)), termination of the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13338, as modified in scope and relied upon for additional steps taken in Executive Order 13399, Executive Order 13460, Executive Order 13572, Executive Order 13573, and Executive Order 13582 shall not affect any action taken or pending proceeding not finally concluded or determined as of July 1, 2025, any action or proceeding based on any act committed prior to July 1, 2025, or any rights or duties that matured or penalties that were incurred prior to July 1, 2025.

Sec4.  Accountability for the Former Regime of Bashar al‑Assad.  President Trump finds that additional steps must be taken to ensure meaningful accountability for perpetrators of war crimes, human rights violations and abuses, and the proliferation of narcotics trafficking networks in and in relation to Syria during the former regime of Bashar al-Assad and by those associated with it.  Perpetrators of such actions threaten to undermine peace, security, and stability in the region, and thereby constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.

  • President Trump hereby expands the scope of the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13894 of October 14, 2019 (Blocking Property and Suspending Entry of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Syria), as amended in and relied on for additional steps taken in Executive Order 14142 of January 15, 2025 (Taking Additional Steps With Respect to the Situation in Syria), to deal with that threat, and accordingly further amend Executive Order 13894 by:

(i)   striking section 1(a) and inserting, in lieu thereof, the following:
“Section 1.  (a)  All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:

  • any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State:

(A)  to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, or attempted to engage in, any of the following in or in relation to Syria:

  • actions or policies that further threaten the peace, security, stability, or territorial integrity of Syria; or
  • the commission of serious human rights abuse;

(B)  to be a former government official of the former regime of Bashar al-Assad or a person who acted for or on behalf of such an official;

(C)  to have engaged in, or attempted to engage in, activities or transactions that have materially contributed to, or pose a significant risk of materially contributing to, the illicit production and international illicit proliferation of captagon;

(D)  to be responsible for or complicit in, to have directly or indirectly engaged in, or to be responsible for ordering, controlling, or otherwise directing, instances in which a United States national ((i) as defined in 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22) or 8 U.S.C. 1408, or (ii) a lawful permanent resident with significant ties to the United States) went missing in Syria during the former regime of Bashar al-Assad;
(E)  to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of:

(1)  the former regime of Bashar al-Assad;

(2)  any activity described in subsections (a)(i)(A)–(a)(i)(D) of this section; or

(3)  any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order;

(F)  to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(G)  to be an adult family member of a person designated under subsections (a)(i)(A)–(a)(i)(D) of this section.”; and

(ii)  striking section 2(a) and inserting, in lieu thereof, the following:
“Sec. 2.  (a)  The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and other officials of the United States Government as appropriate, is hereby authorized to impose on a foreign person any of the sanctions described in subsections (b) and (c) of this section, upon determining that the person, on or after the date of this order:

  • is responsible for or complicit in, has directly or indirectly engaged in, or attempted to engage in, or financed the obstruction, disruption, or prevention of efforts to promote a Syria that is stable, unified, and at peace with itself and its neighbors, including:

(A)  the convening and conduct of a credible and inclusive Syrian-led constitutional process;

(B)  the preparation for and conduct of supervised elections, pursuant to the new constitution, that are free and fair and to the highest international standards of transparency and accountability; or

(C)  the development of a Syrian government that is representative and reflects the will of the Syrian people;
(ii)   is an adult family member of a person designated under subsection (a)(i) of this section; or
(iii) is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in, or attempted to engage  in, the expropriation of property, including real property, for personal gain or political purposes in Syria.”

(b)  President Trump additionally amends Executive Order 13606 of April 22, 2012 (Blocking the Property and Suspending Entry into the United States of Certain Persons With Respect to Grave Human Rights Abuses by the Governments of Iran and Syria Via Information Technology), by removing the following text from the preamble:  “Executive Order 13338 of May 11, 2004, as modified in scope and relied upon for additional steps in subsequent Executive Orders” and replacing it with:  “Executive Order 13894 of October 14, 2019, and relied upon for additional steps and further amended in subsequent Executive Orders.”

Sec5.  Caesar Act.  The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, shall examine whether the criteria set forth in section 7431(a) of the Caesar Act have been met, and on the basis of that examination may, pursuant to the Presidential Memorandum of March 31, 2020 (Delegation of Certain Functions and Authorities Under the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020), suspend in whole or in part the imposition of sanctions otherwise required under the Caesar Act.  If the Secretary of State determines to suspend in whole or in part the imposition of such sanctions, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, shall provide the briefing to the appropriate congressional committees required by section 7431(b) of the Caesar Act within 30 days of such determination.  Further, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, shall continue to review the situation in Syria, and if the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, determines that the criteria set forth in section 7431(a) are no longer met, the Secretary of State shall reimpose sanctions.

Sec6.  Syria Accountability Act.  President Trump hereby determines pursuant to section 5(b) of the Syria Accountability Act that it is in the national security interest of the United States to waive the application of subsection (a)(1), with respect to items on the Commerce Control List (supp. No. 1 to 15 C.F.R. part 774) only, and subsection (a)(2)(A) of the Syria Accountability Act only.  The Secretary of State shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees the report required under section 5(b) of that Act.

Sec7.  CBW Act.  (a)  Pursuant to section 307(d)(1)(B) of the CBW Act, President Trump hereby determines and certify that there has been a fundamental change in the leadership and policies of the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic.  Accordingly, President Trump hereby waives the following sanctions imposed on Syria for the prior use of chemical weapons under the former regime of Bashar al-Assad:

  • the restriction on foreign assistance under section 307(a)(1) of the CBW Act;

(ii)   the restriction on United States Government credit, credit guarantees, or other financial assistance    under section 307(a)(4) of the CBW Act;

(iii)  the restrictions on the export of national security-sensitive goods and technology under section 307(a)(5) of the CBW Act and on all other goods and technology under section 307(b)(2)(C) of the CBW Act; and

(iv)   the restriction on United States banks from making any loan or providing any credit to the Government of Syria under section 307(b)(2)(B) of the CBW Act.

(b)  The Secretary of State shall transmit this waiver determination and report as required by sections 307(d)(1)(B) and (d)(2) of the CBW Act to the appropriate congressional committees.  This waiver shall be effective 20 days after it has been so transmitted.

Sec8.  Counterterrorism Designations.  (a)  The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Attorney General, shall take all appropriate action with respect to the designation of al-Nusrah Front, also known as Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham and other aliases, as a Foreign Terrorist Organization under 8 U.S.C. 1189 and as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist under 50 U.S.C. 1702 and Executive Order 13224, as well as the designation of Abu Muhammad al Jawlani, commonly known as Ahmed al-Sharaa, as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist.

(b)  The Secretary of State shall take all appropriate action to review the designation of Syria as a State Sponsor of Terrorism consistent with section 1754(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115-232; 50 U.S.C. 4813(c)), section 40 of the Arms Export Control Act (Public Law 90-629, as amended; 22 U.S.C. 2780), and section 620A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (Public Law 87-195, as amended; 22 U.S.C. 2371).

Sec9.  United Nations.  The Secretary of State shall take appropriate steps to advance United States policy objectives at the United Nations to support a Syria that is stable and at peace and to support Syrian efforts to counter terrorism and comply with its responsibilities and obligations concerning weapons of mass destruction, including chemical and biological weapons.  The Secretary of State is further directed to explore avenues at the United Nations to provide sanctions relief in support of these objectives.

Sec10.  Implementation.  The Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Commerce, as appropriate, are hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, as may be necessary to implement this order.  The Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Commerce may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions within their respective agencies.  The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Commerce, and the Secretary of Transportation, as appropriate, is authorized to exercise the functions and authorities conferred upon the President in section 5 of the Syria Accountability Act and to redelegate these functions and authorities consistent with applicable law.  All agencies of the United States shall take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement this order, consistent with applicable law.

Sec11.  General Provisions.

  • Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary,

administrative, or legislative proposals.

  • This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
  • This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

(d)  The costs for publication of this order shall be borne by the Department of State.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/06/providing-for-the-revocation-of-syria-sanctions/

*******

Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC)

Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls: Notifications to the Congress of Proposed Commercial Export Licenses

June 11, 2025: 90 Fed. Reg. 23097: The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls and the Department of State give notice that the attached Notifications of Proposed Commercial Export Licenses were submitted to the Congress on the dates indicated.

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/sys_attachment.do?sys_id=7aaf6c0a970622900083b3b0f053af61 and

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_public_portal_news_and_events

*******

Determinations Regarding Use of Chemical Weapons by Sudan Under the Chemical and Biological Weapons Control and Warfare Elimination Act of 1991

June 27, 2025: 90 Fed. Reg. 27750: Pursuant to sections 306(a), 307(a), and 307(d) of the Chemical and Biological Weapons Control and Warfare Elimination Act of 1991 (22 U.S.C. 5604(a), 5605(a), and 5605(d)), on April 24, 2025 the Senior Official performing the functions of the Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security determined that the Government of Sudan has used chemical or biological weapons in violation of international law or lethal chemical or biological weapons against its own nationals. As a result, the following sanctions were imposed:

  1. Foreign Assistance: Termination of assistance to Sudan under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, except for urgent humanitarian assistance and food or other agricultural commodities or products.

The Senior Official performing the functions of the Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security has determined that it is essential to the national security interests of the United States to waive the application of this restriction.

  1. Arms Sales: Termination of (a) sales to Sudan under the Arms Export Control Act of any defense articles, defense services, or design and construction services, and (b) licenses for the export to Sudan of any item on the United States Munitions List.

The Senior Official performing the functions of the Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security has determined that it is essential to the national security interests of the United States to partially waive the application this sanction to allow for case-by-case adjudication of licenses or other authorizations for defense articles and defense services for entities other than the Government of Sudan on a case-by-case basis for the purposes described pursuant to section 126.1(v) of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR).

  1. Arms Sales Financing: Termination of all foreign military financing for Sudan under the Arms Export Control Act.

 

  1. Denial of United States Government Credit or Other Financial Assistance: Denial to Sudan of any credit, credit guarantees, or other financial assistance by any department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States Government, including the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

 

  1. Exports of National Security-Sensitive Goods and Technology: Prohibition on the export to Sudan of any goods or technology controlled for National Security (NS) reasons on the Commerce Control List (CCL) established under 50 U.S.C. 4813(a)(1).

The Senior Official performing the functions of the Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security has determined that it is essential to the national security interests of the United States to waive the application of this sanction in order to allow the authorization of exports or re-exports of NS-controlled goods or technology to Sudan in accordance with the following policies:

License Exceptions: Exports and re-exports of NS-controlled goods or technology on the CCL may be authorized under License Exceptions GOV, ENC, BAG, TMP, RPL, TSU and ACE, as described in 15 CFR part 740.

Safety of Flight: Exports and re-exports of NS-controlled goods or technology may be authorized pursuant to new licenses when necessary for the safety of flight of civil fixed-wing passenger aviation, provided that such licenses shall be issued consistent with export licensing policy for Sudan prior to the date of the determination.

Deemed Exports/Re-Exports: Exports and re-exports of goods or technology may be authorized pursuant to new licenses for deemed exports and re-exports to Sudanese nationals, provided that such licenses shall be issued consistent with export licensing policy for Sudan prior to the date of the determination.

Wholly Owned U.S. and Other Foreign Subsidiaries: Exports and re-exports of NS controlled goods or technology may be authorized pursuant to new licenses for exports and re-exports to wholly-owned U.S. and other foreign subsidiaries in Sudan, provided that such licenses shall be issued consistent with export licensing policy for Sudan prior to the date of the determination.

These measures shall be implemented by the responsible departments and agencies of the United States government and will remain in place for at least one year and until further notice.

www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/06/27/2025-11896/determinations-regarding-use-of-chemical-weapons-by-sudan-under-the-chemical-and-biological-weapons

*******

 

DDTC Name And Address Changes Posted To Website

 

June 3 through June 13, 2025: The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) posted the following name and/or address changes on its website at    

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_kb_article_page&sys_id=bd72ca0adbf8d30044f9ff621f961981:

  • Change in Name of Jacobs Australia Pty Limited to Amentum Australia Proprietary Limited due to merger;
  • Change in Address of FISBA, LLC from 983 Riverside Street, Portland, ME 04103 to 6 Willey Road, Saco, ME 04072;
  • Change in Address of GE Aviation Systems North America LLC - Abu Dhabi from Al Hisn, East 6, C5, building Amna Ahmed Mohamed O, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates to Al Hisn, East 6, C5, building Amna Ahmed Mohamed Onwani, 621, Zayet The First St., Al Hisn, Abu Dhabi 20035, United Arab Emirates;
  • Change in Name of Centum Solutions S.L. to Bertrandt Technology Spain S.L. D due to acquisition.

 

*******

 

DDTC Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

 

Q: What does it mean to be on one of DDTC's lists of debarred parties?

 

A: Persons subject to statutory or administrative debarment are generally prohibited from participating directly or indirectly in ITAR-controlled activities, such as the export of technical data and other defense articles and the furnishing of defense services for which a license or other approval is required.  Also, pursuant to ITAR § 127.1(d), it is a violation for a person with knowledge that another person is ineligible under ITAR § 120.16(c), which includes debarred parties, to, among other things, apply for, obtain, or use an export control document on behalf of a debarred party, or participate in a transaction subject to the ITAR that will benefit a debarred party, without first obtaining DDTC’s approval.

 

DDTC has specified the consequences of debarment in the ITAR, and the Federal Register Notices announcing the debarment provide further detail regarding the debarment.  DDTC does not impose any restrictions on a debarred party’s eligibility to obtain banking services, engage in real estate transactions, purchase automobiles, or participate in any other activity not controlled under the ITAR.

 

Q: Where can I find or track the status of my registration?

 

A: Registrations submitted in DECCS can be tracked in the DECCS registration application on the Registration Dashboard page under the “In Progress” or “Active Registration” sections.

 

It normally takes 30 days on average from the time the registration application is submitted for DDTC to adjudicate your registration. Once the review has been completed and approved, the Registration Dashboard with be updated to show the new status of the registration application.  Please refer to What are the Registration Status Definitions? (KB0011498) for details on the various Registration Status Codes.

 

Q: What is the benefit of citing precedent cases?

 

A: Citing relevant precedent cases assists the Licensing Officer in reviewing the proposed application by providing license and staffing history. It is requested that the cited precedent be for the same commodity and same end-use/end-user of the proposed application

 

Q: If I am a U.S. person providing a defense service to a foreign entity, do I need to register with DDTC?

 

A: That will depend upon whether you are permanently residing in the United States or abroad. Registration is not required if you both physically reside and provide the defense service outside the United States. Under ITAR § 122.1(a), registration is required only for persons who engage in the United States in the business of furnishing defense services or manufacturing, exporting, or temporarily importing defense articles. If at any point you engage in the United States in the business of furnishing defense services (to include remote work/telework), you would be required to register with the Department unless otherwise exempted from the registration requirement as described in ITAR § 122.1(b).

 

Q: DECCS says that my authorization has been approved but I have not yet received my authorization letter. What do I do?

 

A: Authorization letters are electronically sent to the to the applicant’s email address as provided in the application. If it has been more than a week since the case closed in DECCS, check your junk mail folder. Authorization letters will come from DDTCPaperCase@state.gov. If after checking your spam folder you find that you still have not received the authorization, email the USPAB Case Status Orgbox at PM-DTCL-USPAB-Status@state.gov.

 

*******

 

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA)

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Kuwait

 

June 4, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Kuwait has requested to buy equipment and services related to sustainment support for legacy M1A2 and new M1A2K Abrams main battle tank systems. The following non-MDE items will be included: repair parts; spare parts; replacement materials; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $325 million. The principal contractor will be General Dynamics Land Systems, located in Sterling Heights, MI. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4206289/kuwait-m1a2-abrams-main-battle-tank-system-sustainment-support

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To The Netherlands

 

June 12, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of the Netherlands has requested to buy two hundred ninety-six (296) AGM-179A Joint Air-to-Ground Missiles (JAGM).  The following non-MDE items will also be included:  AGM-179 JAGM Captive Air Training Missiles (CATM); Tactical Aviation Ground Munition Program (TAGM) office technical assistance; Security Assistance Management Directorate (SAMD), Joint Attack Munition Systems (JAMS) technical assistance; missile handling training; classified and unclassified publications; spare parts; repair and return; storage; and other related elements of program and logistical support.  The estimated total cost is $215 million. The principal contractor will be Lockheed Martin Corporation, located in Orlando, FL.  At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale.  Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4215271/the-netherlands-joint-air-to-ground-missiles

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Italy

 

June 16, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Italy has requested to buy thirty (30) AIM-120D-3 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM), forty (40) AIM-120C-8 AMRAAMs, and two (2) AIM-120C-7 AMRAAM guidance sections.  The following non-MDE items will also be included:  AMRAAM control section spares and containers; spare and repair parts, consumables, accessories, and repair and return support; weapon system support and software; classified and unclassified software delivery and support; classified and unclassified publications and technical documentation; personnel training and training equipment; U.S. government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistical support services; and other related elements of logistics and program support.  The estimated total cost is $211 million. The principal contractor will be RTX Corporation, located in Tucson, AZ.  At this time, the U.S. government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale.  Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4217573/italy-advanced-medium-range-air-to-air-missiles

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Australia

 

June 16, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Australia has requested to buy the following equipment and services related to sustainment of its F/A-18F Super Hornet and EA-18G Growler aircraft fleet: sixty (60) Global Lightning – Joint Tactical Terminal – Transceivers (JTT-X); forty (40) Advanced Electronic Warfare systems; and twenty-four (24) Next Generation Electronic Attack Units (NGEAU). The following non-MDE items will also be included: AN/PYQ-10C Simple Key Loaders; Inline Network Encryptors; AN/ALE-47 electronic warfare countermeasures systems (common carriage); Joint Mission Planning System (JMPS) software; aircraft spares and repair parts; other support equipment; software and hardware updates and development; system configuration upgrades; avionics software support; aircraft armament equipment; Foreign Liaison Officer support; technical data; engineering change proposals; engine component improvements; training and training equipment; training aids, devices, and spares; flight test services; transportation costs; system integration and testing; software development and integration; tools and test equipment; U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics support services; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $2.0 billion. The principal contractor will be The Boeing Company, located in Arlington, VA. At this time, the U.S. Government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4217508/australia-fa-18f-and-ea-18g-sustainment-support

*******

DSCA Notifies Congress of Potential FMS Sale To Israel

June 30, 2025: The U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notified Congress that the Government of Israel has requested to buy three thousand eight hundred forty-five (3,845) KMU-558B/B Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) guidance kits for the BLU-109 bomb body and three thousand two hundred eighty (3,280) KMU-572 F/B JDAM guidance kits for the MK 82 bomb body. The following non-MDE items will also be included: U.S. government and contractor engineering, logistics, and technical support services; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $510 million. The principal contractor will be The Boeing Company, located in St. Charles, MO. Part of the JDAM guidance kit requirement may be transferred from U.S. government stock. At this time, the U.S. government is not aware of any offset agreement proposed in connection with this potential sale. Any offset agreement will be defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.

https://www.dsca.mil/Press-Media/Major-Arms-Sales/Article-Display/Article/4230375/israel-munitions-guidance-kits-and-munitions-support

 

*******

U.S. Census Bureau

How to Resolve Common AES Response Messages

June 17, 2025:

When submitting your Electronic Export Information (EEI) to the Automated Export System (AES), you can receive different response messages: Fatal, Compliance, Verify, Informational and Warning.  It is important that AES filers address and/or correct Response Messages as soon as they are received to comply with the Foreign Trade Regulations.

To help you take the appropriate action, here is guidance on how to address one of the most frequent Response Messages that were generated in the AES for the previous month.

Response Code:  504

Narrative:     License Code Unknown

Severity:       Fatal

Reason:        The License Code reported is not valid in AES.

Resolution:  The License Code/License Exemption Code must be reported on each EEI.  Valid License Codes reportable in AES can be found in Appendix F – License and License Exemption Type Codes and Reporting Guidelines.

Verify the License Code/License Exemption Code, correct the shipment and resubmit.

For a complete list of the AES Response Codes, their reasons and resolutions, see Appendix A – Commodity Filing Response Messages.

*******

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) removed from the Automated Export System Trade Interface Requirements (AESTIR)

June 25, 2025:

CSMS # 65439382 - Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) removed from the Automated Export System Trade Interface Requirements (AESTIR)

The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) has inactivated its Partner Government Agency (PGA) Export Message Set. References for TTB have been removed from Appendices Q and X of the Automated Export System Trade Interface Requirement (AESTIR). Previously, the submission of TTB PGA export message set had been voluntary. TTB discontinued collection of this data as a deregulatory action.

Referenced appendices can be viewed here: https://www.cbp.gov/trade/aes/aestir/appendices

LATEST SANCTIONS FINES & PENALTIES

 

This section of our newsletter provides information on the latest sanctions, fines and penalties for export violations or matters of non-compliance with the ITAR or EAR issued by the US government enforcement agencies. It is provided as a service to exporters and associates of FD Associates to remind them of the importance of extreme due diligence in all international trade and export compliance matters, particularly those involving exports subject to the ITAR or the EAR. Don't let this happen to you or your company! Call us with questions or concerns at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net.

 

Fines and Penalties

 

Department of Commerce – Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

 

June 9, 2025: A 22-count indictment was unsealed charging Iurii Gugnin, also known as Iurii Mashukov and George Goognin, 38, a resident of New York and citizen of Russia, with various offenses related to using his cryptocurrency company Evita to funnel more than $500 million of overseas payments through U.S. banks and cryptocurrency exchanges while hiding the source and purpose of the transactions.

 

According to court documents, Gugnin is charged with wire and bank fraud, conspiracy to defraud the United States, violation of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), operating an unlicensed money transmitting business, failing to implement an effective anti-money laundering compliance program, failing to file suspicious activity reports, money laundering, and related conspiracy charges. Gugnin was arrested and arraigned in New York.

 

If convicted, Gugnin faces a maximum penalty of 30 years in prison for each count of bank fraud; a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison for each of the wire fraud, IEEPA, money laundering, and related conspiracy counts; a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison for failure to implement an effective anti-money laundering program and failure to file suspicious activity reports; and a maximum penalty of five years in prison for conspiracy to defraud the United States and operating an unlicensed money transmitting business.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/founder-cryptocurrency-payment-company-charged-evading-sanctions-and-export-controls

https://media.bis.gov/news-updates

 

*******

 

June 10, 2025: An illegal alien from China pleaded guilty to federal criminal charges for illegally exporting firearms, ammunition and other military items to North Korea by concealing them inside shipping containers that departed from the Port of Long Beach, California, and for committing this crime at the direction of North Korean government officials, who wired him approximately $2 million for his efforts.

 

Shenghua Wen, 42, of Ontario, California, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and one count of acting as an illegal agent of a foreign government. Wen has been in federal custody since his arrest in December 2024.

 

Wen faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison on the count of violating the IEEPA and a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison on the count of acting as an illegal agent of a foreign government. Sentencing is scheduled for Aug. 18. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/chinese-national-pleads-guilty-acting-direction-north-korea-export-firearms-ammo-and

https://media.bis.gov/news-updates

 

*******

 

June 23, 2025: The Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce (“BIS”), has notified Unicat Catalyst Technologies, LLC, of Alvin, Texas, as successor to Unicat Catalyst Technologies, Inc., (“Unicat”), of its intention to initiate an administrative proceeding against Unicat pursuant to Section 766.3 of the Export Administration Regulations (the “Regulations”), through the issuance of a Proposed Charging Letter to Unicat that alleges that Unicat committed three violations of the Regulations.

 

Specifically: On three occasions between on or about October 2017 through on or about September 2020, Unicat Catalyst Technologies, Inc. (“Legacy Unicat”), which was acquired by a private equity firm and converted into the successor entity Unicat, engaged in conduct prohibited by the Regulations when it sold and arranged for the export of items subject to the EAR and designated EAR99, specifically, catalysts, valued at $391,182.78, with knowledge that these items were intended for export to Iran without the requisite license or other authorization. By arranging for the export of the items without the required license or other authorization, Legacy Unicat committed three violations of Section 764.2(e) of the Regulations.

 

https://media.bis.gov/press-release/bis-reaches-administrative-enforcement-settlement-unicat-catalyst-technologies-llc-order

 

*******

 

Sanctions

 

 

Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

 

June 5, 2025: The United States sanctioned four individuals, currently serving as judges of the International Criminal Court (ICC).   It reflects the seriousness of the threat we face from the ICC’s politicization and abuse of power.  The Department of State’s designations are made pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14203, which authorizes sanctions on foreign persons engaged in certain efforts by the ICC and aims to impose tangible and significant consequences on those directly engaged in the ICC’s transgressions against the United States and Israel.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Alapini Gansou, Reine Adelaide Sophie of the Netherlands;
  • Bossa, Solomy Balungi of the Netherlands;
  • Hohler, Beti of the Netherlands; and
  • Ibanez Carranza, Luz Del Carmen of the Netherlands.

 

The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued ICC-related General License 1, "Authorizing the Wind Down of Transactions Involving Certain Persons Blocked on June 5, 2025," ICC-related General License 2, "Authorizing the Provision of Certain Legal Services;" ICC-related General License 3, "Authorizing Payments for Legal Services From Funds Originating Outside the United States;" ICC-related General License 4, "Authorizing Emergency Medical Services;" ICC-related General License 5, "Entries in Certain Accounts for Normal Service Charges and Payments and Transfers to Blocked Accounts in U.S. Financial Institutions Authorized;" ICC-related General License 6, "Authorizing Transactions Related to the Provision of Agricultural Commodities, Medicine, Medical Devices, Replacement Parts and Components, or Software Updates for Personal, Non-Commercial Use;" and ICC-related General License 7, "Official Business of the United States Government."

 

GENERAL LICENSE NO. 1: “Authorizing the Wind Down of Transactions Involving Certain Persons  Blocked on June 5, 2025” 

 

(a) All transactions prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14203 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind down of any transaction involving one or more of the following blocked persons are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, July 8, 2025, provided that any payment to a blocked person is made into a blocked interest-bearing account located in the United States:

 

(1) Solomy Balungi Bossa;

(2) Luz Del Carmen Ibanez Carranza;

(3) Reine Adelaide Sophie Alapini Gansou;

(4) Beti Hohler; or

(5) Any entity in which one or more of the above persons own, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest.

 

GENERAL LICENSE NO. 2: “Authorizing the Provision of Certain Legal Services”

 

(a) The provision of the following legal services to or on behalf of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14203 is authorized, provided that any receipt of payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses must be authorized pursuant to General License 3 under E.O. 14203, which authorizes certain payments for legal services from funds originating outside the United States; via specific license; or otherwise pursuant to E.O. 14203:

 

(1) Provision of legal advice and counseling on the requirements of and compliance with the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States, provided that such advice and counseling are not provided to facilitate transactions in violation of E.O. 14023;

(2) Representation of persons named as defendants in or otherwise made parties to legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency;

(3) Initiation and conduct of legal, arbitration, or administrative proceedings before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency;

(4) Representation of persons before any U.S. federal, state, or local court or agency with respect to the imposition, administration, or enforcement of U.S. sanctions against such persons; and

(5) Provision of legal services in any other context in which prevailing U.S. law requires access to legal counsel at public expense.

 

(b) The provision of any other legal services to or on behalf of persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to E.O. 14203, not otherwise authorized pursuant to a general license issued pursuant to E.O. 14203, requires the issuance of a specific license.

 

(c) U.S. persons do not need to obtain specific authorization to provide related services, such as making filings and providing other administrative services, that are ordinarily incident to the provision of services authorized by paragraph (a) of this general license.  Additionally, U.S. persons who provide services authorized by paragraph (a) of this general license do not need to obtain specific authorization to contract for related services that are ordinarily incident to the provision of those legal services, such as those provided by private investigators or expert witnesses, or to pay for such services.

 

(d) Entry into a settlement agreement or the enforcement of any lien, judgment, arbitral award, decree, or other order through execution, garnishment, or other judicial process purporting to transfer or otherwise alter or affect property or interests in property blocked pursuant to E.O. 14203 is prohibited unless licensed pursuant to E.O. 14203.

 

GENERAL LICENSE NO. 3: “Authorizing Payments for Legal Services From Funds Originating Outside the United States”

 

(a)(1) Professional fees and incurred expenses. Receipt of payment of professional fees and reimbursement of incurred expenses for the provision of legal services authorized pursuant to General License 2 under Executive Order (E.O.) 14203 to or on behalf of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to E.O. 14203 is authorized from funds originating outside the United States, provided that the funds do not originate from:

 

(i) A source within the United States;

(ii) Any source, wherever located, within the possession or control of a U.S. person; or

(iii) Any individual or entity, other than the person on whose behalf the legal services authorized pursuant to General License 2 under E.O. 14203 are to be provided, whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to E.O. 14203, any part of 31 CFR chapter V, or any other Executive order or statute.

 

(2) Nothing in paragraph (a) authorizes payments for legal services using funds in which any other person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to E.O. 14203, any part of 31 CFR chapter V, or any other Executive order or statute has an interest.

 

(b) Records. U.S. persons who receive payments pursuant to paragraph (a) of this general license must retain for 10 years from the date of the relevant payment, and furnish to OFAC on demand, a record that specifies the following for each payment:

 

(1) The individual or entity from whom the funds originated and the amount of funds received; and  (2) If applicable:

(i) The names of any individuals or entities providing related services to the U.S. person receiving payment in connection with authorized legal services, such as private investigators or expert witnesses;

(ii) A general description of the services provided; and

(iii) The amount of funds paid in connection with such services

 

GENERAL LICENSE NO. 4: “Authorizing Emergency Medical Services”

 

The provision and receipt of nonscheduled emergency medical services that are prohibited by Executive Order 14203 are authorized.

 

GENERAL LICENSE NO. 5: “Entries in Certain Accounts for Normal Service Charges and Payments and Transfers to Blocked Accounts in U.S. Financial Institutions Authorized”

 

(a) A U.S. financial institution is authorized to debit any account blocked pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14203 held at that financial institution in payment or reimbursement for normal service charges owed it by the owner of that blocked account.

 

Note to paragraph (a).  As used in this general license, the term normal service charges shall include charges in payment or reimbursement for interest due; cable, telegraph, internet, or telephone charges; postage costs; custody fees; small adjustment charges to correct bookkeeping errors; and, but not by way of limitation, minimum balance charges, notary and protest fees, and charges for reference books, photocopies, credit reports, transcripts of statements, registered mail, insurance, stationery and supplies, and other similar items.

 

(b) Any payment of funds or transfer of credit in which a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to E.O. 14203 has any interest that comes within the possession or control of a U.S. financial institution must be blocked in an account on the books of that financial institution.  A transfer of funds or credit by a U.S. financial institution between blocked accounts in its branches or offices is authorized, provided that no transfer is made from an account within the United States to an account held outside the United States, and further provided that a transfer from a blocked account may be made only to another blocked account held in the same name.

 

Note to paragraph (b).  Such transfers must be reported to the Office of Foreign Assets Control consistent with § 501.603 of the Reporting, Procedures and Penalties Regulations, 31 CFR part 501.

 

GENERAL LICENSE NO. 6: “Authorizing Transactions Related to the Provision of Agricultural Commodities, Medicine, Medical Devices, Replacement Parts and Components, or Software Updates for Personal, Non-Commercial Use”

 

(a) All transactions prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14203 that are related to the provision, directly or indirectly, of agricultural commodities, medicine, medical devices, replacement parts and components for medical devices, or software updates for medical devices to an individual whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to E.O. 14203 are authorized, provided the items are in quantities consistent with personal, non-commercial use.

 

(b) For the purposes of this general license, agricultural commodities, medicine, and medical devices are defined as follows:

 

(1) Agricultural commodities. For the purposes of this general license, agricultural commodities are:

 

  • Products that fall within the term “agricultural commodity” as defined in section 102 of the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 (7 U.S.C. 5602); and (
  • ii) That are intended for ultimate use as:

(A) Food for humans (including raw, processed, and packaged foods; live animals; vitamins and minerals; food additives or supplements; and bottled drinking water) or animals (including animal feeds);

(B) Seeds for food crops;

(C) Fertilizers or organic fertilizers; or

(D) Reproductive materials (such as live animals, fertilized eggs, embryos, and semen) for the production of food animals.

 

(2) Medicine. For the purposes of this general license, medicine is an item that falls within the definition of the term “drug” in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321).

 

(3) Medical devices. For the purposes of this general license, a medical device is an item that falls within the definition of “device” in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321).

 

Note 1 to General License 6.  This general license does not relieve any person authorized thereunder from complying with any other applicable laws or regulations

 

GENERAL LICENSE NO. 7: “Official Business of the United States Government”

 

All transactions prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14203 that are for the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof are authorized.

 

Note to General License No. 7.  See also section 7 of E.O. 14203, which exempts transactions for the conduct of the official business of the Federal Government by employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250605

https://www.state.gov/imposing-sanctions-in-response-to-the-iccs-illegitimate-actions-targeting-the-united-states-and-israel/

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934326/download?inline

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934331/download?inline

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934336/download?inline

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934341/download?inline

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934346/download?inline

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934351/download?inline and

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934356/download?inline

 

*******

 

June 5, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned four Guyanese nationals and two Colombian nationals responsible for trafficking tons of cocaine from South America to the United States, Europe, and the Caribbean. These sanctions target drug traffickers utilizing boats and narco-subs to traffic ton-quantities of cocaine, along with an alleged corrupt Guyanese law enforcement official.  The sanctions also target individuals that are operating covert airstrips to traffic drugs via aircraft.  For decades, reported corrupt actors have used Guyana as a transshipment point for the movement of drugs from South America to the United States, with Mexican drug cartels also maintaining a presence in the region.  International cocaine trafficking remains a serious threat to the United States, as the substantial profits generated from these sales continue to fund and strengthen cartel operations.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Cromwell, Mark of Guyana;
  • Daby Jr., Paul of Guyana;
  • Duncan, Randolph of Guyana;
  • Salazar Gutierrez, Manuel of Colombia;
  • Sanchez Vallejo, Yeison Andres of Colombia; and
  • Sawh, Himnauth of Guyana.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250605

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0156 and

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934316/download?inline=

 

*******

 

June 6, 2025: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated over 30 individuals and entities tied to Iranian brothers Mansour, Nasser, and Fazlolah Zarringhalam, who have collectively laundered billions of dollars through the international financial system via Iranian exchange houses and foreign front companies under their control as part of Iran’s “shadow banking” network.  The regime leverages this network to evade sanctions and move money from its oil and petrochemical sales, which help the regime fund its nuclear and missile programs and support its terrorist proxies.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Kuhi, Fatemah Sarlak of Iran;
  • Meshkat, Farahnaz of Iran;
  • Shetaban, Hossein of Iran;
  • Soltanizadeh, Parviz of Iran;
  • Zarringhalam, Fazlolah of Iran;
  • Zarringhalam, Mansour of Iran;
  • Zarringhalam, Mitra of Iran;
  • Zarringhalam, Nasser of Iran;
  • Zarringhalam, Pouria of Iran; and
  • Zhang, Yu of China.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Ace Petrochem Fze of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Bstsheh HK Limited of China;
  • Chungling HK Limited of China;
  • Fitage Limited of China;
  • Golden Pen General Trading L.L.C. of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Gutown Trade Limited of China;
  • Hero Companion Limited of China;
  • S Serenity Trading FZE of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Kimia Sadr Pasargad Company of Iran;
  • Kinlere Trading Limited of China;
  • Konosag Trading Limited of China;
  • Lastsix Trading Limited of China;
  • Magical Eagle Limited of China;
  • Mansour Zarrin Ghalam and Partners Company of Iran;
  • Marlena Trading Limited of China;
  • Moderate General Trading L.L.C. of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Nasser Zarrin Ghalam and Partners Company of Iran;
  • Plzcome Limited of China;
  • Prettyandy Trading Limited of China;
  • Profu Company Limited of China;
  • Questano HK Limited of China;
  • Saldiege Trading Limited of China;
  • Wide Vision General Trading L.L.C. of China;
  • Xia Trading Limited of China;
  • Yiminai Autoparts Trading Limited of China;
  • Zarrin Ghalam and Partners Company of Iran; and
  • Zarrin Tehran Investment Company of Iran.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0159

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250606

 

*******

 

June 9, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned Los Chapitos, a powerful faction of the Mexico-based Sinaloa Cartel that facilitates illicit fentanyl trafficking and production.  Los Chapitos-controlled laboratories are responsible for introducing fentanyl in counterfeit pills manufactured by the Sinaloa Cartel and trafficked to the United States.  Gunmen linked to the Sinaloa Cartel were also involved in the October 18, 2024 killing of former U.S. Marine Nicholas Quets in Sonora, Mexico.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Barraza Pablos, Victor Manuel of Mexico;
  • Nunez Rios, Jose Raul of Mexico; and
  • Urias Vazquez, Sheila Paola of Mexico.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Beach y Marina, S.A. DE C.V. of Mexico;
  • Carpe Diem Spa of Mexico;
  • Club Playa Real, S.A. DE C.V. of Mexico;
  • Comercializadora Copado, S.A. DE C.V. of Mexico;
  • Eco Campestres Ultra, S.A.P.I. of Mexico;
  • IMB 24 Siete, S.A. DE C.V of Mexico;
  • Los Chapitos of Mexico;
  • Mkt 24 Siete, S.A. DE C.V of Mexico;
  • Mue Renta y Venta De Vestidos of Mexico;
  • Poyecta Interna, S.A. DE C.V. of Mexico; and
  • Sea WA Beach Club, S.A. DE C.V. of Mexico.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0161 and

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250609

 

*******

 

June 10, 2025: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned five individuals, and five sham charities located abroad that are prominent financial supporters of Hamas’s Military Wing and its terrorist activities.  The individuals and entities sanctioned are responsible for funding Hamas’s Military Wing under the pretense of conducting humanitarian work, both internationally and in Gaza.  Treasury also targeted a separate fraudulent charity linked to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP).

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Abu Marei, Muhammad Sami Muhammad of Palestine;
  • Abu Rashed, Amin of the Netherlands;
  • Arawi, Zeki Abduallah Ibrahim of Turkey;
  • Brahimi, Ahmed of Algeria; and
  • Rashed, Israa Abou of the Netherlands.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Addammer Prisoner Support and Human Rights Association of Israel;
  • Al Weam Charitable Society of Northern Gaza;
  • Associazone Benefica La Cupola D’oro of Italy;
  • El Baraka Association For Charitable and Humanitarian Work of Algeria;
  • Filistin Vakfi of Turkey; and
  • Israa Charitable Foundation Netherlands of the Netherlands.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250610

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0162

 

*******

 

June 12, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has assessed a $215,988,868 civil monetary penalty against GVA Capital Ltd. of San Francisco, California for violations of OFAC's sanctions against Russia and for related reporting obligations. GVA Capital knowingly managed an investment for sanctioned Russian oligarch Suleiman Kerimov while aware of his blocked status. GVA Capital also failed to comply with an OFAC subpoena during OFAC's investigation into this matter.

 

The penalty amount reflects OFAC's determination that GVA Capital's conduct was egregious and not voluntarily self-disclosed.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250612

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934366/download?inline

 

*******

 

June 12, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) made the following additions to its SDN list.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Huthele, Nasr Mohsen Ali of Iraq.

 

The following entity has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Kata’ib Al-Imam Ali of Iraq.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250612

 

*******

 

June 16, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced a $3,882,797 settlement with Unicat Catalyst Technologies, LLC (“Unicat”). Unicat, an Alvin, Texas-based company that sells catalyst products, has agreed to settle its potential civil liability for 13 apparent violations of the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations (ITSR), and one apparent violation of the Venezuela Sanctions Regulations (VSR) that arose from its provision of catalyst products and consulting services to Iran and its sale of catalysts to a blocked Venezuelan entity. The settlement amount reflects OFAC’s determination that Unicat’s conduct was voluntarily self-disclosed and constituted an egregious case.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934376/download?inline and

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934381/download?inline

 

*******

 

June 18, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned five Mexico-based leaders of Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion (CJNG).  CJNG is a brutally violent cartel responsible for a significant share of fentanyl and other illicit drugs entering the United States.  It uses murder as a tactic to intimidate rivals, including sending messages to other cartels through the targeted killings of women.  The recent discovery of a CJNG recruitment camp, Izaguirre ranch—which was reportedly used to execute recruits that defy instructions—underscores the cartel’s brutal methods.

 

The following individual has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Ruiz Velasco, Ricardo of Mexico.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250618

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0169

 

*******

 

June 20, 2025: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued Venezuela General License 5S – Authorizing Certain Transactions Related to the Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. 2020 8.5 Percent Bond on or After December 20, 2025.

 

GENERAL LICENSE NO. 5S: “Authorizing Certain Transactions Related to the  Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. 2020 8.5 Percent Bond on or After December 20, 2025”

 

  • On or after December 20, 2025, all transactions related to, the provision of financing for, and other dealings in the Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. 2020 8.5 Percent Bond that would be prohibited by subsection l(a)(iii) of Executive Order (E.O.) 13835 of May 21, 2018, as amended by E.O. 13857 of January 25, 2019, and incorporated into the Venezuela Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 591 (the VSR), are authorized.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934391/download?inline

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934391/download?inline

 

*******

 

June 20, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) took its single largest action to date against Iran-backed Ansarallah, commonly known as the Houthis, targeting four individuals, 12 entities, and two vessels that have imported oil and other illicit goods in support of the terrorist group.  This action includes Houthi front companies, their owners, and other key Houthi operatives that generate significant revenue for the group through the sale of oil and other commodities on Yemen’s black market and by engaging in smuggling operations through Houthi-controlled ports.  As part of this action, Treasury is also targeting two vessels, as well as their owners and operators, which violated U.S. sanctions by discharging oil derivatives to the Houthis.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Al-Washli, Zaid of Yemen;
  • Dabbash, Abdullah Ahsan Abdullah of Yemen;
  • Daghsan, Daghsan Ahmed of Yemen; and
  • Talea, Ali Ahmed Daghsan of Yemen.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Abbot Trading Co., Ltd. of Yemen;
  • Atlantis M. Shipping Co of the Marshall Islands:
  • Azzahra Establishment for Commerce and Agencies of Yemen;
  • Best Way Tanker Corp of Moldova;
  • Black Diamond Petroleum Derivatives of Yemen;
  • Gasoline Aman Company For Oil Derivatives Imports of Yemen;
  • Ocean Voyage LLC of Azerbaijan;
  • Royal Plus Shipping Services and Commercial Agencies of Yemen;
  • Star Plus Yemen Trading Limited of Yemen;
  • Tamco Establishment for Oil Derivatives of Yemen;
  • Yahya Al-Usalli Company for Import Limited of Yemen; and
  • Yemen Elaph Petroleum Derivatives Import of Yemen.

 

The following vessels have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Atlantis MZ (D604003) Crude Oil Tanker Unknown flag; Former Vessel Flag Comoros; MMSI 620800003 (vessel); and
  • Valente (T8A4170) Crude Oil Tanker Palau flag; MMSI 511100949 (vessel).

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250620 and

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0174

 

*******

 

June 20, 2025: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated one individual and eight entities, and identifying one vessel as blocked property, for their involvement in the procurement and transshipment of sensitive machinery for Iran’s defense industry.  The vessel, SHUN KAI XING, owned by Hong Kong-based Unico Shipping Co Ltd, was carrying this machinery for OFAC-designated Rayan Roshd Afzar Company (RRA) and Towse Sanaye Nim Resanaye Tarashe, a company controlled by RRA executives.  This action is being taken in furtherance of National Security Presidential Memorandum-2, which directs that Iran be denied the development of missiles and other weapons capabilities and that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and its surrogates be disrupted, degraded, or denied access to the resources that sustain their destabilizing activities.

 

The following individual has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Zhang, Yanbing of China.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Athena Shipping Co Ltd of China;
  • Dongguan Zanyin Machinery and Equipment Co Ltd of China;
  • Edisa Dis Ticaret Limited Sirketi of Turkey;
  • Futech Co Ltd of China;
  • Shenzhen Xinxin Shipping Co Ltd of China;
  • Towse Sanaye Nim Resanaye Tarashe of Iran;
  • Unico Shipping Co Ltd of China; and
  • V-shipping Pte Ltd of Singapore.

 

The following vessel has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Shun Kai Xing (3E5884) Bulk Carrier Panama flag; MMSI 352003792 (vessel)

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250620 and

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0175

 

******

 

June 24, 2025: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned Giovanni Vicente Mosquera Serrano (Mosquera Serrano), a fugitive leader of Tren de Aragua (TdA) who is involved in the organization’s drug trafficking and financial operations.  TdA is a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) of Venezuelan origin that has launched a campaign of terror throughout the Western Hemisphere, including in the United States, and continues to expand.  TdA is involved in illicit drug trade, human smuggling and trafficking, extortion, sexual exploitation of women and children, and money laundering, among other criminal activities.

 

The following individual has been added to OFAC’s DN List:

 

  • Mosquera Serrano, Giovanni Vicente of Venezuela.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0178 and

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250624

 

******

 

June 27, 2025:  The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued Russia-related General License 115B, "Authorizing Certain Transactions Related to Civil Nuclear Energy."

 

In addition, OFAC invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on a proposed information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. OFAC is soliciting comments concerning a proposal to add an electronic Sanctions Reconsideration Portal information collection within OFAC’s Reporting, Procedures and Penalties Regulations. This notice is currently available with the Federal Register. Written comments must be received by August 25, 2025, to be assured of consideration.

 

GENERAL LICENSE NO. 115B: “Authorizing Certain Transactions Related to Civil Nuclear Energy”

 

(a) All transactions prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 involving one or more of the following entities that are related to civil nuclear energy are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time, December 19, 2025:

 

(1) Gazprombank Joint Stock Company;

(2) State Corporation Bank for Development and Foreign Economic Affairs Vnesheconombank;

(3) Public Joint Stock Company Bank Financial Corporation Otkritie;

(4) Sovcombank Open Joint Stock Company;

(5) Public Joint Stock Company Sberbank of Russia;

(6) VTB Bank Public Joint Stock Company;

(7) Joint Stock Company Alfa-Bank;

(8) Public Joint Stock Company Rosbank;

(9) Bank Zenit Public Joint Stock Company;

(10) Bank Saint-Petersburg Public Joint Stock Company;

(11) National Clearing Center (NCC);

(12) Any entity in which one or more of the above persons own, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest; or

(13) the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.

 

(b)For the purposes of this general license, the term “related to civil nuclear energy” means transactions undertaken solely to maintain or support civil nuclear projects initiated before November 21, 2024.

 

Additionally, OFAC has updated several Russia-related Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ 966, FAQ 967, FAQ 978, FAQ 999, FAQ 1010, FAQ 1011, FAQ 1117, FAQ 1182, FAQ 1203, and FAQ 1216).

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/934396/download?inline

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250627

 

******

 

June 30, 2025: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)  took action to implement the President’s Executive Order (E.O.) of June 30, 2025, “Providing for the Revocation of Syria Sanctions,” removing U.S. sanctions on Syria in support of the Syrian people and their new government as they rebuild their country and have the opportunity to become a stable and prosperous nation at peace with itself and its neighbors.  This E.O. revokes the Executive orders that previously placed comprehensive sanctions on Syria.  The E.O. also ensures continued accountability for the Bashar al-Assad regime, expanding the national emergency declared in E.O. 13894 to allow for the continuation of sanctions against Bashar al-Assad, his associates, and other destabilizing regional actors.

 

On June 30, the President issued an Executive Order "Providing for the Revocation of Syria Sanctions" that removes U.S. sanctions on Syria, effective July 1, 2025. To implement the President's action, the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has issued four new Syria Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs 1220-1223).

 

FAQ 1220:

 

Q: How does the Executive Order (E.O.) of June 30, 2025, "Providing for the Revocation of Syria Sanctions," affect OFAC's Syria Sanctions Program?

 

A: The E.O. of June 30, 2025 removes sanctions on Syria, effective July 1, 2025, while maintaining sanctions on Bashar al-Assad and certain other destabilizing regional actors. Specifically, the E.O. revokes the following six E.O.s that form the foundation of the Syrian Sanctions Program and terminates the national emergency underlying those E.O.s, effective July 1, 2025:

 

  • E.O. 13338 of May 11, 2004;
  • E.O. 13399 of April 25, 2006;
  • E.O. 13460 of February 13, 2008;
  • E.O. 13572 of April 29, 2011;
  • E.O. 13573 of May 18, 2011; and
  • E.O. 13582 of August 17, 2011.

 

As a result, as of July 1, 2025, the economic sanctions administered by OFAC that constitute the Syria Sanctions Program are no longer in effect. Persons blocked solely pursuant to these above E.O.s were removed from OFAC's List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN List), and all property and interests in property of such persons are unblocked. OFAC will remove the Syrian Sanctions Regulations from the Code of Federal Regulations. Pending or future OFAC investigations or enforcement actions related to apparent violations of the Syrian Sanctions Regulations that occurred prior to July 1, 2025 may still be carried out.

 

Additionally, the E.O. of June 30, 2025 also preserves and expands OFAC's ability to target Bashar al-Assad and his associates, human rights abusers, captagon drug traffickers, and other destabilizing regional actors by further amending E.O. 13894. Concurrently with the issuance of the E.O. of June 30, 2025, OFAC designated 139 persons who were previously designated under the Syrian Sanctions Program under E.O. 13894, as further amended, or other OFAC authorities.

 

FAQ 1221:

 

Q: Can U.S. financial institutions establish relationships with Syrian financial institutions, including the Central Bank of Syria?

 

A: Yes. All Syrian financial institutions, including the Central Bank of Syria, have been removed from OFAC's List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN List).

 

Effective July 1, 2025, U.S. persons are not prohibited from providing financial services to Syria, processing payments on behalf of third country financial institutions involving Syrian financial institutions, or conducting transactions with the new Government of Syria and Syrian financial institutions, provided that none of the involved parties are on the SDN List. This includes establishing correspondent banking relationships with Syrian financial institutions. In line with the lifting of Syria sanctions, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network issued exceptive relief in late May 2025 to permit U.S. financial institutions to open and maintain correspondent accounts for the Commercial Bank of Syria. OFAC strongly encourages financial institutions to employ a risk-based sanctions compliance program and update it as appropriate in consideration of new business lines.

 

FAQ 1222:

 

Q: Do I need a specific license from OFAC to export or reexport food or medicine to Syria?

 

A: No. The United States no longer maintains comprehensive sanctions on Syria, effective July 1, 2025, following the issuance of the E.O. of June 30, 2025. You may send U.S.-origin food or medicine to Syria without a specific license from OFAC.

 

Furthermore, the Department of Commerce maintains jurisdiction over the export of most items to Syria. In the E.O. of June 30, 2025, the President waived requirements to impose certain export controls under the Syria Accountability and Lebanese Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2003 and the Chemical and Biological Weapons Control and Warfare Elimination Act of 1991. Please refer to the Department of Commerce for more specifics on export controls involving Syria.

 

FAQ 1223:

 

Q: Can persons continue to rely on Syria General License (GL) 25 after the revocation of the Syrian Sanctions Program, on July 1, 2025?

 

A: Yes. While Syria GL 25 authorizes transactions otherwise prohibited under the Syrian Sanctions Regulations, it also authorizes transactions involving specified persons otherwise prohibited by certain other sanctions programs. To the extent necessary, persons may continue to rely on GL 25 and the related Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs).

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0183 and

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250630

 

******

 

The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) published regulations to implement Executive Order 14203 of February 26, 2025, "Imposing Sanctions on the International Criminal Court ." These regulations are currently available for public inspection with the Federal Register and will take effect upon publication in the Federal Register on July 1, 2025.

 

https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250630_33

JUNE 2025 EXPORT CONTROLS AND COMPLIANCE UPDATES Read More »