Sign up now for our fall ITAR Export Traning Webinars & Workshops!
More Information about our Training Webinars & Workshops

FEBRUARY 2023 EXPORT CONTROL REGULATION UPDATES

This newsletter is a listing of the latest changes in export control regulations through February 28, 2023.  The newsletter is provided as a complimentary service to assist exporters with their ITAR and EAR export compliance responsibilities.  It provides a summary of recent changes to export control regulations or other regulatory matters of interest that may impact your company’s international trade and export compliance functions. Call us at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net with questions or comments.

 

See also our “Latest Sanctions Fines & Penalties” section below for an update on companies and persons denied export privileges by the United States Government.

 

REGULATORY UPDATES

 

President

 

President Biden Continued The National Emergency Regarding Afghanistan

 

February 3, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 7837: In accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), President Biden has continued for one year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 14064 with respect to the widespread humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan and the potential for a deepening economic collapse in Afghanistan.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/07/2023-02671/continuation-of-the-national-emergency-with-respect-to-the-widespread-humanitarian-crisis-in

 

Note: Afghanistan continues to remain an arms embargoed country under the ITAR.

 

*******

 

President Biden Continued The National Emergency Regarding Burma (Myanmar)

 

February 3, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 8205: In accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), President Biden has continued for one year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 14014 with respect to the situation in and in relation to Burma.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/07/2023-02770/continuation-of-the-national-emergency-with-respect-to-the-situation-in-and-in-relation-to-burma

 

Note: Burma aka Myanmar, continues to remain an Arms Embargoed country under the ITAR

 

*******

 

President Biden Continued The National Emergency Regarding Cuba

 

February 21, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 10821: In accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), President Biden has continued the national emergency with respect to Cuba and the emergency authority relating to the regulation of the anchorage and movement of vessels set out in Proclamation 6867 of March 1, 1996, as amended by Proclamation 7757 of February 26, 2004, Proclamation 9398 of February 24, 2016, and Proclamation 9699 of February 22, 2018.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/21/2023-03746/continuation-of-the-national-emergency-with-respect-to-cuba-and-of-the-emergency-authority-relating

 

Note: Cuba continues to be an arms-embargoed country under the ITAR and is subject to associated sanctions under the EAR and economic sanctions under the Office of Foreign Assets Controls

 

*******

 

President Biden Continued The National Emergency Regarding Libya

 

February 21, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 10823: In accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), President Biden has continued for one year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13566 of February 25, 2011, and expanded in Executive Order 13726 of April 19, 2016.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/21/2023-03747/continuation-of-the-national-emergency-with-respect-to-libya

 

Note: Libya continues to be an arms embargo country under the ITAR

 

*******

 

President Biden And The White House Have Issued A Memorandum On the United States Conventional Arms Transfer Policy

 

February 23, 2023: President Biden and the White House has issued a Memorandum on the United States Conventional Arms Transfer (CAT) Policy, a key guidance document building on the October 2022 National Security Strategy that articulates the framework under which U.S. government agencies review and evaluate proposed arms transfers to allies and partners worldwide. The CAT Policy reflects the Biden-Harris Administration’s foreign policy vision and priorities of prevailing in an era of complex strategic competition by leading with diplomacy, renewing alliances, elevating human rights, and delivering for the American people through support and advocacy for U.S. industry. Under the Biden-Harris Administration’s revised CAT Policy, the United States will exercise restraint and promote norms and controls for the responsible international transfer of conventional arms. The United States will continue considering arms transfers on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the full spectrum of U.S. foreign policy and national security interests. In an increasingly competitive market, the U.S. Government will promote transfers when they are in the U.S. national interest, in line with the considerations of the CAT Policy, applicable export control laws and regulations, and consistent with defense trade advocacy procedures.

 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2023/02/23/memorandum-on-united-states-conventional-arms-transfer-policy/

 

*******

 

President Biden Raised Tariffs On Certain Russian Products

 

February 24, 2023: President Biden raised tariffs on certain Russian products imported to the United States, building on previous efforts to strip Russia of its international trade privileges. These measures are designed to target key Russian commodities generating revenue for the Kremlin while reducing U.S. reliance on Russia. These measures are carefully calibrated to impose costs on Russia while minimizing costs to U.S. consumers. This action will result in increased tariffs on more than 100 Russian metals, minerals, and chemical products worth approximately $2.8 billion to Russia. It will also significantly increase costs for aluminum that was smelted or cast in Russia to enter the U.S. market in order to counter harm to the domestic aluminum industry, which is being squeezed by energy costs as a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/02/24/fact-sheet-on-one-year-anniversary-of-russias-invasion-of-ukraine-biden-administration-announces-actions-to-support-ukraine-and-hold-russia-accountable/

 

*******

 

Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC)

 

Department of State Responds To Public Comments On Interim Final Rule Regarding Reorganization of ITAR Part 120 And Made Minor Amendments

 

February 27, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 12210: The Department of State published an interim final rule on March 23, 2022, effective September 6, 2022, amending the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) to better organize the purposes and definitions of the regulations. After reviewing the comments received in response to that interim final rule, the Department is now responding to public comments and finalizing the interim final rule, including making minor amendments to 22 CFR §§ 120.13(registration)  and 120.40 (compositional items). This rule is effective February 27, 2023.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/27/2023-03828/international-traffic-in-arms-regulations-consolidation-and-restructuring-of-purposes-and

 

*******

 

DDTC Name And Address Changes Posted To Website

 

February 1 through 27, 2023: The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) posted the following name and/or address changes on its website at    

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_kb_article_page&sys_id=bd72ca0adbf8d30044f9ff621f961981:

 

  • Change in Address from General Dynamics United Kingdom Limited at Units 3&4 Bryn Brithdir, Oakdale Business Park, Blackwood NP12 4AA to Units 1&3 Bryn Brithdir, Oakdale Business Park, Blackwood NP12 4AD;
  • Change in Address from Raytheon Technologies Corporation at 870 Winter Street, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451 to 1000 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 22209;
  • Change in Names from Zenetex LLC, Delex Systems and V2X, Inc., to Vectrus Systems Corporation due to dissolution;
  • Change in Address from Kokusai AeroMarine Co., Ltd. at 5-2, 2-Chome NishiShinbashi, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, 105-0003 Japan to 10-6, 1-Chome, Shinbashi, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, 105-0004 Japan;
  • Change in Name from Harris Global Communications Inc. to L3Harris Global Communications Inc., due to merger;
  • Change in Name from Pilatus Defence Solutions Australia Pty Ltd to Pilatus Training Solutions Australia Pty Ltd. due to corporate rebranding;
  • Change in Name from Raytheon Technical Services International Company to Vertex Technical Services International Company due to acquisition;
  • Change in Name from Colt Defense LLC to Colt’s Manufacturing Company LLC due to dissolution;
  • Change in Name from umlaut SARL to umlaut SAS due to change in corporate structure;

 

*******

 

The Department Of State Designates Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan, Hizbul Mujahideen, And Army of Islam (And Other Aliases) As Foreign Terrorist Organizations

 

February 16, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 10171: Based on a review of the Administrative Records assembled pursuant to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C))(“INA”), and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, Secretary of State Antony Blinken has concluded that the circumstances that were the bases for the designations of Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan, Hizbul Mujahideen, and Army of Islam (and Other Aliases) as Foreign Terrorist Organizations have not changed in such a manner as to warrant revocation of the designations and that the national security of the United States does not warrant a revocation of the designations.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/16/2023-03255/review-of-the-designations-as-foreign-terrorist-organizations-of-tehrik-e-taliban-pakistan-hizbul

 

*******

 

U.S. Department of Commerce and U.S. Department of Justice

 

The Department Of Justice And The Department Of Commerce Are Launching The Disruptive Technology Strike Force

 

February 16, 2023: The Department of Justice and the Department of Commerce are launching the Disruptive Technology Strike Force. Under the leadership of the Justice Department’s National Security Division and the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), the strike force will bring together experts throughout government – including the FBI, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and 14 U.S. Attorneys’ Offices in 12 metropolitan regions across the country – to target illicit actors, strengthen supply chains and protect critical technological assets from being acquired or used by nation-state adversaries.

 

The strike force will be co-led by Assistant Attorney General Matthew G. Olsen of the Justice Department’s National Security Division and Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement Matthew Axelrod of the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security.

 

When acquired by nation-state adversaries such as the People’s Republic of China, Iran, Russia, and North Korea, advanced technologies can be used in new or novel ways to enhance their military capabilities or support mass surveillance programs that enable human rights abuses. End users of national security concern seek technologies, including those related to supercomputing and exascale computing, artificial intelligence, advanced manufacturing equipment and materials, quantum computing, and biosciences. Although they have important commercial uses, technologies in these fields can threaten U.S. national security when used by adversaries for disruptive purposes, such as improving calculations in weapons design and testing; improving the speed and accuracy of military or intelligence decision-making; and breaking or developing unbreakable encryption algorithms that protect sensitive communications and classified information.

 

The strike force’s work will focus on investigating and prosecuting criminal violations of export laws; enhancing administrative enforcement of U.S. export controls; fostering partnerships with the private sector; leveraging international partnerships to coordinate law enforcement actions and disruption strategies; utilizing advanced data analytics and all-source intelligence to develop and build investigations; conducting regular training for field offices; and strengthening connectivity between the strike force and the Intelligence Community.

 

The strike force will operate in 12 metropolitan regions across the United States, with oversight and support from the local U.S. Attorneys’ Offices in Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, New York City (Southern and Eastern Districts of New York), San Jose, Calif., Phoenix, Portland, Ore., and the Washington, D.C. region (District of Columbia and the Eastern District of Virginia).

 

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/about-bis/newsroom/press-releases/3222-distruptive-tech-strike-force/file

 

Department of Commerce – Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

 

BIS Published A Report On The Effect Of Imports Of Neodymium-Iron-Boron (Ndfeb) Permanent Magnets On The National Security Of The United States

 

February 14, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 9430:  The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published a report that summarizes the findings of an investigation conducted by the U.S. Department of Commerce (the “Department”) pursuant to section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended (“section 232”), into the effect of imports of neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) permanent magnets on the national security of the United States. This report was completed in June 2022 and posted on the BIS website in September 2022. BIS has not published the appendices to the report in this notification of report findings, but they are available online at the BIS website, along with the rest of the report.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/14/2023-03078/publication-of-a-report-on-the-effect-of-imports-of-neodymium-iron-boron-ndfeb-permanent-magnets-on and https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/section-232-investigations/3141-report-1/file and https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/section-232-investigations/3142-2022-09-fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-announces-actions-to-secure-rare-earth-element/file

 

*******

 

BIS Seeks Comments On Licensing Procedures For The Export And Reexport Of Agricultural Commodities To Cuba

 

February 17, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 10286: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is requesting public comments on the effectiveness of its licensing procedures as defined in the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) for the export and reexport of agricultural commodities to Cuba. BIS will include a description of any comments it receives in its biennial report to Congress, as required by the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000, as amended (TSRA). Comments must be received by March 20, 2023.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/17/2023-03359/effectiveness-of-licensing-procedures-for-the-export-and-reexport-of-agricultural-commodities-to

 

*******

 

BIS Expedites Processing Of Export License Applications For Items Needed To Aid Survivors Of Turkish/Syria Earthquake

 

February 17, 2023:  In response to the devastating earthquake on February 6, 2023, that has heavily impacted Türkiye and Syria, the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has expedited the processing of export license applications for items needed to aid survivors. These export and reexport license requirements should not prevent or otherwise impede the shipment of aid and recovery-related items intended directly for the Syrian people or through nongovernmental humanitarian organizations (NGOs) in-country, including in areas under the control of the Assad regime and non-state actors. Examples of items eligible for expedited licensing include heavy equipment, telecommunications hardware and software, portable generators and other power generation equipment, medical devices, water purification and sanitation equipment, and shelter materials.

 

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/about-bis/newsroom/press-releases/3224-2022-02-17-bis-press-release-turkiye-syria-earthquake-relief-support/file

 

*******

BIS Updates the EAR Pursuant To Wassenaar Arrangement Meetings In December of 2021.

 

February 24, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 12108: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) maintains, as part of its Export Administration Regulations (EAR), the Commerce Control List (CCL), which identifies certain items subject to Department of Commerce jurisdiction. During the December 2021 Wassenaar Arrangement on Export Controls for Conventional Arms and Dual-Use Goods and Technologies (WA) Plenary meeting, Participating States of the WA (Participating State) made certain decisions affecting the WA control lists, which BIS is now implementing via amendments to the CCL. On August 15, 2022, BIS published a final rule that implemented some of these decisions by adding to the CCL four technologies that met the criteria for emerging or foundational technologies under Section 1758 of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (ECRA). These technologies are two substrates of ultra-wide bandgap semiconductors (Gallium Oxide (Ga2 O3) and diamond), Electronic Computer Aided Design (ECAD) software specially designed for the development of integrated circuits with any Gate-All-Around Field-Effect Transistor (GAAFET) structure, and pressure gain combustion (PGC) technology for the production and development of gas turbine engine components or systems. This final rule implements the remaining controls agreed to during the December 2021 WA Plenary meeting by revising the CCL, as well as certain EAR provisions, including License Exception Adjusted Peak Performance (APP). This final rule also makes corrections to align the scope of Significant Item (SI) license requirements throughout the EAR and makes a revision to License Exception Strategic Trade Authorization (STA). This rule is effective February 24, 2023.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/24/2023-03683/implementation-of-2021-wassenaar-arrangement-decisions

 

Department of Treasury

 

CFIUS Committee Published Determinations That New Zealand And The United Kingdom Have Established And Are Effectively Controlling Investment Security, Allowing Them To Be Deemed An Excepted Foreign State

 

February 13, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 9190: The Department of the Treasury, as Chair of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, has published the Committee's determinations that New Zealand and the United Kingdom have established and are effectively utilizing a robust process to analyze foreign investments for national security risks and to facilitate coordination with the United States on matters relating to investment security. This determination satisfies the second criterion in the definition of an excepted foreign state under 31 CFR 800.218 with respect to New Zealand and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Therefore, New Zealand and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland are and will remain excepted foreign states absent further Committee action and notice in the Federal Register. These determinations are effective February 10, 2023.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/13/2023-02533/determination-regarding-excepted-foreign-states

 

*******

 

 

Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

 

OFAC Publishes Fact Sheet “Disrupting And Degrading – One Year Of U.S. Sanctions On Russia And Its Enablers”

 

February 24, 2023: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) published a fact sheet titled, “Disrupting and Degrading – One Year of U.S. Sanctions on Russia and Its Enablers.” This fact sheet summarizes the actions that OFAC and U.S. allies have taken to make it harder and costlier for the Kremlin to obtain the capital, materials, technology, and support it needs to sustain its war of aggression.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1298

 

*******

 

OFAC Issued A Humanitarian Assistance Fact Sheet

 

February 27, 2023: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued a humanitarian assistance fact sheet, Supplemental Guidance for the Provision of Humanitarian Assistance. This 2023 fact sheet supplements OFAC’s 2014 Guidance Related to the Provision of Humanitarian Assistance by Not-for-Profit Non-Governmental Organizations. OFAC issued this 2023 Fact Sheet to provide guidance on the reach of economic sanctions for persons involved in the conduct of humanitarian-related activities, including the U.S. government (USG); international organizations and entities (IOs); nongovernmental organizations (NGOs); persons involved in the provision of food, other agricultural commodities, medicine, and medical devices (Ag-Med); and financial institutions and other service providers who support or facilitate transactions for such persons.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/supplemental_ngo_humanitarian.pdf and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/ngo_humanitarian.pdf

 

*******

 

U.S. Census Bureau

 

Tips on How to Resolve AES Response Messages

 

February 16, 2023:  Census published the following tip:

When a shipment is filed to the AES, a system response message is generated and indicates whether the shipment has been accepted or rejected.  If the shipment is accepted, the AES filer receives an Internal Transaction Number (ITN) as confirmation.  Though the shipment is accepted, the filer may still receive a Verify Message, Compliance Alert, Informational Message, or Warning Message along with their ITN.  However, if the shipment is rejected, a Fatal Error notification is received and must be corrected to receive a valid ITN.

 

To help you take the appropriate action for the different AES Response Messages, here are some tips on how to address the most frequent messages that were generated in AES for this month.

 

Response Code:  512

Narrative: ECCN Missing

Severity: Fatal

Reason: The License Code/License Exemption Code requires an Export Control Classification Number (ECCN), but it was not reported.

 

Resolution: The License Code/License Exemption Code requires the reporting of an ECCN. See ‘Appendix F – License and License Exemption Type Codes’ and reporting guidelines.

Verify the License Code/License Exemption Code requirements, correct the shipment, and resubmit.

 

Response Code:  8W1

Narrative: Shipping Weight/Quantity 1 Out of Range

Severity: Verify

Reason: For the reported Schedule B/HTS Number, the Shipping Weight/Quantity (1) ratio is outside of the expected range.

 

Resolution: For a particular Schedule B/HTS Number reported, the shipping weight divided by the first quantity should fall within a certain parameter based on historical statistical averages for that commodity.  Ratios outside this pre-determined parameter might indicate either a keying error or misclassification of the product. Verify the Shipping Weight, Quantity 1, and Schedule B/HTS Number, correct the shipment and resubmit (if necessary).  If the line item is verified correctly as reported, no action is necessary.

 

U.S. Department of Defense

 

DSCA Notifies Congress Of Potential FMS Sale To Poland

 

February 7, 2023: The U.S. Department of Defense's Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) has notified Congress that the Republic of Poland has requested to buy eighteen (18) M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) launchers; four hundred sixty-eight (468) HIMARS Launcher Loader Module kits; forty-five (45) M57 Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS); four hundred sixty-one (461) M30A2 Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System Alternative Warhead (GMLRS-AW) pods with Insensitive Munitions Propulsion System (IMPS); five hundred twenty-one (521) M31A2 Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System Unitary (GMLRS-U) pods with Insensitive Munitions Propulsion System (IMPS); and five hundred thirty-two (532) XM403 Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System Extended Range Alternative Warhead (GMLRS-ER AW) pods. Also included are Low Cost Reduced Range Practice Rockets; support equipment; communications equipment; spare and repair parts; test sets; batteries; laptop computers; publications and technical data; facility design; personnel training and equipment; systems integration support; Quality Assurance Teams and a Technical Assistance Fielding Team; United States Government and contractor engineering and logistics personnel services; training; sensors; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The total estimated cost is $10 billion.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/press-media/major-arms-sales/poland-high-mobility-artillery-rocket-system-himars-0

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress Of Potential FMS Sale To Singapore

 

February 9, 2023: The U.S. Department of Defense's Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) has notified Congress that the Government of Singapore has requested to buy one hundred (100) KMU-556 Tail Kits for Joint Direct-Attack Munition (JDAM) GBU-31; nine hundred (900) KMU-572 Tail Kits for JDAM GBU-38 and Laser JDAM GBU-54; two hundred fifty (250) MAU-169 Computer Control Group for 500lb Paveway-II (PWII) GBU-12; and two hundred fifty (250) MXU-650 Air Foil Group for 500lb PWII GBU-12.  Also included are DSU-38 laser guidance sets; Common Munitions Built-In-Test (BIT)/Reprogramming Equipment (CMBRE); spare parts, consumables, and accessories, and repair and return support; aircraft and munitions support and support equipment; personnel training and training equipment; unclassified software; unclassified technical books and other publications; U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical and logistics support services, studies and surveys; and other related elements of logistical and program support.  The estimated total cost is $55 million.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/press-media/major-arms-sales/singapore-air-ground-munitions-kits-and-services

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress Of Potential FMS Sale To Kuwait

 

February 14, 2023: The U.S. Department of Defense's Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) has notified Congress that the Government of Kuwait has requested to buy planning, integration, implementation, and maintenance of a Medical Information System for its Kuwait Military Medical Command (KMMC) that consists of Health Information Systems Information Technology (IT) hardware and software, IT infrastructure, implementation of life-cycle management practices, training, maintenance, support, and warranty services, along with U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical and logistics support services; and other related elements of logistical and program support. The estimated total cost is $250 million.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/press-media/major-arms-sales/kuwait-medical-information-system-kuwait-military-medical-command-kmmc

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress Of Potential FMS Sale To The Netherlands

 

February 16, 2023: The U.S. Department of Defense's Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) has notified Congress that the Government of The Netherlands has requested a possible purchase of twenty (20) M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) launchers; thirty-nine (39) M30A2 Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS) Alternative Warhead (AW) Missile Pods with Insensitive Munitions Propulsion System (IMPS); thirty-eight (38) M31A2 GMLRS Unitary (GMLRS-U) High Explosive (HE) Missile Pods with IMPS; eighty (80) M57 Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) Missile Pods; and seventeen (17) M1152A1 High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicles (HMMWVs). Also included are M28A2 Reduced Range Practice Rocket (RRPR) pods; radios with similar “SINCGARS” capability, including vehicular dual long-range radio systems w/GPS; single radio, long range vehicular system w/GPS; High Frequency/VHF radios; M1084A2 cargo trucks, Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles (FMTVs) Resupply Vehicles (RSVs); M1089A2 wrecker truck, FMTVs; M1095 5-ton trailer FMTVs; Simple Key Loaders (SKLs), AN/PYQ-10; Defense Advanced Global Positioning System Receivers (DAGRs); machine gun mounts; battle management systems, Vehicle Integration Kits, ruggedized laptops, and training equipment publications for HIMARS and munitions; camouflage screen and support systems; support equipment; communications equipment; spare and repair parts; test sets; training and training equipment; publications; systems integration support; technical data; Stockpile Reliability, Quality Assurance and Technical Assistance teams; U.S. Government and contractor technical, engineering, and logistics support services; and other related elements of logistical and program support. The total estimated cost is $670 million. The principal contractor will be Lockheed Martin, Grand Prairie, TX. There are no known offset agreements proposed in connection with this potential sale.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/press-media/major-arms-sales/netherlands-m142-high-mobility-artillery-rocket-system-himars

 

*******

 

DSCA Notifies Congress Of Potential FMS Sale To Australia

 

February 28, 2023: The U.S. Department of Defense's Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) has notified Congress that the Government of Australia has requested to buy up to sixty-three (63) Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missiles-Extended Range (AARGM-ERs); and up to twenty (20) AARGM-ER Captive Air Training Missiles (CATMs). Also included are AGM-88G Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile-Extended Range Dummy Air Training Missiles (AARGM-ER DATMs), containers, component parts, and support equipment; Repair of Repairables; software (Classified and Unclassified); publications (Classified and Unclassified); training (Classified and Unclassified); transportation; U.S. Government and Contractor engineering support; and other related elements of logistical and program support. The estimated total cost is $506 million. The prime U.S. contractor will be the Javelin Joint Venture between Lockheed Martin in Orlando, FL, and Raytheon Missiles and Defense in Tucson, AZ. There are no known offset agreements proposed in connection with this potential sale.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/major-arms-sales/archive-date/202302

 

 

 

LATEST SANCTIONS FINES & PENALTIES

 

This section of our newsletter provides information on the latest sanctions, fines, and penalties for export violations or matters of non-compliance with the ITAR or EAR issued by the US government enforcement agencies. It is provided as a service to exporters and associates of FD Associates to remind them of the importance of extreme due diligence in all international trade and export compliance matters, particularly those involving exports subject to the ITAR or the EAR. Don't let this happen to you or your company! Call us with questions or concerns at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net.

 

Sanctions

 

Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

 

February 1, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 6621: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) amended the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by adding seven entities to the Entity List. These seven entities, listed under the destination of Iran, have been determined by the U.S. Government to be acting contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States for contributing to Russia's military and defense industrial base. They are being added to the Entity List with the application of the Russia/Belarus-Military End User Foreign Direct Product rule.

 

  • Design and Manufacturing of Aircraft Engines (DAMA);
  • Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Aerospace Force;
  • Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Research and Self-Sufficiency Jihad Organization;
  • Oje Parvaz Mado Nafar Company;
  • Paravar Pars Company;
  • Qods Aviation Industry; and
  • Shahed Aviation Industries.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/01/2023-02130/additions-to-the-entity-list

 

*******

 

February 14, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 9389: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) amended the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by adding six entities to the Entity List, under the destination of the People's Republic of China (China). These six entities have been determined by the U.S. Government to be acting contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States.

 

These entities are being added for their support to China's military modernization efforts, specifically the People's Liberation Army's (PLA) aerospace programs, including airships and balloons and related materials and components. The PLA utilizes High Altitude Balloons (HAB) for intelligence and reconnaissance activities. This activity is contrary to U.S. national security and foreign policy interests under § 744.11 of the EAR. For these six entities, BIS imposes a license requirement for all items subject to the EAR and will review license applications under a presumption of denial.

 

The following entities have been added to the Entity List:

 

  • Beijing Nanjiang Aerospace Technology Co., Ltd.;
  • China Electronics Technology Group Corporation 48th Research Institute;
  • Dongguan Lingkong Remote Sensing Technology Co., Ltd.;
  • Eagles Men Aviation Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd. (EMAST);
  • Guangzhou Tian-Hai-Xiang Aviation Technology Co., Ltd.; and
  • Shanxi Eagles Men Aviation Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/14/2023-03193/additions-to-the-entity-list

 

*******

 

February 27, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 12175: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) revised the EAR to enhance and strengthen the existing sanctions against Russia and Belarus by expanding the scope of the Russian and Belarusian industry sector sanctions and the `luxury goods' sanctions to better align them with the controls that have been implemented by U.S. allies and partners imposing substantially similar controls on Russia and Belarus. For similar policy reasons, this rule also refines other existing controls on Russia and Belarus that were imposed in response to the February 2022 further invasion of Ukraine. The regulatory changes include:

  • Revisions to the sanctions under Supplement No. 2 to EAR Part 746 to make conforming changes with other supplements (Supplements Nos. 4 and 6 to EAR Part 746) used under the Russian and Belarusian Industry Sector Sanctions to provide alignment with sanctions imposed by U.S. partners and allies, and make the EAR sanctions stronger, more effective, and easier to understand. This rule makes a clarifying change by revising the section heading to add Belarus and a reference to § 746.5(a)(1)(i). Changing the methodology for identifying items by using the HTS-6 Code and HTS Description to make it easier to align with U.S. allies' and partners' controls. Conforming changes to Supplement no. 2 to Part 746 introductory text to reflect the use of the HTS-6 Codes and HTS Descriptions and to better align this Supplement with Supplement No. 4 to Part 746 introductory text. This rule expands and clarifies Supplement no. 2 to Part 746 to strengthen the controls by specifying that the supplement includes any modified or designed “parts,” “components,” “accessories,” and “attachments” for the items identified in the table to better align the Supplement with Supplement No. 4 to Part 746. This rule also clarifies Supplement No. 2 to Part 746 introductory text to specify that the scope of the license requirement applies to an item's HTS-6 Code and describe how such information relates to other information in the Supplement's table, as well as to content describing other HTS Codes that are longer but still derived from HTS-6 Codes;
  • Expansion of Russian Industry Sector Sanctions under Supplement No. 4 to EAR Part 746 by adding additional items to align the sanctions with sanctions imposed by U.S. partners and allies and by making other changes to render the EAR's sanctions stronger, more effective, and easier to understand. This rule expands the controls by adding 322 HTS-6 Codes to Supplement No. 4 to Part 746. The rule removes Schedule B and Schedule B Description columns under Supplement No. 4 to Part 746 to make it easier to understand the Supplement's scope and to align the controls with those imposed by U.S. allies and partners. There is also a revision to the column used to identify the license requirement under Supplement No. 4 to Part 746 to use the HTS-6 Code column instead of the HTS Description column. There are clarifications to Supplement No. 4 to Part 746’s introductory text to specify how the HTS-6 Codes relate to other information in the table, as well as to content referring to other HTS Codes that are longer but derived from HTS-6 Codes;
  • Expansion of Russian Industry Sector Sanctions under Supplement No. 6 to EAR Part 746 by adding additional items to align them with sanctions imposed by U.S. partners and allies and by making other changes to render the EAR's sanctions stronger, more effective, and easier to understand;
  • Expansion of `Luxury Goods' Sanctions by adding additional items to Supplement No. 5 to EAR Part 746 to align them with sanctions imposed by U.S. allies and partners. This rule expands the scope of the `Luxury Goods' Sanctions by adding two hundred and seventy-six additional entries that will require a license for export or reexport to or transfers within Russia or Belarus and for designated Russian and Belarusian oligarchs and malign actors worldwide under § 746.10(a)(1) and (2); and

 

  • Alignment changes to Supplement No. 3 to EAR Part 746 (Countries Excluded from Certain License Requirements of EAR §§ 746.7 and 746.8) to add Taiwan. Pursuant to the Russia Sanctions rule, 32 countries were added to new Supplement No. 3. In March 2022, BIS published a rule that added South Korea to the list of countries, and in April 2022, it published a rule that added Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Switzerland to the list. Taiwan has implemented measures on Russia and Belarus that are substantially similar to those imposed by BIS. This rule recognizes Taiwan's implementation of such measures; BIS is adding Taiwan to Supplement No. 3 to Part 746 of the EAR with the designation of “full.”

The remaining changes include:

  • Clarification that EAR § 744.7 extends to transfers (in-country), in addition to exports and reexports. In § 744.7, this rule adds the term “transfer (in-country)” wherever the terms “exports” and “reexports” occur to clarify that the license requirements of this section also apply to transfers (in-country);
  • Clarification that the exclusion for items controlled under ECCN 5A992 or 5D992 under EAR§ 746.8 also applies to "Luxury Goods Sanctions" license requirements under EAR § 746.10(a)(1). In § 746.10 (`Luxury goods' sanctions against Russia and Belarus and Russian and Belarusian oligarchs and malign actors), this rule adds introductory text to paragraph (a) to clarify that the same exclusion for ECCNs 5A992 or 5D992 under § 746.8(a) introductory text also applies to the `luxury goods' sanctions under § 746.10(a)(1).; and
  • Conforming changes to the licensing policies under EAR§§ 746.5, 746.8, and 746.10 and addition of a case-by-case license review policy for applications for the disposition of items needed as part of companies curtailing or closing all operations in Russia or Belarus. In §§ 746.5(b)(1) and (2) and 746.10(b), this rule makes conforming changes to each of the licensing policies to conform to the structure of the licensing policy paragraph under § 746.8(b). This rule does so by revising each of the sentences that specify the policy of denial license review policy by adding a period and then adding a new sentence adding the same case-by-case license review policy text to §§ 746.5(b)(1) and (2) and 746.10(b), as is currently found in § 746.8(b). In §§ 746.5(b)(1) and (2), 746.8(b), and 746.10(b), this rule adds a new case-by-case license review policy for applications for the disposition of items by companies not headquartered in Country Group D:1, D:5, E:1 or E:2 that are curtailing or closing all operations in Russia or Belarus. Companies deciding to curtail or close all operations in Russia put further pressure on the Russian government and on the Russian and Belarusian defense industrial base, as their departure will hollow out both countries' industrial capacity and economy, which may lead to further degradation of their defense industrial base.

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/27/2023-03927/implementation-of-additional-sanctions-against-russia-and-belarus-under-the-export-administration

*******

February 27, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 12150: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) amended the Export Administrations Regulations (EAR) to impose new export control measures on Iran. These measures address the use of Iranian Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) by the Russian Federation (Russia) in its ongoing war against Ukraine, contrary to U.S. national security and foreign policy interests. Although UAVs are also known as Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UASs), for purposes of consistency with the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) they are referred to as UAVs in the EAR. These amendments to the EAR target Iran's supply of UAVs to Russia to enhance Russia's defense industrial base and its military efforts against Ukraine and build on prior EAR amendments, including the addition of Iranian entities to the Entity List as Russian "military end users." Specifically, these controls

  • Impose license requirements for a subset of generally low-technology EAR99 items, including semiconductors that are destined for Iran, that are destined to Iran, regardless of whether a U.S. person is involved in the transaction;
  • Establish a new list (Supplement No. 7 to EAR Part 746) identifying these EAR99 items by HTS-6 Code to allow BIS and other U.S. government agencies to track and quantify these exports;
  • Create a new “Iran Foreign Direct Product (FDP) Rule” specific to Iran for items in certain categories of the Commerce Control List and EAR99 items identified in the new Supplement No. 7 to EAR Part 746; And
  • Revise the existing Russia/Belarus FDP rule to cover EAR99 items that have been found in UAVs containing parts and components branded U.S. or U.S.-origin (although they may not actually be U.S. branded or U.S.-origin) which will help to ensure that U.S. products are not available for shipment to Iran for use in the manufacture of UAVs being used by Russia in Ukraine.

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/27/2023-03930/export-control-measures-under-the-export-administration-regulations-ear-to-address-iranian-unmanned

*******

 

February 27, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 12170: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) amended the Entity List set forth in Supplement No. 4 to EAR Part 744 by adding 10 entities under 13 entries to the Entity List. These entities have been determined by the U.S. Government to be acting contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States. These entities are listed on the Entity List under the destinations of Canada (2), China (5), France (1), Luxembourg (1), Netherlands (1), and Russia (3).

 

This final rule added the following ten entities under 13 entries to the Entity List and includes, where appropriate, aliases:

 

Canada:

  • CPUNTO Inc.; and
  • Electronic Network Inc.

 

China:

  • AOOK Technology Ltd.;
  • Beijing Ti-Tech Science and Technology Development Co.;
  • Beijing Yunze Technology Co., Ltd.;
  • China HEAD Aerospace Technology Co.; and
  • Spacety Co. Ltd.

 

France:

  • China HEAD Aerospace Technology Co.

 

Luxembourg:

  • Spacety Co., Ltd.

 

The Netherlands:

  • China HEAD Aerospace Technology Co.

 

Russia:

  • Dexias Industrial Products and Trade Limited Company;
  • Innovation and Technologies LLC; and
  • Promtekhkomplekt JSC.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/27/2023-03929/additions-of-entities-to-the-entity-list

 

*******

 

February 27, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 12155: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) amended the Entity List set forth in Supplement No. 4 to EAR Part 744 by adding seventy-six entities to the Entity List. These entities have been determined by the U.S. Government to be acting contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States and are listed on the Entity List under the destination of Russia. This rule also revises four existing entries on the Entity List under the destination of Russia. The list is found at the attached link.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/27/2023-04099/additions-of-entities-to-the-entity-list-revisions-of-entities-on-the-entity-list

 

Editors note: the ongoing additions to the entities list by the Department of State, Commerce, and Treasury mandates active denied party screening by exporters before engaging in export activity. Not only a best practice but a necessary export control process to keep up with the pace of changes to the DPL!

 

*******

 

Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

 

February 1, 2023: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) imposed full-blocking sanctions against 22 individuals and entities across multiple countries related to a sanctions evasion network supporting Russia’s military-industrial complex. This action, taken pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14024, is part of the U.S. strategy to methodically and intensively target sanctions evasion efforts around the globe, close down key backfilling channels, expose facilitators and enablers, and limit Russia’s access to the revenue needed to wage its brutal war in Ukraine. Over the last year, Treasury has sanctioned over 100 individuals and entities engaging in activity to circumvent international sanctions and export controls imposed on Russia.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Blats, Marks of Latvia;
  • Ng, Serena Bee Lin of Singapore;
  • Palnychenko, Igor of Cyprus;
  • Piflaks, Gilad of Uzbekistan and Israel;
  • Piflaks, Maks Borisovich of Uzbekistan;
  • Volfovich, Alexander of Cyprus;
  • Volfovich, Ariel of Cyprus;
  • Volfovich, Stanislav of Ukraine, Cyprus, and Israel;
  • Zimenkov, Igor Vladimirovich of Russia; Cyprus; Israel; and Uzbekistan; and
  • Zimenkov, Jonatan Russia; Italy; and Israel.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Asia Trading & Construction PTE LTD of Singapore;
  • E.S. Defense Engineering Solutions LTD of Israel;
  • Elektrooptika SIA of Latvia;
  • GBD Limited of Cyprus;
  • GMI Global Manufacturing & Integration LTD of Cyprus;
  • Kliosa Limited of Cyprus;
  • Mateas Limited of Cyprus;
  • Pitaron Limited of Cyprus;
  • Terra-Az Limited of Cyprus;
  • Texel F.C.G. Technology 2100 LTD of Israel;
  • U-Stone Limited EOOD of Bulgaria; and
  • VFC Solutions LTD of Cyprus.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1241 and https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1241

 

*******

 

February 3, 2023: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is designating eight senior executives of Paravar Pars Company (Paravar Pars), an Iran-based firm that was previously sanctioned by the United States and European Union for manufacturing Shahed-series unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Aerospace Force (IRGC ASF). OFAC also identifies two Islamic Republic of Iran Navy (IRIN) vessels, the Iris Makran and the frigate Iris Dena, as property in which the Government of Iran has an interest.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Asadi, Mohsen of Iran;
  • Mohammadi, Mohammad Reza of Iran;
  • Mousa, Mohammad Sadegh Heidari of Iran;
  • Nazeri, Abualfazl of Iran;
  • Salehnejad, Abulfazl of Iran;
  • Shamsabadi, Hossein of Iran; and
  • Valagohar, Abulghasem of Iran.

 

The following vessels have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Iris Dena Vessel Registration Identification IMO 4743313; and
  • Iris Makran Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9486910.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1246 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230203

 

*******

 

February 3, 2023: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has published a determination pursuant to sections 1(a)(ii), 1(b), and 5 of Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 and that effective 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time on February 5, 2023, the price cap on Discount to Crude petroleum products of Russian Federation origin shall be $45 per barrel, and the price cap on Premium to Crude petroleum products of Russian Federation origin shall be $ 100 per barrel.  OFAC also issued a determination pursuant to section 1(a)(ii) of Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 to implement the price cap policy for crude oil and petroleum products of Russian Federation origin. The prohibitions in section l(a)(ii) of E.O. 14071 shall apply to the following categories of services as they relate to the maritime transport of petroleum products of Russian Federation origin (collectively, the "Covered Services"):

  • Trading/commodities brokering;
  • Financing;
  • Shipping;
  • Insurance, including reinsurance and protection and indemnity;
  • Flagging; and
  • Customs brokering.

 

As a result, the following activities are prohibited, except to the extent provided by law, or unless licensed or otherwise authorized by the Office of Foreign Assets Control: the exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, from the United States, or by a United States person, wherever located, of any of the Covered Services to any person located in the Russian Federation.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/price_cap_determination_20230203.pdf and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/determination_eo14071_20230203.pdf

 

Additionally, OFAC has published Guidance on Implementation of the Price Cap Policy for Crude Oil and Petroleum Products of Russian Federation Origin.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/price_cap_guidance_combined_20230203.pdf

 

OFAC has issued Russia-related General License 56A and General License 57A.

 

Russia-related General License 56A: All transactions prohibited by (1) the determination of November 21, 2022, made pursuant to section 1(a)(ii) of Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 (“Prohibitions on Certain Services as They Relate to the Maritime Transport of Crude Oil of Russian Federation Origin”) related to the importation of crude oil, or (2) the determination of February 3, 2023, made pursuant to section 1(a)(ii) of E.O. 14071 (“Prohibitions on Certain Services as They Relate to the Maritime Transport of Petroleum Products of Russian Federation Origin”) related to the importation of petroleum products, into the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Croatia, or landlocked European Union Member States as described in Council Regulation (EU) 2022/879 of June 3, 2022, are authorized.

 

This general license does not authorize any transactions otherwise prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR), including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the RuHSR, unless separately authorized. Effective February 3, 2023, General License No. 56, dated November 22, 2022, is replaced and superseded in its entirety by this General License No. 56A.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl56a.pdf

 

Russia-related General License 57A: All transactions prohibited by (1) the determination of November 21, 2022, made pursuant to section 1(a)(ii) of Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 (“Prohibitions on Certain Services as They Relate to the Maritime Transport of Crude Oil of Russian Federation Origin”) or (2) the determination of February 3, 2023, made pursuant to section 1(a)(ii) of E.O. 14071 (“Prohibitions on Certain Services as They Relate to the Maritime Transport of Petroleum Products of Russian Federation Origin”) that are ordinarily incident and necessary to addressing vessel emergencies related to the health or safety of the crew or environmental protection, including safe docking or anchoring, emergency repairs, or salvage operations, are authorized.

 

This general license does not authorize:

(1) Any transactions related to the offloading of crude oil or petroleum products of Russian Federation origin, except for the offloading of crude oil or petroleum products that is ordinarily incident and necessary to address vessel emergencies authorized pursuant to paragraph (a) of this general license;

(2) Any transactions related to the sale of crude oil or petroleum products of Russian Federation origin; or (3) Any transactions otherwise prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR), including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the RuHSR, unless separately authorized.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl57a.pdf

 

*******

 

February 8, 2023: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned Yulan Adonay Archaga Carias, a.k.a. “Alexander Mendoza” a.k.a. “Porky,” an MS-13 gang leader based in Honduras, and David Elias Campbell Licona a.k.a. “Jorge Eduardo Perez Paz,” an MS-13 associate based in Nicaragua, pursuant to transnational criminal organization authorities. Both individuals are heavily involved in drug trafficking, violence, murder, extortion, and money laundering.

 

The U.S. Department of State’s Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program also announced a reward offer of up to $5 million for information leading to the arrest or conviction of Yulan Adonay Archaga Carias. Submit tips via phone, text, or through the following applications WhatsApp/Signal/Telegram at (+1-202-451-8122) or in Honduras (+504-8886-7166).

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Archaga Carias, Yulan Adonay of Honduras; and
  • Campbell Licona, David Elias of Nicaragua.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1253 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230208

 

*******

 

February 8, 2023: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing one Russia-related Frequently Asked Question (1113).

 

Question 1113: If a decedent’s estate includes securities issued by non-blocked Russian entities, do the new investment prohibitions in Executive Order (E.O.) 14066, E.O. 14068, or E.O. 14071 prohibit the transfer of such securities, through inheritance, to the relevant beneficiary of the decedent’s estate?

 

Answer: No.  U.S. persons, including U.S. financial institutions, may transfer securities issued by non-blocked Russian entities from a decedent’s estate to the account of a relevant beneficiary or beneficiaries, including a successor entity (e.g., a family trust), provided such transfers (i) are part of the ordinary course administration of the decedent’s estate, (ii) do not involve an exchange for value, and (iii) have no other sanctions nexus (including the involvement of blocked persons).

Please note, however, that blocked securities in a decedent’s estate must remain blocked.  The administration of a decedent’s estate requiring the transfer of blocked securities would require a specific license from OFAC.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/1113 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230208

 

*******

 

February 9, 2023: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has issued Syria General License 23 "Authorizing Transactions Related to Earthquake Relief Efforts in Syria." Syria General License (GL) 23 authorizes for 180 days all transactions related to earthquake relief that would be otherwise prohibited by the Syrian Sanctions Regulations (SySR).

 

Syria General License 23: All transactions related to earthquake relief efforts in Syria that would otherwise be prohibited by the Syrian Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 542 (SySR), are authorized through 12:01 p.m. eastern daylight time, August 8, 2023. This authorization includes the processing or transfer of funds on behalf of third-country persons to or from Syria in support of the transactions. U.S. financial institutions and U.S. registered money transmitters may rely on the originator of a funds transfer with regard to compliance, provided that the financial institution does not know or have reason to know that the funds transfer is not in compliance with this general license.

 

This general license does not authorize: (1) Any transactions prohibited by section 542.208 of the SySR (prohibiting importation into the United States of petroleum or petroleum products of Syrian origin); or (2) Any transactions involving any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to the SySR, other than persons who meet the definition of the term Government of Syria, as defined in section 542.305(a) of the SySR, unless separately authorized. Nothing in this general license relieves any person from compliance with any other Federal laws or requirements of other Federal agencies.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1261 and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/syria_gl23.pdf

 

*******

 

February 9, 2023: The United States Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), in coordination with the United Kingdom, is designating seven individuals who are part of the Russia-based cybercrime gang Trickbot. This action represents the very first sanctions of their kind for the U.K. and results from a collaborative partnership between OFAC and the U.K.’s Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office; National Crime Agency; and His Majesty’s Treasury to disrupt Russian cybercrime and ransomware.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Iskritsky, Mikhail of Russia;
  • Karyagin, Valentin Olegovich of Russia;
  • Kovalev, Vitaly Nikolayevich of Russia;
  • Mikhailov, Maksim Sergeevich of Russia;
  • Pleshevskiy, Dmitry of Russia;
  • Sedletski, Valery of Russia; and
  • Vakhromeyev, Ivan Vasilyevich of Russia.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1256 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230209 and https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-cracks-down-on-ransomware-actors

 

*******

 

February 9, 2023: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned nine entities across multiple jurisdictions that have played a critical role in the production, sale, and shipment of hundreds of millions of dollars worth of Iranian petrochemicals and petroleum to buyers in Asia. Treasury is targeting six Iran-based petrochemical manufacturers or their subsidiaries and three firms in Malaysia and Singapore involved in facilitating the sale and shipment of petroleum and petrochemicals on behalf of Triliance Petrochemical Co. Ltd., which OFAC designated on January 23, 2020, for facilitating the sale of Iranian petroleum products from the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC).

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Amir Kabir Petrochemical Company of Iran;
  • Asia Fuel PTE. LTD., of Singapore;
  • Laleh Petrochemical Company of Iran;
  • Marun Sepehr Ofogh Company of Iran;
  • Marun Supplemental Industries Company of Iran;
  • Marun Tadbir Tina Company of Iran;
  • Sense Shipping And Trading SDN. BHD., of Malaysia;
  • Simorgh Petrochemical Company of Iran; and
  • Unicious Energy PTE. LTD., of Singapore.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1257 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230209

 

*******

 

February 9, 2023:  The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned nine entities across multiple jurisdictions that have played a critical role in the production, sale, and shipment of hundreds of millions of dollars worth of Iranian petrochemicals and petroleum to buyers in Asia. Treasury is targeting six Iran-based petrochemical manufacturers or their subsidiaries and three firms in Malaysia and Singapore involved in facilitating the sale and shipment of petroleum and petrochemicals on behalf of Triliance Petrochemical Co. Ltd., which OFAC designated on January 23, 2020, for facilitating the sale of Iranian petroleum products from the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC).

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Iskritsky, Mikhail of Russia;
  • Karyagin, Valentin Olegovich of Russia;
  • Kovalev, Vitaly Nikolayevich of Russia;
  • Mikhailov, Maksim Sergeevich of Russia;
  • Pleshevskiy, Dmitry of Russia;
  • Sedletski, Valery of Russia;
  • Vakhromeyev, Ivan Vasilyevich of Russia.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Amir Kabir Petrochemical Company of Iran;
  • Asia Fuel PTE. LTD. of Singapore;
  • Laleh Petrochemical Company of Iran;
  • Marun Sepehr Ofogh Company of Iran;
  • Marun Supplemental Industries Company of Iran;
  • Marun Tadbir Tina Company of Iran;
  • Sense Shipping And Trading SDN. BHD of Malaysia;
  • Simorgh Petrochemical Company of Iran; and
  • Unicious Energy PTE. LTD., of Singapore.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1257 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230209

 

*******

 

February 10, 2023:  The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned five current or former Bulgarian government officials — Rumen Stoyanov Ovcharov (Ovcharov), Aleksandar Hristov Nikolov (Nikolov), Ivan Kirov Genov (Genov), Nikolay Simeonov Malinov (Malinov), and Vladislav Ivanov Goranov (Goranov) — for their extensive involvement in corruption in Bulgaria. OFAC also designated four entities owned or controlled by Malinov, as well as an entity owned or controlled by Goranov. These individuals and entities are being designated pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13818, which builds upon and implements the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act and targets perpetrators of serious human rights abuse and corruption worldwide.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Genov, Ivan Kirov of Bulgaria;
  • Goranov, Vladislav Ivanov of Bulgaria;
  • Malinov, Nikolay Simeonov of Bulgaria;
  • Nikolov, Aleksandar Hristov of Bulgaria; and
  • Ovcharov, Rumen Stoyanov of Bulgaria.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Inter Trade 2021 EOOD of Bulgaria;
  • MS Konsult 2016 EOOD of Bulgaria;
  • Russophiles For The Revival Of The Fatherland Political Party of Bulgaria;
  • Russophiles National Movement of Bulgaria; and
  • Trilemma Consulting LTD EOOD of Bulgaria.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1264 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230210

 

*******

 

February 21, 2023: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued an OFAC Compliance Communique: Guidance on Authorized Transactions Related to Earthquake Relief Efforts in Syria in response to questions from the NGO community and the general public on how to provide assistance related to earthquake relief to Syria while complying with OFAC sanctions.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230221 and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/syria_earthquake_relief_compliance_guidance.pdf

 

*******

 

February 22, 2023: The U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFCA) added the following individuals and organizations of the Sinaloa Cartel to the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Arredondo Beltran of Mexico;
  • Flores Madrid of Mexico;
  • Machado Torres of Mexico;
  • Zamudio Ibarra of Mexico;
  • Zamudio Lerma of Mexico; and
  • Zamudio Lerma of Mexico.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Aceros Y Refacciones Del Humaya, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico;
  • Farmacia Ludim of Mexico;
  • Grupo Zait, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico;
  • Inmobiliaria Del Rio Humaya, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico;
  • Operadora Del Humaya, S.A. DE C.V., of Mexico; and
  • Operadora Parque Alamedas, S. DE R.L. DE C.V., of Mexico.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230222

 

*******

 

February 24, 2023: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued Russia-related General License 8F, "Authorizing Transactions Related to Energy," General License 13D, "Authorizing Certain Administrative Transactions Prohibited by Directive 4 under Executive Order 14024," General License 60, "Authorizing the Wind-Down and Rejection of Transactions Involving Certain Entities Blocked on February 24, 2023,", and General License 61, "Authorizing Transactions Related to Debt or Equity of, or Derivative Contracts Involving, Certain Entities Blocked on February 24, 2023."

 

Russia-related General License 8FL: All transactions prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 involving one or more of the following entities that are related to energy are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, May 16, 2023:

(1) State Corporation Bank for Development and Foreign Economic Affairs Vnesheconombank;

(2) Public Joint Stock Company Bank Financial Corporation Otkritie;

(3) Sovcombank Open Joint Stock Company;

(4) Public Joint Stock Company Sberbank of Russia;

(5) VTB Bank Public Joint Stock Company;

(6) Joint Stock Company Alfa-Bank;

(7) Public Joint Stock Company Rosbank;

(8) Bank Zenit Public Joint Stock Company;

(9) Bank Saint-Petersburg Public Joint Stock Company;

(10) Any entity in which one or more of the above persons own, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest; or

(11) the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.

 

For the purposes of this general license, the term “related to energy” means the extraction, production, refinement, liquefaction, gasification, regasification, conversion, enrichment, fabrication, transport, or purchase of petroleum, including crude oil, lease condensates, unfinished oils, natural gas liquids, petroleum products, natural gas, or other products capable of producing energy, such as coal, wood, or agricultural products used to manufacture biofuels, or uranium in any form, as well as the development, production, generation, transmission, or exchange of power, through any means, including nuclear, thermal, and renewable energy sources.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl8f.pdf

 

General License 13D: U.S. persons or entities owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a U.S. person are authorized to pay taxes, fees, or import duties and purchase or receive permits, licenses, registrations, or certifications, to the extent such transactions are prohibited by Directive 4 under Executive Order 14024, Prohibitions Related to Transactions Involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, provided such transactions are ordinarily incident and necessary to the day-to-day operations in the Russian Federation of such U.S. persons or entities, through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, June 6, 2023.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl13d.pdf

 

General License 60: All transactions prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind-down of transactions involving one or more of the following blocked persons (collectively, “the Blocked Entities”) are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, May 25, 2023, provided that any payment to a Blocked Entity is made into a blocked account in accordance with the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR):

(1) Bank Saint-Petersburg Public Joint Stock Company;

(2) Bank Zenit Public Joint Stock Company;

(3) Joint Stock Commercial Bank Primorye;

(4) Public Joint Stock Company Bank Uralsib;

(5) Joint Stock Company Commercial Bank Lanta Bank;

(6) SDM-Bank Public Joint Stock Company;

(7) Public Joint Stock Company Stock Commercial Bank Metallurgical Investment Bank;

(8) Public Joint Stock Company Ural Bank for Reconstruction And Development;

(9) Credit Bank of Moscow Public Joint Stock Company; or

(10) Any entity in which one or more of the above persons own, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest.

 

U.S. persons are authorized to reject, rather than block, all transactions prohibited by E.O. 14024 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the processing of funds involving one or more of the Blocked Entities as an originating, intermediary or beneficiary financial institution through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, May 25, 2023.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl60.pdf

 

General License 61: All transactions prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the divestment or transfer, or the facilitation of the divestment or transfer, of debt or equity of the following blocked persons (“covered debt or equity”) to a non-U.S. person are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, May 25, 2023:

(1) Bank Saint-Petersburg Public Joint Stock Company;

(2) Bank Zenit Public Joint Stock Company;

(3) Public Joint Stock Company Bank Uralsib;

(4) Joint Stock Company Commercial Bank Lanta Bank;

(5) SDM-Bank Public Joint Stock Company;

(6) Public Joint Stock Company Stock Commercial Bank Metallurgical Investment Bank; or

(7) Any entity in which one or more of the above persons own, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest.

 

Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this general license, all transactions prohibited by E.O. 14024 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to facilitating, clearing, and settling trades of covered debt or equity that were placed prior to 4:00 p.m. eastern standard time, February 24, 2023, are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, May 25, 2023.

 

All transactions prohibited by E.O. 14024 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind-down of derivative contracts entered into prior to 4:00 p.m. eastern standard time, February 24, 2023, that (i) include a blocked person described above as a counterparty or (ii) are linked to covered debt or equity are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, May 25, 2023, provided that any payments to a blocked person are made into a blocked account in accordance with the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR).

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl61.pdf

 

 

Additionally, OFAC issued five associated Frequently Asked Questions (1114-1118).

 

Question 1114: What actions were taken on February 24, 2023 related to the metals and mining sector of the Russian Federation economy?  

 

Answer: On February 24, 2023, the Director of OFAC, in consultation with the Department of State, issued a sectoral determination pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 that authorizes the imposition of economic sanctions on any person determined to operate or have operated in the metals and mining sector of the Russian Federation economy.  This sectoral determination is effective February 24, 2023. Also, on February 24, 2023, OFAC designated certain entities for operating in the metals and mining sector of the Russian Federation economy.  The U.S. government may, as appropriate, impose sanctions on additional persons determined pursuant to E.O. 14024 to operate or to have operated in this sector.  For further information, please see FAQ 1115.

 

Question 1115: For the purposes of the determination of February 24, 2023 made pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14024, what is meant by the term “metals and mining sector of the Russian Federation economy”?

 

Answer: For the purposes of the determination of February 24, 2023, made pursuant to E.O. 14024, OFAC anticipates publishing regulations defining the term “metals and mining sector of the Russian Federation economy” to include any act, process, or industry of extracting, at the surface or underground, ores, coal, precious stones, or any other minerals or geological materials in the Russian Federation, or any act of procuring, processing, manufacturing, or refining such geological materials, or transporting them to, from, or within the Russian Federation.  This is the definition OFAC used to define the same term in the Ukraine/Russia-related Sanctions Regulations (see 31 CFR 589.325).

 

Question 1116: Does the determination of February 24, 2023, made pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 with regard to the metals and mining sector of the Russian Federation economy mean that all persons that operate or have operated in this sector of the Russian Federation economy are sanctioned by OFAC?

 

Answer: No.  The Director of OFAC, in consultation with the State Department, has issued a determination pursuant to E.O. 14024 that authorizes the imposition of economic sanctions on any person determined to operate or have operated in the metals and mining sector of the Russian Federation economy.

 

A sector determination pursuant to E.O. 14024 exposes persons that operate or have operated in an identified sector to sanctions risk; however, a sector determination does not automatically impose sanctions on all persons who operate or have operated in the sector.  Only persons determined pursuant to E.O. 14024 to operate or have operated in the above-identified sector are subject to sanctions.

Certain additional sanctions may apply to dealings in the metals and mining sector of the Russian Federation economy.  For example, E.O. 14071 prohibits U.S. persons from new investments in the Russian Federation, including in the metals and mining sector.  In addition, certain goods produced by the metals and mining sector of the Russian Federation economy may be prohibited from importation into the United States pursuant to E.O. 14068, such as non-industrial diamonds and gold of Russian Federation origin.  For more information about prohibitions related to non-industrial diamonds, see Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 1022, 1023, 1024, 1026, and 1027.  For more information about prohibitions related to gold, see FAQs 1029 and 1070.

 

Question 1117: My company provides goods or services to, or engages in trade with, persons that operate or have operated in the metals and mining sector of the Russian Federation economy.  Does my company risk being sanctioned by OFAC?

 

Answer: The determination made on February 24, 2023, pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14024, authorizes sanctions on any person determined to operate or have operated in the metals and mining sector of the Russian Federation economy.  Non-U.S. persons may also be exposed to sanctions for activities with persons blocked pursuant to E.O. 14024 (see FAQ 980), including persons blocked following a determination that such persons operate or have operated in the metals and mining sector.

However, OFAC does not intend to target persons for operating in the metals and mining sector where the provision of goods or services is solely for the safety and care of personnel, protection of human life, prevention of accidents or injuries, maintenance or repair necessary to avoid environmental or other significant damage, or activities related to environmental mitigation or remediation.  Examples of such goods include personal protective equipment, safety devices, ventilation systems, and alarm systems; examples of such services include rescue and accident response services, cleaning, safety inspections, and services necessary for use of the goods described above.

 

In addition, non-U.S. persons generally do not risk exposure to U.S. blocking sanctions under E.O. 14024 for engaging in transactions with blocked persons, including in the metals and mining sector, where those transactions would not require a specific license if engaged in by a U.S. person.  For example, non-U.S. persons generally do not risk exposure to U.S. blocking sanctions for engaging in transactions in the metals and mining sector if such transactions would be authorized for U.S. persons by General License (GL) 8F (authorizing certain energy-related transactions) or by GL 6C  (authorizing certain transactions related to the production, manufacturing, sale, transport, or provision of medicine or medical devices, including certain industrial isotopes used in nuclear medicine, among other things).

 

Question 1118: As of December 2022, the Government of the Russian Federation may require a so-called “exit tax” payment prior to the divestment of assets located in the Russian Federation, potentially requiring transactions involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation or the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation.  Does Russia-related General License (GL) 13D authorize transactions that involve the payment of this exit tax? 

 

Answer: No.  GL 13D  authorizes U.S. persons, or entities owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a U.S. person, to pay taxes, fees, or import duties, and purchase or receive permits, licenses, registrations, or certifications involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, or the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation (collectively, Russia-related Directive 4 Entities) that would otherwise be prohibited by Russia-related Directive 4 under Executive Order 14024 (the Russia-related Sovereign Transactions Directive ), provided such transactions are ordinarily incident and necessary to such persons’ day-to-day operations in the Russian Federation.  This so-called “exit tax” is not considered ordinarily incident and necessary to day-to-day operations in the Russian Federation and, thus, not authorized under GL 13D.  Pursuant to the Russia-related Sovereign Transactions Directive, U.S. persons are prohibited from engaging in direct or indirect transactions involving any Russia-related Directive 4 Entity.  Please see Frequently Asked Question 1002.  In light of the potential for the payment of this so-called “exit tax” to involve a Russia-related Directive 4 Entity, U.S. persons whose divestment will involve an “exit tax” payment may require a license from OFAC.  Such persons may submit a request for a specific license with OFAC’s Licensing Division online at http://www.home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/ofac-license-application-page.  OFAC will evaluate such requests on a case-by-case basis.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/added/2023-02-24

 

OFAC also published a Determination Pursuant to Section 1(a)(i) of Executive Order 14024. Section 1(a)(i) of Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 of April 15, 2021 (“Blocking Property With Respect To Specified Harmful Foreign Activities of the Government of the Russian Federation”) imposes economic sanctions on any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, or the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, to operate or have operated in such sectors of the Russian Federation economy as may be determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State. To further address the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States described in E.O. 14024, and in consultation with the Department of State and pursuant to 31 CFR § 587.802, I hereby determine that section 1(a)(i) of E.O. 14024 shall apply to the metals and mining sector of the Russian Federation economy. Any person determined, pursuant to section 1(a)(i) of E.O. 14024, to operate or have operated in this sector shall be subject to sanctions pursuant to section 1(a)(i). This determination shall take effect on February 24, 2023.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/determination_02242023_eo14024.pdf

 

In addition, OFAC has added 200 Russian individuals and entities to the Specially Designated Nationals List. The list of persons and entities is found in the link below.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230224

 

*******

 

February 28, 2023: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned Jesus Cisneros Hernandez, a Mexican arms trafficker, pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14059 for having provided, or have attempted to provide, financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services in support of a person designated under E.O. 14059, namely, the Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion (CJNG). CJNG is a violent Mexico-based organization that traffics a significant proportion of the illicit fentanyl and other deadly drugs that enter the United States. This action was taken in coordination with the Government of Mexico and is the result of OFAC’s collaboration with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives.

 

The following individual has been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Cisneros Hernandez, Jesus of Mexico.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1310 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230228

 

Fines and Penalties

 

Editors note: Fines and Penalties are listed by date. This month February 27, 2023, held the trifecta of export penalties. 3D Systems Corporation entered into a consent agreement with the Department of State for violations of the ITAR, a settlement agreement with the Department of Commerce for violations of the EAR, and a settlement with the Department of Justice for violations of the False Claims Act. The charges are described on pages 35 and 36.

 

February 2, 2023: The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has announced that Dotphins LLC of North Miami, Florida, has agreed to a Settlement Agreement under which its export privileges will be denied for two years (such denial shall be suspended during this two-year probationary period and thereafter waived if Dotphins has not committed any further violations) and it will be required to complete export control training to settle charges that it engaged in two violations of EAR § 764.2(a) - Engaging in Prohibited Conduct. Specifically, on two occasions on or about March 28, 2016, and on or about December 1, 2016, Dotphins engaged in conduct prohibited by the EAR when it shipped red dot scopes from the United States destined to Austria and Switzerland without the required BIS licenses. The red dot scopes, which are subject to the EAR, were then classified under Export Control Classification Number 0A987.c, controlled on crime control grounds, and valued in total at approximately $199.26. Pursuant to Section 762.7 of the Regulations, a license was (and remains) required for the export of these items.

 

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/export-violations-2023/1456-e2796/file

 

*******

 

February 3, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 7394: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry (BIS) denied the export privileges of Michael Cox for ten years until May 18, 2031. On May 18, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Michael Cox (“Cox”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 371. Specifically, Cox was convicted of conspiring to export defense articles, specifically Night Sighting Equipment, to Ukraine without the required licenses. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Cox to 32 months of confinement, three years of supervised release, and $100 special assessment. BIS has also revoked any BIS-issued licenses in which Cox had an interest at the time of his conviction.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/03/2023-02321/in-the-matter-of-michael-cox-1513-e-muir-avenue-hazel-park-mi-48030-2671-order-denying-export

 

*******

 

February 3, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 7395: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry (BIS) denied the export privileges of Shirley Trinity Inzunza for eight years until January 22, 2026. On January 22, 2018, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Shirley Trinity Inzunza (“Inzunza”) was convicted of violating Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C 2778) (“AECA”). Specifically, Inzunza was convicted of knowingly and willfully attempting to export and causing to be exported from the United States to Mexico 10,000 23 rounds of .223 caliber ammunition, which was designated as a defense article on the United States Munitions List, without having first obtained from the Department of State a license for such export or written authorization for such export.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/03/2023-02323/in-the-matter-of-shirley-trinity-inzunza-6767-n-7th-street-unit-220-phoeniz-az-85014-order-denying

 

*******

 

February 3, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 7396: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry (BIS) denied the export privileges of Amin Yousefi Jam for seven years until November 17, 2028. On November 17, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Amin Yousefi Jam (“Amin Jam”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 371. Specifically, Amin Jam was convicted of conspiring to export goods from the United States to Iran through the United Arab Emirates without having first obtained the required licenses from the Office of Foreign Assets Control. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Amin Jam to time served, one year of supervised release, and a $100 assessment.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/03/2023-02324/in-the-matter-of-amin-yousefi-jam-7165-yonge-street-markham-ontario-canada-l3t-0c9-order-denying

 

*******

 

February 3, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 7397: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry (BIS) denied the export privileges of Josef Koyshman for ten years until February 6, 2030. On February 6, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Josef Koyshman (“Koyshman”) was convicted of violating Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C 2778) (“AECA”). Specifically, Koyshman was convicted of willfully exporting, attempting to export, and attempting to cause the export, from the United States to Hong Kong, one (1) High Power Advanced Laser-Aiming System and one (1) AN/PRC-152 Handheld Radio and one (1) AN/PVS-31A Binocular Night Vision Goggles, all of which were designated as defense articles on the United States Munition List, without first obtaining from the U. S. Department of State a license for such export or written approval. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Koyshman to 12 months and one day in prison, 24 months of supervised release and a $100 assessment.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/03/2023-02326/in-the-matter-of-josef-koyshman-17410-fairland-ct-granada-hills-ca-91344-order-denying-export

 

*******

 

February 3, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 7398: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry (BIS) denied the export privileges of Victor Anthony Bocanegra for ten years until March 3, 2030. On March 3, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Victor Anthony Bocanegra (“Bocanegra”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554(a). Specifically, Bocanegra was convicted of smuggling from the U.S. to Mexico one (1) Barrett .50 caliber, semi-automatic rifle bearing the serial number #AA007434 in violation of 18 U.S.C. 554. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Bocanegra to 37 months confinement with credit for time served, two years of supervised release, and a $100 assessment.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/03/2023-02329/in-the-matter-of-victor-anthony-bocanegra-6767-n-7th-street-unit-220-phoenix-az-85014-order-denying

 

*******

 

February 3, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 7399: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry (BIS) denied the export privileges of Maria Guadalupe Pina for eight years until February 2, 2029. On February 2, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Maria Guadalupe Pina (“Pina”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554(a). Specifically, Pina was convicted of fraudulently and knowingly exporting and sending, and attempting to export and send, from the United States to Mexico twenty (20) full automatic lower parts kits for M-16 rifles and twenty (20) pistol grips for M-16 and AR-type rifles. As a result of her conviction, the Court sentenced Pina to 30 months in prison, three years of supervised release, and a $100 court assessment.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/03/2023-02322/in-the-matter-of-maria-guadalupe-pina-807-guadalupe-st-laredo-tx-78040-order-denying-export

 

********

 

February 3, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 7685: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry (BIS) denied the export privileges of Obaidullah Syed for ten years until May 17, 2032. On May 17, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Obaidullah Syed (“Syed”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 371. Specifically, Syed was convicted of conspiring to export computers, computer systems, and associated equipment from the United States to the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission without a license from the U.S. Department of Commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 371. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Syed to one year and one day in prison, one year and one day of supervised release, an assessment of $100, and forfeiture in the amount of $247,000.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/06/2023-02397/in-the-matter-of-obaidullah-syed-12-cottonwood-road-northbrook-il-60659-order-denying-export

 

*******

 

February 7, 2023: A federal court in New York unsealed an indictment charging a citizen of the Russian Federation and legal permanent resident of the United States with participating in a scheme to make over $4 million in U.S. dollar payments to maintain four real properties in the United States that were owned by Viktor Vekselberg, a sanctioned oligarch, as well as to attempt to sell two of those properties.

 

According to court documents, Vladimir Voronchenko, aka Vladimir Vorontchenko, 70, of Moscow, Russia; New York, New York; Southampton, New York; and Fisher Island, Florida, is additionally charged with contempt of court in connection with his flight from the United States following receipt of a grand jury subpoena requiring his personal appearance and testimony.

 

According to allegations in the indictment, Voronchenko, who resided at various times in New York, Florida, and Russia, held himself out as a successful businessman, art collector, and art dealer, and as a close friend and business associate of Vekselberg.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/associate-sanctioned-oligarch-indicted-sanctions-evasion-and-money-laundering

 

*******

 

February 9, 2023: Kambiz Attar Kashani, 44, a dual citizen of the United States and Iran, was sentenced to 30 months in prison for conspiring to illegally export U.S. goods and technology to end users in Iran, including the Central Bank of Iran, in violation of the International Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The Central Bank of Iran is an Iranian government agency that, according to the U.S. government, has materially supported Lebanese Hizballah and the Qods Force of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, both designated terrorist organizations.

 

According to court documents, between February 2019 and June 2021, Kashani and his co-conspirators used two front companies in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) to illegally procure electronic goods and technology from multiple U.S. technology companies, including one located in Brooklyn, for end users in Iran, including the Central Bank of Iran. Certain goods and technology Kashani and his co-conspirators transshipped were controlled by the U.S. government for national security and anti-terrorism reasons. Kashani and his co-conspirators intentionally concealed from the U.S. companies that they intended to send the items to Iran, falsely claiming that the UAE companies would be the ultimate end users. By providing the Central Bank of Iran and other end users in Iran with sophisticated, top-tier U.S. electronic equipment and software, Kashani and his co-conspirators enabled the Iranian banking system to operate more efficiently, effectively and securely.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/us-citizen-sentenced-conspiring-provide-electronic-equipment-and-technology-government-iran

 

*******

 

February 3, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 9429: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry (BIS) denied the export privileges of Arash Yousefi Jam for seven years until October 14, 2028. On October 14, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Arash Yousefi Jam (“Arash Jam”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 371. Specifically, Arash Jam was convicted of conspiring to export goods from the United States to Iran through the United Arab Emirates without having first obtained the required licenses from the Office of Foreign Assets Control. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Arash Jam to time served, one year of supervised release, and a $100 assessment.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/14/2023-03103/in-the-matter-of-arash-yousefi-jam-24-great-heron-court-king-city-ontario-canada-order-denying

 

*******

 

February 3, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 9475: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry (BIS) denied the export privileges of Luc Edmond for five years until February 19, 2025. On February 19, 2020, Edmond was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554(a) for knowingly and willfully attempting to smuggle from the U.S. to Canada a Sig Sauer P228 pistol kit and an AR-15 300 AAC 7.5” pistol kit, which were designated as defense articles on the United States Munitions List, without first obtaining the required license or written authorization from the Department of State. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Emond to 10 months in prison, a fine of $3,000, and a $100 special assessment.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/14/2023-03104/in-the-matter-of-luc-emond-9300-justine-street-montreal-quebec-h1j2p2-canada-order-denying-export

 

*******

 

February 3, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 10286: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry (BIS) denied the export privileges of Shuren Qin for ten years until September 8, 2031. On September 8, 2021, Qin was convicted of violating the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq.) (“IEEPA”), 8 U.S.C. 1001, and 18 U.S.C. 554(a), among other violations. Specifically, Qin was convicted of conspiring to unlawfully export items from the United States to Northwestern Polytechnical University, an entity on the Department of Commerce's Entity List, without first obtaining the required export licenses; two counts of making false statements to law enforcement agents regarding his customers and the types of parts he caused to be exported from the United States to China; and two counts of smuggling hydrophones from the United States to China. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Qin to 24 months of confinement, two years of supervised release, a $1,000 assessment, and a $20,000 criminal fine.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/17/2023-03420/in-the-matter-of-shuren-qin

 

*******

 

February 3, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 10287: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry (BIS) denied the export privileges of Jorge Martin Dorame, Jr. for five years until January 26, 2026. On January 26, 2021, Dorame was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554(a) for smuggling and attempting to smuggle from the United States to Mexico weapons, weapons components, and weapons parts, specifically: four Matrix Arms AR-15 80% lower receivers, two Tapco AR T6 collapsible stocks, twenty Browning 1919 A4 .308 WIN caliber ammunition links, five Apex SAW/M249 M27 5.56x45 caliber ammunition links, two AR-15 compensators, three Brownells AR-15 H3 carbine buffers, five DPMS AR-15 hammer springs, five Magpul MOE AR-15 trigger guards, five DPMS AR-15 trigger springs, one DPMS AR-15 buffer tube, one Brownells M 16 bolt carrier group, two Brownells AR-15 receiver end plates, two Brownells AR-15 charging handles, three DPMS AR-15 receiver extension castle nuts, five Luth-AR M-16 auto sears with springs, and six Luth-AR M-16 disconnectors. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Dorame to 60 months of probation and a $100 special assessment.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/17/2023-03445/in-the-matter-of-jorge-martin-dorame-jr-4540-s-rural-road-apt-g8-tempe-az-85282-order-denying-export

 

*******

 

February 3, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 10288: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry (BIS) denied the export privileges of Rafael Palomares, Jr. for ten years until May 13, 2031. On May 31, 2021, Palomares was convicted of violating section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C 2778) (“AECA”) for knowingly and willfully agreeing to conspire with others to export firearms from the United States to Mexico without the required licenses. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Palomares to 45 months of confinement with credit for time served, three years of supervised release, and a $100 assessment.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/17/2023-03450/in-the-matter-of-rafael-palomares-jr-inmate-number-16266-508-fci-florence-federal-correctional

 

*******

 

February 3, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 10289: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry (BIS) denied the export privileges of Carlos Francisco Rodriguez for seven years until November 3, 2028. On November 3, 2028, Rodriguez was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554(a) for knowingly and willfully attempting to smuggle from the U.S. to Mexico approximately 15,923 rounds of ammunition of assorted calibers. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Francisco Rodriguez to 24 months in prison, 3 years of supervised release, and a $100 special assessment.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/17/2023-03448/in-the-matter-of-carlos-francisco-rodriguez-4902-marcella-ave-apartment-25-laredo-tx-78041-6315

 

*******

 

February 9, 2023: Todd Coleman of Massachusetts was sentenced to 33 months in prison for his role in a scheme in which he accepted bribes from an Afghan company in exchange for helping it deceive the U.S. military into awarding at least ten contracts at inflated values.

 

According to court documents, Coleman was an analyst at a U.S. company who was deployed to Afghanistan in 2011 and 2012 to evaluate bids for U.S.-funded reconstruction contracts awarded by the U.S. military. At that time, Coleman and Orlando Clark, a manager of reconstruction projects at a different U.S. company who was also deployed to Afghanistan, received approximately $400,000 in bribes from an Afghan company. In return, Coleman and Clark assisted the company in obtaining millions of dollars in contracts that involved the construction of an Afghan police station and a security checkpoint for U.S. forces.

 

To conceal their conduct, Coleman and Clark registered fictitious companies in the State of Georgia and opened bank accounts to which bribes were sent via wire transfers from Afghanistan. Coleman and Clark also created false invoices to make it appear as though they were involved in a car-exporting business in the United Arab Emirates. In reality, Coleman and Clark used the bribe payments to enrich themselves by purchasing personal items, such as a BMW. During the scheme, Coleman and Clark also traveled to the United Arab Emirates to receive cash bribes, which they smuggled into the United States without declaring the currency.

 

On Jan. 4, Clark pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bribery of a public official and (in an unrelated scheme) conspiracy to commit visa fraud. He is scheduled to be sentenced on April 12 and faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison on each charge. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/man-sentenced-scheme-involving-us-funded-military-contracts

 

*******

 

February 17, 2023: An indictment was unsealed in the District of Connecticut charging Glenn Oztemel, 64, of Westport, Connecticut, and a foreign national with conspiracy, multiple counts of violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), and money laundering in connection with an alleged scheme to pay bribes to Brazilian officials to win contracts with Brazil’s state-owned and state-controlled energy company, Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. – Petrobras (Petrobras).

 

According to court documents, Oztemel worked as a senior oil and gas trader at two Connecticut-based trading companies (Trading Company #1 and Trading Company #2). Eduardo Innecco, 73, a dual Brazilian and Italian citizen, worked as an oil and gas broker and agent for Trading Company #1 and Trading Company #2 in Brazil. Between approximately mid-2010 and continuing into 2018, Oztemel, Innecco, and others allegedly paid bribes to Petrobras officials for their assistance in helping Trading Company #1 and Trading Company #2 obtain and retain business with Petrobras, including by providing Oztemel, Innecco, and others with confidential information regarding Petrobras’ fuel oil business. As alleged, Oztemel and his co-conspirators caused Trading Company #1 and Trading Company #2 to make corrupt payments – disguised as purported consulting fees and commissions – to Innecco, knowing that Innecco would pay a portion of those funds to Brazilian officials as bribes. To conceal the scheme, Oztemel, Innecco, and their co-conspirators allegedly used coded language to refer to the bribes and communicated using personal email accounts, fictitious names, and encrypted messaging applications.

Oztemel and Innecco are each charged with conspiracy to violate the FCPA, conspiracy to commit money laundering, three counts of violating the FCPA, and two counts of money laundering. They face up to five years in prison for each of the bribery conspiracy and bribery charges, and up to 20 years in prison for each of the money laundering conspiracy and money laundering charges.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/senior-oil-and-gas-trader-and-brazil-based-intermediary-charged-bribery-and-money-laundering

 

*******

 

February 24, 2023: Pursuant to Section 766.24 of the Export Administration Regulations ( “EAR”), the Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”), U.S. Department of Commerce, through its Office of Export Enforcement (“OEE”), has requested the issuance a Temporary Denial Order of temporarily denying, for a period of 180 days, the export privileges under the Regulations of Ilya Balakaev and Radiotester OOO a/k/a Radiotester LLC or Russia, for the unauthorized export of controlled counterintelligence items to Russia and North Korea.

 

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/export-violations-2023/1467-e2806/file

 

*******

 

February 24, 2023: A five-count indictment was unsealed in federal court in Brooklyn, New York, charging Ilya Balakaev with various charges related to smuggling devices commonly used in counterintelligence operations out of the U.S. to Russia for the benefit of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB) and Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (“DPRK” or “North Korea”).

 

As alleged, between 2017 and the present, the defendant Ilya Balakaev entered into multiple contracts through his company Radiotester LLC with the FSB—the principal intelligence and security agency of the Russian government—to repair spectrum analyzers and signal generators.  The devices that the defendant was tasked to repair were frequently used as part of counterintelligence operations to sweep for surveillance bugs and to transmit covert communications.  Because the devices were not readily available in Russia, the defendant created a network of individuals in the U.S. to assist him in purchasing the equipment in the U.S., which he used to repair the FSB devices in violation of U.S. sanctions.

The defendant worked closely with Russian government officials from FSB Center 8’s Military Unit 43753, the agency responsible for Russia’s communication security and cryptology.  In furtherance of his scheme, the defendant entered into at least ten contracts with FSB Military Unit 43753, purchased approximately 43 devices in the U.S., and traveled to the U.S. approximately 14 times in the span of approximately four years.

 

In addition to his scheme to evade Russian sanctions, the defendant also provided U.S. technology to a North Korean government official in violation of U.S. sanctions against North Korea.  The defendant contracted with the First Secretary of the North Korean Embassy to the Russian Federation, based in Moscow, to obtain hazardous gas detectors and software from the U.S. for the benefit of the North Korean government.

 

https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/russian-national-charged-supplying-us-technology-russian-and-north-korean-governments

 

*******

 

February 24, 2023: From the outset of Russia’s unprovoked, full-scale invasion of Ukraine one year ago, the Department of Justice has prioritized enforcing the sweeping sanctions, export restrictions, and economic countermeasures that the United States has imposed alongside our global partners. The Department continues that work by actions in two separate federal cases to disrupt sanctions evasion and smuggling networks supporting the Russian regime.

 

The U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a civil forfeiture complaint against six real properties located in New York, New York; Southampton, New York; and Fisher Island, Florida, worth approximately $75 million. The complaint alleges that the properties beneficially owned by Russian oligarch Viktor Vekselberg are the proceeds of sanctions violations and were involved in international money laundering transactions. The case arises in the wake of the indictment of Vekselberg’s alleged strawman, Vladimir Voronchenko, a fugitive previously charged in the Southern District of New York. In the Eastern District of New York, a five-count indictment (see reference above) was unsealed, charging Ilya Balakaev, 47, of Moscow, with various offenses related to a years-long scheme to illegally smuggle sensitive devices used in counterintelligence operations from the United States to Russia for the benefit of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB), the principal intelligence and security agency of the Russian government. Balakaev is further charged with illegally exporting a gas detector and related software from the United States to Russia for the benefit of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK or North Korea). Concurrent with this action in the Eastern District of New York, the Department of Commerce separately issued a Temporary Denial Order denying the export privileges of Balakaev and his company, Radiotester OOO (aka Radiotester LLC), for 180 days with the possibility of renewal.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/task-force-kleptocapture-unseals-two-cases-charging-evasion-russian-economic-countermeasures

 

*******

 

February 27, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 12310: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry (BIS) denied the export privileges of Javier Campos for ten years until February 22, 2031. On February 22, 2021, Campos was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554(a) of smuggling and attempting to smuggle from the United States to Mexico 6000 rounds of 7.62 x 39 mm ammunition. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Campos to 51 months of confinement, three years of supervised release and a $100 assessment.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/27/2023-03984/in-the-matter-of-javier-campos-inmate-number-13278-579-fci-terre-haute-federal-correctional

 

*******

 

February 27, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 12311: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry (BIS) denied the export privileges of Marco Rodriguez for ten years until March 12, 2031. On March 12, 2021, Rodriguez was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 371 and 18 U.S.C. 554(a) for conspiring and unlawfully smuggling from the US to Mexico, 5,000 rounds of .223 caliber ammunition and 5,000 rounds of 7.62 x 39 mm caliber ammunition. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Rodriguez to 40 months of confinement on each count, to run concurrently and with credit for time served, 36 months of supervised release and a $300 special assessment.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/27/2023-03983/in-the-matter-of-marco-rodriguez-inmate-number-14132-508-fci-safford-federal-correctional

 

*******

 

February 27, 2023: The U.S. Department of State has concluded an administrative settlement with 3D Systems Corporation (3D) of Rock Hill, South Carolina, to resolve alleged violations of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA), 22 U.S.C. § 2751 et seq., and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), 22 C.F.R. Parts 120-130.  The Department of State and 3D have reached this settlement following an extensive compliance review by the Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance in the Department’s Bureau of Political-Military Affairs.

 

The Department of State and 3D have reached an agreement pursuant to ITAR § 128.11 to address alleged ITAR violations occurring during the period of 2012 – 2018 involving unauthorized exports of technical data to Germany, unauthorized exports and retransfers of technical data to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), a proscribed destination under ITAR § 126.1, unauthorized reexports of technical data to Taiwan, unauthorized exports of technical data to foreign-person employees, and the failure to maintain ITAR records.

 

The settlement demonstrates the Department’s role in strengthening U.S. industry by protecting U.S.-origin technical data from unauthorized exports.  The settlement also highlights the importance of obtaining appropriate authorization from the Department before exporting ITAR-controlled technical data.

 

Under the terms of the 36-month Consent Agreement, 3D Systems Corporation will pay a civil penalty of $20,000,000.  The Department has agreed to suspend $10,000,000 of this amount on the condition that the funds will be used for Department-approved Consent Agreement remedial compliance measures to strengthen 3D’s compliance program.  In addition, the Company will engage an external Special Compliance officer for at least the first year of the Consent Agreement and will conduct two external audits of its ITAR compliance program and implement additional compliance measures.

 

https://www.state.gov/u-s-department-of-state-concludes-20000000-settlement-of-alleged-export-violations-by-3d-systems-corporation/

 

The Consent Agreement for this case is posted on the following Department of State website:

 

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_kb_article_page&sys_id=384b968adb3cd30044f9ff621f961941

 

*******

 

February 27, 2023: As part of a settlement agreement, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued an order imposing an administrative penalty of $2,777,750 on 3D Systems Corp. (3D Systems). 3D Systems is also required to retain a third-party consultant and to complete two audits of its export controls compliance program. This settlement resolves the allegations set forth in a Proposed Charging Letter (PCL) regarding 19 violations by 3D Systems of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by exporting controlled aerospace technology and metal alloy powder to China without the required license, and by exporting controlled technology to Germany without the required license. The PCL also included allegations related to 3D Systems failing to comply with the EAR’s recordkeeping requirements. 3D Systems admitted to committing the alleged conduct set forth in the PCL as part of this agreement. In addition to the BIS penalty, 3D Systems entered into corresponding settlement agreements with the Department of State and the Department of Justice.

 

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/about-bis/newsroom/press-releases/3233-2023-02-27-3d-press-release/file

 

The BIS order can be found at the following website:

 

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/export-violations-2023/1468-e2807/file

 

*******

 

February 27, 2023: 3D Systems Corp. (3D Systems), a 3D printing company, has agreed to pay the United States up to $4.54 million to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act by improperly transmitting export-controlled technical data to China in violation of the export control laws of the United States in connection with certain NASA and DOD contracts, announced U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Texas Leigha Simonton.

 

In parallel agreements also related to alleged export violations, the company has agreed to a $20 million administrative settlement with the U.S. Department of State and a $2.77 million administrative settlement with the U.S. Department of Commerce.

 

Per the terms of a civil settlement executed with the Department of Justice on February 27, 2023, South Carolina-based 3D Systems Corporation agreed to pay $2.27 million in restitution to the federal government within the next 30 days. The company may be required to pay an additional $2.27 million in penalties under the Justice Department settlement agreement, for a total of up to $4.54 million, if it fails to pay at least that amount in civil penalties to the Department of State and the Department of Commerce in connection with the parallel administrative settlements referenced above.

 

According to the Justice Department Settlement Agreement, 3D Systems – through its Quickparts subsidiary – completed on-demand manufacturing projects both directly and indirectly on contracts issued by DOD and NASA, including for projects involving technical or other data potentially classified under and controlled by the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the Arms Export Control Act, the Export Administration Regulations, and/or the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (collectively, the Export Control Laws).

 

Generally, the Export Control Laws prohibit certain controlled items and/or intellectual property from being exported to certain foreign countries, including the People’s Republic of China, without a license or authorization from the appropriate federal agencies. In the Justice Department settlement agreement, the United States alleged that between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017, 3D exported certain items and/or intellectual property to China without the appropriate license or authorization in violation of the Export Control Laws in connection with certain contracts issued by DOD and NASA in violation of the False Claims Act.

 

https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndtx/pr/3d-printing-company-pay-454-million-settle-false-claims-act-allegations-export

 

*******

 

February 28, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 12654: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry (BIS) denied the export privileges of Qingshan Li for ten years until June 12, 2030. On June 12, 2020, Li was convicted of violating Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C 2778) (“AECA”). For knowingly and willfully attempting to export from the United States to China a Harris Falcon III AN/PRC 152A Radio, which is designated as a defense article on the United States Munitions List, without the required licenses or written authorization from the State Department. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Li to 36 months of confinement, three years of supervised release, and a $100 assessment. Li was also placed on the U.S. Department of State’s debarred list.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/28/2023-03985/in-the-matter-of-qingshan-li-room-201-no106-lane-24-chengshan-rd-pudong-district-shanghai-china

FEBRUARY 2023 EXPORT CONTROL REGULATION UPDATES Read More »

JANUARY 2023 EXPORT CONTROL REGULATION UPDATES

This newsletter lists the latest changes in export control regulations through January 31, 2023.  The newsletter is provided as a complimentary service to assist exporters with their ITAR and EAR export compliance responsibilities. It summarizes recent changes to export control regulations or other regulatory matters of interest that may impact your company’s international trade and export compliance functions. Call us at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net with questions or comments.

 

See our “Latest Sanctions Fines & Penalties” section below for an update on companies and persons denied export privileges by the United States Government.

 

REGULATORY UPDATES

 

The President

 

President Biden Enacted The Protecting American Intellectual Property Act of 2022 

 

January 5, 2023: On January 5, 2023, President Biden signed the Protecting American Intellectual Property Act of 2022 (the Act) into law. The Act requires periodic reports to Congress identifying any “foreign persons” who are found to have engaged in significant theft of trade secrets of U.S. persons. The Act also requires menu-based sanctions against such persons, which may include blocking sanctions.

 

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/1294/text and https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/export-controls--trade--investment-sanctions/1270622/new-sanctions-authority-for-theft-of-us-trade-secrets-by-foreign-persons

 

*******

 

U.S. Department Of Commerce

 

The U.S. Department of Commerce Issued Adjustments For Inflation To Each Civil Monetary Penalty Within Its Jurisdiction

 

January 3, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 3: The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued adjustments for inflation to each civil monetary penalty within its jurisdiction. The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 and the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, required the head of each agency to adjust for inflation its CMP levels in effect as of November 2, 2015, under a revised methodology that was effective for 2016 which provided for initial catch up adjustments for inflation in 2016, and requires adjustments for inflation to CMPs under a revised methodology for each year thereafter. The Department of Commerce's 2023 adjustments for inflation to CMPs, effective January 15, 2023, apply only to CMPs with a dollar amount and will not apply to CMPs written as functions of violations. The Department of Commerce's 2023 adjustments for inflation to CMPs apply only to those CMPs, including those whose associated violation predated such adjustment, which is assessed by the Department of Commerce after the effective date of the new CMP level. The adjustments for civil violations at the maximum level for violations of the Export Controls  Act of 2018 increased from $328,121 to $353,534 on January 15, 2023.

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/01/03/2022-28363/civil-monetary-penalty-adjustments-for-inflation

 

*******

 

Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) Amended The EAR Per Decisions Made At The Australia Group (AG) Virtual Implementation Meetings And The AG Plenary Meeting

 

January 17, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 2507: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published a final rule to amend the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to reflect decisions made at the November 2021 and March 2022 Australia Group (AG) Virtual Implementation Meetings and the AG Plenary Meeting held in July 2022. The amendments include revisions to certain Export Control Classification Numbers to clarify the controls on genetic elements and genetically modified organisms and the scope of the exclusion that applies to medical isolators “specially designed” for barrier nursing or transportation of infected patients; and make clarifications by adding four naturally occurring, dual-use marine toxins (specifically, brevetoxins, gonyautoxins, nodularins and palytoxin) and removing cholera toxin. The addition of these four toxins is consistent with Section 1758 of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (ECRA) regarding emerging and foundational technologies. This rule also included amendments to reflect the AG Plenary updates to the nomenclature of certain bacteria and fungi, and the clarification of the definition of “disinfected” as it applies to certain biological equipment.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/01/17/2023-00397/implementation-of-australia-group-decisions-from-2021-and-2022-virtual-meetings-controls-on-marine

 

*******

January 18, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 2821: On October 7, 2022, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) updated the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to implement necessary controls on advanced computing integrated circuits (ICs), computer commodities that contain such ICs, and certain semiconductor manufacturing items, and to make other changes to the EAR to ensure that appropriate controls are in place for these items, including specific activities of “U.S. persons.” This rule updates the controls to more effectively achieve the policy objectives identified in previous regulations by adding the same controls implemented in China in that rule to Macau.

 

This rule is effective on January 17, 2023.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/01/18/2023-00888/implementation-of-additional-export-controls-certain-advanced-computing-and-semiconductor

 

*******

 

 

Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC)

 

DDTC Name And Address Changes Posted To Website

 

January 3 through 26, 2023: The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) posted the following name and/or address changes on its website at    

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_kb_article_page&sys_id=bd72ca0adbf8d30044f9ff621f961981:

 

  • General Electric Canada Changes in Names and Addresses from General Electric International Inc. 2300 Meadowdale Blvd., Mississauga, Canada (and all locations in Canada), General Electric International Inc. 201 Brownlow Ave., Unit 12, Dartmouth, Canada (and all locations in Canada), General Electric Canada Company 2300 Meadowdale Blvd., Mississauga, Canada (and all locations in Canada), and General Electric Canada 60 Queen Street, Suite 1200, Ottawa, Canada (and all locations in Canada) to GEC Aviation Inc. 1919 Minnesota Court, Suite 100, Mississauga, Canada L5N 0C9 due to corporate reorganization;
  • Change in Address for Howmet de Mexico S De RL CV (Howmet de Mexico) from K.M. 7.100.500 Carretera Presa La Amistad, Parque Industrial Amistad, Acuna, Coahuila, Mexico C.P. 26220 to Avenida Hidalgo No. 120, Parque Industrial Amistad, Ciudad Acuna, Coahuila, Mexico C.P. 26220;
  • Change in Name from Hanwha Defense Co., Ltd. to Hanwha Aerospace Co., Ltd due to merger;
  • Change in Name from Ultra Electronics Limited to Ultra Sonar Systems Limited, Ultra I&C Limited, and Ultra Nuclear Limited due to internal restructuring;
  • Change in Name from Ultra Electronics Limited to Ultra PCS Limited and Ultra Electronics CEMS Limited due to internal restructuring;
  • Change in Name from Viasat, Inc. to L3Harris Technologies, Inc., subsidiary L3 Technologies, Inc. as a result of the acquisition of the Tactical Data Link product line assets by L3Harris Technologies, Inc.;
  • Changes in Name from Alion Science and Technology Corporation and HII Defense and Federal Solutions, Inc. to HII Mission Technologies Corp. as a result of corporate restructuring;
  • Change in Name from Astek Industrie to Astek Technology;
  • Change in Address for MTG Marinetechnik GmbH from Budnikowsky-Twiete 7, 22041 Hamburg, Germany to Am Stadtrand 63, 22047 Hamburg, Germany;
  • Change in Name from Tecnavia to Babcock Mission Critical Services France SA due to acquisition;
  • Change in Name from Proteus to Babcock Mission Critical Services France SA due to acquisition;
  • Change in Name from Inaer Helicopters France SA to Babcock Mission Critical Services France SA due to acquisition;
  • Change in Name from Airbus HAPS Connectivity Solutions Ltd. to Aalto Haps Limited due to corporate rebranding;
  • Change in Name from Viasat Australia Pty Ltd to L3Harris Communications Australia Pty Ltd. as a result of the acquisition of the Australian Tactical Data Link product line assets by L3Harris Technologies, Inc.;
  • Change in Address for Unitronex Corporation from 2155 Shelby Drive, Suite C, Sedona, Arizona 86336 to 781 Cove Parkway, Suite B, Cottonwood, Arizona 86326.

 

*******

 

The U.S. Department Of State Established The Office Of The Special Envoy For Critical And Emerging Technology

 

January 3, 2023: The U.S. Department of State has established the Office of the Special Envoy for Critical and Emerging Technology and began operations at the Department of State on January 3, 2023.  Secretary Blinken established the office as part of the wider modernization agenda because the constellation of critical and emerging technologies reshaping the world is now an integral part of the conduct of U.S. foreign policy and diplomacy. The competition to develop and deploy foundational technologies is intensifying. The Office of the Special Envoy will bring additional technology policy expertise, diplomatic leadership, and strategic direction to the Department’s approach to critical and emerging technologies. As the Department works to strengthen tech diplomacy across the organization, the office will provide a center of expertise and energy to develop and coordinate critical and emerging technology foreign policy, and to engage foreign partners on emerging technologies that will transform our societies, economies, and security—including biotechnology, advanced computing, artificial intelligence, and quantum information technologies.  It will work in close coordination with the various bureaus and offices across the Department that are engaging on these and other technology topics that are central to our foreign policy.

 

https://www.state.gov/establishing-the-office-of-the-special-envoy-for-critical-and-emerging-technology/

*******

 

The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls Updated Its Guidance For U.S. Persons Working Abroad

 

January 5, 2023: The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) has updated the guidance for U.S. persons working abroad (USPAB) applications. The Guidance is a 10-page, four-part guidance.  Part 1 provides General Guidance, Part 2 provides an outline of the required elements for a USPAB Authorization Submission Request, Part 3 provides a template for the required submission letter, and Part 4 provides guidance for the completion of the required DS-6004 form in DECCS.

 

The Guidance for USPAB Authorizations relies heavily on defined terms from Part 120 of the ITAR in its guidance and also in the preparation of any USPAB request.

 

Key points are as follows:

 

  • The applicant can only be a U.S. person/individual working abroad;
  • The authorization is limited to the provision of defense services by the applicant to his/her foreign employer or foreign parties on behalf of their employer;
  • No technical data or defense articles will be authorized for export under such authorization;
  • The inclusion of two provisos from DDTC for every USPAB authorization which validates the preceding statement;
  • The requirement to specifically identify in accordance with 22 CFR §§ 120.32(a)(1) or (3) the defense services being provided; and
  • The requirement to identify the applicant’s U.S. education or experience related to defense articles in the submission letter to be included with the submission.

 

Part 1 begins by stating that a USPAB is an individual U.S. Person as defined in § 120.62 who “…resides overseas, works for a foreign employer, and provides defense services as defined in § 120.32(a)(1) [furnishing of assistance (including training) to foreign persons, whether in the United States or abroad in the design, development, engineering, manufacture, production, assembly, testing, repair, maintenance, modification, operation, demilitarization, destruction, processing, or use of defense articles] and/or (3) [Military training of foreign units and forces…] to their employer or other foreign parties.”

 

Note the exclusion of § 120.32(a)(2), which is the furnishing of technical data to foreign persons.  This is because USPAB authorizations may authorize the provision of defense services only.  They do not authorize the export of defense articles or technical data.  Such authorization must be obtained under separate DDTC authorization.

 

Only the USPAB can be the applicant.  The employer is the foreign end user of the defense services.  A USPAB license authorization will allow a USPAB to provide defense services to their employer or other foreign persons (as defined in § 120.63) on behalf of their employer.  Any recipient of the defense services must be listed in the license authorization.

 

Due to the limitations stated above, every USPAB authorization will include the following two provisos from DDTC:

 

“This approval authorizes you to furnish defense services to your foreign employer and the foreign parties specifically identified in your application as needing to receive defense services from you. Should you need to furnish defense services to any other foreign parties, you must submit another request that specifically identifies these parties as recipients of defense services.”

 

And

 

“This approval does not authorize you to transfer ITAR-controlled technical data (as defined in 22 CFR 120.33). Any ITAR-controlled technical data used in connection with the activities authorized by this license must be the subject of a separate Department authorization.”

 

Note that the above provisos do not preclude the applicant from working with U.S.-origin ITAR technical data lawfully exported to their employer.

 

All USPAB authorizations (to include any provisos) will be sent in letter format to the applicant via email.

 

Part 2 identifies and enumerates the six elements of a USPAB authorization request as follows:

 

  • Form DS-6004 (the application form to use for the request)
  • Submission letter [Required and must be structured in accordance with Part 3 of the Guidance];
  • Resume;
  • Detailed job description (if not included in the submission letter);
  • ITAR § 126.13(a) certification (applicant must self-certify); and
  • Other supporting documentation.

 

This Part also specifically identifies that the applicant may have its submission prepared on its behalf by a third party (should be evidenced with written acknowledgment).

 

Part 3 breaks down the required submission letter into seven Sections.  Of note is Section 2, which requires that the applicant specifically tie their work back to one or more of the defense services defined in 120.32(a)(1) or (3).  To drive home this point, examples are provided as follows:

 

  • “I will be furnishing assistance in designing, developing, and maintaining the XXX defense article. As the project engineer, I will be …”

 

Or

  • “I will be training the Country X Air Force in the use of ….”

 

Applicants are reminded to be as descriptive as possible.

 

Part 4 provides direction on completing the DS-6004.

 

The Frequently Asked Questions (“FAQs”) associated with this Guidance are 21 questions ranging from whether registration is required to whether a USPAB authorization is required for a project that is the subject of a TAA.

 

A new guidance document, as well as a submission letter template and sample §126.13 certification letter for USPAB authorization requests, are located on the “Guidelines & Instructions” page of the DDTC website:

 

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_kb_article_page&sys_id=f9ccfe96dbb4130044f9ff621f961929 and https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_public_portal_news_and_events

 

*******

 

The U.S. Department Of State Published A Final Rule To Adjust Civil Monetary Penalties

 

January 11, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 1505: The U.S. Department of State published a final rule to adjust the civil monetary penalties (CMP) for regulatory provisions maintained and enforced by the Department of State. The revised CMP adjusts the amount of civil monetary penalties assessed by the Department of State based on the December 2022 Office of Management and Budget guidance and recent legislation. For penalties adjusted according to the December 2022 guidance, the new amounts will apply only to those penalties assessed on or after the effective date of this rule, regardless of the date on which the underlying facts or violations occurred. For the penalty adjusted according to recent legislation, the new amounts will apply only to those penalties assessed for violations occurring on or after December 27, 2022.

 

Citation in 22 CFR FY22 Max Penalties New (FY 23) Max Penalties
§ 35.3 $12,537 up to $376,138 $13,508 up to $405,270
§ 103.6(a)(1)
Prohibited Acts
$42,163 $45,429
§ 103.6(a)2)
Recordkeeping Violations
$8433 $9086
ITAR § 127.10(a)(1)(i) $1,272,251 the greater of $1,200,000 or the amount that is twice the value of the transaction that is the basis of the violation with respect to which the penalty is imposed
ITAR § 127.10(a)(1)(ii) $925,041,
or five times the amount of the prohibited payment, whichever is greater
$996,685,
or five times the amount of the prohibited payment, whichever is greater
ITAR § 127.10(a)(1)(iii) $1,101,061 $1,186,338
§ 138.400
First Offenders
$21,665 $23,343
§ 138.400 $22,021 up to $220,213 $23,727 up to $237,268

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/01/11/2023-00353/department-of-state-2023-civil-monetary-penalties-inflationary-adjustment

 

*******

Census Bureau

 

U.S. Customs And Border Protection (CBP) Deployed Additional Features As Part Of The Automated Commercial Environment

 

January 12, 2023: The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) deployed additional features as part of the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) Portal Modernization – Phase 3.

 

The References Tab has a new link to access the AEDirect portal titled “AES Direct UI”. Users should begin navigating to the AESDirect Portal using only the “AES Direct UI” link. Access through the “Legacy ACE” link will be discontinued in the future.

 

https://ace.cbp.gov/s/login/

*******

 

U.S. Customs And Border Protection (CBP) Published Tips On How To Resolve AES Response Messages

 

January 24, 2023: The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) published the following tips on how to resolve AES response messages.

 

When a shipment is filed to the AES, a system response message is generated and indicates whether the shipment has been accepted or rejected.  If the shipment is accepted, the AES filer receives an Internal Transaction Number (ITN) as confirmation.  Though the shipment is accepted, the filer may still receive a Verify Message, Compliance Alert, Informational Message, or Warning Message along with their ITN.  However, if the shipment is rejected, a Fatal Error notification is received and must be corrected to receive a valid ITN.

 

Response Code:  171

Narrative:      Transportation Reference Number Not Allowed for MOT

Severity:        Fatal

Reason:        The Transportation Reference Number is not allowed to be reported for the Mode of Transportation reported for this shipment.

 

Resolution:  A Transportation Reference Number is required for vessel shipments and allowed for air, rail or truck shipments. A Transportation Reference Number cannot be reported for a shipment using any other mode of transportation (i.e., mail, fixed, or other).

Verify the Mode of Transportation Code and Transportation Reference Number, correct the shipment, and resubmit.

 

Response Code:  501

Narrative:      Export Information Code Missing

Severity:        Fatal

Reason:        The Export Information Code was not reported.

 

Resolution:  An Export Information Code must be reported on every shipment. For a complete list of Export Information Codes, refer to ‘Appendix E – Commodity Filing Export Information’ of the AESTIR.

Verify the Export Information Code, correct the shipment, and resubmit.

 

It is important that AES filers correct Fatal Errors as soon as they are received to comply with Foreign Trade Regulations.  These errors must be corrected before export for shipments filed pre-departure and as soon as possible for shipments filed post-departure, but not later than five calendar days after departure.

*******

 

Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control

 

The Department Of The Treasury’s Office Of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) Adjusted For Inflation The Maximum Amount Of The Civil Monetary Penalties

 

 

January 12, 2023: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) amended its regulations to implement for 2023 the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, as amended by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015.  This regulatory amendment adjusts for inflation the maximum amount of the civil monetary penalties that may be assessed under relevant OFAC regulations.

 

Maximum CMP amounts for Relevant Statutes Statute Existing maximum Civil Monetary Penalties.

 

Statute Prior Maximum CMP Amount New Maximum CMP Amount
TWEA $97,529 $105,083
IEEPA $330,947 $356,579
AEDPA $87,361 $94,127
FNKDA $1,644,396 $1,771,754
CDTA $14,950 $16,108

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230112 and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/20230112_penalties_inflation.pdf

 

LATEST SANCTIONS, FINES & PENALTIES

 

This section of our newsletter provides information on the latest sanctions, fines, and penalties for export violations or matters of non-compliance with the ITAR or EAR issued by the US government enforcement agencies. It is provided as a service to exporters and associates of FD Associates to remind them of the importance of extreme due diligence in all international trade and export compliance matters, particularly those involving exports subject to the ITAR or the EAR. Don't let this happen to you or your company! Call us with questions or concerns at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net.

 

Sanctions

 

Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

 

The Commerce Department’s Bureau Of Industry And Security (BIS) Imposed Restrictions On Seven Iranian Drone Producers

 

January 31, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 6621: The Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) imposed restrictions on seven Iranian drone producers, including on transferring foreign-made components to them. These entities were added to the Entity List for contributing to Russia’s military and defense industrial base through the production of Iranian unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs or “drones”), which are being transferred to Russia for use in its war of aggression against Ukraine. The rule applies some of the Department’s most severe export restrictions on these entities, effectively cutting them off from legally accessing items made subject to U.S. jurisdiction. The action serves to further U.S. efforts to cut the Russian military off from the items and sources of support it needs to sustain its unjust and illegal war against Ukraine.

 

  • Design and Manufacturing of Aircraft Engines (DAMA);
  • Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Aerospace Force;
  • Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Research and Self-Sufficiency Jihad Organization;
  • Oje Parvaz Mado Nafar Company;
  • Paravar Pars Company;
  • Qods Aviation Industry; and
  • Shahed Aviation Industries.

 

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/about-bis/newsroom/press-releases/3213-iran-drones/file and https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/regulations-docs/federal-register-notices/federal-register-2023/3215-88-fr-6621/file

 

*******

 

Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

 

January 5, 2023: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated critical nodes of a key financial facilitation network of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), which included four individuals and two entities in Turkey, who have enabled the terrorist group’s recruitment and financial transfers to and from Iraq and Syria. This network played a key role in money management, transfer, and distribution for ISIS in the region. Concurrently, the Turkish Ministry of Treasury and Finance and the Ministry of Interior have implemented an asset freeze against members of this network.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Al-Juburi, Lu'ay Jasim Hammadi of Turkey;
  • Al-Khatuni, Abd Al Hamid Salim Ibrahim Ismail Brukan of Iraq;
  • Al-Khatuni, Muhammad Abdul Hamid Salim Brukan of Iraq;
  • Al-Khatuni, Umar Abdul Hamid Salim Brukan of Iraq.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Sham Express of Turkey;
  • Wadi Alrrafidayn For Foodstuffs of Turkey.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1181 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230105

 

*******

 

January 6, 2023: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has designated six executives and board members of U.S. designated Qods Aviation Industries (QAI), a key Iranian defense manufacturer responsible for the design and production of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).  Iran has transferred these UAVs for use in Russia’s unprovoked war of aggression in Ukraine. OFAC is also updating QAI’s entry on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) to include its new alias, Light Airplanes Design, and Manufacturing Industries. Finally, OFAC is designated the director of Iran’s Aerospace Industries Organization (AIO), the key organization responsible for overseeing Iran’s ballistic missile programs.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Arlanizadeh, Vali of Iran;
  • Damavandian, Ghassem of Iran;
  • Ghoreishi, Seyed Hojatollah of Iran;
  • Khaki, Reza of Iran;
  • Niyazi-Angili, Majid Reza of Iran;
  • Sharifi-Tehrani, Hamidreza of Iran;
  • Siavash, Nader Khoon of Iran.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1182 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230106

 

*******

 

January 9, 2023: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is issuing Venezuela-related General License 31B,"Certain Transactions Involving the IV Venezuelan National Assembly and Certain Other Persons."  OFAC also amends several Frequently Asked Questions (522, 547, 660, 679, and 680).

 

Venezuela-related General License 31B: U.S. persons are authorized to engage in all transactions prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 13884, as incorporated into the Venezuela Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 591 (the VSR), involving the IV Venezuelan National Assembly seated on January 5, 2016 (“IV National Assembly”); its Delegated Commission; any entity established by, or under the direction of, the IV National Assembly to exercise its mandate (“IV National Assembly Entity”); or any person appointed or designated by, or whose appointment or designation is retained by, the IV National Assembly, its Delegated Commission, or a IV National Assembly Entity, including their respective members and staff. U.S. persons are authorized to engage in all transactions prohibited by E.O. 13850, as amended by E.O. 13857, and incorporated into the VSR, involving any person appointed or designated by, or whose appointment or designation is retained by, the IV National Assembly, its Delegated Commission, or an IV National Assembly Entity to the board of directors (including an ad hoc board of directors) or as an executive officer of a Government of Venezuela entity (including entities owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by the Government of Venezuela). This general license does not authorize:

(1) Any transaction involving the Venezuelan National Constituent Assembly convened by Nicolas Maduro or the National Assembly seated on January 5, 2021, including their respective members and staff; or

(2) Any transaction otherwise prohibited by the VSR, including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the VSR other than the persons identified in paragraph (a) or (b) of this general license unless separately authorized.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/venezuela_gl31b.pdf

 

The following Venezuela Frequently Asked Questions (“FAQs”) are amended:

 

Question 522: Other than through the existing general licenses, under what circumstances might U.S. persons be authorized to deal in new debt of greater than 30 or 90 days issued by the Government of Venezuela?

 

Answer: In the Lima Declaration of August 8, 2017, 12 countries across the Americas refused to recognize the Constituent Assembly or the laws it adopts because of its illegitimate nature while at the same time fully backing the democratically elected IV Venezuelan National Assembly seated on January 5, 2016 (“IV National Assembly”). We stand in solidarity with our friends and allies in the region. If the democratically elected IV National Assembly approved a new debt issuance by the Government of Venezuela that Executive Order (E.O.) 13808 would prohibit U.S. persons from dealing in, the United States would consider using licensing authority to allow U.S. persons to deal in the issuance.

 

Question 547: Can U.S. Persons participate in meetings about restructuring outstanding Venezuelan and PDVSA debt?

 

Answer: U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions or dealings with persons named on OFAC’s SDN List, including dealing with an SDN in the context of efforts to restructure Venezuelan and Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PdVSA) debt.  Provided there is no SDN involvement, Venezuela-related General License 3 authorizes U.S. persons to engage in all transactions related to bonds specified in the Annex to General License 3, including participating in negotiations regarding such bonds. General License 3 does not authorize any transaction by a U.S. person or within the United States that involves the creation or subsequent dealing in new debt of PdVSA or debt otherwise of the Government of Venezuela with a maturity of greater than 90 days or 30 days, respectively, absent a license from OFAC.  OFAC would consider license applications involving any such new debt or equity on a case-by-case basis and base licensing determinations on the facts and circumstances of the particular application.  As stated in FAQ 522, the United States government would consider using licensing authority to allow U.S. persons to deal with new debt of the Government of Venezuela approved by the democratically elected IV Venezuelan National Assembly seated on January 5, 2016.

 

Question 660: When will sanctions be lifted on Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PdVSA) or any entity in which PdVSA owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest?

 

Answer: The path to sanctions relief for PdVSA and its subsidiaries is through the expeditious transfer of control of the company to a democratically elected government that is committed to taking concrete and meaningful actions to combat corruption, restore democracy, and respect human rights. A bona fide transfer of control will ensure that the assets of Venezuela are preserved for the country’s people rather than misused and diverted by former President Nicolas Maduro. Treasury will continue to use its economic tools to support the IV Venezuelan National Assembly seated on January 5, 2016, and the Venezuelan people’s efforts to restore their democracy.

 

Question 679: Executive Order (E.O.) 13884 of August 5, 2019, “Blocking Property of the Government of Venezuela,” blocks all property and interests in property of the Government of Venezuela. What does this mean for the IV Venezuelan National Assembly seated on January 5, 2016 (“IV National Assembly”)?

 

Answer: The United States stands with the Venezuelan people and the IV National Assembly in opposition to the Maduro regime. On January 09, 2023, OFAC issued Venezuela-related General License 31B authorizing all transactions involving the IV National Assembly, its Delegated Commission, any entity established by, or under the direction of, the IV National Assembly to exercise its mandate (“IV National Assembly Entity”), or involving any person appointed or designated by, or whose appointment or designation is retained by, the IV National Assembly, its Delegated Commission, or an IV National Assembly Entity, to act on behalf of the Government of Venezuela, including their respective members and staff, that are otherwise prohibited by E.O. 13884. The authorization also covers transactions prohibited by E.O. 13850, as amended, with respect to any person appointed or designated by, or whose appointment or designation is retained by, the IV National Assembly, its Delegated Commission, or an IV National Assembly Entity to the board of directors (including an ad hoc board of directors) or as an executive officer of a Government of Venezuela entity (including entities owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by the Government of Venezuela).

 

Effective January 09, 2023, General License 31B replaced and superseded General License 31A in its entirety.

 

Question 680: Does the blocking of the Government of Venezuela impact the ability of U.S. persons to transact with the Government of Venezuela, or persons in which the Government of Venezuela owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest?

 

Answer: Yes. Unless exempt or authorized by OFAC, all property, and interests in property of persons meeting the definition of the Government of Venezuela (see section 6(d) of E.O. 13884​ of August 5, 2019) that are in or come within the United States or the possession or control of a United States person are blocked, pursuant to E.O. 13884. The term “Government of Venezuela,” as defined in E.O. 13884, includes the state and Government of Venezuela, any political subdivision, agency, or instrumentality thereof, including the Central Bank of Venezuela and Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PdVSA), any person owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by the foregoing, and any person who has acted or purported to act directly or indirectly for or on behalf of, any of the foregoing, including as a member of the Maduro regime.

 

OFAC has issued several General Licenses (GLs) that provide authorization for categories of persons blocked by E.O. 13884. GL 34A authorizes transactions with certain Government of Venezuela individuals, including United States citizens; permanent resident aliens of the United States; individuals who have a valid U.S. immigrant or nonimmigrant visa, other than individuals in the United States as part of Venezuela’s mission to the United Nations; former employees and contractors of the Government of Venezuela; and current employees and contractors of the Government of Venezuela who provide health or education services in Venezuela, including at hospitals, schools, and universities. In addition, GL 22 authorizes certain transactions related to Venezuela’s mission to the United Nations, and GL 31B provides authorization related to the IV Venezuelan National Assembly seated on January 5, 2016 (“IV National Assembly”). Please see FAQ 679 regarding the scope of GL 31B. Without authorization from OFAC, U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with the Government of Venezuela, or persons in which the Government of Venezuela owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest. U.S. persons are not prohibited from engaging in transactions involving the country or people of Venezuela, provided blocked persons or any conduct prohibited by any other Executive order imposing sanctions measures related to the situation in Venezuela are not involved.

 

Please note that persons meeting the definition of Government of Venezuela and persons that are owned, directly or indirectly, 50 percent or more by the Government of Venezuela are blocked pursuant to E.O. 13884, regardless of whether the person appears on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons list (SDN List), unless exempt or authorized by OFAC.

 

As a general matter, OFAC expects financial institutions to conduct due diligence on their own direct customers (including, for example, their ownership structure) to confirm that those customers are not persons whose property and interests in property are blocked. For other types of transactions where a financial institution acts solely as an intermediary and fails to block transactions involving a sanctions target, OFAC will consider the totality of the circumstances surrounding the bank’s processing of the transaction to determine what, if any, regulatory response is appropriate.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/updated/2023-01-09 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230109

 

*******

 

January 11, 2023: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing one new Iran-related Frequently Asked Question (FAQ 1110) and amending several Iran-related Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs 337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 348, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, and 853).

 

Question 1110: What are key changes made by Iran General License D-2 in comparison to Iran General License D-1?

 

Answer: On September 23, 2022, OFAC issued Iran General License (GL) D-2 to further support the provision of communication tools to ordinary Iranians and assist in their efforts to resist repressive internet censorship and surveillance tools deployed by the Iranian government.  GL D-2, which supersedes GL D-1, both expands and clarifies the authorizations in GL D-1 and section 560.540 of the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR 560 (ITSR), with respect to the exportation and reexportation, directly or indirectly, from the United States or by a U.S. person, of certain software and services incident to the exchange of communications over the internet.  See FAQ 344 for additional information on how the authorizations in GL D-2 compare to section 560.540 of the ITSR.

Since GL D-1 was issued on February 7, 2014, the types of software and services that support communication over the internet have changed.  To reflect technological developments in communication-related software and services since the issuance of GL D-1 (including in cloud-based services), OFAC issued GL D-2 to expand and clarify the range of U.S. software and services available to Iranians under OFAC’s sanctions program.  For example, GL D-2 explicitly authorizes certain types of software and services for exportation or reexportation to Iran that are incident to communications over the internet, including cloud-based software and services.

 

GL D-2 expands and clarifies the pre-existing authorizations in several ways, including by making the following changes:

  • Removing the “personal” qualifier from the prior authorizations relating to “personal communications,” which resulted in compliance burdens for companies seeking to verify the personal nature of the communications supported by their software or services;
  • Expanding and clarifying the list of examples of communication tools within the authorizations in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) to include:  social media platforms, collaboration platforms, video conferencing, e-gaming, e-learning platforms, automated translation, web maps, and user authentication services, as well as cloud-based software and services in support of the foregoing, or of any other activity authorized or exempt under the ITSR;
  • Expanding the authorization in paragraph (a)(2) for software incident to the exchange of communications over the internet to include software that enables services incident to the exchange of communications over the internet (including cloud-based services);
  • Clarifying that the authorization in paragraph (a)(4) for the export or reexport of non-commercial grade internet connectivity services includes cloud-based services; and
  • Expanding the case-by-case licensing policy for activity not authorized by the general license or exempt to include additional services that support internet freedom in Iran, such as certain activities relating to the development and hosting of anti-surveillance software by Iranian software developers.  Such services would also include, for example, the development and hosting of anti-censoring software by Iranian software developers and the exportation of certain software development tools to Iranians seeking to create their own anti-surveillance or anti-censorship apps and upload them to mobile app sites.

 

See the following link for updates to FAQs 337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 348, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, and 853: https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/updated/2023-01-11.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230111 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/1110

 

*******

 

January 12, 2023: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued Counter Terrorism General License 21B "Authorizing Limited Safety and Environmental Transactions Involving Certain Vessels," and is amending one Counter Terrorism-related Frequently Asked Question (1097).

 

Counter Terrorism General License 21B: All transactions that are ordinarily incident and necessary to one of the following activities involving the persons or vessels described below in this general license that are prohibited by the Global Terrorism Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 594 (GTSR), are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, April 13, 2023, provided that any payment to a blocked person must be made into a blocked account in accordance with the GTSR:

(1) The safe docking and anchoring of any of the blocked vessels listed below this general license (“blocked vessels”) in port;

(2) The preservation of the health or safety of the crew of any of the blocked vessels; and

(3) Emergency repairs of any of the blocked vessels or environmental mitigation or protection activities relating to any of the blocked vessels.

 

The authorization above of this general license applies to the following blocked persons and vessels listed on the Office of Foreign Assets Control’s Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List and any entity in which any of the following persons own, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest:

 

  • Artemov, Victor Sergioyovich
    • BOCEANICA, IMO 9267132
    • ZEPHYR I (f.k.a. ZHEN I), IMO 9255880
  • Azul Vista Shipping Corp.
    • JULIA A (f.k.a. AZUL), IMO 9236353
  • Blue Berri Shipping Inc.
    • RAIN DROP, IMO 9233208
  • Harbour Ship Management Limited
    • B LUMINOSA, IMO 9256016
    • BLUEFINS, IMO 9221657
    • BUENO, IMO 9282443
  • Pontus Navigation Corp.
    • NOLAN (f.k.a. OSLO), IMO 9179701
  • Technology Bright International Ltd.
    • YOUNG YONG, IMO 9194127
  • Triton Navigation Corp.
    • ADISA, IMO 9304667
  • Vista Clara Shipping Corp.
    • LARA I (f.k.a. CLARA), IMO 9231767

 

Question 1097: What does Counterterrorism-related General License 21B (GL 21B) authorize?

 

Answer: GL 21B authorizes all activities otherwise prohibited by the Global Terrorism Sanctions Regulations (GTSR), 31 CFR part 594, that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the limited safety and environmental activities described in paragraph (a) of GL 21B involving certain blocked persons and vessels through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, April 13, 2023.  GL 21B does not authorize the offloading of any cargo onboard any of the blocked vessels listed in GL 21B, and any payment of claims to or for the benefit of any blocked persons or vessels would require a specific license from OFAC.

After the expiration of GL 21B, U.S. persons will be prohibited from engaging in any transactions with the blocked persons or vessels listed in GL 21B, unless otherwise exempt or authorized by OFAC.  U.S. persons unable to conclude transactions authorized by GL 21B before 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, April 13, 2023, are encouraged to seek guidance from OFAC.

 

Non-U.S. persons, including foreign financial institutions, generally do not risk exposure to sanctions for engaging in transactions with blocked persons where those transactions would not require a specific license if engaged in by a U.S. person.  Non-U.S. persons unable to conclude transactions authorized by GL 21B before 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, April 13, 2023, are encouraged to seek guidance from OFAC.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230112_33 and  https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/ct_gl21b.pdf and

 

*******

 

January 17, 2023: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is issuing Russia-related General License 6C "Transactions Related to Agricultural Commodities, Medicine, Medical Devices, Replacement Parts and Components, or Software Updates, the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic, or Clinical Trials", Russia-related General License 54A "Authorizing Certain Transactions Involving VEON Ltd. or VEON Holdings B.V. Prohibited by Executive Order 14071", and Russia-related General License 28B "Authorizing the Wind-Down and Rejection of Certain Transactions Involving Public Joint Stock Company Transkapitalbank and Afghanistan".  OFAC also amends four Russia-related Frequently Asked Questions (982, 1054, 1055, and 1059).

 

Russia-related General License 6C: All transactions prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587, related to: (1) the production, manufacturing, sale, transport, or provision of agricultural commodities, agricultural equipment, medicine, medical devices, replacement parts and components for medical devices, or software updates for medical devices; (2) the prevention, diagnosis, or treatment of COVID-19 (including research or clinical studies relating to COVID-19); or (3) clinical trials and other medical research activities are authorized. For the purposes of this general license, agricultural commodities, medicine, and medical devices are defined as follows:

(1) Agricultural commodities. For the purposes of this general license, agricultural commodities are products that fall within the term “agricultural commodity” as defined in section 102 of the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 (7 U.S.C. 5602) and are intended for use as (i) Food for humans (including raw, processed, and packaged foods; live animals; vitamins and minerals; food additives or supplements; and bottled drinking water) or animals (including animal feeds); (ii) Seeds for food crops; (iii) Fertilizers or organic fertilizers; or (iv) Reproductive materials (such as live animals, fertilized eggs, embryos, and semen) for the production of food animals.

(2) Medicine. For the purposes of this general license, medicine is an item that falls within the definition of the term “drug” in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321).

(3) Medical devices. For the purposes of this general license, a medical device is an item that falls within the definition of “device” in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321).

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl6c.pdf

 

Russia Related General License 54A: All transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the purchase or receipt of any debt or equity securities of VEON Ltd. or VEON Holdings B.V. that are prohibited by section 1(a)(i) of Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 are authorized, provided that the debt or equity securities were issued before June 6, 2022. Note: Except as provided below, all transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to facilitating, clearing, and settling of transactions authorized by the above that is prohibited by section 1(a)(i) of E.O. 14071 are authorized. This general license does not authorize any transactions otherwise prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR), including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the RuHSR, unless separately authorized. Effective January 17, 2023, General License No. 54, dated November 18, 2022, is entirely replaced and superseded by this General License No. 54A.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl54a.pdf

 

Russia Related General License 28B: All transactions that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind-down of transactions involving Public Joint Stock Company Transkapitalbank (TKB), or any entity in which TKB owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest (collectively, “TKB entities”), that are ultimately destined for or originating from Afghanistan and prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, March 18, 2023, provided that any payment to any TKB entity is made into a blocked account in accordance with the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR).

 

Note: The transactions authorized above include the wind-down and closure of correspondent accounts operated by U.S. financial institutions on behalf of TKB entities, provided any remaining funds or assets in the correspondent account to be paid to any TKB entity are placed in a blocked account. U.S. persons are authorized to reject, rather than block, all transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the processing of funds ultimately destined for or originating from Afghanistan involving one or more TKB entities as an originating, intermediary or beneficiary financial institution and prohibited by E.O. 14024 through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, March 18, 2023.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl28b.pdf and

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230117

 

*******

 

January 17, 2023: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued Venezuela-related General License 5J, "Authorizing Certain Transactions Related to the Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. 2020 8.5 Percent Bond on or After April 20, 2023". OFAC also amended Venezuela-related Frequently Asked Question 595.

 

Venezuela-related General License 5J: On or after April 20, 2023, all transactions related to the provision of financing for and other dealings in the Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. 2020 8.5 Percent Bond that would be prohibited by subsection l(a)(iii) of Executive Order (E.O.) 13835 of May 21, 2018, as amended by E.O. 13857 of January 25, 2019, and incorporated into the Venezuela Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 591 (the VSR), are authorized. This general license does not authorize any transactions or activities otherwise prohibited by the VSR or any other part of 31 CFR chapter V. Effective January 17, 2023, General License No. 5I, dated January 20, 2022, is replaced and superseded in its entirety by this General License No. 5J.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230117_33 and

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/venezuela_gl5j.pdf

 

*******

 

January 17, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 2522: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has published two general licenses (GLs) issued pursuant to the Global Magnitsky Sanctions Regulations: GLs 3 and 4, each of which was previously made available on OFAC's website. GLs 3 and 4 were issued on December 9, 2022. See December 2022 newsletter for details on the GLs.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/01/17/2023-00348/publication-of-global-magnitsky-sanctions-regulations-web-general-licenses-3-and-4

 

*******

 

January 19, 2023: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) made the following deletions to its SDN List:

 

  • Khalifeh, Hanna Elias of Lebanon.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230119

 

*******

 

January 23, 2023: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Cooperative Foundation and five of its board members, the Deputy Minister of Intelligence and Security, and four senior IRGC commanders in Iran under human rights authorities. These actions, in coordination with the United Kingdom and European Union, target a key economic pillar of the IRGC, which funds much of the regime’s brutal suppression, as well as senior security officials coordinating Tehran’s crackdown at the national and provincial levels.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Ala'Oddini, Yahya of Iran;
  • Asiabani, Kourosh of Iran;
  • Azimi, Mohammad Nazar of Iran;
  • Babamoradi, Jamal of Iran;
  • Fada, Mojtaba of Iran;
  • Karimi, Ahmad of Iran;
  • Norouzi, Aliasghar of Iran;
  • Rashedi, Naser of Iran;
  • Tabatabai, Seyyed Aminollah Emami of Iran; and
  • Tanavar, Hossein of Iran.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1209 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230123

 

********

 

January 24, 2023: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)  designated several individuals and associated entities for facilitating financial activities for Hizballah. At the center of this network is Lebanese money exchanger and so-called financial expert Hassan Moukalled, who plays a key role in enabling Hizballah to continue to exploit and exacerbate Lebanon’s economic crisis. Treasury also designated CTEX Exchange, a money service business owned by Hassan Moukalled, in addition to Hassan Moukalled’s sons, Rayyan Moukalled and Rani Moukalled, who facilitate Hassan Moukalled and his company’s financial activities in support of Hizballah. 

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Moukalled, Hassan Ahmed of Lebanon;
  • Moukalled, Rani Hassan of Lebanon;
  • Moukalled, Rayyan Hassan of Lebanon.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • CTEX Exchange of Lebanon;
  • Lebanese Company For Information And Studies SARL of Lebanon; and
  • Lebanese Company For Publishing, Media, And Research of Lebanon.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1211 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230124

 

*******

 

January 26, 2023: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) took additional actions to degrade the Russian Federation’s capacity to wage war against Ukraine by sanctioning eight individuals and 16 entities and four aircraft.  These actions, concurrent with additional sanctions actions by the Department of State, target the infrastructure that supports battlefield operations in Ukraine, including producers of Russia’s weapons and those administering Russian-occupied areas of Ukraine.  Notably, these actions include the designation of persons that support Russian defense-related entities, including PMC Wagner (Wagner Group).

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

  • Adonev, Sergei Nikolaevich of Israel;
  • Adonyev, Filipp Sergeevich of the United Kingdom and Russia;
  • Adonyev, Luka Sergeevich of the United Kingdom, Bulgaria and Russia;
  • Batekhin, Sergey Leonidovich of Russia;
  • Bezrukikh, Dmitriy Nikolaevich of Russia;
  • Burov, Andrey Vladimirovich of Russia;
  • Cartes Jara, Horacio Manuel of Paraguay;
  • Gostev, Arkadiy Aleksandrovich of Russia;
  • Ivanov, Aleksandr Aleksandrovich of Russia;
  • Kharichev, Aleksandr Dmitrievich of Russia;
  • Lushnikov, Alan Valeryevich of Russia;
  • Malyarevich, Aleksei Alekseevich of Russia;
  • Manturov, Denis Valentinovich of Russia;
  • Minnikhanov, Rustam Nurgaliyevich of Russia, France and the United Arab Emirates;
  • Minnikhanova, Gulsina Akhatovna Russia, France and the United Arab Emirates;
  • Novikov, Yan Valentinovich of Russia;
  • Rapoport, Boris Yakovlevich of Russia;
  • Velazquez Moreno, Hugo Adalberto, Asuncion of Paraguay;
  • Zakharov, Valery Nikolayevichof the Central African Republic and Russia.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Africa Politology;
  • Aktsionernoye Obshchestvo 179 Sudoremontnyy Zavod;
  • Aktsionernoye Obshchestvo 30 Sudoremontnyy Zavod;
  • Aktsionernoye Obshchestvo Dalnevostochnyy Tsentr Sudostroyeniya I Sudoremonta;
  • Aktsionernoye Obshchestvo Dalnevostochnyy Zavod Zvezda;
  • Aktsionernoye Obshchestvo Severo-Vostochnyy Remontnyy Tsentr;
  • Aktsionernoye Obshchestvo Tsentr Sudoremonta Dalzavod;
  • Aktsionernoye Obshchestvo Tsentralnoye Konstruktorskoye Byuro Lazurit;
  • Aktsionernoye Obshchestvo Vladivostokskoye Predpriyatie Elektroradioavtimatika;
  • AO Ural Civil Aviation Factory;
  • Bebidas USA Inc.;
  • Changsha Tianyi Space Science And Technology Research Institute CO. LTD;
  • Dominicana Acquisition S.A.;
  • Federal State Unitary Enterprise Scientific And Production Enterprise Gamma;
  • Frigorifico Chajha S.A.E.;
  • International Limited Liability Company Interros Capital;
  • Joint Stock Company National Aviation Service Company;
  • Joint Stock Company Research And Production Concern BARL;
  • Joint Stock Company Terra Tech;
  • JSC Aviacon Zitotrans;
  • Kratol Aviation;
  • Limited Liability Company Charter Green Light Moscow;
  • Limited Liability Company Kaleidoskop;
  • Limited Liability Company TKKH-Invest;
  • LLC Research & Production Enterprise Prima;
  • MK Interros Invest;
  • Obshchestvo S Ogranichennoi Otvetstvennostyu Luchano;
  • Obshchestvo S Organichennoy Otvetstvennostyu Dalnevostochnyy Proektnyy Institut Vostokproektverf;
  • Officer's Union For International Security;
  • Prime Security And Development;
  • Saltcliff Trading Limited;
  • Sewa Security Services;
  • Spacety Luxembourg S.A.;
  • Tabacos USA Inc.;
  • Whiteleave Holdings Limited.

 

The following vessels have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Addiction (9HA4571) Yacht Malta flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 1010193; and
  • Anatta (ZGB15) Yacht Cayman Islands flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 1011159.

 

The following aircraft have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • RA-76502; Aircraft Model IL-76TD; Aircraft Tail Number RA-76502;
  • RA-76842; Aircraft Model IL-76TD; Aircraft Tail Number RA-76842;
  • RA-76846; Aircraft Model IL-76TD; Aircraft Tail Number RA-76846;
  • RA-78765; Aircraft Model IL-76TD; Aircraft Tail Number RA-78765; and
  • S5-SAD; Aircraft Model Bombardier Global 6000; Aircraft Manufacturer's Serial Number (MSN) 9553.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1220 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230126

 

*******

 

January 26, 2023: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued Global Magnitsky Sanctions Regulations General License 5 and General License 6.

 

General License 5: All transactions prohibited by the Global Magnitsky Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 583 (GMSR), that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the divestment or transfer, or the facilitation of the divestment or transfer, of debt or equity of Frigorifico Chajha S.A.E. (Frigorifico Chajha), to a non-U.S. person are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, March 27, 2023. All transactions prohibited by the GMSR that are ordinarily incident and necessary to facilitating, clearing, and settling trades of debt or equity of Frigorifico Chajha that were placed before 4:00 p.m. eastern standard time, January 26, 2023, are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, March 27, 2023. All transactions prohibited by the GMSR that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind-down of derivative contracts entered into before 4:00 p.m. eastern standard time, January 26, 2023, that (i) include Frigorifico Chajha as a counterparty or (ii) are linked to the debt or equity of Frigorifico Chajha are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, March 27, 2023, provided that any payments to a blocked person are made into a blocked account in accordance with the GMSR.

 

This general license does not authorize: (1) U.S. persons to sell, or to facilitate the sale of, debt or equity of Frigorifico Chajha to, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked; or (2) U.S. persons to purchase or invest in, or to facilitate the purchase of or investment in, directly or indirectly, debt or equity of Frigorifico Chajha, other than purchases of or investments in debt or equity of Frigorifico Chajha that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the divestment or transfer of debt or equity of Frigorifico Chajha, as described in this general license. This general license does not authorize any transactions otherwise prohibited by the GMSR, including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the GMSR other than Frigorifico Chajha, unless separately authorized.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/glomag_gl5.pdf

 

General License 6: All transactions prohibited by the Global Magnitsky Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 583 (GMSR), that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind-down of any transaction involving Bebidas USA Inc., Tabacos USA Inc., Frigorifico Chajha S.A.E., or Dominicana Acquisition S.A. (collectively, the “designated Cartes entities”), or any entity in which Horacio Manuel Cartes Jara or the designated Cartes entities own, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest, are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, March 27, 2023, provided that any payment to a blocked person must be made into a blocked account in accordance with the GMSR.

 

This general license does not authorize any transactions otherwise prohibited by the GMSR, including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the GMSR other than the blocked entities described in paragraph (a) of this general license, unless separately authorized.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/glomag_gl6.pdf

 

********

 

January 26, 2023: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued Global Magnitsky Sanctions Frequently Asked Questions.

 

Question 1111: What does Global Magnitsky General License 5 Authorizing Certain Transactions Related to Frigorifico Chajha S.A.E. authorize?

 

Answer: On January 26, 2023, OFAC designated Frigorifico Chajha S.A.E. (Frigorifico Chajha), pursuant to E.O. 13818.  Concurrent with this action, OFAC issued General License (GL) 5, which authorizes certain transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the divestment or transfer, or the facilitation of the divestment or transfer, of debt or equity of Frigorifico Chajha to a non-U.S. person, through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, March 27, 2023.

 

GL 5 also authorizes certain transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to facilitating, clearing, and settling trades of debt or equity of Frigorifico Chajha that were placed before 4:00 p.m. eastern standard time, January 26, 2023, through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, March 27, 2023.

 

GL 5 also authorizes certain transactions that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind-down of derivative contracts entered into before 4:00 p.m. eastern standard time, January 26, 2023, that (1) include Frigorifico Chajha as a counterparty, or (2) are linked to the debt or equity of Frigorifico Chajha, through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, March 27, 2023, provided that any payments to a blocked person are made into a blocked account in accordance with the Global Magnitsky Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 583.

 

However, GL 5 does not authorize U.S. persons to sell or to facilitate the sale of debt or equity of Frigorifico Chajha to, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked.  GL 5 also does not authorize U.S. persons to purchase or invest in, or to facilitate the purchase of or investment in, directly or indirectly, debt or equity of Frigorifico Chajha, other than purchases of or investments in debt or equity of Frigorifico Chajha that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the divestment or transfer of debt or equity of Frigorifico Chajha as described in GL 5.

Non-U.S. persons generally do not risk exposure to U.S. sanctions for engaging in activities that would be exempt or authorized for U.S. persons pursuant to GL 5.

 

Question 1112: What does Global Magnitsky General License 6 Authorizing the Wind Down of Transactions Involving Bebidas USA Inc., Tabacos USA Inc., Frigorifico Chajha S.A.E., Dominicana Acquisition S.A., or Certain Blocked Entities Owned by Horacio Manuel Cartes Jara authorize? 

 

Answer: On January 26, 2023, OFAC designated, pursuant to E.O. 13818, Horacio Manuel Cartes Jara (Cartes) for his involvement in corruption in Paraguay.  Also on that day, OFAC designated four entities owned or controlled by Cartes, pursuant to E.O. 13818:  Tabacos USA Inc., Bebidas USA Inc., Dominicana Acquisition S.A., and Frigorifico Chajha S.A.E. (collectively, “designated Cartes entities”).  Concurrent with this action, OFAC issued Global Magnitsky General License (GL) 6 , which authorizes, subject to certain conditions, transactions prohibited by the Global Magnitsky Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 583 (GMSR), that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind-down of any transaction involving any of the designated Cartes entities, or any entity in which Cartes or the designated Cartes entities own, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest (collectively, “blocked Cartes entities”), through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, March 27, 2023, provided that any payment to a blocked person must be made into a blocked account in accordance with the GMSR.  GL 6 does not authorize any transactions involving Cartes himself.

 

After the expiration of this general authorization, U.S. persons will be prohibited from engaging in such wind-down transactions with blocked Cartes entities unless exempt or otherwise authorized by OFAC.  U.S. persons unable to wind down transactions with blocked Cartes entities before 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, March 27, 2023, are encouraged to seek guidance from OFAC.

 

Non-U.S. persons may wind down transactions with blocked Cartes entities without exposure to sanctions under E.O. 13818, provided that such wind-down activity is consistent with GL 6.  Wind-down transactions involving non-U.S. persons may be processed through the U.S. financial system or involve U.S. persons as long as the transactions comply with the terms and conditions in GL 6.  Non-U.S. persons unable to wind down transactions with blocked Cartes entities before 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, March 27, 2023, are encouraged to seek guidance from OFAC.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/added/2023-01-26

 

*******

 

January 30, 2023:  The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated the leader of a Mexico-based network and two associates pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14059 for procuring precursor chemicals to manufacture and traffic illicit fentanyl and other synthetic drugs to the United States. These actions result from ongoing efforts by U.S. agencies to disrupt the importation into and distribution of illicit fentanyl within the United States. These actions were coordinated closely with the government of Mexico and would not have been possible without the cooperation and support of the Drug Enforcement Administration.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Rivera Zazueta, Jose Angel of Mexico;
  • Santiso Aguila, Nelton of Mexico; and
  • Yang Lopez, Jason Antonio of Guatemala.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1229 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230130

 

*******

 

January 31, 2023: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated six individuals and three entities connected to Burma’s military regime pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14014. This action occurred in conjunction with actions taken by both the United Kingdom and Canada.

 

On February 1, 2021, Burma’s military overthrew the democratically elected government and removed the civilian government leaders from power, including President Win Myint and State Counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi. Over the past two years, the military has continued to use violence and oppression to deny the people of Burma the ability to choose their own leaders. Burma’s military regime has used its military aircraft to conduct aerial bombings and other attacks against pro-democracy forces, killing and displacing countless civilians.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Aung, Htun of Burma;
  • Min, Aung of Burma;
  • Min, Than of Burma;
  • Oo, Myo Myint of Burma;
  • Swe, Hla of Burma; and
  • Tay Za, Htoo Htwe of Burma.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Mining Enterprise No 1;
  • Mining Enterprise NO 2; and
  • Union Election Commission.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1233 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20230131

 

*******

U.S. Department of Treasury

 

January 18, 2023: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued an order identifying the virtual currency exchange Bitzlato Limited (Bitzlato) as a “primary money laundering concern” in connection with Russian illicit finance pursuant to section 9714(a) of the Combatting Russian Money Laundering Act, as amended.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1193

 

*******

 

U.S. Department of State

 

January 26, 2023: The United States will continue to impede the Kremlin’s ability to arm and equip its war machine engaged in an unjustified war against Ukraine.  The Department of State designated five entities and one individual linked to the Wagner Group and its head, Yevgeniy Prigozhin.  Additionally, the Department designated nine individuals and 14 entities for their status as government officials, their involvement in the extended networks of designated persons, and/or for being part of Russia’s military-industrial complex.  Finally, the Department identified two yachts and one aircraft as blocked property.  All targets are designated pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14024, which authorizes sanctions with respect to specified harmful foreign activities of the Government of the Russian Federation.

 

Infrastructure And Operations Of The Wagner Group:

  • Charter Green Light Moscow;
  • Aleksei Alekseevich Malyarevich;
  • Africa Politology;
  • Prime Security And Development;
  • Sewa Security Services;
  • Officers Union For International Security;

 

Russian Government Officials:

 

The following three Russian Federal Penitentiary Service officials have been identified as having facilitated the recruitment of Russian prisoners into the Wagner Group.  These individuals are being designated for being persons who are or have been leaders, officials, senior executive officers, or members of the board of directors of the Government of the Russian Federation:

 

  • Dmitriy Nikolaevich Bezrukikh;
  • Arkadiy Aleksandrovich Gostev; And
  • Ivan Pavlovitch Prokopenko.

 

Russian Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Industry and Trade Denis Valentinovich Manturov is being designated for being a leader, official, senior executive officer, or member of the board of directors of the Government of the Russian Federation. Manturov oversees Russia’s defense industry and the production of war materiel for Russia’s use in Ukraine.

 

The Chairman of the Election Commission of the Rostov Region, Andrey Vladimirovich Burov, is designated for being a leader, official, senior executive officer, or member of the board of directors of the Government of the Russian Federation.  Burov is responsible for facilitating illegitimate referendums in the occupied regions of Ukraine.

Vladimir Potanin’s Network:

 

Vladimir Olegovich Potanin, one of Russia’s wealthiest oligarchs, was designated alongside members of his network on December 15, 2022. The Department of State designated four additional entities in Potanin’s network:

 

  • Mk Interros Invest;
  • Whiteleave Holdings Limited (Whiteleave):
  • Saltcliff Trading Limited (Saltcliff);
  • International Limited Liability Company Interros Capital (Interros Capital).

 

Additionally, the Department of State designated Sergey Leonidovich Batekhin, the CEO of Interros, for being or having been a leader, official, senior executive officer, or member of the board of directors of Kholdingovaya Kompaniya Interros OOO (Interros), an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to Section 1(a)(i). Interros was founded by Vladimir Potanin.

 

Businessman Adonev And His Network:

 

Sergei Nikolaevich Adonev is a businessman in Russia who acts as a financier to Russian President Vladimir Putin and Rostec State Corporation head Sergei Chemezov.

  • Limited Liability Company Kaleidoskop;
  • Sergei Nikolaevich Adonev;
  • Filipp Sergeevich Adonyev;
  • Luka Sergeevich Adonyev;
  • The Yacht Addiction is identified as blocked property in which Sergei Nikolaevich Adonev has an interest.
  • The yacht Anatta is dentified as blocked property in which Sergei Nikolaevich Adonev has an interest.
  • The aircraft S5-SAD is identified as blocked property in which Sergei Nikolaevich Adonev has an interest.

 

Entities Supporting Russia’s Military Industrial Complex:

 

  • Aktsionernoye Obshchestvo Dalnevostochnyy Tsentr Sudostroyeniya I Sudoremonta (AO DTSSS);
  • Aktsionernoye Obshchestvo Tsentr Sudoremonta Dalzavod;
  • Aktsionernoye Obshchestvo Severo-Vostochnyy Remontnyy Tsentr;
  • Aktsionernoye Obshchestvo Dalnevostochnyy Zavod Zvezda;
  • Aktsionernoye Obshchestvo 179 Sudoremontnyy Zavod;
  • Aktsionernoye Obshchestvo 30 Sudoremontnyy Zavod;
  • Obshchestvo S Organichennoy Otvetstvennostyu Dalnevostochnyy Proektnyy Institut Vostokproektverf;
  • Aktsionernoye Obshchestvo Vladivostokskoye Predpriyatie Elektroradioavtomatika; and
  • Aktsionernoye Obshchestvo Tsentralnoye Konstruktorskoye Byuro Lazurit.

 

Visa Restrictions:

 

The Department of State imposed visa restrictions on 531 members of the Russian Federation military for actions that threaten or violate the sovereignty, territorial integrity, or political independence of Ukraine pursuant to Section 212(a)(3)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

 

Sanctions Implications:

 

As a result of these actions, all property and interests in property of the individuals above that are in the United States or in the possession or control of U.S. persons are blocked and must be reported to OFAC.  In addition, any entities that are owned, directly or indirectly, 50 percent or more by one or more blocked persons are also blocked.  All transactions by U.S. persons or within (or transiting) the United States that involve any property or interests in property of designated or blocked persons are prohibited unless authorized by a general or specific license issued by OFAC, or exempt. These prohibitions include the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any blocked person and the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

 

https://www.state.gov/actions-to-counter-wagner-and-degrade-russias-war-efforts-in-ukraine/

 

 

Fines and Penalties

 

January 3, 2023: Xiaoqing Zheng, 59, of Niskayuna, New York, was sentenced to 24 months in prison for conspiring to steal General Electric (GE) trade secrets, knowing or intending to benefit the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Zheng was convicted of conspiracy to commit economic espionage, following a four-week jury trial that ended on March 31, 2022. According to court documents, Zheng was employed at GE Power in Schenectady, New York, as an engineer specializing in turbine sealing technology. He worked at GE from 2008 until the summer of 2018. The trial evidence demonstrated that Zheng and others in China conspired to steal GE’s trade secrets surrounding GE’s ground-based and aviation-based turbine technologies, knowing or intending to benefit the PRC and one or more foreign instrumentalities, including China-based companies and universities that research, develop, and manufacture parts for turbines. Zheng was sentenced to pay a $7,500 fine and serve one year of post-imprisonment supervised release.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-ge-power-engineer-sentenced-conspiracy-commit-economic-espionage

 

January 5, 2023: The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has issued an Order denying the export privileges of Nathan Christopher Ball until November 26, 2024. On November 6, 2019, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico, Nathan Christopher Ball (Ball) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 371 and 18 U.S.C. § 554(a). Specifically, Ball was convicted of conspiring to smuggle from the US to Mexico, firearms and ammunition without the required license or written authorization. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Ball to 27 months of confinement, two years of supervised release, a $300 assessment, and $50,000 criminal fine.

 

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/export-violations-2022/1439-e2780/file

January 5, 2023: The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has issued an Order denying the export privileges of Hany Veletanlic until January 27, 2030. On January 27, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, Hany Veletanlic (Veletanlic) was convicted of violating Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C § 2778) (AECA). Specifically, Veletanlic was convicted of willfully exporting from the US to Sweden defense articles designated on the United States Munitions List, namely a Glock lower 23 receiver, without having obtained from the United States Department of State a license or written approval for the export of the defense article. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Veletanlic to 85 months of confinement, three years of supervised release, and a $400 assessment.

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/export-violations-2022/1440-e2781/file

 

January 5, 2023: The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has issued an Order denying the export privileges of Mauricio Robles until December 1, 2028. On December 1, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Mauricio Robles (Robles) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 554(a). Specifically, Robles was convicted of smuggling and attempting to smuggle from the US to Mexico 1,680 rounds of 5.56mm ammunition, 1,000 rounds of 10mm ammunition, 3,200 rounds of 7.62x39mm ammunition, and 50 rounds of 7.62x25mm ammunition. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Robles to 37 months of confinement, with credit for time served, three years of supervised release and a $100 special assessment.

 

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/export-violations-2022/1441-e2782/file

 

January 9, 2023: Behrouz Mokhtari, 72, of McLean, Virginia, and Tehran, Iran, a naturalized U.S. citizen, pleaded guilty to two separate conspiracies to violate sanctions imposed by the United States on Iran regarding the exportation, re-exportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, of any goods, technology, or services to Iran. According to his guilty plea, from at least March 2018 until at least September 2020, Mokhtari conspired with his co-defendant and others to evade Iranian sanctions by engaging in business activities on behalf of Iranian entities without first obtaining the required licenses from the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).

 

Mokhtari held management positions and/or maintained ownership control of multiple businesses in Iran and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), referred to collectively as “the FSR Network.” Mokhtari and his co-conspirators used the FSR Network to provide services to Iranian entities and engage in transactions involving Iranian petrochemical products, including refining petrochemical products and transporting them by sea. Mokhtari and his co-conspirators used bank accounts located in the UAE, including Bitubiz FZE, which was part of the FSR Network and over which Mokhtari exercised partial or complete control, to process these U.S. dollar transactions.

 

As part of his guilty plea, Mokhtari must forfeit money, property, and assets derived from, obtained as the result of, or used to facilitate the commission of his illegal activities, including the residence he purchased in Campbell, California, and money judgment in the amount of $2,862,598.12. Mokhtari faces a maximum sentence of five years in federal prison for each of the two conspiracy counts and is scheduled for sentencing on April 3.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/virginia-man-pleads-guilty-conspiring-violate-iranian-sanctions

 

January 11, 2023: Tao Jiang, the president and owner of Broad Tech System, Inc., a California-based electronics distribution company, admitted to a federal judge in Providence that he and his company participated in a conspiracy to conceal information from the U.S. Department of Commerce and U.S. Customs and Border Protection as part of a scheme to illegally export chemicals manufactured and/or distributed by a Rhode Island-based company to a technology company in China with ties to the Chinese military, announced United States Attorney Zachary A. Cunha.

 

Tao Jiang, aka Jason Jiang, 53, of Riverside, CA, and Broad Tech Systems, Inc., pleaded guilty as charged by way of indictment to conspiracy, violation of the Export Control Act, and money laundering conspiracy.

Jiang and Broad Tech System admitted that they conspired together and with Bohr Winn-Shih, an engineer employed at Broad Tech System, to order the chemicals Photoresist and HPRD (Developer) from a North Kingstown-based manufacturer, then knowingly submitted false and misleading documentation to the U.S. Government and to shipping companies in an effort to have those products illegally shipped to a company in China, in violation of the Export Control Reform Act.

 

https://www.justice.gov/usao-ri/pr/california-based-company-company-president-plead-guilty-scheme-violate-export-control-act

 

January 17, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 2605: The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has issued an Order denying the export privileges of Brett McGinnis until September 16, 2031. On September 16, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Brett McGinnis was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554. Specifically, McGinnis was convicted of knowingly and willfully exporting and smuggling from the United States to Mexico, a Beretta Model 84, .380 caliber pistol; a Beretta, Model 92FS, .22LR caliber pistol; 2,451 rounds of .22 caliber ammunition; 1,500 rounds of Fiocchi .38 Super Caliber Ammunition, 500 rounds of Magtech .44 Caliber Ammunition; 440 rounds of TulAmmo 7.62 caliber Ammunition; 300 Rounds of G2 Research .380 Caliber Ammunition; 200 Rounds of G2 Research 9mm Ammunition; 200 Rounds of Hornady .270 Caliber Ammunition; 150 Rounds of Remington .45 Caliber Colt Ammunition; 120 Rounds of Remington .308 Caliber Ammunition; and various other firearms, firearms parts, and ammunition. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced McGinnis to 24 months in prison, three years supervised release, $100 special assessment, and a $10,000 fine.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/01/17/2023-00711/in-the-matter-of-brett-mcginnis-54-north-st-andrews-drive-ormond-beach-fl-32174-order-denying-export

 

January 17, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 2604: The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has issued an Order denying the export privileges of Ge Song Tao until July 14, 2031. On July 14, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Ge Song Tao was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 371 and 18 U.S.C. 554(a). Specifically, Ge was convicted of conspiring to submit false export information through the federal government's Automated Export System and to export maritime raiding craft and engines to China fraudulently and attempting to export that equipment fraudulently. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Ge to 42 months of confinement, three years of supervised release, a $50,000 criminal fine, and $200 assessment.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/01/17/2023-00710/in-the-matter-of-ge-song-tao-ge-block-3-zijinyuan-no-5-muxuyuan-street-nanjing-210007-china-order

 

January 17, 2023: 88 Fed. Reg. 2603: The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has issued an Order denying the export privileges of Daniel Medina until February 22, 2026. On February 22, 2019, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Jose Daniel Medina was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554. Specifically, Medina was convicted of knowingly smuggling and attempting to smuggle from the United States to Mexico one (1) Barrett model 50 BMG and a .50 caliber rifle. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Medina to 37 months in prison, with credit time served, three years supervised release, and a $100 special assessment.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/01/17/2023-00709/in-the-matter-of-jose-daniel-medina-calle-los-piros-72-colonia-luis-donaldo-colosio-nogales-sonora

 

 

January 17, 2023: Jonathan Yet Wing Soong pleaded guilty to violating export control laws in connection with a scheme to secretly funnel sensitive aeronautics software to a Beijing university. Between August 2016 and September 2020, Soong, 35, of Castro Valley, Calif., was employed as a program administrator by Universities Space Research Association (USRA), a nonprofit research corporation focusing on advancing space science and technology. In April of 2016, USRA contracted with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to, among other things, license and distribute aeronautics-related Army flight control software for a fee. Soong’s duties included, among other things, conducting and servicing software license sales, conducting export compliance screening of customers, generating software licenses, and exporting software pursuant to purchased licenses. As part of his duties, Soong was responsible for vetting customers to ensure they did not appear on certain restrictive lists—including the Department of Commerce’s Entity List and other U.S. government lists—that placed limitations on the transfer of products to identified entities. In pleading guilty, Soong admitted that he willingly exported and facilitated the sale and transfer of restricted software to Beihang University, knowing that the university was on the Department of Commerce’s Entity List. According to government filings in the case, Beihang University was added to the Entity List due to the University’s involvement in the People’s Republic of China military rocket systems and unmanned air vehicle systems. In his plea agreement, Soong acknowledged he used an intermediary to complete the export of the program to avoid detection that the real purchaser was on the Entity List. Soong remains out of custody pending sentencing.

 

https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndca/pr/castro-valley-resident-pleads-guilty-illegally-exporting-american-aviation-technology

 

January 18, 2023: The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has issued an Order denying the export privileges of Eli Isael Rodriguez-Jasso until October 28, 2026. On October 28, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Eli Isael Rodriguez-Jasso (“Rodriguez-Jasso”) was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 554(a). Specifically, Rodriguez-Jasso was convicted of knowingly and unlawfully exporting or attempting to export from the United States to Mexico ammunition and two firearms magazines in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 554. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Rodriguez-Jasso to 46 months in prison, with credit for time served, three years supervised release and a $100 assessment.

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/export-violations-2023/1443-e2787/file

 

January 18, 2023: The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has issued an Order denying the export privileges of Jermaine Craig Rhoomes until February 5, 2030. On February 5, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jermaine Craig Rhoomes (“Rhoomes”) was convicted of violating Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. § 2778) (“AECA”). Specifically, Rhoomes was convicted of knowingly and willfully exporting and causing to be exported from the U.S. to Jamaica two (2) 7.62-caliber AK47-style rifles; five (5) 5.56-caliber AR15-style rifles; four (4) 9mm-caliber pistols; two (2) .40-caliber pistols; two (2) .45-caliber pistols; 3,315 rounds of ammunition; and 38 firearm magazines, all of which were designated as defense articles on the United States Munitions List at the time of export, without first obtaining the required license or written authorization from the Department of State.

 

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/export-violations-2023/1442-e2786/file

 

January 20, 2023: Two businessmen, Vladislav Osipov, 51, a Russian national, and Richard Masters, 52, a United Kingdom national, are charged in separate indictments in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, with facilitating a sanctions evasion and money laundering scheme in relation to the ownership and operation of the Motor Yacht (M/Y) Tango (International Maritime Organization number 1010703), a $90 million, a 255-foot luxury yacht owned by sanctioned Russian oligarch Viktor Vekselberg. The defendants are charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States and to commit offenses against the United States, violating the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and money laundering. The United States requested that the Kingdom of Spain provisionally arrest Masters for purposes of extradition. The arrest was executed by the Spanish Guardia Civil. An arrest warrant against Osipov is outstanding.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/arrest-and-criminal-charges-announced-against-british-and-russian-businessmen-facilitating

 

 

January 23, 2023: A former Special Agent in Charge of the FBI New York Counterintelligence Division and a former Soviet and Russian diplomat were arrested Saturday on criminal charges related to their alleged violating and conspiring to violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and conspiring to commit money laundering and money laundering.

 

According to court documents, Charles F. McGonigal, 54, of New York City, and Sergey Shestakov, 69, of Morris, Connecticut, are charged in a five-count indictment in the Southern District of New York with violating and conspiring to violate the IEEPA, and with conspiring to commit money laundering and money laundering.

 

According to court documents, on April 6, 2018, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated Oleg Deripaska as a Specially Designated National (SDN) in connection with its finding that the actions of the Government of the Russian Federation with respect to Ukraine constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to U.S. national security and foreign policy. According to the U.S. Treasury, Deripaska was sanctioned for having acted or purported to act on behalf of, directly or indirectly, a senior official of the Government of the Russian Federation and for operating in the energy sector of the Russian Federation economy.

 

McGonigal is a former Special Agent in Charge (SAC) of the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division in New York who retired in 2018. While working at the FBI, McGonigal supervised and participated in investigations of Russian oligarchs, including Deripaska. Sergey Shestakov is a former Soviet and Russian diplomat who later became a U.S. citizen and a Russian interpreter for courts and government offices.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-special-agent-charge-fbi-new-york-counterintelligence-division-charged-violating-us

 

 

January 26, 2023: The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has renewed the Temporary Denial Order denying the export privileges of Empresa de Transporte Aéreocargo del Sur, S.A., a/k/a Aerocargo del Sur Transportation Company, a/k/a EMTRASUR, located at Avenida Intercomunal, Edificio Sede, Sector 6.3, Maiquetia, Distrito Federal, Venezuela, and Avenida Lecuna Torre Oeste Piso 49, Libertador, Caracas, Venezuela, for an additional 180 days. As noted in OEE’s initial request for a temporary denial order, EMTRASUR is a subsidiary of Consorcio Venezolano de Industrias Aeronauticas Y Servicios Aereos, S.A., a/k/a CONVIASA (“CONVIASA”), a Venezuelan state-owned airline.

 

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/export-violations-2023/1447-e2788/file

JANUARY 2023 EXPORT CONTROL REGULATION UPDATES Read More »

NOVEMBER 2022 EXPORT CONTROLS AND COMPLIANCE UPDATE

LATEST EXPORT CONTROLS AND COMPLIANCE UPDATE

This newsletter is a listing of the latest changes in export control regulations through November 30, 2022.  The newsletter is provided as a complimentary service to assist exporters with their ITAR and EAR export compliance responsibilities. It provides a summary of recent changes to export control regulations or other regulatory matters of interest that may impact your company’s international trade and export compliance functions. Call us at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net with questions or comments.

 

See also our “Latest Sanctions Fines & Penalties” section below for an update on companies and persons denied export privileges by the United States Government.

 

REGULATORY UPDATES

 

The President

 

President Biden Provided Advance Notification To The U.S. Congress Of His Intent To Terminate The Designation Of Burkina Faso As A Beneficiary Sub-Saharan African Country

 

November 1, 2022: In accordance with section 506A(a)(3)(B) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2466a(a)(3)(B)), President Joseph Biden provided advance notification to the U.S. Congress of his intent to terminate the designation of Burkina Faso as a beneficiary sub-Saharan African country under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA).

 

President Biden took this step because he determined that the Government of Burkina Faso has not established, or is not making continual progress toward establishing, the protection of the rule of law and of political pluralism, as stated in the eligibility requirements of section 104 of the AGOA.

 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2022/11/02/letter-to-the-speaker-of-the-house-of-representatives-and-the-president-of-the-senate-on-the-presidents-intent-to-terminate-the-designation-of-burkina-faso-as-a-beneficiary-sub-saharan-africa/

 

*******

 

President Biden Continues National Emergency In Sudan

 

November 3, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 66225: President Biden continued the national emergency in Sudan, declared in Executive Order 13067, as expanded by Executive Order 13400, and continue in effect beyond November 3, 2022. The situation in Darfur continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/11/02/2022-24046/continuation-of-the-national-emergency-with-respect-to-sudan

 

*******

 

President Biden Continues National Emergency With Respect To The Threat From Securities Investments That Finance Certain Companies Of The People’s Republic Of China

 

November 10, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 68017: The national emergency declared in Executive Order 13959 of November 12, 2020, expanded in scope by Executive Order 14032 of June 3, 2021, must continue in effect beyond November 12, 2022 to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States constituted by the threat from securities investments that finance certain companies of the People's Republic of China (PRC). Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), President Biden continued for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13959 with respect to the threat from securities investments that finance certain companies of the PRC and expanded in Executive Order 14032.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/11/10/2022-24787/continuation-of-the-national-emergency-with-respect-to-the-threat-from-securities-investments-that

 

*******

 

President Biden Continues National Emergency In Iran

 

November 10, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 68013: President Biden has continued for 1 year the national emergency with respect to Iran declared in Executive Order 12170 of November 14, 1979, and the measures adopted on that date to deal with that emergency. The emergency declared by Executive Order 12170 is distinct from the emergency declared in Executive Order 12957 on March 15, 1995.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/11/10/2022-24779/continuation-of-the-national-emergency-with-respect-to-iran

 

*******

 

President Biden Continues National Emergency Regarding The Proliferation Of Nuclear, Biological, And Chemical Weapons

 

November 10, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 68015: President Biden has continued for 1 year the national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States posed by the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons (weapons of mass destruction) and the means of delivering such weapons.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/11/10/2022-24784/continuation-of-the-national-emergency-with-respect-to-the-proliferation-of-weapons-of-mass

 

*******

 

President Biden Continues National Emergency In Nicaragua

 

November 15, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 68589: President Biden has continued for one year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13851 of November 27, 2018, in response to the situation in Nicaragua posing an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. The EO was augmented by the additional measures declared in Executive Order 14088 of October 24, 2022.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/11/15/2022-25006/continuation-of-the-national-emergency-with-respect-to-the-situation-in-nicaragua

 

*******

 

U.S. Department Of Commerce, Bureau Of Industry and Security

 

The U.S. Department Of Commerce, Bureau Of Industry And Security Requests Comments On BIS Licensing Responsibilities And Enforcement

 

November 10, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 67867: The U.S. Department Of Commerce, Bureau Of Industry and Security requests comments on BIS licensing responsibilities and enforcement. To ensure consideration, comments regarding this proposed information collection must be received on or before January 9, 2023.

This collection of information involves ten miscellaneous activities described in Sections 744.15(b), Part 744 Supplement No. 7, paragraph (d), § 748.4, and Part 758 of the EAR that are associated with the export of items controlled by the Department of Commerce. Most of these activities do not involve the submission of documents to the BIS but instead involve the exchange of documents among parties in the export transaction to ensure that each party understands its obligations under U.S. law. Others involve writing certain export control statements on shipping documents or reporting unforeseen changes in shipping and disposition of exported commodities. These activities are needed by the Office of Export Enforcement and the U.S. Customs Service (Customs) to document export transactions, enforce the EAR and protect the National Security of the United States.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/11/10/2022-24608/agency-information-collection-activities-submission-to-the-office-of-management-and-budget-omb-for

 

*******

 

 

U.S. Department Of Commerce, Bureau Of Industry and Security Updates Pakistan Due Diligence Guidance

 

November 17, 2022: The U.S. Department Of Commerce, Bureau Of Industry and Security updated its Pakistan due diligence guidance. Pakistan has a nuclear program and a missile program that are subject to end-use and end-user restrictions pursuant to Part 744 of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) (15 C.F.R. Parts 730-774).

 

Accordingly, BIS’ guidance highlights:

  1. The supplemental licensing requirements applicable to exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) of items subject to the EAR that may be destined to nuclear or missile activities;
  2. Restrictions on specific activities of U.S. persons; and

III. Best practices for screening customers in Pakistan to prevent the diversion of items subject to the EAR to unauthorized end uses and end users.

 

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/policy-guidance/pakistan-due-diligence-guidance

 

*******

 

U.S. Department Of Commerce, Bureau Of Industry and Security Requests Comments on Entity List and Unverified List Requests

 

November 25, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 72446: The U.S. Department Of Commerce, Bureau Of Industry and Security requests comments on Entity List and Unverified List Requests. To ensure consideration, comments regarding this proposed information collection must be received on or before January 24, 2023. This collection is needed to provide a procedure for persons or organizations listed on the Entity List and Unverified List to request removal or modification of the entry that affects them.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/11/25/2022-25700/agency-information-collection-activities-submission-to-the-office-of-management-and-budget-omb-for?utm_campaign=subscription+mailing+list&utm_source=federalregister.gov&utm_medium=email

 

*******

 

Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC)

 

DDTC Name And Address Changes Posted To Website

 

November 2 through 22, 2022: The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) posted the following name and/or address changes on its website at    

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_kb_article_page&sys_id=bd72ca0adbf8d30044f9ff621f961981:

  • Change in Name for the Government of the United Kingdom from “Her Majesty the Queen” to “His Majesty the King”;
  • Change in Name and Ownership from II-VI Incorporated to Coherent Corp. due to acquisition;
  • Change in Name and Ownership from Newman & Spurr Consultancy Limited to QinetiQ Training and Simulation Limited due to acquisition;
  • Change in Name and Ownership from SETTAS sa to CASTINGPAR sa due to acquisition;
  • Change in Name from L3 Technologies MAS Inc. to L3Harris MAS Inc. due to corporate rebranding;
  • Change in Name from L3 MAPPS Inc. to L3Harris Mapps Inc. due to corporate rebranding;
  • Change in Name and Ownership from Altran Innovación, S.L. to Capgemini España S.L. due to acquisition;
  • Change in Name and Ownership from Altran Sverige AB to Capgemini Engineering Sverige AB due to acquisition;
  • Change in Name from Vectrus, Inc. to V2X, Inc. due to merger;
  • Change in Name and Ownership from MD Helicopters, Inc. to MD Helicopters, LLC due to acquisition;
  • Due to corporate rebranding Babcock Italy entities will change names as follows:

From Elilario Italia S.p.A. to Babcock Mission Critical Services Italia S.p.A;

From Aeroveneta Societa Di Servizi Aerei SRL to Babcock Mission Critical Services Italia S.p.A.;

From Elidolomiti S.r.l. to Babcock Mission Critical Services Italia S.p.A.;

From Helicapital Inversiones Aereas S.L. to Babcock Mission Critical Services Italia S.p.A.;

From Helitalia S.p.A. to Babcock Mission Critical Services Italia S.p.A.;

From Inaer Helicopter Italia S.p.A. to Babcock Mission Critical Services Italia S.p.A.;

From Societa Aerofotogrammetrica Nazionale SRL to Babcock Mission Critical Services Italia S.p.A.;

From Inaer Helicopter S.p.A. to Babcock Mission Critical Services Italia S.p.A.;

From TASS s.r.l. to Babcock Mission Critical Services Italia S.p.A.;

From Inaer Aviation Italia Fleet S.p.A. Babcock Mission Critical Services Fleet Management S.p.A.;

  • Due to corporate rebranding Babcock Portugal entities will change names as follows:

From Inaer Helicopter Portugal LDA to Babcock Mission Critical Services Portugal Unipessoal LDA;

From Helisul – Sociedade de Meios Aéreos LDA to Babcock Mission Critical Services Portugal Unipessoal LDA; and

  • Change in Name from Ultra Electronics Limited to Ultra PMES Limited and Ultra Cyber Limited due to internal restructuring.

 

*******

 

The Department Of State Temporarily Suspends 22 CFR § 120.11(c), “The See-Through Rule” For Capacitors In USML Category XI(c)(5)

 

November 21, 2022: The Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Defense Trade Controls temporarily suspended for a period of six (6) months the applicability of § 120.11(c) of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) for certain capacitors described in U.S. Munitions List (USML) Category XI(c)(5). The DOS assessed that it is in the security and foreign policy interests of the United States to facilitate commercial uses of certain capacitors when integrated into any item not described on the USML (for example, certain items used in energy exploration and commercial aviation). Accordingly, pursuant to ITAR § 126.2, and the DOS’s administration of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA), the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Defense Trade Controls ordered the temporary suspension of ITAR § 120.11(c) with respect to capacitors described in USML Category XI(c)(5) that have a voltage rating of one hundred twenty-five volts (125 V) or less and have been integrated into, and included as an integral part of, any item not described on the USML. Such articles are licensed by the Department of Commerce when integrated into, and included as an integral part of, items subject to the EAR.  This temporary suspension is valid for a period of six months, from November 21, 2022 to May 21, 2022, or when terminated by notice, whichever occurs first.  Capacitors described in USML Category XI(c)(5) remain subject to the controls of the ITAR in all other circumstances, including as stand-alone articles. The export, reexport, retransfer, or temporary import of technical data and defense services directly related to all defense articles described in USML Category XI(c)(5) remain subject to the ITAR.  Any violation of the ITAR, including any violation of the terms and conditions of any export license issued by the Department of State prior to the temporary suspension announced herein, remains a violation of the AECA. The Department of State strongly encourages industry to disclose unauthorized exports, reexports, retransfers, or temporary imports of defense articles, including the subject capacitors, that occurred before this temporary suspension.

 

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_public_portal_news_and_events&cat=Notice

 

*******

 

Suspended For 1 Year, the Republic of Cyprus Designation As An ITAR 126.1 Country

 

November 22, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 71250: On September 16, 2022, DDTC announced Secretary Blinken’s determination and certification to Congress that the Republic of Cyprus has met the necessary conditions under the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for the Fiscal Year 2020 (P.L. 116-92) and the Eastern Mediterranean Security and Energy Partnership Act of 2019 (Div. J. P.L. 116-94) to allow the Department to approve exports, reexports, and transfers of defense articles to the Republic of Cyprus for Fiscal Year 2023.

 

In conjunction with Secretary Blinken’s decision, the Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security suspended the policy of denial for retransfers and temporary imports destined for or originating in the Republic of Cyprus and brokering activities involving the Republic of Cyprus for Fiscal Year 2023.

Accordingly, the Department has published a Federal Register notice amending § 126.1(r) of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) to specify that the Republic of Cyprus’ status as a proscribed destination is suspended from October 1, 2022, through September 30, 2023.  As a result of this change, certain exemptions to licensing requirements are now available for exports, reexports, retransfers, and temporary imports destined for or originating in the Republic of Cyprus and brokering activities involving the Republic of Cyprus, provided the conditions for the use of those exemptions are met.

 

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_public_portal_news_and_events&cat=Notice and https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/11/22/2022-25541/international-traffic-in-arms-regulations-prohibited-exports-imports-and-sales-to-or-from-certain

 

*******

 

The U.S. Department of State's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) Seeks Public Comment

 

November 30, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 73577: The U.S. Department of State's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) is seeking public comment by December 30, 2022, on Commodity Jurisdiction Determinations.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/11/30/2022-26103/30-day-notice-of-proposed-information-collection-request-for-commodity-jurisdiction-determination

 

*******

 

The U.S. Department of State's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) Seeks Public Comment

 

November 30, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 73577: The U.S. Department of State's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) is seeking public comment by December 30, 2022, on technology security/clearance plans, screening records, and non-disclosure agreements.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/11/30/2022-26102/30-day-notice-of-proposed-information-collection-technology-securityclearance-plans-screening

 

*******

 

November 30, 2022: The U.S. Department of State’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) has updated the ITAR Redline version made available as a supporting document to 87 FR 16396, Mar. 23, 2022. This Revision 2, dated Nov. 28, 2022, adopts changes made by 87 FR 71250, Nov.  22, 2022, and limits redlines to only those changes made by the March 23 reorganization rule (i.e., changes to plain text those corrections to the original document made by Revision 1 to the ITAR Redline, dated Sept. 16, 2022).

In addition to making Revision 2 available, DDTC has updated the link to the ITAR Redline in the original announcement entitled “International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Consolidation and Restructuring of Purposes and Definitions,” dated March 22, 2022.

 

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/sys_attachment.do?sysparm_referring_url=tear_off&view=true&sys_id=e3ad8a6c1befddd0d1f1ea02f54bcbde

 

*******

 

U.S. Department Of Defense

 

DOD Releases Zero Trust Strategy And Roadmap

 

November 7, 2022: The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has released the DoD Zero Trust Strategy and Roadmap. Current and future cyber threats and attacks drive the need for a Zero Trust approach that goes beyond the traditional perimeter defense approach. The Department intends to implement distinct Zero Trust capabilities and activities as outlined in the strategy and associated Roadmap by FY27. The strategy envisions a DoD Information Enterprise secured by a fully implemented, Department-wide Zero Trust cybersecurity framework that will reduce the attack surface, enable risk management and effective data-sharing in partnership environments, and quickly contain and remediate adversary activities. The strategy outlines four high-level and integrated strategic goals that define what the Department will do to achieve its vision for ZT:

  • Zero Trust Cultural Adoption – All DoD personnel are aware, understand, trained, and committed to a Zero Trust mindset and culture and support integration of ZT.
  • DoD information Systems Secured and Defended – Cybersecurity practices incorporate and operationalize Zero Trust in new and legacy systems.
  • Technology Acceleration – Technologies deploy at a pace equal to or exceeding industry advancements.
  • Zero Trust Enablement – Department- and Component-level processes, policies, and funding are synchronized with Zero Trust principles and approaches.

 

Implementing Zero Trust will be a continuous process in the face of evolving adversary threats and new technologies. Additional Zero Trust enhancements will be incorporated in subsequent years as technology changes and U.S. adversaries evolve.

 

https://dodcio.defense.gov/Portals/0/Documents/Library/DoD-ZTStrategy.pdf

 

*******

 

DSCA Notification to Congress of  Foreign Military Sale To The Government Of Belgium Of AIM-120C-8 Advanced Medium Range Air-To-Air Missiles

 

November 8, 2022: The Department of State has made a determination approving a possible Foreign Military Sale to the Government of Belgium of AIM-120C-8 Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM) and related equipment for a total estimated cost of $380 million. The Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) delivered the required certification notifying Congress of this possible sale on November 8, 2022.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/press-media/major-arms-sales/belgium-advanced-medium-range-air-air-missiles-f-16-and-f-35-programs

 

*******

 

DSCA Notification to Congress of  Foreign Military Sale To The Government Of Lithuania Of M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System

 

November 9, 2022: The State Department has made a determination approving a possible Foreign Military Sale to the Government of Lithuania of M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) Launchers and related equipment for an estimated cost of $495 million. The Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) delivered the required certification notifying Congress of this possible sale.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/press-media/major-arms-sales/lithuania-m142-high-mobility-artillery-rocket-system-himars

 

*******

 

DSCA Notification to Congress of Foreign Military Sale To The Government Of Oman Of Joint Stand Off Weapons

 

November 9, 2022: The State Department has made a determination approving a possible Foreign Military Sale to the Government of Oman of Joint Stand Off Weapons (JSOW) and related equipment for an estimated cost of $385 million. The Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) delivered the required certification notifying Congress of this possible sale.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/press-media/major-arms-sales/oman-joint-stand-weapons-jsow

 

DSCA Notification to Congress of Foreign Military Sale To The Government Of Qatar Of The Fixed Site-Low, Slow, Small Unmanned Aircraft System Integrated Defeat System

 

November 29, 2022: The State Department has made a determination approving a possible Foreign Military Sale to the Government of Qatar of the Fixed Site-Low, Slow, Small Unmanned Aircraft System Integrated Defeat System (FS-LIDS) System of Systems and related equipment for an estimated cost of $1 billion. The Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) delivered the required certification notifying Congress of this possible sale.

 

https://www.dsca.mil/sites/default/files/mas/Press%20Release%20-%20Qatar%2022-36%20CN.pdf

 

*******

 

Department of the Treasury

 

Treasury Announced Availability Of CFIUS Enforcement And Penalty Guidelines

 

November 2, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 66220: The Office of Investment Security, Department of the Treasury, announced the availability of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) Enforcement and Penalty Guidelines. These guidelines provide the public with a summary of CFIUS's practice regarding penalties and other remedies for violations of section 721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 as amended (Section 721), the regulations promulgated thereunder, or mitigation agreements, conditions, or orders pursuant thereto (Violations).

 

CFIUS may impose civil penalties for the following:

 

 

  • Failure to File.  Failure to timely submit a mandatory declaration or notice, as applicable.
  • Non-Compliance with CFIUS Mitigation.  Conduct that is prohibited by or otherwise fails to comply with CFIUS mitigation agreements, conditions, or orders (“CFIUS Mitigation”).
  • Material Misstatement, Omission, or False Certification.  Material misstatements in or omissions from information filed with CFIUS and false or materially incomplete certifications filed in connection with assessments, reviews, investigations, or CFIUS Mitigation, including information provided during informal consultations or in response to requests for information.

 

The text of the CFIUS Enforcement Guidelines is available in its entirety on the CFIUS section of the Treasury Department's website at https://home.treasury.gov/​policy-issues/​international/​the-committee-on-foreign-investment-in-the-united-states-cfius/​cfius-enforcement-and-penalty-guidelines.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/11/02/2022-23803/notice-of-availability-of-committee-on-foreign-investment-in-the-united-states-enforcement-and

 

*******

 

Census Bureau

 

Census Deletes Port Of Export Codes

 

November 2, 2022: The U.S. Census Bureau deleted the following Port of Export Codes for Automated Export System (AES) / Electronic Export Information (EEI) filing:

  • 2781 Palm Springs User Fee, LAX, CA;
  • 2782 San Bernardino International Airport; and
  • 3707 Sheboygan, WI.

 

*******

 

U.S. Census Bureau Tips on How to Resolve AES Response Messages

 

November 22­, 2022: When a shipment is filed to the AES, a system response message is generated and indicates whether the shipment has been accepted or rejected.  If the shipment is accepted, the AES filer receives an Internal Transaction Number (ITN) as confirmation.  Though the shipment is accepted, the filer may still receive a Verify Message, Compliance Alert, Informational Message or Warning Message along with their ITN.  However, if the shipment is rejected, a Fatal Error notification is received and must be corrected to receive a valid ITN.

 

To help take the appropriate action for the different AES Response Messages, here are some tips on how to address the most frequent messages that were generated in AES for this month.

 

Response Code:  600

Narrative:     Vehicle ID Qualifier Must be V or P

Severity:       Fatal

Reason:        The Vehicle ID Qualifier was not reported.

Resolution:  The Vehicle ID Qualifier identifies the type of used vehicle number reported on the shipment.  The Vehicle ID Qualifier must be either V for Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) or P for Product Identification Number (PIN).

Verify the Vehicle ID Qualifier, correct the shipment and resubmit.

 

Response Code: 856

Narrative:      Improbable ISO

Severity:        Verify

Reason:         The ISO Country Code reported may not be valid for the Country of Destination.

Resolution:    Valid ISO Country Codes reportable in AES are contained in Appendix C – ISO Country Codes.

Verify the ISO Country Code, correct the shipment and resubmit.

 

https://www.cbp.gov/document/guidance/aestir-appendix-commodity-filing-response-messages?utm_campaign=&utm_content=&utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery

 

*******

 

Federal Communications Commission

 

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Bans The Import Of Communications Equipment From Huawei Technologies, ZTE Corporation, Hytera Communications, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology, and Dahua Technology (and their subsidiaries and affiliates).

 

November 25, 2022: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted new rules prohibiting communications equipment deemed to pose an unacceptable risk to national security from being authorized for importation or sale in the United States. This is the latest step by the Commission to protect our nation’s communications networks. In recent years, the Commission, Congress, and the Executive Branch have taken multiple actions to build a more secure and resilient supply chain for communications equipment and services within the United States.

 

The Report and Order apply to future authorizations of equipment identified on the Covered List published by the FCC’s Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau pursuant to the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019. The new rules prohibit the authorization of equipment through the FCC’s Certification process and make clear that such equipment cannot be authorized under the Supplier’s Declaration of Conformity process or be imported or marketed under rules that allow exemption from an equipment authorization. The Covered List (which lists both equipment and services) currently includes communications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies, ZTE Corporation, Hytera Communications, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology, and Dahua Technology (and their subsidiaries and affiliates). The new rules implement the directive in the Secure Equipment Act of 2021, signed into law by President Biden last November that requires the Commission to adopt such rules.

 

file:///C:/Users/jherzo/Downloads/DOC-389524A1.pdf and file:///C:/Users/jherzo/Downloads/FCC-22-84A1.pdf

 

*******

 

U.S. Customs & Border Protection

 

U.S. Customs & Border Protection Launched Updates To The ACE Automated Systems Homepage

 

November 2, 2022: U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) launched of updates to the ACE and Automated Systems homepage. While users will continue to have access to all the latest information about the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE), the updated website will offer a streamlined organization of ACE resources and fewer clicks for users to access the information they need. In particular, the coming update will include a new “How to Use ACE” page, providing an overview of the ACE Portal and ACE electronic data interchange (EDI) processing and giving users a single location to access all related resources. Any links or bookmarks to URLs that are no longer in service will be redirected to the upgraded resource page.

 

https://content.govdelivery.com/bulletins/gd/USDHSCBP-33596f5?wgt_ref=USDHSCBP_WIDGET_2

 

LATEST SANCTIONS FINES & PENALTIES

 

This section of our newsletter provides information on the latest sanctions, fines and penalties for export violations or matters of non-compliance with the ITAR or EAR issued by the US government enforcement agencies. It is provided as a service to exporters and associates of FD Associates to remind them of the importance of extreme due diligence in all international trade and export compliance matters, particularly those involving exports subject to the ITAR or the EAR. Don't let this happen to you or your company! Call us with questions or concerns at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net.

 

Sanctions

 

 

Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

 

November 8, 2022: The U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) extended the temporary denial order against Mahan Airways, Pejman Mahmood Kosarayanifard, Mahmoud Amini, Kerman Aviation, Sirjanco Trading LLC, Mahan Air General Trading LLC, Mehdi Bahrami, Al Naser Airlines, Ali Abdullah Alhay, Bahar Safwa General Trading, Sky Blue Bird Group, and Issarn Shammout for 180 days.

 

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/export-violations-2022/1421-e2763/file

 

*******

 

November 21, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 70780: The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued an Order Renewing the Temporary Denial of Export (TDO) privileges of Rossiya Airlines of Russia based on BIS' evidence and related investigation indicated that after the issuance of the TDO, Rossiya continued to fly aircraft into Russia in violation of the EAR including flights from Antalya and Istanbul, Turkey. Rossiya has continued to operate aircraft subject to the EAR, which was flown into Russia on or after March 2, 2022, on flights within Russia, including, but not limited to, between such cities as Anadyr, Russia; Kaliningrad, Russia; Khaborovsk, Russia; Magadan, Russia; and Moscow, Russia, in violation of Section 736.2(b)(10) of the EAR.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/11/21/2022-25265/rossiya-airlines-pilotov-st-18-4-st-petersburg-russia-196210

 

*******

 

Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

 

November 3, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated members of an international oil smuggling network that facilitated oil trades and generated revenue for Hizballah and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force (IRGC-QF). The network being designated includes several key individuals and numerous front companies and vessels involved in blending oil to conceal the Iranian origins of the shipments and exporting it around the world in support of Hizballah and the IRGC-QF.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Artemov, Viktor Sergiyovich of the Ukraine;
  • El Zein, Mohamed of Iran;
  • Fazzone, Gregorio of Switzerland;
  • Nafrieh, Edman of Iran;
  • Ryabikova, Tatiana of France; and
  • Zahedi, Rouzbeh of Iran.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Al Hakeel Al Aswad Oil Trading LLC of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Ava Petroleum Services S.A. of Switzerland;
  • Azul Vista Shipping Corporation of the Marshall Islands;
  • Blue Berri Shipping Inc. of the Marshall Islands;
  • Centrum Maritime PTE. LTD. of Singapore;
  • Energotrade Plus Dmcc of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Expanse Ship Management Limited of Turkey;
  • Gilda Tar Karvan International Company of Iran;
  • Harbour Ship Management Limited of the Marshall Islands;
  • Intrepid Navigators S.A., of the Marshall Islands;
  • Monumont Ship Management Limited of the Marshall Islands;
  • Petro Naviero PTE. LTD. of Singapore;
  • Pontus Navigation Corp. of the Marshall Islands;
  • Rising Tide Shipping Corp. of the Marshall Islands;
  • Technology Bright International Limited of the Marshall Islands;
  • Triton Navigation Corp. of the Marshall Islands; and
  • Vista Clara Shipping Corporation of the Marshall Islands.

 

The following vessels have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Adisa Oil Products Tanker Panama flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9304667;
  • B Luminosa Oil Products Tanker Djibouti flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9256016;
  • Bluefins Oil Products Tanker Djibouti flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9221657;
  • Boceanica Oil Products Tanker Djibouti flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9267132;
  • Bueno Oil Products Tanker Djibouti flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9282443;
  • Julia A (f.k.a. AZUL) Oil Products Tanker Liberia flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9236353;
  • Lara I (f.k.a. CLARA) Oil Products Tanker Liberia flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9231767;
  • Nolan (f.k.a. OSLO) Oil Products Tanker Panama flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9179701;
  • Rain Drop Crude Oil Tanker Cook Islands flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9233208;
  • Young Yong Oil Products Tanker Djibouti flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9194127; and
  • Zephyr I (f.k.a. ZHEN I) Crude Oil Tanker Panama flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9255880.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1076 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221103

 

*******

 

November 4, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), along with the Government of Canada, designated Haitian nationals Joseph Lambert (Lambert) and Youri Latortue (Latortue) pursuant to Executive Order 14059 of December 15, 2021, “Imposing Sanctions on Foreign Persons Involved in the Global Illicit Drug Trade.” OFAC designated Lambert and Latortue for having engaged in, or attempted to engage in, activities or transactions that have materially contributed to, or pose a significant risk of materially contributing to, the international proliferation of illicit drugs or their means of production. Lambert is the sitting President of the Haitian Senate and has held political positions in Haiti for 20 years. Latortue is a former Haitian Senator and a longtime politician.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Lambert, Joseph of Haiti; and
  • Latortue, Youri of Haiti.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1080 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221104

 

*******

 

November 7, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated four members of an Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) cell operating in South Africa who have provided technical, financial, or material support to the terrorist group. Treasury also designated eight companies owned, controlled, or directed by the individuals in this ISIS cell. ISIS continues to expand its terrorist network across the continent, as evidenced by the July 2022 United Nations Security Council report that highlighted the emerging importance of the country for funds transfers from ISIS leadership to ISIS affiliates across Africa. Treasury remains committed to exposing and disrupting terrorist financing on the African continent.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Akbar, Mohamad of South Africa;
  • Akbar, Nufael of South Africa;
  • Akbar, Umar of South Africa; and
  • Akbar, Yunus Mohamad of South Africa.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Ashiq Jewellers CC of South Africa;
  • Bailey Holdings PTY LTD of South Africa;
  • Flexoseal Waterproofing Solutions PTY LTD of South Africa;
  • HJ Bannister Construction CC of South Africa;
  • Ineos Trading PTY LTD of South Africa;
  • Ma Gold Traders PTY LTD of South Africa;
  • Shaahista Shoes CC of South Africa; and
  • Sultan's Construction CC of South Africa.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1084 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221107

 

*******

 

November 8, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is designating two individuals for engaging in transportation and procurement activities on behalf of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK). These individuals have acted on behalf of Air Koryo, an entity previously designated by OFAC for operating in the transportation industry in the DPRK economy. OFAC also delisted and simultaneously redesignated Tornado Cash under Executive Order (E.O.) 13722 and E.O. 13694, as amended. The redesignation takes into account additional information and also includes an additional basis for the designation of Tornado Cash regarding its support for DPRK activities. Tornado Cash, an entity that provides virtual currency mixing services, obfuscated the movement of over $455 million stolen in March 2022 by the OFAC-designated, DPRK-controlled Lazarus Group in the largest known virtual currency heist to date. OFAC also issued a new Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) to provide additional compliance guidance regarding the nature of the Tornado Cash entity, and updated three existing FAQs with additional guidance.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Oo, Kyaw Min, Yangon of Burma;
  • Ri, Sok, Dandong of China and North Korea; and
  • Yan, Zhiyong of China.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Sky Aviator Company Limited of Burma; and
  • Tornado Cash (See link below for Digital Currency Addresses associated with Tornado Cash.

 

Additional Frequently Asked Questions:

 

Question 1095: Who is the Tornado Cash “person” that OFAC designated pursuant to E.O. 13722 (“Blocking Property of the Government of North Korea and the Workers’ Party of Korea, and Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to North Korea”) and Executive Order (E.O.) 13694 (“Blocking the Property of Certain Persons Engaging in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities”), as amended?

 

Answer: A “person” subject to designation under E.O. 13722 or E.O. 13694, as amended, includes an individual or an entity defined as “a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization.”  Once OFAC has determined that a person is subject to sanctions, OFAC adds that person to the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List.

OFAC designated the entity known as Tornado Cash, which is a “partnership, association, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization” that may be designated pursuant to IEEPA.  Tornado Cash’s organizational structure consists of: (1) its founders and other associated developers, who together launched the Tornado Cash mixing service, developed new Tornado Cash mixing service features, created the Tornado Cash Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO), and actively promoted the platform’s popularity in an attempt to increase its user base; and (2) the Tornado Cash DAO, which is responsible for voting on and implementing new features created by the developers.  Tornado Cash uses computer code known as “smart contracts” to implement its governance structure, provide mixing services, offer financial incentives for users, increase its user base, and facilitate the financial gain of its users and developers.  OFAC has not designated Tornado Cash’s individual founders, developers, members of the DAO, or users, or other persons involved in supporting Tornado Cash at this time.  However, all Tornado Cash property and interests in property are blocked, and U.S. persons cannot transact with Tornado Cash or deal in its property and interests in property absent authorization from OFAC.  See FAQs 1077 and 1078.

 

Amended Frequently Asked Questions:

 

Question 1076: What is prohibited as a result of OFAC’s designation of Tornado Cash?

 

Answer: On August 8, 2022, OFAC designated the entity Tornado Cash pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13694, as amended, for facilitating the laundering of proceeds of cybercrimes, including those committed by the Lazarus Group, a North Korea state-sponsored hacking group that was sanctioned in 2019.  On November 8, 2022, OFAC simultaneously designated Tornado Cash pursuant to E.O. 13722 for having materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of the Government of North Korea and redesignated Tornado Cash pursuant to E.O. 13694, as amended, for facilitating the laundering of proceeds of cybercrimes, including those committed by the Lazarus Group, and as such the August 8, 2022 designation of Tornado Cash is no longer operative and is wholly replaced. As described in FAQs 561 and 562, OFAC may include identifiers on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) specific virtual currency wallet addresses associated with blocked persons.  As part of the SDN List entry for Tornado Cash, OFAC included as identifiers certain virtual currency wallet addresses associated with Tornado Cash, as well as the URL address for Tornado Cash’s website.  The Tornado Cash website has since been deleted from the Internet, but it currently remains available through certain Internet archives.

 

While engaging in any transaction with Tornado Cash or its blocked property or interests in property is prohibited for U.S. persons, interacting with open-source code itself in a way that does not involve a prohibited transaction with Tornado Cash is not prohibited.  For example, U.S. persons would not be prohibited by U.S. sanctions regulations from copying the open-source code and making it available online for others to view, as well as discussing, teaching about, or including open-source code in written publications, such as textbooks, absent additional facts.  Similarly, U.S. persons would not be prohibited by U.S. sanctions regulations from visiting the Internet archives for the Tornado Cash historical website, nor would they be prohibited from visiting the Tornado Cash website if it again becomes active on the Internet.

 

Question 1078: Do OFAC reporting obligations apply to “dusting” transactions?

 

Answer: OFAC is aware of reports following the August 8, 2022 designation of Tornado Cash that certain U.S. persons may have received unsolicited and nominal amounts of virtual currency or other virtual assets from Tornado Cash smart contracts, a practice commonly referred to as “dusting.”  Technically, OFAC’s regulations would apply to these transactions.  To the extent, however, these “dusting” transactions have no other sanctions nexus besides Tornado Cash, OFAC will not prioritize enforcement against the delayed receipt of initial blocking reports and subsequent annual reports of blocked property from such U.S. persons.  Persons who received a “dusting” transaction can also apply to OFAC for a specific license.

For guidance related to filing an initial and annual report of blocked property, please see FAQs 49, 50, and 646, respectively, and 31 C.F.R. § 501.603.  Please note that the annual filing requirement for 2022 applies only to persons holding blocked property as of June 30 of this year.


Question 1079: I sent the virtual currency to Tornado Cash but did not complete the mixing transaction or otherwise withdraw my virtual currency before Tornado Cash’s August 8, 2022 designation.  How can I complete the transaction or withdraw my virtual currency without violating U.S. sanctions regulations?

 

Answer: For transactions involving Tornado Cash that were initiated prior to its designation on August 8, 2022, but not completed by the date of designation, U.S. persons or persons conducting transactions within U.S. jurisdiction may request a specific license from OFAC to engage in transactions involving the subject virtual currency.  Applicants should be prepared to provide, at a minimum, all relevant information regarding these transactions with Tornado Cash, including the wallet addresses for the remitter and beneficiary, transaction hashes, the date and time of the transaction(s), as well as the amount(s) of virtual currency.  OFAC would have a favorable licensing policy towards such applications, provided that the transaction did not involve other sanctionable conduct.

 

In order to apply for a specific license to complete a transaction or withdraw virtual currency involving Tornado Cash that was deposited prior to its designation or to engage in other transactions or dealings with Tornado Cash, you are encouraged to file a licensing request by visiting the following link: https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/ofac-license-application-page.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1087 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221108 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/added/2022-11-08 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/updated/2022-11-08

 

*******

 

November 9, 2022: In coordination with partners in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom (UK), the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated Alex Adrianus Martinus Peijnenburg (Peijnenburg), Martinus Pterus Henri De Koning (De Koning), Matthew Simon Grimm (Grimm), and nine entities pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14059 for supplying illicit fentanyl, synthetic stimulants, cannabinoids, and opioids to U.S. markets through internet sales and a host of shell companies. This action represents the first use of E.O. 14059 to target those involved in the sale of illicit drugs purchased online and via darknet marketplaces.

 

The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) also designated two business associates of a sanctioned al-Qa’ida financial facilitator and external operations plotter. The two individuals designated are Mohamad Irshad Mohamad Haris Nizar and Musab Turkmen, who conducted businesses activities to assist Ahmed Luqman Talib (Talib), who was previously designated by OFAC for facilitating the international movement of individuals and finances in furtherance of al-Qa’ida’s objectives. Australian authorities arrested Talib on March 25, 2021, and days later charged him with plotting incursions into foreign states for the purpose of engaging in hostile activities.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • De Koning, Martinus Pterus Henrikus of The Netherlands;
  • Grimm, Matthew Simon of the United Kingdom and The Netherlands including his Digital Currency Addresses;
  • Haris Nizar, Mohamad Irshad Mohamadof Sri Lanka;
  • Peijnenburg, Alex Adrianus Martinus of The Netherlands including his Digital Currency Addresses; and
  • Turkmen, Musab of Turkey.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • A.M. Peijnenburg Holding B.V. of The Netherlands;
  • Bellizo, Huygensstraat of The Netherlands;
  • Best Sport Company B.V. of The Netherlands;
  • Best Sport Company of The Netherlands;
  • Erjm Limited of the United Kingdom;
  • Green District B.V. of The Netherlands;
  • King Trade B.V. of The Netherlands;
  • Natural Gifts B.V. of The Netherlands; and
  • Organic District B.V. of The Netherlands.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1089 and https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1088 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221109

 

*******

 

November 10, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is issuing Russia-related General License 8D, "Authorizing Transactions Related to Energy." All transactions prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 involving one or more of the following entities that are related to energy are authorized, through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, May 15, 2023:

(1) State Corporation Bank for Development and Foreign Economic Affairs Vnesheconombank;

(2) Public Joint Stock Company Bank Financial Corporation Otkritie;

(3) Sovcombank Open Joint Stock Company;

(4) Public Joint Stock Company Sberbank of Russia;

(5) VTB Bank Public Joint Stock Company;

(6) Joint Stock Company Alfa-Bank;

(7) Any entity in which one or more of the above persons own, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest; or

(8) the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.

 

For the purposes of this general license, the term “related to energy” means the extraction, production, refinement, liquefaction, gasification, regasification, conversion, enrichment, fabrication, transport, or purchase of petroleum, including crude oil, lease condensates, unfinished oils, natural gas liquids, petroleum products, natural gas, or other products capable of producing energy, such as coal, wood, or agricultural products used to manufacture biofuels, or uranium in any form, as well as the development, production, generation, transmission, or exchange of power, through any means, including nuclear, thermal, and renewable energy sources.

 

This general license does not authorize:

(1) Any transactions prohibited by Directive 1A under E.O. 14024, Prohibitions Related to Certain Sovereign Debt of the Russian Federation;

(2) The opening or maintaining of a correspondent account or payable-through account for or on behalf of any entity subject to Directive 2 under E.O. 14024, Prohibitions Related to Correspondent or Payable-Through Accounts and Processing of Transactions Involving Certain Foreign Financial Institutions;

(3) Any debit to an account on the books of a U.S. financial institution of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation; or

(4) Any transactions otherwise prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR), including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the RuHSR other than the blocked persons described above unless separately authorized.

 

Effective November 10, 2022, General License No. 8C, dated June 14, 2022, is replaced and superseded in its entirety by this General License No. 8D.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221110_44 and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl8d.pdf

 

*******

 

November 10, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is issuing Russia-related General License 53 "Authorizing Transactions for Diplomatic Missions of the Russian Federation Prohibited by Directive 4 under Executive Order 14024", and publishing one Russia-related Frequently Asked Question (1096).

 

Russia-related General License 53: U.S. persons are authorized to engage in all transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the official business of diplomatic or consular missions of the Government of the Russian Federation (“Russian missions”), where the transactions are prohibited by Directive 4 under Executive Order (E.O.) 14024, Prohibitions Related to Transactions Involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation.

 

U.S. persons are authorized to engage in all transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the compensation of employees of Russian missions, including payment of salaries and reimbursement of expenses, where the transactions are prohibited by Directive 4 under E.O. 14024.

 

This general license does not authorize:

(1) Any debit to an account on the books of a U.S. financial institution of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, or the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation; or

(2) Any transactions otherwise prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR), including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the RuHSR, unless separately authorized.

 

Question 1096: Do U.S. sanctions prohibit U.S. persons from engaging in transactions that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the official business of diplomatic or consular missions of the Government of the Russian Federation located in or outside the United States?

 

Answer: OFAC issued Russia-related General License (GL) 53 to authorize U.S. persons to engage in all transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the official business of diplomatic or consular missions of the Government of the Russian Federation (“Russian missions”), where the transactions are prohibited by Directive 4 under Executive Order (E.O.) 14024, Prohibitions Related to Transactions Involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation.  This authorization applies to transactions related to Russian missions located in or outside the United States.  For example, GL 53 authorizes the payment of salaries to employees of Russian missions that may otherwise be prohibited by Directive 4, such as a payment originated by the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation from a non-blocked Russian bank.  Importantly, GL 53 does not authorize any transactions involving blocked persons, including blocked Russian financial institutions; nor does it authorize debits to the accounts on the books of U.S. financial institutions of entities subject to Directive 4.  Non-U.S. persons may engage in transactions that are authorized for U.S. persons under this GL without risk of sanctions under E.O. 14024.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221110_33 and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl53.pdf and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/1096

 

*******

 

November 14, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), alongside the U.S. Department of State, sanctioned a transnational network procuring technology that supports the Russian military-industrial complex. OFAC also designated a global network of financial facilitators, enablers, and others associated with two key Kremlin-linked elites whose fortunes are intertwined with the West. In total, OFAC’s actions designated 14 individuals and 28 entities, and identified eight aircraft as blocked property.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Aliev, Murat Magomedovich of Russia;
  • Gadzhiev, Nariman Gadzhievich of Switzerland; United Arab Emirates; Saint Kitts and Nevis; and Russia;
  • Katz, Laurin of Switzerland;
  • Kerimov, Said Suleymanovich of Russia;
  • Kerimova, Amina Suleymanovna of Russia;
  • Kerimova, Firuza Nazimovna of Russia;
  • Kerimova, Gulnara Suleymanovna of Russia;
  • Leng, Holger of Estonia and Switzerland;
  • Pasche, Jacques of Switzerland;
  • Pavlyuk, Mikhail Ilyich of Armenia and Russia;
  • Rettich, Inga of Switzerland and Cyprus;
  • Studhalter, Alexander-Walter of Switzerland; United Kingdom; Luxembourg; Spain; Germany; and France;
  • Studhalter, Hugo Ange Christophe of France and Switzerland; and
  • Studhalter, Jeremy Eric Camille of France and Switzerland.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Adorabella AG of Russia and Switzerland;
  • Alstone Investment AG of France and Switzerland;
  • Bonum Capital Cyprus LTD of Cyprus;
  • Bonum Capital Investors Corp of the British Virgin Islands;
  • Chlodwig Enterprises AG of Russia and Switzerland;
  • Constellation Advisors LTD of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Emperor Aviation LTD of Russia;
  • Eurimo Holding SA of Luxembourg;
  • JSC Pkk Milandr of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company Aviakompaniya Dalnevostochnaya KSM of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company Bonum Capital of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company Bonum Investments of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company Bonum Management of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company Rb-Esteit of Russia;
  • MG International AG of Russia and Switzerland;
  • Milur Electronics LLC of Armenia;
  • Milur SA of Switzerland;
  • Papa Oscar Ventures GMBH of Germany;
  • Papa Oscar Ventures SE SL of Spain;
  • SCI AAA Properties of France;
  • Service Immobiliere Antibes SAS of France;
  • Service Immobiliere Et Gestion SAS of France;
  • Sharp Edge Engineering Inc. of Taiwan;
  • Studhalter International Group AG of Switzerland;
  • Swiss International Advisory Group AG of Switzerland;
  • Swiss International Real Estate Portfolio AG of Switzerland;
  • VH Antibes SAS of France; and
  • Villa Lexa Estates SAS of France.

 

The following aircraft have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Aircraft Tail Number 9H-AMN; Aircraft Model BD-700-1A11;
  • Aircraft Tail Number 9H-ARK; Aircraft Model BD-700-1A10;
  • Aircraft Tail Number 9H-EAA; Aircraft Model Citation XLS+;
  • Aircraft Tail Number 9H-MAO; Aircraft Model BD-700-1A10;
  • Aircraft Tail Number 9H-OKO; Aircraft Model G650;
  • Aircraft Tail Number 9H-SIS; Aircraft Model CL-600-2B16 (604 Variant);
  • Aircraft Tail Number 9H-SSK; Aircraft Model G650; and
  • Aircraft Tail Number 9H-TIO; Aircraft Model BD-700-1A11.

 

OFAC also issued Russia-related General License 40C "Civil Aviation Safety." All transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the provision, exportation, or reexportation of goods, technology, or services to ensure the safety of civil aviation involving one or more of the blocked entities that are prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 are authorized, provided that:

(1) The aircraft is registered in a jurisdiction solely outside of the Russian Federation; and

(2) The goods, technology, or services that are provided, exported, or reexported are for use on aircraft operated solely for civil aviation purposes.

 

This general license does not authorize:

(1) Any transactions prohibited by Directive 2 under E.O. 14024, Prohibitions Related to Correspondent or Payable-Through Accounts and Processing of Transactions Involving Certain Foreign Financial Institutions;

(2) Any transactions prohibited by Directive 4 under E.O. 14024, Prohibitions Related to Transactions Involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation; or

(3) Any transactions otherwise prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR), including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the RuHSR other than the blocked entities unless separately authorized.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1102 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221114 and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl40c.pdf

 

*******

 

November 15, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is sanctioning firms involved in the production or ongoing transfer to Russia of Iranian unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), which Russia has used in devastating attacks against civilian infrastructure in Ukraine. OFAC is designating Shahed Aviation Industries Research Center, the firm responsible for the design and production of Shahed-series UAVs being used by Russian forces in Ukraine. OFAC is also targeting Success Aviation Services FZC, and I Jet Global DMCC for facilitating the transfer of Iranian UAVs to Russia. The U.S. Department of State is concurrently designating Russian Private Military Company “Wagner” (PMC Wagner) and Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Aerospace Force (IRGC ASF) and Qods Aviation Industries pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14024. To supplement the U.S. Department of State’s designation of PMC Wagner, OFAC is also designating two individuals for facilitating PMC Wagner’s acquisition of UAVs from Iran, Abbas Djuma and Tigran Khristoforovich Srabionov.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Djuma, Abbas of Russia; and
  • Srabionov, Tigran Khristoforovich of Russia.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

  • I Jet Global DMCC of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Shahed Aviation Industries Research Center of Iran; and
  • Success Aviation Services FZC of the United Arab Emirates.

 

The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is issuing Counter Terrorism General License 21 "Authorizing Limited Safety and Environmental Transactions Involving Certain Vessels," and publishing one Counter Terrorism Frequently Asked Question (1097).

 

General License 21: All transactions that are ordinarily incident and necessary to one of the following activities involving the persons or vessels described below that are prohibited by the Global Terrorism Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 594 (GTSR), are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time, December 15, 2022, provided that any payment to a blocked person must be made into a blocked account in accordance with the GTSR:

(1) The safe docking and anchoring of any of the blocked vessels listed in paragraph (b) of this general license (“blocked vessels”) in port;

(2) The preservation of the health or safety of the crew of any of the blocked vessels; and

(3) Emergency repairs of any of the blocked vessels or environmental mitigation or protection activities relating to any of the blocked vessels.

 

The authorization of this general license applies to the following blocked persons and vessels listed on the Office of Foreign Assets Control’s Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List and any entity in which any of the following persons own, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest:

 

  • Artemov, Victor Sergioyovich;
  • Azul Vista Shipping Corp.;
  • Harbour Ship Management Limited;
  • Pontus Navigation Corp.;
  • Triton Navigation Corp.; and
  • Vista Clara Shipping Corp.

 

Question 1097: What does Counterterrorism-related General License 21 (GL 21) authorize?

 

Answer: GL 21 authorizes all activities otherwise prohibited by the Global Terrorism Sanctions Regulations (GTSR), 31 CFR part 594, that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the limited safety and environmental activities described in paragraph (a) of GL 21 involving certain blocked persons and vessels through 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time, December 15, 2022.  GL 21 does not authorize the offloading of any cargo onboard any of the blocked vessels listed in GL 21, and any payment of claims to or for the benefit of any blocked persons or vessels would require a specific license from OFAC.

 

After the expiration of GL 21, U.S. persons will be prohibited from engaging in any transactions with the blocked persons or vessels listed in GL 21, unless otherwise exempt or authorized by OFAC.  U.S. persons unable to conclude transactions authorized by GL 21 before 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time, December 15, 2022, are encouraged to seek guidance from OFAC.

 

 

Non-U.S. persons, including foreign financial institutions, generally do not risk exposure to sanctions for engaging in transactions with blocked persons where those transactions would not require a specific license if engaged in by a U.S. person.  Non-U.S. persons unable to conclude transactions authorized by GL 21 before 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time, December 15, 2022, are encouraged to seek guidance from OFAC.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1104 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221115 and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/ct_gl21.pdf and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/1097

 

*******

 

November 16, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is designating six senior employees of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), the Iranian state-run media corporation that has broadcast hundreds of forced confessions of Iranian, dual national, and international detainees in Iran. Designated in 2013, IRIB and its subsidiaries act not as objective media outlets but rather as a critical tool in the Iranian government’s mass suppression and censorship campaign against its own people. IRIB has produced and recently broadcast televised interviews of individuals being forced to confess that their relatives were not killed by Iranian authorities during nationwide protests but died due to accidental, unrelated causes.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Barmahani, Mohsen of Iran;
  • Jebelli, Peyman of Iran;
  • Noroozi, Ahmad of Iran;
  • Pouranvari, Yoosef of Iran;
  • Rezvani, Ali of Iran; and
  • Zabihpour, Ameneh Sadat of Iran.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1109 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221116

 

*******

 

November 17, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned 13 companies in multiple jurisdictions facilitating the sale of hundreds of millions of dollars worth of Iranian petrochemicals and petroleum products to buyers in East Asia on behalf of sanctioned Iranian petrochemical brokers Persian Gulf Petrochemical Industry Commercial Co. (PGPICC) and Triliance Petrochemical Co. Ltd. (Triliance), as well as the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) and its marketing arm, Naftiran Intertrade Company Ltd. (NICO). This action, the fifth round of designations targeting Iran’s illicit petroleum and petrochemical trade since June 2022, demonstrates OFAC’s determination to target sanction evasion efforts.

 

OFAC also designated La Nueva Familia Michoacana and its co-leaders, Johnny Hurtado Olascoaga (Johnny Hurtado) and Jose Alfredo Hurtado Olascoaga (Jose Hurtado), pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14059, for having engaged in, or attempted to engage in, activities or transactions that materially contributed to, or pose a significant risk of materially contributing to, the international proliferation of illicit drugs or their means of production. La Nueva Familia Michoacana smuggles illicit drugs into and throughout the United States. This organization is also behind the increasing U.S. presence of rainbow fentanyl, which, according to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), appears in the form of pills/powder that comes in a variety of bright colors, shapes, and sizes and is made to attract children and young users.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Hurtado Olascoaga, Johnny of Mexico;
  • Hurtado Olascoaga, Jose Alfredo of Mexico.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Access Technology Trading L.L.C. of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Asian Zone Trading L.L.C. of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Barza Style & Mode Co., Limited of China;
  • East Asia Trading Import And Export Trade Co., LTD. of the Marshall Islands and China;
  • Galaxy Petrochemical FZE of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Highline Logistic Hk Limited of China;
  • Hong Kong Aeonian Complex Co., Limited of China;
  • La Nueva Familia Michoacana of Mexico;
  • Monch General Trading L.L.C. of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Newton Trading FZE of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Sum Five Petrochemicals Trading L.L.C. of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Torgan Co., Limited of China;
  • Uteliz Resources Co., Limited of China; and
  • Zhejiang Wonder Imp. And Exp. Co., LTD. of China.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1115 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221117 and https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1116

 

*******

 

November 18, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued Russia-related General License 54. All transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the purchase or receipt of any debt or equity securities of VEON Ltd. that are prohibited by section 1(a)(i) of Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 are authorized, provided that the debt or equity securities were issued prior to June 6, 2022. Note to paragraph All transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to facilitating, clearing, and settling of transactions authorized by this general license that are prohibited by section 1(a)(i) of E.O. 14071 are authorized. This general license does not authorize any transactions otherwise prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR), including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the RuHSR, unless separately authorized.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl54.pdf and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221118_33

 

*******

 

November 18, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned one Russian national, Dmitry Kudryakov, and one Belarusian national, Iryna Litviniuk, for their role in exploiting the Guatemalan mining sector, as well as three associated entities connected with their corruption schemes. These individuals and entities are designated pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13818, which builds upon and implements the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act and targets perpetrators of serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Kudryakov, Dmitry of Russia;
  • Litviniuk, Iryna of Belarus.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Compania Guatemalteca De Niquel, Sociedad Anonima of Guatemala;
  • Compania Procesadora De Niquel De Izabal, S.A. of Guatemala; and
  • Mayaniquel, Sociedad Anonima of Guatemala.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1118 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221118

 

*******

 

November 21, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued Russia-related General License 13C "Authorizing Certain Administrative Transactions Prohibited by Directive 4 under Executive Order 14024." U.S. persons, or entities owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a U.S. person, are authorized to pay taxes, fees, or import duties, and purchase or receive permits, licenses, registrations, or certifications, to the extent such transactions are prohibited by Directive 4 under Executive Order 14024, Prohibitions Related to Transactions Involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, provided such transactions are ordinarily incident and necessary to the day-to-day operations in the Russian Federation of such U.S. persons or entities, through 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time, March 7, 2023.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221121 and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl13c.pdf

 

*******

 

November 21, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has published a Determination pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 to implement the price cap policy for crude oil of Russian Federation origin. Additionally, OFAC has published guidance on the implementation of the price cap policy for crude oil of Russian Federation origin. OFAC has also issued Russia-related General License 55, General License 56, and General License 57.

 

Pursuant to Sections l(a)(ii), l(b), and 5 of Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 of April 6, 2022 ("Prohibiting New Investment in and Certain Services to the Russian Federation in Response to Continued Russian Federation Aggression"), the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, determined that the prohibitions in Section l(a)(ii) of E.O. 14071 shall apply to the following categories of services as they relate to the maritime transport of crude oil of Russian Federation origin (collectively, the "Covered Services"):

  • Trading/commodities brokering;
  • Financing;
  • Shipping;
  • Insurance, including reinsurance and protection and indemnity;
  • Flagging; and
  • Customs brokering.

 

As a result, the following activities are prohibited, except to the extent provided by law, or unless licensed or otherwise authorized by the Office of Foreign Assets Control: the exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, from the United States, or by a United States person, wherever located, of any of the Covered Services to any person located in the Russian Federation. Notwithstanding that prohibition, the Covered Services are hereby authorized when the price of the crude oil of Russian Federation origin does not exceed the relevant price cap determined by the Secretary of the Treasury in consultation with the Secretary of State. The prohibitions on Covered Services in this determination shall take effect beginning at 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time on December 5, 2022. This determination excludes Covered Services with respect to crude oil of Russian Federation origin when such crude oil is loaded onto a vessel at the port of loading prior to 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time on December 5, 2022, and unloaded at the port of destination prior to 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time on January 19, 2023. See the link below for the full text of the Determination.

 

OFAC guidance on the implementation of the price cap policy for crude oil of Russian Federation origin. The United States is part of an international coalition, including the G7, the European Union, and Australia, that has agreed to prohibit the import of crude oil and petroleum products of Russian Federation origin (the “Price Cap Coalition”). These countries, home to many best-in-class financial and professional services, have also agreed to implement a policy with regard to a broad range of services as they relate to the maritime transport of crude oil and petroleum products of Russian Federation origin. This policy is known as the “price cap policy.” This document provides guidance on the implementation of the price cap policy for crude oil of Russian Federation origin (or “Russian oil”). OFAC anticipates publishing preliminary guidance on the implementation of the price cap policy for petroleum products of Russian Federation origin in the near future. The price cap policy is intended to maintain a reliable supply of oil to the global market while reducing the revenues the Russian Federation earns from oil after its own war of choice in Ukraine inflated global energy prices. See the link below for the full text of the guidance.

 

General License 55: All transactions prohibited by the determination of November 21, 2022, made pursuant to Section 1(a)(ii) of Executive Order 14071 (“Prohibitions on Certain Services as They Relate to the Maritime Transport of Crude Oil of Russian Federation Origin”) related to the maritime transport of crude oil originating from the Sakhalin-2 project (“Sakhalin-2 byproduct”) are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, September 30, 2023, provided that the Sakalin-2 byproduct is solely for importation into Japan.

 

General License 56: All transactions prohibited by the determination of November 21, 2022, made pursuant to Section 1(a)(ii) of Executive Order 14071 (“Prohibitions on Certain Services as They Relate to the Maritime Transport of Crude Oil of Russian Federation Origin”) related to the importation of crude oil into the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Croatia, or landlocked European Union Member States as described in Council Regulation (EU) 2022/879 of June 3, 2022, are authorized.

 

General License 57: All transactions prohibited by the determination of November 21, 2022, made pursuant to Section 1(a)(ii) of Executive Order 14071 (“Prohibitions on Certain Services as They Relate to the Maritime Transport of Crude Oil of Russian Federation Origin”) that are ordinarily incident and necessary to addressing vessel emergencies related to the health or safety of the crew or environmental protection, including safe docking or anchoring, emergency repairs, or salvage operations, are authorized.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221122 and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/determination_11222022_eo14071.pdf and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/price_cap_policy_guidance_11222022.pdf and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl55.pdf and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl56.pdf and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl57.pdf

 

*******

 

November 23, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated three Iranian security officials for the Iranian regime’s continued crackdown on ongoing protests throughout the country, including most recently in Kurdish areas. The Iranian regime has increased its aggressive actions against the Iranian people as part of its ongoing suppression of peaceful protests against a regime that denies human rights and fundamental freedoms to its people, especially women and girls.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Asgari, Hassan of Iran;
  • Moradi, Alireza of Iran;
  • Osanloo, Mohammad Taghi of Iran.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221123 and https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1125

 

*******

 

November 26, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is issuing Venezuela-related General License 8K, "Authorizing Transactions Involving Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PdVSA) Necessary for the Limited Maintenance of Essential Operations in Venezuela or the Wind Down of Operations in Venezuela for Certain Entities" and Venezuela-related General License 41, "Authorizing Certain Transactions Related to Chevron Corporation’s Joint Ventures in Venezuela."  Additionally, OFAC is issuing two new Venezuela-related Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs 1098 and 1099).

 

General License 8K: All transactions and activities prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 13850 of November 1, 2018, as amended by E.O. 13857 of January 25, 2019, or E.O. 13884 of August 5, 2019, each as incorporated into the Venezuela Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 591 (the VSR), that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the limited maintenance of essential operations, contracts, or other agreements, that: (i) are for safety or the preservation of assets in Venezuela; (ii) involve PdVSA or any entity in which PdVSA owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest; and (iii) were in effect prior to July 26, 2019, is authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, May 26, 2023, for the following entities and their subsidiaries (collectively, the “Covered Entities”):

  • Halliburton;
  • Schlumberger Limited;
  • Baker Hughes Holdings LLC; and
  • Weatherford International, Public Limited Company.

 

General License 41: All transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the following activities for or related to the operation and management by Chevron Corporation or its subsidiaries (“Chevron”) of Chevron’s joint ventures in Venezuela (collectively, the “Chevron JVs”) involving Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PdVSA) or any entity in which PdVSA owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest, that are prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 13850, as amended by E.O. 13857, or E.O. 13884, each as incorporated into the Venezuela Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 591 (the VSR), are authorized:

(1) Production and lifting of petroleum or petroleum products produced by the Chevron JVs, and any related maintenance, repair, or servicing of the Chevron JVs;

(2) Sale to, exportation to, or importation into the United States of petroleum or petroleum products produced by the Chevron JVs, provided that the petroleum and petroleum products produced by the Chevron JVs are first sold to Chevron;

(3) Ensuring the health or safety of personnel or the integrity of operations or assets of the Chevron JVs in Venezuela; and

(4) Purchase and importation into Venezuela of goods or inputs related to the activities described in paragraphs (a)(1)–(3) of this general license, including diluents, condensates, petroleum, or natural gas products.

 

Question 1098: Does Venezuela General License (GL) 41 authorize U.S. persons to provide goods or services for Chevron Corporation’s (Chevron) operation and management of its joint ventures (JVs) in Venezuela?

 

Answer: Yes, provided that such goods and services are for certain activities related to the operation and management of Chevron’s joint ventures in Venezuela, as specified in GL 41.  Such activities include, among others, the production and lifting of petroleum or petroleum products produced by Chevron’s JVs; related maintenance, repair, or servicing of the Chevron JVs; sale of petroleum or petroleum products to the United States produced by the Chevron JVs, provided that the petroleum and petroleum products produced by the Chevron JVs are first sold to Chevron; the procurement and import into Venezuela of goods or other inputs for authorized activities; and the processing of payments by U.S. financial institutions related to the foregoing activities.  Please see GL 41 for a complete list of authorized activities and associated conditions.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221126 and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/venezuela_gl8k.pdf and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/venezuela_gl41.pdf and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/added/2022-11-26


Question 1099: Do non-U.S. persons risk exposure to U.S. sanctions for facilitating transactions related to Chevron Corporation (Chevron) and its joint ventures in Venezuela that are authorized pursuant to Venezuela General License (GL) 41?

 

Answer: No. Non-U.S. persons, including foreign financial institutions, generally do not risk exposure to U.S. sanctions for facilitating transactions or payments for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, Chevron, its subsidiaries, joint ventures, or contractors that are authorized pursuant to Venezuela GL 41.  Non-U.S. persons generally do not risk exposure to the U.S. blocking sanctions under the Venezuela Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR Part 591, for engaging in transactions with blocked persons, where those transactions would not require a specific license if engaged in by a U.S. person.

 

*******

 

November 30, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated the following individuals due to their ties to international terrorism and ties to Al-Qa'ida in the Indian subcontinent.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Deroji, Mufti Hazrat of Pakistan;
  • Ghouri, Atif Yahya of Afghanistan and Pakistan;
  • Maruf, Muhammad of Afghanistan and Pakistan; and
  • Mehmood, Osama of Afghanistan and Pakistan.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221130

 

*******

 

Fines and Penalties

 

November 3, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 66259: The U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has denied Jose Martin Gallegos-Luevanos’ (“Gallegos-Luevanos”) export privileges under the Regulations for a period of 10 years from the date of Gallegos-Luevanos's conviction. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Gallegos-Luevanos had an interest at the time of conviction.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/11/03/2022-23894/in-the-matter-of-jose-martin-gallegos-luevanos-inmate-number-94641-479-fci-pollock-federal

 

*******

 

On January 6, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Gallegos-Luevanos was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. 554(a). Specifically, Gallegos-Luevanos was convicted of fraudulently and knowingly attempting to export from the United States to Mexico one Barret .50 caliber bolt rifle, three FA Cugir Romanian AK-47 rifles, seven Century Arms VSKA AK-47 rifles, one Century Arms WASR AK-47 rifle, and 85 assorted magazines, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 554. As a result of his conviction, the Court sentenced Gallegos-Luevanos to 48 months in prison, three years supervised release, and a $100 court assessment.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/11/03/2022-23894/in-the-matter-of-jose-martin-gallegos-luevanos-inmate-number-94641-479-fci-pollock-federal

 

*******

 

November 7, 2022: The Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce (“BIS”), issued a 15-count charging letter against Mohammad Alhamra (“Alhamra”) and WEBS Electronics Trading Company LLC (“WEBS”) of the United Arab Emirates (“UAE”) have violated the Export Administration Regulations (“the Regulations” or “the EAR”). The Charging Letter alleges violations of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) related to exports of U.S. telecommunications equipment and related commodities to Syria and Iran and misrepresentations and concealment of facts to BIS officials regarding these exports. See all 14 counts at the following link:

 

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/export-violations-2022/1420-alhamra-webs-charging-letter-final/file

 

*******

 

November 9, 2022: The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that Phil Pascoe, 60, of Floyds Knobs, Indiana; Monica Pascoe, 45, of Floyds Knobs, Indiana; Scott Tubbs, 59, of Georgetown, Kentucky; and Quadrant Magnetics LLC are charged with wire fraud, violations of the Arms Export Control Act, and smuggling of goods for their roles in an illegal scheme to send export-controlled defense-related technical data to China and to unlawfully supply U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) with Chinese-origin rare earth magnets for aviation systems and military items.

 

The indictment alleges that between January 2012 and December 2018, the defendants conspired to send approximately 70 drawings containing export-controlled technical data to a company located in China without a license from the U.S. government, in violation of the Arms Export Control Act and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations. The technical data drawings were the property of two U.S. companies and related to end-use items for aviation, submarine, radar, tank, mortars, missiles, infrared and thermal imaging targeting systems, and fire control systems for DOD.

 

The indictment further alleges that Quadrant Magnetics imported rare earth magnets that were smelted and magnetized by a company in China. Quadrant then sold these magnets to two U.S. companies which included them in components sold to DOD for use in the F-16, the F-18, and other defense assets in violation of the Defense Acquisition Regulations System (DFARS). Under the DFARS specialty metal clause, rare earth magnets sold to DOD must be produced and magnetized in the United States or an approved country. China is not an approved country.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/three-arrested-illegal-scheme-export-controlled-data-and-defraud-department-defense

 

*******

 

November 16, 2022: Yanjun Xu, 42, the first Chinese government intelligence officer ever to be extradited to the United States to stand trial, was sentenced in federal court in Cincinnati. Xu was sentenced to 20 years in prison. According to court documents, Xu targeted American aviation companies, recruited employees to travel to China, and solicited their proprietary information, all on behalf of the government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). On Nov. 5, 2021, a federal jury in Cincinnati convicted Xu on all counts: conspiracy to commit economic espionage, conspiracy to commit trade secret theft, attempted economic espionage, and attempted trade secret theft.

 

Xu was a career intelligence officer, beginning in 2003 and rising to the rank of deputy division director at the Chinese Ministry of State Security (MSS), the intelligence and security agency for China. According to court documents and trial testimony, beginning in at least December 2013, Xu targeted specific companies in the United States and abroad that are recognized as leaders in the field of aviation.

Xu used aliases, front companies, and universities to deceive aviation employees and solicit information. He identified individuals who worked for the companies and recruited them to travel to China, often initially under the guise that they were traveling to give a presentation at a university. Xu and others paid the individuals stipends on top of covering travel costs.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/chinese-government-intelligence-officer-sentenced-20-years-prison-espionage-crimes-attempting

 

*******

 

November 21, 2022: The Justice Department announced that it has reached a settlement agreement with Aero Precision LLC, a Washington state firearm manufacturer. The settlement resolves the department’s determination that Aero Precision had a policy of unlawfully screening out certain non-U.S. citizen job candidates, including asylees and refugees, in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Under governing law, asylees and refugees have the same eligibility to work in jobs involving access to sensitive defense-related information as U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents, and would have to pass the same background check as other employees if an employer requires one.

 

The department’s investigation determined that from at least April 2020 until September 2020, Aero Precision routinely implemented a hiring policy that screened out eligible candidates who were not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents. Firearm manufacturers in the United States are subject to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), which regulate specific exports of defense articles and services. Absent State Department authorization, employers subject to these regulations must limit access to certain sensitive information to “U.S. persons,” which are defined as U.S. citizens, U.S. nationals, lawful permanent residents, asylees, and refugees. The ITAR thus does not authorize or require employers to exclude asylees and refugees from consideration and hire only U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents. By limiting hiring to just U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents, Aero Precision placed unnecessary hiring restrictions on its workforce. Under the settlement, Aero Precision must train staff on the requirements of the INA’s anti-discrimination provision, review its policies to ensure compliance with relevant law, and be subject to departmental monitoring and reporting requirements.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-secures-settlement-firearm-manufacturer-resolve-immigration-related

 

*******

 

November 28, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced a settlement with Payward, Inc. d/b/a Kraken ("Kraken"), a Delaware-incorporated virtual currency exchange with operations in the United States and elsewhere.  Kraken agreed to remit $362,158.70 to settle its potential civil liability for apparent violations of sanctions against Iran.  As part of its settlement with OFAC, Kraken also has agreed to invest an additional $100,000 in certain sanctions compliance controls.  Due to Kraken’s failure to timely implement appropriate geolocation tools, including an automated internet protocol (IP) address blocking system, Kraken exported services to users who appeared to be in Iran when they engaged in virtual currency transactions on Kraken’s platform.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221128 and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/20221128_kraken.pdf

 

*******

 

November 29, 2022: An indictment was unsealed, charging Ray Hunt, 69, of Madison County, Alabama, with federal offenses related to an illegal scheme to export U.S.-origin goods to Iran. The 15-count indictment charges the defendant with conspiracy to defraud the United States, sanctions violations, smuggling goods from the United States, and submitting false or misleading export information.  According to the indictment, since at least November 2017, the defendant conspired to export U.S.-origin parts used in the oil and gas industry, including control valves and oil tubing, through his Alabama-based company, Vega Tools LLC, to customers in Iran. The defendant transshipped the goods to Iran through Turkey and the UAE to evade U.S. sanctions.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/alabama-man-indicted-violating-us-sanctions-against-iran

 

NOVEMBER 2022 EXPORT CONTROLS AND COMPLIANCE UPDATE Read More »

OCTOBER 2022 EXPORT CONTROLS AND COMPLIANCE UPDATE

This newsletter is a listing of the latest changes in export control regulations through October 31, 2022.  The newsletter is provided as a complimentary service to assist exporters with their ITAR and EAR export compliance responsibilities. It provides a summary of recent changes to export control regulations or other regulatory matters of interest that may impact your company’s international trade and export compliance functions. Call us at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net with questions or comments.

 

See also our “Latest Sanctions Fines & Penalties” section below for an update on companies and persons denied export privileges by the United States Government.

 

REGULATORY UPDATES

 

The President

 

President Biden Terminated Designation of Afghanistan as a Major Non-NATO Ally

 

October 4, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 60057: President Biden terminated the designation of Afghanistan as a Major Non-NATO Ally of the United States for the purposes of the Act and the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.).

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/04/2022-21654/terminating-the-designation-of-afghanistan-as-a-major-non-nato-ally

 

*******

 

President Continues National Emergency For 1 Year With Respect to Syria

 

October 14, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 62281: By Executive Order 13894, the President declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the situation in and in relation to Syria.

 

The situation in and in relation to Syria, and in particular the actions by the Government of Turkey to conduct a military offensive into northeast Syria, undermines the campaign to defeat the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, or ISIS, endangers civilians, and further threatens to undermine the peace, security, and stability in the region, and continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13894 of October 14, 2019, must continue in effect beyond October 14, 2022. Therefore, the President continued for one year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13894 with respect to the situation in and in relation to Syria.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/13/2022-22472/continuation-of-the-national-emergency-with-respect-to-the-situation-in-and-in-relation-to-syria

 

*******

 

President Continues For 1 Year the National Emergency With Respect to the Democratic Republic of the Congo

 

October 17, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 62975: The situation in or in relation to the Democratic Republic of the Congo continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13413 of October 27, 2006, as amended by Executive Order 13671 of July 8, 2014, must continue in effect beyond October 27, 2022. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), President Biden continued for one year the national emergency with respect to the situation in or in relation to the Democratic Republic of the Congo declared in Executive Order 13413, as amended by Executive Order 13671.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/17/2022-22672/continuation-of-the-national-emergency-with-respect-to-the-democratic-republic-of-the-congo

 

*******

 

Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC)

 

Secretary Of State Certification Of Statutory Requirements: Upcoming Change To The Policy Of Denial For The Republic Of Cyprus

 

September 16, 2022: Secretary Blinken has determined and certified to Congress that the Republic of Cyprus has met the necessary conditions under the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 (P.L. 116-92) and the Eastern Mediterranean Security and Energy Partnership Act of 2019 (Div. J. P.L. 116-94) to allow the Department to approve exports, reexports, and transfers of defense articles to the Republic of Cyprus for FY 2023.

 

Therefore, in the near future, the Department will be publishing a Federal Register notice amending the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) § 126.1(r) to specify that the policy of denial as described in § 126.1(r) shall not apply with respect to exports, reexports, and transfers to the Republic of Cyprus for FY 2023 and to specify that the Republic of Cyprus’ status as a proscribed destination is also suspended for the fiscal year 2023 with respect to exports, reexports, and transfers.

 

Editors note: This article was inadvertently left off of the September 2022 Newsletter.

 

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_public_portal_news_and_events&timeframe=all&cat=Notice

 

*******

 

DDTC Name And Address Changes Posted To Website

 

October 4 through 11, 2022: The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) posted the following name and/or address changes on its website at    

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_kb_article_page&sys_id=bd72ca0adbf8d30044f9ff621f961981:

  • Change in Address for PHI International Australia Pty Ltd from 50 Kings Park Road, West Perth, Australia, 6005 to PHI International Australia Pty Ltd at Level 6, 1100 Hay Street, West Perth, Australia, 6005;
  • Change in Name from Eurocopter Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to Airbus Helicopters Arabia for Aircraft Maintenance due to corporate rebranding;
  • Change in Name and Ownership from Progeny Systems Corporation to Progeny Systems, LLC due to acquisition by General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.

 

*******

 

The Department Of State Issued A 60 Day Notice Of Four Proposed Information Collections

 

October 18, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 63145: The Department of State issued a 60-day notice of four proposed information collections:

  • Request for Approval of Manufacturing License Agreements, Technical Assistance Agreements, and Other Agreements;
  • Maintenance of Records by DDTC Registrants
  • Annual Brokering Report; and
  • Brokering Prior Approval (License).

 

The Department of State will accept comments from the public up to December 19, 2022.

 

Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

  • Web: Persons with access to the internet may comment on this notice by going to www.Regulations.gov. You can search for the document by entering “Docket Number: DOS-2022-0034” in the Search field. Then click the “Comment Now” button and complete the comment form.
  • Email: DDTCPublicComments@state.gov.
  • Regular Mail: Send written comments to: The public may mail comments to the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, Department of State, 2401 E St NW, Suite H1205, Washington, DC 20522.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/18/2022-22584/60-day-notice-of-four-proposed-information-collections-request-for-approval-of-manufacturing-license

 

*******

 

Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

 

BIS Updates Policy Regarding Enforcement Of The Antiboycott Rules

 

October 6, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 60890: The Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) updated its policy regarding enforcement of the antiboycott rules. The amendment took effect on October 7, 2022, and clarifies the categories of antiboycott violations and their associated penalties to ensure appropriate actions are taken based on the seriousness of the violation.

 

Summaries of the four enhancements to strengthen the antiboycott enforcement program are below:

 

  1. Enhanced Penalties. Penalty amounts imposed will reflect BIS’s assessment of the seriousness of the violation and will be commensurate with the harm caused. Because not all antiboycott violations are equivalent in seriousness, BIS will continue to seek different levels of penalties depending on the different nature of the antiboycott violation. For the most serious violations – those in Category A under our regulations – BIS will begin its penalty calculus with the maximum penalty under the Anti-Boycott Act of 2018. BIS Antiboycott regulations have long provided for the imposition of the maximum penalty for Category A violations. All Category A violations will be subject to the maximum penalty as the starting point in our penalty calculus. For violations of Category B, penalties will be enhanced as well. Penalties must be high enough to both punish those who violate the antiboycott rules and deter those who would violate them. This means that penalties for Category C violations will also be increased.

 

  1. Reprioritized Violation Categories. BIS has revised the Antiboycott Penalty Guidance to recategorize certain antiboycott violations in a manner that reflects BIS’s current view of their relative seriousness. A rulemaking amendment to the Export Administration Regulations reprioritizing certain categories of antiboycott violations went into effect on October 7, 2022.

 

  1. Admissions of Misconduct. In the past, when BIS has resolved matters involving violations of the antiboycott rules, BIS has allowed companies to pay a reduced penalty without admitting misconduct. These “no admit/no deny” settlements had the advantage of making it easier to reach a resolution but also had two serious disadvantages. First, because there was no admission in such cases, there was no admitted statement of facts, i.e., no factual recitation making clear what got the company into trouble. Without such an admitted statement of facts, it is more difficult for other companies to learn from their peers’ mistakes and adjust their behavior accordingly. Second, companies get a significant reduction in a penalty when they resolve matters short of trial. BIS wants companies to resolve matters and want to incentivize them to do so. But in other enforcement contexts, including in BIS administrative export enforcement cases, companies must admit their conduct in order to obtain a resolution. The same will now be true in administrative antiboycott enforcement cases as well. Under the new policy, BIS will require those who enter into settlement agreements for antiboycott violations to admit to a statement of facts outlining their conduct as part of the settlement agreement.

 

  1. Renewed Focus on Foreign Subsidiaries of U.S. Companies. Violations of our antiboycott rules have traditionally resulted in consequences being imposed on the U.S. parties receiving the boycott-related requests (for complying with or failing to report receipt of such requests) and not on the parties making them. The penalties BIS imposes on U.S. recipients help to deter them from complying with boycott-related requests by attaching significant costs on the back end. But this is only one side of the equation. BIS wants to dissuade foreign parties from making those requests in the first place. Going forward, BIS will be more aggressive in exploring ways to deter foreign parties from issuing or making boycott requests of U.S. persons. In particular, BIS will bring a renewed focus to its enforcement efforts against controlled foreign subsidiaries of U.S. parent companies when they act in violation of our antiboycott regulations.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/07/2022-21713/export-administration-regulations-guidance-on-penalty-determinations-in-the-settlement-of and

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/about-bis/newsroom/press-releases/3155-2022-10-06-bis-press-release-enhancing-antiboycott-enforcement-final-1/file

 

*******

 

 

 

 

 

Commerce Implements LANDMARK New Export Controls On Advanced Computing And Semiconductor Manufacturing Items to the People’s Republic of China (PRC)

 

October 7, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 62186 and 87 Fed. Reg. 61971: The Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) implemented a series of targeted updates to its export controls as part of BIS’s ongoing efforts to protect U.S. national security and foreign policy interests. These updates will restrict the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC’s) ability to both purchase and manufacture certain high-end chips used in military applications and build on prior policies, company-specific actions, and less public regulatory, legal, and enforcement actions taken by BIS. The export controls announced in the two rules restrict the PRC’s ability to obtain advanced computing chips, develop and maintain supercomputers, and manufacture advanced semiconductors. These items and capabilities are used by the PRC to produce advanced military systems, including weapons of mass destruction; improve the speed and accuracy of its military decision-making, planning, and logistics, as well as of its autonomous military systems; and commit human rights abuses. Finally, these rules make clear that foreign government actions that prevent BIS from making compliance determinations will impact a company’s access to U.S. technology through addition to the Entity List.

 

BIS’s rule on advanced computing and semiconductor manufacturing addresses U.S. national security and foreign policy concerns in two key areas. First, the rule imposes restrictive export controls on certain advanced computing semiconductor chips, transactions for supercomputer end-uses, and transactions involving certain entities on the Entity List. Second, the rule imposes new controls on certain semiconductor manufacturing items and on transactions for certain integrated circuit (IC) end uses. Specifically, the rule:

1.) Adds certain advanced and high-performance computing chips and computer commodities that contain such chips to the Commerce Control List (CCL) in new ECCNs 3A090 and 4A090;

2.) Adds new license requirements for items destined for a supercomputer or semiconductor development or production end use in the PRC;

3.) Expands the scope of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) Foreign Direct Product Rule over certain foreign-produced advanced computing items and foreign-produced items for supercomputer end uses;

4.) Expands the scope of the Foreign Direct Product Rule for foreign-produced items subjecting them to license requirements to twenty-eight existing entities on the Entity List that are located in the PRC;

5.) Adds certain semiconductor manufacturing equipment and related items to the CCL under a new ECCN 3B090;

6.) Adds new license requirements for items destined to a semiconductor fabrication “facility” in the PRC that fabricates ICs meeting specified. Licenses for facilities owned by PRC entities will face a “presumption of denial,” and facilities owned by multinationals will be decided on a case-by-case basis. The relevant thresholds are as follows:

  • Logic chips with non-planar transistor architectures (I.e., FinFET or GAAFET) of 16nm or 14nm, or below;
  • DRAM memory chips of 18nm half-pitch or less;
  • NAND flash memory chips with 128 layers or more.

 

7.) Restricts the ability of U.S. persons to support the development, or production, of ICs at certain PRC-located semiconductor fabrication “facilities” without a license;

8.) Adds new license requirements to export items to develop or produce semiconductor manufacturing equipment and related items; and

9.) Establishes a Temporary General License (TGL) to minimize the short-term impact on the semiconductor supply chain by allowing specific, limited manufacturing activities related to items destined for use outside the PRC.

 

The rule was effective in phases after being filed for Public Inspection with the Federal Register. The semiconductor manufacturing items restrictions were effective upon filing for Public Inspection (October 7, 2022), the restrictions on U.S. persons’ ability to support the development, production, or use of ICs at certain PRC-located semiconductor fabrication “facilities” was effective five days later (October 12, 2022), and the advanced computing and supercomputer controls, as well as the other changes in the rule, was effective 14 days later (October 21, 2022). Additionally, public comments on all of these changes are due to BIS no later than 60 days from the date of Federal Register publication.

 

Editors Note: The requirements for compliance with the new rule is extremely complicated. If your company products or services in any way can be used in semiconductor manufacturing or advanced computing, please contract us for guidance before continuing business activities in China or Hong Kong.

 

Revisions to BIS’s Unverified List:

 

In the same rule making, BIS also updated its regulations related to BIS’s Entity List to clarify that a sustained lack of cooperation by the host government that effectively prevents BIS from determining compliance with the EAR may lead to the addition of an entity to the Entity List. The rule provides an example that stipulates that a sustained lack of cooperation by a foreign government that prevents BIS from verifying the bona fides of companies on the Unverified List (UVL) can result in those parties being moved to the Entity List.  If an end-use check is not timely scheduled and completed. All additions, removals, or revisions to the Entity List are still subject to the approval of the End-User Review Committee, which is made up of the Departments of Commerce, State, Defense, and Energy pursuant to existing rules. The rule adds 31 new entities to the UVL and removes nine entities that have met relevant requirements. Consistent with this regulatory change, Export Enforcement has issued a policy memorandum Addressing Foreign Government Prevention of End-Use Checks. The policy calls for adding parties to the Unverified List 60 days after checks are requested, but host government inaction prevents their completion and an additional 60-day process for adding UVL parties to the Entity List when there is a sustained lack of cooperation by a host government to facilitate completion of the checks.

 

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/about-bis/newsroom/press-releases/3158-2022-10-07-bis-press-release-advanced-computing-and-semiconductor-manufacturing-controls-final/file and https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/13/2022-21658/implementation-of-additional-export-controls-certain-advanced-computing-and-semiconductor and https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/13/2022-21714/revisions-to-the-unverified-list-clarifications-to-activities-and-criteria-that-may-lead-to

 

*******

 

BIS Adds 31 Persons To The Unverified List

 

October 14, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg 61971: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) amended the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by adding 31 persons to the Unverified List (UVL). The 31 persons were added to the UVL on the basis that BIS was unable to verify their bona fides because an end-use check could not be completed satisfactorily for reasons outside the U.S. Government's control. All 31 persons are being added under the destination of the People's Republic of China (China). This rule also removed nine persons, all under the destination of China, from the UVL because BIS was able to verify their bona fides. With this final rule, BIS also clarified the activities and criteria that may lead to the addition of an entity to the Entity List, including a sustained lack of cooperation by the host government (e.g., the government of the country in which an end-use check is to be conducted) that effectively prevents BIS from determining compliance with the EAR.

 

China

  • Beijing Naura Magnetoelectric Technology Co., Ltd.;
  • Beijing PowerMac Company;
  • CCIC Southern Electronic Product Testing Co., Ltd.;
  • Chang Zhou Jin Tan Teng Yuan Machinery Parts Co., Ltd.;
  • Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences;
  • Chinese Academy of Science (CAS) Institute of Chemistry;
  • Chongqing Optel Telecom;
  • Chongqing Xinyuhang Technology Co., Ltd.;
  • Dandong Nondestructive Electronics;
  • DK Laser Company Ltd.;
  • Foshan Huaguo Optical Co., Ltd.;
  • GRG Metrology & Test (Chongqing) Co., Ltd.;
  • Guangdong Dongling Carbon Tech. Co., Ltd.;
  • Guangxi Yuchai Machinery Co., Ltd.;
  • Guangzhou GRG Metrology & Test (Beijing) Co., Ltd.;
  • Jialin Precision Optics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.;
  • Lishui Zhengyang Electric Power Construction;
  • Nanjing Gova Technology Co., Ltd.;
  • Ningbo III Lasers Technology Co., Ltd.;
  • Qingdao Sci-Tech Innovation Quality Testing Co., Ltd.;
  • Shanghai Tech University;
  • Suzhou Sen-Chuan Machinery Technology Co., Ltd.;
  • Tianjin Optical Valley Technology Co., Ltd.;
  • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences;
  • University of Shanghai for Science and Technology;
  • Vital Advanced Materials Co., Ltd.;
  • Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd.;
  • Wuhan Juhere Photonic Tech Co., Ltd.;
  • Wuxi Hengling Technology Co., Ltd.;
  • Xian Zhongsheng Shengyuan Technology Co., Ltd.; and
  • Yangtze Memory Technologies Co., Ltd.

 

This final rule removed nine persons from the UVL after BIS was able to verify their bona fides. This rule removed:

 

  • Anhui Institute of Metrology;
  • Chuzhou HKC Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd.;
  • Hefei Anxin Reed Precision Co. Ltd.;
  • Hefei Institutes of Physical Science;
  • Jiutian Intelligent Equipment Co. Ltd.;
  • Suzhou Gyz Electronic Technology Co. Ltd.;
  • Suzhou Lylap Mould Technology Co Ltd.;
  • Wuxi Biologics Co., Ltd.; and
  • Wuxi Turbine Blade Co., Ltd.

 

The inability of BIS to determine compliance with the EAR because of a host government's action or inaction creates a circumstance that may place an entity at significant risk of being or becoming involved in activities contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States. For example, as previously mentioned, BIS frequently conducts end-use checks of foreign parties to verify their bona fides, thereby mitigating the risk of diversion of items subject to the EAR. If BIS is unable to conduct timely end-use checks, BIS's ability to prevent diversion and resolve concerns about potentially problematic end uses and users is negatively impacted. The sustained and deliberate prevention of an end-use check by a foreign government is, therefore, contrary to the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States. Further, the inability of an entity to receive a timely end-use check could lead to the determination that it is at significant risk of involvement in activities contrary to U.S. national security or foreign policy interests, leading to concerns regarding its receipt of items subject to the EAR. To better reflect the nature of the risk presented by such entities, when the risk assessed is the result of the actions of the relevant host government authority rather than the actions of the entities themselves, BIS revised the heading of § 744.11, as well as the introductory text of § 744.11 and § 744.11(b), by adding language to also refer to entities that are “at significant risk” of acting contrary to the foreign policy and national security interests of the United States.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/13/2022-21714/revisions-to-the-unverified-list-clarifications-to-activities-and-criteria-that-may-lead-to

 

********

 

Samsung Electronics Co. Granted One-Year Exemption From BIS’ Export Controls On Advanced Computing And Semiconductor Manufacturing Items to the People’s Republic of China (PRC)

 

October 14, 2022: As reported in the Wall Street Journal,  Samsung Electronics Co. has been granted a one-year exemption from the new U.S. rules curbing China’s chip industry, joining a list of semiconductor companies that have received dispensation.

The U.S. Department of Commerce granted Samsung authorization to continue receiving chip-making equipment and other items needed to maintain its memory-chip production in China. The South Korean company operates chip facilities in two Chinese cities.

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/samsung-gets-one-year-exemption-from-new-u-s-chip-restrictions-on-china-11665639994?page=1

 

*******

 

Department of the Treasury

 

List Of Countries That May Require Participation In An International Boycott

 

October 3, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 59866: In accordance with section 999(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the U.S. Department of the Treasury has published the following list of countries that require or may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986):

  • Iraq;
  • Kuwait;
  • Lebanon;
  • Libya;
  • Qatar;
  • Saudi Arabia;
  • Syria; and
  • Yemen.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/03/2022-21397/list-of-countries-requiring-cooperation-with-an-international-boycott

 

*******

 

Census Bureau

 

Cancellation of the Advanced Export Information (AEI) Pilot Program

 

October 14, 2022: The Census Bureau’s Economic Management Division (EMD) announces that the Census Bureau, in cooperation with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), has decided to cancel the Advanced Export Information (AEI) Pilot Program. This decision to eliminate the AEI pilot program as an AES filing option was made because the Census Bureau was unable to conduct sufficient analysis and evaluation of the pilot program due to a lack of adequate participation.

 

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-10-14/pdf/2022-21748.pdf?utm_campaign=&utm_content=&utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery

 

*******

 

Disclosure Of Electronic Export Information (EEI) To Foreign Entities And Foreign Governments Is Not Permitted

 

October 27, 2022: Over the last several months, the U.S. Census Bureau (Census Bureau) has seen an increase in inquiries from foreign governments for copies of Electronic Export Information (EEI).  The Census Bureau has also received inquiries from Industry about specific countries requiring EEI-related documentation, such as the Internal Transaction Number (ITN).

The information contained in the EEI is confidential, pursuant to U.S. law (13 U.S.C. §301(g)). The specific confidentiality provisions on the release of the EEI are contained in the Foreign Trade Regulations (FTR), Title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 30.60.  As stated in Section 30.60(c)(4) of the FTR, you may not provide the EEI to a foreign government for any purpose.

The EEI filing is required to satisfy U.S. regulatory requirements, not the needs of foreign governments.  In place of providing the EEI to the foreign government, it is acceptable to provide the ITN since it is not considered a data element as defined in Section 30.6 of the FTR.  However, if your shipment did not require EEI filing because the shipment was excluded or exempted from filing requirements, then the citation that was used in place of the ITN can be provided (i.e., post departure filing citation, AES downtime filing citation, and FTR exemption or exclusion).   Additionally, documents that do not have confidentiality restrictions, such as an invoice or commercial loading document, can be provided to the foreign government for shipment verification to occur.  Lastly, you can also provide the official response from the Census Bureau on letterhead indicating that EEI cannot be provided to foreign entities or governments under U.S. law, which is available below.

 

https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/regulations/ftrletters/FTR_LETTERS_05182020.pdf?utm_campaign=&utm_content=&utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery

 

*******

 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF)

 

October 20, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 63800: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), Department of Justice (DOJ), submitted the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed collection OMB 1140-0005 (Application and Permit for Importation of Firearms, Ammunition, and Defense Articles (ATF6 permit)) is being revised due to minor material changes to the form, such as formatting and an additional sub question.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/20/2022-22756/agency-information-collection-activities-proposed-ecollection-ecomments-requested-revision-of-a?utm_source=federalregister.gov&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=subscription+mailing+list

 

*******

 

October 20, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 63799: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), Department of Justice (DOJ) submitted the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection (IC) OMB 1140-0011 (Application to Make and Register a Firearm—ATF Form 1 (5320.1) is being revised to include changes due to formatting, additional definitions, updates to the instructions, and additional sub-questions required to comply with the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/20/2022-22754/agency-information-collection-activities-proposed-ecollection-of-ecomments-requested-revision-of-a?utm_source=federalregister.gov&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=subscription+mailing+list

 

*******

 

October 20, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 63801: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), Department of Justice (DOJ), submitted the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed collection OMB 1140-0055 (Identification of Explosive Materials) is being revised due to a reduction in the number of respondents, the total responses, and public burden hours associated with this IC, since the last renewal in 2019.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/20/2022-22753/agency-information-collection-activities-proposed-ecollection-ecomments-requested-revision-of-a?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=subscription+mailing+list&utm_source=federalregister.gov

 

*******

 

 

 

U.S. Congress

 

The House Proposes Moving The Department of Commerce Responsibilities To The Department of Defense

 

October 28, 2022: U.S. Congressmen Jim Banks, Robert Wittman, and Greg Steube introduced HR. 9241 proposing “Prioritizing National Security in Export Controls Act of 2022” to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and to the Committees on Armed Services, and Appropriations, for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committees.

 

The proposed Bill seeks the transfer of export control authorities from the Department of Commerce to the Department of Defense. The proposed Bill states, “It is the sense of Congress that export control authority should be taken away from the Bureau of Industry and Security of the Department of Commerce since the Bureau has manifestly been unable to resolve the conflict of interest between promoting trade and protecting United States national security through enforcing restrictions on technology transfer to high-risk countries, especially China.” The proposed Bill also seeks to restrict individuals employed in a Senior Executive Service position related to export control in the Department of Commerce, including the Bureau of Industry and Security, from transferring from such position to a position in the Defense Technology and Security Administration of the Department of Defense.

 

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/117/hr9241/text?utm_source=sfmc&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=&utm_term=China+Center+Update+10.31.22&utm_content=10/31/2022

 

******

 

U.S. Defense Industry News

 

U.S. Next Generation Fighter To Be Developed Independently In U.S.

 

October 3, 2022: Unlike the F-35 program, which saw three US military branches and a handful of international partners involved in its creation, the US Air Force’s next-generation fighter will be developed independently, with many of its key attributes kept secret. However, Air Force officials have hinted there may be opportunities for the US and its allies to co-develop technologies that could be “associated” with future tactical aircraft — specifically the Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) drones that will operate alongside the Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) manned fighter, as well as the mission systems inside the fighter itself.

 

https://breakingdefense.com/2022/10/on-next-generation-air-dominance-program-us-eyes-cooperation-with-allies/

 

*******

 

L3Harris Technologies Agreed To Buy Viasat’s Tactical Data Link Business

 

October 3, 2022: L3Harris Technologies agreed to buy Viasat’s tactical data link business for roughly $1.96 billion, a move officials with the defense and IT company say will extend its reach into the Pentagon’s ambitious communications overhaul known as Joint All-Domain Command and Control. The prospective acquisition consists of Link 16 Multifunctional Information Distribution System platforms, their associated terminals, which are installed in tens of thousands of U.S. and allied systems worldwide, and space assets.

 

https://www.defensenews.com/battlefield-tech/it-networks/2022/10/03/l3harris-to-buy-viasats-link-16-portfolio-expand-jadc2-offerings/

LATEST SANCTIONS FINES & PENALTIES

 

This section of our newsletter provides information on the latest sanctions, fines and penalties for export violations or matters of non-compliance with the ITAR or EAR issued by the US government enforcement agencies. It is provided as a service to exporters and associates of FD Associates to remind them of the importance of extreme due diligence in all international trade and export compliance matters, particularly those involving exports subject to the ITAR or the EAR. Don't let this happen to you or your company! Call us with questions or concerns at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net.

 

Sanctions

 

Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC), Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) and the Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

 

October 14, 2022: The Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC), Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), and the Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued a joint statement on the impact of Sanctions and Export Controls on Russia and a summary of the actions they have taken. Since Russia’s unjustified and unprovoked invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the United States has worked with allies and partners around the world to impose costs on Russia for its war of aggression. DDTC, BIS, and OFAC issued this joint alert to inform the public of the impact of sanctions and export control restrictions targeting Russia’s defense capabilities and warn of the risks of supporting Russia’s military-industrial complex.

 

See the following link for a copy of the statement:

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/20221014_russia_alert.pdf

 

*******

 

Department of State, Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation, State Department.

 

October 14, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 625484: The Department of State, Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation, State Department has applied Section 3 of the Iran, North Korea, and Syria Nonproliferation Act against the following entities:

 

  • Beijing J&A Industry & Trade Co. Ltd. (People's Republic of China (PRC); and any successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary thereof;
  • Linda Zhai (PRC individual);
  • Synnat Pharma Pvt Ltd (India) and any successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary thereof; and
  • OTOBOT Project Group (Turkey) and any successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary thereof.

 

Accordingly, pursuant to Section 3 of the Act, the following measures are imposed on these persons:

 

  1. No department or agency of the U.S. government may procure or enter into any contract for the procurement of any goods, technology, or services from these foreign persons, except to the extent that the Secretary of State otherwise may determine;

 

  1. No department or agency of the U.S. government may provide any assistance to these foreign persons, and these persons shall not be eligible to participate in any assistance program of the U.S. government, except to the extent that the Secretary of State otherwise may determine;

 

  1. No U.S. government sales to these foreign persons of any item on the United States Munitions List are permitted, and all sales to these persons of any defense articles, defense services, or design and construction services under the Arms Export Control Act are terminated; and

 

  1. No new individual licenses shall be granted for the transfer to these foreign persons of items the export of which is controlled under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 or the Export Administration Regulations, and any existing such licenses are suspended.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/14/2022-22347/imposition-of-nonproliferation-measures-against-foreign-persons-including-a-ban-on-united-states

 

*******

 

Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

 

October 4, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 60064: In response to the Russian Federation's (Russia's) further invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, the illegal and unjustifiable basis of which has been furthered by its illegal purported annexation of regions of Ukraine, the Department of Commerce amended the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by adding 57 entities under 57 entries to the Entity List. These entities have been determined by the U.S. Government to be acting contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States. Of these 57 entities, 56 will be listed on the Entity List under the destination of Russia and one will be listed under the destination of the Crimea Region of Ukraine.

 

Crimea Region of Ukraine:

 

  • Subsidiary Sevastopol Naval Plant of Zvezdochka Shipyard.

 

Russia:

  • A. Lyulki Experimental-Design Bureau;
  • A. Lyulki Science and Technology Center;
  • AO Aviaagregat;
  • Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute;
  • Closed Joint Stock Company Turborus;
  • Federal Autonomous Institution Central Institute of Engine-Building N.A. P.I. Baranov;
  • Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science P.I. K.A. Valiev RAS of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russia;
  • Federal State Budgetary Institution National Research Center Institute n.a. NE Zhukovsky;
  • Federal State Unitary Enterprise All-Russian Research Institute of Physical, Technical and Radio Engineering Measurements;
  • Federal State Unitary Enterprise State Scientific-Research Institute for Aviation Systems;
  • Federal Technical Regulation and Metrology Agency;
  • Institute of Physics Named After P.N. Lebedev of the Russian Academy of Sciences;
  • Institute of Solid-State Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences;
  • Joint Stock Company 121 Aviation Repair Plant;
  • Joint Stock Company 123 Aviation Repair Plant;
  • Joint Stock Company 218 Aviation Repair Plant;
  • Joint Stock Company 360 Aviation Repair Plant;
  • Joint Stock Company 514 Aviation Repair Plant;
  • Joint Stock Company 766 UPTK;
  • Joint Stock Company Aramil Aviation Repair Plant;
  • Joint Stock Company Aviaremont;
  • Joint Stock Company Flight Research Institute N.A. M.M. Gromov;
  • Joint Stock Company Metallist Samara;
  • Joint Stock Company Moscow Machinebuilding Enterprise named after V.V. Chernyshev;
  • Joint Stock Company NII Steel;
  • Joint Stock Company Remdizel;
  • Joint Stock Company Special Industrial and Technical Base Zvezdochka;
  • Joint Stock Company STAR;
  • Joint Stock Company Votkinsk Machine Building Plant;
  • Joint Stock Company Yaroslavl Radio Factory;
  • Joint Stock Company Zlatoustovsky Machine Building Plant;
  • Limited Liability Company Center for Specialized Production OSK Propulsion;
  • Lytkarino Machine-Building Plant;
  • Moscow Aviation Institute;
  • Moscow Institute of Thermal Technology;
  • National Research Center Kurchatov Institute;
  • Omsk Motor-Manufacturing Design Bureau;
  • Open Joint Stock Company 20 Aviation Repair Plant;
  • Open Joint Stock Company 32 Repair Plant of Flight Support Equipment;
  • Open Joint Stock Company 170 Flight Support Equipment Repair Plant;
  • Open Joint Stock Company 275 Aviation Repair Plant;
  • Open Joint Stock Company 308 Aviation Repair Plant;
  • Open Joint Stock Company 322 Aviation Repair Plant;
  • Open Joint Stock Company 325 Aviation Repair Plant;
  • Open Joint Stock Company 680 Aircraft Repair Plant;
  • Open Joint Stock Company 720 Special Flight Support Equipment Repair Plant;
  • Open Joint Stock Company Volgograd Radio-Technical Equipment Plant;
  • Public Joint Stock Company Agregat;
  • Russian Institute of Radio Navigation and Time;
  • Rzhanov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences;
  • Salute Gas Turbine Research and Production Center;
  • Scientific-Production Association Vint of Zvezdochka Shipyard;
  • Scientific Research Institute of Applied Acoustics;
  • Siberian Scientific-Research Institute of Aviation N.A. S.A. Chaplygin;
  • Software Research Institute, and
  • Tula Arms Plant.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/04/2022-21520/additions-of-entities-to-the-entity-list

 

*******

 

October 20, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 63760: The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued an Order renewing the Temporary Denial Order that it issued against Russian airline Avistar TU on April 21, 2022. The Office of Export Enforcement based its request for renewal upon the facts underlying the issuance of the initial TDO and the evidence developed over the course of this investigation, which indicate a blatant disregard for U.S. export controls, as well as the TDO. Specifically, the initial TDO, issued on April 21, 2022, was based on evidence that Aviastar engaged in conduct prohibited by the Regulations by operating multiple aircraft subject to the EAR and classified under ECCN 9A991.b on flights into Russia after March 2, 2022, from destinations including Hangzhou, China, Shenzhen, China, and Zhengzhou, China, without the required BIS authorization.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/20/2022-22815/aviastar-tu-5-b-7-leningradsky-prospekt-g-moskva-125040-moscow-russia-order-renewing-temporary

 

*******

 

Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

 

October 3, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated two individuals and one business entity in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14033. These designations follow OFAC’s September 26, 2022, designation of a corrupt state prosecutor in BiH and build on other recent sanctions imposed on individuals and entities in the region. Collectively, these actions underscore the United States’ willingness to hold accountable those enabling divisive and destabilizing activities in the Western Balkans.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Novalic, Fadil of Bosnia and Herzegovina; and
  • Stankovic, Slobodan of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

 

The following entity has been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Integral Inzenjering A.D. Laktasi of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0985 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221003

 

*******

 

October 6, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)  designated seven senior leaders within Iran’s government and security apparatus for the shutdown of Iran’s Internet access and the continued violence against peaceful protesters in the wake of the tragic death of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini, who was arrested for allegedly wearing a hijab improperly, and died in the custody of Iran’s Morality Police. This action follows OFAC’s September 22 designation of Iran’s Morality Police, its senior leadership, and other senior leaders of Iran’s security organizations. Together with the release of Iran General License D-2, which authorizes exports of additional tools to assist Iranians in accessing the Internet, these designations demonstrate the United States’ commitment to free, peaceful assembly and open communication. The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) also designated three individuals and one entity connected to Burma’s military regime pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14014. Following the February 1, 2021, coup that overthrew Burma’s democratically elected civilian government, the military has committed numerous atrocities against people in Burma, including the violent repression of political dissent, the killing of over 2,300 innocent civilians, and displacement of more than 900,000 people.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Javani, Yadollah of Iran;
  • Majid, Vahid Mohammad Naser of Iran;
  • Nejat, Hossein of Iran;
  • Rahimi, Hossein of Iran;
  • Sajedinia, Hossein of Iran;
  • Zarepour, Eisa of Iran;
  • Myint, Aung Moe of Burma;
  • Myint, Hlaing Moe of Burma; and
  • Thitsar, Myo of Burma.

 

The following entity has been added to OFAC's SDN List

 

  • Dynasty International Company Limited of Burma.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0994 and https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0996 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221006

 

*******

 

October 7, 2022:  The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated two individuals and three entities for activities related to the exportation of petroleum to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), which directly supports the development of DPRK weapons programs and its military. This action highlights the U.S. Government’s commitment to implement existing United Nations Security Council resolutions (UNSCRs), including holding the DPRK accountable for its use of illicit ship-to-ship (STS) transfers to circumvent UN sanctions that restrict the import of petroleum products and supports the development of its weapons programs and military.

 

OFAC also designated Malaysian national Teo Boon Ching, the Teo Boon Ching Wildlife Trafficking Transnational Criminal Organization (TCO), and the Malaysian company Sunrise Greenland Sdn. Bhd. for the cruel trafficking of endangered and threatened wildlife and the products of brutal poaching. Teo Boon Ching specializes in the transportation of rhino horn, ivory, and pangolins from Africa, generally utilizing routes through Malaysia and Laos and onward to consumers in Vietnam and China.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Chen, Shih Huan of Taiwan;
  • Ching, Teo Boon of Malaysia; and
  • Kwek, Kee Seng of Singapore.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Anfasar Trading S PTE. LTD. of Singapore;
  • New Eastern Shipping Co LTD of Singapore and China;
  • Sunrise Greenland SDN. BHD of Malaysia;
  • Swanseas Port Services PTE. LTD. of Signapore; and
  • Teo Boon Ching Wildlife Trafficking Transnational Criminal Organization of Malaysia, Thailand, Laos, Vietnam, China and Hong Kong.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221007 and https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1000 and https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1001

 

*******

October 14, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) published the following new Russia Frequently Asked Questions:

 

Question 1092: Do non-U.S. companies risk exposure to sanctions for providing ammunition or other military goods to Russia or for supporting Russia’s military-industrial complex? 

 

Answer: Yes.  Multiple Russia-related sanctions authorities authorize sanctions against non-U.S. persons that provide goods, services, or other support for Russia’s military-industrial complex.  For example, OFAC may block any person determined to operate or have operated in the defense and related materiel sector of the Russian Federation economy pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 of April 15, 2021, “Blocking Property With Respect To Specified Harmful Foreign Activities of the Government of the Russian Federation.”  In addition, pursuant to E.O. 14024, OFAC may block persons determined to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for or goods or services to or in support of certain sanctionable activities enumerated in E.O. 14024 or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to E.O. 14024.  OFAC also has robust targeting authorities pursuant to the Ukraine-/Russia-Related Sanctions Regulations (URSR), 31 C.F.R. part 589, which implement multiple authorities that could provide for the blocking of persons who engage in the provision of ammunition or other military goods to the Russian Federation, including persons determined to operate or have operated in the arms or related materiel sector of the Russian Federation economy, or those who have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of persons blocked pursuant to the URSR.

 

OFAC is prepared to use its broad targeting authorities against non-U.S. persons that provide ammunition or other support to the Russian Federation’s military-industrial complex, as well as private military companies (PMCs) or paramilitary groups participating in or otherwise supporting the Russian Federation’s unlawful and unjustified attack on Ukraine.  OFAC will continue to target Russia’s efforts to resupply its weapons and sustain its war of aggression against Ukraine, including any foreign persons who assist the Russian Federation in those efforts.

 

OFAC and the Department of State have imposed numerous targeted sanctions on the Russian Federation’s military-industrial complex, including on State Corporation Rostec, the cornerstone of Russia’s defense-industrial base, and multiple other key firms.  In addition, the Department of State has identified persons that are part of, or operate for or on behalf of, the defense and intelligence sectors of the Government of the Russian Federation pursuant to Section 231 of the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA) (CAATSA 231 List of Specified Persons).  Persons determined to knowingly engage in a significant transaction with those identified on the CAATSA 231 List of Specified Persons are subject to five or more sanctions described in Section 235 of CAATSA.  The Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has also imposed highly restrictive controls on the export and reexport of U.S.-origin and certain foreign-produced commodities, software, and technologies to the Russian Federation to cut off its access to inputs and products needed to sustain its military capabilities.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/1092

 

*******

 

October 13, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) published one sectoral determination issued pursuant to an April 15, 2021, Executive order, as well as a category of services determination issued pursuant to an April 6, 2022, Executive order. Each determination was previously issued on OFAC's website. On April 15, 2021, the President, invoking the authority of, inter alia, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), issued Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 (86 FR 20249, April 19, 2022). Among other prohibitions, section 1(a) of E.O. 14024 blocks, with certain exceptions, all property and interests in property that are in the United States, that come within the United States, or that are or come within the possession or control of any U.S. person of, any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State: (i) to operate or have operated in the technology sector or the defense and related materiel sector of the Russian Federation economy, or any other sector of the Russian Federation economy as may be determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State. On April 6, 2022, the President, invoking the authority of, inter alia, IEEPA, issued E.O. 14071 of April 6, 2022, “Prohibiting New Investment in and Certain Services to the Russian Federation in Response to Continued Russian Federation Aggression” (87 FR 20999, April 8, 2022). Among other prohibitions, section 1(a)(ii) of E.O. 14071 prohibits the exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, from the United States, or by a United States person, wherever located, of any category of services as may be determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, to any person located in the Russian Federation. On September 15, 2022, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director of OFAC, in consultation with the Department of State, issued a sectoral determination pursuant to E.O. 14024. This determination took effect upon publication on OFAC's website, which occurred on September 15, 2022. Also, on September 15, 2022, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director of OFAC, in consultation with the Department of State, issued a category of services determination pursuant to E.O. 14071.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/13/2022-22162/publication-of-russian-harmful-foreign-activities-sanctions-regulations-determinations

 

*******

 

October 13, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) published the following General licenses:

 

General License D-2 (87 Fed. Reg. 62003):

 

General License With Respect to Certain Services, Software, and Hardware Incident to Communications

(a) To the extent that such transactions are not exempt from the prohibitions of the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 560 (ITSR), and subject to the restrictions set forth in paragraph (b), the following transactions are authorized:

(1) Fee-based or no-cost services. The exportation or reexportation, directly or indirectly, from the United States or by a U.S. person, wherever located, to Iran of fee-based or no-cost services incident to the exchange of communications over the internet, such as instant messaging, chat and email, social networking, sharing of photos and movies, web browsing, blogging, social media platforms, collaboration platforms, video conferencing, e-gaming, e-learning platforms, automated translation, web maps, and user authentication services, as well as cloud-based services in support of the foregoing or of any other transaction, authorized or exempt under the ITSR.

(2) Fee-based or no-cost software. (i) Software subject to the EAR. The exportation, reexportation, or provision, directly or indirectly, to Iran of fee-based or no-cost software subject to the Export Administration Regulations, 15 CFR parts 730 through 774 (EAR), that is incident to, or enables services incident to, the exchange of communications over the internet, such as instant messaging, chat and email, social networking, sharing of photos and movies, web browsing, blogging, social media platforms, collaboration platforms, video conferencing, e-gaming, e-learning platforms, automated translation, web maps, and user authentication services, as well as cloud-based services in support of the foregoing or of any other transaction authorized or exempt under the ITSR, provided that such software is designated EAR99 or classified by the U.S. Department of Commerce on the Commerce Control List, 15 CFR part 774, supplement No. 1 (CCL), under export control classification number (ECCN) 5D992.c.

(ii) Software that is not subject to the EAR because it is of foreign origin and is located outside the United States. The exportation, reexportation, or provision, directly or indirectly, by a U.S. person, wherever located, to Iran of fee-based or no-cost software that is not subject to the EAR because it is of foreign origin and is located outside the United States, that is incident to, or enables services incident to, the exchange of communications over the internet, such as instant messaging, chat and email, social networking, sharing of photos and movies, web browsing, blogging, social media platforms, collaboration platforms, video conferencing, e-gaming, e-learning platforms, automated translation, web maps, and user authentication services, as well as cloud-based services in support of the foregoing or of any other transaction authorized or exempt under the ITSR, provided that such software would be designated EAR99 if it were located in the United States or would meet the criteria for classification under ECCN 5D992.c if it were subject to the EAR.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/13/2022-22233/publication-of-iranian-transactions-and-sanctions-regulations-web-general-license-d-2

 

General License 13B (87 Fed. Reg. 62005):

 

Authorizing Certain Administrative Transactions Prohibited by Directive 4 Under Executive Order 14024

 

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this general license, U.S. persons or entities owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a U.S. person are authorized to pay taxes, fees, or import duties, and purchase or receive permits, licenses, registrations, or certifications, to the extent such transactions are prohibited by Directive 4 under Executive Order (E.O.) 14024, Prohibitions Related to Transactions Involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, provided such transactions are ordinarily incident and necessary to the day-to-day operations in the Russian Federation of such U.S. persons or entities, through 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time, December 7, 2022.

 

(b) This general license does not authorize:

(1) Any debit to an account on the books of a U.S. financial institution of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, or the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation; or

(2) Any transactions otherwise prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR), including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the RuHSR, unless separately authorized.

(c) Effective September 8, 2022, General License No. 13A, dated May 25, 2022, is replaced and superseded in its entirety by this General License No. 13B.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/13/2022-22236/publication-of-russian-harmful-foreign-activities-sanctions-regulations-web-general-license-13b

 

General License 3 (87 Fed. Reg. 62005):

 

Authorizing Transactions Related to, Provision of Financing for, and Other Dealings in Certain Bonds.

 

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this general license, all transactions related to, the provision of financing for, and other dealings in bonds specified in the Annex to this general license that would be prohibited by Subsection l(a)(iii) of Executive Order of August 24, 2017, “Imposing Additional Sanctions with Respect to the Situation in Venezuela,” are authorized.

(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this general license, all transactions related to, the provision of financing for, and other dealings in bonds that were issued both (i) prior to the effective date of Executive Order of August 24, 2017, and (ii) by U.S. person entities owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by the Government of Venezuela, are authorized.

(c) This general license does not authorize any transaction that is otherwise prohibited by Executive Order of August 24, 2017, Executive Order 13692 of March 8, 2015, or any part of 31 CFR chapter V.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/13/2022-22198/publication-of-venezuela-sanctions-regulations-web-general-license-3-and-subsequent-iterations

 

General License 9 (87 Fed. Reg. 62020):

 

Authorizing Transactions Related to Dealings in Certain Debt.

 

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this general license, all transactions and activities prohibited by Section 1(a)(iii) of Executive Order 13808 (E.O. 13808) or Executive Order 13850 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to dealings in any debt (including the bonds listed on the Annex to this general license, promissory notes, and other receivables) of Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PdVSA) or any entity in which PdVSA owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest (together, PdVSA-related debt), issued prior to August 25, 2017 (the effective date of E.O. 13808), are authorized, provided that any divestment or transfer of, or facilitation of divestment or transfer of, any holdings in such debt must be to a non-U.S. person.

 

(b) The transactions and activities authorized in paragraph (a) include facilitating, clearing, and settling transactions to divest to a non-U.S. person PdVSA-related debt, including on behalf of U.S. persons.

 

(c) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this general license, all transactions and activities prohibited by Section 1(a)(iii) of E.O. 13808 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to dealings in any bonds that were issued prior to August 25, 2017 (the effective date of E.O. 13808) by the following entities or any of their subsidiaries, are authorized:

  • PDV Holdings, Inc.
  • CITGO Holdings, Inc.
  • Nynas AB

 

(d) This general license does not authorize:

(1) The unblocking of any property blocked pursuant to any part of 31 CFR chapter V, except as authorized by paragraph (a);

(2) U.S. persons to sell PdVSA-related debt to, to purchase or invest in the debt of, or to facilitate such transactions with, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to E.O. 13850, including PdVSA and any entity in which PdVSA owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest, other than purchases of or investments in PdVSA-related debt (including settlement of purchases or sales that were pending on January 28, 2019) that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the divestment or transfer of PdVSA-related debt;

(3) Any transaction that is otherwise prohibited under Executive Order 13850 of November 1, 2018, Executive Order 13835 of May 21, 2018, Executive Order 13827 of March 19, 2018, Executive Order 13808 of August 24, 2017, Executive Order 13692 of March 8, 2015, or any part of 31 CFR chapter V, or any transactions or dealings with any blocked person other than the transactions described in paragraph (a) of this general license.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/10/13/2022-22197/publication-of-venezuela-sanctions-regulations-web-general-license-9-and-subsequent-iterations

 

*******

 

October 17, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is issuing Russia-related General License 28A.

 

General License 28A: Authorizing Certain Transactions Involving Public Joint Stock Company Transkapitalbank and Afghanistan. All transactions involving Public Joint Stock Company Transkapitalbank (TKB), or any entity in which TKB owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest, that are ultimately destined for or originating from Afghanistan and prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time, January 18, 2023.

 

U.S. financial institutions are authorized to operate correspondent accounts on behalf of TKB, or any entity in which TKB owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest, provided such accounts are used solely to effect transactions authorized above.

 

This general license does not authorize:

(1) Any transactions prohibited by Directive 2 under E.O. 14024, Prohibitions Related to Correspondent or Payable-Through Accounts and Processing of Transactions Involving Certain Foreign Financial Institutions;

(2) Any transactions prohibited by Directive 4 under E.O. 14024, Prohibitions Related to Transactions Involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation; or

(3) Any transactions otherwise prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR), including involving any person blocked pursuant to the RuHSR other than the blocked persons described in paragraph (a) of this general license, unless separately authorized.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl28a.pdf

 

In addition, OFAC has updated the following lists:

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals List:

 

  • Adale, Khalif of Somlia and Djibouti;
  • Aden, Mohamoud Abdi of Somalia and Kenya;
  • Afgooye, Hassan of Somalia;
  • Ato, Mustaf of Somalia;
  • Badaas, Mohamed Ali of Yemen;
  • Gagaale, Abdikarim Hussein of Somalia;
  • Jeeri, Abdullahi of Somalia;
  • Jiis, Yasir of Somalia;
  • Mataan, Ahmed Hasan Ali Sulaiman of Yemen;
  • Mire, Mohamed, Jilib of Somalia;
  • Nurey, Abdirahman of Somalia;
  • Nurow, Yusuf Ahmed Hajji of Somalia;
  • Salad, Mohamed Hussein, Al Mukalla of Yemen; and
  • Samad, Abdi of Somalia.

 

The following deletions have been made to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Micallef, Terence of Malta.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221017

 

*******

 

October 19, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated Juan Francisco Valenzuela Valenzuela and the Valenzuela Drug Trafficking Organization (“Valenzuela DTO”), among others, pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14059. Originally established as a transportation cell, the Valenzuela DTO evolved into a sophisticated network that became invaluable to Sinaloa Cartel leadership. Named after the family who facilitated its rise to prominence, the Valenzuela DTO was run by siblings Jorge Alberto, Wuendi Yuridia, and Juan Francisco Valenzuela Valenzuela in recent years. Following the arrests of Jorge Alberto and Wuendi Yuridia by U.S. authorities in October 2020 and November 2021, respectively, Juan Francisco Valenzuela Valenzuela is the last remaining sibling involved in the Valenzuela DTO’s operations in Mexico. Operating under the umbrella of the Sinaloa Cartel, the Valenzuela DTO is involved in the importation and transport of multi-ton quantities of illicit drugs, including methamphetamine, heroin, and fentanyl, from Mexico to the United States.

 

The following Individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Araujo Peralta of Mexico;
  • Rivas Chaires of Mexico; and
  • Valenzuela Valenzuela of Mexico.


The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • ARFEL Transportadora Cool Logistic, S.A. DE C.V. of Mexico;
  • Servicios De Transporte Maruha, Sociedad Anonima De Capital Variable of Mexico;
  • Transportes Refrigerados Pandas Trucking, Sociedad Anonima De Capital Variable of Mexico; and
  • Valenzuela Drug Trafficking Organization of Mexico.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221019 and https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1034

 

*******

 

October 19, 2022: In coordination with the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated a Russian network that procured military and sensitive dual-use technologies from U.S. manufacturers and supplied them to Russian end-users.

 

Those designated are Russian national and procurement agent Yury Yuryevich Orekhov (Orekhov) and two of his companies, Nord-Deutsche Industrieanlagenbau GmbH (NDA GmbH) and Opus Energy Trading LLC (Opus Energy Trading). These designations highlight the U.S. government’s continuing efforts to hinder Russia’s ability to wage its war of aggression in Ukraine, including by holding accountable those who support Russia’s military by disrupting its illicit defense and technology procurement networks around the world.

 

The following individual has been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

OREKHOV, Yury Yuryevichof the United Arab Emirates, Kazakhstan, and Russia.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Nda Nord-Deutsche Industrieanlagenbau GMBH of Germany; and
  • Opus Energy Trading LLC of the United Arab Emirates.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1035 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221019_33

 

*******

 

October 24, 2022:  The U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated the Nicaraguan mining authority General Directorate of Mines (DGM) as well as one official of the Government of Nicaragua, pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13851.

 

Additionally, President Biden signed a new E.O. that amends E.O. 13851 and expands the Treasury’s authority to hold the Ortega-Murillo regime accountable for its continued attacks on Nicaraguans’ freedom of expression and assembly. Furthermore, the new E.O. gives Treasury the authority to target certain persons that operate or have operated in the gold sector of the Nicaraguan economy, and any other sector identified by the Secretary of the Treasury in consultation with the Secretary of State. The new E.O. also provides expanded sanctions authorities that could be used to prohibit new U.S. investment in certain identified sectors in Nicaragua, the importation of certain products of Nicaraguan origin into the United States, or the exportation from the United States, or by a United States person, wherever located, of certain items to Nicaragua.

 

The following names have been added to OFAC's list of Specially Designated Nationals:

 

  • Cerna Juarez, Reinaldo Gregorio Lenin of Nicaragua.

 

The following entity has been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • General Directorate Of Mines of Nicaragua.

 

Nicaragua General License 4: All transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind-down of any transaction involving the Directorate General of Mines (DGM) of the Nicaraguan Ministry of Energy and Mines, or any entity in which DGM owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest that are prohibited by the Nicaragua Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 582 (NSR), are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time, November 23, 2022, provided that any payment to a blocked person must be made into a blocked account in accordance with the NSR. This general license does not authorize any transactions otherwise prohibited by the NSR, including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the NSR, other than the blocked persons described in paragraph (a) of this general license, unless separately authorized.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1046 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221024 and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/14088.pdf and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/nicaragua_gl4.pdf and

 

OFAC issued the following Nicaragua Sanctions related to Frequently Asked Questions:

 

Question 1093: What does Nicaragua General License (GL) 4 authorize?

 

Answer: Nicaragua GL 4  authorizes U.S. persons to engage in transactions prohibited by the Nicaragua Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 582 (the NSR), that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind-down of any transaction involving the Directorate General of Mines (DGM) of the Nicaraguan Ministry of Energy and Mines, or any entity in which DGM owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest (collectively, “Blocked DGM Entities”), through 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time, November 23, 2022, provided that any payment to a blocked person must be made into a blocked account in accordance with the NSR.

 

After the expiration of this authorization, unless exempt or authorized by the Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. persons will be prohibited from engaging in transactions with the Blocked DGM Entities and must block property or interests in property of any Blocked DGM Entities that are in, or thereafter come within, the United States, or the possession or control of a U.S. person.

 

Non-U.S. persons generally do not risk exposure to U.S. blocking sanctions under the NSR for engaging in transactions with blocked persons where those transactions would not require a specific license if engaged in by a U.S. person.

 

*******

 

October 26, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated 10 Iranian officials for the brutal ongoing crackdown on nationwide protests in Iran, as well as two Iranian intelligence actors and two Iranian entities involved in the Iranian government’s efforts to disrupt digital freedom. This action comes 40 days after 22-year-old Mahsa Amini’s arrest and death in the custody of Iran’s Morality Police and the ongoing brutal crackdown on peaceful protests in Iran and follows OFAC designations on September 22 and October 6, 2022, which targeted key Iranian organizations and officials involved in the Iranian regime’s ongoing repression and its denial of the fundamental freedoms and universal rights of its citizens. These sanctions, coupled with additional initiatives such as the release of Iran General License D-2, which expands and clarifies the range of U.S. software and internet services available to Iranians under OFAC’s sanctions program, demonstrate the United States’ commitment to supporting the Iranian people’s call for accountability and justice, as well as their right to freely exchange information, including online.

 

OFAC also took action to counter the Government of the Russian Federation’s (GoR) persistent malign influence campaigns and systemic corruption in Moldova by imposing sanctions on nine individuals and 12 entities. The individuals and entities sanctioned include oligarchs widely recognized for capturing and corrupting Moldova’s political and economic institutions and those acting as instruments of Russia’s global influence campaign, which seeks to manipulate the United States and its allies and partners, including Moldova and Ukraine. The designations include former Moldovan government official Vladimir Plahotniuc, who engaged in state capture by exerting control over and manipulating key sectors of Moldova’s government, including the law enforcement, electoral, and judicial sectors.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Al-Ghaib, Seyyed Heshmatollah Hayat of Iran;
  • Chayka, Igor Yuryevich of Russia;
  • Farzadi, Hedayat of Iran;
  • Fathi, Murad of Iran;
  • Gonin, Leonid Mikhailovich of Russia;
  • Grak, Olga Yurievna of Russia;
  • Gudilin, Yuriy Igorevich of Russia;
  • Karimi, Farzin of Iran;
  • Kazemi, Mohammad of Iran;
  • Khiabani, Hossein Modarres of Iran;
  • Khosravi, Mohammad Hossein of Iran;
  • Mirheydary, Mohammad Reza of Iran;
  • Mostafavi, Seyed Mojtaba of Iran;
  • Nilforushan, Abbas of Iran;
  • Ostad, Mohammad Reza of Iran;
  • Pasandideh, Heidar of Iran;
  • Piri, Morteza of Iran;
  • Plahotniuc, Vladimir of Cyprus, Romania and Maldova;
  • Shafahi, Ahmad of Iran;
  • Shor, Ilan Mironovich of Israel and Moldova;
  • Shor, Sara Lvovna or Russia;
  • Troshin, Aleksei Valeryevich or Russia;
  • Zavorotnyi, Ivan Aleksandrovich of Russia.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Aktsionernoe Obshchestvo Natsionalnaya Inzhiniringovaya Korporatsiya of Russia;
  • Bushehr Prison of Iran;
  • OOO Agro-Region of Russia;
  • OOO Aqua Solid of Russia;
  • OOO BM Proekt-Ekologiya of Russia;
  • OOO Ekogrupp of Russia;
  • OOO Innovatsii Sveta of Russia;
  • OOO Inzhiniring.RF of Russia;
  • OOO Khartiya of Russia;
  • OOO Kompaniya Zolotoi Vek of Russia;
  • OOO Mezhmunitsipalnoe ATP of Russia;
  • OOO Region-Comfort of Russia;
  • Ravin Academy of Iran;
  • Samane Gostar Sahab Pardaz Private Limited Company of Iran; and
  • Shor Party of Russia.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1048 and https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy1049 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221026

 

*******

 

October 28, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) took action against the 15 Khordad Foundation, an Iran-based foundation that has issued a multi-million-dollar bounty for the killing of prominent Indian-born, British-American author Salman Rushdie. Since Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini’s order pronouncing a death sentence on Rushdie in February 1989, 15 Khordad Foundation has committed millions of dollars to anyone willing to carry out this heinous act. Since putting its bounty on Rushdie, the 15 Khordad Foundation, which is affiliated with the Supreme Leader, has raised the reward for targeting the author.

 

The following entity has been added to OFAC's SDN List

 

  • 15 Khordad Foundation of Iran.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221028

 

*******

 

October 31, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing a Russia-related Frequently Asked Question (1094).

 

Question 1094: Is crude oil of Russian Federation origin that is loaded onto a vessel at the port of loading for maritime transport prior to December 5, 2022, subject to the price cap?  

 

Answer: No, provided the oil is unloaded at the port of destination prior to 12:01 a.m., eastern standard time, January 19, 2023.  Crude oil of Russian Federation origin that is loaded onto a vessel at the port of loading prior to 12:01 a.m., eastern standard time, December 5, 2022, and unloaded at the port of destination prior to 12:01 a.m., eastern standard time, January 19, 2023, is not subject to the price cap (also known as the “maritime services policy”).  U.S. service providers can continue to provide services related to the maritime transport of crude oil of Russian Federation origin purchased at a price above the price cap, provided that the crude oil is loaded onto a vessel at the port of loading for maritime transport prior to 12:01 a.m., eastern standard time, December 5, 2022, and unloaded at the port of destination prior to 12:01 a.m., eastern standard time, January 19, 2023.

The following is an example of a permissible transaction in line with the maritime service's policy:

  • A U.S. commodities trader signs a contract on November 1, 2022, to purchase crude oil of Russian Federation origin for shipment to a jurisdiction that has not prohibited the import of such crude oil.  The U.S. commodities trader arranges for the oil to be loaded onto a vessel at the port of loading.  The vessel is loaded on December 1, 2022, and a bill of lading is issued.  The oil is shipped and discharged at the port of destination on December 15, 2022.  U.S. insurance companies provide cover for this shipment/voyage and pay out any related claims, as appropriate.

 

As noted in OFAC’s preliminary guidance, OFAC anticipates implementing the maritime service's policy by publishing a determination pursuant to Executive Order 14071 that (i) permits the exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, from the United States or by a United States person, wherever located, of services related to the maritime transport of crude oil or petroleum products of Russian Federation origin, where the price of such crude oil or petroleum products of Russian Federation origin does not exceed the price cap and (ii) prohibits such services if the crude oil or petroleum products of Russian Federation origin are purchased above the price cap.  This determination would take effect at 12:01 a.m., eastern standard time, December 5, 2022, with respect to maritime transport of crude oil of Russian Federation origin loaded on or after 12:01 a.m., eastern standard time, December 5, 2022.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/1094

 

Fines and Penalties

 

October 11, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) settled with Bittrex, Inc., a private company based in Bellevue, Washington, that provides online virtual currency exchange and hosted wallet services.  Bittrex agreed to remit $24,280,829.20 to settle its potential civil liability for apparent violations of sanctions against Cuba, Ukraine-related, Iran, Sudan, and Syria.  As a result of deficiencies related to Bittrex's sanctions compliance procedures, Bittrex failed to prevent persons apparently located in the sanctioned jurisdictions from using its platform to engage in over $263,000,000 worth of virtual currency-related transactions.  Based on internet protocol ("IP") address information and physical address information collected about each customer at onboarding, Bittrex had reason to know that these users were located in jurisdictions subject to sanctions.  At the time of the transactions, however, Bittrex was not screening this customer information for terms associated with sanctioned jurisdictions.

 

The statutory maximum civil monetary penalty applicable in this matter is $35,773,364,108.57. OFAC determined that the Apparent Violations were not voluntarily self-disclosed and were non-egregious. Accordingly, under OFAC’s Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines (“Enforcement Guidelines”), the base civil monetary penalty amount applicable in this matter equals the applicable schedule amount, which is $485,616,584.00. The settlement amount of $24,280,829.20 reflects OFAC’s consideration of the General Factors under the Enforcement Guidelines.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221011 and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/20221011_bittrex.pdf

 

*******

 

October 11, 2022: A U.K. national, Graham Bonham-Carter, 62, was arrested for conspiracy to violate U.S. sanctions imposed on Russian Oligarch Oleg Vladimirovich Deripaska and wire fraud in connection with funding U.S. properties purchased by Deripaska and efforts to expatriate Deripaska’s artwork in the United States through misrepresentations. The U.S. government will seek his extradition to the United States. Deripaska was previously charged with U.S. sanctions violations in an indictment unsealed on Sept. 29.

 

On April 6, 2018, the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated Deripaska as a Specially Designated National (SDN), in connection with its finding that the actions of the Government of the Russian Federation with respect to Ukraine constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to U.S. national security and foreign policy (the OFAC Sanctions). According to the U.S. Treasury, Deripaska was sanctioned for having acted or purported to act on behalf of, directly or indirectly, a senior official of the Government of the Russian Federation and for operating in the energy sector of the Russian Federation economy.

According to court documents, Graham Bonham-Carter, 62, of the United Kingdom, worked for entities controlled by Deripaska from July 2003 through the present. Among other things, Bonham-Carter managed Deripaska’s residential properties located in the United Kingdom and Europe, including a house in Belgravia Square, London. Even after OFAC designated Deripaska, Bonham-Carter continued to work for Deripaska and referred to Deripaska as his “boss.” For example, in an email dated on or about June 18, 2018, Bonham-Carter wrote: “Times a bit tough for my boss as sanctions have hit him from the USA, so not an ideal time.” In an email dated on or about Oct. 13, 2021, Bonham-Carter wrote: “It[’]s all good apart from banks keep shutting me down because of my affiliation to my boss Oleg Deripaska.... I have even been advised not to go to the USA where Oleg still has personal sanctions as the authorities will undoubtedly pull me to one side, and the questioning could be hours or even days!!”

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/uk-businessman-graham-bonham-carter-indicted-sanctions-evasion-benefitting-russian-oligarch

 

*******

 

October 13, 2022: The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has issued an Order temporarily denying the export privileges of URAL Airlines JSC headquartered in Yekaterinburg, Russia. The Order is based on facts indicating that URAL engaged in conduct prohibited by the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by operating multiple aircraft subject to the EAR and classified under ECCN 9A991 on international flights, including from Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan; Dushanbe, Tajikistan; Khudzhand, Tajikistan and Tamchy, Kyrgyzstan to Russia after March 2, 2022, without the required BIS authorization.

 

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/export-violations-2022/1416-e2759/file

 

*******

 

October 17, 2022:  Intertech Trading Corporation, an Atkinson, New Hampshire-based laboratory equipment distributor, was sentenced in federal court after pleading guilty to 14 felony counts of failure to file export information on shipments to Russia and Ukraine, United States Attorney Jane E. Young announced. Judge Paul Barbadoro ordered that Intertech pay the maximum allowable fine of $10,000 per count, for a total of $140,000, and be subject to a two-year term of corporate probation and monitoring.

According to court documents and statements made in court, between 2015 and 2019, Intertech exported laboratory equipment to Russia, Ukraine, and elsewhere, falsely describing the nature and value of the exported items on commercial invoices and shipping forms. In its plea agreement, Intertech admitted that it used false, innocuous descriptions such as “lamp for aquarium” or “spares for welding system,” rather than accurately identifying the sophisticated scientific equipment actually contained in the shipments. Intertech admitted that it drastically undervalued the shipments, thereby evading the requirement to file Electronic Export Information, which would have been reported to the Departments of Commerce and Homeland Security.

 

https://www.justice.gov/usao-nh/pr/intertech-trading-corp-sentenced-pay-140000-14-felony-counts-failure-file-export

 

*******

 

October 18, 2022: A global building materials manufacturer and its subsidiary, Lafarge S.A., headquartered in Paris, France, and Lafarge Cement Syria (LCS) S.A., headquartered in Damascus, Syria, pleaded guilty to a one-count criminal information charging them with conspiring to provide material support and resources in Northern Syria from 2013 to 2014 to the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) and the al-Nusrah Front (ANF), both U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organizations. Immediately following the defendants’ guilty pleas this morning, the defendants were sentenced to terms of probation and to pay financial penalties, including criminal fines and forfeiture, totaling $77.78 million. According to court documents, Lafarge S.A. and Lafarge Cement Syria (LCS) S.A., schemed to pay ISIS and ANF in exchange for permission to operate a cement plant in Syria from 2013 to 2014, which enabled LCS to obtain approximately $70.3 million in revenue.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/lafarge-pleads-guilty-conspiring-provide-material-support-foreign-terrorist-organizations

 

*******

 

October 18, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has issued a Finding of Violation (FoV) to Nodus International Bank, Inc. (Nodus), an international financial entity located in Puerto Rico, for violations of the Venezuelan Sanctions Regulations (VSR) and the Reporting, Penalties, and Procedures Regulations (RPPR). The VSR violations related to Nodus’s voluntary self-disclosure of three unlicensed transactions in which an individual (the “blocked person”) on OFAC’s List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (the “SDN List”) had an interest. The RPPR violations reflected Nodus’s failure to maintain full and accurate records related to the handling of blocked property and its inaccurate reporting of the blocked property to OFAC. OFAC determined that the appropriate administrative action in this matter was an FoV in lieu of a civil monetary penalty. This action emphasizes that financial institutions should properly maintain blocked property and records, report such information accurately to OFAC, and obtain a specific license from OFAC in order to deal in blocked property.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/20221018_nodus.pdf and

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20221018

 

*******

 

October 19, 2022: In separate charges unsealed by the U.S. Attorney's Offices for the Eastern District of New York and the District of Connecticut, and with the support of the Department’s Task Force KleptoCapture, the Justice Department has charged nearly a dozen individuals and several corporate entities with participating in unlawful schemes to export powerful, civil-military, dual-use technologies to Russia some of which have been recovered on battlefields in Ukraine while another nuclear proliferation technology was intercepted before reaching Russian soil.

 

In the Eastern District of New York, five Russian nationals (Yury Orekhov, Artem Uss, Svetlana Kuzurgasheva, also known as “Lana Neumann,” Timofey Telegin, and Sergey Tulyakov) and two oil brokers (Juan Fernando Serrano Ponce, also known as “Juanfe Serrano” and Juan Carlos Soto) for Venezuela are charged in an indictment for their alleged participation in a global sanctions evasion and money laundering scheme. One defendant was arrested on Oct. 17 in Germany, and another defendant was arrested on Oct. 17 in Italy, both at the request of the United States. As alleged, the defendants obtained military technology from U.S. companies, smuggled millions of barrels of oil, and laundered tens of millions of dollars for Russian industrialists, sanctioned entities, and the world’s largest energy conglomerate.

 

Separately, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, a superseding indictment was unsealed charging four individuals, three of whom were arrested by Latvian authorities on Oct. 18 and one by Estonian authorities on June 13 at the request of the United States and two companies in Europe with violating U.S. export laws by attempting to smuggle a dual-use, export-controlled item – a high-precision computer-controlled grinding machine – to Russia. Commonly known as a “jig grinder,” the item is export-controlled for its use in nuclear proliferation and defense programs.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-charges-and-arrests-two-cases-involving-export-violation-schemes

 

*******

 

In three separate cases in the U.S. Attorney's Offices for the Eastern District of New York and the District of New Jersey, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has charged 13 individuals, including members of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) security and intelligence apparatus and their agents, for alleged efforts to unlawfully exert influence in the United States for the benefit of the government of the PRC.

 

A criminal complaint has been unsealed in federal court in Brooklyn, charging two People’s Republic of China (PRC) intelligence officers with attempting to obstruct a criminal prosecution in the Eastern District of New York. The defendants remain at large. According to court documents, Dong He, aka Guochun He and aka Jacky He, and Zheng Wang, aka Zen Wang, allegedly orchestrated a scheme to steal files and other information from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York related to the ongoing federal criminal investigation and prosecution of a global telecommunications company (Company-1) based in the PRC, including by paying a $41,000 Bitcoin bribe to a U.S. government employee who the defendants believed had been recruited to work for the PRC, but who in fact was a double agent working on behalf of the FBI.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1546421/download

 

A federal indictment has been unsealed charging four Chinese nationals, including three Ministry of State Security (MSS) intelligence officers, in connection with a long-running intelligence campaign targeting individuals in the United States to act as agents of the PRC. As alleged in the indictment, from at least 2008 to 2018, Wang Lin, 59; Bi Hongwei, age unknown; Dong Ting, aka Chelsea Dong, 40; Wang Qiang, 55, and others engaged in a wide-ranging and systematic effort to target and recruit individuals to act on behalf of the PRC in the United States with requests to provide information, materials, equipment, and assistance to the Chinese government in ways that would further China’s intelligence objectives. These recruitment efforts included targeting professors at universities, former federal law enforcement, and state homeland security official, and others to act on behalf of, and as agents of, the Chinese government. As part of the conspiracy, MSS intelligence officers Wang Lin, Dong Ting, and others used a purported academic institute at the Ocean University of China – referred to as the Institute for International Studies (IIS) – as cover for their clandestine intelligence activities. Acting undercover as the purported director of the IIS, Wang Lin, in coordination with other MSS operatives operating under the guise of academics at the IIS, targeted professors at American universities and others in the United States with access to sensitive information and equipment. According to the indictment unsealed, MSS intelligence officers Wang Lin, Bi, Dong, and others, acting for and on behalf of the MSS and the Chinese government, systematically targeted United States persons, including but not limited to a coconspirator who was a resident of the state of New Jersey and a second individual who was a former federal law enforcement officer and state homeland security official and a professor at an American university.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1546466/download and https://www.justice.gov/usao-nj/pr/chinese-intelligence-officers-charged-using-academic-cover-target-individuals-united

 

An eight-count indictment has been unsealed in Brooklyn charging a total of seven nationals of the PRC – Quanzhong An, 55, of Roslyn, New York; Guangyang An, 34, of Roslyn, New York; Tian Peng, 38, of the PRC; Chenghua Chen of the PRC; Chunde Ming of the PRC; Xuexin Hou, 52, of the PRC; and Weidong Yuan, 55, of the PRC – with participating in a scheme to cause the forced repatriation of a PRC national residing in the United States. The lead defendant, Quanzhong An, allegedly acted at the direction and under the control of various officials with the PRC’s government’s Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection (Provincial Commission) – including Peng, Chen, Ming, and Hou – to conduct surveillance of and engage in a campaign to harass and coerce a U.S. resident to return to the PRC as part of an international extralegal repatriation effort known as “Operation Fox Hunt.”

 

https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/press-release/file/1545641/download

 

 

OCTOBER 2022 EXPORT CONTROLS AND COMPLIANCE UPDATE Read More »

DDTC Announced Today A Temporary Suspension of the ITAR “See-Through Rule” For Certain High Energy Storage Capacitors Described on the USML

ITAR 120.11 (c)[1] pertains to the Order of Review and the Integration of controlled items described on the USML and states:

 

Defense articles described on the USML are controlled and remain subject to the ITAR following incorporation or integration into any item not described on the USML, unless specifically provided otherwise in this subchapter.

 

DDTC published the following announcement on their website as a notification to the Industry of temporary suspension of ITAR § 120.11(c) with respect to certain high energy storage capacitors

 

On November 21, 2022, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Defense Trade Controls temporarily suspended for a period of six (6) months the applicability of § 120.11(c) of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) for certain capacitors described in U.S. Munitions List (USML) Category XI(c)(5).

 

USML XI(c) (5) controls the following types of capacitors.

(5) High-energy storage capacitors with a repetition rate of 6 discharges or more per minute and full energy life greater than or equal to 10,000 discharges, at greater than 0.2 Amps per Joule peak current, that have any of the following:

(i) Volumetric energy density greater than or equal to 1.5 J/cc; or

(ii) Mass energy density greater than or equal to 1.3 kJ/kg;

 

 

The Department assessed that it is in the security and foreign policy interests of the United States to facilitate commercial uses of certain capacitors when integrated into any item not described on the USML (for example, certain items used in energy exploration and commercial aviation).

 

Accordingly, pursuant to ITAR § 126.2, and the Department’s administration of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA), the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Defense Trade Controls ordered the temporary suspension of ITAR § 120.11(c) with respect to capacitors described in USML Category XI(c)(5) that have a voltage rating of one hundred twenty-five volts (125 V) or less and have been integrated into, and included as an integral part of, any item not described on the USML. Such articles are licensed by the Department of Commerce when integrated into and included as an integral part of items subject to the EAR.

 

This temporary suspension is valid for a period of six months, from November 21, 2022, to May 21, 2023, or when terminated by notice, whichever occurs first.

Capacitors described in USML Category XI(c)(5) remain subject to the controls of the ITAR in all other circumstances, including as stand-alone articles. The export, reexport, retransfer, or temporary import of technical data and defense services directly related to all defense articles described in USML Category XI(c)(5) remain subject to the ITAR.

 

Any violation of the ITAR, including any violation of the terms and conditions of any export license issued by the Department of State prior to the temporary suspension announced herein, remains a violation of the AECA. The Department of State strongly encourages the industry to disclose unauthorized exports, reexports, retransfers, or temporary imports of defense articles, including the subject capacitors, that occurred prior to this temporary suspension.

 

Editors comments:

Industry has seen the ITAR See Through rule overcome before. It's important to follow DOS issuance of CJs and Consent Agreements to get insight into the regulators thinking on export controls of certain items.

 

Both Boeing and Goodrich incorporated the QRS-11 chip into commercial items, the 777 aircraft, and a flight standby instrument. DDTC awarded them both hefty civil penalties for this action, thus validating the ITAR See-Through Rule's existence before it was formally adopted into the ITAR in 2022. In the QRS-11 case, after the fines were assessed to Boeing and Goodrich, the regulators incorporated specific exceptions into the ITAR and EAR pertinent to when the QRS-11 chip is installed/integrated into a civil item.

 

One has to wonder the cause of this suspension and opine there may be a Commodity Jurisdiction Request in process or a compliance case that is causing the regulators to rethink controls for certain high-energy storage capacitors meeting the technical levels noted. Stay tuned for further updates...

 

This notice also serves as a reminder of the criticality of reviewing your Bill of Materials when manufacturing commercial items to ensure that you don't trip over the ITAR See-Through Rule.

 

DDTC Announced Today A Temporary Suspension of the ITAR “See-Through Rule” For Certain High Energy Storage Capacitors Described on the USML Read More »

SEPTEMBER 2022 EXPORT CONTROL REGULATION UPDATES

This newsletter is a listing of the latest changes in export control regulations through September 30, 2022.  The newsletter is provided as a complimentary service to assist exporters with their ITAR and EAR export compliance responsibilities. It provides a summary of recent changes to export control regulations or other regulatory matters of interest that may impact your company’s international trade and export compliance functions. Call us at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net with questions or comments.

 See also our “Latest Sanctions Fines & Penalties” section below for an update on companies and persons denied export privileges by the United States Government.

 

REGULATORY UPDATES

 

The President

 

President Biden Issues Executive Order Regarding Guidance On CIFIUS

 

September 15, 2022: President Biden issued an Executive Order (“EO”) on the interagency Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS” or the “Committee”) and guidance for ensuring robust national security reviews of foreign investment in the United States. The EO outlines five key factors that the Biden Administration is instructing the Committee to consider when conducting national security reviews of covered transactions:

  1. A transaction’s impact on U.S. supply chains. The EO directs CFIUS to consider how a proposed transaction could affect “the resilience of critical U.S. supply chains” and associated national security implications that could result from a shift in ownership, rights, or control to a foreign entity or person. The EO notes that this review should include sectors outside of the defense industrial base, including manufacturing capabilities, services, critical mineral resources, and technologies that could cause supply disruptions.
  2. A transaction’s effect on U.S. technological leadership in areas affecting U.S. national security. The EO instructs the Committee to take into consideration the protection of U.S. technological leadership in sectors that are critical to US national security, including microelectronics, artificial intelligence, biotechnology and biomanufacturing, quantum computing, advanced clean energy, and climate adaptation technologies. The EO acknowledges that foreign investment can aid domestic innovation but asks CFIUS to consider whether a transaction could result in technological or application advancements by foreign third parties that may undermine national security.
  3. Industry investment trends. The EO directs the Committee to view proposed transactions in the context of previous investments or past acquisitions—rather than in isolation. The EO identifies the need to focus on aggregate trends, such as incremental investments over time or the acquisition of cumulative control, in a sector or technology that may cede, part-by-part, domestic development or control (such as through multiple unrelated investments by the same party or country across the same industry).
  4. Cybersecurity risks. The EO states that CFIUS should consider whether a transaction could provide foreign investors or related third parties with the ability to conduct cyber intrusions or other malicious cyber-enabled activity that would pose serious national security risks.
  5. Risks to U.S. persons’ sensitive data. Notably, the EO highlights the risk of access to U.S. persons’ sensitive personal data among the key factors for the Committee’s consideration. The EO notes that tools like surveillance, tracing, tracking, and targeting of individuals combined with advances in technology and access to large data sets now allow data that was previously unidentifiable to become re‑identified or de-anonymized. At the direction of the EO, CFIUS will now apply greater consideration to whether a transaction could provide a foreign investor with the ability to exploit such information to the detriment of national security.

 

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/biden-administration-releases-5703369/ and https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2022/09/15/executive-order-on-ensuring-robust-consideration-of-evolving-national-security-risks-by-the-committee-on-foreign-investment-in-the-united-states/

 

*******

 

G7

 

G7 Members Confirmed Intention For A Price Cap On Russian Oil And Petroleum Products

 

September 2, 2022: At their summit in Elmau, G7 Leaders (which include the U.S.) reaffirmed a shared commitment to preventing Russia from profiting from its war of aggression, supporting stability in global energy markets, and to minimizing negative economic spillovers, especially on low and middle-income countries. To deliver on this commitment, the G7 confirmed its joint political intention to finalize and implement a comprehensive prohibition of services that enable maritime transportation of Russian-origin crude oil and petroleum products globally – the provision of such services would only be allowed if the oil and petroleum products are purchased at or below a price (“the price cap”) determined by the broad coalition of countries adhering to and implementing the price cap.

 

https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/EN/Downloads/G7-G20/2022-09-02-g7-ministers-statement.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=7

 

See the corresponding article below from the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

 

*******

 

Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC)

 

ITAR Revisions to ITAR Part 120 In Effect

 

September 6, 2022: Changes proposed on March 22, 2022, revising the regulatory citations in ITAR Part 120 took effect September 6, 2022. There is no change in the scope of the ITAR. These changes affect industries’ compliance plans, manuals, procedures, and training. The revisions to ITAR Part 120 involved reorganization into three distinct sections; General Information, General Policies, and Processes and Definitions. Wherever your compliance plans, manuals, procedures, and training used ITAR Part 120 citations, updates to these documents are required. The use of existing documents will reflect a different definition in the ITAR.  I.E. Export was previously defined in ITAR 120.17, the new citation is ITAR 120.50. ITAR Part 120

********

 

DDTC Name And Address Changes Posted To Website

 

September 13 through 22, 2022: The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) posted the following name and/or address changes on its website at    

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_kb_article_page&sys_id=bd72ca0adbf8d30044f9ff621f961981:

  • Change in Address for Axxeum, Inc., from 100 Church Street, Suite 300, Huntsville, AL 35824 to 351 Electronics Blvd. SW, Suite A, Huntsville, AL 35824;
  • Change in Name from APSYS SAS to Airbus Protect SAS due to merger with a part of Airbus CyberSecurity SAS’ businesses;
  • Change in Address for Pennant International Limited, from Pennant Court, Staverton Technology Park, Gloucester Road, Cheltenham, Glos, GL51 6TL to Unit D1 Staverton Connection, Old Gloucester Road, Cheltenham, England GL51 OTF;
  • Change in Name from Thales Management & Services Deutschland GmbH to Thales Deutschland GmbH due to corporate restructuring.

 

*******

 

 U.S. Department of the Treasury

 

The Secretary Of The Treasury Released A Statement Regarding Implementing A Cap On The Price Of Russian Oil

 

September 2, 2022: The Secretary of the Treasury, Janet L. Yellen, released the following statement on the G7 Finance Ministers’ agreement to finalize and implement a cap on the price of Russian oil.

 

“Today, the G7 took a critical step forward in achieving our dual goals of putting downward pressure on global energy prices while denying Putin revenue to fund his brutal war in Ukraine. By committing to finalize and implement a price cap, the G7 will significantly reduce Russia’s main source of funding for its illegal war while maintaining supplies to global energy markets by keeping Russian oil flowing at lower prices. While we’ve seen energy prices ease in the United States, energy costs remain a concern for Americans and continue to be elevated globally. This price cap is one of the most powerful tools we have to fight inflation and protect workers and businesses in the United States and globally from future price spikes caused by global disruptions.

Today’s action will help deliver a major blow to Russian finances and will both hinder Russia’s ability to fight its unprovoked war in Ukraine and hasten the deterioration of the Russian economy. We have already begun to see the impact of the price cap through Russia’s hurried attempts to negotiate bilateral oil trades at massive discounts.”

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0936

 

*******

 

Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

 

OFAC Published Recent Actions Notice

 

September 19, 2022: As a reminder, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued a recent actions notice, reminding holders of property blocked pursuant to OFAC sanctions regulations published in Chapter V of Title 31 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) of the requirement to provide OFAC with an Annual Report of Blocked Property (ARBP).  Persons subject to this reporting requirement must submit a comprehensive report, as outlined in 31 C.F.R. § 501.603 of the Reporting, Procedures and Penalties Regulations (RPPR), of all blocked property held as of June 30 of the current year by September 30.

The annual reports must be filed using the mandatory spreadsheet form TD-F 90-22.50.  Completed forms should be sent to ofacreport@treasury.gov or filed through the OFAC Reporting System (ORS).  Failure to submit a required ARBP by September 30 constitutes a violation of the RPPR.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220919

 

*******

 

OFAC Issued Quarterly Reports Of Licensing Activities

 

September 27, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has released Quarterly Reports of Licensing Activities pursuant to Section 906(b) of the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 (TSRA), covering activities undertaken by OFAC under Section 906(a)(1) of the TSRA from April 2019 through September 2021.  Under the procedures established in its TSRA-related regulations, OFAC processes license applications requesting authorization to export agricultural commodities, medicine, and medical devices to Iran and Sudan under the specific licensing regime set forth in Section 906 of the TSRA.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220927 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/ofac-license-application-page/trade-sanctions-reform-and-export-enhancement-act-of-2000-tsra-program/trade-sanctions-reform-and-export-enhancement-act-of-2000-tsra-reports-to-congress#quarterly

 

LATEST SANCTIONS FINES & PENALTIES

 

This section of our newsletter provides information on the latest sanctions, fines and penalties for export violations or matters of non-compliance with the ITAR or EAR issued by the US government enforcement agencies. It is provided as a service to exporters and associates of FD Associates to remind them of the importance of extreme due diligence in all international trade and export compliance matters, particularly those involving exports subject to the ITAR or the EAR. Don't let this happen to you or your company! Call us with questions or concerns at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net.

 

Sanctions

 

Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

 

September 8, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 55241: The Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued an interim final rule revising the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to authorize the release of certain technology and software in the context of standards setting and development in standards organizations. The changes made in this interim final rule address concerns from U.S. industry and other stakeholders about whether BIS licenses are required to release low-level technology for legitimate standards activities to parties on the Entity List stemming from the listing of Huawei and a number of its non-U.S. affiliates.

 

This rule is consistent with public comments received from the June 2020 interim final rule, specifically that additional actions are needed to protect U.S. technology without discouraging the full participation of U.S. companies in international standards development efforts. The rule amends the EAR to authorize the release of certain technology and software subject to the EAR to entities on the Entity List without a license when that release occurs in a standards-related activity with the intent that the resulting standard will be “published.” The requirement that the standard be published undermines any risk of unwanted transfer of proprietary technology.

 

The rule also revises the terms used in the EAR to describe the actions permissible under the authorization. As a result of this interim final rule, the release of EAR99 and Anti-Terrorism (AT) only controlled “software” and “technology,” as well as certain “software” and “technology” for specified cryptographic functionality, are included in the scope of the authorization. This interim final rule also defines the term “standards-related activity” to describe the actions permissible under the authorization.

 

Lastly, this interim final rule amends the scope of the authorization to apply to all entities listed in the Entity List. The rule only addresses Entity List related licensing requirements, and other export controls may apply and require authorization from BIS. BIS seeks public comments on the impact of these additional controls on participation in the standards-related activity.

 

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/about-bis/newsroom/press-releases/3127-2022-09-08-bis-press-release-standards-rule/file and https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/09/09/2022-19415/authorization-of-certain-items-to-entities-on-the-entity-list-in-the-context-of-specific-standards

 

*******

 

September 16, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 57068: In response to the Russian Federation’s (Russia’s) ongoing aggression against Ukraine, the Department of Commerce expanded the existing sanctions against Russia and Belarus by imposing new export controls, including expanding the scope of the Russian industry sector sanctions to add lower-level items potentially useful for Russia’s chemical and biological weapons production capabilities and items needed for advanced production and development capabilities to enable advanced manufacturing across a number of industries. This rule also added Belarus to the scope of industry sector sanctions that currently apply solely to Russia. With respect to end users, this rule expanded the ‘military end user’ and ‘military-intelligence end user’ controls and applies the Russian/Belarusian Military End User Foreign Direct Product (FDP) rule to ten existing entries on the Entity List for six existing end users that have continued to supply Russian entities on the Entity List or are under sanction since Russia’s further invasion of Ukraine. Labeling these six end users as Russian ‘military end users’ and applying the Russia/Belarus-Military End User FDP rule to them will degrade Russia’s war efforts in Ukraine, as these entities produce items needed by the Russian and Belarussian military and industrial sectors. Correspondingly, this rule further specifies with respect to Burmese, Cambodian, Chinese, and Venezuelan ‘military end users’ located outside of Burma, Cambodia, China, or Venezuela that the requirement is limited to only those ‘military end users’ identified on the ‘Military EndUser’ (MEU) List. Finally, this rule refined existing controls on Russia and Belarus by adding additional dollar value exclusion thresholds for ‘luxury goods;’ and makes twelve corrections and clarifications to existing controls on Russia and Belarus. The Department of Commerce took these actions to clarify and enhance the effectiveness of U.S. controls and to better align its controls on both Russia.

 

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/regulations-docs/federal-register-notices/federal-register-2022/3136-87-fr-57068/file

 

*******

 

September 19, 2022: The U.S. Commerce Department, through the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), updated its list of aircraft that have flown into Russia in apparent violation of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by adding the first three Iranian-owned and -operated aircraft providing cargo flight services on U.S.-origin aircraft to Russia. There are now a total of 183 aircraft identified on the list for apparent violations of U.S. export controls. Using commercially available data, BIS identified three Iranian cargo aircraft subject to the EAR flying and transporting goods, including electronic items, to Russia in apparent violation of BIS’s stringent export controls on Russia. These aircraft are operated by Mahan Air, Qeshm Fars Air, and Iran Air. Any subsequent actions taken with regard to any of the listed aircraft, including, but not limited to, refueling, maintenance, repair, or the provision of spare parts or services, are subject to the prohibitions outlined in General Prohibition Ten of the EAR (15 C.F.R. § 736.2(b)(10)).

 

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/about-bis/newsroom/press-releases/3138-bis-press-release-gp10-iranian-craft-additions/file

 

*******

 

September 26, 2022: The U.S. Commerce Department, through the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), has updated its list of aircraft, a majority of which are U.S. origin, that have flown into Russia in apparent violation of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by adding a fourth Iranian-owned and -operated aircraft providing cargo flight services on U.S.-origin aircraft to Russia. Public reporting shows that an airplane owned by Saha Airlines, which itself is owned and operated by the Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force, has flown into Russia without BIS authorization since export controls were imposed on such aircraft on February 24, 2022. There are now a total of 184 aircraft identified on the list for apparent violations of U.S. export controls.

 

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/about-bis/newsroom/press-releases/3143-2022-09-26-bis-press-release-additional-iranian-gp10-aircraft/file

 

*******

 

Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

 

September 2, 2022: The Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced that it will amend and reissue in their entirety, the Cyber-Related Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 578.  This administrative action replaces the regulations that were published in abbreviated form on December 31, 2015, with a more comprehensive set of regulations that includes additional interpretive and definitional guidance, general licenses, and other regulatory provisions that will provide further guidance to the public. The Cyber-Related Sanctions Regulations became effective when they were published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, September 6, 2022.

 

In addition, the publication of this final rule has triggered an automatic administrative update to a number of sanctions entries.  The unique identifier numbers (UIDs) for the affected entries are listed below as part of this administrative update.  The UIDs for the sanctions entries affected by this update are found at the following link:

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220902

and

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/20220902_cyber_regulations.pdf

 

*******

 

September 8, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated an air transportation service provider for its involvement in the shipment of Iranian Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to Russia for its war against Ukraine. Additionally, OFAC designated three companies and one individual involved in the research, development, production, and procurement of Iranian UAVs and UAV components, including the Shahed series of drones, for Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and its Aerospace Force (IRGC ASF) and Navy.

 

The following name has been added to OFAC's list of Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List:

 

  • Heidari, Rahmatollah of Iran;

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Baharestan Kish Company of Iran;
  • Design And Manufacturing Of Aero-Engine Company of Iran;
  • Paravar Pars Company of Iran; and
  • Safiran Airport Services of Iran.

 

OFAC also issued Russia-related General License 13B.

 

General License 13B: U.S. persons, or entities owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a U.S. person, are authorized to pay taxes, fees, or import duties, and purchase or receive permits, licenses, registrations, or certifications, to the extent such transactions are prohibited by Directive 4 under Executive Order (E.O.) 14024, Prohibitions Related to Transactions Involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, provided such transactions are ordinarily incident and necessary to the day-to-day operations in the Russian Federation of such U.S. persons or entities, through 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time, December 7, 2022.

 

This general license does not authorize:

(1) Any debit to an account on the books of a U.S. financial institution of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, or the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation; or

(2) Any transactions otherwise prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR), including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the RuHSR, unless separately authorized.

 

Effective September 8, 2022, General License No. 13A, dated May 25, 2022, is replaced and superseded in its entirety by this General License No. 13B.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl13b.pdf and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220908 and https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0940

 

*******

September 9, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)  designated Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS) and its Minister of Intelligence for engaging in cyber-enabled activities against the United States and its allies. Since at least 2007, the MOIS and its cyber actor proxies have conducted malicious cyber operations targeting a range of government and private-sector organizations around the world and across various critical infrastructure sectors. In July 2022, cyber threat actors assessed to be sponsored by the Government of Iran and MOIS disrupted Albanian government computer systems, forcing the government to suspend online public services for its citizens.

 

As a result of these designations, all property and interests in property of the designated targets that are subject to U.S. jurisdiction are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them. Additionally, any entities that are owned 50 percent or more by one or more designated persons are also blocked. All transactions by U.S. persons or within (or transiting) the United States that involve any property or interests in property of designated or otherwise blocked persons are prohibited unless authorized by a general or specific license issued by OFAC, or exempt. These prohibitions include the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any blocked person and the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

 

In addition, non-U.S. persons that engage in certain transactions with the persons designated may themselves be exposed to the designation. Furthermore, any foreign financial institution that knowingly conducts or facilitates a significant transaction for or on behalf of the persons designated could be subject to U.S. correspondent or payable-through account sanctions.

 

The following individual has been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Khatib, Esmail of Iran.

 

The following changes have been made to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Iranian Ministry Of Intelligence And Security (a.k.a. Vezarat-E Ettela'at Va Amniat-E Keshvar; a.k.a. "MOIS"; a.k.a. "VEVAK"), bounded roughly by Sanati Street on the west, 30th Street on the south, and Iraqi Street on the east, Tehran, Iran; Ministry of Intelligence, Second Negarestan Street, Pasdaran Avenue, Tehran, Iran; Additional Sanctions Information - Subject to Secondary Sanctions;
  • Iranian Ministry Of Intelligence And Security (a.k.a. Vezarat-E Ettela'at Va Amniat-E Keshvar; a.k.a. "MOIS"; a.k.a. "VEVAK"), bounded roughly by Sanati Street on the west, 30th Street on the south, and Iraqi Street on the east, Tehran, Iran; and
  • Ministry of Intelligence, Second Negarestan Street, Pasdaran Avenue, Tehran, Iran.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0941 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220909

 

*******

 

September 9, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) published Preliminary Guidance on Implementation of a Maritime Services Policy and Related Price Exception for Seaborne Russian Oil.

 

As part of a coalition of countries including the G7 and the EU, the United States will implement a policy with regard to a broad range of services related to the maritime transportation (the “maritime services policy”) of Russian Federation origin crude oil and petroleum products (“seaborne Russian oil”). This ban will take effect on December 5, 2022, with respect to maritime transportation of crude oil, and on February 5, 2023, with respect to maritime transportation of petroleum products.

 

This policy, constructed as a ban on services, will have an important exception: jurisdictions or actors that purchase seaborne Russian oil at or below a price cap to be established by the coalition (the “price exception”) will expressly be able to receive such services. This policy is intended to expressly establish a framework for Russian oil to be exported by sea under a capped price and achieve three objectives:

  • Maintain a reliable supply of seaborne Russian oil to the global market;
  • Reduce upward pressure on energy prices; and
  • Reducing the revenues the Russian Federation earns from oil after its own war of choice in Ukraine has inflated global energy prices.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220909_33 and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/cap_guidance_20220909.pdf

 

*******

 

September 13, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) published new Cyber-related Frequently Asked Questions (1076-1079).

 

Question 1076: What is prohibited as a result of OFAC’s designation of Tornado Cash?

 

Answer: On August 8, 2022, OFAC designated the entity Tornado Cash for facilitating the laundering of proceeds of cybercrimes, including those committed by the Lazarus Group, a North Korea state-sponsored hacking group that was sanctioned in 2019.  As described in FAQs 561 and 562, OFAC may include identifiers on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) specific virtual currency wallet addresses associated with blocked persons.  As part of the SDN List entry for Tornado Cash, OFAC included as identifiers certain virtual currency wallet addresses associated with Tornado Cash, as well as the URL address for Tornado Cash’s website.  The Tornado Cash website has since been deleted from the Internet, but it currently remains available through certain Internet archives.

While engaging in any transaction with Tornado Cash or its blocked property or interests in property is prohibited for U.S. persons, interacting with open-source code itself in a way that does not involve a prohibited transaction with Tornado Cash is not prohibited.  For example, U.S. persons would not be prohibited by U.S. sanctions regulations from copying the open-source code and making it available online for others to view, as well as discussing, teaching about, or including open-source code in written publications, such as textbooks, absent additional facts.  Similarly, U.S. persons would not be prohibited by U.S. sanctions regulations from visiting the Internet archives for the Tornado Cash historical website, nor would they be prohibited from visiting the Tornado Cash website if it again becomes active on the Internet.

 

Question 1077: Can U.S. persons engage in transactions involving identified Tornado Cash virtual currency wallet addresses absent a specific license from OFAC?

 

Answer: No.  U.S. persons are prohibited from engaging in transactions involving Tornado Cash, including through the virtual currency wallet addresses that OFAC has identified.  If U.S. persons were to initiate or otherwise engage in a transaction with Tornado Cash, including or through one of its wallet addresses, such a transaction would violate U.S. sanctions prohibitions unless exempt or authorized by OFAC.

 

Question 1078: Do OFAC reporting obligations apply to “dusting” transactions?

 

Answer: OFAC is aware of reports following the designation of Tornado Cash that certain U.S. persons may have received unsolicited and nominal amounts of virtual currency or other virtual assets from Tornado Cash, a practice commonly referred to as “dusting.”  Technically, OFAC’s regulations would apply to these transactions.  To the extent, however, these “dusting” transactions have no other sanctions nexus besides Tornado Cash, OFAC will not prioritize enforcement against the delayed receipt of initial blocking reports and subsequent annual reports of blocked property from such U.S. persons.

 

For guidance related to filing an initial and annual report of the blocked property, please see FAQs 49, 50, and 646, respectively, and 31 C.F.R. § 501.603.  Please note that the annual filing requirement for 2022 applies only to persons holding blocked property as of June 30 of this year.

 

Question 1079: I sent the virtual currency to Tornado Cash but did not complete the mixing transaction or otherwise withdraw my virtual currency before Tornado Cash’s August 8, 2022 designation.  How can I complete the transaction or withdraw my virtual currency without violating U.S. sanctions regulations?

 

Answer: For transactions involving Tornado Cash that were initiated prior to its designation on August 8, 2022, but not completed by the date of designation, U.S. persons or persons conducting transactions within U.S. jurisdiction may request a specific license from OFAC to engage in transactions involving the subject virtual currency.  U.S. persons should be prepared to provide, at a minimum, all relevant information regarding these transactions with Tornado Cash, including the wallet addresses for the remitter and beneficiary, transaction hashes, the date and time of the transaction(s), as well as the amount(s) of virtual currency.  OFAC would have a favorable licensing policy towards such applications, provided that the transaction did not involve other sanctionable conduct.

 

In order to apply for a specific license to complete a transaction or withdraw virtual currency involving Tornado Cash that was deposited prior to its designation or to engage in other transactions or dealings with Tornado Cash, you are encouraged to file a licensing request by visiting the following link: https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/ofac-license-application-page.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/added/2022-09-13 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220913_33

 

*******

 

September 14, 2022:  The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned ten individuals and two entities for their roles in conducting malicious cyber acts, including ransomware activity. These designations are part of joint action with the Department of Justice, Department of State, Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Cyber Command, National Security Agency, and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. The individuals and entities designated are all affiliated with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).  These actions continue the series of OFAC designations that aim to protect U.S. persons from ransomware activity, facilitators of ransomware activity, and other cybercrime.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Agha Ahmadi, Mohammad of Iran;
  • Agha-Ahmadi, Ali of Iran;
  • Ahmadi, Mansour of Iran;
  • Haji Hosseini, Mojtaba of Iran;
  • Haji Hosseini, Mostafa of Iran;
  • Khatibi Aghada, Ahmad of Iran;
  • Mahdavi, Mo'in of Iran;
  • Nikaeen Ravari, Amir Hossein of Iran;
  • Rashidi-Barjini, Aliakbar of Iran;
  • Shakeri Ashtijeh, Mohammad of Iran.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Afkar System Yazd Company of Iran; and
  • Najee Technology Hooshmand Fater LLC of Iran.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220914 and https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0948

 

*******

 

September 15, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has issued Russia-related General License 51 "Authorizing the Wind Down of Transactions Involving Limited Liability Company Group of Companies Akvarius." All transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind-down of any transaction involving Limited Liability Company Group of Companies Akvarius (Aquarius), or any entity in which Aquarius owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest, that are prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024, are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, October 15, 2022, provided that any payment to a blocked person must be made into a blocked account in accordance with the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR).

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl51.pdf

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Akhmadova, Aminat of Russia;
  • Astanin, Eddie Vladimirovich of Russia;
  • Balytskyi, Yevhen Vitaliiovych of Russia;
  • Bandura, Volodymyr Volodymyrovich of Ukraine;
  • Belousov, Mikhail Nikolaevich of Russia and the Ukraine;
  • Bespalov, Vladimir Aleksandrovich of Russia and the Ukraine;
  • Bulgakov, Sergei Viktorovich of the Ukraine;
  • Cherevko, Serhiy Mykolayovych of the Ukraine;
  • Dolgopolov, Andrey Nikolayevich of Russia, the Ukraine, and Kyrgyzstan;
  • Emelianenko, Viktor Andriyovych of the Ukraine;
  • Ermakova, Mariya Gennadevna of Russia and the Ukraine;
  • Filipchuk, Pavlo Ihorovych of the Ukraine;
  • Gramashov, Dmitry Sergeevich of the Ukraine;
  • Ibragimov, Turpal-Ali Vakhayevich of Russia;
  • Kadyrov, Ramzan Akhmatovich of Russia;
  • Kadyrova, Ayshat Ramzanovna of Russia;
  • Kadyrova, Karina Ramzanovna of Russia;
  • Kadyrova, Medni Musaevna of Russia;
  • Kadyrova, Tabarik Ramzanovna of Russia;
  • Khazueva, Fatima Shaykhievna of Russia;
  • Kobets, Oleksandr Yuriyovych of the Ukraine;
  • Koltsov, Anton Viktorovich of Russia;
  • Komlev, Vladimir Valerievich of Russia;
  • Kryllo, Pavel Velerevich of Russia;
  • Kuz'mych, Tetyana Oleksandrivna of the Ukraine;
  • Lvova-Belova, Maria Alexeyevna of Russia;
  • Milchakov, Alexey Yurevich of Russia;
  • Mozhelyanskiy, Viktor Anatolyevich of Russia and the Ukraine;
  • Mutamba, Stephen of Zimbabwe;
  • Oreshkin, Maxim Stanislavovich of Russia;
  • Pakhnyts, Valery Mykhailovych of the Ukraine;
  • Petrovskiy, Yan Igorevich of Russia and the Ukraine;
  • Rodikov, Mikhail Leonidovich of Russia and the Ukraine;
  • Rogov, Volodymyr Valeriyovych of the Ukraine;
  • Samoilenko, Mykyta Ivanovich of the Ukraine;
  • Saulenko, Oleksandr Fedorovych of the Ukraine;
  • Selivanov, Oleksiy Sergeevich of the Ukraine;
  • Semenchev, Ihor Ihorovych of the Ukraine;
  • Shelestenko, Hennadiy Oleksandrovych of the Ukraine;
  • Siguta, Andriy Leonidovich of the Ukraine;
  • Titskiy, Anton Robertovich of the Ukraine;
  • Trofimov, Andriy Yuriovych of the Ukraine
  • Tumilina, Tetyana Yuriivna of the Ukraine;
  • Zhidkov, Viktor Olegovich of Russia.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Baikal Electronics JSC of Russia;
  • Elvees Research And Development Center JSC of Russia;
  • Federal Research Center Institute Of Applied Physics Of The Russian Academy Of Sciences of Russia;
  • Federal State Financed Institution Of Science Higher Education Institution Spectroscopy Of The Russian Federation Academy Of Sciences of Russia;
  • Federal State Financed Institution Of Science Physical Higher Education Institution Named After P. N. Lebedeva Of The Russian Federation Academy Sciences of Russia;
  • Federal State Financed Institution Of Science Physics And Technology Institute Named After A. F. Ioffe Of The Russian Federation Academy Of Sciences of Russia;
  • Federal State Financed Institution Of Science Physics And Technology Institute Named After K. A. Valieva Of The Russian Federation Academy Of Sciences of Russia;
  • International Center For Quantum Optics And Quantum Technologies Limited Liability Company of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Angstrem of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Element of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Institute For Scientific Research Elektronnoy Tekhniki of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Institute For Scientific Research Vychislitelnykh Kompleksov Named After M. A. Kartseva of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Production Association Sever of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Research And Development Enterprise Radiosvyaz of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Research And Development Enterprise Sapfir of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Research And Production Association Named After S. A. Lavochkina of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Research Center Elins of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Rossiyskiye Kosmicheskiye Sistemy of Russia;
  • Joint Venture Quantum Technologies of Russia;
  • JSC Academician M.F. Reshetnev Information Satellite Systems of Russia;
  • JSC Additive Technologies Center of Russia;
  • JSC Moscow Center Of Sparc Technologies of Russia;
  • JSC Scientific And Technical Center Zaslon of Russia;
  • D. Landau Institute For Theoretical Physics Of Russian Academy Of Sciences of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company Firdaws of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company Group Of Companies Akvarius of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company Krokus Nanoelektronika of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company Yadro Fab Dubna of Russia;
  • Multiclet Corporation of Russia;
  • Rzhanov Institute Of Semiconductor Physics Siberian Branch Of Russian Academy Of Sciences of Russia;
  • Specialized Engineering And Design Bureau Of Electronic Systems Joint Stock Company of Russia; and
  • Task Force Rusich of Russia.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220915

 

********

 

September 15, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued Russia-related General License 52. News reporting organizations that are U.S. persons, and individual U.S. persons who are journalists (including photojournalists) or broadcast or technical personnel, are authorized to engage in the following transactions, where such transactions are ordinarily incident and necessary to such U.S. persons’ journalistic activities or to the establishment or operation of a news bureau and are prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 or section (1)(a)(i) of E.O. 14071, provided that the only involvement of blocked persons is the processing of funds by financial institutions blocked pursuant to E.O. 14024:

(1) Compensating support staff (e.g., stringers, translators, interpreters, camera operators, technical experts, freelance producers, or drivers), persons to handle logistics or other office personnel;

(2) Leasing or renting office space;

(3) Purchasing, leasing, or renting goods and services (e.g., mobile phones and related airtime); or

(4) Paying for all other expenses ordinarily incident and necessary to journalistic activities, including sales or employment taxes.

 

For the purposes of this general license, the term “news reporting organization” means an entity whose primary purpose is the gathering and dissemination of news to the general public.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl52.pdf

 

*******

 

September 15, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has published a Determination Pursuant to Section 1(a)(i) of Executive Order 14024, a Determination Pursuant to Section 1(a)(ii) of Executive Order 14071, four related Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) (1083-1086), and five amended FAQs (1033, 1034, 1059, 1061, 1062).

 

Determination Pursuant to Section 1(a)(i) of Executive Order 14024: Section 1(a) of Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 of April 15, 2021 (“Blocking Property With Respect To Specified Harmful Foreign Activities of the Government of the Russian Federation”) imposes economic sanctions on any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, or the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, to operate or have operated in such sectors of the Russian Federation economy as may be determined, pursuant to section 1(a)(i) of E.O. 14024, by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State. To further address the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States described in E.O. 14024, and in consultation with the Department of State and pursuant to 31 CFR § 587.802, OFAC determined that section 1(a)(i) shall apply to the quantum computing sector of the Russian Federation economy. Any person that the Secretary of the Treasury or the Secretary of the Treasury’s designee, in consultation with the Secretary of State or the Secretary of State’s designee, or the Secretary of State or the Secretary of State’s designee, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury or the Secretary of the Treasury’s designee, subsequently determines operates or has operated in this sector shall be subject to sanctions pursuant to section 1(a)(i).

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/determination_09152022_eo14024.pdf

 

Determination Pursuant to Section 1(a)(ii) of Executive Order 14071: Pursuant to sections 1(a)(ii), 1(b), and 5 of Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 of April 6, 2022 (“Prohibiting New Investment in and Certain Services to the Russian Federation in Response to Continued Russian Federation Aggression”) and 31 CFR § 587.802, the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control, in consultation with the Department of State, hereby determines that the prohibitions in section 1(a)(ii) of E.O. 14071 shall apply to quantum computing services. As a result, the following activities are prohibited, except to the extent provided by law, or unless licensed or otherwise authorized by the Office of Foreign Assets Control: the exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, from the United States, or by a United States person, wherever located, of quantum computing services to any person located in the Russian Federation.

 

This determination excludes the following:

(1) any service to an entity located in the Russian Federation that is owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a United States person; and

 

(2) any service in connection with the wind-down or divestiture of an entity located in the Russian Federation that is not owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a Russian person.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/determination_09152022_eo14071.pdf

 

OFAC has published four Frequently Asked Questions:

 

Question 1080: I am a U.S. person with an account at a Russian financial institution blocked pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14024.  What am I required or allowed to do under OFAC sanctions with respect to such accounts? 

 

Answer: Since Russia’s further invasion of Ukraine beginning in February 2022, OFAC has blocked a number of Russian financial institutions pursuant to E.O. 14024 for operating or having operated in the financial services sector of the Russian Federation economy (see FAQ 966).  In addition, all property and interests in property of any financial institution that is owned, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, 50 percent or more by one or more blocked persons are also blocked.  Accordingly, U.S. persons are prohibited from transacting with these financial institutions unless the activity is exempt or authorized by OFAC.

 

Question 1081: Am I required to show official documentation that I’ve closed my account at a Russian financial institution blocked pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 in order to take advantage of Russia-related General License (GL) 50? 

 

Answer: No. GL 50 authorizes individuals with accounts at Russian financial institutions blocked pursuant to E.O. 14024 to unblock and lump sum transfer funds to an account at a non-designated financial institution.  Individuals do not need to provide official documentation proving they have closed their account at the blocked Russian financial institution when utilizing the GL.

 

Question 1082: National Payment Card System Joint Stock Company (NSPK) is not a blocked entity under the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR).  Do non-U.S. financial institutions risk exposure to sanctions for contracting or otherwise dealing with NSPK? 

 

Answer: NSPK is the operator of Russia’s MIR National Payment System, which clears and settles payments between consumers, merchants, and banks for debit and credit card payments, primarily in the Russian Federation.  NSPK and the MIR National Payment System process transactions for designated Russian banks and may be used to process transactions involving other sanctioned persons or activity under the RuHSR.  Accordingly, those non-U.S. financial institutions that enter into new or expanded agreements with NSPK risk supporting Russia’s efforts to evade U.S. sanctions through the expanded use of the MIR National Payment System outside the territory of the Russian Federation.

 

The RuHSR authorizes OFAC to impose blocking sanctions on persons determined to have materially assisted, sponsored or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of (i) any activity sanctionable under the RuHSR, including deceptive or structured transactions or dealings to circumvent any United States sanctions or (ii) any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to the RuHSR.  OFAC is prepared to use these targeting authorities in response to supporters of Russia’s sanctions evasion, including Russia’s efforts to expand the use of NSPK or the MIR National Payment System outside of the territory of the Russian Federation.

 

Question 1083: What actions were taken on September 15, 2022, related to certain quantum computing services? 

 

Answer: On September 15, 2022, the Director of OFAC, in consultation with the Department of State, issued a determination pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14071, “Prohibitions Related to Certain Quantum Computing Services,” prohibiting the exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, from the United States, or by a United States person, wherever located, of certain quantum computing services to any person located in the Russian Federation.  This determination takes effect on October 15, 2022.  This determination excludes from the scope of the prohibited services: (1) any service to an entity located in the Russian Federation that is owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a United States person; and (2) any service in connection with the wind-down or divestiture of an entity located in the Russian Federation that is not owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a Russian person.  For more information, please see FAQ 1084.

 

Question 1084: For the purposes of the determination of September 15, 2022, made pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14071, “Prohibitions Related to Certain Quantum Computing Services” (“the determination”),  what is meant by the term “quantum computing services”?

 

Answer: For the purposes of the determination, OFAC anticipates publishing regulations defining this term to include any of the following services when related to quantum computing, quantum computers, electronic assemblies thereof, or cryogenic refrigeration systems related to quantum computing:  infrastructure, web hosting, or data processing services; custom computer programming services; computer systems integration design services; computer systems and data processing facilities management services; computing infrastructure, data processing services, web hosting services, and related services; repairing computer, computer peripherals, or communication equipment; other computer-related services; as well as services related to the exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, of quantum computing, quantum computers, electronic assemblies thereof, or cryogenic refrigeration systems related to quantum computing to any person located in the Russian Federation.

 

For the purposes of the determination, OFAC also anticipates publishing regulations defining the term “person located in the Russian Federation” as set forth in FAQ 1058, as well as regulations defining the term “Russian person” to mean an individual who is a citizen or national of the Russian Federation, or an entity organized under the laws of the Russian Federation.

 

Question 1085: Does the determination of September 15, 2022, made pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 with regard to the quantum computing sector of the Russian Federation economy mean that all persons that operate or have operated in these sectors of the Russian Federation economy are sanctioned by OFAC?

 

Answer: No.  The Director of OFAC, in consultation with the State Department, has issued a determination pursuant to E.O. 14024 that authorizes the imposition of economic sanctions against persons that operate or have operated in the quantum computing sector of the Russian Federation economy.

 

Question 1086: For the purposes of the determination of September 15, 2022, made pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14024, what is meant by the term “quantum computing sector of the Russian Federation economy”?

 

Answer: For the purposes of the determination of September 15, 2022, made pursuant to E.O. 14024, OFAC interprets the term “quantum computing sector of the Russian Federation economy” to include activities related to products and services in or involving the Russian Federation in research, development, manufacturing, assembling, maintenance, repair, sale, or supply of quantum computing, quantum computers, electronic assemblies thereof, or cryogenic refrigeration systems related to quantum computing.  OFAC also interprets the term “quantum computing sector of the Russian Federation economy” to include any of the following services when related to quantum computing:  infrastructure, web hosting or data processing services; custom computer programming services; computer systems integration design services; computer systems and data processing facilities management services; computing infrastructure, data processing services, web hosting services, and related services; repairing computer, computer peripherals, and communication equipment; other computer-related services; as well as the exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, of quantum computing, quantum computers, electronic assemblies thereof, or cryogenic refrigeration systems related to quantum computing to or from the Russian Federation.

 

A sector determination pursuant to E.O. 14024 exposes persons that operate or have operated in an identified sector to sanctions risk; however, a sector determination does not automatically impose sanctions on all persons who operate or have operated in the sector.  Only persons determined, pursuant to E.O. 14024, by the Secretary of the Treasury in consultation with the Secretary of State, or by the Secretary of State in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, or their delegates, to operate or have operated in the above-identified sectors are subject to sanctions.

 

Persons sanctioned pursuant to E.O. 14024 for operating or having operated in an identified sector are added to one or more OFAC sanctions lists based on the type of sanction, including the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List), the List of Foreign Financial Institutions Subject to Correspondent Account or Payable-Through Account Sanctions (CAPTA List), and the Non-SDN Menu-Based Sanctions List (NS-MBS List).
On September 15, 2022, the Director of OFAC, in consultation with the Department of State, also issued a sectoral determination pursuant to E.O. 14024 that authorizes the imposition of economic sanctions on individuals and entities that are determined to operate or have operated in the quantum computing sector of the Russian Federation economy.  The determination regarding this sector pursuant to E.O. 14024 takes effect immediately.
Individuals who have filed a blocking report with OFAC and are availing themselves of GL 50 must file an unblocking report with OFAC within 10 business days of the unblocking in accordance with 31 CFR § 501.603(b)(3).  For guidance related to filing an initial report of the blocked property, an annual report of the blocked property, and an unblocking report, please see FAQs 49, 50, and 646, respectively, and 31 C.F.R. § 501.603.  Please note that the annual filing requirement for 2022 applies only to persons holding blocked property as of June 30 of this year.

 

In practice, this means that accounts held by U.S. persons at any blocked Russian financial institutions generally are themselves considered blocked property unless exempt.  This includes, for example, checking and savings accounts, credit cards, CDs, loans, and mortgages.  U.S. persons must stop utilizing such accounts and treat them as blocked, even if the designated Russian financial institution does not.  Additionally, within 10 business days of the blocking of the account or other property, U.S. persons are required to file a blocking report with OFAC describing any property or interests in property (e.g., accounts, etc.).  Information on the requirement to report blocked property, including accounts, and on filing initial and annual reports of blocked property with OFAC can be found in FAQs 49, 50, and 646, respectively, and 31 CFR § 501.603.  Please note that the annual filing requirement for 2022 applies only to persons holding blocked property as of June 30 of this year.

 

On August 19, 2022, OFAC issued Russia-related General License (GL) 50 authorizing individuals, wherever located, to engage in all transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to close their individual accounts held at a financial institution blocked pursuant to E.O. 14024.  GL 50 also authorizes the unblocking and lump sum transfer to the account holder of all remaining funds and other assets in the account at the blocked financial institution, including to an account held at a non-blocked financial institution.  Individuals may avail themselves of GL 50 to terminate their accounts with Russian financial institutions blocked pursuant to E.O. 14024 and repatriate the proceeds of any account closures.  Individuals who have filed a blocking report with OFAC and are availing themselves of GL 50 must file an unblocking report with OFAC within 10 business days of the unblocking in accordance with 31 CFR § 501.603(b)(3).

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/added/2022-09-15

 

OFAC Amended Five Frequently Asked Questions:

 

Question 1033: What actions were taken on May 8, 2022, related to certain accounting, trust and corporate formation, and management consulting services?

 

Answer: On May 8, 2022, the Director of OFAC, in consultation with the Department of State, issued a determination pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14071, “Prohibitions Related to Certain Accounting, Trust and Corporate Formation, and Management Consulting Services,” prohibiting the exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, from the United States, or by a United States person, wherever located, of certain accounting, trust, and corporate formation, and management consulting services to any person located in the Russian Federation.  This determination takes effect on June 7, 2022.  For more information, please see FAQ 1034.

 

On May 8, 2022, the Director of OFAC, in consultation with the Department of State, also issued a sectoral determination pursuant to E.O. 14024 that authorizes the imposition of economic sanctions on individuals and entities that operate or have operated in the accounting, trust and corporate formation services, or management consulting sectors of the Russian Federation economy.  This determination takes effect on May 8, 2022.  For further information, please see FAQ 1037.

 

Question 1034: For the purposes of the determination of May 8, 2022, made pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14071, “Prohibitions Related to Certain Accounting, Trust and Corporate Formation, and Management Consulting Services,” what is meant by the terms “accounting,” “trust and corporate formation,” and “management consulting” services?

 

Answer: For the purposes of the determination of May 8, 2022, made pursuant to E.O. 14071, OFAC anticipates publishing regulations defining these terms to include the following:

  • “Accounting services” – includes services related to the measurement, processing, and evaluation of financial data about economic entities.  Please note that OFAC has issued General License 35 to authorize certain transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, from the United States or by a United States person, wherever located, of credit rating or auditing services to any person located in the Russian Federation through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, August 20, 2022.  See FAQ 1035.
  • “Trust and corporate formation services” – includes services related to assisting persons in forming or structuring legal persons, such as trusts and corporations; acting or arranging for other persons to act as directors, secretaries, administrative trustees, trust fiduciaries, registered agents, or nominee shareholders of legal persons; providing a registered office, business address, correspondence address, or administrative address for legal persons; and providing administrative services for trusts.  Please note that all of these activities are common activities of the trust and corporate service providers (TCSPs), although they may be provided by other persons.
  • “Management consulting services” – includes services related to strategic business advice; organizational and systems planning, evaluation, and selection; development or evaluation of marketing programs or implementation; mergers, acquisitions, and organizational structure; staff augmentation and human resources policies and practices; and brand management.

 

This determination excludes from the scope of the aforementioned services: (1) any service to an entity located in the Russian Federation that is owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a United States person; and (2) any service in connection with the wind-down or divestiture of an entity located in the Russian Federation that is not owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a Russian person.

For the purposes of the prohibitions set forth in the determination of May 8, 2022, made pursuant to E.O. 14071, OFAC anticipates publishing regulations defining the term “person located in the Russian Federation” as set forth in FAQ 1058.  For the purposes of the exclusion set forth in the determination of May 8, 2022, made pursuant to E.O. 14071, OFAC anticipates publishing regulations defining the term “Russian person” to mean an individual who is a citizen or national of the Russian Federation or an entity organized under the laws of the Russian Federation.

 

Question 1059: Do the determinations made pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 on May 8, 2022, “Prohibitions Related to Certain Accounting, Trust and Corporate Formation, and Management Consulting Services,” and on September 15, 2022, “Prohibitions Related to Certain Quantum Computing Services” (“the determinations”), prohibit U.S. persons from providing services to persons located outside of the Russian Federation that are owned or controlled by persons located in the Russian Federation?

 

Answer: No, provided that the provision of services is not an indirect export to a person located in the Russian Federation.  For the purposes of these determinations, OFAC interprets the “indirect” provision of the prohibited services to include when the benefit of the services is ultimately received by a “person located in the Russian Federation.”

 

In contrast, OFAC would not consider to be prohibited the provision of services to a non-Russian company that has a physical presence and operations outside of the Russian Federation, including such a company owned or controlled by persons located in the Russian Federation, provided that the services will not be further exported or reexported to persons located in the Russian Federation.

 

For example, the following scenarios describe services that would be prohibited under the determination:

  • A U.S. corporate service provider administers a trust established under the laws of a U.S. state, where the trust exists predominantly to hold, sell, or purchase assets on behalf of a settlor, trustor, or beneficiary who is an individual ordinarily resident in Russia.
  • A U.S. corporate service provider registers a limited liability company in a third country on behalf of an individual ordinarily resident in Russia for the purpose of holding real estate assets, and this company has no other physical presence or operations in the third country.

 

The following scenarios illustrate services to a non-Russian subsidiary of a Russian person that would not be prohibited under the determination:

  • A U.S. accounting firm provides tax advisory and preparation services to the U.S. subsidiary of a Russian company.  This U.S. subsidiary has an office and employees in the United States and conducts business in the United States, and the services will not be exported or reexported to the Russian parent company.
  • A U.S. management consulting firm provides strategic business advice to the subsidiary of a Russian company located in a third country.  This subsidiary has an office and employees in a third country and conducts business in this third country, and the services will not be reexported to the Russian parent company.

 

Question 1061: Do the determinations made pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 on May 8, 2022, “Prohibitions Related to Certain Accounting, Trust and Corporate Formation, and Management Consulting Services,” and on September 15, 2022, “Prohibitions Related to Certain Quantum Computing Services” (“the determinations”), prohibit U.S. persons from working as employees of entities located in the Russian Federation?

 

Answer: Not necessarily. Under the determinations, U.S. persons are prohibited from exporting, reexporting, selling, or supplying, directly or indirectly: management consulting, trust and corporate formation services; accounting services; or quantum computing services to persons located in the Russian Federation.  Thus, U.S. persons are prohibited from providing these services to companies located in the Russian Federation (“Russian companies”) in their capacity as employees.  However, the determinations do not prohibit U.S. persons from providing other services not covered by these determinations as part of their employment by Russian companies.

 

In addition, please note that the determinations exclude from the scope of the aforementioned services:  (1) any service to an entity located in the Russian Federation that is owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a United States person; and (2) any service in connection with the wind-down or divestiture of an entity located in the Russian Federation that is not owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a Russian person.

 

Question 1062: Do the prohibitions imposed by the determinations made pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 on May 8, 2022, “Prohibitions Related to Certain Accounting, Trust and Corporate Formation, and Management Consulting Services,” and on and on September 15, 2022, “Prohibitions Related to Certain Quantum Computing Services,” apply to services provided to a parent company located in the Russian Federation by a U.S. subsidiary?

 

Answer: Yes. The prohibitions apply to services provided to a company located in the Russian Federation (the “Russian company”) by any U.S. person, including the Russian company’s U.S. subsidiary.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/updated/2022-09-15

 

*******

 

September 22, 2022:  The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated Iran’s Morality Police for abuse and violence against Iranian women and the violation of the rights of peaceful Iranian protestors. The Morality Police are responsible for the recent death of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini, who was arrested and detained for allegedly wearing a hijab improperly.

 

OFAC also targeted seven senior leaders of Iran’s security organizations: the Morality Police, the Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS), the Army’s Ground Forces, Basij Resistance Forces, and Law Enforcement Forces. These officials oversee organizations that routinely employ violence to suppress peaceful protesters and members of Iranian civil society, political dissidents, women’s rights activists, and members of the Iranian Baha’i community.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Abnoush, Salar of Iran;
  • Amanollahi, Manouchehr of Iran;
  • Heidari, Kiyumars of Iran;
  • Mirzaei, Haj Ahmad of Iran;
  • Rezaei, Qasem of Iran;
  • Esmail Khati of Iran; and
  • Rostami Cheshmeh Gachi, Mohammad of Iran.

 

The following entity has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

Iran's Morality Police of Iran.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0969 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220922

 

*******

 

September 23, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury issued Iran General License (GL) D-2 to increase support for internet freedom in Iran by bringing U.S. sanctions guidance in line with the changes in modern technology since the issuance of Iran GL D-1. The Iranian government cut off access to the Internet for most of its 80 million citizens to prevent the world from watching its violent crackdown on peaceful protestors sparked by the brutal death of Mahsa Amini in the custody of Iran’s Morality Police. While Iran’s government is cutting off its people’s access to the global internet, the United States is taking action to support the free flow of information and access to fact-based information to the Iranian people. The updated guidance will authorize technology companies to offer the Iranian people more options of secure, outside platforms and services.

 

Iran General License (GL) D-2: The following transactions are authorized:

(1) Fee-based or no-cost services. The exportation or reexportation, directly or indirectly, from the United States or by a U.S. person, wherever located, to Iran of fee-based or no-cost services incident to the exchange of communications over the Internet, such as instant messaging, chat and email, social networking, sharing of photos and movies, web browsing, blogging, social media platforms, collaboration platforms, video conferencing, e-gaming, e-learning platforms, automated translation, web maps, and user authentication services, as well as cloud-based services in support of the foregoing or of any other transaction, authorized or exempt under the ITSR.

(2) Fee-based or no-cost software. (i) Software subject to the EAR. The exportation, reexportation, or provision, directly or indirectly, to Iran of fee-based or no-cost software subject to the Export Administration Regulations, 15 CFR parts 730 through 774 (EAR), that is incident to or enables services incident to, the exchange of communications over the Internet, such as instant messaging, chat and email, social networking, sharing of photos and movies, web browsing, blogging, social media platforms, collaboration platforms, video conferencing, e-gaming, e-learning platforms, automated translation, web maps, and user authentication services, as well as cloud-based services in support of the foregoing or of any other transaction authorized or exempt under the ITSR, provided that such software is designated EAR99 or classified by the U.S. Department of Commerce on the Commerce Control List, 15 CFR part 774, Supplement No. 1 (CCL), under export control classification number (ECCN) 5D992.c.

(ii) Software that is not subject to the EAR because it is of foreign origin and is located outside the United States. The exportation, reexportation, or provision, directly or indirectly, by a U.S. person, wherever located, to Iran of fee-based or no-cost software that is not subject to the EAR because it is of foreign origin and is located outside the United States that is incident to, or enables services incident to, the exchange of communications over the Internet, such as instant messaging, chat and email, social networking, sharing of photos and movies, web browsing, blogging, social media platforms, collaboration platforms, video conferencing, e-gaming, e-learning platforms, automated translation, web maps, and user authentication services, as well as cloud-based services in support of the foregoing or of any other transaction authorized or exempt under the ITSR, provided that such software would be designated EAR99 if it were located in the United States or would meet the criteria for classification under ECCN 5D992.c if it were subject to the EAR.

(3) Additional Software, Hardware, and Related Services. To the extent not authorized by paragraphs (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this general license, the exportation, reexportation, or provision, directly or indirectly, to Iran of certain software and hardware incident to communications, as well as related services, as follows: (i) In the case of hardware and software subject to the EAR, the items specified in the Annex to this general license; (ii) In the case of hardware and software that is not subject to the EAR because it is of foreign origin and is located outside the United States that is exported, reexported, or provided, directly or indirectly, by a U.S. person, wherever located, hardware and software that is of a type described in the Annex to this general license provided that it would be designated EAR99 if it were located in the United States or would meet the criteria for classification under the relevant ECCN specified in the Annex to this general license if it were subject to the EAR; and (iii) In the case of software not subject to the EAR because it is described in 15 CFR § 734.3(b)(3) that is exported, reexported, or provided, directly or indirectly, from the United States or by a U.S. person, wherever located, software that is of a type described in the Annex to this general license.

(4) Internet connectivity services and telecommunications capacity. The exportation or reexportation, directly or indirectly, from the United States or by a U.S. person, wherever located, to Iran of non-commercial-grade Internet connectivity services, including cloud-based services, and the provision, sale, or leasing of capacity on telecommunications transmission facilities (such as satellite or terrestrial network connectivity) incident to communications.

(5) Importation into the United States of hardware and software previously exported to Iran. The importation into the United States of hardware and software authorized for exportation, reexportation, or provision to Iran under 31 CFR § 560.540(a), paragraphs (a)(2) or (a)(3) of this general license, or paragraphs (a)(2) or (a)(3) of General License D-1, by an individual entering the United States, directly or indirectly, from Iran, provided that the items previously were exported, reexported, or provided by the individual to Iran pursuant to 31 CFR § 560.540(a), paragraphs (a)(2) or (a)(3) of this general license, or paragraphs (a)(2) or (a)(3) of General License D-1 when it was in effect.

(6) Publicly available, 2 no cost services and software to the Government of Iran. 3 (i) Services. The exportation or reexportation, directly or indirectly, from the United States or by a U.S. person, wherever located, to the Government of Iran of services described in 31 CFR § 560.540(a)(1) or categories (6) through (11) of the Annex to this general license, provided that such services are publicly available at no cost to the user. (ii) Software. The exportation, reexportation, or provision, directly or indirectly, to the Government of Iran of the software described in 31 CFR § 560.540(a)(2) or categories (6) through (11) of the Annex to this general license, read in conjunction with paragraph (a)(3) of this general license, provided that such software is publicly available at no cost to the user.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0974 and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/iran_gld2.pdf

 

*******

 

September 26, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated Diana Kajmakovic, a state prosecutor in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14033 for being responsible for or complicit in corruption or the undermining of democratic processes or institutions in the Western Balkans. This action furthers the United States strategy to hold accountable those who carry out the destabilizing activity in the Western Balkans. These activities occur against the backdrop of BiH’s most serious political crisis since 1995, as ethno-nationalist politicians and affiliated patronage networks continue to undermine the country.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0975

 

*******

 

September 26, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) published one new Cuba Frequently Asked Question (1090):

 

Question 1090: Can U.S. persons send remittances to Cuba using digital payments? 

 

Answer: Yes, provided the underlying remittance transactions are authorized under 31 CFR § 515.570 of the Cuban Assets Control Regulations (CACR), and the digital payment service provider is a U.S.-registered money transmitter or other qualifying banking institution within the definition of that term provided in 31 CFR § 515.314.  For purposes of this FAQ, “digital payments” means transfers of funds sent through mobile money, mobile wallets, digital bank accounts, credit/debit cards, online payments, or other digital technology.

 

Pursuant to 31 CFR § 515.570 of the CACR, OFAC authorizes persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction to make certain categories of remittances to persons in Cuba, subject to certain conditions (please see FAQ 732 for an overview of the types of remittances U.S. persons can send and applicable conditions and requirements).  Additionally, pursuant to 31 CFR § 515.572(a)(3) of the CACR, banking institutions, as defined in 31 CFR § 515.314, including U.S.-registered money transmitters, are authorized to provide services in connection with the collection, forwarding, or receipt of authorized remittances.  Thus, digital payments service providers that fall within the definition of “banking institution” provided in 31 CFR § 515.314, including U.S.-registered money transmitters, can process authorized remittances to Cuba via digital payments.

 

A banking institution is expected to conduct a level of due diligence commensurate with its overall risk profile and internal compliance policies and procedures.  However, as noted in FAQ 1057, banking institutions, including U.S-registered money transmitters within the context of § 515.572(a)(3), may rely on the statements of their customers that remittance transactions are authorized unless they know or have reason to know a transaction is not authorized.

Section 515.572(a)(3) of the CACR does not authorize any transaction related to the collection, forwarding, or receipt of remittances involving any entity or subentity identified on the State Department’s Cuba Restricted List (CRL).

 

Generally, OFAC’s general licenses are self-executing.  This means that if U.S. persons assess that their transactions fall within the scope of the authorizations in 31 CFR § 515.570 and 31 CFR § 515.572, they may execute such transactions without further assurance from OFAC.
For transactions that do not fall within the scope of these authorizations, U.S. persons may apply for an OFAC specific license.  For example, financial institutions that fall outside the scope of 31 CFR § 515.572(a)(3) that seek to provide remittance forwarding services would not qualify for the authorization and would require a specific license.  Consistent with U.S. foreign policy, OFAC will prioritize specific license applications seeking authorization to enable remittances to flow more freely to the Cuban people via digital payments.  It is OFAC’s policy to deny specific license requests that involve transactions with CRL-listed entities for the purpose of collection, forwarding, or receipt of remittances.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/1090

 

*******

 

September 28, 2022: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) reissued in their entirety the Central African Republic Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 553, and the Western Balkans Stabilization Regulations, 31 CFR 588.  The Central African Republic Sanctions Regulations were previously published in abbreviated form in 2014.  The Western Balkans Stabilization Regulations were originally published in abbreviated form in 2002 and last amended in 2011.  These publications include additional interpretive guidance and definitions, general licenses, and other regulatory provisions that will provide further guidance to the public.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/fr87_58972.pdf and https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/fr87_58983.pdf

 

*******

 

September 29, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned an international network of companies involved in the sale of hundreds of millions of dollars worth of Iranian petrochemicals and petroleum products to end users in South and East Asia. This action targets Iranian brokers and several front companies in the UAE, Hong Kong, and India that have facilitated financial transfers and shipping of Iranian petroleum and petrochemical products. These entities have played a critical role in concealing the origin of the Iranian shipments and enabling two sanctioned Iranian brokers, Triliance Petrochemical Co. Ltd. (Triliance) and Persian Gulf Petrochemical Industry Commercial Co. (PGPICC), to transfer funds and ship Iranian petroleum and petrochemicals to buyers in Asia. In addition to OFAC’s designations, the Department of State is designating two entities based in the People’s Republic of China (PRC), Zhonggu Storage and Transportation Co. Ltd. and WS Shipping Co. Ltd., for their involvement in Iran’s petrochemical trade.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Clara Shipping LLC of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Iran Chemical Industries Investment Company Public Joint Stock of Iran;
  • Middle East Kimiya Pars CO., of Iran;
  • ML Holding Group Limited of China;
  • Sierra Vista Trading Limited of China;
  • Sophychem HK Limited of China;
  • Tibalaji Petrochem Private Limited of India;
  • Virgo Marine of the United Arab Emirates;
  • WS Shipping Co. Ltd., of China; and
  • Zhonggu Storage And Transportation Co., Ltd., of China.

 

The following vessel has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Gas Allure (3E2066) Chemical/Oil Tanker Panama flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9142150.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220929 and https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0980

 

*******

 

September 30, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated 14 persons in Russia’s military-industrial complex, including two international suppliers, three key leaders of Russia’s financial infrastructure, immediate family members of some of the senior Russian officials, and 278 members of Russia’s legislature for enabling Russia’s sham referenda and attempt to annex sovereign Ukrainian territory. In addition, OFAC issued new guidance that warns of the heightened sanctions risk that international actors outside of Russia would face for providing political or economic support to Russia as a result of its illegal attempts to change the status of Ukrainian territory.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0981

 

For this complete list of designated individuals and entities please see the following link:

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220930

 

*******

 

September 30, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) published a Russia-related Frequently Asked Question (1091).

 

Question 1091: Do non-U.S. persons face sanctions risk for supporting Russia following its sham referenda, purported annexation, and continued occupation of the Kherson, Zaporizhzhya, Donetsk, and Luhansk regions of Ukraine?

 

Answer: Yes.  On September 23, G7 Leaders issued a statement condemning Russia’s sham referenda and noting their collective readiness to impose further economic costs on Russia and on individuals and entities both inside and outside of Russia that provide political or economic support for Russia’s illegal attempts to change the status of Ukrainian territory.

 

The United States is prepared to more aggressively use its authorities under existing U.S. sanctions programs to target such persons whose activities may constitute material assistance, sponsorship, financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to, or in support of (together “material support”), sanctioned persons or sanctionable activity.  Particular areas of targeting focus include entities and individuals in jurisdictions outside Russia that provide political or economic support for Russia’s illegal attempt to annex Ukrainian sovereign territory.  Examples of activities that could be targeted include those related to:

  • Providing material support for the organization of Russia’s sham referenda or annexation, as well as economic or other activity that seeks to legitimize Russia’s sham referenda or annexation;
  • Providing material support to Russia’s military and defense industrial base, including significant transactions by entities in third countries that provide material support to Russia’s military, defense industrial base, and designated entities and persons operating in Russia’s defense industrial base;
  • Attempting to circumvent or evade U.S. sanctions on Russia and Belarus; and
  • Providing material support to Russian entities or individuals subject to certain blocking sanctions.

 

Multiple Executive Orders (E.O.) — including E.O.s 13660, 14024, and 14065 — authorize the imposition of blocking sanctions on categories of persons — inside or outside Russia — who provide material support for Russia following its sham referenda, purported annexation, and continued occupation of the Kherson, Zaporizhzhya, Donetsk, and Luhansk regions of Ukraine.

 

U.S. sanctions are not designed to target Ukraine or the Ukrainian people, including those living in areas occupied or purportedly annexed by Russia.  In addition, as noted in OFAC’s Fact Sheet: Preserving Agricultural Trade, Access to Communication, and Other Support to Those Impacted by Russia’s War Against Ukraine and Frequently Asked Question (FAQ) 1007, OFAC sanctions do not target transactions related to the export of food or medicine, the response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the official business of an international organization, or the activities of nongovernmental organizations, as well as personal remittances, telecommunications, internet services, or mail.

Finally, OFAC sanctions do not prohibit transactions related to the sale of or transport of crude oil; petroleum; petroleum fuels, oils, and products of their distillation; liquefied natural gas; coal; and coal products of Russian Federation origin, aside from the importation of such products into the United States.  OFAC will generally not impose sanctions on non-U.S. persons that engage in transactions that would be authorized for U.S. persons.  For additional information, please see Russia-related General License (GL) 8C, FAQ 980, and FAQ 1018.  OFAC has issued preliminary guidance on the planned maritime services policy and related price exception for seaborne Russian oil and intends to issue additional guidance in the coming weeks.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/1091

 

*******

 

September 30, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing "Sanctions Compliance Guidance for Instant Payment Systems,” which emphasizes the importance of taking a risk-based approach to managing sanctions risks in the context of new payment technologies such as instant payment systems and to highlight considerations relevant to managing those risks.  This guidance also encourages developers of instant payment systems to incorporate sanctions compliance considerations and features as they develop these systems.

 

See the following link for guidance:

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/instant_payment_systems_compliance_guidance_brochure.pdf

 

OFAC is also reissuing in their entirety the Libyan Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR 570, which were previously published in abbreviated form in 2011.  This reissuance of the Libyan Sanctions Regulations includes additional interpretive guidance and definitions, general licenses, and other regulatory provisions that will provide further guidance to the public.

 

The Libyan Sanctions Regulations can be found at the following link:

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/20220930_libya_regulations_0.pdf

 

Fines and Penalties

 

September 7, 2022: The Department of Justice announced that Instec Inc. (Instec), located in Boulder, Colorado, and Dr. Zhong Zou, Instec’s owner, and president, has agreed to pay $625,000 to resolve allegations that the company and Zou violated the False Claims Act by failing to comply with the requirements of the Buy American Act (BAA) when selling scientific instruments to federal agencies and national laboratories.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/colorado-company-and-owner-agree-pay-625000-alleged-false-claims-related-buy-american-act

 

*******

 

September 26, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced a settlement with CA Indosuez Switzerland S.A. (“CAIS”), an indirect subsidiary of Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank located in Switzerland that specializes in wealth management and corporate and investment banking.  CAIS agreed to remit $720,258 to settle its potential civil liability for apparent violations of sanctions against Cuba, Ukraine-related, Iran, Sudan, and Syria.  CAIS operated U.S. dollar (USD) banking and securities accounts on behalf of 17 individual customers located in sanctioned jurisdictions and conducted USD business on behalf of these customers through the U.S. financial system, including through U.S. correspondent banks and the U.S. registered brokers or dealers in securities.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/20220926_CAIS.pdf

 

*******

 

September 26, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced a settlement with CFM Indosuez Wealth (“CFM”), an indirect subsidiary of Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank located in Monaco that specializes in wealth management and corporate and investment banking.  CFM agreed to remit $401,039 to settle its potential civil liability for apparent violations of sanctions against Cuba, Iran, and Syria.  CFM operated U.S. dollar (USD) banking and securities accounts on behalf of 11 individual customers located in sanctioned jurisdictions and conducted USD business on behalf of these customers through the U.S. financial system, including through U.S. correspondent banks and the U.S. registered brokers or dealers in securities.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/20220926_CFM.pdf

 

*******

 

September 27, 2022: A federal jury convicted Ji Chaoqun, 31, of Chicago, a Chinese national and former Army Reservist, yesterday for acting within the United States as an illegal agent of the People’s Republic of China.

 

According to court documents and evidence presented at trial, Ji was found guilty on one count of conspiracy to act as an agent of a foreign government, specifically the People’s Republic of China, without first notifying the Attorney General; one count of acting as an agent of the People’s Republic of China without first notifying the Attorney General; and one count of making a material false statement to the U.S. Army. The jury acquitted Ji on two counts of wire fraud.

 

Evidence presented at the two-week trial revealed that Ji worked at the direction of a high-level intelligence officer in the Jiangsu Province Ministry of State Security (JSSD), a provincial department of the Ministry of State Security for the People’s Republic of China. Ji, a Chinese citizen residing in Chicago, was tasked with providing the intelligence officer with biographical information on certain individuals for possible recruitment by the JSSD. The individuals included Chinese nationals who were working as engineers and scientists in the United States, some of whom were U.S. defense contractors.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-army-reservist-convicted-acting-within-united-states-unregistered-agent-people-s

 

*******

 

September 29, 2022: Jareh Sebastian Dalke, 30, of Colorado Springs, made his initial appearance in federal court on charges that he attempted to transmit classified National Defense Information (NDI) to a representative of a foreign government.

 

Dalke was an employee of the National Security Agency (NSA) where he served as an Information Systems Security Designer from June 6, 2022, to July 1, 2022. According to the affidavit in support of the criminal complaint, between August and September 2022, Dalke used an encrypted email account to transmit excerpts of three classified documents he had obtained during his employment to an individual Dalke believed to be working for a foreign government. In actuality, that person was an undercover FBI agent. Dalke subsequently arranged to transfer additional classified information in his possession to the undercover FBI agent at a location in Denver, Colorado. The FBI arrested Dalke on Sept. 28 after Dalke arrived at the specified location.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-nsa-employee-arrested-espionage-related-charges

 

*******

 

September 30, 2022: OFAC announced a settlement with Tango Card, Inc. (Tango Card), a Seattle, Washington-based company that supplies and distributes electronic rewards.  Tango Card agreed to remit $116,048.60 to settle its potential civil liability for 27,720 apparent violations of multiple U.S. sanctions programs.  As a result of deficient geolocation identification processes, Tango Card transmitted stored value products to individuals with Internet Protocol (IP) and email addresses associated with Cuba, Iran, Syria, North Korea, and the Crimea region of Ukraine.  The settlement amount reflects OFAC’s determination that Tango Card’s apparent violations were non-egregious and voluntarily self-disclosed.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/20220930_tango_card.pdf

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SEPTEMBER 2022 EXPORT CONTROL REGULATION UPDATES Read More »

AUGUST 2022 EXPORT CONTROL REGULATION UPDATES

This newsletter is a listing of the latest changes in export control regulations through August 31, 2022.  The newsletter is provided as a complimentary service to assist exporters with their ITAR and EAR export compliance responsibilities. It provides a summary of recent changes to export control regulations or other regulatory matters of interest that may impact your company’s international trade and export compliance functions. Call us at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net with questions or comments.

 

See also our “Latest Sanctions Fines & Penalties” section below for an update on companies and persons denied export privileges by the United States Government.

 

REGULATORY UPDATES

 

The President

 

President Biden Continues The Export Administration Act Of 1979 For 1 Year

 

August 5, 2022: Fed. Reg. 48077: President Biden has determined that the national emergency declared on August 17, 2001, must continue in effect beyond August 17, 2022, as the implementation of certain sanctions authorities, including sections 11A, 11B, and 11C of such Export Administration Act of 1979, consistent with section 1766(b) of Public Law 115-232, the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4801 note), is to be carried out under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Thus, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), the President has continued for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13222, as amended by Executive Order 13637 of March 8, 2013.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/08/05/2022-17049/continuation-of-the-national-emergency-with-respect-to-export-control-regulations

 

*******

 

Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC)

 

DDTC Name And Address Changes Posted To Website

 

August 8 through 29, 2022: The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) posted the following name and/or address changes on its website at    

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_kb_article_page&sys_id=bd72ca0adbf8d30044f9ff621f961981:

  • Change in Name for JENOPTIK Advanced Systems GmbH to VINCORION Advanced Systems GmbH due to acquisition;
  • Change in Name and Ownership for Oasis Systems, LLC to Engineering Research and Consulting, LLC due to acquisition;
  • Change in Name for Hawker Pacific NZ Limited to Jet Aviation NZ Limited due to corporate rebranding;
  • Change in Name and Ownership for Triumph Aerospace, Inc. and its subsidiaries, due to acquisition:
Old Name New Name
Triumph Group, Inc. Radius Aerospace, Inc.
Triumph Fabrications – Fort Worth, Inc. Radius Aerospace – Fort Worth, Inc.
Triumph Fabrications – San Diego, Inc. Radius Aerospace – San Diego, Inc.
  • Change in Name for Hawker Pacific Asia Pte Ltd to Jet Aviation (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd due to corporate rebranding;
  • Change in Name for RUAG Australia Pty Ltd at C/o Finlaysons, Level 7, 43 Franklin Street, Adelaide, SA 5000 Australia to Rosebank Engineering Pty Ltd at 836 Mountain Highway, Bayswater, 3153 Victoria, Australia due to corporate rebranding;
  • Change in Address for Ametrine, Inc., 1007 North Orange Street, 4th Floor, Wilmington, Delaware 19801 to Ametrine, Inc. at 900 E Old Settlers Blvd, Suite 300, Round Rock, Texas 78664;
  • Change in Name for Jeppesen Poland Sp. z.o.o. to Boeing Poland Sp. z.o.o. due to corporate rebranding;
  • Change in Name for Hawker Pacific Asia Pte Ltd (Philippines Branch) to Jet Aviation (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd (Philippines Branch) due to corporate rebranding;
  • Change in Name and Ownership for Progeny Systems Corporation to Progeny Systems, LLC due to acquisition by General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.;
  • Change in Name and Ownership for JENOPTIK Power Systems GmbH to VINCORION Power Systems GmbH due to acquisition;
  • Change in Name for Wärtsilä Defense, Inc. to Defense Maritime Solutions, Inc., due to corporate rebranding;
  • Change in Address for Avanade Spain S.L.U., Paseo de Gracia 11, 08007 Barcelona, Spain to Avanade Spain S.L.U. at Passeig Saint Gervasi n 51, planta 4, modulo B, 08022 Barcelona, Spain;
  • Change in Name for BAE Systems (International) Limited – Japan or BAE Systems (International) Limited Japan to BAE Systems Japan GK due to corporate rebranding;
  • Change in Address for STACATO LLC, 192 Halpine Road, Apt 3401, Rockville, MD 20852 to STACATO LLC, 12300 Carroll Ave., Rockville, MD 20852;
  • Change in Name and Ownership for Emirates Advanced Investments Group, LLC to Aerospace Investment Company due to acquisition by Aerospace Investment Company;
  • Change in Name for Airbus Operations GmbH and Premium AEROTEC GmbH to Airbus Aerostructures GmbH due to corporate reorganization;
  • Change in Address for Aero Precision Industries, Inc. at 2525 Collier Canyon Rd., Livermore, CA 94551 to 15501 SW 29th Street, Suite 101, Miramar, FL 33027;
  • Change in Address for General Dynamics Land Systems – Force Protection Inc. at 9801 Highway 78 Ladson, South Carolina 29456 to Edgefield Test Center, 2055 US Highway 25 N Edgefield, South Carolina 29824;
  • Change in Address for General Dynamics Land Systems – Australia Pty. Ltd. at 26 Williams Circuit, Pooraka, South Australia 5095, Australia to 01A, Innovation House, 50 Mawson Lakes Boulevard, Mawson Lakes, South Australia 5095, Australia.

 

 

*******

 

DDTC Final CJ Determinations Posted To Website

 

Editors note: To our readers, we have added recent Commodity Jurisdiction (CJ) determinations to our newsletter. We believe some readers will find the government determinations enlightening.

 

June 8, 2022 through July 5, 2022: The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) posted the following Final CJ Determinations on its website at: https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_kb_article_page&sys_id=6ea6afdcdbc36300529d368d7c96194b

 

Model Name Description Final Determination Date Final Determination Applicant
Palledrone-MX, Model Number MX01-0122, Part Number DMX22 Palledrone-MX, a heavy-lift drone designed to carry large payloads (up to 100 pounds) for up to 30 miles that is operated from a ground station laptop using open-source mission planning software 2022-07-05 Seek CCATS Rotor-X LLC
X-59 Quiet Supersonic Technology Low-Boom Flight Demonstrator, and Parts, Components, Accessories, Attachments, and Systems Therefor A U.S. government technology demonstrator, part of a research project to conduct flight validation of design tools and technologies applicable to low sonic boom aircraft in order to advance supersonic civilian passenger flight; the X-59's constituent elements, including its engine 2022-07-05 USML Category XIX(a)(1) and (f)(1) – engine and specially designed parts, components, accessories, and attachments CCL ECCN 9A991.b – X-59 aircraft RWA - other X-59 parts, components, accessories, attachments, and systems Lockheed Martin Corp
Perimeter Surveillance Radar Software Version PSR EC and UC Perimeter surveillance software that enables connections between radars described on the USML and a computer to list radar contacts, as well as their precise speed and location 2022-06-24 USML Category XI(d) Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
Coil Form (Bobbin), Part Number 408246 A rigid plastic spool consisting of a tubular body with two round flanges at either end of the tube 2022-06-24 EAR99 Cosmo Plastics Co
Haven Retriever, Part Number 01 A spacecraft under development that can autonomously detect and track other satellites in real time using imaging, infrared, radar, or laser systems 2022-06-24 USML Category XV(a)(2) In Orbit Aerospace Inc
M1 Hardware Portal, Version 1 A standardized communication protocol, agnostic to the equipment it is connected to, that enables improved efficiency in facility management through smart hardware and robotics 2022-06-23 EAR99 Service Robotics & Technologies
High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV), Model Number M1025, Serial Number 013471 HMMWV that is designed to be an armament carrier and is based on the M966 TOW Missile HMMWV variant 2022-06-21 USML Category VII(b) Kenvas, Inc
Bus Defender with General Integrated Circuit and Bus Defender with Application Specific Integrated Circuit Hardware and firmware deployed in-line with a 1553 data bus to detect and block attacks 2022-06-21 Seek CCATS Peraton Corp
Software and Technology for Vericut Verification, Vericut Composites, and Vericut Drilling and Fastening Software and technology that simulates Computer Numerical Control (CNC) of manufacturing equipment to provide confidence that valuable resources will not be wasted in the manufacturing process 2022-06-21 USML when customized to simulate defense article production equipment or tooling (e.g., the technical data paragraphs for the following USML categories: VI(f)(5), XIII(k)(1), XVI(d), or XX(c)); otherwise, EAR99 CGTech
Media Swivel Rotary Joint (Two Channel Coolant and Two Channel Air), Part Number P770HP-2/2HANS1 A device for transferring cooling fluids and cooling air between the base of a radar station and its rotating antenna 2022-06-21 USML Category XII(e)(1) United Equipment Accessories, Inc
Fusion Imaging Monocular AGM F14, Models AP and APW, Part Numbers 7152521111012F14 and 7152521121012F14 Thermal imaging and night vision devices 2022-06-13 USML Category XII(c)(1)(ii) AGM Global Vision LLC
TAKBox System, Model Revision A, Part Number MST-000048-000 i A rugged field-case desktop computer with peripherals in a pelican case that includes interfaces to connect to power, USB, and Ethernet 2022-06-08 Seek CCATS Human Systems Integration, Inc.

 

*******

 

Effective September 6, 2022, All DECCS Applications Will Reflect Revised ITAR Citations

 

August 29, 2022: The U.S. Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) announced that its website and the Defense Export Control and Compliance System (DECCS) application are being updated with the new ITAR citations to reflect regulatory changes taking effect on Sept. 6, 2022, as a result of the ITAR Reorganization Rule 1 (87 FR 16396, Mar. 23, 2022). Updates are being made on a rolling basis. As DDTC updates its web pages, some ITAR references on the website may be temporarily outdated. DDTC expects these changes to be completed and updated no later than September 9th.  Effective September 6, all DECCS applications (Registration, Licensing, Advisory Opinions, and Commodity Jurisdictions) will reflect the revised ITAR citations.

 

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_public_portal_news_and_events

 

Editors Note: The revised citations for definitions in the ITAR Part 120 will create requirements for the update of training programs, compliance plans, manuals and procedures, which should be updated as soon as possible.

 

*******

 

U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry & Security

 

BIS Issued An Interim Final Rule That Establishes New Export Controls On Four Technologies That Meet The Criteria For Emerging And Foundational Technologies

 

August 12, 2022: The Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued an interim final rule that establishes new export controls on four technologies that meet the criteria for emerging and foundational technologies under Section 1758 of the Export Control Reform Act (ECRA) and are essential to the national security of the United States. These Section 1758 technologies support the production of advanced semiconductors and gas turbine engines. These four technologies are among the items that the 42 Participating States of the Wassenaar Arrangement reached a consensus to control at the December 2021 Plenary. The United States additionally controls a wider range of technologies, including additional equipment, software, and technology used to produce semiconductors, beyond the items agreed upon in the Wassenaar Arrangement.

 

The four technologies covered by the rule include two substrates of ultra-wide bandgap semiconductors: Gallium Oxide (Ga2O3), and diamond; Electronic Computer-Aided Design (ECAD) software specially designed for the development of integrated circuits with Gate-AllAround Field-Effect Transistor (GAAFET) structure; and Pressure Gain Combustion (PGC) technology.

 

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/about-bis/newsroom/press-releases/3116-2022-08-12-bis-press-release-wa-2021-1758-technologies-controls-rule/file

 

*******

 

U.S. Senate

 

Senator Rubio Calls For New Export Control Laws To Protect America’s National And Economic Security

 

August 18, 2022: U.S. Senator Marco Rubio called for new export control laws to protect America’s national and economic security due to a report that the U.S. Department of Commerce approves nearly every request to sell semiconductors, aerospace components, artificial intelligence assets, and other sensitive technologies to Chinese companies, according to an analysis of trade data conducted by the Wall Street Journal.

During last month’s debate over the $280 billion CHIPS and Science Act, Rubio criticized the lack of safeguards in the bill, specifically calling attention to the flexibility granted to Commerce to broaden the definition of “legacy chips.” The Journal’s new analysis suggests Commerce will continue to expand the type of semiconductors U.S. companies are allowed to produce in China.

https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2022/8/rubio-calls-for-new-export-control-laws and https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-approves-nearly-all-tech-exports-to-china-data-shows-11660596886

 

LATEST SANCTIONS FINES & PENALTIES

 

This section of our newsletter provides information on the latest sanctions, fines, and penalties for export violations or matters of non-compliance with the ITAR or EAR issued by the US government enforcement agencies. It is provided as a service to exporters and associates of FD Associates to remind them of the importance of extreme due diligence in all international trade and export compliance matters, particularly those involving exports subject to the ITAR or the EAR. Don't let this happen to you or your company! Call us with questions or concerns at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net.

 

Sanctions

 

The U.S. Department of State:

 

ODTC Posts Frequently Asked Questions Regarding New Temporary Open General Export Licenses 1 and 2

 

August 1, 2022: The U.S. Department of State, Office of Defense Trade Controls (ODTC) post Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding the two new temporary Open General Export Licenses that went into effect August 1, 2022.  See the following link to review the FAQs:

 

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_public_portal_faq_cat&topic=6acdbfe8db3bc30044f9ff621f96197e&subtopic=56bf93251b8159d0c6c3866ae54bcbd8#56bf93251b8159d0c6c3866ae54bcbd8

 

*******

Visa Restrictions Imposed By The Department of State

 

August 2, 2022: The United States is committed to working alongside our allies and partners to further impose severe consequences on President Putin and his enablers for Russia’s unconscionable war against Ukraine.

 

The Department of State imposed the following Visa restrictions:

  • Visa restrictions on 893 Russian Federation officials, including members of the Federation Council and members of Russia’s military, pursuant to a policy under Section 212(a)(3)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) that restricts visa issuance to those who are believed to have supported, been actively complicit in, or been responsible for ordering or otherwise directing or authorizing actions that threaten or violate the sovereignty, territorial integrity, or political independence of Ukraine.
  • Visa restrictions on 31 foreign government officials who have acted to support Russia’s purported annexation of the Crimea region of Ukraine pursuant to a policy under Section 212(a)(3)(C) of INA that restricts visa issuance to those who are believed to have supported, been actively complicit in, or been responsible for ordering or otherwise directing or authorizing actions that threaten or violate the sovereignty, territorial integrity, or political independence of Ukraine.

 

The Department of State designated the following Russian oligarchs, Dmitriy Pumpyanskiy, Andrey Melnichenko, And Alexander Ponomarenko.

 

The Department of State designated the following four individuals and one entity that are or are enabling illegitimate political leaders installed by Russia or its proxy forces to undermine political stability in Ukraine in support of Russia’s further invasion of Ukraine. The four individuals and the entity were designated pursuant to Section 1(a)(ii)(F) of E.O. 14024 for being responsible for or complicit in, or having directly or indirectly engaged or attempted to engage in, activities that undermine the peace, security, political stability, or territorial integrity of the United States, its allies, or its partners, for or on behalf of, or for the benefit of, directly or indirectly, the Government of the Russian Federation:

  • Salvation Committee For Peace And Order;
  • Kostyantyn Volodymyrovych Ivashchenko;
  • Volodymyr Vasilyovich Saldo;
  • Kyrylo Serhiyovych Stremousov; and
  • Sergey Vladimirovich Yeliseyev.

 

Pursuant to Section 1(a)(vii) of E.O. 14024, the Department of State designated Joint Stock Company State Transportation Leasing Company (JSC GTLK).

 

Pursuant to Section 1(a)(vii) of E.O. 14024, the Department of State designated the following four JSC GTLK subsidiaries for being owned or controlled by or having acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, JSC GTLK. These companies leased JSC GTLK’s transportation equipment outside of Russia and /or enabled JSC GTLK to access capital from western financial markets to fund its activities:

  • GTLK Europe Designated Activity Company;
  • GTLK Europe Capital Designated Activity Company;
  • GTLK Middle East Free Zone Company; and
  • GTLK Asia Limited.

 

Under the leadership of Russian President Vladimir Putin, the Russian Federation has systematically focused on exploiting high-technology research and innovations to advance Russia’s defense capabilities. Putin has also repeatedly underscored his concerns about Russia’s access to microelectronics.  Advanced technologies such as microelectronics are used in numerous weapon systems used by Russia’s military.  The Department of State imposed sanctions on numerous Russian high-technology entities as a part of the United States’ efforts to impose additional costs on Russia’s war machine, as follows:

 

  • Federal State Institution Of Higher Vocational Education Moscow Institute Of Physics And Technology (Moscow Institute Of Physics And Technology) (MIPT);
  • Skolkovo Foundation;
  • Skolkovo Institute Of Science And Technology (Skoltech) ;
  • Technopark Skolkovo Limited Liability Company;
  • Joint Stock Company Penzensky Nauchno Issledovatelsky Elektrotekhnichesky Higher Education Institution;
  • JSC Zelenograd Nanotechnology Center;
  • Joint Stock Company Institute Of Electronic Control Computers Named After I.S. Bruk;
  • Federal State Institution Federal Scientific Center Scientific Research Institute For System Analysis Of The Russian Academy Of Sciences;
  • Scientific And Production Association Of Measuring Equipment JSC;
  • Mitishinskiy Scientific Research Institute Of Radio Measuring Instruments;
  • Joint Stock Company Research Institute Of Electronic And Mechanical Devices;
  • JSC Svetlana Poluprovodniki;
  • Joint Stock Company Design Center Soyuz;
  • OJSC Scientific Research Institute Of Precision Mechanical Engineering;
  • Public Joint Stock Company Kremny;
  • Joint Stock Company Institute For Scientific Research Microelectronic Equipment Progress;
  • Joint Stock Company Voronezhsky Factory Poluprovodnikovykh Priborov Sborka;
  • Open Joint Stock Company Scientific And Production Enterprise Pulsar;
  • LLC Scientific Production Enterprise Digital Solutions;
  • Joint Stock Company Design Technology Center Elektronika;
  • Joint Stock Company Vologodsky Optiko Mekhanichesky Factory;
  • Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution Research And Production Complex Technology Center;
  • JSC Scientific Research Institute Submicron; and
  • Academician A.L. Mints Radiotechnical Institute Joint Stock Company.

 

https://www.state.gov/imposing-additional-costs-on-russia-for-its-continued-war-against-ukraine/

 

*******

 

August 10, 2022: 87 Fed Reg 48748: The U.S. Department of State, Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance pursuant to section 38(g)(4) of the AECA and section 127.7(b) and (c)(1) of the ITAR, denied export privileges and statutorily debarred the following ten individuals as of the date of this notice:

 

  • Awer, Akeem Shonari;
  • Cabalceta, Oben;
  • Camaj, Rrok Martin;
  • Guerra, Claudia;
  • Sin, Aydan;
  • Sobrado, Roger;
  • Wang, Shaohua;
  • Wang, Ye Sang;
  • Xie, Tuqiang; and
  • Zhang, Jian.

 

At the end of the three-year period following the date of this notice, the above-named persons remain debarred unless a request for reinstatement from statutory debarment is approved by the Department of State.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/08/10/2022-17123/bureau-of-political-military-affairs-statutory-debarment-under-the-arms-export-control-act-and-the

 

*******

 

Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

 

August 2, 2022: The U.S. Commerce Department, through its Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), updated its list of aircraft that have flown into Russia or Belarus in apparent violation of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by adding the first 25 foreign-produced aircraft that BIS has identified as apparently violating the EAR’s de minimis threshold for U.S. components. There are now a total of 183 aircraft identified on the list for apparent violations of U.S. export controls. Based on publicly available information, BIS has identified aircraft subject to the EAR flying from third countries to Russia (since March 2—see background on EAR restrictions below) or Belarus since April 8 (see background on EAR restrictions below), all of which are owned or controlled by, or under charter or lease to, Belarus, Russia, or Russian or Belarusian nationals. In addition to U.S.-origin aircraft, foreign-produced aircraft that exceed a de minimis amount – greater than 25 percent – of controlled U.S.-origin content by value are also subject to the EAR. As a result, BIS identified 25 foreign-produced aircraft that are subject to the EAR due to meeting this de minimis threshold that has apparently violated BIS’s stringent export controls on Russia. A complete list of the 183 aircraft identified on the list for apparent violations of U.S. export controls is included at the following link:

 

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/about-bis/newsroom/press-releases/3108-2022-08-02-bis-press-release-gp10-list-foreign-produced-de-minimis-additions/file

 

*******

 

August 24, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 51876: The Department of Commerce amended the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by adding seven entities under seven entries to the Entity List. These entities have been determined by the U.S. Government to be acting contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States and will be listed on the Entity List under the destination of the People’s Republic of China (China). The seven entities are:

 

  • China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) 9th Academy 771 Research Institute;
  • China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) 9th Academy 772 Research Institute;
  • China Academy of Space Technology 502 Research Institute;
  • China Academy of Space Technology 513 Research Institute;
  • China Electronics Technology Group Corporation 43 Research Institute;
  • China Electronics Technology Group Corporation 58 Research Institute; and
  • Zhuhai Orbita Control Systems.

 

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/federal-register-notices-1/3122-87-fr-51876-entity-list-rule-8-24-22/file

 

*******

 

August 24, 2022: The Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) denied the export privileges of the following individuals:

  • Aaron Abraham Villa (Mr. Villa) under the Export Administration Regulations for a period of five years from the date of Mr. Villa’s conviction on January 14, 2021, for violating 18 U.S.C. § 554(a). Specifically, Mr. Villa was convicted of knowingly and unlawfully concealing, buying, or facilitating the transportation and concealment or exportation of a Glock 21C .45 caliber Roni pistol conversion kit and magazines from the United States to Mexico, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 554. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Mr. Villa had an interest at the time of his conviction.

 

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/export-violations-2022/1388-e2737/file

 

  • Ronald Adjei Danso (Mr. Danso) under the Export Administration Regulations for a period of five years from the date of Danso’s conviction on September 15, 2020, for violating Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C § 2778) (AECA). Specifically, Mr. Danso was convicted of knowingly and willfully attempting to export from the United States to the Republic of Ghana 20 firearms, which are designated as defense articles on the United States Munitions List, without first obtaining from the Department of State a license for such export or written authorization. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Mr. Danso had an interest at the time of his conviction.

 

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/export-violations-2022/1389-e2738/file

 

  • Julio Cesar Vega-Amaral (Mr. Vega-Amaral) under the Export Administration Regulations for a period of seven years from the date of Mr. Vega-Amaral’s conviction on February 12, 2020, for violating 18 U.S.C. § 554(a). Specifically, Mr. Vega-Amaral was convicted of knowingly attempting to export and exporting, from the United States to Mexico, merchandise, articles, and objects, to wit: 4,325 live rounds of ammunition consisting of various calibers, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 554. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Mr. Vega-Amaral had an interest at the time of his conviction.

 

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/export-violations-2022/1390-e2739/file

 

  • Irina Morgovsky (Ms. Morgovsky) under the Export Administration Regulations for a period of 10 years from the date of Ms. Morgovsky’s conviction on October 31, 2018, for violating Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C § 2778) (AECA). Specifically, Ms. Morgovsky was convicted of, among other things, knowingly and willfully and intentionally conspiring to export components for the production of night-vision and thermal devices designated as defense articles on the United States Munitions List from the United States to Russia, without having first obtained from the Department of State a license for such export or written authorization for such export. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Ms. Morgovsky had an interest at the time of her conviction.

 

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/export-violations-2022/1391-e2740/file

 

  • Naum Morgovsky (Mr. Morgovsky) under the Export Administration Regulations for a period of 10 years from the date of Mr. Morgovsky’s conviction on November 13, 2018, for violating Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C § 2778) (AECA). Specifically, Mr. Morgovsky was convicted of, among other things, knowingly and willfully and intentionally conspiring to export components for the production of night-vision and thermal devices designated as defense articles on the United States Munitions List from the United States to Russia without having first obtained from the Department of State a license for such export or written authorization for such export. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Mr. Morgovsky had an interest at the time of her conviction.

 

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/export-violations-2022/1392-e2741/file

 

*******

 

Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

 

August 1, 2022:  The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) took action against companies used by Iran’s Persian Gulf Petrochemical Industry Commercial Co. (PGPICC), one of the nation’s largest petrochemical brokers to facilitate the sale of tens of millions of dollars worth of Iranian petroleum and petrochemical products from Iran to East Asia. PGPICC is a subsidiary of Iran’s petrochemical conglomerate Persian Gulf Petrochemical Industry Co. (PGPIC), which accounts for half of all of Iran’s total petrochemical exports. These actions are taken pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13846 and follows OFAC’s July 6, 2022, designation of an Iranian oil and petrochemical network selling Iranian petroleum and petrochemicals to purchasers in East Asia and the June 16, 2022, designation of international sanctions evasion network supporting Iranian petrochemical sales.

 

In a separate but related action, the Department of State also designated two entities that have engaged in the purchase, acquisition, sale, transport, or marketing of Iranian petroleum and petroleum products, including providing logistical support to the Iranian petroleum trade, pursuant to E.O. 13846.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Blue Cactus Heavy Equipment And Machinery Spare Parts Trading L.L.C. of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Farwell Canyon Hk Limited of China;
  • Golden Warrior Shipping Co. Limited of China;
  • Pioneer Shipmanagement PTE. LTD., of Singapore;
  • Pznfr Trading Limited of China;
  • Shekufei International Trading Co., Limited of China.

 

The following vessel has been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Glory Harvest (3FYH7) LPG Tanker Panama flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9143506.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0901 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220801

 

Editors Note: When booking sea freight transportation, be sure your freight forwarder is validating the vessels used to transport your freight against the U.S. Denied Parties List.

 

*******

 

August 2, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued Russia-related General License 40A, General License 43A, General License 47, General License 48, and General License 49. OFAC is also publishing three Frequently Asked Questions.

 

General License 40A: All transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the provision, exportation, or reexportation of goods, technology, or services to ensure the safety of civil aviation involving one or more of the blocked entities listed in the Annex to this general license and that are prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 are authorized, provided that:

(1) The aircraft is registered in a jurisdiction solely outside of the Russian Federation; and

(2) The goods, technology, or services that are provided, exported, or reexported are for use on aircraft operated solely for civil aviation purposes.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl40a.pdf

 

General License 43A: All transactions prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the divestment or transfer, or facilitation of the divestment or transfer, of debt or equity of Public Joint Stock Company Severstal (“Severstal”) or Nord Gold PLC (“Nord Gold”), or any entity in which Severstal or Nord Gold owns, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest, purchased prior to June 2, 2022 (“covered debt or equity”) to a non-U.S. person are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, August 31, 2022. Except as provided above, all transactions prohibited by E.O. 14024 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind down of derivative contracts entered into prior to June 2, 2022, that (i) include a blocked person described above as a counterparty or (ii) are linked to covered debt or equity are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, August 31, 2022, provided that any payments to a blocked person are made into a blocked account in accordance with the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR). U.S. financial institutions are authorized to unblock covered debt or equity that was blocked on or after June 2, 2022, but before June 28, 2022, provided that the unblocked covered debt or equity is solely used to effect transactions authorized above.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl43a.pdf

 

General License 47: All transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind-down of any transaction involving one or more of the following blocked persons that are prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, September 1, 2022, provided that any payment to a blocked person must be made into a blocked account in accordance with the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR):

(1) Skolkovo Foundation;

(2) Skolkovo Institute of Technology;

(3) Technopark Skolkovo Limited Liability Company;

(4) Federal State Institution of Higher Vocational Education Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology;

(5) Publichnoe Aktsionernoe Obschestvo Magnitogorskiy Metallurgicheskiy Kombinat;

(6) Joint Stock Company Government Transport Company; or

(7) Any entity in which one or more of the above persons own, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl47.pdf

 

General License 48: All transactions prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the divestment or transfer, or facilitation of the divestment or transfer, of debt or equity of one or more of the following entities purchased prior to August 2, 2022 (“covered debt or equity”) to a non-U.S. person are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, October 3, 2022: (i) Publichnoe Aktsionernoe Obschestvo Magnitogorskiy Metallurgicheskiy Kombinat;

(ii) Joint Stock Company Government Transport Company; or

(iii) Any entity in which one or more of the above entities own, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest.

 

All transactions prohibited by E.O. 14024 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to facilitating, clearing, and settling trades of covered debt or equity are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, October 31, 2022, provided that such trades were placed prior to 4:00 p.m. eastern daylight time, August 2, 2022.

 

All transactions prohibited by E.O. 14024 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind-down of derivative contracts entered into prior to August 2, 2022, that (i) include a blocked person described in paragraph (a) of this general license as a counterparty or (ii) are linked to covered debt or equity are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, October 3, 2022, provided that any payments to a blocked person are made into a blocked account in accordance with the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR).

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl48.pdf

 

General License 49: All transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind-down of any transaction involving MMK Metalurji Sanayi Ticaret Ve Liman Isletmeciligi Anonim Sirketi (MMK Metalurji), or any entity in which MMK Metalurji owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest, that are prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time, January 31, 2023, provided that any payment to a blocked person must be made into a blocked account in accordance with the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR).

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl49.pdf

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Guryev, Andrey Andreevich of Russia;
  • Guryev, Andrey Grigoryevich of Russia;
  • Ivashchenko, Kostyantyn Volodymyrovych of Ukraine;
  • Kabaeva, Alina Maratovna of Russia and Uzbekistan;
  • Melnichenko, Andrey Igorevich of Russia and Belarus;
  • Ponomarenko, Alexander Anatolevich of Russia, Ukraine, and Cyprus;
  • Popova, Natalya Valeryevna of Russia;
  • Pumpyanskiy, Dmitriy Aleksandrovich of Russia;
  • Saldo, Volodymyr Vasilyovich of the Ukraine;
  • Stremousov, Kyrylo Serhiyovych of Russia and the Ukraine;
  • Urusov, Anton Sergeevich of Russia;  and
  • Yeliseyev, Sergey Vladimirovich of Russia.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Academician A.L. Mints Radiotechnical Institute Joint Stock Company of Russia;
  • Dzhi Ai Invest OOO, of Russia;
  • Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution Research And Production Complex Technology Center of Russia;
  • Federal State Institution Federal Scientific Center Scientific Research Institute For System Analysis Of The Russian Academy Of Sciences of Russia;
  • Federal State Institution Of Higher Vocational Education Moscow Institute Of Physics And Technology of Russia;
  • GTLK Asia Limited of China;
  • GTLK Europe Capital Designated Activity Company of Ireland;
  • GTLK Europe Designated Activity Company of Ireland;
  • GTLK Middle East Free Zone Company of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Investitsionnaya Kompaniya Mmk-Finans of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Design Center Soyuz of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Design Technology Center Elektronika of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Institute For Scientific Research Microelectronic Equipment Progress of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Institute Of Electronic Control Computers of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Penzensky Nauchno Issledovatelsky Elektrotekhnichesky Higher Education Institution of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Promising Industrial And Infrastructure Technologies of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Research Institute Of Electronic And Mechanical Devices of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company State Transportation Leasing Company of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Vologodsky Optiko Mekhanichesky Factory of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Voronezhsky Factory Poluprovodnikovykh Priborov-Sborka of Russia;
  • JSC Scientific Research Institute Submicron of Russia;
  • JSC Svetlana Poluprovodniki of Russia;
  • JSC Zelenograd Nanotechnology Center of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company Active Business Consult of Russia;
  • LLC Scientific Production Enterprise Digital Solutions of Russia;
  • Mitishinskiy Scientific Research Institute Of Radio Measuring Instruments of Russia;
  • Mmk Metalurji Sanayi Ticaret Ve Liman Isletmeciligi Anonim Sirketi of Turkey;
  • OJSC Scientific Research Institute Of Precision Mechanical Engineering of Russia;
  • Open Joint Stock Company Scientific And Production Enterprise Pulsar of Russia;
  • Public Joint Stock Company Kremny of Russia;
  • Publichnoe Aktsionernoe Obschestvo Magnitogorskiy Metallurgicheskiy Kombinat of Russia;
  • Salvation Committee For Peace And Order of the Ukraine;
  • Scientific And Production Association Of Measuring Equipment JSC of Russia;
  • Skolkovo Foundation of Russia;
  • Skolkovo Institute Of Science And Technology of Russia; and
  • Technopark Skolkovo Limited Liability Company of Russia.

 

The following vessels have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Alfa Nero (ZCTL4) Yacht 2,159GRT Cayman Islands flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 1009376; and
  • Axioma (9HA3697) Yacht Malta flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9571143.

 

The following deletions have been made to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ACTIVE BUSINESS CONSULT of Russia;
  • "ABC LLC" of Russia; and
  • Limited Liability Company Activebusinesscollection of Russia.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220802

 

OFAC issued the following Frequently Asked Questions:

 

Question 1075: Is PhosAgro PJSC blocked as a result of the designation of Andrey Grigoryevich Guryev and Andrey Andreevich Guryev? 

 

Answer: No. OFAC has not designated PhosAgro PJSC and based on information available to OFAC, PhosAgro PJSC is not owned 50% or more by blocked persons or otherwise considered the blocked property of Andrey Grigoryevich Guryev and Andrey Andreevich Guryev.

 

As a general matter, agricultural and medical trade are not the target of sanctions imposed by the United States on Russia in response to its unprovoked and brutal war against Ukraine, and OFAC has issued General License 6B to authorize certain transactions prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations (RuHSR) related to agricultural commodities (including fertilizer), agricultural equipment, medicine, and medical devices, among other things.  For information on exemptions and authorizations pursuant to the RuHSR related to fertilizer and other agricultural commodities, please see “OFAC Food Security Fact Sheet: Russia Sanctions and Agricultural Trade” and “Fact Sheet: Preserving Agricultural Trade, Access to Communication, and Other Support to Those Impacted by Russia’s War Against Ukraine.”

Question 1074: Is EuroChem Group AG blocked as a result of the designation of Andrey Igorevich Melnichenko?

 

Answer: No. OFAC has not designated EuroChem Group AG and based on information available to OFAC, EuroChem Group AG is not owned 50% or more by blocked persons or otherwise considered the blocked property of Andrey Igorevich Melnichenko.

 

As a general matter, agricultural and medical trade are not the target of sanctions imposed by the United States on Russia in response to its unprovoked and brutal war against Ukraine, and OFAC has issued General License 6B to authorize certain transactions prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations (RuHSR) related to agricultural commodities (including fertilizer), agricultural equipment, medicine, and medical devices, among other things.  For information on exemptions and authorizations pursuant to the RuHSR related to fertilizer and other agricultural commodities, please see “OFAC Food Security Fact Sheet: Russia Sanctions and Agricultural Trade” and “Fact Sheet: Preserving Agricultural Trade, Access to Communication, and Other Support to Those Impacted by Russia’s War Against Ukraine.”

 

Question 1073: Is Sheremetyevo International Airport blocked as a result of the designation of Alexander Anatolevich Ponomarenko?

 

Answer: No.  OFAC has not designated Sheremetyevo International Airport and based on information available to OFAC, Sheremetyevo International Airport is not owned 50% or more by blocked persons or otherwise considered the blocked property of Alexander Anatolevich Ponomarenko.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/added/2022-08-02

 

*******

 

August 3, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) amended Russia-related General Licenses (GLs) 40A, 47, and 48, which were issued on August 2, 2022, to clarify that the licenses apply to Joint Stock Company State Transportation Leasing Company.  The August 2, 2022, GLs did not include the term ‘Leasing’ in the company’s name. The GLs are otherwise unchanged.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220803

 

*******

 

August 8, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned virtual currency mixer Tornado Cash, which has been used to launder more than $7 billion worth of virtual currency since its creation in 2019. This includes over $455 million stolen by the Lazarus Group, a Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) state-sponsored hacking group that was sanctioned by the U.S. in 2019, in the largest known virtual currency heist to date. Tornado Cash was subsequently used to launder more than $96 million of malicious cyber actors’ funds derived from the June 24, 2022, Harmony Bridge Heist and at least $7.8 million from the August 2, 2022, Nomad Heist. This action is being taken pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13694, as amended, and follows OFAC’s May 6, 2022 designation of virtual currency mixer Blender.io (Blender).

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0916

 

*******

 

August 15, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) updated its Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List per the Global Magnitsky Designations.

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Cephus, Sayma Syrenius of Liberia;
  • McGill, Nathaniel of Liberia; and
  • Twehway, Bill of Liberia.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220815

 

*******

 

August 25, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued Iran General License M-2, "Authorizing the Exportation of Certain Graduate Level Educational Services and Software". In addition, OFAC is amended one related Frequently Asked Question.

 

General License M-2:  Accredited graduate and undergraduate degree-granting academic institutions located in the United States (collectively, “U.S. academic institutions”), including their contractors, are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, September 1, 2023, to engage in the following activities with respect to Iranian students:

(1) Online Educational Services. The provision of online educational services related to graduate educational courses provided that the courses are the equivalent of courses ordinarily required for the completion of graduate degree programs in the humanities, social sciences, law, or business or are introductory science, technology, engineering, or mathematics courses ordinarily required for the completion of graduate degree programs in the humanities, social sciences, law, or business, and participation in all activities related to the provision of such online educational services to Iranian students.

(2) Exportation of Software. The exportation of software to Iranian students to facilitate participation in the activities authorized in this general license or (ii) paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of Iran General License G, provided such software is designated as EAR99 under the Export Administration Regulations, 15 CFR parts 730 through 774 (EAR), or constitutes information or software not subject to the EAR pursuant to 15 CFR § 734.3(b)(3).

 

Iranian students are individuals located in Iran or located outside Iran but who are ordinarily resident in Iran, who are eligible for non-immigrant classification under categories F (students) or M (non-academic students), and have been granted a non-immigrant visa by the U.S. State Department, but are not physically present in the United States due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/iran_glm2.pdf

 

OFAC updated the following Frequently Asked Question:

 

Question 853: Can U.S. academic institutions provide online learning services to Iranian students who are not physically present in the United States because of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic?  Can U.S. technology companies provide software and services to assist Iranian students in accessing online coursework?

 

Answer: General licenses issued under the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations (ITSR) authorize certain U.S. academic institutions and other U.S. persons to provide certain services and software to Iranian students.  These general licenses include:

 

  • General License G (GL G) authorizes accredited graduate and undergraduate degree-granting U.S. academic institutions, including their contractors, to export services to students located in Iran, or located outside of Iran but who are ordinarily resident in Iran (“Iranian students”), to sign up for and participate in certain undergraduate level online courses, notably:  (i) courses in the humanities, social sciences, law, or business that are the equivalent of courses ordinarily required for the completion of undergraduate degree programs in the humanities, social sciences, law, or business; and (ii) introductory undergraduate level science, technology, engineering, or mathematics courses ordinarily required for the completion of undergraduate degree programs in the humanities, social sciences, law, or business.  In addition, under Section 560.405 of the ITSR, certain transactions ordinarily incident to a licensed transaction are also authorized.  OFAC interprets Section 560.405 of the ITSR to authorize certain transactions ordinarily incident to courses authorized by GL G, including the giving of assignments and testing and grading of Iranian students.
  • General License M-2 (GL M-2) authorizes, on a time-limited basis, accredited graduate and undergraduate degree-granting U.S. academic institutions, including their contractors, to export additional services to those Iranian students who are eligible for non-immigrant classification under categories F (students) or M (non-academic students), and have been granted a nonimmigrant visa by the U.S. State Department, but are not physically present in the United States due to the COVID-19 pandemic.  Specifically, GL M-2 authorizes the provision of certain online educational services related to: educational courses that are (i) the equivalent of courses ordinarily required for the completion of graduate degree programs in the humanities, social sciences, law, or business; and (ii) introductory science, technology, engineering, or mathematics courses ordinarily required for the completion of graduate degree programs in the humanities, social sciences, law, or business.  OFAC interprets Section 560.405 of the ITSR to authorize certain transactions ordinarily incident to courses authorized by GL M-2, including the giving of assignments and testing and grading of Iranian students. GL M-2 also authorizes the exportation of certain software to facilitate the participation of certain Iranian students in certain online educational activities, as explained further below.  GL M-2 authorizes covered activities through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, September 1, 2023.
  • Section 560.540 of the ITSR and General License D-1 authorize the exportation to Iran of certain services and software incident to the exchange of personal communications over the Internet, such as instant messaging, chat and email, social networking, sharing of photos and movies, web browsing, and blogging.  OFAC interprets these authorizations to cover video conferencing software and related services, as well as educational technology software and related services, that allow students to view courses and course materials, complete tests and assignments, receive grades, participate in discussions, and other similar course-related online activity, provided that the software meets the additional criteria of the applicable authorization.  For more guidance on Section 560.540 of the ITSR and General License D-1, please see FAQs 337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 348, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, and 443.  In addition, GL M-2 also authorizes the exportation of certain software in order to facilitate participation in online educational activities described in GL G and GL M-2 by Iranian students who are eligible for non-immigrant classification under categories F (students) or M (non-academic students), and have been granted a nonimmigrant visa by the U.S. State Department, but are not physically present in the United States due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

 

To export services to Iranian students that fall outside of these authorizations, U.S. persons may apply for a specific license through the OFAC License Application Page.  OFAC is committed to mitigating the adverse impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and prioritizes the review of specific license applications to provide online learning services to Iranian students who are not physically present in the United States because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

*******

 

Fines and Penalties

 

August 8, 2022:  The United States of America has been authorized to seize an Airbus A319-100 (the “Airbus”) owned and controlled by sanctioned Russian oligarch Andrei Skoch, pursuant to a seizure warrant from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, which found that the airplane is subject to seizure and forfeiture based on probable cause of violation of the federal anti-money laundering laws.

 

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/united-states-obtains-warrant-seizure-airplane-sanctioned-russian-oligarch-andrei-skoch

 

*******

 

August 10, 2022:  Arif Ugur, 53, a former Cambridge man plead guilty in Boston in connection with his scheme to illegally export defense technical data to foreign nationals in Turkey for the fraudulent manufacturing of various United States military parts, in violation of the Arms Export Control Act. The U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) later determined that some of the parts were substandard and unsuitable for use by the military.

 

Mr. Ugur pleaded guilty to two counts of wire fraud, two counts of violating the Arms Export Control Act, and one count of conspiring to violate the Arms Export Control Act. Mr. Ugur was indicted on July 21, 2021.

 

https://www.justice.gov/usao-ma/pr/former-cambridge-man-pleads-guilty-wire-fraud-and-illegally-exporting-defense-articles

 

*******

 

August 26, 2022: The U.S. Department of State has concluded administrative settlements with Ryan Adams, Marc Baier, and Daniel Gericke, respectively, to resolve alleged violations of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA), 22 U.S.C. § 2751 et seq., and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), 22 C.F.R. Parts 120-130.  The Department of State and Mr. Adams, Mr. Baier, and Mr. Gericke have reached these settlements following an extensive compliance review by the Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance in the Department’s Bureau of Political-Military Affairs.

 

The administrative settlements between the Department of State and Mr. Adams, Mr. Baier, and Mr. Gericke, who are three former U.S. Intelligence operatives, pursuant to ITAR § 128.11, address the charge of unauthorized furnishing of defense services involving electronic systems, equipment, and software that were specially designed for intelligence purposes that collect, survey, monitor, exploit, analyze, or produce information from the electromagnetic spectrum to foreign persons in the United Arab Emirates. The three worked as cyber spies for the United Arab Emirates and admitted to hacking American networks that helped the UAE spy on human rights activists, journalists, and governments.

 

Under the terms of the Consent Agreements, Mr. Adams, Mr. Baier, and Mr. Gericke will be administratively debarred and thereby prohibited from participating directly or indirectly in any activities subject to the ITAR for three years.

 

https://www.state.gov/u-s-department-of-state-concludes-settlements-of-alleged-export-violations-by-ryan-adams-marc-baier-and-daniel-gericke/ and https://www.reuters.com/world/state-dept-concludes-settlements-with-ex-us-intel-operatives-who-worked-uae-2022-08-26/

 

*******

 

August 31, 2022: The United States obtained a warrant to seize a Boeing 737-7EM aircraft owned by PJSC LUKOIL, a Russian multinational oil and gas corporation headquartered in Moscow, Russia. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas authorized the seizure, finding probable cause that the Boeing aircraft was subject to seizure based on violations of federal law.

 

Earlier this year, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued sanctions against Russia in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The sanctions impose export controls and license requirements to protect U.S. national security and foreign policy interests. The Russia sanctions expanded prohibitions on the export, reexport, or in-country transfer of, among other things, U.S.-manufactured aircraft to or within Russia without a valid license or license exception.

 

According to court documents, LUKOIL owns the Boeing aircraft – bearing the tail number VP-CLR and the manufacturer serial number 34865 – which flew into and out of Russia in violation of the Department of Commerce’s sanctions against Russia.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/united-states-obtains-warrant-seizure-45-million-airplane-owned-russian-energy-company-pjsc

 

AUGUST 2022 EXPORT CONTROL REGULATION UPDATES Read More »

JULY 2022 EXPORT CONTROL REGULATION UPDATES

LATEST EXPORT CONTROLS AND COMPLIANCE UPDATE

JULY 2022

This newsletter is a listing of the latest changes in export control regulations through July 31, 2022.  The newsletter is provided as a complimentary service to assist exporters with their ITAR and EAR export compliance responsibilities. It provides a summary of recent changes to export control regulations or other regulatory matters of interest that may impact your company’s international trade and export compliance functions. Call us at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net with questions or comments.

 

See also our “Latest Sanctions Fines & Penalties” section below for an update on companies and persons denied export privileges by the United States Government.

 

REGULATORY UPDATES

 

The President

 

President Biden To Sign Directives Regarding Investment In Hypersonic Weapon Industrial Base

 

July 12, 2022: President Joe Biden is poised to sign two directives that would allow the U.S. Department of Defense to invest in its hypersonic weapons industrial base as adversaries demonstrate advanced capabilities. China and Russia’s recent progress in developing hypersonic weapons, which are unique in their ability to maneuver at speeds higher than Mach 5, has the Pentagon addressing potential supply chain disruption in key technology areas. Michael White, principal director for hypersonics in the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, said the presidential directives “about to be signed” would enable the Pentagon to invest Defense Production Act Title III funds to bolster hypersonic engine and guidance and control subsystem suppliers. Speaking during a virtual 12 Executive Mosaic forum on July 12, White said there are a number of different industrial base investment mechanisms being leveraged and enhanced for hypersonic activities. The DODs five-year spending plan for hypersonic programs is just under $25 billion for efforts ranging from early research to prototyping to fielding.

 

https://www.defensenews.com/2022/07/12/biden-to-sign-two-defense-production-act-directives-targeting-hypersonic-industrial-base/ and https://blog.executivebiz.com/government-contracting-event/event/ebiz-hypersonics-forum/

 

*******

 

Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC)

 

DDTC Name And Address Changes Posted To Website

 

July 8 through 12, 2022: The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) posted the following name and/or address changes on its website at    

 

 

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_kb_article_page&sys_id=bd72ca0adbf8d30044f9ff621f961981:

  • Change in Address for BAE Systems Australia Limited from Taranaki Road, Edinburgh Parks, Edinburgh SA 5111, Australia to Level 2, 80 Flinders Street, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia;
  • Change in Name from EDO MBM Technology Limited to L3Harris Release & Integrated Solutions Ltd. due to corporate rebranding; and
  • Change in Name from RUAG Australia Pty Ltd to Rosebank Engineering Pty Ltd due to corporate rebranding.

 

*******

 

The U.S. Department Of State Issued Two Temporary Open General Licenses

 

July 19, 2022: In an exciting development, DDTC has announced on July 19, 2022, the implementation of  pilot program that will provide foreign companies in the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada relief from obtaining Retransfer and Reexport authorizations for the transfer of defense articles in their possession by issuing two Temporary Open General Licenses (“OGEL”) pursuant to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (“ITAR”) and ITAR § 126.9(b). The OGELS will authorize the retransfer and reexport of previously authorized and exported defense articles and technical data to and within Australia, Canada and the UK. The Temporary OGELs go into effect on August 1, 2022 and expire one year later on July 31, 2023. DDTC is issuing these OGELs as part of a pilot program to assess the viability and appropriateness of the open general license concept.

 

OGEL 1 and OGEL 2 relate to ITAR-controlled defense articles and technical that were previously authorized for export from the U.S. pursuant to a valid license, agreement or other authorization and cannot be used as authorization for any exports from the U.S.

 

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_public_portal_news_and_events

 

*******

 

The U.S. Department Of State Will Accept Digital Signatures On TAAs, MLAs and WDAs

 

July 19, 2022: Based on a query from FD Associates, Inc., the U.S. Department of State, Office of Defense Trade Controls confirmed that signatories to a TAA, MLA, or WDA may use a digital signature, such as those provided by a third-party vendor (i.e., IdenTrust) who validates the identity of the individual to sign such documents.

 

*******

 

U.S. Department of Defense


The U.S. Department Of Defense Held An Industry Engagement Day Event For The Rapid Defense Experimentation Reserve

 

July 14, 2022: The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) held an Industry Engagement Day event for the Rapid Defense Experimentation Reserve (RDER) at Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory (JHU-APL) on July 26, 2022. RDER is an initiative to encourage prototyping and experimentation in pursuit of solutions to Joint problems. Components will propose experiments to be conducted in near-term Joint

 

exercises and compete for RDER funding. The Secretary will select among proposed experiments based on alignment to the Joint Warfighting Concept and the potential to yield demonstrable warfighting utility. The Industry Engagement Day was an opportunity for the industry to learn about the RDER effort’s vision, proposal cycle, technical priorities, capability challenges, and opportunities that require private-sector support. RDER will spearhead efforts to develop capabilities that support the joint warfighter, including, but not limited to, fires, command and control, logistics, and capabilities that will drive information advantage. These efforts will culminate with multi-competent experiments that combine multiple prototypes and capabilities to expeditiously explore new concepts and create new capabilities.

 

https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3092576/department-of-defense-announces-industry-engagement-day-for-the-rapid-defense-e/

 

*******

 

U.S. Census Bureau

 

The U.S. Census Bureau Posted Guidance On Response Code 66Q Being Upgraded From A Compliance Alert To A Fatal Error

 

July 7, 2022: Effective July 13, 2022, Response Code 66Q will be upgraded from “Compliance Alert” to “Fatal” in the Automated Export System (AES).  The Response Message 66Q was initially deployed on January 13, 2022 for exports filed under the license type “C33: No License Required (NLR)”.  When a filer selects License Type C33, they are subject to the terms, provisions, and conditions described in the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) in 15 CFR Parts 730-774.

Under the EAR, an item may require a BIS export license or license exception and may not be exported under the License Type C33 NLR depending on the reason for control of the ECCN and Country of Destination.  If a filer attempts to file Electronic Export Information (EEI) with an ECCN(s) and Country of Destination combination that is prohibited from being shipped under NLR, pursuant to the EAR, they will now receive the following AES generated Response Message:

Response Code: 66Q

Narrative Text: ECCN & CTRY OF DEST NOT ALLOWED FOR C33 (NLR)

Severity: FATAL

How to Address this Response Code:

Please review the accuracy of the reported ECCN, Country of Destination, and License Type (15 CFR Parts 730-774).  If inaccurate, please correct the appropriate fields and resubmit.  If all three fields are reported correctly, and this response code is still occurring, please email BIS at ECDOEXS@bis.doc.gov and inquire about the ECCN and additional licensing authorization that may be required.

 

Editors Note: This AES response has been implemented with exports to China and Russia in mind.

 

*******

 

 

New Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS), and HTS Codes Updated On July 1, 2022

 

July 11, 2022: The Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) and HTS Codes that are not valid for AES tables have been updated to accept the changes made on July 1, 2022. AES will accept shipments with outdated codes during a grace period of 30 days beyond the expiration date of June 30th, 2022Reporting an outdated code after the 30-day grace period will result in a fatal error. The ACE AESDirect program has been updated with the 2022 codes and will accept shipments with outdated codes during the grace period as well.

The 2022 Schedule B and HTS tables are available for downloading at:

http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/aes/documentlibrary/#concordance

The current list of HTS codes that are not valid for AES are available at:

http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/aes/documentlibrary/concordance/hts-not-for-aes.html

Editors Note: All company shipping departments should audit and validate the Schedule B and HTS codes they are using for exports and imports.      

 

*******

 

The U.S. Census Bureau Issued Tips On How To Resolve AES Response Messages

 

July 18, 2022: The U.S. Census Bureau issued tips on how to resolve AES Response Messages. When a shipment is filed in AES, a system response message is generated and indicates whether the shipment has been accepted or rejected.  If the shipment is accepted, the AES filer receives an Internal Transaction Number (ITN) as confirmation.  Though the shipment is accepted, the filer may still receive a Verify Message, Compliance Alert, Informational Message, or Warning Message along with their ITN.  However, if the shipment is rejected, a Fatal Error notification is received and must be corrected to receive a valid ITN.

To help exporters take the appropriate action for the different AES Response Messages, here are some tips on how to address the most frequent messages that were generated in AES for this month.

Fatal Error Response Code:  523

Narrative:          Schedule B/HTS Number Not Allowed for HH Goods

Severity:           Fatal

Reason:            When the Export Information Code is reported as HH for household goods, a Schedule  B/HTS Number is not allowed.

Resolution:  The Schedule B/HTS Number is not allowed to be reported when the Export Information Code is HH for household goods.

 

 

Verify the Export Information Code and Schedule B/HTS Number combination, correct the shipment and resubmit.

Response Code:  105

Narrative:          Mode of Transportation Unknown

Severity:           Fatal

Reason:             The Mode of Transportation Code reported is not valid in AES.

Resolution:       The Mode of Transportation Code reported must be one recognized in AES and listed in the ‘Appendix T, Mode of Transportation Codes’.

Verify the Mode of Transportation Code, correct the shipment and resubmit.

 

It is important that AES filers correct Fatal Errors as soon as they are received in order to comply with the Foreign Trade Regulations. These errors must be corrected prior to export for shipments filed pre-departure and as soon as possible for shipments filed post departure but not later than five calendar days after departure.

 

https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USCENSUS/bulletins/318572f

 

*******

 

U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

 

OFAC Advised Holders Of Blocked Property To Provide OFAC With A List Of Blocked Property Held By September 30th

 

July 1, 2022:  Pursuant to 31 C.F.R. § 501.603 the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) advises the Reporting, Procedures and Penalties Regulations (RPPR) requires holders of blocked property to provide the OFAC with a comprehensive list of all blocked property held as of June 30 of the current year by September 30.  Persons that do not hold blocked property as of June 30 do not need to file an Annual Report of Blocked Property (ARBP).  Please note that the term blocked property only applies to property that is blocked pursuant to OFAC regulations.  Property that was unblocked by an OFAC general or specific license or was previously blocked pursuant to a sanctions program that was terminated on or before June 30, 2022, is not considered blocked property and should not be reported in the ARBP.  Similarly, a restricted account of a person ordinarily resident in Iran is not blocked and should not be reported to OFAC in the ARBP unless there is an interest in the account of a person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to an applicable sanctions authority.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220701

 

 

*******

 

 

The U.S. Department Of Treasury Published The Current List Of Countries Which Require Or May Require Participation In, Or Cooperation With, An International Boycott

 

July 7, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 39931: In accordance with section 999(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Department of the Treasury published the current list of countries that require or may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986). On the basis of the best information currently available to the Department of the Treasury, the following countries require or may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986):

  • Iraq;
  • Kuwait;
  • Lebanon;
  • Libya;
  • Qatar;
  • Saudi Arabia;
  • Syria; and
  • Yemen

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/07/05/2022-14192/list-of-countries-requiring-cooperation-with-an-international-boycott

 

Editors note: the list above does not reflect all boycotting countries. It is prudent for finance, contracts, and sales departments to be on the lookout for boycott requests.

LATEST SANCTIONS FINES & PENALTIES

 

This section of our newsletter provides information on the latest sanctions, fines and penalties for export violations or matters of non-compliance with the ITAR or EAR issued by the US government enforcement agencies. It is provided as a service to exporters and associates of FD Associates to remind them of the importance of extreme due diligence in all international trade and export compliance matters, particularly those involving exports subject to the ITAR or the EAR. Don't let this happen to you or your company! Call us with questions or concerns at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net.

 

Sanctions

 

The U.S. Department of State:

 

July 6, 2022: The Department of State is designating one Vietnam-based entity, Truong Phat Loc Shipping Trading JSC, for engaging in the shipment of petroleum products from Iran.  Truong Phat Loc Shipping Trading JSC served as the commercial and technical manager for a vessel that transported Iranian petroleum products.  The State Department is also designating one Singapore-based entity, Everwin Ship Management Pte. Ltd., which has engaged in the transport of Iranian petroleum products.  Everwin Ship Management Pte. Ltd. served as the technical manager for a vessel that transported Iranian petroleum products.  Additionally, the State Department is designating three Iran-based entities, Zagros Tarabaran-E Arya, Persian Gulf Star Oil Company, and East Ocean Rashin Shipping Co. Ltd., which have engaged in the sale and/or shipment of Iranian petroleum products.  Zagros Tarabaran-E Arya is a shipper

 

of Iranian petroleum products, while Persian Gulf Star Oil Company is the largest producer of gas condensate in Iran, and as such, has directly engaged in the production of Iranian petroleum products.  East Ocean Rashin Shipping Co. Ltd. is a port agent and freight forwarder of Iranian petroleum and petrochemical products. These actions are being taken pursuant to Executive Order 13846.

 

https://www.state.gov/targeting-irans-international-petroleum-trade/

 

 

*******

 

Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

 

July 8, 2022: The U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) denied the export privileges of Amilkar Murillo of Mexico for ten (10) years. Mr. Murillo was convicted of knowingly and unlawfully concealing, buying, or facilitating the transportation and concealment of any merchandise, article, and object, prior to exportation, knowing the same to be intended for exportation from the United States, a Taurus 9mm handgun with two magazines, a Taurus 40 caliber handgun with two magazines, a Ruger 9mm handgun with two magazines, a Smith & Wesson 9mm handgun with two magazines, a Glock 380 handgun with two magazines, a Smith & Wesson 40 caliber handgun with two magazines, and a box of .380 ammunition (20 rounds), all in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 554.

 

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/1381-e2731/file

 

*******

 

July 8, 2022: The U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) denied the export privileges of Jason Wayne Jarvis for five (5) years. Mr. Jarvis was convicted of attempting to sell and facilitate the transportation of firearms, silencers, a short-barreled rifle, and a destructive device prior to exportation, knowing them to be intended for exportation contrary to any law or regulation of the United States, all in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 554.

 

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/1380-e2730/file

 

*******

 

July 8, 2022: The U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) denied the export privileges of Usama Darwich Hamade for ten (10) years. Mr. Hamade was convicted of conspiring to export parts and technology from the United States to Lebanon, and specifically to Hizballah, for among other purposes, inclusion in unmanned aerial vehicles, without obtaining the required export licenses under the Export Administration Regulations or under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations.

 

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/1379-e2729/file

 

*******

 

July 8, 2022: The U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) denied the export privileges of Hassan Ali Moshir-Fatemi for ten (10) years. Mr. Moshir-Fatemi was convicted of knowingly and willfully conspiring and agreeing to export, reexport, and supply, and causing to be

 

exported, reexported, and supplied, directly and indirectly, goods and services from the United States to Iran; and engaging in transactions for the purpose of avoiding and evading the Iranian Transaction Sanctions Regulations, including financing and facilitating transactions by foreign persons where such transactions are prohibited by United States law, without having first obtained from the Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control, the required license or written authorization. As noted in his plea agreement, Mr. Moshir-Fatemi agreed to the imposition of a ten-year Denial Order in exchange for an agreement by BIS not to pursue administrative action against him.

 

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/1378-e2728/file

 

*******

 

July 18, 2022: The U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) denied the export privileges of Ismael Gomez, Jr. for ten (10) years. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Gomez had an interest at the time of his conviction. Mr. Gomez was convicted of fraudulently and knowingly exporting and sending or attempting to export and send from the United States to Mexico one thousand and ten (1,010) rounds of .223 caliber ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 554.

 

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/1383-e2733/file

 

*******

 

July 18, 2022: The U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) denied the export privileges of Scott Douglas Browning for seven (7) years. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Mr. Browning had an interest at the time of his conviction. Mr. Browning was convicted of willfully exporting and causing to be exported from the United States to the Netherlands defense articles, specifically Image Intensifier Generation 3 MX-10130, Image Intensifier Generation 3 MX-10160, Image Intensifier Generation 3 MX-11769, and the BAE Systems OASYS SkeetIR Micro Thermal Imaging Monocular 640x480, which are all designated as defense articles on the United States Munitions List, without having first obtained from the Department of State a license for such export or written authorization for such export. Browning was also placed on the Department of State’s debarred list.

 

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/1384-e2734/file

 

*******

 

July 19, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 42997: The U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) denied the export privileges of Joyce Marie Eliabachus (Eliabachus) for ten years based on her conviction of violating 18 U.S.C. 371. Specifically, Eliabachus was convicted of knowingly and intentionally conspiring and agreeing with others known and unknown to export, re-export, sell and supply and attempting to re-export, sell and supply aircraft components, directly or indirectly from the United States to Iran, including to Mahan Air, without first obtaining the authorization from the Office of Foreign Assets Control, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 371. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Eliabachus had an interest at the time of her conviction.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/07/19/2022-15322/in-the-matter-of-joyce-marie-eliabachus-17-frederick-st-morristown-nj-07960-order-denying-export

 

Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

 

July 6, 2022:  The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned an international network of individuals and entities that has used a web of Gulf-based front companies to facilitate the delivery and sale of hundreds of millions of dollars worth of Iranian petroleum and petrochemical products from Iranian companies to East Asia. These actions are taken pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13846 and follows OFAC’s June 16, 2022, designation of an international sanctions evasion network supporting Iranian petrochemical sales. Concurrently with OFAC’s designations, the Department of State imposed sanctions on five entities based in Iran, Vietnam, and Singapore and two vessels pursuant to E.O. 13846 in connection with significant transactions for the sale and transport of petroleum products from Iran, on or after November 5, 2018.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Rajabieslami, Morteza of Iran, Saint Kitts and Nevis and the United Kingdom;
  • Sanchuli, Mahdieh of Iran.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

  • Ali Almutawa Petroleum And Petrochemical Trading L.L.C. of the United Arab Emirates;
  • East Ocean Rashin Shipping Co of Iran;
  • Edgar Commercial Solutions FZE of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Emerald Global FZE of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Everwin Shipmanagement PTE. LTD., of Singapore;
  • Jam Petrochemical Company of Iran;
  • Lustro Industry Limited of China;
  • Oligei International Trading Co., Limited of China;
  • Persian Gulf Star Oil Company of Iran;
  • Petrogat FZE of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Petrokick LLC of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Truong Phat Loc Shipping Trading Joint Stock Company of Vietnam; and
  • Zagros Tarabaran-E Arya of Iran.

 

The following vessels have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

  • BS Bravo, Chemical/Oil Tanker Gabon flag (Truong Phat Loc Shipping Trading); Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9294795; and
  • Summer 5, Chemical/Oil Tanker Panama flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9204805.

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0851 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220706

 

*******

 

July 7, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is issuing Venezuela-Related General License 40A, "Authorizing Certain Transactions Involving the Exportation or Reexportation of Liquefied Petroleum Gas to Venezuela."

 

 

Venezuela-Related General License 40A: All transactions and activities related to the exportation or reexportation, directly or indirectly, of liquefied petroleum gas to Venezuela, involving the Government of Venezuela, Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PdVSA), or any entity in which PdVSA owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest, that are prohibited by E.O. 13850 of November 1, 2018, as amended by E.O. 13857 of January 25, 2019, or E.O. 13884 of August 5, 2019, each as incorporated into the Venezuela Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 591 (the VSR), are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, July 12, 2023.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/venezuela_gl40a.pdf

 

*******

 

July 11, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated an individual engaged in trafficking high-caliber firearms from the United States to one of Mexico’s most powerful drug organizations. OFAC designated Obed Christian Sepulveda Portillo (Obed Sepulveda) pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14059 for acting for or on behalf of the Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion (CJNG), a violent drug trafficking organization based in Mexico responsible for a significant proportion of fentanyl and other deadly drugs trafficked into the United States. Obed Sepulveda, a Mexican national, was designated for being directed by, or acting or purporting to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, CJNG. Obed Sepulveda coordinates the daily procurement of firearms and bulk ammunition from the U.S. southwest border into Mexico through a network of individuals working directly with CJNG. Obed Sepulveda was added to OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals List.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0855 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220711

 

*******

 

July 14, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is issuing Russia-related General License 6B, General License 25C, General License 30A, General License 44, and is publishing three amended Russia-related Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs). See the following link for a description of the amended FAQs:

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/updated/2022-07-14

 

OFAC is also publishing a Food Security Fact Sheet on "Russia Sanctions and Agricultural Trade." OFAC is issuing this Fact Sheet to further clarify that the United States has not imposed sanctions on the production, manufacturing, sale, or transport of agricultural commodities (including fertilizer), agricultural equipment, or medicine relating to the Russian Federation (Russia). In addition, OFAC has issued a broad general license (GL) to authorize certain transactions related to agricultural commodities, agricultural equipment, medicine, and medical devices, as described in more detail below. The United States strongly supports efforts by the United Nations to bring both Ukrainian and Russian grain to world markets and to reduce the impact of Russia’s unprovoked war on Ukraine on global food supplies and prices. The fact sheet can be found at the following link:

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_fact_sheet_20220714.pdf

 

 

 

General License 6B: All transactions prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587, (RuHSR),  related to (1) the production, manufacturing, sale, or transport of agricultural commodities, agricultural equipment, medicine, medical devices, replacement parts and components for medical devices, or software updates for medical devices; (2) the prevention, diagnosis, or treatment of COVID19 (including research or clinical studies relating to COVID-19); or (3) ongoing clinical trials and other medical research activities are authorized. (b) For the purposes of this general license, agricultural commodities, medicine, and medical devices are defined as follows:

(1) Agricultural commodities. For the purposes of this general license, agricultural commodities are products that fall within the term “agricultural commodity” as defined in section 102 of the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 (7 U.S.C. 5602) and are intended for use as: (i) Food for humans (including raw, processed, and packaged foods; live animals; vitamins and minerals; food additives or supplements; and bottled drinking water) or animals (including animal feeds); (ii) Seeds for food crops; (iii) Fertilizers or organic fertilizers; or (iv) Reproductive materials (such as live animals, fertilized eggs, embryos, and semen) for the production of food animals;

(2) Medicine. For the purposes of this general license, medicine is an item that falls within the definition of the term “drug” in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321); and

(3) Medical devices. For the purposes of this general license, a medical device is an item that falls within the definition of “device” in section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321).

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl6b.pdf

 

General License 25C: All transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the receipt or transmission of telecommunications involving the RuHSR are authorized. The exportation or reexportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, from the United States or by U.S. persons, wherever located, to the Russian Federation of services, software, hardware, or technology incident to the exchange of communications over the internet, such as instant messaging, videoconferencing, chat and email, social networking, sharing of photos, movies, and documents, web browsing, blogging, web hosting, and domain name registration services, that is prohibited by the RuHSR, is authorized.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl25c.pdf

 

General License 30A: All transactions involving SEFE Securing Energy for Europe GmbH (formerly known as Gazprom Germania GmbH), or any entity in which SEFE Securing Energy for Europe GmbH owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest that are prohibited by Directive 3 under Executive Order 14024, Prohibitions Related to New Debt and Equity of Certain Russia-related Entities, are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time, December 16, 2022.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl30a.pdf

 

General License 44: All transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, from the United States, or by a United States person, wherever located, of tax preparation or filing services to any individual who is a United States person located in the Russian Federation, which are prohibited by section 1(a)(ii) of Executive Order 14071, are authorized.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl44.pdf

 

The following deletions have been made to OFAC's SDN List:

  • Subsidiary Bank Alfa-Bank JSC of Russia; and
  • JSC SB Alfa Bank of Russia.

Bottom of Form

*******

 

July 21, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has issued a Finding of Violation (FOV) to MidFirst Bank (MidFirst) for violations of the Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferators Sanctions Regulations (WMDPSR). The violations related to MidFirst’s maintaining accounts for and processing of 34 payments on behalf of two individuals added to OFAC’s List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (the “SDN List”) for 14 days post-designation. The violations stemmed from MidFirst’s misunderstanding of the frequency of its vendor’s screening of new names added to the SDN List against its existing customer base. OFAC determined that the appropriate administrative action in this matter was a FOV in lieu of a civil monetary penalty. This FOV reaffirms that financial institutions should take a risk-based approach to sanctions compliance, including when implementing sanctions screening tools, and demonstrates the importance of ensuring the scope and capabilities of outsourced sanctions compliance services are consistent with the financial institution’s assessment of its exposure to sanctions risks.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/20220721_midfirst.pdf

 

*******

 

July 22, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued Russia-related General License 45 and General License 46. OFAC is also publishing two new Frequently Asked Questions and two amended Frequently Asked Questions.

 

General License 45: All transactions prohibited by section (1)(a)(i) of Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind down of financial contracts or other agreements that were entered into on or before June 6, 2022, and involve, or are linked to, debt or equity issued by an entity in the Russian Federation (“covered contracts”), are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, October 20, 2022. The transactions authorized by this general license include:

(1) the purchase by U.S. persons of debt or equity issued by an entity in the Russian Federation where that purchase is ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind down of covered contracts; and

(2) the facilitating, clearing, and settling of purchase by U.S. persons of debt or equity issued by an entity in the Russian Federation, where that purchase is ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind-down of covered contracts.

 

This general license does not authorize any transactions otherwise prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR), including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the RuHSR, unless separately authorized.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl45.pdf

 

General License 46: All transactions related to the establishment, administration, participation in, and execution of an auction process as announced by the EMEA Credit Derivatives Determination Committee (“the auction”) to settle credit derivative transactions with a reference entity of “the Russian Federation” and prohibited by section 1(a)(i) of Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 is authorized. Except as provided above, the purchase or receipt of debt obligations of the Russian Federation by U.S. persons prohibited by section 1(a)(i) of E.O. 14071 is authorized for the period beginning two business days prior to the announced date of the auction and ending eight business days after the conclusion of the auction. All transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to facilitating, clearing, and settling transactions authorized above that are prohibited by section 1(a)(i) of E.O. 14071 are authorized. This general license does not authorize any transactions otherwise prohibited by the RuHSR, including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the RuHSR, unless separately authorized.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl46.pdf

 

New Frequently Asked Questions:

 

Question 1072: What does Russia-related General License (GL) 46 authorize with respect to credit derivative transactions referencing “the Russian Federation”? 

 

Answer: Russia-related GL 46 authorizes transactions otherwise prohibited by section (1)(a)(i) of Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 related to the establishment, administration, participation in, and execution of an auction process, as announced by the EMEA Credit Derivatives Determination Committee, to settle credit derivative transactions with a reference entity of “the Russian Federation” (“the auction”).

 

Examples of transactions that may be related to the auction include the submission and acceptance of bids and offers and physical settlement requests by auction participants and their customers, or the delivery and acceptance of the Russian Federation debt obligations and corresponding settlement amounts.

To promote the proper functioning of such an auction, GL 46 also authorizes U.S. persons to purchase or receive Russian Federation debt obligations for the period beginning two business days prior to the announced date of the auction and ending eight business days after the conclusion of the auction.

GL 46 also authorizes financial institutions, among others, to facilitate, clear, and settle transactions authorized by GL 46, including the transfer to, or purchase or receipt by U.S. persons of Russian Federation debt obligations.  GL 46 does not require the clearance and settlement of such transactions to be completed within eight business days after the conclusion of the auction.  For example, a purchase by a U.S. person of Russian Federation debt obligations made on the seventh business day after the conclusion of the auction does not have to be settled or cleared by the eighth business day.  Accordingly, U.S. financial institutions may continue settling or clearing such transactions after the eighth business day following the conclusion of the auction.

 

Financial institutions processing transactions pursuant to GL 46 may reasonably rely upon the information available to them in the ordinary course of business for the purposes of assessing whether a transaction is authorized by GL 46, provided that the financial institution does not know or have reason to know that a transaction is not in compliance with GL 46.

 

Question 1071: Can I wind down financial contracts that may involve transactions prohibited pursuant to section (1)(a)(i) of Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 related to the purchase or receipt of debt or equity securities issued by an entity in the Russian Federation?

 

Answer: Through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, October 20, 2022, Russia-related General License (GL) 45 authorizes all transactions prohibited by section (1)(a)(i) of E.O. 14071 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind-down of financial contracts or other agreements that were entered into on or before June 6, 2022, and involve, or are linked to, debt or equity securities issued by an entity in the Russian Federation.

 

The authorized transactions include the purchase, or facilitating the purchase, by U.S. persons of debt or equity securities issued by an entity in the Russian Federation if that purchase is ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind-down of a financial contract or agreement entered into on or before June 6, 2022.  For example, U.S. persons may purchase securities issued by an entity in the Russian Federation in order to cover or close out a short position, per a securities lending agreement, if such agreement was entered into on or before June 6, 2022.  Please see FAQ 1054 for additional information on the scope of the prohibition in section 1(a)(i) of E.O. 14071, including permissible transactions related to the divestment or transfer of debt or equity securities to a non-U.S. person.

 

Note that Russia-related GL 46 separately authorizes transactions related to the settlement of credit derivative transactions referencing “the Russian Federation” via an auction process.  For further information, please see FAQ 1072.  GL 45 does not authorize any transactions involving blocked persons unless separately authorized.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/added/2022-07-22

 

See the following link for the amended FAQs:

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/updated/2022-07-22

 

*******

 

July 29, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) added the following individuals its Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list: 

  • Burlinova, Natalya Valeryevna of Russia; and
  • Ionov, Aleksandr Viktorovich of Russia.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

  • Anti-Globalization Movement Of Russia;
  • Center For Support And Development Of Public Initiative Creative Diplomacy of Russia;
  • Ionov Transkontinental, OOO of Russia; and
  • Stop-Imperialism Global Information Agency of Russia.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220729

 

Fines and Penalties

 

July 1, 2022: Kristopher Sean Matthews, aka Ali Jibreel, 36, of South Carolina, was sentenced to 20 years in prison, and Jaylyn Christopher Molina, aka Abdur Rahim, 24, of Cost, Texas, was sentenced to 18 years in prison for conspiring to provide material support to the designated foreign terrorist organization the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham/Syria (ISIS). According to court documents, since May 2019, Matthews conspired with Molina to provide services to ISIS by administering an encrypted, members-only chat group for persons who supported ISIS ideology; by collecting, generating, and disseminating pro-ISIS propaganda; and by disseminating firearms training materials and bomb-making instructions to each other and to other members of the chat group and others.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/men-sentenced-federal-prison-conspiring-provide-material-support-terrorists

 

*******

 

July 8, 2022: Aerojet Rocketdyne Inc., headquartered in El Segundo, California, has agreed to pay $9 million to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act by misrepresenting its compliance with cybersecurity requirements in certain federal government contracts, the Justice Department announced. Aerojet provides propulsion and power systems for launch vehicles, missiles and satellites, and other space vehicles to the Department of Defense, NASA, and other federal agencies. The settlement resolves a lawsuit filed and litigated by former Aerojet employee Brian Markus against Aerojet under the qui tam or whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act, which permit a private party (known as a relator) to file a lawsuit on behalf of the United States and receive a portion of any recovery. Mr. Markus and Aerojet reached a settlement of the case on the second day of trial. Mr. Markus will receive $2.61 million as his share of the False Claims Act recovery.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/aerojet-rocketdyne-agrees-pay-9-million-resolve-false-claims-act-allegations-cybersecurity

 

*******

 

July 8, 2022: The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld a lower court’s ruling dismissing a complaint from Federal Express Corporation (FedEx) and holding it liable for violating the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (ECRA) even though the common carrier had been completely unaware of its violation. On appeal, FedEx unsuccessfully argued the Department of Commerce’s strict liability interpretation of 15 C.F.R.  § 764.2(b) is ultra vires – a clear overstep of statutory authority. The Appeals Court strongly held that Commerce’s strict liability regime was permissible pursuant to the statutory text, circuit precedent, and judicial deference to the executive branch on national security and foreign policy matters.

 

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/fedex-held-liable-for-act-done-3316874/ and https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/D120DC56392651728525887900595C97/$file/20-5337-1954068.pdf

 

*******

 

July 11, 2022: Intertech Trading Corporation, an Atkinson, New Hampshire-based laboratory equipment distributor, plead guilty in federal court to 14 felony counts of failure to file export information on shipments to Russia and Ukraine. According to court documents and statements made in court, between 2015 and 2019, Intertech exported laboratory equipment to Russia, Ukraine, and elsewhere, falsely describing the nature and value of the exported items on the commercial invoices and shipping forms. In its plea agreement, Intertech admitted that it used false, innocuous descriptions such as “lamp for aquarium” or “spares for welding system,” rather than accurately identifying the sophisticated scientific equipment actually contained in the shipments. Intertech admitted that it drastically undervalued the shipments, thereby evading the requirement to file Electronic Export Information, which would have been reported to the

 

 

Departments of Commerce and Homeland Security. Intertech is scheduled to be sentenced on October 17, 2022.

 

https://www.justice.gov/usao-nh/pr/intertech-trading-corp-pleads-guilty-14-felonies-failure-file-export-information

 

*******

 

July 14, 2022: John “Mark” Leveritt, 62, a Texas military contractor, pleaded guilty to rigging bids on government contracts from at least May 2013 through April 2018. According to court documents, Leveritt conspired with others to rig bids on certain government contracts in order to give the false impression of competition and to secure government payments in excess of $17.5 million. The plea agreement detailed seven contracting bids that Leveritt and his co-conspirator rigged, which included work performed for the Red River Army Depot in Texarkana and the U.S. Contracting Command in Warren, Michigan. Leveritt also admitted to falsely representing himself to be an employee of one business so that he could obtain government contracts that were set aside for qualifying businesses that were required to be owned and operated by certain categories of minority, disadvantaged or disabled persons. In fact, the work for some of the contracts was performed by businesses that had not placed any bids. Leveritt also admitted to providing a government employee with: tickets to a 2011 World Series game; tickets to two college football games; two expense-paid family vacations to Las Vegas; donations to youth sports teams coached by the government employee; and approximately 100 meals at restaurants.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/military-contractor-pleads-guilty-rigging-bids-public-contracts-texas-and-michigan

 

*******

 

July 15, 2022: American Express National Bank (Amex), a subsidiary of American Express Company, which provides charge and credit card products and travel-related services to consumers and businesses, has agreed to a settlement with the Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)  and agreed to remit $430,500 to settle its potential civil liability for 214 apparent violations of OFAC’s Kingpin sanctions. Over the course of two months, Amex processed transactions for an account whose supplemental card holder was designated in connection with illegal drug distribution and money laundering. A combination of human error and sanctions compliance program deficiencies enabled the account to engage in $155,189.42 worth of transactions. The settlement amount reflects OFAC’s determination that the apparent violations were not voluntarily self-disclosed and were non-egregious.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/20220715_amex.pdf

 

*******

 

July 26, 2022: Federal law enforcement officials announced that three indictments were unsealed in federal court, detailing charges against three men, two formerly of Northeast Ohio, who are believed to be currently residing in Lebanon. Named in the indictments are George Nakhle Ajaltouni, 47, formerly of North Olmsted; Jean Youssef Issa, 48, of Batroun, Lebanon; and Nakhle “Mike” Nader, 51, formerly of Cleveland.  Ajaltouni and Issa are charged for their roles in a scheme to smuggle and illegally ship firearms from Cleveland to Lebanon.  Nader is charged in a separate indictment with income tax evasion.

Jean Youssef Issa was recently arrested pursuant to a Red Notice issued by Interpol. The three indictments describe separate schemes, one involving Ajaltouni and Issa; one involving Ajaltouni alone; and the other solely concerning Nader. While the schemes are separate, it is believed that Ajaltouni and Nader are acquaintances and that the two men are currently residing near Batroun, Lebanon.  The indictments were originally filed between 2016 - 2019, and efforts to apprehend Ajaltouni and Nader remain ongoing.

 

https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndoh/pr/three-lebanon-charged-schemes-smuggle-weapons-cleveland-and-income-tax-evasion

 

 

JULY 2022 EXPORT CONTROL REGULATION UPDATES Read More »

The U.S. Department Of State, Office Of Defense Trade Controls Issues Two Temporary Open General Licenses That Will Assist Foreign Parties With Retransfers of U.S. Origin ITAR Defense Articles

In an extraordinary announcement announced on July 19, 2022, the U.S. Department of State, Office of Defense Trade Controls Licensing (“ODTCL”) has taken a proactive step in assisting foreign companies in the United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada by issuing two Temporary Open General Licenses (“OGEL”) pursuant to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (“ITAR”) and ITAR § 126.9(b) authority to authorize the retransfer and reexport of previously authorized and exported defense articles and technical data to and within Australia, Canada, and the UK.

These Temporary OGELs go into effect on August 1, 2022, and expire one year later on July 31, 2023. ODTCL is issuing these OGELs as part of a pilot program to assess the viability and appropriateness of the open general license concept.

OGEL 1 and OGEL 2 only relate to ITAR-controlled defense articles and technical data that were previously authorized for export from the U.S. pursuant to a valid license, agreement, or other authorization and cannot be used as authorization for any exports from the U.S.

 

 

OGEL 1 authorizes the retransfer[1] (as defined in § 120.51) of unclassified defense articles to:

  • The Government of Australia, the Government of Canada, or the Government of the United Kingdom;
  • Members of the Australian Community as defined in § 126.16(d)[2], at all locations in Australia;
  • Members of the United Kingdom Community as defined in § 126.l7(d)[3], at all locations in the United Kingdom; or
  • Canadian-registered persons as defined in § 126.5(b). [4]

 

OGEL 2 authorizes the reexport[5] (as defined in § 120.19) of unclassified defense articles and technical data between or among:

 

  • The Government of Australia, the Government of Canada, or the Government of the United Kingdom;
  • Members of the Australian Community as defined in § 126.16(d), at all locations in Australia;
  • Members of the United Kingdom Community as defined in § 126.l 7(d), at all locations in the United Kingdom; or
  • Canadian-registered persons as defined in § 126.5(b).

 

The retransfer pursuant to OGEL 1 and the reexport pursuant to OGEL 2 of any unclassified defense articles and technical data to any of the parties listed above for OGEL 1 and OGEL 2, is subject to all the following requirements, limitations, and provisos:

 

Requirements: The transferor shall:

  • Comply with the requirements of § 123.9(b)[6];
  • Maintain the following records for each retransfer/reexport: a description of the defense article, including technical data; the name and address of the recipient and the end-user, and other available contact information (e.g., telephone number and electronic mail address); the name of the natural person responsible for the transaction; the stated end use of the defense article; the date of the transaction; and the method of transfer;
  • Ensure that such records are available to ODTCL upon request; and
  • Utilize Open General License No. 1 or Open General License No. 2 as the license or other approval number or exemption citation on all records pertaining to transfer

 

Limitations and Provisos:

  • The defense articles and technical data to be retransferred/reexported were originally exported pursuant to a license or other approval issued by ODTCL pursuant to section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA), the Defense Trade Cooperation Treaty between the United States and Australia (§ 126.16), or the Defense Trade Cooperation Treaty between the United States and the United Kingdom, (§ 126.17);
  • A defense article or technical data originally exported pursuant to the ITAR’s Foreign Military Sales (“FMS”) exemption at § 126.6(c) may not be retransferred/reexported under OGEL 1 or OGEL 2;
  • Defense articles and technical data described in § 126.16(a)(5) or § 126. l 7(a)(5) may not be retransferred/reexported under OGEL 1 or OGEL 2;
  • Defense articles may not be retransferred under OGEL 1 or OGEL 2 if they are listed on the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) Annex or identified as Missile Technology (MT) on the United States Munitions List (USML) in § 121;
  • Defense articles may not be retransferred/reexported under OGEL 1 or OGEL 2 if they will be used to support the design, development, engineering, manufacture, production, assembly, testing, repair, maintenance, modification, operation, demilitarization, destruction, or processing of a missile, UAV, space-launch vehicle, item listed on the MTCR Annex, or item listed as MT on the USML in § 121;
  • Technical data may only be retransferred/reexported under OGEL 1 or OGEL 2 for the purpose of organizational-level, intermediate-level, or depot-level maintenance, repair, or storage of a defense article;
  • Any major defense equipment (as defined in § 120.8)[7] valued (in terms of its original acquisition cost) at $25,000,000 or more and any defense article or related training or other defense service valued (in terms of its original acquisition cost) at $100,000,000 or more, may only be retransferred/reexported under OGEL 1 or OGEL 2 for the purpose of: maintenance, repair, or overhaul defense services, including the repair of defense articles used in furnishing such services, if the retransfer/reexport will not result in any increase in the military capability of the defense articles and services to be maintained, repaired, or overhauled; or a temporary retransfer/reexport of defense articles for the sole purpose of receiving maintenance, repair, or overhaul;
  • The retransfer/reexport must take place wholly within the physical territory of Australia, Canada, or the United Kingdom;
  • Any retransfer/reexport of a defense article other than technical data is for end use by, or operation on behalf of, the Government of Australia, the Government of Canada, or the Government of the United Kingdom; and
  • OGEL 1 or OGEL 2 may not be utilized by persons to whom a presumption of denial is applied by ODTCL pursuant to §§ 120.l(c) or 127.l l(a), including, among other reasons, for past convictions of certain U.S. criminal statutes or because they are otherwise ineligible to contract with or receive an export or import license from an agency of the U.S. Government.

 

Information regarding OGEL 1 and OGEL 2 can be found on the Department of State’s website at:

 

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_public_portal_news_and_events

[1] (a) Retransfer, except as set forth in § 120.54, § 126.16 or § 126.17, means:

(1) A change in end use or end user, or a temporary transfer to a third party, of a defense article within the same foreign country; or

(2) A release of technical data to a foreign person who is a citizen or permanent resident of the country where the release or transfer takes place.

 

[2] (d) Australian Community.  For purposes of the exemption provided by this section, the Australian Community consists of:

(1) Government of Australia authorities with entities identified as members of the Approved Community through the DDTC Web site at the time of a transaction under this section; and

(2) The non-governmental Australian entities and facilities identified as members of the Approved Community through the DDTC Web site at the time of a transaction under this section; non-governmental Australian entities and facilities that become ineligible for such membership will be removed from the Australian Community.

 

[3] (d)[3] United Kingdom Community.  For purposes of the exemption provided by this section, the United Kingdom Community consists of:

(1) Her Majesty's Government entities and facilities identified as members of the Approved Community through the DDTC Web site at the time of a transaction under this section; and

(2) The non-governmental United Kingdom entities and facilities identified as members of the Approved Community through the DDTC Web site (www.pmddtc.state.gov) at the time of a transaction under this section; non-governmental United Kingdom entities and facilities that become ineligible for such membership will be removed from the United Kingdom Community.

 

[4] For purposes of this section, “Canadian-registered person” is any Canadian national (including Canadian business entities organized under the laws of Canada), a dual citizen of Canada and a third country other than a country listed in § 126.1 of this subchapter, and permanent resident registered in Canada in accordance with the Canadian Defense Production Act, and such other Canadian Crown Corporations identified by the Department of State in a list of such persons publicly available through the Internet website[4] of the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls and by other means.

 

[5] (a) Reexport, except as set forth in § 120.54, § 126.16, or § 126.17, means:

(1) An actual shipment or transmission of a defense article from one foreign country to another foreign country, including the sending or taking of a defense article to or from such countries in any manner;

(2) Releasing or otherwise transferring technical data to a foreign person who is a citizen or permanent resident of a country other than the foreign country where the release or transfer takes place (a “deemed reexport”); or

(3) Transferring registration, control, or ownership of any aircraft, vessel, or satellite subject to the ITAR between foreign persons.

(b)  Any release outside the United States of technical data to a foreign person is deemed to be a reexport to all countries in which the foreign person has held or holds citizenship or holds permanent residency.

 

[6] (b) The exporter, U.S. or foreign, must inform the end-user and all consignees that the defense articles being exported are subject to U.S. export laws and regulations as follows:

(1) The exporter must incorporate the following information as an integral part of the commercial invoice, whenever defense articles are to be shipped (exported in tangible form), retransferred (in tangible form), or reexported (in tangible form) pursuant to a license or other approval under this subchapter:

(i) The country of ultimate destination;

(ii) The end-user;

(iii) The license or other approval number or exemption citation; and

(iv) The following statement: “These items are controlled by the U.S. government and authorized for export only to the country of ultimate destination for use by the ultimate consignee or end-user(s) herein identified. They may not be resold, transferred, or otherwise disposed of, to any other country or to any person other than the authorized ultimate consignee or end-user(s), either in their original form or after being incorporated into other items, without first obtaining approval from the U.S. government or as otherwise authorized by U.S. law and regulations.”

 

[7] Pursuant to section 47(6) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2794(6)), major defense equipment means any item of significant military equipment (as defined in § 120.7) on the U.S. Munitions List having a nonrecurring research and development cost of more than $50,000,000 or a total production cost of more than $200,000,000.

 

The U.S. Department Of State, Office Of Defense Trade Controls Issues Two Temporary Open General Licenses That Will Assist Foreign Parties With Retransfers of U.S. Origin ITAR Defense Articles Read More »

JUNE 2022 EXPORT CONTROL REGULATION UPDATES

This newsletter is a listing of the latest changes in export control regulations through June 30, 2022.  The newsletter is provided as a complimentary service to assist exporters with their ITAR and EAR export compliance responsibilities. It provides a summary of recent changes to export control regulations or other regulatory matters of interest that may impact your company’s international trade and export compliance functions. Call us at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net with questions or comments.

 See also our “Latest Sanctions Fines & Penalties” section below for an update on companies and persons denied export privileges by the United States Government.

 

REGULATORY UPDATES

 

Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC)

 

DDTC Name And Address Changes Posted To Website

 

June 7 through 24, 2022: The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) posted the following name and/or address changes on its website at    

https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/ddtc_public?id=ddtc_kb_article_page&sys_id=bd72ca0adbf8d30044f9ff621f961981:

  • Change in Name from Cyalume Technologies, Inc., to Safariland, LLC, due to acquisition;
  • Change in Name and Address from GECAS Australia Pty Ltd at 572 Swan Street, Burnley, Victoria 3121, Australia to AerCap Australia Pty Ltd at c/o TMF Corporate Services (Aust) Pty Limited, Suite 1, Level 11, 66 Goulburn Street, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia due to acquisition;
  • Change in Address for Mitsubishi International Corporation from 655 3rd Avenue, New York, New York 10017 to 151 W. 42nd Street, New York, New York 10036-6641;
  • Change in Name and Ownership from APSYS SAS to Airbus Protect SAS due to merger with Airbus CyberSecurity SAS;

 

*******

 

Department of Defense

 

June 17, 2022: The Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) is renaming the Department of Defense Consolidated Adjudications Facility (DOD CAF) to better reflect personnel vetting into the future. DoD CAF is now DCSA Consolidated Adjudication Services (CAS). The renaming to DCSA CAS does not change any internal or external organizational reporting relationships, missions, resources, or support functions. DCSA, through the CAS, will continue to deliver informed and timely adjudicative decisions for the Federal Government to enable operational readiness in keeping with risk management principles.

 

https://www.dcsa.mil/About-Us/News/News-Display/Article/3067652/renaming-of-the-dod-caf/

 

*******

 

Department of Commerce – Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

 

BIS Updates The EAR Adopting Prior Notification Requirements To Congress For Small Arms

 

June 1, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 32983: In this final rule, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) amended the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to add a new section, § 743.6, “Prior Notifications To Congress” of exports of semiautomatic firearms, to adopt a congressional notification requirement for certain license applications having semiautomatic firearms that are (i) classified under Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) 0A501.a and (ii) valued at $4 million or more. The congressional notification requirement will not apply if the total value of the application is valued at $4 million or more, but contains 0A501.a semiautomatic firearms valued at less than $4 million. Further, the congressional notification requirement will not apply to license applications if the 0A501.a semiautomatic firearms are destined for countries in Country Group A:5 or A:6 (see supplement no.1 to part 740 of the EAR), with the exception of Mexico, South Africa, and Turkey. The congressional notification requirement will also not apply to exports to personnel and agencies of the U.S. Government under License Exception GOV (§ 740.11(b) of the EAR) or when for the official use by an agency of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). While the ITAR's congressional notification requirement is informative for developing new § 743.6 of the EAR, BIS is utilizing a different scope for this congressional notification requirement. Under the EAR, exporters can make a good faith estimate of the quantity and value of exports needed over the standard four-year validity period of a BIS license. This can include a license covering multiple purchase orders or anticipated purchase orders. Under the ITAR, DSP-5 licenses are generally tied to a single purchase order. To account for these differences, BIS is using $4 million as the value for the congressional notification requirement under § 743.6, which is an equivalent annual average of $1 million in potential exports per year during the validity period of the license. Essentially, the value threshold in § 743.6 will be four times the value of the ITAR's value threshold in ITAR §123.15(a)(3) reflecting the difference in licensing requirements. Additionally, because these semiautomatic firearms are less sensitive than the fully-automatic firearms that continue to be controlled under USML Category I of the ITAR, the congressional notification requirement will not apply to the group of allied countries referenced above.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/06/01/2022-11761/adoption-of-congressional-notification-requirement-for-certain-semiautomatic-firearms-exports-under

 

*******

 

U.S. Census Bureau

 

June 30, 2022: The U.S. Census Bureau has researched the reporting of two data elements in the AES, reporting the USPPI Address and State of Origin and discovered that over 12 percent of the EEI contained differences even though the definitions are merely identical.  As a result, the Census Bureau’s Trade Regulations Branch (TRB) contacted USPPIs whose USPPI Address State and State of Origin did not match to educate and train on the AES filing requirements.  The overall goal of this research is to determine if the removal of the State of Origin data element would have any risk to the Census Bureau’s statistical processing.

Below is a common example of how to properly report the USPPI Address and State of Origin data elements:

A U.S. company, Pack, Inc. (Pack), headquartered in Texas sold goods to a foreign buyer in the United Kingdom. The goods originated in several states and were consolidated by a freight forwarder in California to be prepared for export.  Pack could not determine the state where the highest value of goods originated.  Therefore, to be compliant with the FTR, the USPPI Address and State of Origin shall be California, where the goods were consolidated.  This is the case, even if Pack does not own/lease the consolidation facility.  Pack would be incorrect if they reported their headquarters in Texas as the USPPI Address and State of Origin because that is not the location where the goods actually began their journey to the port of export.

For reference, the definitions from section 30.6 of the FTR are provided below:

(a)(1)(ii) Address of the USPPI. In all EEI filings, the USPPI shall report the address or location (no post office box number) from which the goods actually begin the journey to the port of export even if the USPPI does not own/lease the facility.  For example, the EEI covering goods laden aboard a truck at a warehouse in Georgia for transport to Florida for loading onto a vessel for export to a foreign country shall show the address of the warehouse in Georgia. For shipments with multiple origins, report the address from which the commodity with the greatest value begins its export journey. If such information is not known, report the address in the state where the commodities are consolidated for export.

(a)(4) U.S. state of origin. The U.S. state of origin is the 2-character postal code for the state in which the goods begin their journey to the port of export. For example, a shipment covering goods laden aboard a truck at a warehouse in Georgia for transport to Florida for loading onto a vessel for export to a foreign country shall show Georgia as the state of origin. The U.S. state of origin may be different from the U.S. state where the goods were produced, mined, or grown. For shipments of multi-state origin, reported as a single shipment, report the U.S. state of the commodity with the greatest value. If such information is not known, report the state in which the commodities are consolidated for export.

 

LATEST SANCTIONS FINES & PENALTIES

 

This section of our newsletter provides information on the latest sanctions, fines, and penalties for export violations or matters of non-compliance with the ITAR or EAR issued by the US government enforcement agencies. It is provided as a service to exporters and associates of FD Associates to remind them of the importance of extreme due diligence in all international trade and export compliance matters, particularly those involving exports subject to the ITAR or the EAR. Don't let this happen to you or your company! Call us with questions or concerns at 703-847-5801 or email info@fdassociates.net.

 

Sanctions

 

The U.S. Department of State:

 

June 9, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 35281: Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled pursuant to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (“INA”), and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, the U.S. Department of State continues to designate al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (and Other Aliases) as a Foreign Terrorist Organization.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/06/09/2022-12356/review-of-the-designation-as-foreign-terrorist-organizations-of-al-qaida-in-the-arabian-peninsula

 

*******

 

Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)

 

June 6, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 34154: In response to the Russian Federation's (Russia's) further invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, the Department of Commerce amended the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by adding 71 entities under 71 entries to the Entity List. These entities have been determined by the U.S. Government to be acting contrary to the national security interests or foreign policy of the United States and will be listed on the Entity List under the destinations of Belarus and Russia.

 

For the reasons described above, this final rule adds the following 71 entities under 71 entries to the Entity List and includes, where appropriate, aliases:

 

Belarus:

  • Joint Stock Company Eleron.

 

Russia:

  • A. Kharkevich Institute for Information Transmission Problems (IITP), Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS);
  • Ak Bars Holding;
  • AO Rubin;
  • Branch of AO Company Sukhoi Yuri Gagarin Komsomolsk on Amur Aircraft Plant;
  • Branch of PAO Il—Aviastar;
  • Branch of RSK MiG Nizhny Novgorod Aircraft Construction Plant Sokol;
  • Chkalov Novosibirsk Aviation Plant;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Joint Stock Company Aeropribor Voskhod;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Joint Stock Company All Russian Scientific Research Institute Gradient;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Joint Stock Company Almatyevsk Radiopribor Plant;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Joint Stock Company Experimental Design Bureau Elektroavtomatika in the name of P.A. Efimov;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Joint Stock Company Industrial Controls Design Bureau;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Joint Stock Company Kazan Instrument Engineering and Design Bureau;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Joint Stock Company Microtechnology;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Joint Stock Company Phasotron Scientific Research Institute of Radio Engineering;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Joint Stock Company Radiopribor;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Joint Stock Company Ramensk Instrument Engineering Bureau;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Joint Stock Company Research and Production Center SAPSAN;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Joint Stock Company Rychag;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Joint Stock Company Scientific Production Enterprise Izmeritel;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Joint Stock Company Scientific Production Union for Radioelectronics named after V.I. Shimko;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Joint Stock Company Taganrog Communications Scientific Research Institute;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Joint Stock Company Urals Instrument Engineering Plant;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Joint Stock Company Vzlet Engineering Testing Support;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Joint Stock Company Zhiguli Radio Plant;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Public Joint Stock Company Bryansk Special Design Bureau;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Public Joint Stock Company Moscow Institute of Electro Mechanics and Automation;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Public Joint Stock Company Stavropol Radio Plant Signal;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Public Joint Stock Company Techpribor;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, Ramensky Instrument Engineering Plant;
  • Concern Radio-Electronic Technologies, V.V. Tarasov Avia Avtomatika;
  • Design Bureau of Chemical Machine Building KBKhM;
  • Far Eastern Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Center;
  • Gazprom Neft Shelf;
  • Ilyushin Aviation Complex Branch: Myasishcheva Experimental Mechanical Engineering Plant;
  • Institute of Marine Technology Problems Far East Branch Russian Academy of Sciences;
  • Irkutsk Aviation Plant;
  • Joint Stock Company Aerocomposit;
  • Joint Stock Company Avtomatika;
  • Joint Stock Company Bryansk Electromechanical Plant;
  • Joint Stock Company Eleron;
  • Joint Stock Company Experimental Design Bureau named after A.S. Yakovlev;
  • Joint Stock Company Federal Research and Production Center Altai;
  • Joint Stock Company Head Special Design Bureau Prozhektor;
  • Joint Stock Company Ilyushin Aviation Complex;
  • Joint Stock Company Lazurit Central Design Bureau;
  • Joint Stock Company Ramensky Instrument Engineering Plant;
  • Joint Stock Company Research and Development Enterprise Protek;
  • Joint Stock Company SPMDB Malachite;
  • Joint Stock Company Votkinsky Zavod;
  • Kalyazinsky Machine Building Factory Branch of RSK MiG;
  • Main Directorate of Deep-Sea Research;
  • NPP Start;
  • OAO Radiofizika;
  • A. Voronin Lukhovitsk Aviation Plant, branch of RSK MiG;
  • Public Joint Stock Company Voronezh Joint Stock Aircraft Company;
  • Radio Technical Institute named after A. L. Mints;
  • Russian Federal Nuclear Center—All Russian Research Institute of Experimental Physics;
  • Shvabe JSC;
  • Special Research Bureau for Automation of Marine Researches Far East Branch Russian Academy of Sciences;
  • Special Technological Center LLC;
  • Petersburg Marine Bureau of Machine Building Malakhit;
  • Petersburg Naval Design Bureau Almaz;
  • Petersburg Shipbuilding Institution Krylov 45;
  • Strategic Control Posts Corporation;
  • Systems of Biological Synthesis LLC;
  • TsKB MT Rubin;
  • Vladimir Design Bureau for Radio Communications OJSC;
  • A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences; and
  • Voentelecom JSC.

 

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/06/06/2022-12144/additions-of-entities-to-the-entity-list

 

*******

 

June 16, 2022: The U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued an order temporarily denying all export privileges for Belavia Belarusian Airlines (Belavia) due to ongoing violations of the comprehensive export controls imposed on Belarus by the Commerce Department. The flag carrier and state-owned national airline of Belarus, Belavia has been providing flight services for passengers and cargo on U.S.-origin aircraft in violation of U.S. export controls. This is the first enforcement action taken by BIS against an airline in Belarus under the stringent export controls imposed by the United States in response to Belarus’s steadfast support of Russia’s unprovoked and brutal invasion of Ukraine.

 

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/about-bis/newsroom/press-releases/3029-2022-06-16-bis-press-release-belavia-tdo/file

 

*******

 

June 24, 2022: The U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued orders denying the export privileges of three Russian airlines – Nordwind Airlines, Pobeda Airlines, and S7 Airlines – due to ongoing apparent violations of the comprehensive export controls imposed on Russia by the Commerce Department. These three Temporary Denial Orders (TDOs) terminate the right of these airlines to participate in transactions subject to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), including exports and reexports from the United States. These TDOs are issued for 180 days and may be renewed.

 

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/about-bis/newsroom/press-releases/3038-2022-06-24-bis-press-release-nordwind-pobeda-s7-temporary-denial-orders/file

 

*******

 

June 30, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 38920: In this rule, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) amends the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by adding 36 entities under 41 entries to the Entity List. These 36 entities have been determined by the U.S. Government to be acting contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States. These entities will be listed on the Entity List under the destinations of the People’s Republic of China (China), Lithuania, Pakistan, the Russian Federation (Russia), Singapore, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the United Kingdom, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam. Some entities are added under multiple entries, accounting for the difference in the total number of entities and entries in this rule. This rule also revises eleven existing entries under the destinations of Belarus, China, Russia, and Slovakia and corrects one existing entry on the Entity List under the destination of Pakistan. Lastly, this rule removes two entities and one address for a non-listed entity, consisting of one removal of an entity and one removal of an address under the destination of China, and one removal under the destination of Pakistan. The removals from the Entity List are made in connection with requests for removal that BIS received pursuant to the EAR and a review of the information provided in those requests.

 

Six entities under ten entries are added to the Entity List on the basis of § 744.11(b) and under the destinations of China, Lithuania, Russia, the United Kingdom, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam. These six entities and their identified subsidiaries are added to the Entity List with a license requirement for all items subject to the EAR. BIS will review license applications for items for these entities under a policy of denial apart from food and medicine designated as EAR99, which will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. No license exceptions are available for exports, reexports, or transfers (in-country) to these entities.

 

  • Connec Electronic Ltd. (added under China and the United Kingdom);
  • King Pai Technology Co., Ltd. (added under China, Russia, and Vietnam);
  • Sinno Electronics Co., Ltd. (added under China and Lithuania);
  • Winninc Electronic (added under China);
  • World Jetta (H.K.) Logistics Limited (added under China); and
  • Promcomplektlogistic Private Company (added under Uzbekistan) for providing support to Russia’s military and/or defense industrial base.

 

 

The following twelve entities are added to the Entity List on the basis of § 744.11(b) under the destination of China.  These entities are added for their activities contrary to the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States. Specifically, these entities use deceptive practices to supply or attempt to supply Iran with U.S-origin electronics that would ultimately provide support to Iran’s military. These entities are added to the Entity List with a license requirement for all items subject to the EAR. BIS will review license applications for items for these entities under a presumption of denial. No license exceptions are available for exports, reexports, or transfers (in-country) to these entities.

 

  • At One Electronics;
  • Blueschip Company Limited;
  • Chen Zhouqian;
  • Chipwinone Electronics;
  • Chuangxinda ElectronicsTech Co., Ltd.;
  • Ehang International Trade Limited;
  • Gaohui HK Electronics;
  • ICSOSO Electronics Company Limited;
  • Shenzhen Avanlane;
  • Suntric Company Limited;
  • Wayne Weipeng; and
  • Yiru Zhuang.

 

 

Eight entities under nine entries to the Entity List on the basis of § 744.11(b) under the destinations of China and Singapore, with one of the entities listed under both destinations.  All of the eight entities are added to the Entity List for acquiring and attempting to acquire U.S.-origin items in support of military applications, contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States. These entities are added to the Entity List with a license requirement for all items subject to the EAR. BIS will review license applications for items for these entities under a presumption of denial. No license exceptions are available for exports, reexports, or transfers (in-country) to these entities.

 

The entities are as follows:

  • Beijing Highlander Digital Technology Co. Ltd (added under China and Singapore);
  • China Academy of Science—Shenyang Institute of Automation;
  • China State Shipbuilding Corp.—Systems Engineering Research Institute;
  • CSSC Electronic Technology;
  • Highlander (Hong Kong) Maritime Navigation Science and Technology LLC;
  • Laurel Technologies Co. Ltd.;
  • Sansha Highlander Marine Information Technology Co. Ltd.; and
  • Sanya Highlander Huanyu Ocean Information Technology Corporation.

 

 

Two entities are added to the Entity List on the basis of § 744.11(b) under the destination of Russia.

The two entities are added on the basis of their attempts to procure items, including U.S.-origin items, for activities contrary to the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States. Specifically, Intertech Rus LLC and Laboratory Systems and Technologies LTD are acting as agents, fronts, or shell companies for OOO Intertech Instruments, an entity added to the Entity List under the destination of Russia on March 4, 2021 (86 FR 12531). The two entities are added to the Entity List with a license requirement for all items subject to the EAR. BIS will review license applications for items for these entities under the license review policies specified in §§ 744.2(d) (restrictions on certain nuclear end-uses), 744.3(d) (restrictions on certain rocket systems and unmanned aerial vehicles end uses), and 744.4(d) (restrictions on certain chemical and biological weapons end-uses) of the EAR. No license exceptions are available for exports, reexports, or transfers (incountry) to these entities.

 

  • Laboratory Systems and Technologies LTD; and
  • Intertech Rus LLC.

 

 

Two entities are added to the Entity List on the basis of § 744.11(b) under the destination of Russia.

These two entities are added for actions contrary to the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States. These entities are added to the Entity List with a license requirement for all items subject to the EAR. BIS will review license applications for items for these entities under a case-by-case license review policy. No license exceptions are available for exports, reexports, or transfers (in-country) to these entities.

 

  • FASTAIR; and

 

Four entities are added to the Entity List on the basis of §§ 744.11(b), 744.2 and 744.3.

The four entities are added for actions contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States, and because these entities pose an unacceptable risk of using or diverting items subject to the EAR to certain nuclear end-uses and certain rocket systems and unmanned aerial vehicles end-uses. These entities are added to the Entity List with a license requirement for all items subject to the EAR. BIS will review license applications for items for these entities under a presumption of denial. No license exceptions are available for exports, reexports, or transfers (in-country) to these entities.

 

  • Gulf Trade House FZC; UAE;
  • Industrial Process Automation; Pakistan;
  • Jim Corporation; Pakistan; and
  • Maira Trade International; Pakistan.

 

Al Noor Alaili Trading Company (ANATCO) is added to the Entity List on the basis of § 744.11(b) under the destination of the UAE. ANATCO is added for preventing the accomplishment of an End Use Check (EUC) by precluding access to, refusing to provide information to, and/or providing false or misleading information about parties to the transaction or the item to be checked. This entity is added to the Entity List with a license requirement for all items subject to the EAR. BIS will review license applications for items for this entity under a presumption of denial. No license exceptions are available for exports, reexports, or transfers (in-country) to this entity.

 

Scott Technologies FZE: UAE is added to the Entity List on the basis of § 744.11(b) for acquiring and attempting to acquire U.S.-origin items on behalf of entities listed on the Entity List, in circumvention of the licensing requirements set forth in § 744.11 of the EAR. Specifically, Scott Technologies FZE was added for re-exporting aircraft parts to Syria. A license is required for all items subject to the EAR. BIS will review license applications for items for this entity under a presumption of denial. No license exceptions are available for exports, reexports, or transfers (in-country) to this entity.

 

The following entities under to the Entity List including, where appropriate, aliases:

China:

  • At One Electronics;
  • Beijing Highlander Digital Technology Co. Ltd;
  • Blueschip Company Limited;
  • Chuangxinda Electronics-Tech Co.;
  • Chen Zhouqian;
  • China Academy of Science - Shenyang Institute of Automation;
  • China State Shipbuilding Corp. - Systems Engineering Research Institute;
  • Chipwinone Electronics Co., Limited;
  • Connec Electronic Ltd.;
  • CSSC Electronic Technology;
  • Ehang International Trade Limited;
  • Gaohui HK Electronics;
  • Highlander (Hong Kong) Maritime Navigation Science and Technology LLC;
  • ICSOSO Electronics Co. Ltd.;
  • King Pai Technology Co., Ltd.;
  • Laurel Technologies Co. Ltd.;
  • Sansha Highlander Marine Information Technology Co. Ltd.;
  • Sanya Highlander Huanyu Ocean Information Technology Corporation;
  • Shenzhen Avanlane;
  • Sinno Electronics Co., Ltd.;
  • Suntric Company Limited;
  • Wayne Weipeng;
  • Winninc Electronic;
  • World Jetta (H.K.) Logistics Limited; and
  • Yiru Zhuang Lithuania; Sinno Electronics.

 

Pakistan:

  • Industrial Process Automation;
  • Jim Corporation; and
  • Maira Trade International.

 

Russia:

  • Avcom-Technique;
  • FASTAIR;
  • Intertech Rus LLC;
  • KingPai Technology Int’l Co., Limited; and
  • Laboratory Systems and Technologies LTD.

 

Singapore:

  • Beijing Highlander Digital Technology Co., Ltd.

 

United Arab Emirates

  • Al Noor Alaili Trading Company;
  • Gulf Trade House FZC; and
  • Scott Technologies FZE.

 

United Kingdom:

  • Connec Electronic.

 

Uzbekistan:

  • Promcomplektlogistic Private Company.

 

Vietnam:

  • KingPai Technology Int’l Co., Limited.

 

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/regulations-docs/federal-register-notices/federal-register-2022/3053-87-fr-38920-entity-list-rule-effective-6-28-22-published-6-30-22/file and https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/federal-register-notices#fr38920

 

*******

 

Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)

 

June 1, 2022: the U.S. Department of Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control has published three new Frequently Asked Questions related to the Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Sanctions.


Question 1048: After the relevant 365-day divestment period, are U.S. financial institutions required to block the attempted purchase or sale of Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies' (CMIC) securities covered by Executive Order (E.O.) 13959, as amended?

 

Answer: No.  E.O. 13959, as amended, does not require U.S. financial institutions to block transactions.  However, transactions that would be prohibited under E.O. 13959, as amended (including an attempted sale of covered securities by a U.S. person made to effect the divestment of CMIC securities after the 365-day divestment period), must be rejected and reported to OFAC within 10 business days.  Consistent with FAQ 863, U.S. financial institutions may continue to intermediate purchases or sales by or from non-U.S. persons to or for non-U.S. persons.

 

 

Question 1047: For the purposes of Executive Order (E.O.) 13959, as amended, can holders of Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies' (CMIC) securities receive stock splits, cash dividends, or dividend reinvestments related to the covered securities, and are U.S. financial institutions allowed to process transactions related to this activity?

 

Answer: U.S. persons who hold securities of CMICs identified pursuant to E.O. 13959, as amended, may continue to receive cash dividends and stock splits related to such covered securities, and U.S. financial institutions may continue to process such transactions.  However, purchases of CMIC securities effected through dividend reinvestments constitute purchases that are prohibited pursuant to E.O. 13959, as amended.  U.S. persons may, however, continue to facilitate the distribution of dividend reinvestments for non-U.S. persons after the relevant divestment period.

 

Question 1046: Are U.S. persons required to divest their current holdings of Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies' (CMIC) securities before the end of the relevant 365-day divestment period pursuant to section 1(c) of Executive Order (E.O.) 13959, as amended?

 

Answer: U.S. persons are not required to divest their holdings of CMIC securities during the relevant 365-day divestment period and may continue to hold such securities after the divestment period.  E.O. 13959, as amended, permits purchases or sales made solely to effect the divestment of CMIC securities, but only during the 365-day divestment period.  Accordingly, any such purchase or sale is prohibited after the 365-day divestment period, absent OFAC authorization.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/added/2022-06-01 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220601

 

*******

 

June 2, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has issued Russia-related General License 25B, General License 36, General License 37 and General License 38.

 

General License 25B: All transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the receipt or transmission of telecommunications involving the Russian Federation that are prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR), are authorized. The exportation or reexportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, from the United States or by U.S. persons, wherever located, to the Russian Federation of services, software, hardware, or technology incident to the exchange of communications over the internet, such as instant messaging, videoconferencing, chat and email, social networking, sharing of photos, movies, and documents, web browsing, blogging, web hosting, and domain name registration services, that is prohibited by the RuHSR, is authorized.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl25b.pdf

 

General License 36: All transactions prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind down of transactions involving Public Joint Stock Company Severstal or any entity in which Public Joint Stock Company Severstal owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, August 31, 2022, provided that any payment to Public Joint Stock Company Severstal or any other blocked person must be made into a blocked account in accordance with the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR).

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl36.pdf

 

General License 37: All transactions prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind down of transactions involving Nord Gold PLC or any entity in which Nord Gold PLC owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, July 1, 2022, provided that any payment to Nord Gold PLC or any other blocked person must be made into a blocked account in accordance with the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR).

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl37.pdf

 

General License 38: All transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the processing of pension payments to U.S. persons that are prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 are authorized, provided that the only involvement of blocked persons is the processing of funds by financial institutions blocked pursuant to E.O. 14024.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl38.pdf

 

The OFAC is taking further action to degrade the key networks used by Russia’s elites, including President Vladimir Putin, to attempt to hide and move money and anonymously make use of luxury assets around the globe. OFAC targets a Kremlin-aligned yacht brokerage, several prominent Russian government officials, and a close Putin associate and money manager, Sergei Roldugin, who is a custodian of President Putin’s offshore wealth. In order to further tighten and enforce existing sanctions, this action further identifies yachts and aircraft in which sanctioned Russian elites maintain interests.

 

The OFAC also designated six individuals pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14059 because of their support for, or actions on behalf of, the Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion (CJNG), a violent Mexico-based organization that traffics a significant proportion of the fentanyl and other deadly drugs that enter the United States. OFAC’s action is the result of a collaboration between the U.S. Treasury Department, the Government of Mexico, and the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). U.S. Customs and Border Protection also provided support to this case.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Faizullin, Irek Envarovich of Russia;
  • Flores Mendoza, Severo of Mexico;
  • Gasilov, Andrei Valeryevich of Russia;
  • Godoy Arellano, Esther of Mexico;
  • Gonzalez Anguiano of Mexico;
  • Gorkov, Sergey Nikolaevich of Russia;
  • Grigorenko, Dmitriy Yuryevich of Russia;
  • Kochman, Evgeniy Borisovich of Russia, Monaco and France;
  • Mirtova, Elena Yuryevna of Russia;
  • Montero Pinzon, Julio Cesar of Mexico;
  • Mordashov, Alexey Aleksandrovich of Russia;
  • Mordashov, Kirill Alekseyevich of Russia;
  • Mordashov, Nikita Alekseyevich of Russia;
  • Mordashova, Marina Aleksandrovna of Russia;
  • Nisanov, God Semenovich of Russia and Azerbaijan;
  • Novitsky, Evgeny Grigorievich of Russia;
  • Reshetnikov, Maxim Gennadyevich of Russia;
  • Rincon Godoy, Angelberto of Mexico;
  • Rincon Godoy, Julio Efrain of Mexico;
  • Roldugin, Sergei Pavlovich of Russia;
  • Savelyev, Vitaly Gennadyevich of Russia;
  • Slyusar, Yury Borisovich of Russia; and
  • Zakharova, Mariya Vladimirovna of Russia.

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

  • Imperial Yachts SARL of Russia;
  • Ironstone Marine Investments of Cyprus;
  • JSC Argument of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company Algoritm of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Corporation Gelios of Russia;
  • Non-Profit Partnership Revival Of Maritime Traditions of Russia;
  • Nord Gold PLC of the United Kingdom, Russia, Burkina Faso, and Guinea;
  • O'Neill Assets Corporation of Cyprus;
  • OOO Bilding Menedzhment of Russia;
  • OOO Nord Marin Inzhiniring of Russia;
  • OOO Nord Marine of Russia;
  • OOO Yakht-Treid of Russia;
  • Public Joint Stock Company Severstal of Russia;
  • SCF Management Services Cyprus LTD of Cyprus;
  • Severgroup Limited Liability Company of Russia; and
  • SRL Skyline Aviation of San Marino.

The following vessels have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

  • Flying Fox (ZGHN) Yacht 9, 022GRT Cayman Islands flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 9829394;
  • Graceful (UBGV8) Yacht 2,685GRT Russia flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 1011551;
  • Madame Gu (ZGCW7) Yacht 2,991GRT Cayman Islands flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 1011331;
  • Nega (J8Y4483) Yacht Russia flag; Vessel Registration Identification RS 130280;
  • Olympia (ZCGR) Yacht 776GRT Cayman Islands flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 1006960;
  • Sea Rhapsody (V7VR9) Yacht 1,503GRT Marshall Islands flag; Vessel Registration Identification IMO 1010648; and
  • Shellest (UBAO8) Yacht Russia flag; Vessel Registration Identification RS 150443.

The following aircraft have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

  • 3A-MGU; Aircraft Model AS365 Dauphin; Aircraft Manufacturer's Serial Number (MSN) 6959; Aircraft Tail Number 3A-MGU;
  • P4-MGU; Aircraft Manufacture Date 18 Feb 2013; Aircraft Model A319; Aircraft Manufacturer's Serial Number (MSN) 5445; Aircraft Tail Number P4-MGU; and
  • T7-OKY; Aircraft Manufacture Date 2014; Aircraft Model BD700-1A10 Global 6000; Aircraft Manufacturer's Serial Number (MSN) 9576; Registration Number T7-OKY.

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220602 and https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0802 and https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0803

 

*******

 

June 6, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) updated its Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list.

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Cavara, Marinko of Bosnia and Herzegovina; and
  • Seranic, Alen of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220606

 

*******

 

June 6, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has published new Frequently Asked Questions and amended Frequently Asked Questions.

Question 1055: Do the new investment prohibitions of Executive Order (E.O.) 14066, E.O. 14068, or E.O. 14071 (collectively, “the respective E.O.s”) prohibit U.S. persons from lending funds to, or purchasing an equity interest in, entities located outside of the Russian Federation?  

Answer: No, provided that (i) such funds are not specifically intended for new projects or operations in the Russian Federation and (ii) the revenues of the entity located outside the Russian Federation are not predominantly derived from its investments in the Russian Federation.  For the purposes of assessing the foregoing, U.S. persons, including U.S. financial institutions, may reasonably rely upon the information available to them in the ordinary course of business.

Question 1054: Do the new investment prohibitions of Executive Order (E.O.) 14066, E.O. 14068, or E.O. 14071 (collectively, “the respective E.O.s”) prohibit U.S. persons from purchasing debt or equity securities issued by an entity in the Russian Federation?

Answer: Yes, the respective E.O.s prohibit U.S. persons from purchasing both new and existing debt and equity securities issued by an entity in the Russian Federation.  However, the new investment prohibitions of the respective E.O.s do not prohibit U.S. persons from selling or divesting, or facilitating the sale or divestment of, debt or equity securities issued by an entity in the Russian Federation to a non-U.S. person (see FAQs 1049 and 1053).  Please note that U.S. persons are not required to divest such securities and may continue to hold such previously acquired securities.  Moreover, the conversion of depositary receipts to underlying local shares of non-sanctioned Russian issuers would not be considered a prohibited “new investment” in the Russian Federation under the respective E.O.s.

Additionally, the purchase of shares in a U.S. fund that contains debt or equity securities issued by entities in the Russian Federation generally would not be considered a prohibited “new investment,” under the respective E.O.s, so long as these holdings represent less than a predominant share by value of debt or equity securities issued by entities in the Russian Federation.  As a result, U.S. persons may continue to invest in the fund, and the fund may continue to operate.  Generally, the fund may also divest itself of these prohibited holdings.

Please note that transactions must not involve blocked persons or other prohibited transactions unless exempt or otherwise authorized by OFAC.

Question 1053: Under the new investment prohibitions of Russia-related Executive Order (E.O.) 14066, E.O. 14068, or E.O. 14071 (collectively, “the respective E.O.s”), are transactions related to divestment permissible?

Answer: Yes.  Transactions related to the divestment or the facilitation of divestment of a pre-existing investment, including a pre-existing investment in an entity, project, or operation in the Russian Federation, are not prohibited by the new investment prohibitions of the respective E.O.s.  Such transactions may not involve a blocked person or otherwise prohibited transactions unless exempt or authorized by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).

The respective E.O.s prohibit any approval, financing, facilitation, or guarantee by a United States person, wherever located, of a transaction by a foreign person where the transaction by that foreign person would be prohibited if performed by a United States person or within the United States.  Such provisions do not prohibit U.S. persons from facilitating the wind-down or divestment of existing investment in the Russian Federation provided that such facilitation is on behalf of the selling party only.  For example, a U.S. financial institution is not prohibited from advising a client that seeks to sell an equity interest in an entity located in the Russian Federation (i.e., the seller in a divestment transaction).  However, a U.S. person is prohibited from providing any approval, financing, facilitation, or guarantee to a non-U.S. person that seeks to acquire an equity interest in an entity located in the Russian Federation (i.e., the buyer in such a transaction).

Such provisions also do not prohibit U.S. persons from advising on the requirements of U.S. sanctions laws consistent with OFAC’s Guidance on the Provision of Certain Services Relating to the Requirements of U.S. Sanctions Laws.

Question 1052: Can U.S. persons continue to fund their subsidiaries and affiliates with projects or operations located in the Russian Federation prior to the effective dates of the new investment prohibitions of Executive Order (E.O.) 14066, E.O. 14068, or E.O. 14071 (collectively, “the respective E.O.s”)?

 

Answer: Yes, provided that the use of the funds by the subsidiary or affiliate is consistent with the maintenance, as described in FAQ 1050.  “Maintenance” does not include the expansion of pre-existing projects or operations beyond those in effect prior to the effective dates of the respective E.O. prohibitions.  Therefore, U.S. persons may not fund new or expanded projects or operations undertaken by their subsidiaries and affiliates located in the Russian Federation after the effective dates of the respective E.O. prohibitions.

 

Question 1051: Is the export to the Russian Federation or import from the Russian Federation of goods, services, or technology considered “new investment” for the purposes of Russia-related Executive Order (E.O.) 14066, E.O. 14068, or E.O. 14071 (collectively, “the respective E.O.s”)?

Answer: The prohibitions on “new investment” pursuant to the respective E.O.s do not prohibit the export or import of goods, services, or technology, or related sales or purchases, to or from the Russian Federation, provided that such transaction is made pursuant to ordinary commercial sales terms (e.g., a payment of an invoice for goods made within the contracted time period, where such payment does not involve ongoing participation in royalties or ongoing profits) (see FAQ 1049).  Such transactions can be supported through traditional trade finance products, including commercial letters of credit and documentary collections.  U.S. persons are not prohibited pursuant to the respective E.O.s from entering into new contracts or agreements for such transactions.

However, please note that U.S. persons are prohibited or restricted from exporting, reexporting, or importing certain goods and services involving the Russian Federation, as described by law (see, for example, section 1(a)(i) of E.O. 14068; see also FAQ 415).

Question 1050: What types of transactions are considered to be “maintenance” activities described in FAQ 1049 and therefore outside the scope of the “new investment” prohibitions of Russia-related Executive Order (E.O.) 14066, E.O. 14068, or E.O. 14071 (collectively, “the respective E.O.s”)?

Answer: For the purposes of the respective E.O. prohibitions, “new investment” generally excludes the maintenance of investments in the Russian Federation that were made prior to the effective dates of the respective E.O. prohibitions (“pre-existing projects or operations”).  “Maintenance” of investments includes:

  • Transactions to ensure continuity of pre-existing projects or operations located in the Russian Federation, including payments to employees, suppliers, landlords, lenders, and partners;
  • The preservation and upkeep of the pre-existing tangible property in the Russian Federation; and
  • Activities associated with maintaining pre-existing capital investments or equity investments.

As a general matter, “maintenance” includes all transactions ordinarily incident to performing under an agreement in effect prior to the effective date of the respective E.O. prohibitions (“pre-existing agreement”), provided that such transactions are consistent with previously established practices and support pre-existing projects or operations.  However, “maintenance” does not include the expansion of pre-existing projects or operations beyond those in effect prior to the effective dates of the respective E.O. prohibitions, even if pursuant to a pre-existing agreement, where such expansion occurs on or after the effective dates of the respective E.O. prohibitions.  Nor does “maintenance” include commitments pursuant to the exercise of rights under a pre-existing agreement where such commitment is made on or after the effective dates of the respective E.O. prohibitions.

In connection with maintenance activity, U.S. persons also may modify or alter pre-existing agreements, or enter into new contracts or agreements, provided that any transaction under such contracts or agreements are consistent with previously established practices and support pre-existing projects or operations.  For example, a pre-existing agreement may be modified, or new contract established, to substitute suppliers, conduct maintenance or repairs, or comply with new environmental or safety standards.  In assessing whether activity is consistent with past practice, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including the transaction history between contract parties prior to the effective date of the respective E.O.s.

Note that maintenance activities must not involve blocked persons or other prohibited transactions unless exempt or otherwise authorized by OFAC.

Question 1049: For the purposes of Russia-related Executive Order (E.O.) 14066, E.O. 14068, or E.O. 14071 (collectively, “the respective E.O.s”), what is meant by the term “new investment”?

Answer: For the purposes of the respective E.O.s, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) views “investment” as the commitment of capital or other assets for the purpose of generating returns or appreciation.  OFAC interprets “new” investment as such a commitment made on or after the effective date of the respective E.O. prohibitions.  As a general matter, new investment includes such commitments that are pursuant to an agreement entered on or after the effective dates of the respective E.O. prohibitions.  New investment also includes such commitments pursuant to the exercise of rights under an agreement entered into before the effective dates of the respective E.O. prohibitions, where such commitment is made on or after the effective dates of the respective E.O. prohibitions.  We note, however, that new investment does not include the maintenance of an investment made prior to the applicable effective dates of the respective E.O. prohibitions (see FAQ 1050).

Unless exempt or otherwise authorized by OFAC, transactions that OFAC considers to be “new investment” for the purposes of the respective E.O. prohibitions include:

  • The purchase or acquisition of real estate in the Russian Federation, other than for noncommercial, personal use;
  • Entry into an agreement requiring the commitment of capital or other assets for the establishment or expansion of projects or operations in the Russian Federation, including the formation of joint ventures or other corporate entities in the Russian Federation;
  • Entry into an agreement providing for the participation in royalties or ongoing profits in the Russian Federation;
  • The lending of funds to persons located in the Russian Federation for commercial purposes, including when such funds are intended to be used to fund a new or expanded project or operation in the Russian Federation;
  • The purchase of an equity interest in an entity located in the Russian Federation (see FAQs 1054 and 1055); and
  • The purchase or acquisition of rights to natural resources or exploitation thereof in the Russian Federation.

Examples of transactions that OFAC does not consider to be “new investment” for the purposes of the respective E.O. prohibitions include:

  • Entry into, the performance of, or financing of a contract, pursuant to ordinary commercial sales terms, to sell or purchase goods, services, or technology to or from an entity in the Russian Federation (e.g., a payment of an invoice for goods, where payment is made within the contracted time period and such payment does not involve participation in royalties or ongoing profits);
  • Maintenance of an investment in the Russian Federation, where the investment was made prior to the effective date of the respective E.O. prohibitions, including maintenance of pre-existing entities, projects, or operations, including associated tangible property, in the Russian Federation (see FAQ 1050); and
  • Wind down or divestment of a pre-existing investment, such as a pre-existing investment in an entity, project, or operation, including any associated tangible property, located in the Russian Federation (see FAQs 1053 and 1054).

Even if a transaction is not a prohibited form of “new investment” pursuant to the respective E.O.s, U.S. persons engaging in the transaction must comply with all other relevant sanctions prohibitions, including those pursuant to Ukraine-/Russia-Related Sanctions Regulations and Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations (see, e.g., FAQ 415).  For example, the respective E.O.s include provisions prohibiting any approval, financing, facilitation, or guarantee by a United States person, wherever located, of a transaction by a foreign person where the transaction by that foreign person would be prohibited if performed by a United States person or within the United States.  For more information, see FAQ 1053.

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/added/2022-06-06

 

The following OFAC FAQs have been updated:

 

Questions 1019: For the purposes of Executive Order (E.O.) 14066, what is meant by the term “Russian Federation origin”?

Answer: For the purposes of E.O. 14066, the Office of Foreign Assets Control anticipates publishing regulations defining the term “Russian Federation origin” to include goods produced, manufactured, extracted, or processed in the Russian Federation, excluding any Russian Federation origin goods that has been incorporated or substantially transformed into a foreign-made product.

For information on prohibitions related to new investment pursuant to Russia-related E.O. 14066, E.O. 14068, and E.O. 14071, please see FAQs 1049-1055.

Question 1005: Does Directive 4 under Executive Order (E.O.) 14024, “Prohibitions Related to Transactions Involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation” (Russia-related Sovereign Transactions Directive) prohibit trading in the secondary markets for Russian sovereign debt?

Answer: No, the Russia-related Sovereign Transactions Directive does not prohibit trading in the secondary markets for debt or equity of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, or the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation (collectively, “Directive 4 entities”), provided that no Directive 4 entity is a counterparty to such a transaction. Please note, however, that Directive 1A under E.O. 14024, “Prohibitions Related to Certain Sovereign Debt of the Russian Federation” (Russia-related Sovereign Debt Directive), prohibits U.S. financial institutions from participation in the secondary market for ruble or non-ruble denominated bonds issued after March 1, 2022 by the Directive 4 entities. Moreover, the “new investment” prohibitions of E.O. 14066, E.O. 14068, and E.O. 14071 prohibit U.S. persons from purchasing debt and equity securities issued by an entity in the Russian Federation.  Please see FAQ 1054.

With respect to the receipt of interest, dividend, or maturity payments made in connection with debt or equity of the Directive 4 entities, please see General License 9A and FAQ 981.

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/updated/2022-06-06

 

*******

 

June 8, 2022: 87 Fed. Reg. 35088: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) amended the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 515 (CACR) to further implement portions of the President’s foreign policy toward Cuba. OFAC is also publishing a number of new and updated Frequently Asked Questions.

 

The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is amending the Cuban Assets Control Regulations to implement elements of the policy announced by the Administration on May 16, 2022 to increase support for the Cuban people. This rule authorizes group people-to-people educational travel to Cuba and removes certain restrictions on authorized academic educational activities, authorizes travel to attend or organize professional meetings or conferences in Cuba, removes the $1,000 quarterly limit on family remittances, and authorizes donative remittances to Cuba. These amendments also add or update several cross-references.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/fr87_35088.pdf

 

OFAC issued the following new Frequently Asked Question:

 

Question 1056: What does the June 9, 2022 amendment to the Cuban Assets Control Regulations (CACR) do?

Answer: Effective June 9, 2022, in consultation with the Department of State, OFAC amended the CACR to implement elements of policy changes announced by the Administration on May 16, 2022 to increase support for the Cuban people.

Professional meetings and conferences in Cuba:  Effective June 9, 2022, OFAC amended 31 CFR § 515.564(a) to include a general license authorizing, subject to conditions, travel-related and other transactions incident to attending or organizing professional meetings or conferences in Cuba, such as professional meetings or conferences to support expanded internet access and remittance processing and to provide additional support and training to independent Cuban entrepreneurs.  OFAC also amended and added cross-references to § 515.564(a) in notes to §§ 515.534, 515.542, 515.547, 515.572, 515.577, and 515.591.

Group people-to-people and other academic educational activities:  Effective June 9, 2022, OFAC amended § 515.565(a) to remove certain restrictions on authorized academic educational activities. OFAC also amended § 515.565(b) to authorize group people-to-people educational travel conducted under the auspices of an organization that is subject to U.S. jurisdiction and that sponsors such exchanges to promote people-to-people contact, provided such travelers are accompanied by an employee, paid consultant, or agent of the sponsoring organization.  Travel-related transactions authorized pursuant to § 515.565(b) must be for the purpose of engaging, while in Cuba, in a full-time schedule of activities that are intended to enhance contact with the Cuban people, support civil society in Cuba, or promote the Cuban people’s independence from Cuban authorities; and will result in meaningful interactions with individuals in Cuba.  This amendment does not authorize individual people-to-people travel.  Travel for tourist activities is not permitted.

Remittances:  Effective June 9, 2022, OFAC amended § 515.570(a) to remove the $1,000 quarterly limit on family remittances to Cuban nationals who are close relatives.  OFAC also added § 515.570(b) to authorize donative remittances to Cuban nationals who are not prohibited officials of the Government of Cuba, prohibited members of the Cuban Communist Party, or close relatives of a prohibited official of the Government of Cuba or prohibited member of the Cuban Communist Party.  Finally, OFAC added a general license in § 515.570(h) authorizing the unblocking and return of previously blocked remittances, provided they would be authorized under the revised § 515.570(a) or (b).

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/added/2022-06-08

 

See the following link for Frequently Asked Questions that OFAC amended related to Cuba:

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/updated/2022-06-08

 

*******

June 9, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has published new Russia Frequently Asked Questions.

 

Question 1068: For the purposes of the determination made pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 on May 8, 2022, “Prohibitions Related to Certain Accounting, Trust and Corporate Formation, and Management Consulting Services” (“the determination”), do accounting services include tax preparation and filing?

 

Answer: Yes.  U.S. persons, wherever located, are prohibited from exporting, reexporting, selling, or supplying, directly or indirectly, accounting services, which would include tax preparation and filing services, to any person located in the Russian Federation, unless otherwise exempt or authorized by OFAC.  Please see FAQ 1059 for more information.  Please note the determination excludes the provision by a U.S. person of any service to an entity located in the Russian Federation that is owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a United States person, and any service in connection with the wind down or divestiture of an entity located in the Russian Federation that is not owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a Russian person.

 

As noted in FAQ 1067, this determination does not prohibit the export, reexport, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, of tax preparation-related software to the Russian Federation, as distinct from tax preparation and filing services.  Please see FAQ 1067 for more information.
Question 1067: Do the prohibitions imposed by the determination made pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 on May 8, 2022, “Prohibitions Related to Certain Accounting, Trust and Corporate Formation, and Management Consulting Services” (“the determination”), prohibit U.S. persons from providing software related to accounting, management consulting, or trust and corporate formation to persons located in the Russian Federation? 

 

Answer: The determination does not prohibit U.S. persons from exporting, reexporting, selling, or supplying, directly or indirectly, software to the Russian Federation, nor does the determination prohibit U.S. persons from providing services associated with the export of such software, such as software design and engineering, provided that such associated services do not fall within the categories of management consulting, accounting, or trust and corporate formation.
For example, the following scenario describes activities that would not be prohibited under the determination:

  • A U.S. software company signs a contract with a company located in the Russian Federation (“Russian company”) for the design, engineering, licensing, and delivery of software that the Russian company uses to perform its internal accounting.  As part of the contract, the U.S. company provides continuing updates and technical support services related to the software (setting up new users, troubleshooting errors, etc.).

 

The following scenarios illustrate activities that would be prohibited under the determination:

  • A U.S. management consulting company signs a contract with a Russian company to assist the Russian company in selecting a new enterprise application software.  This contract includes assessing the needs of the Russian company, providing a list of possible software choices to the company, and providing continuing advisory services on the implementation and use of the software to optimize the Russian company’s profits.

 

Question 1066: Do the prohibitions imposed by the determination made pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 on May 8, 2022, “Prohibitions Related to Certain Accounting, Trust and Corporate Formation, and Management Consulting Services,” prohibit the provision of educational services, such as online university courses, on the subjects of accounting, management consulting, or trust and corporate formation to persons located in the Russian Federation?

 

Answer: No, provided such services do not evade or avoid the prohibition on providing the underlying services to persons located in the Russian Federation.

Released on 06/09/2022

 

Question 1065: Do the prohibitions imposed by the determination made pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 on May 8, 2022, “Prohibitions Related to Certain Accounting, Trust and Corporate Formation, and Management Consulting Services,” prohibit U.S. persons from serving as voting trustees on behalf of, or for shares of, persons located in the Russian Federation? 

 

Answer: Yes, unless otherwise exempt or authorized by OFAC.

 

Question 1064: Are executive search and vetting services included in the prohibition on management consulting services imposed by the determination made pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 on May 8, 2022, “Prohibitions Related to Certain Accounting, Trust and Corporate Formation, and Management Consulting Services”?

 

Answer: Yes.  For the purposes of this determination, OFAC interprets management consulting services to include services related to strategic business advice; organizational and systems planning, evaluation, and selection; development or evaluation of marketing programs or implementation; mergers, acquisitions, and organizational structure; staff augmentation and human resources policies and practices; and brand management.  Please see FAQ 1034 for more information.

 

Question 1063: Do the prohibitions imposed by the determination made pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 on May 8, 2022, “Prohibitions Related to Certain Accounting, Trust and Corporate Formation, and Management Consulting Services” (“the determination”), apply only with respect to the formation of new trusts and companies or do the prohibitions also apply with respect to existing trusts and companies?

 

Answer: The prohibitions imposed by the determination do not distinguish between new and existing trusts and companies.  Under the determination, U.S. persons are prohibited from providing trust and corporate formation services to persons located in the Russian Federation, regardless of whether the services are performed as part of the formation of a new trust or company, or as part of the administration or maintenance of an existing trust or company.  Please see FAQ 1034 for more information.

 

In addition, please note that the determination excludes from the scope of the aforementioned services: (1) any service to an entity located in the Russian Federation that is owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a United States person; and (2) any service in connection with the wind down or divestiture of an entity located in the Russian Federation that is not owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a Russian person.

Released on 06/09/2022

 

Question 1062: Do the prohibitions imposed by the determination made pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 on May 8, 2022, “Prohibitions Related to Certain Accounting, Trust and Corporate Formation, and Management Consulting Services,” apply to services provided to a parent company located in the Russian Federation by a U.S. subsidiary?

 

Answer: Yes.  The prohibitions apply to services provided to a company located in the Russian Federation (the “Russian company”) by any U.S. person, including the Russian company’s U.S. subsidiary.

 

Question 1061: Does the determination made pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 on May 8, 2022, “Prohibitions Related to Certain Accounting, Trust and Corporate Formation, and Management Consulting Services” (“the determination”), prohibit U.S. persons from working as employees of entities located in the Russian Federation?

 

Answer: Not necessarily.  Under the determination, U.S. persons are prohibited from exporting, reexporting, selling, or supplying, directly or indirectly, management consulting, trust and corporate formation services, and accounting services to persons located in the Russian Federation.  Thus, U.S. persons are prohibited from providing these services to companies located in the Russian Federation (“Russian companies”) in their capacity as employees.  However, the determination does not prohibit U.S. persons from providing other services not covered by this determination as part of their employment by Russian companies.

In addition, please note that the determination excludes from the scope of the aforementioned services:  (1) any service to an entity located in the Russian Federation that is owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a United States person; and (2) any service in connection with the wind-down or divestiture of an entity located in the Russian Federation that is not owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a Russian person.
Question 1060: Does the determination made pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 on May 8, 2022, “Prohibitions Related to Certain Accounting, Trust and Corporate Formation, and Management Consulting Services” (“the determination”), prohibit U.S. persons from serving as directors of companies located in the Russian Federation?

 

Answer: Under the determination, U.S. persons are prohibited from exporting, reexporting, selling, or supplying, directly or indirectly, trust and corporate formation services to persons located in the Russian Federation.  This prohibition on trust and corporate formation services does not, in and of itself, prohibit U.S. persons from serving on the board of directors of a company located in the Russian Federation.

 

However, this determination would prohibit U.S. persons from providing nominee officer or director services in which a U.S. person is contracted to serve as a nominee officer, director, shareholder, or signatory of a legal person on behalf of a person located in the Russian Federation.

 

Question 1059: Does the determination made pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 on May 8, 2022, “Prohibitions Related to Certain Accounting, Trust and Corporate Formation, and Management Consulting Services” (“the determination”), prohibit U.S. persons from providing services to persons located outside of the Russian Federation that are owned or controlled by persons located in the Russian Federation?

 

Answer: No, provided that the provision of services is not an indirect export to a person located in the Russian Federation.  For the purposes of this determination, OFAC interprets the “indirect” provision of the prohibited services to include when the benefit of the services is ultimately received by a “person located in the Russian Federation.”

 

In contrast, OFAC would not consider to be prohibited the provision of services to a non-Russian company that has a physical presence and operations outside of the Russian Federation, including such a company owned or controlled by persons located in the Russian Federation, provided that the services will not be further exported or reexported to persons located in the Russian Federation.

 

For example, the following scenarios describe services that would be prohibited under the determination:

  • A U.S. corporate service provider administers a trust established under the laws of a U.S. state, where the trust exists predominantly to hold, sell, or purchase assets on behalf of a settlor, trustor, or beneficiary who is an individual ordinarily resident in Russia.
  • A U.S. corporate service provider registers a limited liability company in a third country on behalf of an individual ordinarily resident in Russia for the purpose of holding real estate assets, and this company has no other physical presence or operations in the third country.

 

The following scenarios illustrate services to a non-Russian subsidiary of a Russian person that would not be prohibited under the determination:

  • A U.S. accounting firm provides tax advisory and preparation services to the U.S. subsidiary of a Russian company.  This U.S. subsidiary has an office and employees in the United States and conducts business in the United States, and the services will not be exported or reexported to the Russian parent company.
  • A U.S. management consulting firm provides strategic business advice to the subsidiary of a Russian company located in a third country.  This subsidiary has an office and employees in the third country and conducts business in this third country, and the services will not be reexported to the Russian parent company.

 

Question 1058: For the purposes of section 1(a)(ii) of Executive Order (E.O.) 14071, what is meant by the term “person located in the Russian Federation”?

 

Answer: For the purposes of section 1(a)(ii) of E.O. 14071, OFAC interprets “person located in the Russian Federation” to include persons in the Russian Federation, individuals ordinarily resident in the Russian Federation, and entities incorporated or organized under the laws of the Russian Federation or any jurisdiction within the Russian Federation.

Please note that section 1(a)(ii) of E.O. 14071 prohibits the direct or indirect exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply from the United States, or by a United States person, wherever located, of such services determined pursuant to E.O. 14071.  For the purposes of E.O. 14071, OFAC interprets the “indirect” provision of such services to include when the benefit of the services is ultimately received by a “person located in the Russian Federation.”  Please see FAQ 1059 for more information.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/added/2022-06-09

 

*******

 

June 10, 2022: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is issuing Syria General License 21A, Venezuela General License 39A, and Iran General License N-1, "Authorizing Certain Activities to Respond to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic." In addition, OFAC is also publishing a number of updated Frequently Asked Questions.

 

Syria General License 21A: Authorizing certain COVID-19-related transactions prohibited by the Syrian Sanctions Regulations. The following transactions and activities that are prohibited by the Syrian Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 542 (SySR), are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, June 17, 2023:

(1) Exportation of services related to COVID-19. All transactions and activities related to the exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, of services to Syria that are related to the prevention, diagnosis, or treatment of COVID-19 (including research or clinical studies relating to COVID-19); and (2) COVID-19-related transactions involving certain blocked persons. All transactions and activities involving the Government of Syria, Polymedics LLC, Letia Company, or any entity in which Polymedics LLC or Letia Company owns, whether individually or in the aggregate, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest, that are related to the prevention, diagnosis, or treatment of COVID-19 (including research or clinical studies relating to COVID-19), provided that any exportation or reexportation of items to Syria must be licensed or otherwise authorized by the Department of Commerce.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/syria_gl21a.pdf

 

Venezuela General License 39A: Authorizing certain COVID-19-related transactions involving the Government of Venezuela. All transactions and activities involving the Government of Venezuela that are related to the prevention, diagnosis, or treatment of COVID-19 (including research or clinical studies relating to COVID-19), that are prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 13808 of August 27, 2017, as amended by E.O. 13857 of January 25, 2019, or E.O. 13884 of August 5, 2019, each as incorporated into the Venezuela Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 591 (the VSR), are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, June 17, 2023.

 

Authorizing certain COVID-19-related transactions involving certain banks. All transactions and activities described above involving Banco Central de Venezuela (BCV), Banco de Venezuela, S.A. Banco Universal (Banco de Venezuela), Banco Bicentenario del Pueblo, de la Clase Obrera, Mujer y Comunas, Banco Universal C.A. (Banco Bicentenario del Pueblo), or any entity in which BCV, Banco de Venezuela, or Banco Bicentenario del Pueblo owns, whether individually or in the aggregate, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest, that are prohibited by E.O. 13850 of November 1, 2018, as amended by E.O. 13857, each as incorporated into the VSR, are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, June 17, 2023.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/venezuela_gl39a.pdf

 

Iran General License N-1: Authorizing certain COVID-19-related transactions prohibited by the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations. The following transactions and activities that are prohibited by the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 560 (ITSR), are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, June 17, 2023:

(1) Exportation of goods or technology. All transactions and activities related to the exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, of goods or technology for use in connection with the prevention, diagnosis, or treatment of COVID-19 (including research or clinical studies related to COVID-19) to Iran or the Government of Iran, or to persons in third countries purchasing specifically for resale to Iran or the Government of Iran;

(2) Importation of or dealings in certain COVID-19-related goods. All transactions and activities related to the importation into the United States of, or dealings in or related to, goods that previously were exported or reexported to Iran or the Government of Iran pursuant to this general license and that are broken, defective, or non-operational, or are connected to product recalls, adverse events, or other safety concerns, or for routine maintenance or the permanent return of such items to the United States or a third country; and

(3) Exportation or importation of services. All transactions and activities related to the exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, of services to Iran or the Government of Iran, or the importation into the United States of, or dealings in or related to, Iranian-origin services, in each case that are related to the prevention, diagnosis, or treatment of COVID-19 (including research or clinical studies relating to COVID-19). (b) Authorizing certain transactions involving the Central Bank of Iran (CBI) or the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC). All transactions and activities described above involving CBI, NIOC, or any entity in which NIOC owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest, that are prohibited by the ITSR, the Global Terrorism Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 594 (GTSR), or Executive Order (E.O.) 13224, as amended, are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, June 17, 2023.

 

Authorizing certain financial transactions. The processing of funds transfers or trade finance transactions that are ordinarily incident and necessary to give effect to the transactions and activities authorized in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this general license that are prohibited by the ITSR, GTSR, or E.O. 13224, as amended, are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, June 17, 2023.

Any exportation or reexportation of goods or technology pursuant to the above is subject to the following conditions:

(1) Any goods or technology exported or reexported must: (i) Be designated as EAR99 under the Export Administration Regulations, 15 CFR parts 730 through 774 (EAR); or (ii) In the case of goods or technology that are not subject to the EAR, not be listed on any multilateral export control regime; and

(2) All exports or reexports made pursuant to this general license must be concluded prior to the expiration date of this general license.

 

This general license does not authorize:

(1) The exportation or reexportation of goods or technology to CBI, NIOC, or any entity in which NIOC owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest;

(2) The exportation or reexportation of any goods, technology, or services to military, intelligence, or law enforcement purchasers or importers;

(3) The exportation or reexportation of any goods, technology, or services used to facilitate the development or production of a chemical or biological weapon or weapon of mass destruction;

(4) The unblocking of any property blocked pursuant to any part of 31 CFR chapter V; or

(5) Any transactions or activities otherwise prohibited by the ITSR, the GTSR, or E.O. 13224, as amended, or prohibited by any other part of 31 CFR chapter V, or involving any person blocked pursuant to the GTSR or E.O. 13224, as amended.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/iran_gln1.pdf

 

*******

 

June 14, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued Russia-related General License 8C, "Authorizing Transactions Related to Energy."  In addition, OFAC has published amended Frequently Asked Questions.

 

Russia-related General License 8C: All transactions prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 involving one or more of the following entities that are related to energy are authorized, through 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time, December 5, 2022:

(1) State Corporation Bank for Development and Foreign Economic Affairs Vnesheconombank;

(2) Public Joint Stock Company Bank Financial Corporation Otkritie;

(3) Sovcombank Open Joint Stock Company;

(4) Public Joint Stock Company Sberbank of Russia;

(5) VTB Bank Public Joint Stock Company;

(6) Joint Stock Company Alfa-Bank;

(7) Any entity in which one or more of the above persons own, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest; or

(8) the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.

 

For the purposes of this general license, the term “related to energy” means the extraction, production, refinement, liquefaction, gasification, regasification, conversion, enrichment, fabrication, transport, or purchase of petroleum, including crude oil, lease condensates, unfinished oils, natural gas liquids, petroleum products, natural gas, or other products capable of producing energy, such as coal, wood, or agricultural products used to manufacture biofuels, or uranium in any form, as well as the development, production, generation, transmission, or exchange of power, through any means, including nuclear, thermal, and renewable energy sources.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl8c.pdf

 

See the following link for OFAC’s amended Frequently Asked Questions:

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/updated/2022-06-14

 

*******

 

June 15, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is designating two key supporters of the ethnically motivated violent extremist group known as the Russian Imperial Movement (RIM) pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13224, as amended. RIM was previously designated by the U.S. Department of State as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) organization on April 7, 2020 for having provided training for acts of terrorism. Concurrent with OFAC’s action, the U.S. Department of State also designated an individual for posing a significant risk of committing acts of terrorism.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Shevchuk, Stanislav of the Ukraine;
  • Thulin, Anton of Sweden; and
  • Zhuchkovsky, Alexander of Russia.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220615 and https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0817

 

*******

 

June 16, 2022: The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned a network of Iranian petrochemical producers, as well as front companies in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) that support Triliance Petrochemical Co. Ltd. (Triliance) and Iran’s Petrochemical Commercial Company (PCC), entities instrumental in brokering the sale of Iranian petrochemicals abroad. This network helps effectuate international transactions and evade sanctions, supporting the sale of Iranian petrochemical products to customers in the PRC and the rest of East Asia.

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Bhore, Mohammed Shaheed Ruknooddin of India; and
  • Gao, Jingfeng of China.

 

The following entities have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Fanavaran Petrochemical Company of Iran;
  • Future Gate Fuel And Petrochemical Trading L.L.C. of the United Arab Emirates;
  • GX Shipping FZE of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Keen Well International Limited of China;
  • Kharg Petrochemical Company Limited of Iran;
  • Marun Petrochemical Company of Iran;
  • Sky Zone Trading FZE of the United Arab Emirates;
  • Teamford Enterprises Limited of China; and
  • Youchem General Trading FZE of the United Arab Emirates.

 

See the following links for the names of entities removed from OFAC’s SDN list.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0819 and https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220616

 

 

*******

 

June 17, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is issuing Nicaragua-related General License 3. OFAC is also publishing one related Frequently Asked Question.

 

Nicaragua-related General License 3: All transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind-down of transactions involving Eniminas, or any entity in which Eniminas owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest that are prohibited by the Nicaragua Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 582 (the NSR), are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, July 18, 2022, provided that any payment to a blocked person must be made into a blocked account in accordance with the NSR. This general license does not authorize any transactions otherwise prohibited by the NSR, including transactions involving any person blocked pursuant to the NSR other than the blocked persons described above in this general license, unless separately authorized.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/nicaragua_gl3.pdf

 

The following Frequently Asked Question regarding Nicaragua has been published:

 

Question 1069: What does Nicaragua General License (GL) 3 authorize?

 

Answer: Nicaragua GL 3authorizes U.S. persons to engage in transactions prohibited by the Nicaragua Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 582 (the NSR), that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind down of transactions involving Empresa Nicaraguense de Minas (Eniminas), or any entity in which Eniminas owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest (collectively, “Blocked Eniminas Entities”), through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, July 18, 2022, provided that any payment to a blocked person must be made into a blocked account in accordance with the NSR.

 

After the expiration of this authorization, unless exempt or authorized by the Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. persons will be prohibited from engaging in transactions with the Blocked Eniminas Entities and must block such entities’ property or interests in property that are in, or thereafter come within, the United States, or the possession or control of a U.S. person.

 

Non-U.S. persons generally do not risk exposure to the U.S. blocking sanctions under the NSR for engaging in transactions with blocked persons, where those transactions would not require a specific license if engaged in by a U.S. person.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/1069

 

In addition, the following names have been added to OFAC's list of Specially Designated Nationals:

 

The following individual has been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Lopez Delgado, Ruy, Carretera Masaya, of Nicaragua.

 

The following entity has been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • Empresa Nicaraguense De Minas of Nicaragua.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220617

 

*******

June 17, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) removed the following Venezuelan national and nephew of the first lady Cilia Flores and her husband Nicolás Maduro.

Malpica Flores, Carlos Erik, of Venezuela.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220617_33

 

*******

 

June 28, 2022: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is issuing Russia-Related General License 39, General License 40, General License 41, and General License 42. OFAC is also issuing Russia-Related General License 43. OFAC has published a Determination Pursuant to Section 1(a)(i) of Executive Order 14068 as well as one new Frequently Asked Question and one amended Frequently Asked Question.

 

Russia-Related General License 39: All transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind-down of any transaction involving State Corporation Rostec, or any entity blocked not earlier than June 28, 2022, in which State Corporation Rostec owns, directly or indirectly, a 50 percent or greater interest, that are prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, August 11, 2022, provided that any payment to a blocked person must be made into a blocked account in accordance with the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR).

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl39.pdf

 

General License 40: All transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the provision, exportation, or reexportation of goods, technology, or services to ensure the safety of civil aviation involving one or more of the blocked entities listed in the Annex to this general license and that are prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 are authorized, provided that:

(1) The aircraft is registered in a jurisdiction solely outside of the Russian Federation; and

(2) The goods, technology, or services that are provided, exported, or reexported are for use on aircraft operated solely for civil aviation purposes.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl40.pdf

 

General License 41: All transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the manufacture, sale, and maintenance, including the provision and receipt of warranty and maintenance services, of agricultural equipment, components, and spare parts produced by Nefaz Publicly Traded Company (“Nefaz”) or Public Joint Stock Company Tutaev Motor Plant (“Tutaev Motor Plant”), or any entity in which Nefaz or Tutaev Motor Plant owns, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest, that are prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR), are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time, December 22, 2022, provided that any payment to a blocked person must be made into a blocked account in accordance with the RuHSR.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl41.pdf

 

General License 42: All transactions involving the Federal Security Service (a.k.a. Federalnaya Sluzhba Bezopasnosti) (a.k.a. FSB) prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 are authorized, provided that such transactions and activities are ordinarily incidents and necessary to:

(1) Requesting, receiving, utilizing, paying for, or dealing in licenses, permits, certifications, or notifications issued or registered by the Federal Security Service for the importation, distribution, or use of information technology products in the Russian Federation, provided that

(i) the exportation, reexportation, or provision of any goods or technology that are subject to the Export Administration Regulations, 15 CFR parts 730 through 774, is licensed or otherwise authorized by the Department of Commerce; and

(ii) the payment of any fees to the Federal Security Service for such licenses, permits, certifications, or notifications does not exceed $5,000 in any calendar year;

Note to paragraph (a)(1). Except for the limited purposes described in paragraph (a)(1), this paragraph does not authorize the exportation, reexportation, or provision of goods or technology to or on behalf of the Federal Security Service.

(2) Complying with law enforcement or administrative actions or investigations involving the Federal Security Service; and

(3) Complying with rules and regulations administered by the Federal Security Service.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl42.pdf

 

Russia-Related General License 43: All transactions prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the divestment or transfer of debt or equity of Public Joint Stock Company Severstal (“Severstal”) or Nord Gold PLC (“Nord Gold”), or any entity in which Severstal or Nord Gold owns, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, a 50 percent or greater interest, purchased prior to June 2, 2022 (“covered debt or equity”) are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, August 31, 2022, provided that any divestment or transfer, or facilitation of divestment or transfer, of covered debt or equity, must be to a non-U.S. person. All transactions prohibited by E.O. 14024 that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind-down of derivative contracts entered into prior to June 2, 2022, that (i) include a blocked person described in paragraph (a) of this general license as a counterparty or (ii) are linked to covered debt or equity are authorized through 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time, August 31, 2022, provided that any payments to a blocked person are made into a blocked account in accordance with the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 587 (RuHSR).

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/russia_gl43.pdf

 

Determination Pursuant to Section 1(a)(i) of Executive Order 14068:

 

Pursuant to sections 1(a)(i), 1(b), and 5 of Executive Order (E.O.) 14068 of March 11, 2022 (“Prohibiting Certain Imports, Exports, and New Investment With Respect to Continued Russian Federation Aggression”) and 31 CFR § 587.802, the Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control, in consultation with the Department of State and the Department of Commerce, hereby determines that the prohibitions in section 1(a)(i) of E.O. 14068 shall apply to the gold of Russian Federation origin. As a result, the importation into the United States of gold of Russian Federation origin is prohibited, except to the extent provided by law, or unless licensed or otherwise authorized by the Office of Foreign Assets Control.

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220628

OFAC added the following Frequently Asked Question:

Question 1070: What does the gold-related determination pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.)14068 prohibit?

 

Answer: The determination of June 28, 2022, issued pursuant to Section 1(a)(i) of E.O. 14068, “Prohibitions Related to Imports of Gold of Russian Federation Origin,” prohibits the importation into the United States of gold of Russian Federation origin.  Please note that per the determination, the importation into the United States of gold of Russian Federation origin that was located outside of the Russian Federation prior to June 28, 2022, is not prohibited.  For information regarding the term “Russian Federation origin,” please see FAQ 1019.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/added/2022-06-28

 

OFAC also amended the following Frequently Asked Question:


Question 1029: How do the prohibitions of Executive Order (E.O.) 14024 and other Russia-related sanctions impact gold-related transactions or persons participating in the gold market?

 

Answer: Gold-related transactions involving the Russian Federation may be sanctionable under E.O. 14024 or other Russia-related sanctions authorities.  For example, E.O. 14024 authorizes sanctions against:

  • Persons determined to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged or attempted to engage in, deceptive or structured transactions or dealings to circumvent U.S. sanctions, including through the use of assets such as gold or other precious metals;
  • Persons determined to operate or to have operated in the financial services sector of the Russian Federation economy, which could include those engaging in gold-related transactions involving the Russian Federation; and
  • Persons that have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, persons blocked under E.O. 14024.  This could include transactions in gold or other precious metals that involve such blocked persons.

 

In addition, gold-related transactions involving Russia or the Russian Federation may be prohibited under E.O. 14024 or other Russia-related sanctions authorities.  For example:

  • The determination of June 28, 2022, issued pursuant to E.O. 14068, “Prohibitions Related to Imports of Gold of Russian Federation Origin,” prohibits the importation into the United States of certain gold of Russian Federation origin (see FAQ 1070).
  • U.S. persons, including gold dealers, distributors, wholesalers, buyers, individual traders, refineries, and financial institutions, are generally prohibited from engaging in or facilitating prohibited transactions, including gold-related transactions, in which blocked persons have an interest.
  • U.S. persons are prohibited from engaging in any transaction — including gold-related transactions — involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, or the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, pursuant to Directive 4 under E.O. 14024, “Prohibitions Related to Transactions Involving the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the National Wealth Fund of the Russian Federation, and the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation (Russia-related Sovereign Transactions Directive).  Please see FAQ 998.
  • U.S. financial institutions are also generally prohibited from processing transactions, including gold-related transactions, involving foreign financial institutions that are determined to be subject to the prohibitions of Directive 2 under Executive Order 14024, “Prohibitions Related to Correspondent or Payable-Through Accounts and Processing of Transactions Involving Certain Foreign Financial Institutions” (Russia-related CAPTA Directive).  Please see FAQ 967 and FAQ 969.
  • Non-U.S. persons are prohibited from causing or conspiring to cause U.S. persons to violate U.S. sanctions, as well as engaging in conduct that evades or avoids a violation of OFAC sanctions.

 

Sanctioned Russian persons are known to employ a wide variety of measures in their efforts to evade U.S. and international sanctions. As such, U.S. persons, wherever located, including persons that process or facilitate gold-related transactions, must be vigilant against attempts to circumvent OFAC regulations and must take risk-based steps to ensure they do not engage in prohibited transactions.

 

Violations of OFAC regulations may result in criminal or civil penalties. OFAC is closely monitoring any efforts to circumvent or violate Russia-related sanctions, including through the use of gold or other precious metals, and is committed to using its authorities to act against sanctions evaders and promote compliance.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/updated/2022-06-28

 

OFAC also designated 70 entities, many of which are critical to the Russian Federation’s defense industrial base, including State Corporation Rostec, the cornerstone of Russia’s defense, industrial, technology, and manufacturing sectors, as well as 29 Russian individuals. These actions, taken pursuant to Executive Orders (E.O.s) 14024 and 14065, strike at the heart of Russia’s ability to develop and deploy weapons and technology used for Vladimir Putin’s brutal war of aggression against Ukraine. Concurrent with these sanctions actions, OFAC prohibited the importation of Russian gold into the United States, and Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued a joint alert with the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security, advising vigilance against Russian and Belarusian export control evasion. Financial institutions and the private sector continue to play a key role in disrupting Russia’s efforts to acquire critical goods and technology to support its war-making efforts.

 

The Director of OFAC, in consultation with the Department of State and the Department of Commerce, determined that the prohibitions of section 1(a)(i) of E.O. 14068 shall apply to the gold of Russian Federation origin, with immediate effect.  As a result, the importation into the United States of gold of Russian Federation origin is prohibited, except to the extent provided by law, or unless licensed or otherwise authorized by OFAC. This determination excludes gold of Russian Federation origin that was located outside of the Russian Federation prior to the implementation of this prohibition.

 

In addition, the following names have been added or updated to or removed from OFAC's list of Specially Designated Nationals or updated on the Sectoral Sanctions Identifications (SSI) list:

 

The following individuals have been added to OFAC’s SDN List:

 

  • Afanasyev, Dmitriy Valeryevich of Russia;
  • Ananchenko, Aleksandr Evgenyevich of Ukraine;
  • Andrianov, Nikolay Valentinovich of Russia;
  • Anosov, Viktor Yuryevich of Russia and Ukraine;
  • Antonov, Vladimir Nikolaevich of Russia and Ukraine;
  • Artyakov, Dmitriy Vladimirovich of Russia;
  • Artyakov, Vladimir Vladimirovich of Russia;
  • Artyakova, Tatiana Vladimirovna of Russia;
  • Borisova, Natalya Vladimirovna of Russia;
  • Brovko, Vasily Yuryevich of Russia;
  • Chumakov, Aleksey Nikolaevich of Russia;
  • Daniltsev, Yuriy Viktorovich of Russia and Ukraine;
  • Danylchenko, Halyna Viktorivna of Ukraine;
  • Dzinikashvili, Dmitriy Vladimirovich of Russia;
  • Enaldiev, Tamerlan Borisovich of Russia;
  • Evtushenko, Oleg Nikolaevich of Russia;
  • Ezhikov, Vladimir Vladimirovich of Russia;
  • Govtvin, Yuriy Nikolaevich of the Ukraine;
  • Grigoryev, Andrey Ivanovich of Russia;
  • Kandelaki, Tina of Georgia and Russia;
  • Khavchenko, Dmitriy Vasilyevich of Russia and Ukraine
  • Khotsenko, Vitaliy Pavlovich of Russia and Ukraine;
  • Kiryanov, Victor Nikolayevich of Russia;
  • Kiryanova, Tatiana Borisovna of Russia;
  • Kogogin, Sergei Anatolyevich of Russia;
  • Kokorev, Alexander Aleksandrovich of Russia;
  • Kokoreva, Natalia Vasilyevna of Russia;
  • Koleda, Mariya Vasilyevna of Russia;
  • Kondrakhin, Leontiy Andreyevich of Russia;
  • Kondrakhina, Melaniya Andreyevna of Russia;
  • Koptev, Yury Nikolayevich of Russia;
  • Krinitsyn, Oleg Anatolyevich of Russia;
  • Kulygina, Olga Ivanovna of Russia;
  • Kuznetsova, Anastasiya Viktorovna of Russia;
  • Lashkaryova, Nadezhda Vitalyevna of Russia;
  • Lelikov, Dmitry Yuryevich of Russia;
  • Lenshin, Roman Yuryevich of Russia;
  • Litvin, Vladimir Zalmanovich of Russia;
  • Nazarov, Aleksander Yuryevich of Russia;
  • Osin, Pavel Mikhaylovich of Russia;
  • Pereverzeva, Tatiana Viktorovna of the Ukraine;
  • Pinchuk, Andrei Yuryevich of of Russia and Moldova;
  • Popov, Aleksandr Nikolaevich of Russia;
  • Pugachyov, Oleg Ivanovich of Russia;
  • Serdyukov, Anatoly Eduardovich of Russia;
  • Serdyukov, Sergey Anatolevich of Russia;
  • Serdyukova, Natalya Anatolevna of Russia;
  • Shevchenko, Yuriy Valeryevich of Russia;
  • Sierra, Elena Oduliovna of Russia;
  • Smirnova, Natalya Ivanova of Russia;
  • Sosonnyy, Aleksey Petrovich of Russia;
  • Todorova, Anna Yurievna of Russia and Ukraine;
  • Tsyb, Sergey Anatolyevich of Russia;
  • Vasileva, Evgeniya Nikolaevna of Russia;
  • Volobuev, Nikolai Anatolevich of Russia;
  • Vybornykh, Maksim Vladimirovich of Russia; and
  • Zaviyalov, Igor Nikolaevich of Russia.

The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List:

 

  • 64th GUARDS DETACHED MOTOR RIFLE BRIGADE of Russia;
  • 76th Guards Airborne Assault Chernigov Red Banner Order Of Suvorov Division of Russia;
  • 234th Guards Airborne Assault Regiment of Russia;
  • Advanced Research Foundation of Russia;
  • Aktsionernoe Obshchestvo Elektron Optronik of Russia;
  • Aktsionernoe Obshchestvo Nauchno Issledovatelskii Institut Promyshlennogo Televideniya Rastr of Russia;
  • Aktsionernoe Obshchestvo Nauchno Issledovatelskii Institut Sredstv Vychislitelnoi Tekhniki of Russia;
  • Aktsionernoe Obshchestvo Nauchno Proizvodstvennoe Predpriyatie Svyaz of Russia;
  • Aktsionernoe Obshchestvo Ryazanskii Zavod Metallokeramicheskikh Priborov of Russia;
  • Aktsionernoe Obshchestvo Spetsialnoe Konstruktorskoe Byuro Vychislitelnoi Tekhniki of Russia;
  • Aktsionernoe Obshchestvo Spetsialnoe Proektno Konstruktorskoe Byuro Sredstv Upravleniya of Russia;
  • Aktsionernoe Obshchestvo Torgovo-Finansovaya Kompaniya Kamaz of Russia;
  • Ao Npp Tsiklon Test of Russia;
  • Aviaavtomatika Named After V. Tarasov JSC of Russia;
  • Begishevo Airport Joint Stock Company of Russia;
  • Bm Bank JSC of Russia;
  • Chelnyvodokanal OOO of Russia;
  • Closed Joint-Stock Company Scientific Production Enterprise Topaz of Russia;
  • Emc Sud Limited of Russia;
  • Energotsentr Irkut of Russia;
  • Federal Service For Military-Technical Cooperation of Russia;
  • Interregional Social Organization Union of Donbas Volunteers of Russia;
  • Irkut Corporation Joint Stock Company of Russia;
  • Irkut-Avtotrans of Russia;
  • Irkut-Remstroi of Russia;
  • Irkut-Stanko Service of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company All-Russian Research Institute Signal of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Arzamassky Priborostroitelny Zavod Imeni Plandina of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Center Of Research And Technology Services Dinamika of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Central Research Institute Cyclone of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Concern Avtomatika of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Corporation Moscow Institute of Heat Technology Of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Flight Research Institute N.A. M.M. Gromov of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Ilyushin Finance Company of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Information Security Reform of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Krasnodarskiy Avtocentr Kamaz of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Machine-Building Engineering Office Fakel of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Meteor Plant of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company North Western Regional Center Of Almaz Antey Concern Obukhovsky Plant of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Obninsk Research And Production Enterprise Technologiya of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Permskiy Zavod Mashinostroitel of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Plasma of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Production Association Strela of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Production Association Ural Optical And Mechanical Plant of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Radiopribor of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Radiozavod of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Ramensky Instrument Engineering Plant of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Research And Development Enterprise Almaz of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Research And Production Enterprise Radar Mms of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Research Institute Polyus Of M.F. Stelmakh of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Rt-Tekhpriemka of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Russian Research Institute Electronstandart of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Ryazan State Instrument Making Enterprise of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Scientific And Research Institute Of Electronic Engineering Materials of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Scientific Production Enterprise Kontakt of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Scientific Research Institute Giricond of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Scientific Research Institute Of Electrical Carbon Products of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Scientific Research Institute Platan With Plant of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Shipbuilding Corporation Ak Bars of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Shvabe of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Special Design Bureau Turbina of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Special Relay System Design And Engineering Bureau of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company State Scientific Research Institute Kristall of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Tekhnodinamika of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Trading House Rosel of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company United Engine Corporation of Russia;
  • Joint Stock Company Vyatskoye Mashinostroitelnoye Predpriyatiye Avitek of Russia;
  • JSC All Russian Research Institute Of Radio Engineering of Russia;
  • JSC Scientific And Production Association Of Electro Mechanic of Russia;
  • Kaluga Research Institute Of Radio Engineering JSC of Russia;
  • Kamaz Publicly Traded Company of Russia;
  • Kizlyar Electromechanical Plant JSC of Russia;
  • Krylov State Scientific Center Federal State Unitary Enterprise of Russia;
  • Leasing Company Kamaz Incorporated of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company Alfa-Invest of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company Kapo-Avtotrans of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company Kapo-Zhilbiltservis of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company Nauchno-Proizvodstvennoye Obyedineniye Radiovolna of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company PFMK of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company Private Security Organization RSB-Group of Russia;
  • Limited Liability Company RSB-Group of Russia;
  • Mariyskiy Machine-Building Plant Open Joint Stock Company of Russia;
  • Mikam Holdings Limited of Russia;
  • Moscow Institute Of Electromechanics And Automatics JSC of Russia;
  • Nefaz Publicly Traded Company of Russia;
  • Non-State Pension Fund First Industrial Alliance of Russia;
  • Open Joint Stock Company Ilyushin Aviation Complex of Russia;
  • Open Joint Stock Company Khabarovsk Radio Engineering Plant of Russia;
  • Open Joint Stock Company Moscow Machinery Building Plant Avangard of Russia;
  • Open Joint Stock Company Russian Electronics of Russia;
  • Open Joint Stock Company Start Scientific And Production Enterprise of Russia;
  • Private Company Promcomplektlogistic of Russia;
  • Public Joint Stock Company Research & Production Corporation Istok of Russia;
  • Public Joint Stock Company Taganrog Aviation Scientific-Technical Complex of Russia;
  • Public Joint Stock Company Tutaev Motor Plant of Russia;
  • Public Joint Stock Company United Aircraft Corporation of Russia;
  • Public Joint Stock Company Vympel Interstate Corporation of Russia;
  • Ramenskoye Design Company Joint Stock Company of Russia;
  • Rapart Servisez of Russia;
  • Rt-Business Development of Russia;
  • Rt-Capital Limited Liability Company of Russia;
  • Rt-Inform Limited Liability Company of Russia;
  • Rt-Project Technology Open Joint Stock Company of Russia;
  • Scientific And Research Institute Ferrit Domen of Russia;
  • Sportivno-Ozdorovitelnyi Tsentr Irkut-Zenit of Russia;
  • State Corporation Rostec of Russia;
  • State Flight Testing Center of Russia;
  • State Research Institute Of Aviation Systems State Research Center Of The Russian Federation of Russia;
  • The Limited Liability Company Networking Company Irkut of Russia;
  • Tipografiya Irkut of Russia;
  • Tupolev Public Joint Stock Company of Russia;
  • Zalog OOO of Russia.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220628 and https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0838

 

*******

 

June 30, 2022: The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control is amending the Global Terrorism Sanctions Regulations.

 

https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/recent-actions/20220630

 

See the following link for the scope of the amendment:

 

https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/126/20220630_gtsr.pdf

 

*******

 

Fines and Penalties

 

June 2, 2022: Janet Sturmer, age 66, of Manassas, Virginia was sentenced to 54 months in federal prison, followed by 3 years of supervised release, for conspiracy to commit mail, wire fraud, and aggravated identity theft.  As part of her guilty plea, Sturmer will be required to pay $4.4 million in restitution.

The sentence was announced by United States Attorney for the District of Maryland Erek L. Barron; Special Agent in Charge Christopher Dillard of the Department of Defense, Office of Inspector General, Defense Criminal Investigative Service - Mid-Atlantic Field Office; and Acting Special Agent in Charge Selwyn Smith of Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Baltimore. According to her plea agreement, from October 2015 to March 2017, Sturmer conspired with Peter Unakalu, Khalid Razaq, Brandon Ross, Saulina Eady, Saul Eady, and others to commit wire fraud by posing as navy contracted agents and convincing victim companies that conspiracy members were authorized to order specialized communications equipment without prior payment.

 

https://www.justice.gov/usao-md/pr/virginia-woman-sentenced-54-months-federal-prison-identity-theft-scheme-and-ordered-pay

 

*******

 

June 6, 2022: The United States of America has been authorized to seize a Boeing 787-8 aircraft and a Gulfstream G650ER aircraft owned and controlled by Russian oligarch Roman Abramovich, pursuant to a seizure warrant from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, which found that the airplanes are subject to seizure and forfeiture based on probable cause of violations of the Export Control Reform Act (ECRA) and the recent sanctions issued against Russia.

 

According to the seizure warrant and affidavit unsealed: In response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued various sanctions against Russia that impose export controls and license requirements to protect U.S. national security and foreign policy interests. These Russia sanctions include expanded prohibitions on the export, reexport, or in-country transfer of U.S.-manufactured aircraft and aircraft parts and components to or within Russia without a BIS license, and eliminate the availability of any license exception for aircraft owned or controlled, or under charter or lease, by Russia or a Russian national.

The Boeing and the Gulfstream each were reexported to Russia (i.e., flown from a foreign country to Russia) in violation of the ECRA and regulations issued thereunder, including the recent Russia sanctions. The Boeing was flown to Russia on March 4, 2022, without a BIS license, and is now in the United Arab Emirates. The Gulfstream was flown to Russia on March 12 and 15, 2022 without a BIS license, and remains in Russia. The Boeing and Gulfstream are owned and controlled by Roman Abramovich, a Russian national, through a series of shell companies in Cyprus, Jersey, and the British Virgin Islands.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/united-states-obtains-warrant-seizure-two-airplanes-russian-oligarch-roman-abramovich-worth

 

*******

 

June 6, 2022: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) Office of Export Enforcement (OEE) issued an Administrative Charging Letter against Russian oligarch Roman Abramovich, alleging violations of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) involving flights of two U.S. origin aircraft to Russia without the required export licenses from BIS. These aircraft include a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner (Tail Number P4- BDL, Manufacturer Serial Number 37306), valued at approximately $350 million, and a Gulfstream G650ER (Tail Number LX-RAY, Manufacturer Serial Number 6417), valued at approximately $60 million.

 

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/about-bis/newsroom/press-releases/3014-2022-06-06-bis-press-release-abramovich-charging-letter/file

 

*******

 

June 6, 2022: Rashad Sargeant, 27, of College Park, Georgia, has been sentenced for his role in trafficking firearms to Barbados. Together with his co-defendant, David Johnson, Sargeant shipped at least 30 firearms to Barbados after obliterating the serial numbers from the firearms and packing them inside false compartments in boxes. Rashad Sargeant has been sentenced to three years, ten months in prison to be followed by three years of supervised release after pleading guilty on September 2, 2021.

 

https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndga/pr/third-defendant-sentenced-trafficking-guns-barbados

 

*******

 

June 7, 2022: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) Office of Export Enforcement (OEE) issued an Administrative Charging Letter against Kenneth Scott and Scott Communications, Inc. (collectively “Scott”), as well as Mission Communications, LLC (“Mission”) of St. Ignatius, Montana have violated the Export Administration Regulations (“the Regulations” or “the EAR”) regarding the sale of certain radios with the knowledge that they were destined for Iran without the required U.S. Government authorization.

 

https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/export-violations-2022/1373-scott-charging-charging-letter-6-7-2022/file

 

*******

 

June 8, 2022: The Office of Export Enforcement at the U.S. Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), issued a Temporary Denial Order (TDO) suspending the export privileges of three U.S.-based companies, Quicksilver Manufacturing Inc., Rapid Cut LLC, and U.S. Prototype Inc., for 180 days for the unauthorized export to China of technical drawings and blueprints used to 3-D print satellite, rocket, and defense-related prototypes. This type of information is subject to strict U.S. export controls due to its sensitivity and importance to U.S. national security. “Outsourcing 3-D printing of space and defense prototypes to China harms U.S. national security,” said Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement Matthew S. Axelrod. “By sending their customers’ technical drawings and blueprints to China, these companies may have saved a few bucks—but they did so at the collective expense of protecting U.S. military technology.” TDOs are some of the most significant civil sanctions BIS can issue, cutting off not only the right to export items subject to the EAR from the U.S. but also to receive or participate in exports from the United States or reexports of items subject to the EAR. OEE’s order denies Quicksilver Manufacturing Inc., Rapid Cut LLC, and U.S. Prototype Inc., all of the export privileges described in part 764 of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), which include (but are not limited to) applying for, obtaining, or using any license, license exception, or export control document, or engaging in or benefitting from such transactions, in order to prevent imminent violations of the EAR. The order was issued for a renewable 180-day period and cuts off not only the companies’ ability to export from the United States but also their ability to receive or participate in exports from the United States. As described in the TDO, Quicksilver Manufacturing Inc., Rapid Cut LLC, and U.S. Prototype Inc., collectively utilizing the same rental mailbox, received export-controlled drawings from their domestic customers to 3-D-print requested items. Without their customers’ advance consent or knowledge, these drawings were provided to manufacturers in China to 3-D-print the items without the required U.S. Government authorizations. The items were then imported into the United States to be provided to the ordering customers.

 

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/about-bis/newsroom/press-releases/3023-2022-06-08-bis-press-release-quicksilver-rapid-cut-and-us-prototype-tdo/file and https://efoia.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/export-violations/export-violations-2022/1372-quicksilver-tdo-final-6-7-2022/file

 

*******

 

June 9, 2022: Joe Sery, former owner and chief executive officer of Tungsten Heavy Powder & Parts, pleaded guilty to conspiring to commit offenses against the United States, including the unlawful exportation of defense articles on the U.S. Munitions List from the United States to the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of India, and elsewhere, without first obtaining a valid license or approval for such export from the U.S. Department of State, in violation of federal export laws pursuant to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR).

 

According to his plea agreement, Sery admitted that, while the CEO of Tungsten Heavy Parts and Powder, he was educated and trained on the requirements of U.S. export control laws, which prohibit the unlicensed export of items and data contained on the U.S. Munitions List. Sery entered into contracts with various defense contractors related to munitions and obtained ITAR-controlled technical data from them.  Thereafter, knowing it was unlawful, he provided this information to a foreign national, his brother, who took the technical data to the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of India, and elsewhere at Sery’s direction.  Sery also permitted his brother full access to THPP’s file system while overseas, knowing that it contained export-controlled technical data.

 

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdca/pr/former-tungsten-heavy-powder-parts-ceo-pleads-guilty-conspiring-export-united-states

 

*******

 

June 16, 2022: Simon Saw-Teong Ang, 64, of Fayetteville, Arkansas, and former University of Arkansas professor was sentenced to 12 months and a day in prison followed by one year of supervised release on one count of making a false statement to the FBI about the existence of patents for his inventions in the People’s Republic of China (PRC).

 

According to court documents, there are 24 patents in the PRC, which bear Ang’s name or Chinese birth name. The University of Arkansas, where Ang worked as a professor, required individuals such as Ang to promptly furnish to the university “full and complete” disclosures of inventions, and university policy provided that it, not individual inventors, would own all inventions created by those subject to the policy. This policy was established “in furtherance of the commitment of the university to the widest possible distribution of the benefits of university research, the protection of inventions resulting from such research, and the development of Inventions for the public good.”

 

Despite this requirement, Ang did not disclose his Chinese patents to the university and, when interviewed by an FBI agent, lied about his involvement in the inventions. Specifically, when asked whether his name would be listed as “the inventor” of numerous patents in China, Ang denied being the inventor, despite knowing he was. In addition, Ang also received numerous talent awards from the PRC government, which he did not list on the university’s annual conflict of interest disclosure forms.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-university-arkansas-professor-sentenced-year-and-day-lying-federal-agents-about

 

*******

 

June 23, 2022: A federal grand jury in the Northern District of Georgia returned an indictment charging military contractors with an alleged fraud scheme involving government contracts totaling over $7 million.

The three-count indictment charges Envistacom LLC, its President Alan Carson and a vice president Valerie Hayes, and the owner of another company, Philip Flores, each with one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States and two counts of major fraud.

 

According to the indictment, from at least September 2014 through at least November 2016, the defendants and others conspired by preparing and procuring purported “competitive quotes” from other companies, which were sham quotes that were intentionally higher than the proposal prices and/or price quotes from Envistacom and Flores’ company to ensure the sole-source awards. The conspirators also concealed that the defendants prepared the independent government cost estimates and other procurement documents for the award of these contracts and made false statements, representations, and material omissions to federal government contracting officials regarding these estimates being legitimate independent cost estimates and the sham quotes being “competitive.”

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/military-contractors-indicted-7-million-procurement-fraud-scheme

 

*******

 

June 23, 2022: Shapour Moinian, 67, of San Diego, a former U.S. Army helicopter pilot-turned-civilian-contractor pleaded guilty in federal court, admitting that he acted as an unregistered agent of China and accepted thousands of dollars from representatives of the Chinese government to provide aviation-related information from his defense-contractor employers. He also pleaded guilty to making related false statements during national security background checks.

 

Moinian served in the Army in the United States, Germany, and South Korea from approximately 1977 through 2000. After his service, Moinian worked for various cleared defense contractors in the United States – including in San Diego – as well as the Department of Defense. “Cleared” is a term that indicates a contractor is permitted to work on projects that involve classified information. According to his plea agreement, while Moinian was working for a cleared defense contractor, or CDC, on various aviation projects used by the U.S. military and U.S. intelligence agencies, he was contacted by an individual in China who claimed to be working for a technical recruiting company. This person offered Moinian the opportunity to consult for the aviation industry in China.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-us-military-pilot-admits-acting-paid-agent-china-and-lying-national-security

 

*******

 

June 27, 2022: The Department of Justice announced that it signed settlement agreements requiring 16 private employers to pay a total of $832,944 in civil penalties to resolve claims that each company discriminated against non-U.S. citizens in hiring. According to the department, each company posted at least one job announcement excluding non-U.S. citizens on an online job recruitment platform operated by the Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech). One employer posted as many as 74 discriminatory advertisements on Georgia Tech’s platform, while several of the employers posted discriminatory advertisements on other college or university platforms as well. The department determined that the advertisements deterred qualified students from applying for jobs because of their citizenship status, and in many cases, the citizenship status restrictions also blocked students from applying or even meeting with company recruiters.

 

The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) generally prohibits employers and recruiters from limiting jobs based on citizenship or immigration status unless required by a law, regulation, executive order or government contract. The INA protects U.S. citizens, U.S. nationals, refugees, asylees, and recent lawful permanent residents from citizenship status discrimination in hiring, firing and recruitment or referral for a fee. Regardless of whether colleges or universities run afoul of the INA in the way they operate their job recruitment platforms, employers themselves are liable if the advertisements they post on those platforms violate the INA.

 

The 16 Private Employers that settled with the Department of Justice are: KPMG LLP, Keyot LLC, Area-I, Inc., CapTech, Akuna Capital, American Express Company, Sealed Air Corporation, Clarkston-Potomac Group, Toast, Inc., Blackbaud, Clay Electric Cooperative, Inc., CONMED, Edward Jones Investments, KNAPP Inc., SimpleNexus, LLC, f/k/a L Brewer and Associates, LLC, d/b/a LBA Ware, and The Royster Group, Inc.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-secures-settlements-16-employers-posting-job-advertisements-college

 

*******

 

June 28, 2022: A dual citizen of the United States and Iran, Kambiz Attar Kashani, 44, pleaded guilty to conspiring to illegally export U.S. goods, technology and services to end users in Iran, including the Government of Iran, in violation of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

According to court documents, Kashani and his co-conspirators, using two United Arab Emirates companies, evaded U.S. export laws between February 2019 and June 2021 by procuring electronic goods, technology, and services from U.S. technology companies for end-users in Iran without obtaining the required licenses or other authorization from the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). Kashani acted at the direction of an arm of the Central Bank of Iran (CBI). CBI has been designated by OFAC for having materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support to known terrorist organizations.

 

Kashani faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison, and he has agreed to pay a $50,000 fine, in addition to any forfeiture owed. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/us-citizen-pleads-guilty-conspiring-provide-electronic-equipment-and-technology-government

 

*******

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

JUNE 2022 EXPORT CONTROL REGULATION UPDATES Read More »